Suzuki Motor Corporation
Suzuki Motor Corporation (SZKMF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SZKMF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SZKMF | $11.75 | -5.22% | 22.7B | 9.18 | $1.28 | +2.32% |
| GELYY | $50.79 | +1.60% | 515B | 12.18 | $4.17 | +1.65% |
| TOYOF | $20.97 | -4.68% | 289.7B | 12.42 | $1.79 | +2.90% |
| BYDDF | $13.35 | +0.24% | 126B | 66.84 | $0.20 | +1.38% |
| BYDDY | $13.26 | -0.08% | 119.7B | 66.45 | $0.20 | +1.38% |
| BYMOF | $102.02 | +0.00% | 62.6B | 7.82 | $13.05 | +5.38% |
| MBGAF | $61.98 | -0.29% | 59.2B | 8.27 | $7.48 | +7.84% |
| MBGYY | $15.42 | -0.13% | 59.1B | 8.25 | $1.87 | +7.69% |
| BAMXF | $91.17 | +0.00% | 56B | 6.99 | $13.05 | +5.27% |
| VLKPF | $107.68 | +4.61% | 54.8B | 7.01 | $15.37 | +7.31% |
Stock Comparison
SZKMF vs GELYY Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, GELYY has a market cap of 515B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while GELYY trades at $50.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas GELYY's P/E ratio is 12.18. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GELYY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to GELYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check GELYY's competition here
SZKMF vs TOYOF Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, TOYOF has a market cap of 289.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while TOYOF trades at $20.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas TOYOF's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TOYOF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to TOYOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check TOYOF's competition here
SZKMF vs BYDDF Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, BYDDF has a market cap of 126B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while BYDDF trades at $13.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas BYDDF's P/E ratio is 66.84. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BYDDF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to BYDDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check BYDDF's competition here
SZKMF vs BYDDY Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, BYDDY has a market cap of 119.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while BYDDY trades at $13.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas BYDDY's P/E ratio is 66.45. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BYDDY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to BYDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check BYDDY's competition here
SZKMF vs BYMOF Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, BYMOF has a market cap of 62.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while BYMOF trades at $102.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas BYMOF's P/E ratio is 7.82. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BYMOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is less volatile compared to BYMOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check BYMOF's competition here
SZKMF vs MBGAF Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, MBGAF has a market cap of 59.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while MBGAF trades at $61.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas MBGAF's P/E ratio is 8.27. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MBGAF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to MBGAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check MBGAF's competition here
SZKMF vs MBGYY Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, MBGYY has a market cap of 59.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while MBGYY trades at $15.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas MBGYY's P/E ratio is 8.25. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MBGYY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to MBGYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check MBGYY's competition here
SZKMF vs BAMXF Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, BAMXF has a market cap of 56B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while BAMXF trades at $91.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas BAMXF's P/E ratio is 6.99. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BAMXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to BAMXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check BAMXF's competition here
SZKMF vs VLKPF Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, VLKPF has a market cap of 54.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while VLKPF trades at $107.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas VLKPF's P/E ratio is 7.01. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VLKPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to VLKPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check VLKPF's competition here
SZKMF vs VWAGY Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, VWAGY has a market cap of 51.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while VWAGY trades at $10.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas VWAGY's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VWAGY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to VWAGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check VWAGY's competition here
SZKMF vs VLKAF Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, VLKAF has a market cap of 51.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while VLKAF trades at $102.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas VLKAF's P/E ratio is 6.69. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VLKAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to VLKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check VLKAF's competition here
SZKMF vs VWAPY Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, VWAPY has a market cap of 51B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while VWAPY trades at $10.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas VWAPY's P/E ratio is 6.60. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VWAPY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to VWAPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check VWAPY's competition here
SZKMF vs MAHMF Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, MAHMF has a market cap of 40.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while MAHMF trades at $33.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas MAHMF's P/E ratio is 24.17. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MAHMF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to MAHMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check MAHMF's competition here
SZKMF vs HYMTF Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, HYMTF has a market cap of 39.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while HYMTF trades at $51.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas HYMTF's P/E ratio is 2.99. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HYMTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to HYMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check HYMTF's competition here
SZKMF vs DRPRF Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, DRPRF has a market cap of 39.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while DRPRF trades at $42.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas DRPRF's P/E ratio is 35.75. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DRPRF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to DRPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check DRPRF's competition here
SZKMF vs DRPRY Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, DRPRY has a market cap of 39B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while DRPRY trades at $4.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas DRPRY's P/E ratio is 35.43. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DRPRY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to DRPRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check DRPRY's competition here
SZKMF vs TYIDF Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, TYIDF has a market cap of 38.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while TYIDF trades at $129.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas TYIDF's P/E ratio is 30.12. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TYIDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to TYIDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check TYIDF's competition here
SZKMF vs TYIDY Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, TYIDY has a market cap of 38.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while TYIDY trades at $129.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas TYIDY's P/E ratio is 30.07. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TYIDY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to TYIDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check TYIDY's competition here
SZKMF vs HNDAF Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, HNDAF has a market cap of 37.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while HNDAF trades at $8.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas HNDAF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HNDAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to HNDAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check HNDAF's competition here
SZKMF vs GELHY Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, GELHY has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while GELHY trades at $48.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas GELHY's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GELHY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to GELHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check GELHY's competition here
SZKMF vs GELYF Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, GELYF has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while GELYF trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas GELYF's P/E ratio is 11.38. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GELYF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to GELYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check GELYF's competition here
