Swiss Life Holding AG
Swiss Life Holding AG (SWSDF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SWSDF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SWSDF | $1,145.00 | +7.31% | 32.7B | 21.59 | $53.03 | +3.82% |
| ALIZF | $413.78 | +0.46% | 157.9B | 12.96 | $31.92 | +4.26% |
| ALIZY | $41.42 | +2.47% | 157.7B | 13.00 | $3.19 | +4.11% |
| SAXPY | $21.82 | +2.59% | 117.1B | 12.78 | $1.71 | +3.53% |
| ZURVY | $34.86 | +2.95% | 103.8B | 14.73 | $2.36 | +4.88% |
| ZFSVF | $684.18 | +0.80% | 102.2B | 14.50 | $47.17 | +4.97% |
| AXAHY | $44.42 | +1.72% | 93B | 8.22 | $5.41 | +5.48% |
| AXAHF | $43.82 | +0.25% | 91.7B | 8.10 | $5.41 | +5.55% |
| ARZGF | $40.59 | +0.00% | 61.6B | 13.62 | $2.98 | +3.93% |
| ARZGY | $19.92 | +2.57% | 60.4B | 13.63 | $1.46 | +4.06% |
Stock Comparison
SWSDF vs ALIZF Comparison March 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 32.7B. In comparison, ALIZF has a market cap of 157.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,145.00, while ALIZF trades at $413.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas ALIZF's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ALIZF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to ALIZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.Check ALIZF's competition here
SWSDF vs ALIZY Comparison March 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 32.7B. In comparison, ALIZY has a market cap of 157.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,145.00, while ALIZY trades at $41.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas ALIZY's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ALIZY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to ALIZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.Check ALIZY's competition here
SWSDF vs SAXPY Comparison March 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 32.7B. In comparison, SAXPY has a market cap of 117.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,145.00, while SAXPY trades at $21.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas SAXPY's P/E ratio is 12.78. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SAXPY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to SAXPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.Check SAXPY's competition here
SWSDF vs ZURVY Comparison March 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 32.7B. In comparison, ZURVY has a market cap of 103.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,145.00, while ZURVY trades at $34.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas ZURVY's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ZURVY's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to ZURVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.Check ZURVY's competition here
SWSDF vs ZFSVF Comparison March 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 32.7B. In comparison, ZFSVF has a market cap of 102.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,145.00, while ZFSVF trades at $684.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas ZFSVF's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ZFSVF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and ZFSVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZFSVF's competition here
SWSDF vs AXAHY Comparison March 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 32.7B. In comparison, AXAHY has a market cap of 93B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,145.00, while AXAHY trades at $44.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas AXAHY's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AXAHY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to AXAHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.Check AXAHY's competition here
SWSDF vs AXAHF Comparison March 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 32.7B. In comparison, AXAHF has a market cap of 91.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,145.00, while AXAHF trades at $43.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas AXAHF's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AXAHF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and AXAHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AXAHF's competition here
SWSDF vs ARZGF Comparison March 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 32.7B. In comparison, ARZGF has a market cap of 61.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,145.00, while ARZGF trades at $40.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas ARZGF's P/E ratio is 13.62. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ARZGF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and ARZGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ARZGF's competition here
SWSDF vs ARZGY Comparison March 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 32.7B. In comparison, ARZGY has a market cap of 60.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,145.00, while ARZGY trades at $19.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas ARZGY's P/E ratio is 13.63. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ARZGY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to ARZGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.Check ARZGY's competition here
SWSDF vs TNXXF Comparison March 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 32.7B. In comparison, TNXXF has a market cap of 33.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,145.00, while TNXXF trades at $131.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas TNXXF's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TNXXF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and TNXXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TNXXF's competition here
SWSDF vs TLLXY Comparison March 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 32.7B. In comparison, TLLXY has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,145.00, while TLLXY trades at $59.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas TLLXY's P/E ratio is 11.42. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TLLXY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and TLLXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TLLXY's competition here
SWSDF vs SZLMY Comparison March 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 32.7B. In comparison, SZLMY has a market cap of 30.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,145.00, while SZLMY trades at $52.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas SZLMY's P/E ratio is 19.88. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SZLMY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to SZLMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.Check SZLMY's competition here
SWSDF vs SAXPF Comparison March 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 32.7B. In comparison, SAXPF has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,145.00, while SAXPF trades at $10.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas SAXPF's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SAXPF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and SAXPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SAXPF's competition here
SWSDF vs AVVIY Comparison March 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 32.7B. In comparison, AVVIY has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,145.00, while AVVIY trades at $17.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas AVVIY's P/E ratio is 24.36. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AVVIY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to AVVIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.Check AVVIY's competition here
SWSDF vs AIVAF Comparison March 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 32.7B. In comparison, AIVAF has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,145.00, while AIVAF trades at $8.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas AIVAF's P/E ratio is 23.54. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AIVAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to AIVAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.Check AIVAF's competition here
SWSDF vs NNGRY Comparison March 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 32.7B. In comparison, NNGRY has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,145.00, while NNGRY trades at $38.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas NNGRY's P/E ratio is 15.82. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NNGRY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to NNGRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.Check NNGRY's competition here
SWSDF vs NNGPF Comparison March 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 32.7B. In comparison, NNGPF has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,145.00, while NNGPF trades at $75.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas NNGPF's P/E ratio is 13.63. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NNGPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and NNGPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NNGPF's competition here
