Swiss Water Decaffeinated Coffee Inc.
Swiss Water Decaffeinated Coffee Inc. SWSSF Peers
See (SWSSF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaged Foods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SWSSF | $2.05 | N/A | 19.6M | 10.25 | $0.20 | N/A |
| NSRGY | $108.23 | +0.06% | 278.4B | 21.31 | $5.08 | +3.14% |
| NSRGF | $107.30 | N/A | 275.9B | 21.12 | $5.08 | +3.44% |
| DANOY | $17.13 | -0.17% | 55.2B | 24.13 | $0.71 | +2.74% |
| GPDNF | $76.40 | -1.23% | 49.2B | 21.52 | $3.55 | +3.19% |
| TUFBY | $11.53 | +35.65% | 47.3B | 16.47 | $0.70 | +3.39% |
| AJINY | $23.64 | -0.55% | 23.5B | 98.50 | $0.24 | +1.13% |
| ELOAF | $0.01 | N/A | 22.6B | 0.80 | $0.01 | N/A |
| ASBFF | $29.04 | N/A | 20.9B | 12.20 | $2.38 | +2.90% |
| AJINF | $20.72 | N/A | 20.6B | 86.33 | $0.24 | +1.32% |
Stock Comparison
SWSSF vs NSRGY Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, NSRGY has a market cap of 278.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while NSRGY trades at $108.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas NSRGY's P/E ratio is 21.31. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NSRGY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to NSRGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs NSRGF Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, NSRGF has a market cap of 275.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while NSRGF trades at $107.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas NSRGF's P/E ratio is 21.12. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NSRGF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to NSRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs DANOY Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, DANOY has a market cap of 55.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while DANOY trades at $17.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas DANOY's P/E ratio is 24.13. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DANOY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to DANOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs GPDNF Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, GPDNF has a market cap of 49.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while GPDNF trades at $76.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas GPDNF's P/E ratio is 21.52. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GPDNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to GPDNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs TUFBY Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, TUFBY has a market cap of 47.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while TUFBY trades at $11.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas TUFBY's P/E ratio is 16.47. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TUFBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to TUFBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs AJINY Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, AJINY has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while AJINY trades at $23.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas AJINY's P/E ratio is 98.50. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AJINY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to AJINY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs ELOAF Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, ELOAF has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while ELOAF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas ELOAF's P/E ratio is 0.80. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ELOAF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to ELOAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs ASBFF Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, ASBFF has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while ASBFF trades at $29.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas ASBFF's P/E ratio is 12.20. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ASBFF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF and ASBFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWSSF vs AJINF Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, AJINF has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while AJINF trades at $20.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas AJINF's P/E ratio is 86.33. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AJINF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to AJINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs ASBFY Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, ASBFY has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while ASBFY trades at $28.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas ASBFY's P/E ratio is 11.87. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ASBFY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to ASBFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs KRYAY Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, KRYAY has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while KRYAY trades at $109.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas KRYAY's P/E ratio is 24.90. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KRYAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to KRYAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs KRYAF Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, KRYAF has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while KRYAF trades at $102.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas KRYAF's P/E ratio is 23.30. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KRYAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to KRYAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs JBSAY Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, JBSAY has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while JBSAY trades at $14.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas JBSAY's P/E ratio is 7.63. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to JBSAY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to JBSAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs BMBOY Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, BMBOY has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while BMBOY trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas BMBOY's P/E ratio is 21.49. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BMBOY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to BMBOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs GRBMF Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, GRBMF has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while GRBMF trades at $2.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas GRBMF's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GRBMF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF and GRBMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWSSF vs JDEPF Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, JDEPF has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while JDEPF trades at $24.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas JDEPF's P/E ratio is 19.39. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to JDEPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to JDEPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs WHGLY Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, WHGLY has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while WHGLY trades at $18.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas WHGLY's P/E ratio is 7.19. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WHGLY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to WHGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs ORKLY Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, ORKLY has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while ORKLY trades at $11.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas ORKLY's P/E ratio is 18.45. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ORKLY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to ORKLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs WHGRF Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, WHGRF has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while WHGRF trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas WHGRF's P/E ratio is 6.69. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WHGRF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to WHGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs ORKLF Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, ORKLF has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while ORKLF trades at $10.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas ORKLF's P/E ratio is 16.55. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ORKLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to ORKLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs CIADF Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, CIADF has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while CIADF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas CIADF's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CIADF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF and CIADF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWSSF vs TCYMF Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, TCYMF has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while TCYMF trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas TCYMF's P/E ratio is 17.89. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TCYMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to TCYMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs KIKOY Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, KIKOY has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while KIKOY trades at $20.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas KIKOY's P/E ratio is 22.77. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KIKOY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to KIKOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs TYCMY Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, TYCMY has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while TYCMY trades at $33.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas TYCMY's P/E ratio is 18.47. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TYCMY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to TYCMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs KIKOF Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, KIKOF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while KIKOF trades at $10.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas KIKOF's P/E ratio is 22.46. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KIKOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to KIKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs TTAZF Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, TTAZF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while TTAZF trades at $7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas TTAZF's P/E ratio is 77.60. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TTAZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF and TTAZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWSSF vs CIADY Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, CIADY has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while CIADY trades at $22.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas CIADY's P/E ratio is 557.75. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CIADY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to CIADY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs PIFFY Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, PIFFY has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while PIFFY trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas PIFFY's P/E ratio is 19.86. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PIFFY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to PIFFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs SAPIF Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, SAPIF has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while SAPIF trades at $19.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas SAPIF's P/E ratio is -71.04. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SAPIF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to SAPIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs WWNTF Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, WWNTF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while WWNTF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas WWNTF's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WWNTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to WWNTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs CFEIY Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, CFEIY has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while CFEIY trades at $8.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas CFEIY's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CFEIY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF and CFEIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWSSF vs GCHOY Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, GCHOY has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while GCHOY trades at $15.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas GCHOY's P/E ratio is 39.82. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GCHOY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to GCHOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs SDPNF Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, SDPNF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while SDPNF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas SDPNF's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SDPNF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to SDPNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs TSUKY Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, TSUKY has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while TSUKY trades at $69.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas TSUKY's P/E ratio is 15.85. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TSUKY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to TSUKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs GPAGF Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, GPAGF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while GPAGF trades at $18.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas GPAGF's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GPAGF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF and GPAGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWSSF vs ARHUF Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, ARHUF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while ARHUF trades at $25.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas ARHUF's P/E ratio is 18.17. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ARHUF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to ARHUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs DLLFF Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, DLLFF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while DLLFF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas DLLFF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DLLFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF and DLLFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWSSF vs NFPDF Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, NFPDF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while NFPDF trades at $22.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas NFPDF's P/E ratio is 17.34. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NFPDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to NFPDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs CHFLF Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, CHFLF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while CHFLF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas CHFLF's P/E ratio is 14.20. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CHFLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to CHFLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs MEJHY Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, MEJHY has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while MEJHY trades at $11.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas MEJHY's P/E ratio is 18.23. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MEJHY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to MEJHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs TSUKF Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, TSUKF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while TSUKF trades at $62.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas TSUKF's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TSUKF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to TSUKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs MEJHF Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, MEJHF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while MEJHF trades at $20.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas MEJHF's P/E ratio is 17.02. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MEJHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to MEJHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs EMLZF Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, EMLZF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while EMLZF trades at $990.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas EMLZF's P/E ratio is 19.87. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EMLZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to EMLZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs SMPFF Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, SMPFF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while SMPFF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas SMPFF's P/E ratio is 13.38. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SMPFF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF and SMPFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWSSF vs ARZTY Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, ARZTY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while ARZTY trades at $8.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas ARZTY's P/E ratio is 18.67. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ARZTY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to ARZTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs IOIOF Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, IOIOF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while IOIOF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas IOIOF's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IOIOF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF and IOIOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWSSF vs PIFMY Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, PIFMY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while PIFMY trades at $23.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas PIFMY's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PIFMY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to PIFMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs PIFMF Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, PIFMF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while PIFMF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas PIFMF's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PIFMF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to PIFMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs NSLYF Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, NSLYF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while NSLYF trades at $17.