TBO Tek Ltd.
TBO Tek Ltd. (TBOTEK.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TBOTEK.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TBOTEK.NS | ₹1,375.40 | +1.25% | 142.6B | 59.13 | ₹22.63 | N/A |
| THOMASCOOK.BO | ₹109.40 | -1.40% | 50.9B | 20.18 | ₹5.42 | +0.41% |
| THOMASCOOK.NS | ₹109.45 | -1.29% | 50.9B | 20.78 | ₹5.26 | +0.41% |
| EASEMYTRIP.BO | ₹9.23 | -0.75% | 33.4B | -34.00 | -₹0.27 | N/A |
| EASEMYTRIP.NS | ₹9.22 | -0.86% | 33.2B | -33.85 | -₹0.27 | N/A |
| YATRA.NS | ₹153.62 | +4.34% | 22.5B | 41.78 | ₹3.43 | N/A |
| YATRA.BO | ₹154.15 | +4.76% | 22.5B | 41.73 | ₹3.43 | N/A |
| BENARAS.BO | ₹9,505.70 | +0.03% | 12.4B | 28.08 | ₹338.40 | +0.26% |
| UPHOT.BO | ₹1,435.00 | +4.85% | 8.1B | 26.59 | ₹56.53 | N/A |
| SAYAJIHOTL.BO | ₹289.90 | +0.00% | 5B | -29.86 | -₹9.51 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TBOTEK.NS vs THOMASCOOK.BO Comparison February 2026
TBOTEK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBOTEK.NS stands at 142.6B. In comparison, THOMASCOOK.BO has a market cap of 50.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TBOTEK.NS is priced at ₹1,375.40, while THOMASCOOK.BO trades at ₹109.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBOTEK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.13, whereas THOMASCOOK.BO's P/E ratio is 20.18. In terms of profitability, TBOTEK.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to THOMASCOOK.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TBOTEK.NS is less volatile compared to THOMASCOOK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBOTEK.NS.Check THOMASCOOK.BO's competition here
TBOTEK.NS vs THOMASCOOK.NS Comparison February 2026
TBOTEK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBOTEK.NS stands at 142.6B. In comparison, THOMASCOOK.NS has a market cap of 50.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TBOTEK.NS is priced at ₹1,375.40, while THOMASCOOK.NS trades at ₹109.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBOTEK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.13, whereas THOMASCOOK.NS's P/E ratio is 20.78. In terms of profitability, TBOTEK.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to THOMASCOOK.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TBOTEK.NS is less volatile compared to THOMASCOOK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBOTEK.NS.Check THOMASCOOK.NS's competition here
TBOTEK.NS vs EASEMYTRIP.BO Comparison February 2026
TBOTEK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBOTEK.NS stands at 142.6B. In comparison, EASEMYTRIP.BO has a market cap of 33.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TBOTEK.NS is priced at ₹1,375.40, while EASEMYTRIP.BO trades at ₹9.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBOTEK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.13, whereas EASEMYTRIP.BO's P/E ratio is -34.00. In terms of profitability, TBOTEK.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EASEMYTRIP.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TBOTEK.NS is less volatile compared to EASEMYTRIP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBOTEK.NS.Check EASEMYTRIP.BO's competition here
TBOTEK.NS vs EASEMYTRIP.NS Comparison February 2026
TBOTEK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBOTEK.NS stands at 142.6B. In comparison, EASEMYTRIP.NS has a market cap of 33.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TBOTEK.NS is priced at ₹1,375.40, while EASEMYTRIP.NS trades at ₹9.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBOTEK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.13, whereas EASEMYTRIP.NS's P/E ratio is -33.85. In terms of profitability, TBOTEK.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EASEMYTRIP.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TBOTEK.NS is less volatile compared to EASEMYTRIP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBOTEK.NS.Check EASEMYTRIP.NS's competition here
TBOTEK.NS vs YATRA.NS Comparison February 2026
TBOTEK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBOTEK.NS stands at 142.6B. In comparison, YATRA.NS has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TBOTEK.NS is priced at ₹1,375.40, while YATRA.NS trades at ₹153.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBOTEK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.13, whereas YATRA.NS's P/E ratio is 41.78. In terms of profitability, TBOTEK.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to YATRA.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TBOTEK.NS is less volatile compared to YATRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBOTEK.NS.Check YATRA.NS's competition here
TBOTEK.NS vs YATRA.BO Comparison February 2026
TBOTEK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBOTEK.NS stands at 142.6B. In comparison, YATRA.BO has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TBOTEK.NS is priced at ₹1,375.40, while YATRA.BO trades at ₹154.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBOTEK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.13, whereas YATRA.BO's P/E ratio is 41.73. In terms of profitability, TBOTEK.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to YATRA.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TBOTEK.NS is less volatile compared to YATRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBOTEK.NS.Check YATRA.BO's competition here
TBOTEK.NS vs BENARAS.BO Comparison February 2026
