Sumitomo Realty & Development Co., Ltd.
Sumitomo Realty & Development Co., Ltd. SURDF Peers
See (SURDF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SURDF | $38.69 | -0.01% | 19.4B | 14.61 | $2.82 | +1.15% |
| RNHEF | $0.00 | -0.00% | 93.9B | -2.50 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| VNNVF | $35.40 | +6.63% | 29.6B | -35.76 | -$0.99 | +3.96% |
| VONOY | $16.79 | +3.26% | 27.8B | -31.42 | -$0.53 | +3.96% |
| CLNXF | $38.80 | +1.32% | 27.4B | -485.00 | -$0.08 | +0.18% |
| VTAGY | $20.36 | +0.00% | 20.6B | 42.42 | $0.48 | +4.02% |
| VTWRF | $40.06 | +0.00% | 16.7B | 33.00 | $1.00 | +4.52% |
| SWPFF | $2.60 | +4.43% | 14.9B | -129.75 | -$0.02 | +5.44% |
| SURYY | $17.00 | +0.01% | 12.3B | 9.32 | $1.40 | N/A |
| IFSUF | $12.43 | +0.00% | 10.7B | 25.56 | $0.45 | +9.83% |
Stock Comparison
SURDF vs RNHEF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, RNHEF has a market cap of 93.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while RNHEF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas RNHEF's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RNHEF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and RNHEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs VNNVF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, VNNVF has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while VNNVF trades at $35.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas VNNVF's P/E ratio is -35.76. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VNNVF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF is less volatile compared to VNNVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SURDF.
SURDF vs VONOY Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, VONOY has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while VONOY trades at $16.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas VONOY's P/E ratio is -31.42. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VONOY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF is less volatile compared to VONOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SURDF.
SURDF vs CLNXF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, CLNXF has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while CLNXF trades at $38.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas CLNXF's P/E ratio is -485.00. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CLNXF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF is less volatile compared to CLNXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SURDF.
SURDF vs VTAGY Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, VTAGY has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while VTAGY trades at $20.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas VTAGY's P/E ratio is 42.42. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VTAGY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and VTAGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs VTWRF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, VTWRF has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while VTWRF trades at $40.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas VTWRF's P/E ratio is 33.00. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VTWRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and VTWRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs SWPFF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, SWPFF has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while SWPFF trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas SWPFF's P/E ratio is -129.75. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SWPFF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF is less volatile compared to SWPFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SURDF.
SURDF vs SURYY Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, SURYY has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while SURYY trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas SURYY's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SURYY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and SURYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs IFSUF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, IFSUF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while IFSUF trades at $12.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas IFSUF's P/E ratio is 25.56. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IFSUF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and IFSUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs CLILF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, CLILF has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while CLILF trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas CLILF's P/E ratio is 27.57. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CLILF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and CLILF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs AZRGF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, AZRGF has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while AZRGF trades at $69.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas AZRGF's P/E ratio is 20.04. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AZRGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and AZRGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs HULCF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, HULCF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while HULCF trades at $10.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas HULCF's P/E ratio is 11.99. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HULCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and HULCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs SWPRF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, SWPRF has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while SWPRF trades at $135.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas SWPRF's P/E ratio is 17.66. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SWPRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and SWPRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs NXDCF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, NXDCF has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while NXDCF trades at $9.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas NXDCF's P/E ratio is -179.43. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NXDCF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and NXDCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs WRFRF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, WRFRF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while WRFRF trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas WRFRF's P/E ratio is 60.00. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WRFRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and WRFRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs ESRCF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, ESRCF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while ESRCF trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas ESRCF's P/E ratio is -8.88. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ESRCF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and ESRCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs LEGIF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, LEGIF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while LEGIF trades at $84.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas LEGIF's P/E ratio is 33.82. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LEGIF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and LEGIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs LGMMY Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, LGMMY has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while LGMMY trades at $21.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas LGMMY's P/E ratio is 4.27. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LGMMY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and LGMMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs SCOTF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, SCOTF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while SCOTF trades at $80.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas SCOTF's P/E ratio is 32.39. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SCOTF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and SCOTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs HLPPF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, HLPPF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while HLPPF trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas HLPPF's P/E ratio is 17.17. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HLPPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and HLPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs NMEHF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, NMEHF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while NMEHF trades at $5.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas NMEHF's P/E ratio is 9.58. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NMEHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and NMEHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs HLPPY Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, HLPPY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while HLPPY trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas HLPPY's P/E ratio is 16.59. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HLPPY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF is less volatile compared to HLPPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SURDF.
SURDF vs FBGGF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, FBGGF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while FBGGF trades at $7.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas FBGGF's P/E ratio is 136.64. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FBGGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and FBGGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs SSSAF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, SSSAF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while SSSAF trades at $42.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas SSSAF's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SSSAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and SSSAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs CWSRF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, CWSRF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while CWSRF trades at $12.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas CWSRF's P/E ratio is 87.73. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CWSRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF is less volatile compared to CWSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SURDF.
SURDF vs TYTMF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, TYTMF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while TYTMF trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas TYTMF's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TYTMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and TYTMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs TAGYY Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, TAGYY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while TAGYY trades at $5.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas TAGYY's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TAGYY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and TAGYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs AANNF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, AANNF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while AANNF trades at $3.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas AANNF's P/E ratio is 11.76. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AANNF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and AANNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs IWGFF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, IWGFF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while IWGFF trades at $3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas IWGFF's P/E ratio is 151.00. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IWGFF's ROE of -1.89%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF is less volatile compared to IWGFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SURDF.
SURDF vs CTRGF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, CTRGF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while CTRGF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas CTRGF's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CTRGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and CTRGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs VGPBF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, VGPBF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while VGPBF trades at $102.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas VGPBF's P/E ratio is 7.98. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VGPBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and VGPBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs CGSHY Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, CGSHY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while CGSHY trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas CGSHY's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CGSHY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and CGSHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs TAGOF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, TAGOF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while TAGOF trades at $16.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas TAGOF's P/E ratio is 19.12. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TAGOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and TAGOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs GRDDY Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, GRDDY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while GRDDY trades at $12.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas GRDDY's P/E ratio is 8.37. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GRDDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and GRDDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs CNPPF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, CNPPF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while CNPPF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas CNPPF's P/E ratio is 10.61. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNPPF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and CNPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs GRGTF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, GRGTF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while GRGTF trades at $2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas GRGTF's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GRGTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and GRGTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs SRRLF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, SRRLF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while SRRLF trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas SRRLF's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SRRLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and SRRLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs HYSNF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, HYSNF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while HYSNF trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas HYSNF's P/E ratio is -23.87. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HYSNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and HYSNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs GRNNF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, GRNNF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while GRNNF trades at $12.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas GRNNF's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GRNNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and GRNNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs WIHLY Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, WIHLY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while WIHLY trades at $6.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas WIHLY's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WIHLY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and WIHLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs DUSCF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, DUSCF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while DUSCF trades at $22.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas DUSCF's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DUSCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and DUSCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs ASGTF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, ASGTF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while ASGTF trades at $39.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas ASGTF's P/E ratio is 494.02. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ASGTF's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and ASGTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs SVLPF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, SVLPF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while SVLPF trades at $13.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas SVLPF's P/E ratio is 24.08. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SVLPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and SVLPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs EVGPF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, EVGPF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while EVGPF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas EVGPF's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EVGPF's ROE of +4.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and EVGPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs ENTOF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, ENTOF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while ENTOF trades at $11.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas ENTOF's P/E ratio is -3.08. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ENTOF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and ENTOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs FBGBY Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, FBGBY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while FBGBY trades at $18.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas FBGBY's P/E ratio is 4.20. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FBGBY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and FBGBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs MEQYF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, MEQYF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while MEQYF trades at $133.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas MEQYF's P/E ratio is 7.05. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MEQYF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and MEQYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs ACNDF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, ACNDF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while ACNDF trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas ACNDF's P/E ratio is 3.49. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ACNDF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF is less volatile compared to ACNDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SURDF.
