Swire Pacific Limited

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, HON has a market cap of 137.90B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while HON trades at $214.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas HON's P/E ratio is 24.69. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HON's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to HON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, HTHIF has a market cap of 121.66B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while HTHIF trades at $26.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas HTHIF's P/E ratio is 28.27. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HTHIF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to HTHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, MSBHF has a market cap of 76.37B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while MSBHF trades at $19.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas MSBHF's P/E ratio is 11.64. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MSBHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to MSBHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, MTSUY has a market cap of 75.46B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while MTSUY trades at $18.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas MTSUY's P/E ratio is 11.64. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MTSUY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to MTSUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, MMM has a market cap of 74.56B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while MMM trades at $138.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas MMM's P/E ratio is 17.25. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MMM's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to MMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, ITOCF has a market cap of 72.02B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while ITOCF trades at $50.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas ITOCF's P/E ratio is 11.95. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ITOCF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to ITOCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, ITOCY has a market cap of 71.67B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while ITOCY trades at $101.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas ITOCY's P/E ratio is 11.74. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ITOCY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to ITOCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, HTHIY has a market cap of 60.86B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while HTHIY trades at $26.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas HTHIY's P/E ratio is 28.29. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HTHIY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to HTHIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, MITSF has a market cap of 57.53B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while MITSF trades at $20.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas MITSF's P/E ratio is 9.49. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MITSF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to MITSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, MITSY has a market cap of 57.20B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while MITSY trades at $398.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas MITSY's P/E ratio is 9.41. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MITSY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to MITSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, CTPCF has a market cap of 35.49B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while CTPCF trades at $1.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas CTPCF's P/E ratio is 4.52. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CTPCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to CTPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, CTPCY has a market cap of 34.84B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while CTPCY trades at $5.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas CTPCY's P/E ratio is 4.36. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CTPCY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to CTPCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, MARUF has a market cap of 31.81B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while MARUF trades at $19.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas MARUF's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MARUF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to MARUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, MARUY has a market cap of 31.35B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while MARUY trades at $187.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas MARUY's P/E ratio is 8.96. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MARUY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to MARUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, SSUMF has a market cap of 30.73B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while SSUMF trades at $25.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas SSUMF's P/E ratio is 7.96. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SSUMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to SSUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, SSUMY has a market cap of 30.47B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while SSUMY trades at $25.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas SSUMY's P/E ratio is 7.92. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SSUMY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to SSUMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, PITAF has a market cap of 26.60B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while PITAF trades at $20.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas PITAF's P/E ratio is 11.81. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PITAF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to PITAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, BLJZY has a market cap of 25.65B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while BLJZY trades at $6.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas BLJZY's P/E ratio is 22.07. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BLJZY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to BLJZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, CKHUF has a market cap of 22.98B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while CKHUF trades at $6.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas CKHUF's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CKHUF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and CKHUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, CKHUY has a market cap of 21.83B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while CKHUY trades at $5.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas CKHUY's P/E ratio is 9.83. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CKHUY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to CKHUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, TYHOF has a market cap of 19.67B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while TYHOF trades at $18.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas TYHOF's P/E ratio is 7.76. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TYHOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and TYHOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, GPOVY has a market cap of 15.96B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while GPOVY trades at $14.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas GPOVY's P/E ratio is 14.58. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GPOVY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to GPOVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, GPOVF has a market cap of 15.80B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while GPOVF trades at $7.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas GPOVF's P/E ratio is 20.59. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GPOVF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and GPOVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, HALMY has a market cap of 14.72B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while HALMY trades at $77.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas HALMY's P/E ratio is 38.98. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HALMY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to HALMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, HLMAF has a market cap of 14.51B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while HLMAF trades at $38.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas HLMAF's P/E ratio is 38.05. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HLMAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to HLMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, JMHLY has a market cap of 14.09B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while JMHLY trades at $48.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas JMHLY's P/E ratio is -30.02. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JMHLY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to JMHLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, KBDCY has a market cap of 13.96B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while KBDCY trades at $12.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas KBDCY's P/E ratio is 13.26. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KBDCY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and KBDCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, JARLF has a market cap of 12.72B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while JARLF trades at $43.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas JARLF's P/E ratio is -27.10. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JARLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to JARLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, SWRBF has a market cap of 11.65B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while SWRBF trades at $1.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas SWRBF's P/E ratio is 3.77. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SWRBF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and SWRBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, SWRAY has a market cap of 10.87B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while SWRAY trades at $8.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas SWRAY's P/E ratio is 22.72. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SWRAY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to SWRAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, SWRAF has a market cap of 9.88B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while SWRAF trades at $8.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas SWRAF's P/E ratio is 20.51. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SWRAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to SWRAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, KPELY has a market cap of 9.43B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while KPELY trades at $10.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas KPELY's P/E ratio is 14.84. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KPELY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to KPELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, KPELF has a market cap of 9.03B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while KPELF trades at $5.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas KPELF's P/E ratio is 14.29. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KPELF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to KPELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, KHOLY has a market cap of 8.93B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while KHOLY trades at $17.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas KHOLY's P/E ratio is 251.71. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KHOLY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to KHOLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, SCRPF has a market cap of 6.99B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while SCRPF trades at $3.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas SCRPF's P/E ratio is 9.16. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SCRPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to SCRPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, SKSUY has a market cap of 6.75B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while SKSUY trades at $80.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas SKSUY's P/E ratio is 11.07. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SKSUY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to SKSUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, SEIBF has a market cap of 6.60B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while SEIBF trades at $10.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas SEIBF's P/E ratio is 22.27. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SEIBF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to SEIBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, HYUHF has a market cap of 6.54B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while HYUHF trades at $27.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas HYUHF's P/E ratio is 12.86. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HYUHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and HYUHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, MYTHY has a market cap of 6.45B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while MYTHY trades at $46.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas MYTHY's P/E ratio is 9.26. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MYTHY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and MYTHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, MYTHF has a market cap of 6.45B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while MYTHF trades at $44.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas MYTHF's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MYTHF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to MYTHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, AYYLF has a market cap of 6.42B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while AYYLF trades at $10.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas AYYLF's P/E ratio is 8.88. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AYYLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to AYYLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, FCODF has a market cap of 6.40B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while FCODF trades at $1,511.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas FCODF's P/E ratio is -8.58. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FCODF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to FCODF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, SCVPF has a market cap of 6.12B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while SCVPF trades at $4.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas SCVPF's P/E ratio is 32.60. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SCVPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and SCVPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, VMI has a market cap of 6.04B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while VMI trades at $300.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas VMI's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VMI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to VMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, AYALY has a market cap of 5.99B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while AYALY trades at $9.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas AYALY's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AYALY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to AYALY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, JGSHF has a market cap of 4.82B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while JGSHF trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas JGSHF's P/E ratio is 16.02. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JGSHF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to JGSHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, BDVSF has a market cap of 4.78B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while BDVSF trades at $14.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas BDVSF's P/E ratio is 14.48. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BDVSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and BDVSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, FOSUY has a market cap of 4.65B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while FOSUY trades at $14.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas FOSUY's P/E ratio is -7.84. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FOSUY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to FOSUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, SZHFF has a market cap of 4.53B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while SZHFF trades at $21.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas SZHFF's P/E ratio is 5.99. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SZHFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and SZHFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, KHEXF has a market cap of 4.47B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while KHEXF trades at $16.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas KHEXF's P/E ratio is -22.96. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KHEXF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and KHEXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, BJINF has a market cap of 4.40B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while BJINF trades at $3.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas BJINF's P/E ratio is 6.36. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BJINF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to BJINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, BDVSY has a market cap of 4.39B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while BDVSY trades at $25.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas BDVSY's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BDVSY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to BDVSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, IEP has a market cap of 4.36B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while IEP trades at $8.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas IEP's P/E ratio is -8.88. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IEP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to IEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, ALFFF has a market cap of 4.17B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while ALFFF trades at $0.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas ALFFF's P/E ratio is -75.00. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALFFF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and ALFFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, FOSUF has a market cap of 4.07B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while FOSUF trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas FOSUF's P/E ratio is -7.14. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FOSUF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to FOSUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, KTERF has a market cap of 4.04B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while KTERF trades at $36.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas KTERF's P/E ratio is 48.78. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KTERF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and KTERF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, KINUF has a market cap of 4.00B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while KINUF trades at $21.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas KINUF's P/E ratio is 13.30. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KINUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to KINUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, MDU has a market cap of 3.59B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while MDU trades at $17.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas MDU's P/E ratio is 19.99. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MDU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to MDU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, AKAAF has a market cap of 3.55B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while AKAAF trades at $47.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas AKAAF's P/E ratio is 5.62. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AKAAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and AKAAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, JGSMY has a market cap of 3.43B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while JGSMY trades at $9.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas JGSMY's P/E ratio is 8.76. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JGSMY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and JGSMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, SMGBF has a market cap of 3.28B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while SMGBF trades at $1.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas SMGBF's P/E ratio is -10.58. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SMGBF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to SMGBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, GFF has a market cap of 3.22B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while GFF trades at $67.