TBOTEK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBOTEK.NS stands at 142.6B. In comparison, BENARAS.BO has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TBOTEK.NS is priced at ₹1,375.40, while BENARAS.BO trades at ₹9,505.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBOTEK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.13, whereas BENARAS.BO's P/E ratio is 28.08. In terms of profitability, TBOTEK.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BENARAS.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TBOTEK.NS is more volatile compared to BENARAS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBOTEK.NS.Check BENARAS.BO's competition here
TBOTEK.NS vs UPHOT.BO Comparison February 2026
TBOTEK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBOTEK.NS stands at 142.6B. In comparison, UPHOT.BO has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TBOTEK.NS is priced at ₹1,375.40, while UPHOT.BO trades at ₹1,435.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBOTEK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.13, whereas UPHOT.BO's P/E ratio is 26.59. In terms of profitability, TBOTEK.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to UPHOT.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TBOTEK.NS is more volatile compared to UPHOT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBOTEK.NS.Check UPHOT.BO's competition here
TBOTEK.NS vs SAYAJIHOTL.BO Comparison February 2026
TBOTEK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBOTEK.NS stands at 142.6B. In comparison, SAYAJIHOTL.BO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, TBOTEK.NS is priced at ₹1,375.40, while SAYAJIHOTL.BO trades at ₹289.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBOTEK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.13, whereas SAYAJIHOTL.BO's P/E ratio is -29.86. In terms of profitability, TBOTEK.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SAYAJIHOTL.BO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TBOTEK.NS is more volatile compared to SAYAJIHOTL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBOTEK.NS.Check SAYAJIHOTL.BO's competition here
TBOTEK.NS vs ESPIRE.BO Comparison February 2026
TBOTEK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBOTEK.NS stands at 142.6B. In comparison, ESPIRE.BO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TBOTEK.NS is priced at ₹1,375.40, while ESPIRE.BO trades at ₹300.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBOTEK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.13, whereas ESPIRE.BO's P/E ratio is 155.36. In terms of profitability, TBOTEK.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ESPIRE.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TBOTEK.NS is less volatile compared to ESPIRE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBOTEK.NS.Check ESPIRE.BO's competition here
TBOTEK.NS vs SINCLAIR.BO Comparison February 2026
TBOTEK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBOTEK.NS stands at 142.6B. In comparison, SINCLAIR.BO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TBOTEK.NS is priced at ₹1,375.40, while SINCLAIR.BO trades at ₹75.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBOTEK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.13, whereas SINCLAIR.BO's P/E ratio is 27.59. In terms of profitability, TBOTEK.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SINCLAIR.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TBOTEK.NS is less volatile compared to SINCLAIR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBOTEK.NS.Check SINCLAIR.BO's competition here
TBOTEK.NS vs EMERALL.BO Comparison February 2026
TBOTEK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBOTEK.NS stands at 142.6B. In comparison, EMERALL.BO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TBOTEK.NS is priced at ₹1,375.40, while EMERALL.BO trades at ₹184.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBOTEK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.13, whereas EMERALL.BO's P/E ratio is -27.17. In terms of profitability, TBOTEK.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EMERALL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TBOTEK.NS is less volatile compared to EMERALL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBOTEK.NS.Check EMERALL.BO's competition here
TBOTEK.NS vs GRAVISSHO.BO Comparison February 2026
TBOTEK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBOTEK.NS stands at 142.6B. In comparison, GRAVISSHO.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TBOTEK.NS is priced at ₹1,375.40, while GRAVISSHO.BO trades at ₹33.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBOTEK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.13, whereas GRAVISSHO.BO's P/E ratio is -90.70. In terms of profitability, TBOTEK.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GRAVISSHO.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TBOTEK.NS is less volatile compared to GRAVISSHO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBOTEK.NS.Check GRAVISSHO.BO's competition here
TBOTEK.NS vs PHOENIXTN.BO Comparison February 2026
TBOTEK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBOTEK.NS stands at 142.6B. In comparison, PHOENIXTN.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TBOTEK.NS is priced at ₹1,375.40, while PHOENIXTN.BO trades at ₹105.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBOTEK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.13, whereas PHOENIXTN.BO's P/E ratio is 3.06. In terms of profitability, TBOTEK.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PHOENIXTN.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TBOTEK.NS is less volatile compared to PHOENIXTN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBOTEK.NS.Check PHOENIXTN.BO's competition here
