Swire Properties Limited
Swire Properties Limited SWPFF Peers
See (SWPFF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SWPFF | $2.32 | +3.11% | 13.4B | -116.00 | -$0.02 | +6.09% |
| VNNVF | $36.10 | +2.57% | 30.2B | -36.46 | -$0.99 | +3.88% |
| VONOY | $17.32 | -2.48% | 28.5B | -35.37 | -$0.49 | +3.83% |
| CLNXF | $38.77 | +0.00% | 27.4B | -484.62 | -$0.08 | +0.19% |
| VTAGY | $20.36 | +0.00% | 20.6B | 42.42 | $0.48 | +4.02% |
| VTWRF | $40.06 | +0.00% | 20.3B | 40.06 | $1.00 | +3.72% |
| SURDF | $38.64 | +0.00% | 18.2B | 13.85 | $2.79 | +1.23% |
| SURYY | $17.00 | +0.00% | 16B | 12.14 | $1.40 | N/A |
| IFSUF | $12.44 | -3.57% | 11.6B | 28.27 | $0.44 | +4.63% |
| SWPRF | $135.16 | +0.00% | 10.8B | 24.53 | $5.51 | +2.89% |
Stock Comparison
SWPFF vs VNNVF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, VNNVF has a market cap of 30.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while VNNVF trades at $36.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas VNNVF's P/E ratio is -36.46. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VNNVF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF and VNNVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWPFF vs VONOY Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, VONOY has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while VONOY trades at $17.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas VONOY's P/E ratio is -35.37. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VONOY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF is less volatile compared to VONOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWPFF.
SWPFF vs CLNXF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, CLNXF has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while CLNXF trades at $38.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas CLNXF's P/E ratio is -484.62. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CLNXF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF is less volatile compared to CLNXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWPFF.
SWPFF vs VTAGY Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, VTAGY has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while VTAGY trades at $20.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas VTAGY's P/E ratio is 42.42. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VTAGY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF and VTAGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWPFF vs VTWRF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, VTWRF has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while VTWRF trades at $40.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas VTWRF's P/E ratio is 40.06. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VTWRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF is less volatile compared to VTWRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWPFF.
SWPFF vs SURDF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, SURDF has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while SURDF trades at $38.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas SURDF's P/E ratio is 13.85. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SURDF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF is less volatile compared to SURDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWPFF.
SWPFF vs SURYY Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, SURYY has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while SURYY trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas SURYY's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SURYY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF is less volatile compared to SURYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWPFF.
SWPFF vs IFSUF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, IFSUF has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while IFSUF trades at $12.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas IFSUF's P/E ratio is 28.27. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IFSUF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF and IFSUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWPFF vs SWPRF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, SWPRF has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while SWPRF trades at $135.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas SWPRF's P/E ratio is 24.53. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SWPRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF is less volatile compared to SWPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWPFF.
SWPFF vs CLILF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, CLILF has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while CLILF trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas CLILF's P/E ratio is 30.00. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CLILF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF and CLILF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWPFF vs WRFRF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, WRFRF has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while WRFRF trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas WRFRF's P/E ratio is 71.13. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WRFRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF is less volatile compared to WRFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWPFF.
SWPFF vs AZRGF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, AZRGF has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while AZRGF trades at $69.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas AZRGF's P/E ratio is 20.04. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AZRGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF is less volatile compared to AZRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWPFF.
SWPFF vs HULCF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, HULCF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while HULCF trades at $10.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas HULCF's P/E ratio is 11.73. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HULCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF is less volatile compared to HULCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWPFF.
SWPFF vs ESRCF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, ESRCF has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while ESRCF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas ESRCF's P/E ratio is -9.12. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ESRCF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF is less volatile compared to ESRCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWPFF.
SWPFF vs LGMMY Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, LGMMY has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while LGMMY trades at $21.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas LGMMY's P/E ratio is 4.27. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LGMMY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF and LGMMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWPFF vs LEGIF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, LEGIF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while LEGIF trades at $82.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas LEGIF's P/E ratio is 33.62. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LEGIF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF is less volatile compared to LEGIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWPFF.
SWPFF vs NXDCF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, NXDCF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while NXDCF trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas NXDCF's P/E ratio is -133.62. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NXDCF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF is less volatile compared to NXDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWPFF.
SWPFF vs SCOTF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, SCOTF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while SCOTF trades at $80.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas SCOTF's P/E ratio is 32.39. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SCOTF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF is less volatile compared to SCOTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWPFF.
SWPFF vs HLPPF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, HLPPF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while HLPPF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas HLPPF's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HLPPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF and HLPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWPFF vs HLPPY Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, HLPPY has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while HLPPY trades at $4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas HLPPY's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HLPPY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF is less volatile compared to HLPPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWPFF.