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas GFF's P/E ratio is 13.84. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GFF's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to GFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, NARRF has a market cap of 3.08B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while NARRF trades at $15.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas NARRF's P/E ratio is -29.07. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NARRF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to NARRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, GULRF has a market cap of 2.89B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while GULRF trades at $8.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas GULRF's P/E ratio is 5.73. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GULRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to GULRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, KBDCF has a market cap of 2.56B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while KBDCF trades at $2.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas KBDCF's P/E ratio is 9.24. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KBDCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and KBDCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, SEB has a market cap of 2.45B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while SEB trades at $2,525.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas SEB's P/E ratio is 25.03. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SEB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to SEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, VRTV has a market cap of 2.31B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while VRTV trades at $169.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas VRTV's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VRTV's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to VRTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, GULRY has a market cap of 2.24B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while GULRY trades at $13.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas GULRY's P/E ratio is 4.42. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GULRY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to GULRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, IWTNF has a market cap of 1.99B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while IWTNF trades at $8.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas IWTNF's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IWTNF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to IWTNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, BBU has a market cap of 1.91B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while BBU trades at $21.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas BBU's P/E ratio is -61.14. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BBU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to BBU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, TINLF has a market cap of 1.88B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while TINLF trades at $9.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas TINLF's P/E ratio is -7.14. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TINLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and TINLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, CODI-PC has a market cap of 1.75B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while CODI-PC trades at $23.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas CODI-PC's P/E ratio is 26.96. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CODI-PC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to CODI-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, SGHIF has a market cap of 1.62B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while SGHIF trades at $1.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas SGHIF's P/E ratio is 4.52. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SGHIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and SGHIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, NLTBF has a market cap of 1.62B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while NLTBF trades at $6.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas NLTBF's P/E ratio is 31.58. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NLTBF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and NLTBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, TINLY has a market cap of 1.61B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while TINLY trades at $8.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas TINLY's P/E ratio is -5.04. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TINLY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to TINLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, SGHIY has a market cap of 1.61B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while SGHIY trades at $14.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas SGHIY's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SGHIY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and SGHIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, MMSMY has a market cap of 1.56B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while MMSMY trades at $5.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas MMSMY's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MMSMY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and MMSMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, CHCLY has a market cap of 1.49B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while CHCLY trades at $30.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas CHCLY's P/E ratio is 8.69. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CHCLY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and CHCLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, NICFF has a market cap of 1.48B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while NICFF trades at $22.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas NICFF's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NICFF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and NICFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, MPCFF has a market cap of 1.43B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while MPCFF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas MPCFF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MPCFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and MPCFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, CODI-PA has a market cap of 1.32B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while CODI-PA trades at $22.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas CODI-PA's P/E ratio is 26.36. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CODI-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to CODI-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, CODI-PB has a market cap of 1.30B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while CODI-PB trades at $22.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas CODI-PB's P/E ratio is 26.70. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CODI-PB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to CODI-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, CODI has a market cap of 1.30B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while CODI trades at $17.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas CODI's P/E ratio is -13.79. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CODI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to CODI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, XZJCF has a market cap of 1.29B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while XZJCF trades at $22.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas XZJCF's P/E ratio is -18.09. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to XZJCF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to XZJCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, BNHUF has a market cap of 1.15B. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while BNHUF trades at $27.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas BNHUF's P/E ratio is -9.89. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BNHUF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and BNHUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, ALGGY has a market cap of 976.36M. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while ALGGY trades at $5.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas ALGGY's P/E ratio is 2.80. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALGGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and ALGGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, BRYAF has a market cap of 917.77M. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while BRYAF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas BRYAF's P/E ratio is 5.72. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BRYAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to BRYAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, NSHBY has a market cap of 836.91M. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while NSHBY trades at $10.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas NSHBY's P/E ratio is 11.83. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NSHBY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to NSHBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, GRGCF has a market cap of 831.71M. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while GRGCF trades at $22.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas GRGCF's P/E ratio is 6.64. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GRGCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to GRGCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, ALGGF has a market cap of 723.55M. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while ALGGF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas ALGGF's P/E ratio is 2.08. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALGGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to ALGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, SPLP has a market cap of 708.57M. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while SPLP trades at $37.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas SPLP's P/E ratio is 3.25. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SPLP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to SPLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, MTLZF has a market cap of 683.97M. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while MTLZF trades at $1,525.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas MTLZF's P/E ratio is 26.38. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MTLZF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and MTLZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, CRESY has a market cap of 647.74M. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while CRESY trades at $10.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas CRESY's P/E ratio is -8.45. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CRESY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to CRESY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, MATW has a market cap of 592.26M. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while MATW trades at $19.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas MATW's P/E ratio is -7.49. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MATW's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to MATW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, SHMWF has a market cap of 575.65M. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while SHMWF trades at $8.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas SHMWF's P/E ratio is 10.13. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SHMWF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to SHMWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, INDHF has a market cap of 548.25M. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while INDHF trades at $21.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas INDHF's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to INDHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to INDHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, KKRAF has a market cap of 544.68M. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while KKRAF trades at $16.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas KKRAF's P/E ratio is 27.67. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KKRAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and KKRAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, FIP has a market cap of 522.16M. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while FIP trades at $4.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas FIP's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FIP's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to FIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, CRESW has a market cap of 493.15M. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while CRESW trades at $0.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas CRESW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CRESW's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to CRESW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, TRC has a market cap of 464.01M. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while TRC trades at $17.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas TRC's P/E ratio is 172.70. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TRC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to TRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, CVVIF has a market cap of 436.66M. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while CVVIF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas CVVIF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CVVIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to CVVIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, SPLP-PA has a market cap of 369.78M. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while SPLP-PA trades at $23.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas SPLP-PA's P/E ratio is 6.46. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SPLP-PA's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to SPLP-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, FIPWV has a market cap of 328.17M. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while FIPWV trades at $3.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas FIPWV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FIPWV's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to FIPWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, BEVFF has a market cap of 322.00M. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while BEVFF trades at $2.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas BEVFF's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BEVFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and BEVFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, FBYD has a market cap of 267.29M. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while FBYD trades at $7.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas FBYD's P/E ratio is 5.09. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FBYD's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to FBYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, CEEIF has a market cap of 266.24M. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while CEEIF trades at $23.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas CEEIF's P/E ratio is 26.59. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CEEIF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to CEEIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, TJSCF has a market cap of 261.33M. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while TJSCF trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas TJSCF's P/E ratio is 3.48. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TJSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to TJSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, HGRVF has a market cap of 241.91M. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while HGRVF trades at $7.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas HGRVF's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HGRVF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to HGRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, DMCHY has a market cap of 219.08M. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while DMCHY trades at $1.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas DMCHY's P/E ratio is 6.35. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DMCHY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and DMCHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, THAFF has a market cap of 164.02M. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while THAFF trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas THAFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to THAFF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to THAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, YMAIF has a market cap of 139.03M. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while YMAIF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas YMAIF's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to YMAIF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to YMAIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, RCMT has a market cap of 132.75M. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while RCMT trades at $17.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas RCMT's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RCMT's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to RCMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, TUSK has a market cap of 120.80M. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while TUSK trades at $2.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas TUSK's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TUSK's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to TUSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, IRS has a market cap of 104.94M. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while IRS trades at $14.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas IRS's P/E ratio is -3.47. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IRS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to IRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, NNBR has a market cap of 91.26M. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while NNBR trades at $1.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas NNBR's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NNBR's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to NNBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, ICBT has a market cap of 88.57M. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while ICBT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas ICBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ICBT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to ICBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, NOBGF has a market cap of 79.28M. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while NOBGF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas NOBGF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NOBGF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and NOBGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, APTL has a market cap of 77.48M. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while APTL trades at $60.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas APTL's P/E ratio is 5.84. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to APTL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to APTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, RSDEF has a market cap of 76.67M. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while RSDEF trades at $2.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas RSDEF's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RSDEF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to RSDEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, ECSL has a market cap of 66.82M. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while ECSL trades at $0.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas ECSL's P/E ratio is -44.21. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ECSL's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to ECSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, PRTT has a market cap of 58.60M. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while PRTT trades at $1.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas PRTT's P/E ratio is -51.00. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PRTT's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to PRTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, BNIGF has a market cap of 49.05M. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while BNIGF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas BNIGF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BNIGF's ROE of -1.79%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to BNIGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, GTII has a market cap of 47.55M. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while GTII trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas GTII's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GTII's ROE of -79.89%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and GTII have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, CIBY has a market cap of 40.80M. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while CIBY trades at $1,632.