Swan Defence and Heavy Industries Ltd.
Swan Defence and Heavy Industries Ltd. (SWANDEF.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SWANDEF.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Aerospace & Defense Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SWANDEF.NS | ₹1,870.40 | +4.10% | 98.5B | -135.83 | -₹13.77 | N/A |
| BEL.NS | ₹446.85 | -1.56% | 3.3T | 54.69 | ₹8.17 | +0.54% |
| BEL.BO | ₹446.70 | -1.55% | 3.3T | 54.68 | ₹8.17 | +0.54% |
| HAL.NS | ₹3,876.80 | -1.89% | 2.6T | 29.11 | ₹133.17 | +1.29% |
| HAL.BO | ₹3,874.35 | -1.96% | 2.6T | 29.09 | ₹133.17 | +1.29% |
| MAZDOCK.BO | ₹2,166.35 | -1.95% | 873.9B | 36.31 | ₹59.66 | +0.89% |
| MAZDOCK.NS | ₹2,165.40 | -2.01% | 873.5B | 36.30 | ₹59.66 | +0.89% |
| BDL.NS | ₹1,269.30 | +0.10% | 465.3B | 80.08 | ₹15.85 | +0.41% |
| BDL.BO | ₹1,269.15 | +0.08% | 465.2B | 80.07 | ₹15.85 | +0.41% |
| COCHINSHIP.BO | ₹1,398.95 | -3.46% | 368B | 50.54 | ₹27.68 | +0.70% |
Stock Comparison
SWANDEF.NS vs BEL.NS Comparison March 2026
SWANDEF.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWANDEF.NS stands at 98.5B. In comparison, BEL.NS has a market cap of 3.3T. Regarding current trading prices, SWANDEF.NS is priced at ₹1,870.40, while BEL.NS trades at ₹446.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWANDEF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -135.83, whereas BEL.NS's P/E ratio is 54.69. In terms of profitability, SWANDEF.NS's ROE is -0.39%, compared to BEL.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SWANDEF.NS is more volatile compared to BEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWANDEF.NS.Check BEL.NS's competition here
SWANDEF.NS vs BEL.BO Comparison March 2026
SWANDEF.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWANDEF.NS stands at 98.5B. In comparison, BEL.BO has a market cap of 3.3T. Regarding current trading prices, SWANDEF.NS is priced at ₹1,870.40, while BEL.BO trades at ₹446.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWANDEF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -135.83, whereas BEL.BO's P/E ratio is 54.68. In terms of profitability, SWANDEF.NS's ROE is -0.39%, compared to BEL.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SWANDEF.NS is more volatile compared to BEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWANDEF.NS.Check BEL.BO's competition here
SWANDEF.NS vs HAL.NS Comparison March 2026
SWANDEF.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWANDEF.NS stands at 98.5B. In comparison, HAL.NS has a market cap of 2.6T. Regarding current trading prices, SWANDEF.NS is priced at ₹1,870.40, while HAL.NS trades at ₹3,876.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWANDEF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -135.83, whereas HAL.NS's P/E ratio is 29.11. In terms of profitability, SWANDEF.NS's ROE is -0.39%, compared to HAL.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SWANDEF.NS is more volatile compared to HAL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWANDEF.NS.Check HAL.NS's competition here
SWANDEF.NS vs HAL.BO Comparison March 2026
SWANDEF.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWANDEF.NS stands at 98.5B. In comparison, HAL.BO has a market cap of 2.6T. Regarding current trading prices, SWANDEF.NS is priced at ₹1,870.40, while HAL.BO trades at ₹3,874.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWANDEF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -135.83, whereas HAL.BO's P/E ratio is 29.09. In terms of profitability, SWANDEF.NS's ROE is -0.39%, compared to HAL.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SWANDEF.NS is more volatile compared to HAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWANDEF.NS.Check HAL.BO's competition here
SWANDEF.NS vs MAZDOCK.BO Comparison March 2026
SWANDEF.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWANDEF.NS stands at 98.5B. In comparison, MAZDOCK.BO has a market cap of 873.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SWANDEF.NS is priced at ₹1,870.40, while MAZDOCK.BO trades at ₹2,166.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWANDEF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -135.83, whereas MAZDOCK.BO's P/E ratio is 36.31. In terms of profitability, SWANDEF.NS's ROE is -0.39%, compared to MAZDOCK.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SWANDEF.NS is more volatile compared to MAZDOCK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWANDEF.NS.Check MAZDOCK.BO's competition here
SWANDEF.NS vs MAZDOCK.NS Comparison March 2026