SWPFF vs NMEHF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, NMEHF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while NMEHF trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas NMEHF's P/E ratio is 9.58. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NMEHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF and NMEHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWPFF vs SSSAF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, SSSAF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while SSSAF trades at $43.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas SSSAF's P/E ratio is 9.22. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SSSAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF is less volatile compared to SSSAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWPFF.
SWPFF vs TAGYY Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, TAGYY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while TAGYY trades at $5.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas TAGYY's P/E ratio is -3.55. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TAGYY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF and TAGYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWPFF vs AANNF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, AANNF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while AANNF trades at $3.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas AANNF's P/E ratio is 14.65. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AANNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF is less volatile compared to AANNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWPFF.
SWPFF vs CWSRF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, CWSRF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while CWSRF trades at $13.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas CWSRF's P/E ratio is 90.88. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CWSRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF and CWSRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWPFF vs TYTMF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, TYTMF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while TYTMF trades at $17.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas TYTMF's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TYTMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF is less volatile compared to TYTMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWPFF.
SWPFF vs TAGOF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, TAGOF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while TAGOF trades at $17.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas TAGOF's P/E ratio is 26.11. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TAGOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF is less volatile compared to TAGOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWPFF.
SWPFF vs IWGFF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, IWGFF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while IWGFF trades at $2.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas IWGFF's P/E ratio is 145.60. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IWGFF's ROE of -1.89%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF is less volatile compared to IWGFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWPFF.
SWPFF vs VGPBF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, VGPBF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while VGPBF trades at $105.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas VGPBF's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VGPBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF and VGPBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWPFF vs CTRGF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, CTRGF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while CTRGF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas CTRGF's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CTRGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF is less volatile compared to CTRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWPFF.
SWPFF vs CGSHY Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, CGSHY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while CGSHY trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas CGSHY's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CGSHY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF and CGSHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWPFF vs CNPPF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, CNPPF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while CNPPF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas CNPPF's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CNPPF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF is less volatile compared to CNPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWPFF.
SWPFF vs FBGGF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, FBGGF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while FBGGF trades at $7.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas FBGGF's P/E ratio is 66.00. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FBGGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF is less volatile compared to FBGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWPFF.
SWPFF vs GRGTF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, GRGTF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while GRGTF trades at $3.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas GRGTF's P/E ratio is 15.17. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GRGTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF is less volatile compared to GRGTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWPFF.
SWPFF vs ENTOF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, ENTOF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while ENTOF trades at $11.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas ENTOF's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ENTOF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF is less volatile compared to ENTOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWPFF.
SWPFF vs GRNNF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, GRNNF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while GRNNF trades at $12.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas GRNNF's P/E ratio is 7.84. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GRNNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF is less volatile compared to GRNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWPFF.
SWPFF vs SRRLF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, SRRLF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while SRRLF trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas SRRLF's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SRRLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF is less volatile compared to SRRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWPFF.
SWPFF vs WIHLY Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, WIHLY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while WIHLY trades at $6.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas WIHLY's P/E ratio is 5.60. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WIHLY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF and WIHLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWPFF vs GRDDY Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, GRDDY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while GRDDY trades at $10.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas GRDDY's P/E ratio is 6.81. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GRDDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF is less volatile compared to GRDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWPFF.
SWPFF vs SVLPF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, SVLPF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while SVLPF trades at $13.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas SVLPF's P/E ratio is 26.10. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SVLPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF is less volatile compared to SVLPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWPFF.
SWPFF vs DUSCF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, DUSCF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while DUSCF trades at $22.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas DUSCF's P/E ratio is 20.31. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DUSCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF and DUSCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWPFF vs ASGTF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, ASGTF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while ASGTF trades at $38.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas ASGTF's P/E ratio is 480.25. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ASGTF's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF and ASGTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWPFF vs HYSNF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, HYSNF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while HYSNF trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas HYSNF's P/E ratio is -19.55. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HYSNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF is less volatile compared to HYSNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWPFF.
SWPFF vs FBGBY Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, FBGBY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while FBGBY trades at $18.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas FBGBY's P/E ratio is 4.20. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FBGBY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF and FBGBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWPFF vs EVGPF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, EVGPF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while EVGPF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas EVGPF's P/E ratio is 11.87. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EVGPF's ROE of +4.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF is less volatile compared to EVGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWPFF.
SWPFF vs MEQYF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, MEQYF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while MEQYF trades at $137.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas MEQYF's P/E ratio is 7.15. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MEQYF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF is less volatile compared to MEQYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWPFF.