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas CIBY's P/E ratio is -111.07. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CIBY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and CIBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, SBOX has a market cap of 37.11M. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while SBOX trades at $0.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas SBOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SBOX's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to SBOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, FBYDW has a market cap of 34.85M. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while FBYDW trades at $1.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas FBYDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FBYDW's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and FBYDW have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, SUNTF has a market cap of 30.62M. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while SUNTF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas SUNTF's P/E ratio is -1.99. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SUNTF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to SUNTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, IGC has a market cap of 23.35M. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while IGC trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas IGC's P/E ratio is -2.44. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IGC's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to IGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, TICJ has a market cap of 17.84M. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while TICJ trades at $0.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas TICJ's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TICJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to TICJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, GLOH has a market cap of 14.63M. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while GLOH trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas GLOH's P/E ratio is -72.45. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GLOH's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to GLOH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, GRPX has a market cap of 10.91M. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while GRPX trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas GRPX's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GRPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to GRPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, UMCN has a market cap of 8.52M. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while UMCN trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas UMCN's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UMCN's ROE of -4.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to UMCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, UATG has a market cap of 3.80M. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while UATG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas UATG's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UATG's ROE of +6.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to UATG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, GTLL has a market cap of 3.67M. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while GTLL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas GTLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GTLL's ROE of +2.99%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to GTLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, MONI has a market cap of 3.65M. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while MONI trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas MONI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MONI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and MONI have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, CNGI has a market cap of 3.43M. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while CNGI trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas CNGI's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNGI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to CNGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, SNTE has a market cap of 3.13M. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while SNTE trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas SNTE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SNTE's ROE of -22.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to SNTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, ABLT has a market cap of 3.06M. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while ABLT trades at $90.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas ABLT's P/E ratio is -8.58. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ABLT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to ABLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, SAHN has a market cap of 2.49M. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while SAHN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas SAHN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SAHN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and SAHN have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, RJDG has a market cap of 2.23M. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while RJDG trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas RJDG's P/E ratio is 0.62. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RJDG's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and RJDG have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, ROSSF has a market cap of 2.08M. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while ROSSF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas ROSSF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ROSSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and ROSSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, TTHG has a market cap of 1.94M. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while TTHG trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas TTHG's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TTHG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to TTHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, EFSH has a market cap of 1.88M. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while EFSH trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas EFSH's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EFSH's ROE of +2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to EFSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, FUNN has a market cap of 1.82M. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while FUNN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas FUNN's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FUNN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to FUNN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, ACMB has a market cap of 1.31M. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while ACMB trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas ACMB's P/E ratio is -2.53. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ACMB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to ACMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, HLLK has a market cap of 995458.00. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while HLLK trades at $0.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas HLLK's P/E ratio is 135.71. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HLLK's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to HLLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, AXXA has a market cap of 581091.00. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while AXXA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas AXXA's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AXXA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to AXXA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, PTEEF has a market cap of 517012.00. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while PTEEF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas PTEEF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PTEEF's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and PTEEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, UPIN has a market cap of 468564.00. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while UPIN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas UPIN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UPIN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and UPIN have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, ATMO has a market cap of 317706.00. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while ATMO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas ATMO's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ATMO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and ATMO have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, CIRX has a market cap of 106821.00. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while CIRX trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas CIRX's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CIRX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and CIRX have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, ELGL has a market cap of 81696.00. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while ELGL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas ELGL's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ELGL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and ELGL have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, SBDG has a market cap of 47880.00. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while SBDG trades at $0.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas SBDG's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SBDG's ROE of +1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and SBDG have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, AEEI has a market cap of 33800.00. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while AEEI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas AEEI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AEEI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and AEEI have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, MGLI has a market cap of 27303.00. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while MGLI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas MGLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MGLI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to MGLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, IVST has a market cap of 22312.00. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while IVST trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas IVST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IVST's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and IVST have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, GEGR has a market cap of 19911.00. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while GEGR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas GEGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GEGR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to GEGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, BCND has a market cap of 19859.00. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while BCND trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas BCND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCND's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to BCND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, ZNNC has a market cap of 16973.00. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while ZNNC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas ZNNC's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ZNNC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to ZNNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, BIMO has a market cap of 16343.00. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while BIMO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas BIMO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BIMO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and BIMO have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, CBCA has a market cap of 16105.00. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while CBCA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas CBCA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CBCA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and CBCA have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, MLCG has a market cap of 15128.00. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while MLCG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas MLCG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MLCG's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and MLCG have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, LWCTF has a market cap of 14072.00. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while LWCTF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas LWCTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LWCTF's ROE of -2.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to LWCTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, MCNO has a market cap of 8906.00. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while MCNO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas MCNO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MCNO's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and MCNO have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, HULK has a market cap of 8478.00. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while HULK trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas HULK's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HULK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and HULK have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, BMMX has a market cap of 6952.00. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while BMMX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas BMMX's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BMMX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and BMMX have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, LPTC has a market cap of 6520.00. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while LPTC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas LPTC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LPTC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to LPTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, NHGP has a market cap of 5100.00. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while NHGP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas NHGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NHGP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to NHGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, NOBGY has a market cap of 1327.00. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while NOBGY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas NOBGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NOBGY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and NOBGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, RAGL has a market cap of 1001.00. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while RAGL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas RAGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RAGL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and RAGL have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, EKNL has a market cap of 317.00. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while EKNL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas EKNL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EKNL's ROE of +3.86%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and EKNL have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, VBVT has a market cap of 247.00. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while VBVT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas VBVT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VBVT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and VBVT have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, AMIN has a market cap of 222.00. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while AMIN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas AMIN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AMIN's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and AMIN have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, AHII has a market cap of 200.00. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while AHII trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas AHII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AHII's ROE of +2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and AHII have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, KGHI has a market cap of 132.00. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while KGHI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas KGHI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KGHI's ROE of -1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to KGHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, SHCC has a market cap of 100.00. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while SHCC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas SHCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SHCC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and SHCC have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, MVPT has a market cap of 56.00. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while MVPT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas MVPT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MVPT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and MVPT have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, RIGG has a market cap of 50.00. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while RIGG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas RIGG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RIGG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and RIGG have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, OBCI comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while OBCI trades at $13.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas OBCI's P/E ratio is 25.55. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OBCI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to OBCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, LIDM comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while LIDM trades at $62.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas LIDM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LIDM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and LIDM have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, PAWH comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while PAWH trades at $8,000.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas PAWH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PAWH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and PAWH have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, STLRU comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while STLRU trades at N/A.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas STLRU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STLRU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SWRBY has daily volatility of 0.00 and STLRU has daily volatility of N/A.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, BDGY comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while BDGY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas BDGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BDGY's ROE of +2.81%. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and BDGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, FNTEU comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while FNTEU trades at N/A.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas FNTEU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FNTEU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SWRBY has daily volatility of 0.00 and FNTEU has daily volatility of N/A.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, SMGBY comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while SMGBY trades at $16.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas SMGBY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SMGBY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY and SMGBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, JBK comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while JBK trades at $25.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas JBK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JBK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SWRBY is less volatile compared to JBK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWRBY.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, ELECU comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while ELECU trades at N/A.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas ELECU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ELECU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SWRBY has daily volatility of 0.00 and ELECU has daily volatility of N/A.

SWRBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWRBY stands at 2.27B. In comparison, DOTAU comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SWRBY is priced at $7.14, while DOTAU trades at N/A.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWRBY currently has a P/E ratio of 3.62, whereas DOTAU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWRBY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DOTAU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SWRBY has daily volatility of 0.00 and DOTAU has daily volatility of N/A.