Swiss Life Holding AG
Swiss Life Holding AG (SWSDF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SWSDF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SWSDF | $1,081.65 | -5.53% | 30.9B | 20.08 | $53.87 | +4.04% |
| ALIZF | $437.83 | -4.07% | 178.1B | 14.47 | $32.18 | +3.84% |
| ALIZY | $43.97 | -1.81% | 169.7B | 13.90 | $3.21 | +3.82% |
| SAXPY | $21.48 | -1.51% | 116.9B | 12.40 | $1.76 | +3.53% |
| ZFSVF | $725.00 | +0.00% | 111.1B | 19.20 | $40.67 | +4.35% |
| ZURVY | $36.06 | -2.04% | 107.6B | 18.29 | $2.03 | +4.58% |
| AXAHF | $46.64 | -0.98% | 99.2B | 12.25 | $3.87 | +5.13% |
| AXAHY | $46.11 | -2.10% | 98.1B | 12.03 | $3.90 | +5.19% |
| ARZGY | $20.90 | -0.62% | 64.3B | 14.11 | $1.50 | +3.82% |
| ARZGF | $39.97 | +0.00% | 60.7B | 13.41 | $2.98 | +4.00% |
Stock Comparison
SWSDF vs ALIZF Comparison February 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 30.9B. In comparison, ALIZF has a market cap of 178.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,081.65, while ALIZF trades at $437.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.08, whereas ALIZF's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALIZF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to ALIZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.Check ALIZF's competition here
SWSDF vs ALIZY Comparison February 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 30.9B. In comparison, ALIZY has a market cap of 169.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,081.65, while ALIZY trades at $43.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.08, whereas ALIZY's P/E ratio is 13.90. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALIZY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to ALIZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.Check ALIZY's competition here
SWSDF vs SAXPY Comparison February 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 30.9B. In comparison, SAXPY has a market cap of 116.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,081.65, while SAXPY trades at $21.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.08, whereas SAXPY's P/E ratio is 12.40. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SAXPY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to SAXPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.Check SAXPY's competition here
SWSDF vs ZFSVF Comparison February 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 30.9B. In comparison, ZFSVF has a market cap of 111.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,081.65, while ZFSVF trades at $725.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.08, whereas ZFSVF's P/E ratio is 19.20. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ZFSVF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and ZFSVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZFSVF's competition here
SWSDF vs ZURVY Comparison February 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 30.9B. In comparison, ZURVY has a market cap of 107.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,081.65, while ZURVY trades at $36.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.08, whereas ZURVY's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ZURVY's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to ZURVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.Check ZURVY's competition here
SWSDF vs AXAHF Comparison February 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 30.9B. In comparison, AXAHF has a market cap of 99.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,081.65, while AXAHF trades at $46.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.08, whereas AXAHF's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AXAHF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to AXAHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.Check AXAHF's competition here
SWSDF vs AXAHY Comparison February 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 30.9B. In comparison, AXAHY has a market cap of 98.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,081.65, while AXAHY trades at $46.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.08, whereas AXAHY's P/E ratio is 12.03. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AXAHY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to AXAHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.Check AXAHY's competition here
SWSDF vs ARZGY Comparison February 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 30.9B. In comparison, ARZGY has a market cap of 64.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,081.65, while ARZGY trades at $20.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.08, whereas ARZGY's P/E ratio is 14.11. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ARZGY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to ARZGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.Check ARZGY's competition here
SWSDF vs ARZGF Comparison February 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 30.9B. In comparison, ARZGF has a market cap of 60.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,081.65, while ARZGF trades at $39.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.08, whereas ARZGF's P/E ratio is 13.41. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ARZGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and ARZGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ARZGF's competition here
SWSDF vs TNXXF Comparison February 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 30.9B. In comparison, TNXXF has a market cap of 33.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,081.65, while TNXXF trades at $131.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.08, whereas TNXXF's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TNXXF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and TNXXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TNXXF's competition here
SWSDF vs TLLXY Comparison February 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 30.9B. In comparison, TLLXY has a market cap of 33B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,081.65, while TLLXY trades at $64.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.08, whereas TLLXY's P/E ratio is 11.84. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TLLXY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and TLLXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TLLXY's competition here
SWSDF vs SZLMY Comparison February 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 30.9B. In comparison, SZLMY has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,081.65, while SZLMY trades at $55.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.08, whereas SZLMY's P/E ratio is 21.12. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SZLMY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to SZLMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.Check SZLMY's competition here
SWSDF vs SAXPF Comparison February 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 30.9B. In comparison, SAXPF has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,081.65, while SAXPF trades at $10.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.08, whereas SAXPF's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SAXPF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and SAXPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SAXPF's competition here
SWSDF vs AIVAF Comparison February 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 30.9B. In comparison, AIVAF has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,081.65, while AIVAF trades at $8.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.08, whereas AIVAF's P/E ratio is 30.27. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AIVAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to AIVAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.Check AIVAF's competition here
SWSDF vs AVVIY Comparison February 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 30.9B. In comparison, AVVIY has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,081.65, while AVVIY trades at $17.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.08, whereas AVVIY's P/E ratio is 29.03. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AVVIY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to AVVIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.Check AVVIY's competition here
SWSDF vs NNGRY Comparison February 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 30.9B. In comparison, NNGRY has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,081.65, while NNGRY trades at $40.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.08, whereas NNGRY's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NNGRY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to NNGRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.Check NNGRY's competition here
SWSDF vs NNGPF Comparison February 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 30.9B. In comparison, NNGPF has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,081.65, while NNGPF trades at $82.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.08, whereas NNGPF's P/E ratio is 14.90. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NNGPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and NNGPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NNGPF's competition here
