Zumtobel Group AG
Zumtobel Group AG (T9Z.DE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (T9Z.DE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T9Z.DE | €4.28 | -2.17% | 181M | 11.88 | €0.36 | +3.51% |
| DLSF.F | €19.30 | +0.00% | 241.1B | 643.33 | €0.03 | N/A |
| DLS.F | €6.85 | -4.86% | 91.9B | 137.00 | €0.05 | N/A |
| LU2.DE | €577.80 | +2.27% | 41.3B | 191.96 | €3.01 | N/A |
| PLUN.F | €1.93 | +3.04% | 2.2B | -1.57 | -€1.23 | N/A |
| PLUN.DE | €1.90 | -0.55% | 2.2B | -1.55 | -€1.23 | N/A |
| 6I4.F | €2.57 | +5.33% | 224.5M | 51.30 | €0.05 | N/A |
| KTEK.DE | €15.10 | +0.33% | 218.1M | -167.78 | -€0.09 | N/A |
| T9Z.F | €3.83 | +0.00% | 162.2M | 14.19 | €0.27 | +3.92% |
| VAR1.DE | €1.21 | -3.04% | 51.6M | -0.17 | -€7.18 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
T9Z.DE vs DLSF.F Comparison April 2026
T9Z.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T9Z.DE stands at 181M. In comparison, DLSF.F has a market cap of 241.1B. Regarding current trading prices, T9Z.DE is priced at €4.28, while DLSF.F trades at €19.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T9Z.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 11.88, whereas DLSF.F's P/E ratio is 643.33. In terms of profitability, T9Z.DE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DLSF.F's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, T9Z.DE is less volatile compared to DLSF.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T9Z.DE.Check DLSF.F's competition here
T9Z.DE vs DLS.F Comparison April 2026
T9Z.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T9Z.DE stands at 181M. In comparison, DLS.F has a market cap of 91.9B. Regarding current trading prices, T9Z.DE is priced at €4.28, while DLS.F trades at €6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T9Z.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 11.88, whereas DLS.F's P/E ratio is 137.00. In terms of profitability, T9Z.DE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DLS.F's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, T9Z.DE and DLS.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DLS.F's competition here
T9Z.DE vs LU2.DE Comparison April 2026
T9Z.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T9Z.DE stands at 181M. In comparison, LU2.DE has a market cap of 41.3B. Regarding current trading prices, T9Z.DE is priced at €4.28, while LU2.DE trades at €577.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T9Z.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 11.88, whereas LU2.DE's P/E ratio is 191.96. In terms of profitability, T9Z.DE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LU2.DE's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, T9Z.DE is less volatile compared to LU2.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T9Z.DE.Check LU2.DE's competition here
T9Z.DE vs PLUN.F Comparison April 2026
T9Z.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T9Z.DE stands at 181M. In comparison, PLUN.F has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, T9Z.DE is priced at €4.28, while PLUN.F trades at €1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T9Z.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 11.88, whereas PLUN.F's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, T9Z.DE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PLUN.F's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, T9Z.DE is less volatile compared to PLUN.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T9Z.DE.Check PLUN.F's competition here
T9Z.DE vs PLUN.DE Comparison April 2026
T9Z.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T9Z.DE stands at 181M. In comparison, PLUN.DE has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, T9Z.DE is priced at €4.28, while PLUN.DE trades at €1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T9Z.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 11.88, whereas PLUN.DE's P/E ratio is -1.55. In terms of profitability, T9Z.DE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PLUN.DE's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, T9Z.DE is less volatile compared to PLUN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T9Z.DE.Check PLUN.DE's competition here
T9Z.DE vs 6I4.F Comparison April 2026
T9Z.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T9Z.DE stands at 181M. In comparison, 6I4.F has a market cap of 224.5M. Regarding current trading prices, T9Z.DE is priced at €4.28, while 6I4.F trades at €2.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T9Z.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 11.88, whereas 6I4.F's P/E ratio is 51.30. In terms of profitability, T9Z.DE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 6I4.F's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, T9Z.DE is less volatile compared to 6I4.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T9Z.DE.Check 6I4.F's competition here
T9Z.DE vs KTEK.DE Comparison April 2026
T9Z.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T9Z.DE stands at 181M. In comparison, KTEK.DE has a market cap of 218.1M. Regarding current trading prices, T9Z.DE is priced at €4.28, while KTEK.DE trades at €15.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T9Z.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 11.88, whereas KTEK.DE's P/E ratio is -167.78. In terms of profitability, T9Z.DE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KTEK.DE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, T9Z.DE is less volatile compared to KTEK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T9Z.DE.Check KTEK.DE's competition here
T9Z.DE vs T9Z.F Comparison April 2026
T9Z.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T9Z.DE stands at 181M. In comparison, T9Z.F has a market cap of 162.2M. Regarding current trading prices, T9Z.DE is priced at €4.28, while T9Z.F trades at €3.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T9Z.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 11.88, whereas T9Z.F's P/E ratio is 14.19. In terms of profitability, T9Z.DE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to T9Z.F's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, T9Z.DE and T9Z.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check T9Z.F's competition here
T9Z.DE vs VAR1.DE Comparison April 2026
T9Z.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T9Z.DE stands at 181M. In comparison, VAR1.DE has a market cap of 51.6M. Regarding current trading prices, T9Z.DE is priced at €4.28, while VAR1.DE trades at €1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T9Z.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 11.88, whereas VAR1.DE's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, T9Z.DE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VAR1.DE's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, T9Z.DE is less volatile compared to VAR1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T9Z.DE.Check VAR1.DE's competition here
T9Z.DE vs HNL.DE Comparison April 2026