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas NSLYF's P/E ratio is 44.95. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NSLYF's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF and NSLYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWSSF vs MRRTY Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, MRRTY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while MRRTY trades at $4.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas MRRTY's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MRRTY's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to MRRTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs UVRBY Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, UVRBY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while UVRBY trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas UVRBY's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to UVRBY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF and UVRBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWSSF vs NIPMY Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, NIPMY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while NIPMY trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas NIPMY's P/E ratio is 18.68. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NIPMY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to NIPMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs ACOPF Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, ACOPF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while ACOPF trades at $4.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas ACOPF's P/E ratio is 34.36. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ACOPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to ACOPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs UVRBF Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, UVRBF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while UVRBF trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas UVRBF's P/E ratio is 16.10. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to UVRBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF and UVRBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWSSF vs CRWKF Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, CRWKF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while CRWKF trades at $63.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas CRWKF's P/E ratio is 23.79. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CRWKF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to CRWKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs TATYY Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, TATYY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while TATYY trades at $30.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas TATYY's P/E ratio is 49.03. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TATYY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to TATYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs NSFMF Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, NSFMF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while NSFMF trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas NSFMF's P/E ratio is 14.02. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NSFMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF and NSFMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWSSF vs TATYF Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, TATYF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while TATYF trades at $7.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas TATYF's P/E ratio is 46.75. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TATYF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to TATYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs GLAPY Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, GLAPY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while GLAPY trades at $63.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas GLAPY's P/E ratio is 20.30. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GLAPY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to GLAPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs FPAFF Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, FPAFF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while FPAFF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas FPAFF's P/E ratio is 5.14. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FPAFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to FPAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs GLAPF Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, GLAPF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while GLAPF trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas GLAPF's P/E ratio is 19.42. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GLAPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to GLAPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs NCHEY Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, NCHEY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while NCHEY trades at $12.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas NCHEY's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NCHEY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to NCHEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs YMZBY Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, YMZBY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while YMZBY trades at $152.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas YMZBY's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to YMZBY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to YMZBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs FPAFY Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, FPAFY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while FPAFY trades at $3.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas FPAFY's P/E ratio is 4.96. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FPAFY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to FPAFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs CBCFF Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, CBCFF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while CBCFF trades at $22.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas CBCFF's P/E ratio is 21.16. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CBCFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF and CBCFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWSSF vs EBRPY Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, EBRPY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while EBRPY trades at $17.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas EBRPY's P/E ratio is 20.34. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EBRPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF and EBRPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWSSF vs EBRPF Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, EBRPF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while EBRPF trades at $17.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas EBRPF's P/E ratio is 15.72. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EBRPF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF and EBRPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWSSF vs SUEZF Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, SUEZF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while SUEZF trades at $13.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas SUEZF's P/E ratio is -21.38. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SUEZF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to SUEZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs SUEZY Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, SUEZY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while SUEZY trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas SUEZY's P/E ratio is -20.48. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SUEZY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF and SUEZY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWSSF vs PRBZF Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, PRBZF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while PRBZF trades at $57.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas PRBZF's P/E ratio is 30.38. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PRBZF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF and PRBZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWSSF vs CLBEY Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, CLBEY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while CLBEY trades at $5.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas CLBEY's P/E ratio is 17.83. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CLBEY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to CLBEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs LYSFF Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, LYSFF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while LYSFF trades at $4.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas LYSFF's P/E ratio is 14.30. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LYSFF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to LYSFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs LYSFY Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, LYSFY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while LYSFY trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas LYSFY's P/E ratio is 14.17. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LYSFY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to LYSFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs ARZTF Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, ARZTF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while ARZTF trades at $82.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas ARZTF's P/E ratio is 690.00. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ARZTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to ARZTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs PRRFY Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, PRRFY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while PRRFY trades at $14.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas PRRFY's P/E ratio is 15.02. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PRRFY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to PRRFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs NHFOF Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, NHFOF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while NHFOF trades at $24.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas NHFOF's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NHFOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF and NHFOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWSSF vs MLFNF Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, MLFNF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while MLFNF trades at $19.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas MLFNF's P/E ratio is 35.24. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MLFNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to MLFNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs FTROF Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, FTROF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while FTROF trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas FTROF's P/E ratio is 9.56. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FTROF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to FTROF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs TBLMF Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, TBLMF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while TBLMF trades at $14.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas TBLMF's P/E ratio is 15.77. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TBLMF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to TBLMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs SGLJF Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, SGLJF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while SGLJF trades at $15.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas SGLJF's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SGLJF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to SGLJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs PFODF Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, PFODF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while PFODF trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas PFODF's P/E ratio is 12.89. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PFODF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to PFODF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs GRPBF Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, GRPBF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while GRPBF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas GRPBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GRPBF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF and GRPBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWSSF vs HOFJF Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, HOFJF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while HOFJF trades at $19.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas HOFJF's P/E ratio is 24.05. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HOFJF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF and HOFJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWSSF vs AVSFY Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, AVSFY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while AVSFY trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas AVSFY's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AVSFY's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF and AVSFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWSSF vs TBLMY Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, TBLMY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while TBLMY trades at $10.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas TBLMY's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TBLMY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF and TBLMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWSSF vs FSRCY Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, FSRCY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while FSRCY trades at $109.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas FSRCY's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FSRCY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to FSRCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs YNNHF Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, YNNHF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while YNNHF trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas YNNHF's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to YNNHF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to YNNHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs TUFUF Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, TUFUF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while TUFUF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas TUFUF's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TUFUF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to TUFUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs FNEVF Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, FNEVF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while FNEVF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas FNEVF's P/E ratio is 12.16. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FNEVF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF and FNEVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWSSF vs HLFGY Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, HLFGY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while HLFGY trades at $15.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas HLFGY's P/E ratio is 24.16. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HLFGY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to HLFGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs VTSYF Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, VTSYF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while VTSYF trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas VTSYF's P/E ratio is 128.00. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VTSYF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to VTSYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs NISUY Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, NISUY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while NISUY trades at $42.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas NISUY's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NISUY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to NISUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs FNEVY Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, FNEVY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while FNEVY trades at $4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas FNEVY's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FNEVY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to FNEVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs AKEJF Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, AKEJF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while AKEJF trades at $35.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas AKEJF's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AKEJF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to AKEJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs JWLLF Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, JWLLF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while JWLLF trades at $25.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas JWLLF's P/E ratio is 29.22. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to JWLLF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to JWLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs GBFBF Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, GBFBF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while GBFBF trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas GBFBF's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GBFBF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF and GBFBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWSSF vs GNCGY Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, GNCGY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while GNCGY trades at $9.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas GNCGY's P/E ratio is 0.18. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GNCGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to GNCGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.
SWSSF vs HLTFF Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, HLTFF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while HLTFF trades at $11.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas HLTFF's P/E ratio is 22.45. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HLTFF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF and HLTFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWSSF vs BKKVF Comparison
SWSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSSF stands at 19.6M. In comparison, BKKVF has a market cap of 995.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SWSSF is priced at $2.05, while BKKVF trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas BKKVF's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, SWSSF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BKKVF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSSF is less volatile compared to BKKVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSSF.