Swiss Life Holding AG
Swiss Life Holding AG SWSDF Peers
See (SWSDF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SWSDF | $983.23 | +0.97% | 28.05B | 19.13 | $51.40 | +3.83% |
| ALIZY | $39.10 | -7.54% | 1.51T | 13.72 | $2.85 | +3.07% |
| ALIZF | $391.00 | -4.87% | 150.89B | 13.73 | $28.48 | +4.44% |
| ZFSVF | $700.00 | -0.49% | 99.60B | 17.43 | $40.16 | +4.90% |
| AXAHY | $45.26 | -3.85% | 98.90B | 12.33 | $3.67 | +4.38% |
| AXAHF | $45.07 | -3.54% | 98.06B | 12.28 | $3.67 | +4.86% |
| ZURVY | $34.24 | -2.33% | 97.44B | 17.04 | $2.01 | +2.96% |
| ARZGY | $19.21 | -1.59% | 58.62B | 13.72 | $1.40 | +3.86% |
| ARZGF | $35.00 | N/A | 52.57B | 12.54 | $2.79 | +4.41% |
| SUNFF | $11.59 | +0.08% | 33.62B | 2.29 | $5.06 | +3.66% |
Stock Comparison
SWSDF vs ALIZY Comparison
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 28.05B. In comparison, ALIZY has a market cap of 1.51T. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $983.23, while ALIZY trades at $39.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.13, whereas ALIZY's P/E ratio is 13.72. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ALIZY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to ALIZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.
SWSDF vs ALIZF Comparison
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 28.05B. In comparison, ALIZF has a market cap of 150.89B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $983.23, while ALIZF trades at $391.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.13, whereas ALIZF's P/E ratio is 13.73. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ALIZF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and ALIZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWSDF vs ZFSVF Comparison
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 28.05B. In comparison, ZFSVF has a market cap of 99.60B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $983.23, while ZFSVF trades at $700.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.13, whereas ZFSVF's P/E ratio is 17.43. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ZFSVF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to ZFSVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.
SWSDF vs AXAHY Comparison
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 28.05B. In comparison, AXAHY has a market cap of 98.90B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $983.23, while AXAHY trades at $45.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.13, whereas AXAHY's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AXAHY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to AXAHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.
SWSDF vs AXAHF Comparison
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 28.05B. In comparison, AXAHF has a market cap of 98.06B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $983.23, while AXAHF trades at $45.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.13, whereas AXAHF's P/E ratio is 12.28. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AXAHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to AXAHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.
SWSDF vs ZURVY Comparison
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 28.05B. In comparison, ZURVY has a market cap of 97.44B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $983.23, while ZURVY trades at $34.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.13, whereas ZURVY's P/E ratio is 17.04. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ZURVY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to ZURVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.
SWSDF vs ARZGY Comparison
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 28.05B. In comparison, ARZGY has a market cap of 58.62B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $983.23, while ARZGY trades at $19.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.13, whereas ARZGY's P/E ratio is 13.72. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ARZGY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to ARZGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.
SWSDF vs ARZGF Comparison
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 28.05B. In comparison, ARZGF has a market cap of 52.57B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $983.23, while ARZGF trades at $35.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.13, whereas ARZGF's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ARZGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to ARZGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.
SWSDF vs SUNFF Comparison
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 28.05B. In comparison, SUNFF has a market cap of 33.62B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $983.23, while SUNFF trades at $11.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.13, whereas SUNFF's P/E ratio is 2.29. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SUNFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to SUNFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.
SWSDF vs SZLMY Comparison
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 28.05B. In comparison, SZLMY has a market cap of 27.67B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $983.23, while SZLMY trades at $48.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.13, whereas SZLMY's P/E ratio is 18.87. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SZLMY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to SZLMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.
SWSDF vs SAXPY Comparison
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 28.05B. In comparison, SAXPY has a market cap of 27.48B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $983.23, while SAXPY trades at $20.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.13, whereas SAXPY's P/E ratio is 21.51. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SAXPY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to SAXPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.
SWSDF vs SAXPF Comparison
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 28.05B. In comparison, SAXPF has a market cap of 26.90B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $983.23, while SAXPF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.13, whereas SAXPF's P/E ratio is 20.83. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SAXPF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to SAXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.
SWSDF vs TNXXF Comparison
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 28.05B. In comparison, TNXXF has a market cap of 21.89B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $983.23, while TNXXF trades at $84.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.13, whereas TNXXF's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TNXXF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to TNXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.
SWSDF vs TLLXY Comparison
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 28.05B. In comparison, TLLXY has a market cap of 20.69B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $983.23, while TLLXY trades at $40.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.13, whereas TLLXY's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TLLXY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to TLLXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.
SWSDF vs AVVIY Comparison
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 28.05B. In comparison, AVVIY has a market cap of 20.40B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $983.23, while AVVIY trades at $15.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.13, whereas AVVIY's P/E ratio is 24.74. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AVVIY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to AVVIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.
SWSDF vs AIVAF Comparison
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 28.05B. In comparison, AIVAF has a market cap of 20.01B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $983.23, while AIVAF trades at $7.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.13, whereas AIVAF's P/E ratio is 24.27. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AIVAF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and AIVAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWSDF vs NNGPF Comparison
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 28.05B. In comparison, NNGPF has a market cap of 16.76B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $983.23, while NNGPF trades at $62.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.13, whereas NNGPF's P/E ratio is 9.93. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NNGPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to NNGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.
SWSDF vs NNGRY Comparison
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 28.05B. In comparison, NNGRY has a market cap of 16.35B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $983.23, while NNGRY trades at $30.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.13, whereas NNGRY's P/E ratio is 9.67. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NNGRY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to NNGRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.
SWSDF vs TGVSF Comparison
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 28.05B. In comparison, TGVSF has a market cap of 13.50B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $983.23, while TGVSF trades at $22.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.13, whereas TGVSF's P/E ratio is 20.75. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TGVSF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to TGVSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.
SWSDF vs UFGSY Comparison
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 28.05B. In comparison, UFGSY has a market cap of 13.45B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $983.23, while UFGSY trades at $9.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.13, whereas UFGSY's P/E ratio is 11.05. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to UFGSY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to UFGSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.
SWSDF vs BBSEY Comparison
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 28.05B. In comparison, BBSEY has a market cap of 12.99B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $983.23, while BBSEY trades at $6.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.13, whereas BBSEY's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BBSEY's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to BBSEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.
SWSDF vs AGESF Comparison
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 28.05B. In comparison, AGESF has a market cap of 12.21B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $983.23, while AGESF trades at $63.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.13, whereas AGESF's P/E ratio is 9.18. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AGESF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to AGESF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.
SWSDF vs AGESY Comparison
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 28.05B. In comparison, AGESY has a market cap of 12.18B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $983.23, while AGESY trades at $63.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.13, whereas AGESY's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AGESY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to AGESY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.
SWSDF vs GJNSY Comparison
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 28.05B. In comparison, GJNSY has a market cap of 11.81B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $983.23, while GJNSY trades at $23.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.13, whereas GJNSY's P/E ratio is 22.29. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GJNSY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and GJNSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWSDF vs MPFRF Comparison
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 28.05B. In comparison, MPFRF has a market cap of 11.53B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $983.23, while MPFRF trades at $3.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.13, whereas MPFRF's P/E ratio is 10.44. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MPFRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and MPFRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWSDF vs AEGOF Comparison
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 28.05B. In comparison, AEGOF has a market cap of 10.63B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $983.23, while AEGOF trades at $6.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.13, whereas AEGOF's P/E ratio is 15.98. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AEGOF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to AEGOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.
SWSDF vs BLHEY Comparison
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 28.05B. In comparison, BLHEY has a market cap of 10.51B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $983.23, while BLHEY trades at $23.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.13, whereas BLHEY's P/E ratio is 22.44. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BLHEY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to BLHEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.
SWSDF vs BLHEF Comparison
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 28.05B. In comparison, BLHEF has a market cap of 10.37B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $983.23, while BLHEF trades at $227.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.13, whereas BLHEF's P/E ratio is 22.13. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BLHEF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to BLHEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.
SWSDF vs IAFNF Comparison
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 28.05B. In comparison, IAFNF has a market cap of 9.09B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $983.23, while IAFNF trades at $97.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.13, whereas IAFNF's P/E ratio is 13.82. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IAFNF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and IAFNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWSDF vs GJNSF Comparison
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 28.05B. In comparison, GJNSF has a market cap of 8.76B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $983.23, while GJNSF trades at $17.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.13, whereas GJNSF's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GJNSF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to GJNSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.
SWSDF vs HLVTY Comparison
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 28.05B. In comparison, HLVTY has a market cap of 8.59B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $983.23, while HLVTY trades at $4.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.13, whereas HLVTY's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HLVTY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to HLVTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.
SWSDF vs UNPLF Comparison
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 28.05B. In comparison, UNPLF has a market cap of 8.34B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $983.23, while UNPLF trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.13, whereas UNPLF's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to UNPLF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and UNPLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWSDF vs SLFIF Comparison
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 28.05B. In comparison, SLFIF has a market cap of 7.99B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $983.23, while SLFIF trades at $13.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.13, whereas SLFIF's P/E ratio is 2.75. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SLFIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and SLFIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWSDF vs HELNF Comparison
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 28.05B. In comparison, HELNF has a market cap of 7.30B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $983.23, while HELNF trades at $137.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.13, whereas HELNF's P/E ratio is 9.97. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HELNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and HELNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWSDF vs RMRHF Comparison
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 28.05B. In comparison, RMRHF has a market cap of 6.47B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $983.23, while RMRHF trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.13, whereas RMRHF's P/E ratio is 23.38. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RMRHF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and RMRHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWSDF vs FDIAY Comparison
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 28.05B. In comparison, FDIAY has a market cap of 6.38B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $983.23, while FDIAY trades at $9.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.13, whereas FDIAY's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FDIAY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and FDIAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWSDF vs MPFRY Comparison
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 28.05B. In comparison, MPFRY has a market cap of 6.11B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $983.23, while MPFRY trades at $7.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.13, whereas MPFRY's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MPFRY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to MPFRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.