T9Z.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T9Z.DE stands at 181M. In comparison, HNL.DE has a market cap of 50.3M. Regarding current trading prices, T9Z.DE is priced at €4.28, while HNL.DE trades at €8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T9Z.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 11.88, whereas HNL.DE's P/E ratio is -12.39. In terms of profitability, T9Z.DE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HNL.DE's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, T9Z.DE is less volatile compared to HNL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T9Z.DE.Check HNL.DE's competition here
T9Z.DE vs LMIA.F Comparison April 2026
T9Z.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T9Z.DE stands at 181M. In comparison, LMIA.F has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, T9Z.DE is priced at €4.28, while LMIA.F trades at €1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T9Z.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 11.88, whereas LMIA.F's P/E ratio is -2.08. In terms of profitability, T9Z.DE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LMIA.F's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, T9Z.DE is less volatile compared to LMIA.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T9Z.DE.Check LMIA.F's competition here
T9Z.DE vs LMIA.DE Comparison April 2026
T9Z.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T9Z.DE stands at 181M. In comparison, LMIA.DE has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, T9Z.DE is priced at €4.28, while LMIA.DE trades at €1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T9Z.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 11.88, whereas LMIA.DE's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, T9Z.DE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LMIA.DE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, T9Z.DE is less volatile compared to LMIA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T9Z.DE.Check LMIA.DE's competition here
T9Z.DE vs SLSA.DE Comparison April 2026
T9Z.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T9Z.DE stands at 181M. In comparison, SLSA.DE has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, T9Z.DE is priced at €4.28, while SLSA.DE trades at €1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T9Z.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 11.88, whereas SLSA.DE's P/E ratio is -34.75. In terms of profitability, T9Z.DE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SLSA.DE's ROE of +1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, T9Z.DE and SLSA.DE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SLSA.DE's competition here
T9Z.DE vs 1O2.F Comparison April 2026
T9Z.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T9Z.DE stands at 181M. In comparison, 1O2.F has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, T9Z.DE is priced at €4.28, while 1O2.F trades at €0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T9Z.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 11.88, whereas 1O2.F's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, T9Z.DE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 1O2.F's ROE of +197.06%. Regarding short-term risk, T9Z.DE is less volatile compared to 1O2.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T9Z.DE.Check 1O2.F's competition here
T9Z.DE vs LEO.DE Comparison April 2026
T9Z.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T9Z.DE stands at 181M. In comparison, LEO.DE has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, T9Z.DE is priced at €4.28, while LEO.DE trades at €0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T9Z.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 11.88, whereas LEO.DE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, T9Z.DE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LEO.DE's ROE of +8.06%. Regarding short-term risk, T9Z.DE is less volatile compared to LEO.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T9Z.DE.Check LEO.DE's competition here
T9Z.DE vs 0E9.F Comparison April 2026
T9Z.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T9Z.DE stands at 181M. In comparison, 0E9.F has a market cap of 745.3K. Regarding current trading prices, T9Z.DE is priced at €4.28, while 0E9.F trades at €0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T9Z.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 11.88, whereas 0E9.F's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, T9Z.DE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0E9.F's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, T9Z.DE is less volatile compared to 0E9.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T9Z.DE.Check 0E9.F's competition here
T9Z.DE vs C0M.F Comparison April 2026
T9Z.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T9Z.DE stands at 181M. In comparison, C0M.F has a market cap of 329.5K. Regarding current trading prices, T9Z.DE is priced at €4.28, while C0M.F trades at €0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T9Z.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 11.88, whereas C0M.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, T9Z.DE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to C0M.F's ROE of -2.18%. Regarding short-term risk, T9Z.DE and C0M.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check C0M.F's competition here
T9Z.DE vs P6K0.DE Comparison April 2026
T9Z.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T9Z.DE stands at 181M. In comparison, P6K0.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, T9Z.DE is priced at €4.28, while P6K0.DE trades at €0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T9Z.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 11.88, whereas P6K0.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, T9Z.DE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to P6K0.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, T9Z.DE is less volatile compared to P6K0.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T9Z.DE.Check P6K0.DE's competition here
T9Z.DE vs ASL.DE Comparison April 2026
T9Z.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T9Z.DE stands at 181M. In comparison, ASL.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, T9Z.DE is priced at €4.28, while ASL.DE trades at €121.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T9Z.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 11.88, whereas ASL.DE's P/E ratio is -41.06. In terms of profitability, T9Z.DE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ASL.DE's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, T9Z.DE and ASL.DE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ASL.DE's competition here
T9Z.DE vs ZSOL.DE Comparison April 2026
T9Z.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T9Z.DE stands at 181M. In comparison, ZSOL.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, T9Z.DE is priced at €4.28, while ZSOL.DE trades at €1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T9Z.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 11.88, whereas ZSOL.DE's P/E ratio is -2.33. In terms of profitability, T9Z.DE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ZSOL.DE's ROE of +1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, T9Z.DE is less volatile compared to ZSOL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T9Z.DE.Check ZSOL.DE's competition here