Sun Art Retail Group Limited
Sun Art Retail Group Limited (SURRF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SURRF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Department Stores Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SURRF | $0.25 | +0.00% | 2.4B | 25.00 | $0.01 | +13.01% |
| AONNF | $12.01 | +0.08% | 33.2B | 171.57 | $0.07 | +1.43% |
| SVTMF | $11.00 | +0.00% | 13.4B | 9.17 | $1.20 | +2.12% |
| RYKKY | $11.30 | +8.03% | 12B | 37.67 | $0.30 | +0.24% |
| SMKUY | $1.00 | +0.00% | 10.6B | 50.00 | $0.02 | +45.63% |
| AONNY | $11.81 | +1.03% | 10.2B | 168.71 | $0.07 | +0.38% |
| MAKSF | $4.63 | +0.00% | 9.4B | 463.00 | $0.01 | +1.10% |
| SRGHY | $16.53 | +4.16% | 9.1B | 20.11 | $0.82 | +2.08% |
| MAKSY | $8.85 | +2.19% | 9B | 442.50 | $0.02 | +1.16% |
| SRHGF | $14.72 | +0.00% | 8B | 17.95 | $0.82 | +2.92% |
Stock Comparison
SURRF vs AONNF Comparison March 2026
SURRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURRF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, AONNF has a market cap of 33.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SURRF is priced at $0.25, while AONNF trades at $12.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURRF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas AONNF's P/E ratio is 171.57. In terms of profitability, SURRF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AONNF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SURRF and AONNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AONNF's competition here
SURRF vs SVTMF Comparison March 2026
SURRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURRF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SVTMF has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SURRF is priced at $0.25, while SVTMF trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURRF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas SVTMF's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, SURRF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SVTMF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SURRF and SVTMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SVTMF's competition here
SURRF vs RYKKY Comparison March 2026
SURRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURRF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, RYKKY has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, SURRF is priced at $0.25, while RYKKY trades at $11.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURRF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas RYKKY's P/E ratio is 37.67. In terms of profitability, SURRF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RYKKY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SURRF is less volatile compared to RYKKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SURRF.Check RYKKY's competition here
SURRF vs SMKUY Comparison March 2026
SURRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURRF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SMKUY has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SURRF is priced at $0.25, while SMKUY trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURRF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas SMKUY's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, SURRF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SMKUY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SURRF is less volatile compared to SMKUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SURRF.Check SMKUY's competition here
SURRF vs AONNY Comparison March 2026
SURRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURRF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, AONNY has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SURRF is priced at $0.25, while AONNY trades at $11.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURRF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas AONNY's P/E ratio is 168.71. In terms of profitability, SURRF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AONNY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SURRF is less volatile compared to AONNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SURRF.Check AONNY's competition here
SURRF vs MAKSF Comparison March 2026
SURRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURRF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, MAKSF has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SURRF is priced at $0.25, while MAKSF trades at $4.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURRF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas MAKSF's P/E ratio is 463.00. In terms of profitability, SURRF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MAKSF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SURRF and MAKSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MAKSF's competition here
SURRF vs SRGHY Comparison March 2026
SURRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURRF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SRGHY has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SURRF is priced at $0.25, while SRGHY trades at $16.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURRF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas SRGHY's P/E ratio is 20.11. In terms of profitability, SURRF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SRGHY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SURRF is less volatile compared to SRGHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SURRF.Check SRGHY's competition here
SURRF vs MAKSY Comparison March 2026
SURRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURRF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, MAKSY has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, SURRF is priced at $0.25, while MAKSY trades at $8.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURRF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas MAKSY's P/E ratio is 442.50. In terms of profitability, SURRF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MAKSY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SURRF is less volatile compared to MAKSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SURRF.Check MAKSY's competition here
SURRF vs SRHGF Comparison March 2026
SURRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURRF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SRHGF has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, SURRF is priced at $0.25, while SRHGF trades at $14.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURRF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas SRHGF's P/E ratio is 17.95. In terms of profitability, SURRF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SRHGF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SURRF and SRHGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SRHGF's competition here
SURRF vs IMHDF Comparison March 2026
SURRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURRF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, IMHDF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SURRF is priced at $0.25, while IMHDF trades at $21.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURRF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas IMHDF's P/E ratio is 21.96. In terms of profitability, SURRF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IMHDF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SURRF and IMHDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IMHDF's competition here
SURRF vs TOKUF Comparison March 2026
SURRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURRF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, TOKUF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SURRF is priced at $0.25, while TOKUF trades at $12.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURRF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas TOKUF's P/E ratio is 12.68. In terms of profitability, SURRF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TOKUF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SURRF and TOKUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TOKUF's competition here
SURRF vs TOKUY Comparison March 2026
SURRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURRF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, TOKUY has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SURRF is priced at $0.25, while TOKUY trades at $11.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURRF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas TOKUY's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, SURRF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TOKUY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SURRF and TOKUY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TOKUY's competition here
SURRF vs RYKKF Comparison March 2026
SURRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURRF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, RYKKF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SURRF is priced at $0.25, while RYKKF trades at $20.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURRF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas RYKKF's P/E ratio is 33.38. In terms of profitability, SURRF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RYKKF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SURRF and RYKKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RYKKF's competition here