SWANDEF.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWANDEF.NS stands at 98.5B. In comparison, MAZDOCK.NS has a market cap of 873.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SWANDEF.NS is priced at ₹1,870.40, while MAZDOCK.NS trades at ₹2,165.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWANDEF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -135.83, whereas MAZDOCK.NS's P/E ratio is 36.30. In terms of profitability, SWANDEF.NS's ROE is -0.39%, compared to MAZDOCK.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SWANDEF.NS is more volatile compared to MAZDOCK.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWANDEF.NS.Check MAZDOCK.NS's competition here
SWANDEF.NS vs BDL.NS Comparison March 2026
SWANDEF.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWANDEF.NS stands at 98.5B. In comparison, BDL.NS has a market cap of 465.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWANDEF.NS is priced at ₹1,870.40, while BDL.NS trades at ₹1,269.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWANDEF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -135.83, whereas BDL.NS's P/E ratio is 80.08. In terms of profitability, SWANDEF.NS's ROE is -0.39%, compared to BDL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SWANDEF.NS is more volatile compared to BDL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWANDEF.NS.Check BDL.NS's competition here
SWANDEF.NS vs BDL.BO Comparison March 2026
SWANDEF.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWANDEF.NS stands at 98.5B. In comparison, BDL.BO has a market cap of 465.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWANDEF.NS is priced at ₹1,870.40, while BDL.BO trades at ₹1,269.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWANDEF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -135.83, whereas BDL.BO's P/E ratio is 80.07. In terms of profitability, SWANDEF.NS's ROE is -0.39%, compared to BDL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SWANDEF.NS is more volatile compared to BDL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWANDEF.NS.Check BDL.BO's competition here
SWANDEF.NS vs COCHINSHIP.BO Comparison March 2026
SWANDEF.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWANDEF.NS stands at 98.5B. In comparison, COCHINSHIP.BO has a market cap of 368B. Regarding current trading prices, SWANDEF.NS is priced at ₹1,870.40, while COCHINSHIP.BO trades at ₹1,398.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWANDEF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -135.83, whereas COCHINSHIP.BO's P/E ratio is 50.54. In terms of profitability, SWANDEF.NS's ROE is -0.39%, compared to COCHINSHIP.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SWANDEF.NS is more volatile compared to COCHINSHIP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWANDEF.NS.Check COCHINSHIP.BO's competition here
SWANDEF.NS vs COCHINSHIP.NS Comparison March 2026
SWANDEF.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWANDEF.NS stands at 98.5B. In comparison, COCHINSHIP.NS has a market cap of 367.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SWANDEF.NS is priced at ₹1,870.40, while COCHINSHIP.NS trades at ₹1,398.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWANDEF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -135.83, whereas COCHINSHIP.NS's P/E ratio is 50.52. In terms of profitability, SWANDEF.NS's ROE is -0.39%, compared to COCHINSHIP.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SWANDEF.NS is more volatile compared to COCHINSHIP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWANDEF.NS.Check COCHINSHIP.NS's competition here
SWANDEF.NS vs GRSE.NS Comparison March 2026
SWANDEF.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWANDEF.NS stands at 98.5B. In comparison, GRSE.NS has a market cap of 265.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWANDEF.NS is priced at ₹1,870.40, while GRSE.NS trades at ₹2,314.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWANDEF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -135.83, whereas GRSE.NS's P/E ratio is 38.43. In terms of profitability, SWANDEF.NS's ROE is -0.39%, compared to GRSE.NS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SWANDEF.NS is more volatile compared to GRSE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWANDEF.NS.Check GRSE.NS's competition here
SWANDEF.NS vs GRSE.BO Comparison March 2026
SWANDEF.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWANDEF.NS stands at 98.5B. In comparison, GRSE.BO has a market cap of 265B. Regarding current trading prices, SWANDEF.NS is priced at ₹1,870.40, while GRSE.BO trades at ₹2,313.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWANDEF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -135.83, whereas GRSE.BO's P/E ratio is 38.40. In terms of profitability, SWANDEF.NS's ROE is -0.39%, compared to GRSE.BO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SWANDEF.NS is more volatile compared to GRSE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWANDEF.NS.Check GRSE.BO's competition here
SWANDEF.NS vs DATAPATTNS.NS Comparison March 2026
SWANDEF.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWANDEF.NS stands at 98.5B. In comparison, DATAPATTNS.NS has a market cap of 175B. Regarding current trading prices, SWANDEF.NS is priced at ₹1,870.40, while DATAPATTNS.NS trades at ₹3,126.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWANDEF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -135.83, whereas DATAPATTNS.NS's P/E ratio is 70.70. In terms of profitability, SWANDEF.NS's ROE is -0.39%, compared to DATAPATTNS.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SWANDEF.NS is more volatile compared to DATAPATTNS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWANDEF.NS.Check DATAPATTNS.NS's competition here
SWANDEF.NS vs DATAPATTNS.BO Comparison March 2026
SWANDEF.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWANDEF.NS stands at 98.5B. In comparison, DATAPATTNS.BO has a market cap of 174.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SWANDEF.NS is priced at ₹1,870.40, while DATAPATTNS.BO trades at ₹3,123.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWANDEF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -135.83, whereas DATAPATTNS.BO's P/E ratio is 70.62. In terms of profitability, SWANDEF.NS's ROE is -0.39%, compared to DATAPATTNS.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SWANDEF.NS is more volatile compared to DATAPATTNS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWANDEF.NS.Check DATAPATTNS.BO's competition here
SWANDEF.NS vs ZENTEC.NS Comparison March 2026
SWANDEF.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWANDEF.NS stands at 98.5B. In comparison, ZENTEC.NS has a market cap of 126.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SWANDEF.NS is priced at ₹1,870.40, while ZENTEC.NS trades at ₹1,406.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWANDEF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -135.83, whereas ZENTEC.NS's P/E ratio is 47.95. In terms of profitability, SWANDEF.NS's ROE is -0.39%, compared to ZENTEC.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SWANDEF.NS is more volatile compared to ZENTEC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWANDEF.NS.Check ZENTEC.NS's competition here
SWANDEF.NS vs ZENTEC.BO Comparison March 2026
SWANDEF.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWANDEF.NS stands at 98.5B. In comparison, ZENTEC.BO has a market cap of 126.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SWANDEF.NS is priced at ₹1,870.40, while ZENTEC.BO trades at ₹1,405.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWANDEF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -135.83, whereas ZENTEC.BO's P/E ratio is 47.92. In terms of profitability, SWANDEF.NS's ROE is -0.39%, compared to ZENTEC.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SWANDEF.NS is more volatile compared to ZENTEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWANDEF.NS.Check ZENTEC.BO's competition here
SWANDEF.NS vs APOLLO.BO Comparison March 2026
SWANDEF.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWANDEF.NS stands at 98.5B. In comparison, APOLLO.BO has a market cap of 79.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SWANDEF.NS is priced at ₹1,870.40, while APOLLO.BO trades at ₹212.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWANDEF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -135.83, whereas APOLLO.BO's P/E ratio is 83.18. In terms of profitability, SWANDEF.NS's ROE is -0.39%, compared to APOLLO.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SWANDEF.NS is more volatile compared to APOLLO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWANDEF.NS.Check APOLLO.BO's competition here
SWANDEF.NS vs APOLLO.NS Comparison March 2026
SWANDEF.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWANDEF.NS stands at 98.5B. In comparison, APOLLO.NS has a market cap of 75.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWANDEF.NS is priced at ₹1,870.40, while APOLLO.NS trades at ₹212.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWANDEF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -135.83, whereas APOLLO.NS's P/E ratio is 83.15. In terms of profitability, SWANDEF.NS's ROE is -0.39%, compared to APOLLO.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SWANDEF.NS is more volatile compared to APOLLO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWANDEF.NS.Check APOLLO.NS's competition here
SWANDEF.NS vs PARAS.NS Comparison March 2026
SWANDEF.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWANDEF.NS stands at 98.5B. In comparison, PARAS.NS has a market cap of 58.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWANDEF.NS is priced at ₹1,870.40, while PARAS.NS trades at ₹721.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWANDEF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -135.83, whereas PARAS.NS's P/E ratio is 79.06. In terms of profitability, SWANDEF.NS's ROE is -0.39%, compared to PARAS.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SWANDEF.NS is more volatile compared to PARAS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWANDEF.NS.Check PARAS.NS's competition here
SWANDEF.NS vs PARAS.BO Comparison March 2026
SWANDEF.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWANDEF.NS stands at 98.5B. In comparison, PARAS.BO has a market cap of 58B. Regarding current trading prices, SWANDEF.NS is priced at ₹1,870.40, while PARAS.BO trades at ₹719.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWANDEF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -135.83, whereas PARAS.BO's P/E ratio is 78.84. In terms of profitability, SWANDEF.NS's ROE is -0.39%, compared to PARAS.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SWANDEF.NS is more volatile compared to PARAS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWANDEF.NS.Check PARAS.BO's competition here
SWANDEF.NS vs UNIMECH.NS Comparison March 2026
SWANDEF.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWANDEF.NS stands at 98.5B. In comparison, UNIMECH.NS has a market cap of 43.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWANDEF.NS is priced at ₹1,870.40, while UNIMECH.NS trades at ₹848.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWANDEF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -135.83, whereas UNIMECH.NS's P/E ratio is 64.41. In terms of profitability, SWANDEF.NS's ROE is -0.39%, compared to UNIMECH.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SWANDEF.NS is more volatile compared to UNIMECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWANDEF.NS.Check UNIMECH.NS's competition here
SWANDEF.NS vs RNAVAL.NS Comparison March 2026
SWANDEF.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWANDEF.NS stands at 98.5B. In comparison, RNAVAL.NS has a market cap of 33.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWANDEF.NS is priced at ₹1,870.40, while RNAVAL.NS trades at ₹632.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWANDEF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -135.83, whereas RNAVAL.NS's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, SWANDEF.NS's ROE is -0.39%, compared to RNAVAL.NS's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SWANDEF.NS is less volatile compared to RNAVAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWANDEF.NS.Check RNAVAL.NS's competition here
SWANDEF.NS vs ROSSTECH.NS Comparison March 2026
SWANDEF.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWANDEF.NS stands at 98.5B. In comparison, ROSSTECH.NS has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWANDEF.NS is priced at ₹1,870.40, while ROSSTECH.NS trades at ₹691.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWANDEF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -135.83, whereas ROSSTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 122.62. In terms of profitability, SWANDEF.NS's ROE is -0.39%, compared to ROSSTECH.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SWANDEF.NS is more volatile compared to ROSSTECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWANDEF.NS.Check ROSSTECH.NS's competition here
SWANDEF.NS vs SIKA.BO Comparison March 2026
SWANDEF.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWANDEF.NS stands at 98.5B. In comparison, SIKA.BO has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWANDEF.NS is priced at ₹1,870.40, while SIKA.BO trades at ₹946.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWANDEF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -135.83, whereas SIKA.BO's P/E ratio is 55.01. In terms of profitability, SWANDEF.NS's ROE is -0.39%, compared to SIKA.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SWANDEF.NS is more volatile compared to SIKA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWANDEF.NS.Check SIKA.BO's competition here
SWANDEF.NS vs DCXINDIA.BO Comparison March 2026
SWANDEF.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWANDEF.NS stands at 98.5B. In comparison, DCXINDIA.BO has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, SWANDEF.NS is priced at ₹1,870.40, while DCXINDIA.BO trades at ₹170.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWANDEF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -135.83, whereas DCXINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 143.53. In terms of profitability, SWANDEF.NS's ROE is -0.39%, compared to DCXINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SWANDEF.NS is more volatile compared to DCXINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWANDEF.NS.Check DCXINDIA.BO's competition here
SWANDEF.NS vs DCXINDIA.NS Comparison March 2026
SWANDEF.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWANDEF.NS stands at 98.5B. In comparison, DCXINDIA.NS has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, SWANDEF.NS is priced at ₹1,870.40, while DCXINDIA.NS trades at ₹170.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWANDEF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -135.83, whereas DCXINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 143.43. In terms of profitability, SWANDEF.NS's ROE is -0.39%, compared to DCXINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SWANDEF.NS is more volatile compared to DCXINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWANDEF.NS.Check DCXINDIA.NS's competition here
SWANDEF.NS vs PREMEXPLQ.BO Comparison March 2026
SWANDEF.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWANDEF.NS stands at 98.5B. In comparison, PREMEXPLQ.BO has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SWANDEF.NS is priced at ₹1,870.40, while PREMEXPLQ.BO trades at ₹1,559.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWANDEF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -135.83, whereas PREMEXPLQ.BO's P/E ratio is -125.59. In terms of profitability, SWANDEF.NS's ROE is -0.39%, compared to PREMEXPLQ.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SWANDEF.NS is more volatile compared to PREMEXPLQ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWANDEF.NS.Check PREMEXPLQ.BO's competition here
SWANDEF.NS vs KRISHNADEF.NS Comparison March 2026
SWANDEF.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWANDEF.NS stands at 98.5B. In comparison, KRISHNADEF.NS has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SWANDEF.NS is priced at ₹1,870.40, while KRISHNADEF.NS trades at ₹1,100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWANDEF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -135.83, whereas KRISHNADEF.NS's P/E ratio is 53.58. In terms of profitability, SWANDEF.NS's ROE is -0.39%, compared to KRISHNADEF.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SWANDEF.NS is more volatile compared to KRISHNADEF.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWANDEF.NS.Check KRISHNADEF.NS's competition here
SWANDEF.NS vs TANAA.BO Comparison March 2026
SWANDEF.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWANDEF.NS stands at 98.5B. In comparison, TANAA.BO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWANDEF.NS is priced at ₹1,870.40, while TANAA.BO trades at ₹245.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWANDEF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -135.83, whereas TANAA.BO's P/E ratio is 35.10. In terms of profitability, SWANDEF.NS's ROE is -0.39%, compared to TANAA.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SWANDEF.NS is more volatile compared to TANAA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWANDEF.NS.Check TANAA.BO's competition here
SWANDEF.NS vs DRONACHRYA.BO Comparison March 2026
SWANDEF.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWANDEF.NS stands at 98.5B. In comparison, DRONACHRYA.BO has a market cap of 733.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SWANDEF.NS is priced at ₹1,870.40, while DRONACHRYA.BO trades at ₹30.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWANDEF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -135.83, whereas DRONACHRYA.BO's P/E ratio is -5.63. In terms of profitability, SWANDEF.NS's ROE is -0.39%, compared to DRONACHRYA.BO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SWANDEF.NS is more volatile compared to DRONACHRYA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWANDEF.NS.Check DRONACHRYA.BO's competition here
SWANDEF.NS vs KRISHNADEF-SM.NS Comparison March 2026
SWANDEF.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWANDEF.NS stands at 98.5B. In comparison, KRISHNADEF-SM.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SWANDEF.NS is priced at ₹1,870.40, while KRISHNADEF-SM.NS trades at ₹834.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWANDEF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -135.83, whereas KRISHNADEF-SM.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWANDEF.NS's ROE is -0.39%, compared to KRISHNADEF-SM.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SWANDEF.NS is more volatile compared to KRISHNADEF-SM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWANDEF.NS.Check KRISHNADEF-SM.NS's competition here