TBOTEK.NS vs SAVERA.BO Comparison February 2026
TBOTEK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBOTEK.NS stands at 142.6B. In comparison, SAVERA.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TBOTEK.NS is priced at ₹1,375.40, while SAVERA.BO trades at ₹151.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBOTEK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.13, whereas SAVERA.BO's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, TBOTEK.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SAVERA.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TBOTEK.NS is more volatile compared to SAVERA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBOTEK.NS.Check SAVERA.BO's competition here
TBOTEK.NS vs HBESD.BO Comparison February 2026
TBOTEK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBOTEK.NS stands at 142.6B. In comparison, HBESD.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TBOTEK.NS is priced at ₹1,375.40, while HBESD.BO trades at ₹82.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBOTEK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.13, whereas HBESD.BO's P/E ratio is 13.62. In terms of profitability, TBOTEK.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HBESD.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TBOTEK.NS is more volatile compared to HBESD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBOTEK.NS.Check HBESD.BO's competition here
TBOTEK.NS vs CHLLTD.BO Comparison February 2026
TBOTEK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBOTEK.NS stands at 142.6B. In comparison, CHLLTD.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TBOTEK.NS is priced at ₹1,375.40, while CHLLTD.BO trades at ₹29.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBOTEK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.13, whereas CHLLTD.BO's P/E ratio is -7.02. In terms of profitability, TBOTEK.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CHLLTD.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TBOTEK.NS is less volatile compared to CHLLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBOTEK.NS.Check CHLLTD.BO's competition here
TBOTEK.NS vs GUJHOTE.BO Comparison February 2026
TBOTEK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBOTEK.NS stands at 142.6B. In comparison, GUJHOTE.BO has a market cap of 716.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TBOTEK.NS is priced at ₹1,375.40, while GUJHOTE.BO trades at ₹186.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBOTEK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.13, whereas GUJHOTE.BO's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, TBOTEK.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GUJHOTE.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TBOTEK.NS is less volatile compared to GUJHOTE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBOTEK.NS.Check GUJHOTE.BO's competition here
TBOTEK.NS vs RAYALEMA.BO Comparison February 2026
TBOTEK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBOTEK.NS stands at 142.6B. In comparison, RAYALEMA.BO has a market cap of 640.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TBOTEK.NS is priced at ₹1,375.40, while RAYALEMA.BO trades at ₹34.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBOTEK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.13, whereas RAYALEMA.BO's P/E ratio is 25.42. In terms of profitability, TBOTEK.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RAYALEMA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TBOTEK.NS is less volatile compared to RAYALEMA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBOTEK.NS.Check RAYALEMA.BO's competition here
TBOTEK.NS vs JINDHOT.BO Comparison February 2026
TBOTEK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBOTEK.NS stands at 142.6B. In comparison, JINDHOT.BO has a market cap of 452.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TBOTEK.NS is priced at ₹1,375.40, while JINDHOT.BO trades at ₹65.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBOTEK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.13, whereas JINDHOT.BO's P/E ratio is 18.43. In terms of profitability, TBOTEK.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to JINDHOT.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TBOTEK.NS is less volatile compared to JINDHOT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBOTEK.NS.Check JINDHOT.BO's competition here
TBOTEK.NS vs PECOS.BO Comparison February 2026
TBOTEK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBOTEK.NS stands at 142.6B. In comparison, PECOS.BO has a market cap of 423.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TBOTEK.NS is priced at ₹1,375.40, while PECOS.BO trades at ₹323.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBOTEK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.13, whereas PECOS.BO's P/E ratio is 31.76. In terms of profitability, TBOTEK.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PECOS.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TBOTEK.NS is more volatile compared to PECOS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBOTEK.NS.Check PECOS.BO's competition here
TBOTEK.NS vs COX&KINGS.NS Comparison February 2026