SURRF vs TKSHF Comparison March 2026
SURRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURRF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, TKSHF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SURRF is priced at $0.25, while TKSHF trades at $17.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURRF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas TKSHF's P/E ratio is 37.83. In terms of profitability, SURRF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TKSHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SURRF is less volatile compared to TKSHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SURRF.Check TKSHF's competition here
SURRF vs WLWHF Comparison March 2026
SURRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURRF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, WLWHF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SURRF is priced at $0.25, while WLWHF trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURRF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas WLWHF's P/E ratio is 18.20. In terms of profitability, SURRF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WLWHF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SURRF and WLWHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WLWHF's competition here
SURRF vs JFROF Comparison March 2026
SURRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURRF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, JFROF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SURRF is priced at $0.25, while JFROF trades at $14.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURRF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas JFROF's P/E ratio is 19.03. In terms of profitability, SURRF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JFROF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SURRF and JFROF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JFROF's competition here
SURRF vs LRENY Comparison March 2026
SURRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURRF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, LRENY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SURRF is priced at $0.25, while LRENY trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURRF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas LRENY's P/E ratio is 15.55. In terms of profitability, SURRF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LRENY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SURRF is less volatile compared to LRENY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SURRF.Check LRENY's competition here
SURRF vs WLWHY Comparison March 2026
SURRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURRF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, WLWHY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SURRF is priced at $0.25, while WLWHY trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURRF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas WLWHY's P/E ratio is 30.45. In terms of profitability, SURRF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WLWHY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SURRF and WLWHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WLWHY's competition here
SURRF vs INREF Comparison March 2026
SURRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURRF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, INREF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SURRF is priced at $0.25, while INREF trades at $26.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURRF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas INREF's P/E ratio is 10.36. In terms of profitability, SURRF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to INREF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SURRF is less volatile compared to INREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SURRF.Check INREF's competition here
SURRF vs SURRY Comparison March 2026
SURRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURRF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SURRY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SURRF is priced at $0.25, while SURRY trades at $1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURRF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas SURRY's P/E ratio is 96.50. In terms of profitability, SURRF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SURRY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SURRF and SURRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SURRY's competition here
SURRF vs PGCMF Comparison March 2026
SURRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURRF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, PGCMF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SURRF is priced at $0.25, while PGCMF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURRF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas PGCMF's P/E ratio is 11.18. In terms of profitability, SURRF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PGCMF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SURRF and PGCMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PGCMF's competition here
SURRF vs GDNEF Comparison March 2026
SURRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURRF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, GDNEF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SURRF is priced at $0.25, while GDNEF trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURRF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas GDNEF's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, SURRF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GDNEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SURRF is less volatile compared to GDNEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SURRF.Check GDNEF's competition here
SURRF vs PPASF Comparison March 2026
SURRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURRF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, PPASF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SURRF is priced at $0.25, while PPASF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURRF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas PPASF's P/E ratio is 155.00. In terms of profitability, SURRF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PPASF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SURRF is less volatile compared to PPASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SURRF.Check PPASF's competition here
SURRF vs PKPYY Comparison March 2026
SURRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURRF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, PKPYY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SURRF is priced at $0.25, while PKPYY trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURRF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas PKPYY's P/E ratio is -62.50. In terms of profitability, SURRF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PKPYY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SURRF and PKPYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PKPYY's competition here
SURRF vs PMDKY Comparison March 2026
SURRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURRF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, PMDKY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SURRF is priced at $0.25, while PMDKY trades at $13.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURRF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas PMDKY's P/E ratio is 9.89. In terms of profitability, SURRF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PMDKY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SURRF and PMDKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PMDKY's competition here
SURRF vs LENTY Comparison March 2026
SURRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURRF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, LENTY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SURRF is priced at $0.25, while LENTY trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURRF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas LENTY's P/E ratio is 4.18. In terms of profitability, SURRF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LENTY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SURRF and LENTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LENTY's competition here
SURRF vs LCMRF Comparison March 2026
SURRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURRF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, LCMRF has a market cap of 861.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SURRF is priced at $0.25, while LCMRF trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURRF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas LCMRF's P/E ratio is 22.93. In terms of profitability, SURRF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LCMRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SURRF and LCMRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LCMRF's competition here
SURRF vs PMDKF Comparison March 2026
SURRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURRF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, PMDKF has a market cap of 830M. Regarding current trading prices, SURRF is priced at $0.25, while PMDKF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURRF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas PMDKF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, SURRF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PMDKF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SURRF and PMDKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PMDKF's competition here
