Suzuki Motor Corporation

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, TOYOF has a market cap of 251.19B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while TOYOF trades at $19.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas TOYOF's P/E ratio is 7.24. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TOYOF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to TOYOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, BYDDF has a market cap of 161.61B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while BYDDF trades at $53.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas BYDDF's P/E ratio is 25.21. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BYDDF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to BYDDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, BYDDY has a market cap of 81.57B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while BYDDY trades at $106.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas BYDDY's P/E ratio is 25.04. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BYDDY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to BYDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, VWAGY has a market cap of 57.52B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while VWAGY trades at $11.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas VWAGY's P/E ratio is 5.46. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VWAGY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to VWAGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, VWAPY has a market cap of 57.28B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while VWAPY trades at $11.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas VWAPY's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VWAPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to VWAPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, VLKPF has a market cap of 57.16B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while VLKPF trades at $108.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas VLKPF's P/E ratio is 5.18. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VLKPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to VLKPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, VLKAF has a market cap of 56.68B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while VLKAF trades at $114.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas VLKAF's P/E ratio is 5.43. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VLKAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to VLKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, MBGAF has a market cap of 56.43B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while MBGAF trades at $58.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas MBGAF's P/E ratio is 5.71. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MBGAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to MBGAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, MBGYY has a market cap of 56.39B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while MBGYY trades at $14.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas MBGYY's P/E ratio is 5.72. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MBGYY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to MBGYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, BAMXF has a market cap of 55.18B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while BAMXF trades at $89.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas BAMXF's P/E ratio is 6.78. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BAMXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to BAMXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, BYMOF has a market cap of 54.39B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while BYMOF trades at $76.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas BYMOF's P/E ratio is 5.79. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BYMOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to BYMOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, DRPRF has a market cap of 48.35B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while DRPRF trades at $52.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas DRPRF's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DRPRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to DRPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, HNDAF has a market cap of 45.47B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while HNDAF trades at $9.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas HNDAF's P/E ratio is 6.20. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HNDAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is less volatile compared to HNDAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, MAHMF has a market cap of 42.03B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while MAHMF trades at $33.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas MAHMF's P/E ratio is 24.67. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MAHMF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is less volatile compared to MAHMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, TYIDY has a market cap of 36.88B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while TYIDY trades at $122.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas TYIDY's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TYIDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to TYIDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, HYMTF has a market cap of 36.87B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while HYMTF trades at $51.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas HYMTF's P/E ratio is 2.90. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HYMTF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is less volatile compared to HYMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, TYIDF has a market cap of 36.09B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while TYIDF trades at $119.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas TYIDF's P/E ratio is 20.09. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TYIDF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to TYIDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, SZKMF has a market cap of 24.89B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while SZKMF trades at $12.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas SZKMF's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SZKMF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to SZKMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, GELYF has a market cap of 24.39B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while GELYF trades at $2.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas GELYF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GELYF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to GELYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, GELYY has a market cap of 24.38B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while GELYY trades at $48.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas GELYY's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GELYY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to GELYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, DRPRY has a market cap of 24.10B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while DRPRY trades at $5.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas DRPRY's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DRPRY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to DRPRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, GWLLF has a market cap of 23.31B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while GWLLF trades at $1.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas GWLLF's P/E ratio is 7.65. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GWLLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to GWLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, HYMLF has a market cap of 22.32B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while HYMLF trades at $89.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas HYMLF's P/E ratio is 6.32. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HYMLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to HYMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, XPNGF has a market cap of 20.69B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while XPNGF trades at $10.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas XPNGF's P/E ratio is -25.90. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to XPNGF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is less volatile compared to XPNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, EXXRF has a market cap of 20.30B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while EXXRF trades at $94.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas EXXRF's P/E ratio is 1.25. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EXXRF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to EXXRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, BMWYY has a market cap of 18.66B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while BMWYY trades at $29.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas BMWYY's P/E ratio is 4.74. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BMWYY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to BMWYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, FOVSY has a market cap of 17.54B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while FOVSY trades at $124.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas FOVSY's P/E ratio is 103.26. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FOVSY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is less volatile compared to FOVSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, RNLSY has a market cap of 15.32B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while RNLSY trades at $10.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas RNLSY's P/E ratio is 17.98. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RNLSY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to RNLSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, RNSDF has a market cap of 14.56B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while RNSDF trades at $50.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas RNSDF's P/E ratio is 17.14. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RNSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to RNSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, GWLLY has a market cap of 14.23B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while GWLLY trades at $16.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas GWLLY's P/E ratio is 8.11. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GWLLY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to GWLLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, FUJHF has a market cap of 13.95B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while FUJHF trades at $19.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas FUJHF's P/E ratio is 5.05. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FUJHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to FUJHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, FUJHY has a market cap of 13.92B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while FUJHY trades at $9.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas FUJHY's P/E ratio is 5.01. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FUJHY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to FUJHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, POAHF has a market cap of 13.01B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while POAHF trades at $42.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas POAHF's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to POAHF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to POAHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, YAMHY has a market cap of 12.72B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while YAMHY trades at $17.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas YAMHY's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to YAMHY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is less volatile compared to YAMHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, ISUZY has a market cap of 9.79B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while ISUZY trades at $13.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas ISUZY's P/E ratio is 11.38. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ISUZY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to ISUZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, ISUZF has a market cap of 9.24B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while ISUZF trades at $13.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas ISUZF's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ISUZF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to ISUZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, GNZUF has a market cap of 9.16B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while GNZUF trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas GNZUF's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GNZUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is less volatile compared to GNZUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, NIOIF has a market cap of 8.74B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while NIOIF trades at $4.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas NIOIF's P/E ratio is -2.96. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NIOIF's ROE of -1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to NIOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, NSANY has a market cap of 8.47B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while NSANY trades at $4.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas NSANY's P/E ratio is 12.12. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NSANY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to NSANY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, NSANF has a market cap of 8.42B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while NSANF trades at $2.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas NSANF's P/E ratio is 12.05. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NSANF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to NSANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, JCYGY has a market cap of 7.81B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while JCYGY trades at $39.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas JCYGY's P/E ratio is 8.26. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JCYGY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to JCYGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, YMHAY has a market cap of 7.78B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while YMHAY trades at $15.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas YMHAY's P/E ratio is 10.40. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to YMHAY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to YMHAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, YAMHF has a market cap of 7.70B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while YAMHF trades at $7.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas YAMHF's P/E ratio is 10.23. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to YAMHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to YAMHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, JCYCF has a market cap of 7.07B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while JCYCF trades at $17.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas JCYCF's P/E ratio is 7.49. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JCYCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to JCYCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, POAHY has a market cap of 6.29B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while POAHY trades at $4.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas POAHY's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to POAHY's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to POAHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, VLVOF has a market cap of 5.92B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while VLVOF trades at $1.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas VLVOF's P/E ratio is 4.33. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VLVOF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to VLVOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, VLVCY has a market cap of 5.79B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while VLVCY trades at $3.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas VLVCY's P/E ratio is 4.23. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VLVCY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to VLVCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, IVCGF has a market cap of 4.57B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while IVCGF trades at $17.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas IVCGF's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IVCGF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to IVCGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, DNFGY has a market cap of 4.56B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while DNFGY trades at $26.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas DNFGY's P/E ratio is 532.20. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DNFGY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to DNFGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, DNFGF has a market cap of 4.29B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while DNFGF trades at $0.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas DNFGF's P/E ratio is -7.43. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DNFGF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to DNFGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, YADGF has a market cap of 3.95B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while YADGF trades at $1.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas YADGF's P/E ratio is 21.67. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to YADGF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is less volatile compared to YADGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, MZDAF has a market cap of 3.80B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while MZDAF trades at $6.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas MZDAF's P/E ratio is 4.10. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MZDAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to MZDAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, MZDAY has a market cap of 3.79B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while MZDAY trades at $3.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas MZDAY's P/E ratio is 4.12. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MZDAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to MZDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, MMTOF has a market cap of 3.72B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while MMTOF trades at $2.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas MMTOF's P/E ratio is 6.95. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MMTOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to MMTOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, SMEBF has a market cap of 2.86B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while SMEBF trades at $0.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas SMEBF's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SMEBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is less volatile compared to SMEBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, BCCMY has a market cap of 2.05B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while BCCMY trades at $2.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas BCCMY's P/E ratio is 15.44. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BCCMY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to BCCMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, BMCLF has a market cap of 2.03B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while BMCLF trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas BMCLF's P/E ratio is 12.65. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BMCLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to BMCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, HINOY has a market cap of 1.78B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while HINOY trades at $31.