SWSDF vs TPDKY Comparison
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 28.05B. In comparison, TPDKY has a market cap of 4.96B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $983.23, while TPDKY trades at $5.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.13, whereas TPDKY's P/E ratio is 29.75. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TPDKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and TPDKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWSDF vs DIISF Comparison
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 28.05B. In comparison, DIISF has a market cap of 4.82B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $983.23, while DIISF trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.13, whereas DIISF's P/E ratio is 24.73. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DIISF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to DIISF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.
SWSDF vs TPDNF Comparison
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 28.05B. In comparison, TPDNF has a market cap of 4.72B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $983.23, while TPDNF trades at $51.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.13, whereas TPDNF's P/E ratio is 28.46. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TPDNF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to TPDNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.
SWSDF vs GIVPY Comparison
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 28.05B. In comparison, GIVPY has a market cap of 4.00B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $983.23, while GIVPY trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.13, whereas GIVPY's P/E ratio is 2.11. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GIVPY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and GIVPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWSDF vs GIVSY Comparison
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 28.05B. In comparison, GIVSY has a market cap of 3.81B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $983.23, while GIVSY trades at $20.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.13, whereas GIVSY's P/E ratio is 3.27. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GIVSY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to GIVSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.
SWSDF vs VNRGF Comparison
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 28.05B. In comparison, VNRGF has a market cap of 3.38B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $983.23, while VNRGF trades at $26.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.13, whereas VNRGF's P/E ratio is 3.70. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VNRGF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and VNRGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWSDF vs AFFT Comparison
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 28.05B. In comparison, AFFT has a market cap of 3.30B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $983.23, while AFFT trades at $16.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.13, whereas AFFT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AFFT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and AFFT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWSDF vs AFFS Comparison
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 28.05B. In comparison, AFFS has a market cap of 3.06B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $983.23, while AFFS trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.13, whereas AFFS's P/E ratio is 15.86. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AFFS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and AFFS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWSDF vs GCNJF Comparison
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 28.05B. In comparison, GCNJF has a market cap of 2.98B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $983.23, while GCNJF trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.13, whereas GCNJF's P/E ratio is 6.36. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GCNJF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and GCNJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWSDF vs ABDBY Comparison
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 28.05B. In comparison, ABDBY has a market cap of 2.92B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $983.23, while ABDBY trades at $4.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.13, whereas ABDBY's P/E ratio is -67.33. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ABDBY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and ABDBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWSDF vs MNRHF Comparison
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 28.05B. In comparison, MNRHF has a market cap of 1.56B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $983.23, while MNRHF trades at $25.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.13, whereas MNRHF's P/E ratio is 7.30. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MNRHF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and MNRHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWSDF vs VNRFY Comparison
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 28.05B. In comparison, VNRFY has a market cap of 743.68M. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $983.23, while VNRFY trades at $5.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.13, whereas VNRFY's P/E ratio is 6.38. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VNRFY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to VNRFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.
SWSDF vs AIFIF Comparison
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 28.05B. In comparison, AIFIF has a market cap of 462.78M. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $983.23, while AIFIF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.13, whereas AIFIF's P/E ratio is 4.83. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AIFIF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and AIFIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWSDF vs SGPLF Comparison
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 28.05B. In comparison, SGPLF has a market cap of 280.19M. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $983.23, while SGPLF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.13, whereas SGPLF's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SGPLF's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and SGPLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWSDF vs ERPRF Comparison
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 28.05B. In comparison, ERPRF has a market cap of 163.76M. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $983.23, while ERPRF trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.13, whereas ERPRF's P/E ratio is 7.54. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ERPRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and ERPRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWSDF vs TSCHY Comparison
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 28.05B. In comparison, TSCHY has a market cap of 21.20M. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $983.23, while TSCHY trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.13, whereas TSCHY's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TSCHY's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and TSCHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWSDF vs NDEV Comparison
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 28.05B. In comparison, NDEV has a market cap of 4.87M. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $983.23, while NDEV trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.13, whereas NDEV's P/E ratio is 49.80. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NDEV's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and NDEV have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWSDF vs CNCPF Comparison
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 28.05B. In comparison, CNCPF has a market cap of 1.60M. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $983.23, while CNCPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.13, whereas CNCPF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CNCPF's ROE of +2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and CNCPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).