TBOTEK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBOTEK.NS stands at 142.6B. In comparison, COX&KINGS.NS has a market cap of 309M. Regarding current trading prices, TBOTEK.NS is priced at ₹1,375.40, while COX&KINGS.NS trades at ₹1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBOTEK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.13, whereas COX&KINGS.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBOTEK.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to COX&KINGS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TBOTEK.NS is more volatile compared to COX&KINGS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBOTEK.NS.Check COX&KINGS.NS's competition here
TBOTEK.NS vs PGCRL.BO Comparison February 2026
TBOTEK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBOTEK.NS stands at 142.6B. In comparison, PGCRL.BO has a market cap of 267.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TBOTEK.NS is priced at ₹1,375.40, while PGCRL.BO trades at ₹94.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBOTEK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.13, whereas PGCRL.BO's P/E ratio is -111.17. In terms of profitability, TBOTEK.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PGCRL.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TBOTEK.NS is less volatile compared to PGCRL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBOTEK.NS.Check PGCRL.BO's competition here
TBOTEK.NS vs ARUNAHTEL.BO Comparison February 2026
TBOTEK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBOTEK.NS stands at 142.6B. In comparison, ARUNAHTEL.BO has a market cap of 264.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TBOTEK.NS is priced at ₹1,375.40, while ARUNAHTEL.BO trades at ₹8.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBOTEK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.13, whereas ARUNAHTEL.BO's P/E ratio is 5.86. In terms of profitability, TBOTEK.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ARUNAHTEL.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TBOTEK.NS is less volatile compared to ARUNAHTEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBOTEK.NS.Check ARUNAHTEL.BO's competition here
TBOTEK.NS vs HOWARHO.BO Comparison February 2026
TBOTEK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBOTEK.NS stands at 142.6B. In comparison, HOWARHO.BO has a market cap of 243.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TBOTEK.NS is priced at ₹1,375.40, while HOWARHO.BO trades at ₹26.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBOTEK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.13, whereas HOWARHO.BO's P/E ratio is 54.49. In terms of profitability, TBOTEK.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HOWARHO.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TBOTEK.NS is less volatile compared to HOWARHO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBOTEK.NS.Check HOWARHO.BO's competition here
TBOTEK.NS vs RELIABVEN.BO Comparison February 2026
TBOTEK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBOTEK.NS stands at 142.6B. In comparison, RELIABVEN.BO has a market cap of 219.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TBOTEK.NS is priced at ₹1,375.40, while RELIABVEN.BO trades at ₹21.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBOTEK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.13, whereas RELIABVEN.BO's P/E ratio is -664.00. In terms of profitability, TBOTEK.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RELIABVEN.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TBOTEK.NS is less volatile compared to RELIABVEN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBOTEK.NS.Check RELIABVEN.BO's competition here
TBOTEK.NS vs POLOHOT.BO Comparison February 2026
TBOTEK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBOTEK.NS stands at 142.6B. In comparison, POLOHOT.BO has a market cap of 204.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TBOTEK.NS is priced at ₹1,375.40, while POLOHOT.BO trades at ₹9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBOTEK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.13, whereas POLOHOT.BO's P/E ratio is -27.73. In terms of profitability, TBOTEK.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to POLOHOT.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TBOTEK.NS is less volatile compared to POLOHOT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBOTEK.NS.Check POLOHOT.BO's competition here
TBOTEK.NS vs BESTEAST.BO Comparison February 2026
TBOTEK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBOTEK.NS stands at 142.6B. In comparison, BESTEAST.BO has a market cap of 195.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TBOTEK.NS is priced at ₹1,375.40, while BESTEAST.BO trades at ₹11.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBOTEK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.13, whereas BESTEAST.BO's P/E ratio is -82.71. In terms of profitability, TBOTEK.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BESTEAST.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TBOTEK.NS is less volatile compared to BESTEAST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBOTEK.NS.Check BESTEAST.BO's competition here
TBOTEK.NS vs HOTLSILV.BO Comparison February 2026
TBOTEK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBOTEK.NS stands at 142.6B. In comparison, HOTLSILV.BO has a market cap of 189M. Regarding current trading prices, TBOTEK.NS is priced at ₹1,375.40, while HOTLSILV.BO trades at ₹11.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBOTEK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.13, whereas HOTLSILV.BO's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, TBOTEK.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HOTLSILV.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TBOTEK.NS is less volatile compared to HOTLSILV.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBOTEK.NS.Check HOTLSILV.BO's competition here