SURRF vs RRETY Comparison March 2026
SURRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURRF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, RRETY has a market cap of 677.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SURRF is priced at $0.25, while RRETY trades at $6.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURRF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas RRETY's P/E ratio is 8.95. In terms of profitability, SURRF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RRETY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SURRF and RRETY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RRETY's competition here
SURRF vs CBDBY Comparison March 2026
SURRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURRF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CBDBY has a market cap of 325.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SURRF is priced at $0.25, while CBDBY trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURRF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas CBDBY's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, SURRF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CBDBY's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SURRF is less volatile compared to CBDBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SURRF.Check CBDBY's competition here
SURRF vs WHGPF Comparison March 2026
SURRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURRF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, WHGPF has a market cap of 213.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SURRF is priced at $0.25, while WHGPF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURRF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas WHGPF's P/E ratio is -30.83. In terms of profitability, SURRF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WHGPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SURRF and WHGPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WHGPF's competition here
SURRF vs HDVTY Comparison March 2026
SURRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURRF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, HDVTY has a market cap of 98.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SURRF is priced at $0.25, while HDVTY trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURRF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas HDVTY's P/E ratio is -16.21. In terms of profitability, SURRF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HDVTY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SURRF and HDVTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HDVTY's competition here
SURRF vs LHUAF Comparison March 2026
SURRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURRF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, LHUAF has a market cap of 85.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SURRF is priced at $0.25, while LHUAF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURRF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas LHUAF's P/E ratio is 0.33. In terms of profitability, SURRF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LHUAF's ROE of +3.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SURRF and LHUAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LHUAF's competition here
SURRF vs NWRLY Comparison March 2026
SURRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURRF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, NWRLY has a market cap of 61.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SURRF is priced at $0.25, while NWRLY trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURRF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas NWRLY's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, SURRF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NWRLY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SURRF and NWRLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NWRLY's competition here
SURRF vs PKSGY Comparison March 2026
SURRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURRF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, PKSGY has a market cap of 43.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SURRF is priced at $0.25, while PKSGY trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURRF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas PKSGY's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, SURRF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PKSGY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SURRF and PKSGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PKSGY's competition here
SURRF vs VEST Comparison March 2026
SURRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURRF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, VEST has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, SURRF is priced at $0.25, while VEST trades at $11.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURRF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas VEST's P/E ratio is -167.27. In terms of profitability, SURRF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VEST's ROE of +1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SURRF and VEST have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VEST's competition here
SURRF vs SRSCQ Comparison March 2026
SURRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURRF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SRSCQ has a market cap of 10.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SURRF is priced at $0.25, while SRSCQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURRF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas SRSCQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SURRF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SRSCQ's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, SURRF is less volatile compared to SRSCQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SURRF.Check SRSCQ's competition here
SURRF vs BONTQ Comparison March 2026
SURRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURRF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, BONTQ has a market cap of 1.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SURRF is priced at $0.25, while BONTQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURRF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas BONTQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SURRF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BONTQ's ROE of -10.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SURRF and BONTQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BONTQ's competition here
SURRF vs CBJCL Comparison March 2026
SURRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURRF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CBJCL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SURRF is priced at $0.25, while CBJCL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURRF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas CBJCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SURRF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CBJCL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SURRF and CBJCL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CBJCL's competition here
SURRF vs SHLDQ Comparison March 2026
SURRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURRF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SHLDQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SURRF is priced at $0.25, while SHLDQ trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURRF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas SHLDQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SURRF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SHLDQ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SURRF and SHLDQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHLDQ's competition here
SURRF vs LFSYF Comparison March 2026
SURRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURRF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, LFSYF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SURRF is priced at $0.25, while LFSYF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURRF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas LFSYF's P/E ratio is -5.23. In terms of profitability, SURRF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LFSYF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SURRF and LFSYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LFSYF's competition here
SURRF vs LFSYY Comparison March 2026
SURRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURRF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, LFSYY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SURRF is priced at $0.25, while LFSYY trades at $14.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURRF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas LFSYY's P/E ratio is -5.05. In terms of profitability, SURRF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LFSYY's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, SURRF and LFSYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LFSYY's competition here