SWSDF vs UFGSY Comparison March 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 32.7B. In comparison, UFGSY has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,145.00, while UFGSY trades at $11.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas UFGSY's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to UFGSY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and UFGSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UFGSY's competition here
SWSDF vs TGVSF Comparison March 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 32.7B. In comparison, TGVSF has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,145.00, while TGVSF trades at $23.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas TGVSF's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TGVSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and TGVSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TGVSF's competition here
SWSDF vs GJNSY Comparison March 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 32.7B. In comparison, GJNSY has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,145.00, while GJNSY trades at $26.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas GJNSY's P/E ratio is 21.07. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GJNSY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to GJNSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.Check GJNSY's competition here
SWSDF vs HLVTY Comparison March 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 32.7B. In comparison, HLVTY has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,145.00, while HLVTY trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas HLVTY's P/E ratio is 19.24. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HLVTY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and HLVTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HLVTY's competition here
SWSDF vs AGESY Comparison March 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 32.7B. In comparison, AGESY has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,145.00, while AGESY trades at $69.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas AGESY's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AGESY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to AGESY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.Check AGESY's competition here
SWSDF vs AGESF Comparison March 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 32.7B. In comparison, AGESF has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,145.00, while AGESF trades at $68.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas AGESF's P/E ratio is 9.25. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AGESF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to AGESF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.Check AGESF's competition here
SWSDF vs BBSEY Comparison March 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 32.7B. In comparison, BBSEY has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,145.00, while BBSEY trades at $6.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas BBSEY's P/E ratio is 7.51. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BBSEY's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to BBSEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.Check BBSEY's competition here
SWSDF vs MPFRF Comparison March 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 32.7B. In comparison, MPFRF has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,145.00, while MPFRF trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas MPFRF's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MPFRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and MPFRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MPFRF's competition here
SWSDF vs HELNF Comparison March 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 32.7B. In comparison, HELNF has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,145.00, while HELNF trades at $245.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas HELNF's P/E ratio is 18.77. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HELNF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and HELNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HELNF's competition here
SWSDF vs AEGOF Comparison March 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 32.7B. In comparison, AEGOF has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,145.00, while AEGOF trades at $7.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas AEGOF's P/E ratio is 8.01. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AEGOF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and AEGOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AEGOF's competition here
SWSDF vs BLHEF Comparison March 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 32.7B. In comparison, BLHEF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,145.00, while BLHEF trades at $236.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas BLHEF's P/E ratio is 19.29. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BLHEF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to BLHEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.Check BLHEF's competition here
SWSDF vs VNRGF Comparison March 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 32.7B. In comparison, VNRGF has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,145.00, while VNRGF trades at $78.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas VNRGF's P/E ratio is 12.88. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VNRGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and VNRGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VNRGF's competition here
SWSDF vs IAFNF Comparison March 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 32.7B. In comparison, IAFNF has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,145.00, while IAFNF trades at $109.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas IAFNF's P/E ratio is 13.01. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IAFNF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and IAFNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IAFNF's competition here
SWSDF vs SLFIF Comparison March 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 32.7B. In comparison, SLFIF has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,145.00, while SLFIF trades at $15.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas SLFIF's P/E ratio is 3.05. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SLFIF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and SLFIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SLFIF's competition here
SWSDF vs UNPLF Comparison March 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 32.7B. In comparison, UNPLF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,145.00, while UNPLF trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas UNPLF's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to UNPLF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and UNPLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UNPLF's competition here
SWSDF vs GJNSF Comparison March 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 32.7B. In comparison, GJNSF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,145.00, while GJNSF trades at $15.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas GJNSF's P/E ratio is 16.92. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GJNSF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to GJNSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.Check GJNSF's competition here
SWSDF vs SUNFF Comparison March 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 32.7B. In comparison, SUNFF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,145.00, while SUNFF trades at $11.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas SUNFF's P/E ratio is 2.29. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SUNFF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to SUNFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.Check SUNFF's competition here
SWSDF vs RMRHF Comparison March 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 32.7B. In comparison, RMRHF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,145.00, while RMRHF trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas RMRHF's P/E ratio is 23.38. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RMRHF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and RMRHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RMRHF's competition here
SWSDF vs FDIAY Comparison March 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 32.7B. In comparison, FDIAY has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,145.00, while FDIAY trades at $9.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas FDIAY's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FDIAY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and FDIAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FDIAY's competition here
SWSDF vs MPFRY Comparison March 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 32.7B. In comparison, MPFRY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,145.00, while MPFRY trades at $7.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas MPFRY's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MPFRY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to MPFRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.Check MPFRY's competition here
SWSDF vs TPDKY Comparison March 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 32.7B. In comparison, TPDKY has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,145.00, while TPDKY trades at $5.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas TPDKY's P/E ratio is 29.75. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TPDKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and TPDKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TPDKY's competition here
SWSDF vs TPDNF Comparison March 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 32.7B. In comparison, TPDNF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,145.00, while TPDNF trades at $51.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas TPDNF's P/E ratio is 28.46. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TPDNF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to TPDNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.Check TPDNF's competition here
SWSDF vs DIISF Comparison March 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 32.7B. In comparison, DIISF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,145.00, while DIISF trades at $3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas DIISF's P/E ratio is 23.20. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DIISF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and DIISF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DIISF's competition here
SWSDF vs GIVSY Comparison March 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 32.7B. In comparison, GIVSY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,145.00, while GIVSY trades at $19.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas GIVSY's P/E ratio is 4.70. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GIVSY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and GIVSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GIVSY's competition here
SWSDF vs GIVPY Comparison March 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 32.7B. In comparison, GIVPY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,145.00, while GIVPY trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas GIVPY's P/E ratio is 2.11. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GIVPY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to GIVPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.Check GIVPY's competition here
SWSDF vs ABDBY Comparison March 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 32.7B. In comparison, ABDBY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,145.00, while ABDBY trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas ABDBY's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ABDBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and ABDBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ABDBY's competition here
SWSDF vs AFFT Comparison March 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 32.7B. In comparison, AFFT has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,145.00, while AFFT trades at $16.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas AFFT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AFFT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and AFFT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AFFT's competition here
SWSDF vs AFFS Comparison March 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 32.7B. In comparison, AFFS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,145.00, while AFFS trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas AFFS's P/E ratio is 16.38. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AFFS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to AFFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.Check AFFS's competition here
SWSDF vs GCNJF Comparison March 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 32.7B. In comparison, GCNJF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,145.00, while GCNJF trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas GCNJF's P/E ratio is 6.36. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GCNJF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and GCNJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GCNJF's competition here
SWSDF vs MNRHF Comparison March 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 32.7B. In comparison, MNRHF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,145.00, while MNRHF trades at $25.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas MNRHF's P/E ratio is 7.30. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MNRHF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and MNRHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MNRHF's competition here
SWSDF vs BLHEY Comparison March 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 32.7B. In comparison, BLHEY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,145.00, while BLHEY trades at $23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas BLHEY's P/E ratio is 19.58. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BLHEY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and BLHEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BLHEY's competition here
SWSDF vs AIFIF Comparison March 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 32.7B. In comparison, AIFIF has a market cap of 462.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,145.00, while AIFIF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas AIFIF's P/E ratio is 4.83. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AIFIF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and AIFIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AIFIF's competition here
SWSDF vs VNRFY Comparison March 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 32.7B. In comparison, VNRFY has a market cap of 384.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,145.00, while VNRFY trades at $15.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas VNRFY's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VNRFY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and VNRFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VNRFY's competition here
SWSDF vs SGPLF Comparison March 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 32.7B. In comparison, SGPLF has a market cap of 287.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,145.00, while SGPLF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas SGPLF's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SGPLF's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and SGPLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SGPLF's competition here
SWSDF vs ERPRF Comparison March 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 32.7B. In comparison, ERPRF has a market cap of 163.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,145.00, while ERPRF trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas ERPRF's P/E ratio is 7.54. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ERPRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and ERPRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ERPRF's competition here
SWSDF vs TSCHY Comparison March 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 32.7B. In comparison, TSCHY has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,145.00, while TSCHY trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas TSCHY's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TSCHY's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and TSCHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TSCHY's competition here
SWSDF vs NDEV Comparison March 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 32.7B. In comparison, NDEV has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,145.00, while NDEV trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas NDEV's P/E ratio is 15.10. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NDEV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to NDEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.Check NDEV's competition here
SWSDF vs CNCPF Comparison March 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 32.7B. In comparison, CNCPF has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,145.00, while CNCPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas CNCPF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CNCPF's ROE of +2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF and CNCPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNCPF's competition here
SWSDF vs CWID Comparison March 2026
SWSDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWSDF stands at 32.7B. In comparison, CWID has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SWSDF is priced at $1,145.00, while CWID trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWSDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas CWID's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWSDF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CWID's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SWSDF is less volatile compared to CWID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWSDF.Check CWID's competition here