TBOTEK.NS vs VELHO.BO Comparison February 2026
TBOTEK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBOTEK.NS stands at 142.6B. In comparison, VELHO.BO has a market cap of 183.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TBOTEK.NS is priced at ₹1,375.40, while VELHO.BO trades at ₹6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBOTEK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.13, whereas VELHO.BO's P/E ratio is -1.41. In terms of profitability, TBOTEK.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VELHO.BO's ROE of +2.95%. Regarding short-term risk, TBOTEK.NS is less volatile compared to VELHO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBOTEK.NS.Check VELHO.BO's competition here
TBOTEK.NS vs CINDHO.BO Comparison February 2026
TBOTEK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBOTEK.NS stands at 142.6B. In comparison, CINDHO.BO has a market cap of 180.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TBOTEK.NS is priced at ₹1,375.40, while CINDHO.BO trades at ₹52.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBOTEK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.13, whereas CINDHO.BO's P/E ratio is 72.77. In terms of profitability, TBOTEK.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CINDHO.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TBOTEK.NS is less volatile compared to CINDHO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBOTEK.NS.Check CINDHO.BO's competition here
TBOTEK.NS vs RASRESOR.BO Comparison February 2026
TBOTEK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBOTEK.NS stands at 142.6B. In comparison, RASRESOR.BO has a market cap of 154.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TBOTEK.NS is priced at ₹1,375.40, while RASRESOR.BO trades at ₹38.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBOTEK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.13, whereas RASRESOR.BO's P/E ratio is 50.65. In terms of profitability, TBOTEK.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RASRESOR.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TBOTEK.NS is less volatile compared to RASRESOR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBOTEK.NS.Check RASRESOR.BO's competition here
TBOTEK.NS vs LORDSHOTL.BO Comparison February 2026
TBOTEK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBOTEK.NS stands at 142.6B. In comparison, LORDSHOTL.BO has a market cap of 104.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TBOTEK.NS is priced at ₹1,375.40, while LORDSHOTL.BO trades at ₹14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBOTEK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.13, whereas LORDSHOTL.BO's P/E ratio is 45.19. In terms of profitability, TBOTEK.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LORDSHOTL.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TBOTEK.NS is more volatile compared to LORDSHOTL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBOTEK.NS.Check LORDSHOTL.BO's competition here
TBOTEK.NS vs SAILANI.BO Comparison February 2026
TBOTEK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBOTEK.NS stands at 142.6B. In comparison, SAILANI.BO has a market cap of 84.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TBOTEK.NS is priced at ₹1,375.40, while SAILANI.BO trades at ₹18.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBOTEK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.13, whereas SAILANI.BO's P/E ratio is 34.71. In terms of profitability, TBOTEK.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SAILANI.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TBOTEK.NS is more volatile compared to SAILANI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBOTEK.NS.Check SAILANI.BO's competition here
TBOTEK.NS vs WOODSVILA.BO Comparison February 2026
TBOTEK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBOTEK.NS stands at 142.6B. In comparison, WOODSVILA.BO has a market cap of 83.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TBOTEK.NS is priced at ₹1,375.40, while WOODSVILA.BO trades at ₹13.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBOTEK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.13, whereas WOODSVILA.BO's P/E ratio is -27.33. In terms of profitability, TBOTEK.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WOODSVILA.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TBOTEK.NS is more volatile compared to WOODSVILA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBOTEK.NS.Check WOODSVILA.BO's competition here
TBOTEK.NS vs SILVERPRL.BO Comparison February 2026
TBOTEK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBOTEK.NS stands at 142.6B. In comparison, SILVERPRL.BO has a market cap of 57.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TBOTEK.NS is priced at ₹1,375.40, while SILVERPRL.BO trades at ₹7.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBOTEK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.13, whereas SILVERPRL.BO's P/E ratio is -181.75. In terms of profitability, TBOTEK.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SILVERPRL.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TBOTEK.NS is less volatile compared to SILVERPRL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBOTEK.NS.Check SILVERPRL.BO's competition here