SWPFF vs ICHIF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, ICHIF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while ICHIF trades at $2.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas ICHIF's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ICHIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF is less volatile compared to ICHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWPFF.
SWPFF vs ACNDF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, ACNDF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while ACNDF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas ACNDF's P/E ratio is 3.17. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ACNDF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF and ACNDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWPFF vs VIBVY Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, VIBVY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while VIBVY trades at $33.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas VIBVY's P/E ratio is 14.63. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VIBVY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF and VIBVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWPFF vs SVAUF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, SVAUF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while SVAUF trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas SVAUF's P/E ratio is -43.00. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SVAUF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF is less volatile compared to SVAUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWPFF.
SWPFF vs GRMHF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, GRMHF has a market cap of 985.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while GRMHF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas GRMHF's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GRMHF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF is less volatile compared to GRMHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWPFF.
SWPFF vs RLHPF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, RLHPF has a market cap of 962.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while RLHPF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas RLHPF's P/E ratio is 43.14. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RLHPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF and RLHPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWPFF vs HYSNY Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, HYSNY has a market cap of 929.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while HYSNY trades at $3.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas HYSNY's P/E ratio is 362.00. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HYSNY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF and HYSNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWPFF vs MMHTF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, MMHTF has a market cap of 780.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while MMHTF trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas MMHTF's P/E ratio is 8.07. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MMHTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF is less volatile compared to MMHTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWPFF.
SWPFF vs PTLKF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, PTLKF has a market cap of 708.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while PTLKF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas PTLKF's P/E ratio is 0.50. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PTLKF's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF is less volatile compared to PTLKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWPFF.
SWPFF vs SSHLY Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, SSHLY has a market cap of 630.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while SSHLY trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas SSHLY's P/E ratio is -10.32. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SSHLY's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF is less volatile compared to SSHLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWPFF.
SWPFF vs SSHLF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, SSHLF has a market cap of 527M. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while SSHLF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas SSHLF's P/E ratio is -8.62. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SSHLF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF is less volatile compared to SSHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWPFF.
SWPFF vs GBCEY Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, GBCEY has a market cap of 488.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while GBCEY trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas GBCEY's P/E ratio is 17.89. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GBCEY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF and GBCEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWPFF vs KWLGF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, KWLGF has a market cap of 470.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while KWLGF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas KWLGF's P/E ratio is 4.65. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KWLGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF and KWLGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWPFF vs JPPSF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, JPPSF has a market cap of 447.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while JPPSF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas JPPSF's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JPPSF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF and JPPSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWPFF vs LSLPF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, LSLPF has a market cap of 387M. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while LSLPF trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas LSLPF's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LSLPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF is less volatile compared to LSLPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWPFF.
SWPFF vs MDTWF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, MDTWF has a market cap of 323.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while MDTWF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas MDTWF's P/E ratio is 7.41. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MDTWF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF and MDTWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWPFF vs SOHOF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, SOHOF has a market cap of 312M. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while SOHOF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas SOHOF's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SOHOF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF is less volatile compared to SOHOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWPFF.
SWPFF vs SHMSF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, SHMSF has a market cap of 305.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while SHMSF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas SHMSF's P/E ratio is -6.21. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SHMSF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF is less volatile compared to SHMSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWPFF.
SWPFF vs DLMI Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, DLMI has a market cap of 255.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while DLMI trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas DLMI's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DLMI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF is less volatile compared to DLMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWPFF.
SWPFF vs MDPCF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, MDPCF has a market cap of 251.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while MDPCF trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas MDPCF's P/E ratio is 5.89. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MDPCF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF and MDPCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWPFF vs FXTGY Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, FXTGY has a market cap of 249.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while FXTGY trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas FXTGY's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FXTGY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF and FXTGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWPFF vs NTPIF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, NTPIF has a market cap of 239M. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while NTPIF trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas NTPIF's P/E ratio is 3.01. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NTPIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF is less volatile compared to NTPIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWPFF.
SWPFF vs SDWHF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, SDWHF has a market cap of 195.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while SDWHF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas SDWHF's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SDWHF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF and SDWHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWPFF vs RNHEF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, RNHEF has a market cap of 187.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while RNHEF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas RNHEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RNHEF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF is less volatile compared to RNHEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWPFF.
SWPFF vs FCRIF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, FCRIF has a market cap of 176.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while FCRIF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas FCRIF's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FCRIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF and FCRIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWPFF vs MRFGF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, MRFGF has a market cap of 152.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while MRFGF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas MRFGF's P/E ratio is -6.48. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MRFGF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF and MRFGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWPFF vs MSGNF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, MSGNF has a market cap of 135.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while MSGNF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas MSGNF's P/E ratio is -1.74. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MSGNF's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF is less volatile compared to MSGNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWPFF.