SURDF vs VIBVY Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, VIBVY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while VIBVY trades at $33.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas VIBVY's P/E ratio is 14.63. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VIBVY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and VIBVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs ICHIF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, ICHIF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while ICHIF trades at $2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas ICHIF's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ICHIF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and ICHIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs SVAUF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, SVAUF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while SVAUF trades at $3.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas SVAUF's P/E ratio is -42.69. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SVAUF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and SVAUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs GRMHF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, GRMHF has a market cap of 985.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while GRMHF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas GRMHF's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GRMHF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and GRMHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs RLHPF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, RLHPF has a market cap of 962.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while RLHPF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas RLHPF's P/E ratio is 43.14. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RLHPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and RLHPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs HYSNY Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, HYSNY has a market cap of 911.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while HYSNY trades at $3.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas HYSNY's P/E ratio is 355.00. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HYSNY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and HYSNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs SSHLF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, SSHLF has a market cap of 874.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while SSHLF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas SSHLF's P/E ratio is -14.31. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SSHLF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and SSHLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs MMHTF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, MMHTF has a market cap of 780.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while MMHTF trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas MMHTF's P/E ratio is 8.07. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MMHTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and MMHTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs PTLKF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, PTLKF has a market cap of 666.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while PTLKF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas PTLKF's P/E ratio is 0.47. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PTLKF's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and PTLKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs SSHLY Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, SSHLY has a market cap of 613.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while SSHLY trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas SSHLY's P/E ratio is -10.03. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SSHLY's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and SSHLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs GBCEY Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, GBCEY has a market cap of 488.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while GBCEY trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas GBCEY's P/E ratio is 17.89. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GBCEY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and GBCEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs KWLGF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, KWLGF has a market cap of 470.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while KWLGF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas KWLGF's P/E ratio is 4.65. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KWLGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and KWLGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs JPPSF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, JPPSF has a market cap of 447.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while JPPSF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas JPPSF's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPPSF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and JPPSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs SHMSF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, SHMSF has a market cap of 441.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while SHMSF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas SHMSF's P/E ratio is -8.99. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SHMSF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and SHMSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs DLMI Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, DLMI has a market cap of 372.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while DLMI trades at $10.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas DLMI's P/E ratio is -1.69. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DLMI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and DLMI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs AGGHF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, AGGHF has a market cap of 363.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while AGGHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas AGGHF's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AGGHF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and AGGHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs LSLPF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, LSLPF has a market cap of 331.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while LSLPF trades at $3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas LSLPF's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LSLPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and LSLPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs SOHOF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, SOHOF has a market cap of 327.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while SOHOF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas SOHOF's P/E ratio is -6.30. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SOHOF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and SOHOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs MDTWF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, MDTWF has a market cap of 324.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while MDTWF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas MDTWF's P/E ratio is 7.41. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MDTWF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and MDTWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs MDPCF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, MDPCF has a market cap of 251.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while MDPCF trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas MDPCF's P/E ratio is 5.89. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MDPCF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and MDPCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs NTPIF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, NTPIF has a market cap of 236.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while NTPIF trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas NTPIF's P/E ratio is 3.02. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NTPIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF is less volatile compared to NTPIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SURDF.
SURDF vs FXTGY Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, FXTGY has a market cap of 233.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while FXTGY trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas FXTGY's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FXTGY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and FXTGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs SDWHF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, SDWHF has a market cap of 195.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while SDWHF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas SDWHF's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SDWHF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and SDWHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs FCRIF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, FCRIF has a market cap of 176.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while FCRIF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas FCRIF's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FCRIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and FCRIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs MRFGF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, MRFGF has a market cap of 152.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while MRFGF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas MRFGF's P/E ratio is -6.48. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MRFGF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and MRFGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs TPRP Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, TPRP has a market cap of 126M. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while TPRP trades at $21,000.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas TPRP's P/E ratio is 454.55. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TPRP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF is less volatile compared to TPRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SURDF.
SURDF vs BREUF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, BREUF has a market cap of 105.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while BREUF trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas BREUF's P/E ratio is -17.98. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BREUF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and BREUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs MHIVF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, MHIVF has a market cap of 96M. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while MHIVF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas MHIVF's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MHIVF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and MHIVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs PKTEF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, PKTEF has a market cap of 96M. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while PKTEF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas PKTEF's P/E ratio is -44.01. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PKTEF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and PKTEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs AZLCZ Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, AZLCZ has a market cap of 95M. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while AZLCZ trades at $1,060.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas AZLCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AZLCZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and AZLCZ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs OJOC Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, OJOC has a market cap of 93.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while OJOC trades at $335.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas OJOC's P/E ratio is 41.78. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OJOC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and OJOC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs CPTP Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, CPTP has a market cap of 76.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while CPTP trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas CPTP's P/E ratio is 33.00. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CPTP's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF is less volatile compared to CPTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SURDF.
SURDF vs BVERS Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, BVERS has a market cap of 75.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while BVERS trades at $3,050.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas BVERS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BVERS's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and BVERS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs CRSS Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, CRSS has a market cap of 74.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while CRSS trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas CRSS's P/E ratio is -3.54. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CRSS's ROE of +18.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF is less volatile compared to CRSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SURDF.
SURDF vs TNHDF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, TNHDF has a market cap of 49.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while TNHDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas TNHDF's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TNHDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and TNHDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs ADPPF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, ADPPF has a market cap of 41.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while ADPPF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas ADPPF's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ADPPF's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and ADPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs PCPDF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, PCPDF has a market cap of 36.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while PCPDF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas PCPDF's P/E ratio is -1.81. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PCPDF's ROE of +4.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and PCPDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs MDICF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, MDICF has a market cap of 32.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while MDICF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas MDICF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MDICF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and MDICF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs LGYSF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, LGYSF has a market cap of 27.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while LGYSF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas LGYSF's P/E ratio is 2.40. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LGYSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and LGYSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs ABCP Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, ABCP has a market cap of 25.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while ABCP trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas ABCP's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ABCP's ROE of +1.83%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF is less volatile compared to ABCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SURDF.
SURDF vs ASPZ Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, ASPZ has a market cap of 21.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while ASPZ trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas ASPZ's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ASPZ's ROE of +1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF is less volatile compared to ASPZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SURDF.
SURDF vs MNGGF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, MNGGF has a market cap of 21.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while MNGGF trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas MNGGF's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MNGGF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF is less volatile compared to MNGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SURDF.
SURDF vs DIVVZ Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, DIVVZ has a market cap of 18.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while DIVVZ trades at $404.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas DIVVZ's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DIVVZ's ROE of +15.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and DIVVZ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs BCKMF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, BCKMF has a market cap of 17.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while BCKMF trades at $9.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas BCKMF's P/E ratio is 7.15. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BCKMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and BCKMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs ATTGF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, ATTGF has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while ATTGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas ATTGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ATTGF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and ATTGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs TRPTF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, TRPTF has a market cap of 12.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while TRPTF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas TRPTF's P/E ratio is -2.58. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TRPTF's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and TRPTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs MGAG Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, MGAG has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while MGAG trades at $300.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas MGAG's P/E ratio is 48.08. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MGAG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and MGAG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs ADHLF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, ADHLF has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while ADHLF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas ADHLF's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ADHLF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and ADHLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs MHPC Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, MHPC has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while MHPC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas MHPC's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MHPC's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and MHPC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs PRPPF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, PRPPF has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while PRPPF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas PRPPF's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PRPPF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and PRPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SURDF vs MSGNF Comparison
SURDF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SURDF stands at 19.4B. In comparison, MSGNF has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SURDF is priced at $38.69, while MSGNF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SURDF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.61, whereas MSGNF's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, SURDF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MSGNF's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, SURDF and MSGNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).