SZKMF vs SZKMY Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, SZKMY has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while SZKMY trades at $49.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas SZKMY's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SZKMY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to SZKMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check SZKMY's competition here
SZKMF vs HYMLF Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, HYMLF has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while HYMLF trades at $89.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas HYMLF's P/E ratio is 6.32. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HYMLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to HYMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check HYMLF's competition here
SZKMF vs GWLLF Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, GWLLF has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while GWLLF trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas GWLLF's P/E ratio is 8.84. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GWLLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to GWLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check GWLLF's competition here
SZKMF vs XPNGF Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, XPNGF has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while XPNGF trades at $10.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas XPNGF's P/E ratio is -31.58. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to XPNGF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to XPNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check XPNGF's competition here
SZKMF vs BMWYY Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, BMWYY has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while BMWYY trades at $29.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas BMWYY's P/E ratio is 4.74. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BMWYY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to BMWYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check BMWYY's competition here
SZKMF vs EXXRF Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, EXXRF has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while EXXRF trades at $79.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas EXXRF's P/E ratio is -22.96. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EXXRF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to EXXRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check EXXRF's competition here
SZKMF vs GWLLY Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, GWLLY has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while GWLLY trades at $16.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas GWLLY's P/E ratio is 8.81. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GWLLY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to GWLLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check GWLLY's competition here
SZKMF vs YAMHY Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, YAMHY has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while YAMHY trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas YAMHY's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to YAMHY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to YAMHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check YAMHY's competition here
SZKMF vs NIOIF Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, NIOIF has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while NIOIF trades at $5.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas NIOIF's P/E ratio is -3.56. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NIOIF's ROE of -9.85%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to NIOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check NIOIF's competition here
SZKMF vs FUJHY Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, FUJHY has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while FUJHY trades at $8.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas FUJHY's P/E ratio is 7.12. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FUJHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to FUJHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check FUJHY's competition here
SZKMF vs FUJHF Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, FUJHF has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while FUJHF trades at $16.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas FUJHF's P/E ratio is 7.28. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FUJHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to FUJHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check FUJHF's competition here
SZKMF vs POAHY Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, POAHY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while POAHY trades at $3.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas POAHY's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to POAHY's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to POAHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check POAHY's competition here
SZKMF vs POAHF Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, POAHF has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while POAHF trades at $36.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas POAHF's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to POAHF's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is less volatile compared to POAHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check POAHF's competition here
SZKMF vs JCYCF Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, JCYCF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while JCYCF trades at $27.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas JCYCF's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JCYCF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to JCYCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check JCYCF's competition here
SZKMF vs ISUZY Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, ISUZY has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while ISUZY trades at $15.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas ISUZY's P/E ratio is 13.22. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ISUZY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to ISUZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check ISUZY's competition here
SZKMF vs ISUZF Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, ISUZF has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while ISUZF trades at $15.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas ISUZF's P/E ratio is 12.73. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ISUZF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to ISUZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check ISUZF's competition here
SZKMF vs JCYGY Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, JCYGY has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while JCYGY trades at $51.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas JCYGY's P/E ratio is 12.29. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JCYGY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to JCYGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check JCYGY's competition here
SZKMF vs DNFGF Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, DNFGF has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while DNFGF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas DNFGF's P/E ratio is -120.00. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DNFGF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to DNFGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check DNFGF's competition here
SZKMF vs DNFGY Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, DNFGY has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while DNFGY trades at $58.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas DNFGY's P/E ratio is -116.00. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DNFGY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to DNFGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check DNFGY's competition here
SZKMF vs RNSDF Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, RNSDF has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while RNSDF trades at $32.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas RNSDF's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RNSDF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to RNSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check RNSDF's competition here
SZKMF vs GNZUF Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, GNZUF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while GNZUF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas GNZUF's P/E ratio is -8.57. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GNZUF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to GNZUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check GNZUF's competition here
SZKMF vs RNLSY Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, RNLSY has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while RNLSY trades at $6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas RNLSY's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RNLSY's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to RNLSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check RNLSY's competition here
SZKMF vs NSANF Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, NSANF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while NSANF trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas NSANF's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NSANF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to NSANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check NSANF's competition here
SZKMF vs NSANY Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, NSANY has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while NSANY trades at $4.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas NSANY's P/E ratio is -1.41. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NSANY's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to NSANY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check NSANY's competition here
SZKMF vs VLVCY Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, VLVCY has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while VLVCY trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas VLVCY's P/E ratio is 495.00. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VLVCY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to VLVCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check VLVCY's competition here
SZKMF vs VLVOF Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, VLVOF has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while VLVOF trades at $2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas VLVOF's P/E ratio is 241.00. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VLVOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to VLVOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check VLVOF's competition here
SZKMF vs YMHAY Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, YMHAY has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while YMHAY trades at $13.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas YMHAY's P/E ratio is 6.92. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to YMHAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to YMHAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check YMHAY's competition here
SZKMF vs YAMHF Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, YAMHF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while YAMHF trades at $6.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas YAMHF's P/E ratio is 6.90. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to YAMHF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to YAMHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check YAMHF's competition here
SZKMF vs IVCGF Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, IVCGF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while IVCGF trades at $22.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas IVCGF's P/E ratio is 22.01. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IVCGF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to IVCGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check IVCGF's competition here
SZKMF vs MZDAF Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, MZDAF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while MZDAF trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas MZDAF's P/E ratio is 22.73. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MZDAF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to MZDAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check MZDAF's competition here
SZKMF vs MZDAY Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, MZDAY has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while MZDAY trades at $3.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas MZDAY's P/E ratio is 21.06. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MZDAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to MZDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check MZDAY's competition here
SZKMF vs YADGF Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, YADGF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while YADGF trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas YADGF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to YADGF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is less volatile compared to YADGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check YADGF's competition here
SZKMF vs SMEBF Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, SMEBF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while SMEBF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas SMEBF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SMEBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is less volatile compared to SMEBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check SMEBF's competition here
SZKMF vs MMTOF Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, MMTOF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while MMTOF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas MMTOF's P/E ratio is 125.00. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MMTOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to MMTOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check MMTOF's competition here
SZKMF vs RONN Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, RONN has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while RONN trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas RONN's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RONN's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is less volatile compared to RONN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check RONN's competition here
SZKMF vs BCAUF Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, BCAUF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while BCAUF trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas BCAUF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BCAUF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to BCAUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check BCAUF's competition here
SZKMF vs BMCLF Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, BMCLF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while BMCLF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas BMCLF's P/E ratio is -22.90. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BMCLF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to BMCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check BMCLF's competition here
SZKMF vs NFYEF Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, NFYEF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while NFYEF trades at $13.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas NFYEF's P/E ratio is -5.62. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NFYEF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to NFYEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check NFYEF's competition here
SZKMF vs BCCMY Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, BCCMY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while BCCMY trades at $2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas BCCMY's P/E ratio is -15.46. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BCCMY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to BCCMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check BCCMY's competition here
SZKMF vs HINOY Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, HINOY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while HINOY trades at $23.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas HINOY's P/E ratio is 8.98. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HINOY's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is less volatile compared to HINOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check HINOY's competition here
SZKMF vs HINOF Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, HINOF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while HINOF trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas HINOF's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HINOF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to HINOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check HINOF's competition here
SZKMF vs NSNHF Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, NSNHF has a market cap of 922.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while NSNHF trades at $6.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas NSNHF's P/E ratio is 17.02. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NSNHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to NSNHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check NSNHF's competition here
SZKMF vs ELMWQ Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, ELMWQ has a market cap of 868.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while ELMWQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas ELMWQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ELMWQ's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to ELMWQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check ELMWQ's competition here
SZKMF vs FOVSY Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, FOVSY has a market cap of 785.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while FOVSY trades at $11.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas FOVSY's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FOVSY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to FOVSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check FOVSY's competition here
SZKMF vs PIAGF Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, PIAGF has a market cap of 634.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while PIAGF trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas PIAGF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PIAGF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to PIAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check PIAGF's competition here
SZKMF vs ARGGY Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, ARGGY has a market cap of 546.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while ARGGY trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas ARGGY's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ARGGY's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to ARGGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check ARGGY's competition here
SZKMF vs AMGDF Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, AMGDF has a market cap of 533.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while AMGDF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas AMGDF's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AMGDF's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is less volatile compared to AMGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check AMGDF's competition here
SZKMF vs KRSOF Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, KRSOF has a market cap of 444.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while KRSOF trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas KRSOF's P/E ratio is 49.40. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KRSOF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to KRSOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check KRSOF's competition here
SZKMF vs NRDE Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, NRDE has a market cap of 27.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while NRDE trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas NRDE's P/E ratio is -7.39. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NRDE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is less volatile compared to NRDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check NRDE's competition here
SZKMF vs RIDEQ Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, RIDEQ has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while RIDEQ trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas RIDEQ's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RIDEQ's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is less volatile compared to RIDEQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check RIDEQ's competition here
SZKMF vs FHYDF Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, FHYDF has a market cap of 22.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while FHYDF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas FHYDF's P/E ratio is -9.28. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FHYDF's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to FHYDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check FHYDF's competition here
SZKMF vs ELMSQ Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, ELMSQ has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while ELMSQ trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas ELMSQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ELMSQ's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is less volatile compared to ELMSQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check ELMSQ's competition here
SZKMF vs LFEV Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, LFEV has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while LFEV trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas LFEV's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LFEV's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to LFEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check LFEV's competition here
SZKMF vs SEVCF Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, SEVCF has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while SEVCF trades at $6.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas SEVCF's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SEVCF's ROE of -1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to SEVCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check SEVCF's competition here
SZKMF vs GKIT Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, GKIT has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while GKIT trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas GKIT's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GKIT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to GKIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check GKIT's competition here
SZKMF vs CSBI Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, CSBI has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while CSBI trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas CSBI's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CSBI's ROE of +2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is less volatile compared to CSBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check CSBI's competition here
SZKMF vs EVTGF Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, EVTGF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while EVTGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas EVTGF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EVTGF's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to EVTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check EVTGF's competition here
SZKMF vs FSRNQ Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, FSRNQ has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while FSRNQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas FSRNQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FSRNQ's ROE of -4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is less volatile compared to FSRNQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check FSRNQ's competition here
SZKMF vs ELEK Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, ELEK has a market cap of 844.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while ELEK trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas ELEK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ELEK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is less volatile compared to ELEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check ELEK's competition here
SZKMF vs ELCR Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, ELCR has a market cap of 681.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while ELCR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas ELCR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ELCR's ROE of +3.58%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is less volatile compared to ELCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check ELCR's competition here
SZKMF vs TUGAF Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, TUGAF has a market cap of 495.9K. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while TUGAF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas TUGAF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TUGAF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to TUGAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check TUGAF's competition here
SZKMF vs BINI Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, BINI has a market cap of 289.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while BINI trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas BINI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BINI's ROE of +5.98%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is less volatile compared to BINI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check BINI's competition here
SZKMF vs GACR Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, GACR has a market cap of 104.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while GACR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas GACR's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GACR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to GACR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check GACR's competition here
SZKMF vs EGOXF Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, EGOXF has a market cap of 9.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while EGOXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas EGOXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EGOXF's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to EGOXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check EGOXF's competition here
SZKMF vs ECDA Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, ECDA has a market cap of 3.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while ECDA trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas ECDA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ECDA's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is less volatile compared to ECDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check ECDA's competition here
SZKMF vs ELIO Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, ELIO has a market cap of 3K. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while ELIO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas ELIO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ELIO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is less volatile compared to ELIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check ELIO's competition here
SZKMF vs ARVLF Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, ARVLF has a market cap of 1.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while ARVLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas ARVLF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ARVLF's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to ARVLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check ARVLF's competition here
SZKMF vs NDVR Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, NDVR has a market cap of 892. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while NDVR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas NDVR's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NDVR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to NDVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check NDVR's competition here
SZKMF vs NVYAF Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, NVYAF has a market cap of 869. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while NVYAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas NVYAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NVYAF's ROE of -16.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is less volatile compared to NVYAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check NVYAF's competition here
SZKMF vs DDAIF Comparison March 2026
SZKMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SZKMF stands at 22.7B. In comparison, DDAIF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SZKMF is priced at $11.75, while DDAIF trades at $62.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SZKMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas DDAIF's P/E ratio is 6.03. In terms of profitability, SZKMF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DDAIF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SZKMF is more volatile compared to DDAIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZKMF.Check DDAIF's competition here