SWSDF vs UFGSY Comparison February 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 30.9B. In comparison, UFGSY has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,081.65, while UFGSY trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.08, whereas UFGSY's P/E ratio is 11.88. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UFGSY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to UFGSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.Check UFGSY's competition here
SWSDF vs TGVSF Comparison February 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 30.9B. In comparison, TGVSF has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,081.65, while TGVSF trades at $25.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.08, whereas TGVSF's P/E ratio is 17.94. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TGVSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and TGVSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TGVSF's competition here
SWSDF vs GJNSY Comparison February 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 30.9B. In comparison, GJNSY has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,081.65, while GJNSY trades at $28.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.08, whereas GJNSY's P/E ratio is 21.94. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GJNSY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to GJNSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.Check GJNSY's competition here
SWSDF vs AGESY Comparison February 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 30.9B. In comparison, AGESY has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,081.65, while AGESY trades at $73.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.08, whereas AGESY's P/E ratio is 10.06. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AGESY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to AGESY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.Check AGESY's competition here
SWSDF vs HLVTY Comparison February 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 30.9B. In comparison, HLVTY has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,081.65, while HLVTY trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.08, whereas HLVTY's P/E ratio is 19.24. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HLVTY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and HLVTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HLVTY's competition here
SWSDF vs AGESF Comparison February 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 30.9B. In comparison, AGESF has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,081.65, while AGESF trades at $69.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.08, whereas AGESF's P/E ratio is 9.40. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AGESF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to AGESF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.Check AGESF's competition here
SWSDF vs HELNF Comparison February 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 30.9B. In comparison, HELNF has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,081.65, while HELNF trades at $247.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.08, whereas HELNF's P/E ratio is 18.66. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HELNF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and HELNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HELNF's competition here
SWSDF vs BBSEY Comparison February 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 30.9B. In comparison, BBSEY has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,081.65, while BBSEY trades at $7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.08, whereas BBSEY's P/E ratio is 7.52. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BBSEY's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to BBSEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.Check BBSEY's competition here
SWSDF vs MPFRF Comparison February 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 30.9B. In comparison, MPFRF has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,081.65, while MPFRF trades at $4.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.08, whereas MPFRF's P/E ratio is 10.30. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MPFRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to MPFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.Check MPFRF's competition here
SWSDF vs AEGOF Comparison February 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 30.9B. In comparison, AEGOF has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,081.65, while AEGOF trades at $8.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.08, whereas AEGOF's P/E ratio is 8.01. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AEGOF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and AEGOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AEGOF's competition here
SWSDF vs BLHEF Comparison February 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 30.9B. In comparison, BLHEF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,081.65, while BLHEF trades at $236.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.08, whereas BLHEF's P/E ratio is 19.29. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BLHEF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to BLHEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.Check BLHEF's competition here
SWSDF vs IAFNF Comparison February 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 30.9B. In comparison, IAFNF has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,081.65, while IAFNF trades at $109.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.08, whereas IAFNF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IAFNF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to IAFNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.Check IAFNF's competition here
SWSDF vs SLFIF Comparison February 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 30.9B. In comparison, SLFIF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,081.65, while SLFIF trades at $15.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.08, whereas SLFIF's P/E ratio is 3.14. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SLFIF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and SLFIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SLFIF's competition here
SWSDF vs GJNSF Comparison February 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 30.9B. In comparison, GJNSF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,081.65, while GJNSF trades at $17.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.08, whereas GJNSF's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GJNSF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and GJNSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GJNSF's competition here
SWSDF vs UNPLF Comparison February 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 30.9B. In comparison, UNPLF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,081.65, while UNPLF trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.08, whereas UNPLF's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UNPLF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and UNPLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UNPLF's competition here
SWSDF vs MPFRY Comparison February 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 30.9B. In comparison, MPFRY has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,081.65, while MPFRY trades at $9.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.08, whereas MPFRY's P/E ratio is 12.16. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MPFRY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and MPFRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MPFRY's competition here
SWSDF vs VNRGF Comparison February 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 30.9B. In comparison, VNRGF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,081.65, while VNRGF trades at $56.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.08, whereas VNRGF's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VNRGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and VNRGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VNRGF's competition here
SWSDF vs SUNFF Comparison February 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 30.9B. In comparison, SUNFF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,081.65, while SUNFF trades at $11.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.08, whereas SUNFF's P/E ratio is 2.33. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SUNFF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and SUNFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SUNFF's competition here
SWSDF vs RMRHF Comparison February 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 30.9B. In comparison, RMRHF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,081.65, while RMRHF trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.08, whereas RMRHF's P/E ratio is 23.38. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RMRHF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and RMRHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RMRHF's competition here
SWSDF vs FDIAY Comparison February 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 30.9B. In comparison, FDIAY has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,081.65, while FDIAY trades at $9.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.08, whereas FDIAY's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FDIAY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and FDIAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FDIAY's competition here
SWSDF vs TPDKY Comparison February 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 30.9B. In comparison, TPDKY has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,081.65, while TPDKY trades at $5.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.08, whereas TPDKY's P/E ratio is 29.75. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TPDKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and TPDKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TPDKY's competition here
SWSDF vs TPDNF Comparison February 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 30.9B. In comparison, TPDNF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,081.65, while TPDNF trades at $51.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.08, whereas TPDNF's P/E ratio is 28.46. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TPDNF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to TPDNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.Check TPDNF's competition here
SWSDF vs DIISF Comparison February 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 30.9B. In comparison, DIISF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,081.65, while DIISF trades at $3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.08, whereas DIISF's P/E ratio is 23.20. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DIISF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and DIISF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DIISF's competition here
SWSDF vs GIVSY Comparison February 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 30.9B. In comparison, GIVSY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,081.65, while GIVSY trades at $19.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.08, whereas GIVSY's P/E ratio is 4.70. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GIVSY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and GIVSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GIVSY's competition here
SWSDF vs ABDBY Comparison February 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 30.9B. In comparison, ABDBY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,081.65, while ABDBY trades at $5.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.08, whereas ABDBY's P/E ratio is 23.27. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ABDBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and ABDBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ABDBY's competition here
SWSDF vs GIVPY Comparison February 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 30.9B. In comparison, GIVPY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,081.65, while GIVPY trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.08, whereas GIVPY's P/E ratio is 2.02. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GIVPY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and GIVPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GIVPY's competition here
SWSDF vs AFFT Comparison February 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 30.9B. In comparison, AFFT has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,081.65, while AFFT trades at $16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.08, whereas AFFT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AFFT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and AFFT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AFFT's competition here
SWSDF vs AFFS Comparison February 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 30.9B. In comparison, AFFS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,081.65, while AFFS trades at $16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.08, whereas AFFS's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AFFS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and AFFS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AFFS's competition here
SWSDF vs GCNJF Comparison February 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 30.9B. In comparison, GCNJF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,081.65, while GCNJF trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.08, whereas GCNJF's P/E ratio is 6.36. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GCNJF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and GCNJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GCNJF's competition here
SWSDF vs MNRHF Comparison February 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 30.9B. In comparison, MNRHF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,081.65, while MNRHF trades at $25.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.08, whereas MNRHF's P/E ratio is 7.30. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MNRHF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and MNRHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MNRHF's competition here
SWSDF vs BLHEY Comparison February 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 30.9B. In comparison, BLHEY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,081.65, while BLHEY trades at $23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.08, whereas BLHEY's P/E ratio is 19.58. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BLHEY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and BLHEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BLHEY's competition here
SWSDF vs AIFIF Comparison February 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 30.9B. In comparison, AIFIF has a market cap of 462.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,081.65, while AIFIF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.08, whereas AIFIF's P/E ratio is 4.83. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AIFIF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and AIFIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AIFIF's competition here
SWSDF vs VNRFY Comparison February 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 30.9B. In comparison, VNRFY has a market cap of 424.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,081.65, while VNRFY trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.08, whereas VNRFY's P/E ratio is 13.26. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VNRFY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and VNRFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VNRFY's competition here
SWSDF vs SGPLF Comparison February 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 30.9B. In comparison, SGPLF has a market cap of 287.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,081.65, while SGPLF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.08, whereas SGPLF's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SGPLF's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and SGPLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SGPLF's competition here
SWSDF vs ERPRF Comparison February 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 30.9B. In comparison, ERPRF has a market cap of 163.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,081.65, while ERPRF trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.08, whereas ERPRF's P/E ratio is 7.54. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ERPRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and ERPRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ERPRF's competition here
SWSDF vs TSCHY Comparison February 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 30.9B. In comparison, TSCHY has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,081.65, while TSCHY trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.08, whereas TSCHY's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TSCHY's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and TSCHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TSCHY's competition here
SWSDF vs NDEV Comparison February 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 30.9B. In comparison, NDEV has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,081.65, while NDEV trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.08, whereas NDEV's P/E ratio is 15.33. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NDEV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to NDEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.Check NDEV's competition here
SWSDF vs CNCPF Comparison February 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 30.9B. In comparison, CNCPF has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,081.65, while CNCPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.08, whereas CNCPF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CNCPF's ROE of +2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and CNCPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNCPF's competition here
SWSDF vs CWID Comparison February 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 30.9B. In comparison, CWID has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,081.65, while CWID trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.08, whereas CWID's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CWID's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to CWID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.Check CWID's competition here