SWPFF vs TPRP Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, TPRP has a market cap of 126M. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while TPRP trades at $21,000.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas TPRP's P/E ratio is 454.55. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TPRP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF is less volatile compared to TPRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWPFF.
SWPFF vs BREUF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, BREUF has a market cap of 111.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while BREUF trades at $11.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas BREUF's P/E ratio is -18.91. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BREUF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF and BREUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWPFF vs AZLCZ Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, AZLCZ has a market cap of 95.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while AZLCZ trades at $1,045.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas AZLCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AZLCZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF is less volatile compared to AZLCZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWPFF.
SWPFF vs OJOC Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, OJOC has a market cap of 93.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while OJOC trades at $335.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas OJOC's P/E ratio is 41.78. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OJOC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF is less volatile compared to OJOC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWPFF.
SWPFF vs PKTEF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, PKTEF has a market cap of 90.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while PKTEF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas PKTEF's P/E ratio is -41.40. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PKTEF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF and PKTEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWPFF vs MHIVF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, MHIVF has a market cap of 82.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while MHIVF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas MHIVF's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MHIVF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF is less volatile compared to MHIVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWPFF.
SWPFF vs BVERS Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, BVERS has a market cap of 80.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while BVERS trades at $3,250.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas BVERS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BVERS's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF and BVERS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWPFF vs CRSS Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, CRSS has a market cap of 74.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while CRSS trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas CRSS's P/E ratio is -3.54. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CRSS's ROE of +18.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF is less volatile compared to CRSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWPFF.
SWPFF vs CPTP Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, CPTP has a market cap of 69.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while CPTP trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas CPTP's P/E ratio is 30.14. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CPTP's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF is less volatile compared to CPTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWPFF.
SWPFF vs ADPPF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, ADPPF has a market cap of 53.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while ADPPF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas ADPPF's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ADPPF's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF is less volatile compared to ADPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWPFF.
SWPFF vs TNHDF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, TNHDF has a market cap of 39.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while TNHDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas TNHDF's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TNHDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF and TNHDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWPFF vs MDICF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, MDICF has a market cap of 32.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while MDICF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas MDICF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MDICF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF and MDICF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWPFF vs LGYSF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, LGYSF has a market cap of 27.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while LGYSF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas LGYSF's P/E ratio is 2.40. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LGYSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF and LGYSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWPFF vs ABCP Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, ABCP has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while ABCP trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas ABCP's P/E ratio is -5.17. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ABCP's ROE of +1.83%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF and ABCP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWPFF vs ASPZ Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, ASPZ has a market cap of 23.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while ASPZ trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas ASPZ's P/E ratio is -3.20. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ASPZ's ROE of +1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF is less volatile compared to ASPZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWPFF.
SWPFF vs ADHLF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, ADHLF has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while ADHLF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas ADHLF's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ADHLF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF is less volatile compared to ADHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWPFF.
SWPFF vs MNGGF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, MNGGF has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while MNGGF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas MNGGF's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MNGGF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF is less volatile compared to MNGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWPFF.
SWPFF vs DIVVZ Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, DIVVZ has a market cap of 18.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while DIVVZ trades at $404.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas DIVVZ's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DIVVZ's ROE of +15.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF and DIVVZ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWPFF vs BCKMF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, BCKMF has a market cap of 17.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while BCKMF trades at $9.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas BCKMF's P/E ratio is 7.15. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BCKMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF and BCKMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWPFF vs ATTGF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, ATTGF has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while ATTGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas ATTGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ATTGF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF is less volatile compared to ATTGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWPFF.
SWPFF vs MGAG Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, MGAG has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while MGAG trades at $300.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas MGAG's P/E ratio is 48.08. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MGAG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF is less volatile compared to MGAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWPFF.
SWPFF vs PCPDF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, PCPDF has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while PCPDF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas PCPDF's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PCPDF's ROE of +4.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF is less volatile compared to PCPDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWPFF.
SWPFF vs TRPTF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, TRPTF has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while TRPTF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas TRPTF's P/E ratio is -2.29. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TRPTF's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF and TRPTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWPFF vs PRPPF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, PRPPF has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while PRPPF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas PRPPF's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PRPPF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF and PRPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWPFF vs MBHCF Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, MBHCF has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while MBHCF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas MBHCF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MBHCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF and MBHCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SWPFF vs ZDPY Comparison
SWPFF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWPFF stands at 13.4B. In comparison, ZDPY has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SWPFF is priced at $2.32, while ZDPY trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWPFF currently has a P/E ratio of -116.00, whereas ZDPY's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, SWPFF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ZDPY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SWPFF is less volatile compared to ZDPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWPFF.