Sunwin Stevia International, Inc.
Sunwin Stevia International, Inc. SUWN Peers
See (SUWN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Farm Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUWN | $0.00 | N/A | 20K | -0.00 | -$0.10 | N/A |
| WLMIF | $2.40 | +1.69% | 15B | 12.63 | $0.19 | +5.12% |
| WLMIY | $23.50 | -0.01% | 14.7B | 12.56 | $1.87 | +5.21% |
| MHGVY | $19.09 | -0.22% | 9.9B | 26.15 | $0.73 | +3.39% |
| MNHVF | $18.40 | -0.22% | 9.5B | 25.21 | $0.73 | +3.47% |
| HLKKF | $0.02 | +14900.00% | 7.4B | -0.21 | -$0.07 | N/A |
| SALRF | $54.04 | +17.48% | 7.2B | 40.33 | $1.34 | N/A |
| KLKBF | $6.17 | N/A | 6.9B | 11.43 | $0.54 | +1.11% |
| KLKBY | $5.32 | +24.15% | 6.5B | 35.47 | $0.15 | +0.59% |
| PPOKF | $0.39 | +15.59% | 6.4B | 39.30 | $0.01 | +0.00% |
Stock Comparison
SUWN vs WLMIF Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, WLMIF has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while WLMIF trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas WLMIF's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WLMIF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN and WLMIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SUWN vs WLMIY Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, WLMIY has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while WLMIY trades at $23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas WLMIY's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WLMIY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN is less volatile compared to WLMIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUWN.
SUWN vs MHGVY Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, MHGVY has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while MHGVY trades at $19.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MHGVY's P/E ratio is 26.15. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MHGVY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN is less volatile compared to MHGVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUWN.
SUWN vs MNHVF Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, MNHVF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while MNHVF trades at $18.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MNHVF's P/E ratio is 25.21. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MNHVF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN and MNHVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SUWN vs HLKKF Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, HLKKF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while HLKKF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas HLKKF's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HLKKF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN and HLKKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SUWN vs SALRF Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, SALRF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while SALRF trades at $54.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SALRF's P/E ratio is 40.33. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SALRF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN is less volatile compared to SALRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUWN.
SUWN vs KLKBF Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, KLKBF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while KLKBF trades at $6.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas KLKBF's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KLKBF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN and KLKBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SUWN vs KLKBY Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, KLKBY has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while KLKBY trades at $5.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas KLKBY's P/E ratio is 35.47. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KLKBY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN and KLKBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SUWN vs PPOKF Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, PPOKF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while PPOKF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PPOKF's P/E ratio is 39.30. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PPOKF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN and PPOKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SUWN vs CHPFF Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, CHPFF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while CHPFF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CHPFF's P/E ratio is 7.84. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CHPFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN and CHPFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SUWN vs SALRY Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, SALRY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while SALRY trades at $11.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SALRY's P/E ratio is 33.35. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SALRY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN is less volatile compared to SALRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUWN.
SUWN vs CPOUF Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, CPOUF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while CPOUF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CPOUF's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CPOUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN and CPOUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SUWN vs AAYYY Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, AAYYY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while AAYYY trades at $9.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AAYYY's P/E ratio is -931.00. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AAYYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN is less volatile compared to AAYYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUWN.
SUWN vs ACOPY Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, ACOPY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while ACOPY trades at $5.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ACOPY's P/E ratio is 36.96. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ACOPY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN and ACOPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SUWN vs BKFKF Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, BKFKF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while BKFKF trades at $45.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BKFKF's P/E ratio is 70.56. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BKFKF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN and BKFKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SUWN vs GARPF Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, GARPF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while GARPF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GARPF's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GARPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN is less volatile compared to GARPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUWN.
SUWN vs IDBHF Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, IDBHF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while IDBHF trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas IDBHF's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IDBHF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN is less volatile compared to IDBHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUWN.
SUWN vs KNKZF Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, KNKZF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while KNKZF trades at $60.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas KNKZF's P/E ratio is 10.85. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KNKZF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN and KNKZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SUWN vs ASTVF Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, ASTVF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while ASTVF trades at $9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ASTVF's P/E ratio is 8.02. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ASTVF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN and ASTVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SUWN vs SLCJY Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, SLCJY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while SLCJY trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SLCJY's P/E ratio is 11.66. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SLCJY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN is less volatile compared to SLCJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUWN.
SUWN vs PTABF Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, PTABF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while PTABF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PTABF's P/E ratio is 18.88. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PTABF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN is less volatile compared to PTABF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUWN.
SUWN vs DNDPF Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, DNDPF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while DNDPF trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas DNDPF's P/E ratio is -35.89. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DNDPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN and DNDPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SUWN vs UPBMF Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, UPBMF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while UPBMF trades at $2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas UPBMF's P/E ratio is 8.04. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UPBMF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN and UPBMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SUWN vs CTTQF Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, CTTQF has a market cap of 985.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while CTTQF trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CTTQF's P/E ratio is 70.67. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CTTQF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN and CTTQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SUWN vs GRCLF Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, GRCLF has a market cap of 880.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while GRCLF trades at $3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GRCLF's P/E ratio is 18.86. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GRCLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN and GRCLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SUWN vs MRVSY Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, MRVSY has a market cap of 862.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while MRVSY trades at $5.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MRVSY's P/E ratio is -3.99. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MRVSY's ROE of -16.89%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN and MRVSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SUWN vs AAGRY Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, AAGRY has a market cap of 769.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while AAGRY trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AAGRY's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AAGRY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN and AAGRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SUWN vs EDESY Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, EDESY has a market cap of 722.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while EDESY trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas EDESY's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EDESY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN and EDESY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SUWN vs PPLFF Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, PPLFF has a market cap of 613.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while PPLFF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PPLFF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PPLFF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN is less volatile compared to PPLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUWN.
SUWN vs ASAGF Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, ASAGF has a market cap of 566.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while ASAGF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ASAGF's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ASAGF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN and ASAGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SUWN vs SISAF Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, SISAF has a market cap of 562.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while SISAF trades at $54.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SISAF's P/E ratio is 4.93. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SISAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN and SISAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SUWN vs MHPSY Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, MHPSY has a market cap of 535.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while MHPSY trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MHPSY's P/E ratio is 3.60. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MHPSY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN and MHPSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SUWN vs PPLFY Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, PPLFY has a market cap of 484.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while PPLFY trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PPLFY's P/E ratio is 4.93. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PPLFY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN and PPLFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SUWN vs GRGSF Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, GRGSF has a market cap of 460.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while GRGSF trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GRGSF's P/E ratio is 1.88. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GRGSF's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN and GRGSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SUWN vs ORENF Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, ORENF has a market cap of 458.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while ORENF trades at $4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ORENF's P/E ratio is 7.54. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ORENF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN and ORENF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SUWN vs ALFDF Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, ALFDF has a market cap of 449.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while ALFDF trades at $11.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ALFDF's P/E ratio is 14.81. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ALFDF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN is less volatile compared to ALFDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUWN.
SUWN vs BRCPF Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, BRCPF has a market cap of 441.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while BRCPF trades at $4.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BRCPF's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BRCPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN and BRCPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SUWN vs SLMCF Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, SLMCF has a market cap of 429.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while SLMCF trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SLMCF's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SLMCF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN and SLMCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SUWN vs SLCJF Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, SLCJF has a market cap of 382.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while SLCJF trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SLCJF's P/E ratio is 8.80. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SLCJF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN is less volatile compared to SLCJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUWN.
SUWN vs AEPLF Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, AEPLF has a market cap of 360.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while AEPLF trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AEPLF's P/E ratio is 5.35. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEPLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN and AEPLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SUWN vs UVPOF Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, UVPOF has a market cap of 297.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while UVPOF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas UVPOF's P/E ratio is 7.92. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UVPOF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN is less volatile compared to UVPOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUWN.
SUWN vs PRCF Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, PRCF has a market cap of 240.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while PRCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PRCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN is less volatile compared to PRCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUWN.
SUWN vs SARDY Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, SARDY has a market cap of 228.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while SARDY trades at $12.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SARDY's P/E ratio is 24.40. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SARDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN and SARDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SUWN vs SARDF Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, SARDF has a market cap of 224.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while SARDF trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SARDF's P/E ratio is 18.46. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SARDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN is less volatile compared to SARDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUWN.
SUWN vs STNT Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, STNT has a market cap of 178.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while STNT trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas STNT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STNT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN and STNT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SUWN vs DDEJF Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, DDEJF has a market cap of 169.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while DDEJF trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas DDEJF's P/E ratio is 3.27. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DDEJF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN is less volatile compared to DDEJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUWN.
SUWN vs DNDEF Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, DNDEF has a market cap of 79.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while DNDEF trades at $15.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas DNDEF's P/E ratio is -38.66. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DNDEF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN is less volatile compared to DNDEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUWN.
SUWN vs CTUNF Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, CTUNF has a market cap of 62.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while CTUNF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CTUNF's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CTUNF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN is less volatile compared to CTUNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUWN.
SUWN vs NNUTU Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, NNUTU has a market cap of 41.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while NNUTU trades at $3,750.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NNUTU's P/E ratio is 28.31. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NNUTU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN and NNUTU have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SUWN vs AASZF Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, AASZF has a market cap of 32.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while AASZF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AASZF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AASZF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN and AASZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SUWN vs GARPY Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, GARPY has a market cap of 25.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while GARPY trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GARPY's P/E ratio is 6.97. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GARPY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN is less volatile compared to GARPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUWN.
SUWN vs CLAD Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, CLAD has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while CLAD trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CLAD's P/E ratio is -33.67. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CLAD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN is less volatile compared to CLAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUWN.
SUWN vs GLGLF Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, GLGLF has a market cap of 11.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while GLGLF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GLGLF's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLGLF's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN and GLGLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SUWN vs CMGHY Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, CMGHY has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while CMGHY trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CMGHY's P/E ratio is -8.84. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CMGHY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN is less volatile compared to CMGHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUWN.
SUWN vs OPTHF Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, OPTHF has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while OPTHF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas OPTHF's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OPTHF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN is less volatile compared to OPTHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUWN.
SUWN vs SPZI Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, SPZI has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while SPZI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SPZI's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPZI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN is less volatile compared to SPZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUWN.
SUWN vs PEASF Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, PEASF has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while PEASF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PEASF's P/E ratio is -1.56. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PEASF's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN and PEASF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SUWN vs HERB Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, HERB has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while HERB trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas HERB's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HERB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN and HERB have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SUWN vs IGPFF Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, IGPFF has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while IGPFF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas IGPFF's P/E ratio is 35.35. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGPFF's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN is less volatile compared to IGPFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUWN.
SUWN vs GCEH Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, GCEH has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while GCEH trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GCEH's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GCEH's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN is less volatile compared to GCEH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUWN.
SUWN vs CMGHF Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, CMGHF has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while CMGHF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CMGHF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CMGHF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN and CMGHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SUWN vs GSFD Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, GSFD has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while GSFD trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GSFD's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GSFD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN and GSFD have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SUWN vs RSSFF Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, RSSFF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while RSSFF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas RSSFF's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RSSFF's ROE of -15.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN and RSSFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SUWN vs MINE Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, MINE has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while MINE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MINE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MINE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN is less volatile compared to MINE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUWN.
SUWN vs STEV Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, STEV has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while STEV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas STEV's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STEV's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN is less volatile compared to STEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUWN.
SUWN vs PNDHF Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, PNDHF has a market cap of 855.9K. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while PNDHF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PNDHF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PNDHF's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN and PNDHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SUWN vs FLAF Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, FLAF has a market cap of 460.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while FLAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FLAF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLAF's ROE of -4.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN and FLAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SUWN vs CFPI Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, CFPI has a market cap of 285.7K. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while CFPI trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CFPI's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CFPI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN is less volatile compared to CFPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUWN.
SUWN vs SHMP Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, SHMP has a market cap of 247.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while SHMP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SHMP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SHMP's ROE of +1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN is less volatile compared to SHMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUWN.
SUWN vs MSRM Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, MSRM has a market cap of 218.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while MSRM trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MSRM's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MSRM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN and MSRM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SUWN vs HERF Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, HERF has a market cap of 201.9K. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while HERF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas HERF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HERF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN and HERF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SUWN vs MSAH Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, MSAH has a market cap of 144.7K. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while MSAH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MSAH's P/E ratio is 0.15. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MSAH's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN and MSAH have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SUWN vs CHYI Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, CHYI has a market cap of 66.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while CHYI trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CHYI's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CHYI's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN and CHYI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SUWN vs OGAA Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, OGAA has a market cap of 46.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while OGAA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas OGAA's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OGAA's ROE of -2.82%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN and OGAA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SUWN vs URBF Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, URBF has a market cap of 25K. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while URBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas URBF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to URBF's ROE of -56.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN is less volatile compared to URBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUWN.
SUWN vs SIAF Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, SIAF has a market cap of 18.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while SIAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SIAF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SIAF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN and SIAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SUWN vs FFRMF Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, FFRMF has a market cap of 17.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while FFRMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FFRMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FFRMF's ROE of -2.83%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN is less volatile compared to FFRMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUWN.
SUWN vs URYL Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, URYL has a market cap of 15.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while URYL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas URYL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to URYL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN and URYL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SUWN vs BIQIF Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, BIQIF has a market cap of 10K. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while BIQIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BIQIF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BIQIF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN is less volatile compared to BIQIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUWN.
SUWN vs TAER Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, TAER has a market cap of 5.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while TAER trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TAER's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TAER's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN and TAER have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SUWN vs KALRQ Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, KALRQ has a market cap of 184. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while KALRQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas KALRQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KALRQ's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN and KALRQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SUWN vs TSLLF Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, TSLLF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while TSLLF trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TSLLF's P/E ratio is 19.15. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TSLLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN and TSLLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SUWN vs OCESP Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, OCESP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while OCESP trades at $16.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas OCESP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OCESP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN and OCESP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SUWN vs BYIN Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, BYIN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while BYIN trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BYIN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BYIN's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN and BYIN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SUWN vs CAOX Comparison
SUWN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUWN stands at 20K. In comparison, CAOX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SUWN is priced at $0.00, while CAOX trades at $601.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUWN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CAOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUWN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CAOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUWN and CAOX have similar daily volatility (0.00).