TC Energy Corporation
TC Energy Corporation TCANF Peers
See (TCANF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Midstream Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCANF | $5.39 | -36.59% | 53.5B | 2.12 | $2.54 | +8.84% |
| EBBNF | $22.96 | -0.46% | 103B | 10.35 | $2.22 | +6.38% |
| ENNPF | $16.69 | +6.36% | 102.6B | N/A | N/A | +9.40% |
| EBRGF | $12.50 | -0.79% | 102.6B | N/A | N/A | +12.28% |
| ENBGF | $17.00 | +2.44% | 101.3B | N/A | N/A | +9.54% |
| TNCAF | $12.29 | +8.28% | 53.4B | 4.84 | $2.54 | +10.20% |
| EBGEF | $24.12 | +0.02% | 52.6B | 10.87 | $2.22 | +9.47% |
| EBBGF | $23.50 | -0.21% | 51.2B | 10.59 | $2.22 | +7.13% |
| MPLXP | $33.38 | N/A | 34.1B | 11.29 | $2.96 | +7.24% |
| ENBRF | $14.01 | -0.55% | 30.6B | N/A | N/A | +12.49% |
Stock Comparison
TCANF vs EBBNF Comparison
TCANF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCANF stands at 53.5B. In comparison, EBBNF has a market cap of 103B. Regarding current trading prices, TCANF is priced at $5.39, while EBBNF trades at $22.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.12, whereas EBBNF's P/E ratio is 10.35. In terms of profitability, TCANF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EBBNF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TCANF is less volatile compared to EBBNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCANF.
TCANF vs ENNPF Comparison
TCANF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCANF stands at 53.5B. In comparison, ENNPF has a market cap of 102.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TCANF is priced at $5.39, while ENNPF trades at $16.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.12, whereas ENNPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCANF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ENNPF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TCANF is less volatile compared to ENNPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCANF.
TCANF vs EBRGF Comparison
TCANF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCANF stands at 53.5B. In comparison, EBRGF has a market cap of 102.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TCANF is priced at $5.39, while EBRGF trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.12, whereas EBRGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCANF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EBRGF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TCANF is less volatile compared to EBRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCANF.
TCANF vs ENBGF Comparison
TCANF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCANF stands at 53.5B. In comparison, ENBGF has a market cap of 101.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCANF is priced at $5.39, while ENBGF trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.12, whereas ENBGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCANF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ENBGF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TCANF and ENBGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TCANF vs TNCAF Comparison
TCANF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCANF stands at 53.5B. In comparison, TNCAF has a market cap of 53.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCANF is priced at $5.39, while TNCAF trades at $12.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.12, whereas TNCAF's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, TCANF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TNCAF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TCANF is less volatile compared to TNCAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCANF.
TCANF vs EBGEF Comparison
TCANF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCANF stands at 53.5B. In comparison, EBGEF has a market cap of 52.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TCANF is priced at $5.39, while EBGEF trades at $24.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.12, whereas EBGEF's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, TCANF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EBGEF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TCANF is less volatile compared to EBGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCANF.
TCANF vs EBBGF Comparison
TCANF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCANF stands at 53.5B. In comparison, EBBGF has a market cap of 51.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCANF is priced at $5.39, while EBBGF trades at $23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.12, whereas EBBGF's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, TCANF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EBBGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TCANF and EBBGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TCANF vs MPLXP Comparison
TCANF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCANF stands at 53.5B. In comparison, MPLXP has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCANF is priced at $5.39, while MPLXP trades at $33.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.12, whereas MPLXP's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, TCANF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MPLXP's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TCANF and MPLXP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TCANF vs ENBRF Comparison
TCANF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCANF stands at 53.5B. In comparison, ENBRF has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TCANF is priced at $5.39, while ENBRF trades at $14.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.12, whereas ENBRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCANF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ENBRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TCANF is less volatile compared to ENBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCANF.
TCANF vs EBRZF Comparison
TCANF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCANF stands at 53.5B. In comparison, EBRZF has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TCANF is priced at $5.39, while EBRZF trades at $12.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.12, whereas EBRZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCANF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EBRZF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TCANF is less volatile compared to EBRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCANF.
TCANF vs PMMBF Comparison
TCANF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCANF stands at 53.5B. In comparison, PMMBF has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, TCANF is priced at $5.39, while PMMBF trades at $16.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.12, whereas PMMBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCANF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PMMBF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TCANF is less volatile compared to PMMBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCANF.
TCANF vs SOCGM Comparison
TCANF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCANF stands at 53.5B. In comparison, SOCGM has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCANF is priced at $5.39, while SOCGM trades at $24.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.12, whereas SOCGM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCANF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SOCGM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TCANF is less volatile compared to SOCGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCANF.
TCANF vs PPLAF Comparison
TCANF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCANF stands at 53.5B. In comparison, PPLAF has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TCANF is priced at $5.39, while PPLAF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.12, whereas PPLAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCANF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PPLAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TCANF and PPLAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TCANF vs PBNAF Comparison
TCANF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCANF stands at 53.5B. In comparison, PBNAF has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, TCANF is priced at $5.39, while PBNAF trades at $17.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.12, whereas PBNAF's P/E ratio is 9.68. In terms of profitability, TCANF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PBNAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TCANF and PBNAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TCANF vs PMBPF Comparison
TCANF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCANF stands at 53.5B. In comparison, PMBPF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCANF is priced at $5.39, while PMBPF trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.12, whereas PMBPF's P/E ratio is 8.19. In terms of profitability, TCANF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PMBPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TCANF is less volatile compared to PMBPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCANF.
TCANF vs KEYUF Comparison
TCANF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCANF stands at 53.5B. In comparison, KEYUF has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCANF is priced at $5.39, while KEYUF trades at $30.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.12, whereas KEYUF's P/E ratio is 17.85. In terms of profitability, TCANF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KEYUF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TCANF and KEYUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TCANF vs EQTNP Comparison
TCANF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCANF stands at 53.5B. In comparison, EQTNP has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, TCANF is priced at $5.39, while EQTNP trades at $22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.12, whereas EQTNP's P/E ratio is -6.91. In terms of profitability, TCANF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EQTNP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TCANF is less volatile compared to EQTNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCANF.
TCANF vs VOPKY Comparison
TCANF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCANF stands at 53.5B. In comparison, VOPKY has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TCANF is priced at $5.39, while VOPKY trades at $44.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.12, whereas VOPKY's P/E ratio is 12.48. In terms of profitability, TCANF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VOPKY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TCANF is less volatile compared to VOPKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCANF.
TCANF vs FRVWY Comparison
TCANF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCANF stands at 53.5B. In comparison, FRVWY has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TCANF is priced at $5.39, while FRVWY trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.12, whereas FRVWY's P/E ratio is 28.03. In terms of profitability, TCANF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FRVWY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TCANF is less volatile compared to FRVWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCANF.
TCANF vs VOPKF Comparison
TCANF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCANF stands at 53.5B. In comparison, VOPKF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCANF is priced at $5.39, while VOPKF trades at $45.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.12, whereas VOPKF's P/E ratio is 12.75. In terms of profitability, TCANF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VOPKF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TCANF is less volatile compared to VOPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCANF.
TCANF vs TPZEF Comparison
TCANF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCANF stands at 53.5B. In comparison, TPZEF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TCANF is priced at $5.39, while TPZEF trades at $18.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.12, whereas TPZEF's P/E ratio is 72.27. In terms of profitability, TCANF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TPZEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TCANF and TPZEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TCANF vs GBNXF Comparison
TCANF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCANF stands at 53.5B. In comparison, GBNXF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCANF is priced at $5.39, while GBNXF trades at $17.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.12, whereas GBNXF's P/E ratio is 24.18. In terms of profitability, TCANF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GBNXF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TCANF is less volatile compared to GBNXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCANF.
TCANF vs SOCGP Comparison
TCANF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCANF stands at 53.5B. In comparison, SOCGP has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCANF is priced at $5.39, while SOCGP trades at $25.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.12, whereas SOCGP's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, TCANF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SOCGP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TCANF and SOCGP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TCANF vs SPKOY Comparison
TCANF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCANF stands at 53.5B. In comparison, SPKOY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TCANF is priced at $5.39, while SPKOY trades at $24.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.12, whereas SPKOY's P/E ratio is 9.98. In terms of profitability, TCANF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SPKOY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TCANF is less volatile compared to SPKOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCANF.
TCANF vs FDVWF Comparison
TCANF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCANF stands at 53.5B. In comparison, FDVWF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCANF is priced at $5.39, while FDVWF trades at $65.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.12, whereas FDVWF's P/E ratio is 26.72. In terms of profitability, TCANF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FDVWF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TCANF and FDVWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TCANF vs SNPKF Comparison
TCANF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCANF stands at 53.5B. In comparison, SNPKF has a market cap of 945.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TCANF is priced at $5.39, while SNPKF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.12, whereas SNPKF's P/E ratio is 5.43. In terms of profitability, TCANF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SNPKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCANF and SNPKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TCANF vs OGSRW Comparison
TCANF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCANF stands at 53.5B. In comparison, OGSRW has a market cap of 88.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TCANF is priced at $5.39, while OGSRW trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.12, whereas OGSRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCANF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OGSRW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TCANF is less volatile compared to OGSRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCANF.
TCANF vs TWMIF Comparison
TCANF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCANF stands at 53.5B. In comparison, TWMIF has a market cap of 59.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TCANF is priced at $5.39, while TWMIF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.12, whereas TWMIF's P/E ratio is -1.97. In terms of profitability, TCANF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TWMIF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TCANF is less volatile compared to TWMIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCANF.
TCANF vs AVACF Comparison
TCANF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCANF stands at 53.5B. In comparison, AVACF has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TCANF is priced at $5.39, while AVACF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.12, whereas AVACF's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, TCANF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AVACF's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, TCANF is less volatile compared to AVACF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCANF.
TCANF vs TTNN Comparison
TCANF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCANF stands at 53.5B. In comparison, TTNN has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TCANF is priced at $5.39, while TTNN trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.12, whereas TTNN's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, TCANF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TTNN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TCANF and TTNN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TCANF vs MRGE Comparison
TCANF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCANF stands at 53.5B. In comparison, MRGE has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, TCANF is priced at $5.39, while MRGE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.12, whereas MRGE's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, TCANF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MRGE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TCANF and MRGE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TCANF vs CWPE Comparison
TCANF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCANF stands at 53.5B. In comparison, CWPE has a market cap of 434.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TCANF is priced at $5.39, while CWPE trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.12, whereas CWPE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCANF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CWPE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TCANF is less volatile compared to CWPE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCANF.
TCANF vs GMLPF Comparison
TCANF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCANF stands at 53.5B. In comparison, GMLPF has a market cap of 65.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TCANF is priced at $5.39, while GMLPF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.12, whereas GMLPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCANF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GMLPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCANF is less volatile compared to GMLPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCANF.
TCANF vs LOGL Comparison
TCANF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCANF stands at 53.5B. In comparison, LOGL has a market cap of 9.4K. Regarding current trading prices, TCANF is priced at $5.39, while LOGL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.12, whereas LOGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCANF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LOGL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCANF is less volatile compared to LOGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCANF.
TCANF vs FLST Comparison
TCANF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCANF stands at 53.5B. In comparison, FLST has a market cap of 400. Regarding current trading prices, TCANF is priced at $5.39, while FLST trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.12, whereas FLST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCANF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FLST's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, TCANF is less volatile compared to FLST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCANF.
TCANF vs TIDE Comparison
TCANF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCANF stands at 53.5B. In comparison, TIDE has a market cap of 250. Regarding current trading prices, TCANF is priced at $5.39, while TIDE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.12, whereas TIDE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TCANF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TIDE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCANF and TIDE have similar daily volatility (0.00).