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas HINOY's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HINOY's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is less volatile compared to HINOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, BCAUF has a market cap of 1.72B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while BCAUF trades at $0.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas BCAUF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BCAUF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is less volatile compared to BCAUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, HINOF has a market cap of 1.64B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while HINOF trades at $2.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas HINOF's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HINOF's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is less volatile compared to HINOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, NFYEF has a market cap of 1.24B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while NFYEF trades at $10.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas NFYEF's P/E ratio is -346.33. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NFYEF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to NFYEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, AMGDF has a market cap of 1.16B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while AMGDF trades at $1.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas AMGDF's P/E ratio is -2.80. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMGDF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to AMGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, ARGGY has a market cap of 958.06M. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while ARGGY trades at $1.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas ARGGY's P/E ratio is -2.49. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ARGGY's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to ARGGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, NSNHF has a market cap of 866.90M. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while NSNHF trades at $6.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas NSNHF's P/E ratio is 640.00. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NSNHF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to NSNHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, PIAGF has a market cap of 710.66M. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while PIAGF trades at $1.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas PIAGF's P/E ratio is 9.48. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PIAGF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to PIAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, KRSOF has a market cap of 444.60M. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while KRSOF trades at $0.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas KRSOF's P/E ratio is 49.40. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KRSOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to KRSOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, RIDEQ has a market cap of 27.28M. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while RIDEQ trades at $1.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas RIDEQ's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RIDEQ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is less volatile compared to RIDEQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, FHYDF has a market cap of 25.89M. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while FHYDF trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas FHYDF's P/E ratio is -5.86. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FHYDF's ROE of +3.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to FHYDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, SEVCF has a market cap of 21.50M. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while SEVCF trades at $15.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas SEVCF's P/E ratio is 3.57. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SEVCF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is less volatile compared to SEVCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, NRDE has a market cap of 21.25M. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while NRDE trades at $1.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas NRDE's P/E ratio is -1.97. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NRDE's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to NRDE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, ELMSQ has a market cap of 12.40M. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while ELMSQ trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas ELMSQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ELMSQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to ELMSQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, ELMWQ has a market cap of 8.68M. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while ELMWQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas ELMWQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ELMWQ's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to ELMWQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, LFEV has a market cap of 4.20M. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while LFEV trades at $0.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas LFEV's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LFEV's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to LFEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, GKIT has a market cap of 3.81M. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while GKIT trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas GKIT's P/E ratio is -3.70. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GKIT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to GKIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, EVTGF has a market cap of 1.42M. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while EVTGF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas EVTGF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EVTGF's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to EVTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, FSRNQ has a market cap of 1.06M. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while FSRNQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas FSRNQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FSRNQ's ROE of -3.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is less volatile compared to FSRNQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, ELEK has a market cap of 930629.00. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while ELEK trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas ELEK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ELEK's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to ELEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, ELCR has a market cap of 681583.00. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while ELCR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas ELCR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ELCR's ROE of +3.58%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is less volatile compared to ELCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, TUGAF has a market cap of 386816.00. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while TUGAF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas TUGAF's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TUGAF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to TUGAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, RONN has a market cap of 228179.00. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while RONN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas RONN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RONN's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is less volatile compared to RONN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, GACR has a market cap of 104560.00. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while GACR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas GACR's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GACR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to GACR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, CSBI has a market cap of 32318.00. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while CSBI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas CSBI's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CSBI's ROE of +2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is less volatile compared to CSBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, ELIO has a market cap of 14196.00. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while ELIO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas ELIO's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ELIO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to ELIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, NVYAF has a market cap of 8693.00. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while NVYAF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas NVYAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NVYAF's ROE of -16.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to NVYAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, ARVLF has a market cap of 3675.00. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while ARVLF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas ARVLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ARVLF's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to ARVLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.

SZKMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZKMY stands at 24.18B. In comparison, NDVR has a market cap of 892.00. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMY is priced at $50.13, while NDVR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZKMY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.11, whereas NDVR's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, SZKMY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NDVR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMY is more volatile compared to NDVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMY.