Schroder UK Public Private Trust plc
Schroder UK Public Private Trust plc SUPP.L Peers
See (SUPP.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUPP.L | $14.60 | +1.04% | 131.76M | -0.66 | -$0.22 | N/A |
| CNDX.L | $1,222.00 | +0.02% | 21.46T | 32.97 | $37.06 | N/A |
| IUSA.L | $4,430.50 | -0.54% | 1.30T | N/A | N/A | +1.07% |
| SSAC.L | $7,001.00 | -0.38% | 1.05T | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SMEA.L | $7,189.00 | -0.11% | 840.72B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| XESC.L | $7,910.50 | +0.44% | 788.23B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| XESX.L | $4,816.75 | +0.42% | 787.98B | N/A | N/A | +2.69% |
| MEUD.L | $22,055.00 | +0.41% | 762.48B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| IITU.L | $2,504.00 | -0.83% | 737.26B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| CNAL.L | $11,292.00 | -0.92% | 637.70B | -10.55 | -$10.70 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SUPP.L vs CNDX.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, CNDX.L has a market cap of 21.46T. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while CNDX.L trades at $1,222.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas CNDX.L's P/E ratio is 32.97. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CNDX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to CNDX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs IUSA.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, IUSA.L has a market cap of 1.30T. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while IUSA.L trades at $4,430.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas IUSA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to IUSA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to IUSA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs SSAC.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, SSAC.L has a market cap of 1.05T. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while SSAC.L trades at $7,001.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas SSAC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SSAC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to SSAC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs SMEA.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, SMEA.L has a market cap of 840.72B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while SMEA.L trades at $7,189.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas SMEA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SMEA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to SMEA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs XESC.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, XESC.L has a market cap of 788.23B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while XESC.L trades at $7,910.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas XESC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to XESC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to XESC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs XESX.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, XESX.L has a market cap of 787.98B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while XESX.L trades at $4,816.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas XESX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to XESX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to XESX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs MEUD.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, MEUD.L has a market cap of 762.48B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while MEUD.L trades at $22,055.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas MEUD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to MEUD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to MEUD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs IITU.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, IITU.L has a market cap of 737.26B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while IITU.L trades at $2,504.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas IITU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to IITU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to IITU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs CNAL.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, CNAL.L has a market cap of 637.70B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while CNAL.L trades at $11,292.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas CNAL.L's P/E ratio is -10.55. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CNAL.L's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L and CNAL.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SUPP.L vs IWRD.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, IWRD.L has a market cap of 553.12B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while IWRD.L trades at $6,176.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas IWRD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to IWRD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to IWRD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs XDAX.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, XDAX.L has a market cap of 541.32B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while XDAX.L trades at $18,884.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas XDAX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to XDAX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to XDAX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs PHGP.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, PHGP.L has a market cap of 492.47B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while PHGP.L trades at $22,553.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas PHGP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to PHGP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to PHGP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs GLDA.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, GLDA.L has a market cap of 479.99B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while GLDA.L trades at $9,601.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas GLDA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to GLDA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to GLDA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs XMMS.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, XMMS.L has a market cap of 479.97B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while XMMS.L trades at $4,667.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas XMMS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to XMMS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to XMMS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs MXWS.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, MXWS.L has a market cap of 466.57B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while MXWS.L trades at $9,061.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas MXWS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to MXWS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to MXWS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs XMUS.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, XMUS.L has a market cap of 440.40B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while XMUS.L trades at $13,199.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas XMUS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to XMUS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to XMUS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs UC44.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, UC44.L has a market cap of 428.61B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while UC44.L trades at $12,790.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas UC44.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to UC44.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to UC44.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs XMEU.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, XMEU.L has a market cap of 428.06B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while XMEU.L trades at $8,322.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas XMEU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to XMEU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to XMEU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs CS51.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, CS51.L has a market cap of 413.47B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while CS51.L trades at $17,298.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas CS51.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CS51.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to CS51.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs EUE.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, EUE.L has a market cap of 369.85B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while EUE.L trades at $4,685.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas EUE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to EUE.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to EUE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs IEEM.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, IEEM.L has a market cap of 365.68B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while IEEM.L trades at $3,428.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas IEEM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to IEEM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to IEEM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs UB32.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, UB32.L has a market cap of 345.37B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while UB32.L trades at $8,720.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas UB32.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to UB32.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to UB32.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs CACX.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, CACX.L has a market cap of 339.29B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while CACX.L trades at $6,621.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas CACX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CACX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to CACX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs XSX6.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, XSX6.L has a market cap of 305.63B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while XSX6.L trades at $11,694.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas XSX6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to XSX6.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to XSX6.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs SEMA.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, SEMA.L has a market cap of 303.13B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while SEMA.L trades at $3,224.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas SEMA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SEMA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to SEMA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs IWFQ.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, IWFQ.L has a market cap of 293.97B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while IWFQ.L trades at $5,341.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas IWFQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to IWFQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to IWFQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs GBSS.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, GBSS.L has a market cap of 292.45B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while GBSS.L trades at $22,206.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas GBSS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to GBSS.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to GBSS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs IWFV.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, IWFV.L has a market cap of 273.37B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while IWFV.L trades at $3,603.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas IWFV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to IWFV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to IWFV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs SGBX.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, SGBX.L has a market cap of 268.03B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while SGBX.L trades at $23,173.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas SGBX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SGBX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to SGBX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs ISPY.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, ISPY.L has a market cap of 242.76B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while ISPY.L trades at $2,269.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas ISPY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to ISPY.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to ISPY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs CEA1.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, CEA1.L has a market cap of 233.38B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while CEA1.L trades at $14,593.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas CEA1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CEA1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to CEA1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs CPJ1.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, CPJ1.L has a market cap of 224.24B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while CPJ1.L trades at $14,938.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas CPJ1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CPJ1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to CPJ1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs RBTX.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, RBTX.L has a market cap of 223.15B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while RBTX.L trades at $1,062.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas RBTX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to RBTX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to RBTX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs JERE.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, JERE.L has a market cap of 221.80B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while JERE.L trades at $3,901.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas JERE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to JERE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to JERE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs JRDE.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, JRDE.L has a market cap of 221.64B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while JRDE.L trades at $3,660.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas JRDE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to JRDE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to JRDE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs SUES.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, SUES.L has a market cap of 217.70B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while SUES.L trades at $590.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas SUES.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SUES.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to SUES.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs IUQF.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, IUQF.L has a market cap of 201.38B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while IUQF.L trades at $1,116.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas IUQF.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to IUQF.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to IUQF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs IWFM.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, IWFM.L has a market cap of 196.54B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while IWFM.L trades at $6,520.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas IWFM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to IWFM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to IWFM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs HMEF.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, HMEF.L has a market cap of 194.75B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while HMEF.L trades at $873.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas HMEF.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to HMEF.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to HMEF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs PHSP.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, PHSP.L has a market cap of 189.03B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while PHSP.L trades at $2,217.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas PHSP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to PHSP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to PHSP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs XDEV.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, XDEV.L has a market cap of 184.91B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while XDEV.L trades at $3,703.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas XDEV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to XDEV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to XDEV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs SOYU.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, SOYU.L has a market cap of 178.63B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while SOYU.L trades at $307.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas SOYU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SOYU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to SOYU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs SPGP.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, SPGP.L has a market cap of 169.79B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while SPGP.L trades at $1,625.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas SPGP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SPGP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to SPGP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs CEUR.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, CEUR.L has a market cap of 169.53B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while CEUR.L trades at $30,870.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas CEUR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CEUR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to CEUR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs UIFS.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, UIFS.L has a market cap of 168.36B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while UIFS.L trades at $1,122.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas UIFS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to UIFS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to UIFS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs XXSC.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, XXSC.L has a market cap of 167.62B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while XXSC.L trades at $5,384.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas XXSC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to XXSC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to XXSC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs XDEQ.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, XDEQ.L has a market cap of 159.75B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while XDEQ.L trades at $5,431.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas XDEQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to XDEQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to XDEQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs PRIR.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, PRIR.L has a market cap of 148.45B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while PRIR.L trades at $1,458.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas PRIR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to PRIR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to PRIR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs GBSP.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, GBSP.L has a market cap of 143.31B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while GBSP.L trades at $1,666.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas GBSP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to GBSP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to GBSP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs IEFV.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, IEFV.L has a market cap of 140.80B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while IEFV.L trades at $851.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas IEFV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to IEFV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to IEFV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs CU1.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, CU1.L has a market cap of 140.67B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while CU1.L trades at $45,600.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas CU1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CU1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to CU1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs ISP6.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, ISP6.L has a market cap of 136.60B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while ISP6.L trades at $6,520.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas ISP6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to ISP6.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to ISP6.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs IPRP.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, IPRP.L has a market cap of 135.29B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while IPRP.L trades at $2,638.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas IPRP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to IPRP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to IPRP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs WATL.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, WATL.L has a market cap of 135.00B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while WATL.L trades at $5,779.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas WATL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to WATL.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to WATL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs GILS.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, GILS.L has a market cap of 131.52B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while GILS.L trades at $10,055.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas GILS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to GILS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to GILS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs XZEU.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, XZEU.L has a market cap of 131.42B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while XZEU.L trades at $2,801.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas XZEU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to XZEU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to XZEU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs CUS1.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, CUS1.L has a market cap of 129.02B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while CUS1.L trades at $38,365.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas CUS1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CUS1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to CUS1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs 0GWB.IL Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, 0GWB.IL has a market cap of 127.05B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while 0GWB.IL trades at $514.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 0GWB.IL's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 0GWB.IL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to 0GWB.IL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs XCX6.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, XCX6.L has a market cap of 127.00B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while XCX6.L trades at $1,328.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas XCX6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to XCX6.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to XCX6.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs UC79.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, UC79.L has a market cap of 121.06B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while UC79.L trades at $1,095.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas UC79.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to UC79.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to UC79.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs INFL.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, INFL.L has a market cap of 120.53B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while INFL.L trades at $9,631.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas INFL.L's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to INFL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to INFL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs CG1.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, CG1.L has a market cap of 118.67B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while CG1.L trades at $35,772.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas CG1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CG1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to CG1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs SP5G.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, SP5G.L has a market cap of 116.76B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while SP5G.L trades at $201.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas SP5G.L's P/E ratio is 62.67. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SP5G.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to SP5G.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs CB5.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, CB5.L has a market cap of 115.71B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while CB5.L trades at $3,850.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas CB5.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CB5.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to CB5.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs CSPX.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, CSPX.L has a market cap of 113.56B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while CSPX.L trades at $632.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas CSPX.L's P/E ratio is 26.10. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CSPX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to CSPX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs XRSG.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, XRSG.L has a market cap of 112.12B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while XRSG.L trades at $22,961.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas XRSG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to XRSG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to XRSG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs IJPN.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, IJPN.L has a market cap of 110.97B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while IJPN.L trades at $1,378.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas IJPN.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to IJPN.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to IJPN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs IGSG.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, IGSG.L has a market cap of 110.74B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while IGSG.L trades at $5,865.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas IGSG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to IGSG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to IGSG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs XDEM.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, XDEM.L has a market cap of 109.09B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while XDEM.L trades at $5,491.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas XDEM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to XDEM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to XDEM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs SPEX.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, SPEX.L has a market cap of 108.43B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while SPEX.L trades at $4,511.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas SPEX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SPEX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to SPEX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs SPES.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, SPES.L has a market cap of 108.38B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while SPES.L trades at $4,262.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas SPES.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SPES.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to SPES.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs H50E.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, H50E.L has a market cap of 107.87B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while H50E.L trades at $4,878.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas H50E.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to H50E.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to H50E.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs JRDM.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, JRDM.L has a market cap of 107.15B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while JRDM.L trades at $2,325.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas JRDM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to JRDM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L and JRDM.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SUPP.L vs IEUX.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, IEUX.L has a market cap of 107.13B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while IEUX.L trades at $4,073.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas IEUX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to IEUX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to IEUX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs PRIC.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, PRIC.L has a market cap of 106.58B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while PRIC.L trades at $1,592.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas PRIC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to PRIC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to PRIC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs RIEG.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, RIEG.L has a market cap of 106.28B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while RIEG.L trades at $1,444.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas RIEG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to RIEG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to RIEG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs IWDA.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, IWDA.L has a market cap of 103.40B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while IWDA.L trades at $112.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas IWDA.L's P/E ratio is 22.69. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to IWDA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to IWDA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs IMV.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, IMV.L has a market cap of 101.88B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while IMV.L trades at $5,745.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas IMV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to IMV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to IMV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs DAXX.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, DAXX.L has a market cap of 101.81B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while DAXX.L trades at $18,422.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas DAXX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to DAXX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to DAXX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs CSCA.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, CSCA.L has a market cap of 97.69B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while CSCA.L trades at $16,768.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas CSCA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CSCA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to CSCA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs MTIX.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, MTIX.L has a market cap of 93.31B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while MTIX.L trades at $13,999.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas MTIX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to MTIX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L and MTIX.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SUPP.L vs UB45.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, UB45.L has a market cap of 92.89B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while UB45.L trades at $6,088.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas UB45.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to UB45.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to UB45.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs PRIJ.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, PRIJ.L has a market cap of 92.14B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while PRIJ.L trades at $2,378.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas PRIJ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to PRIJ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to PRIJ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs IUKD.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, IUKD.L has a market cap of 91.41B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while IUKD.L trades at $823.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas IUKD.L's P/E ratio is 14.77. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to IUKD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to IUKD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs WQDS.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, WQDS.L has a market cap of 90.38B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while WQDS.L trades at $553.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas WQDS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to WQDS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to WQDS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs XDN0.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, XDN0.L has a market cap of 89.35B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while XDN0.L trades at $4,198.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas XDN0.L's P/E ratio is 17.87. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to XDN0.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to XDN0.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs EQDS.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, EQDS.L has a market cap of 87.93B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while EQDS.L trades at $545.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas EQDS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to EQDS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to EQDS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs COMM.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, COMM.L has a market cap of 87.78B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while COMM.L trades at $535.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas COMM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to COMM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to COMM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs XLKQ.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, XLKQ.L has a market cap of 86.39B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while XLKQ.L trades at $51,350.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas XLKQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to XLKQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to XLKQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs XDEB.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, XDEB.L has a market cap of 85.47B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while XDEB.L trades at $3,643.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas XDEB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to XDEB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to XDEB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs CRPX.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, CRPX.L has a market cap of 85.16B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while CRPX.L trades at $12,802.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas CRPX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CRPX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L and CRPX.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SUPP.L vs CSP1.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, CSP1.L has a market cap of 84.96B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while CSP1.L trades at $47,324.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas CSP1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CSP1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to CSP1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs IGUS.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, IGUS.L has a market cap of 82.77B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while IGUS.L trades at $13,554.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas IGUS.L's P/E ratio is 25.81. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to IGUS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to IGUS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs INAA.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, INAA.L has a market cap of 80.01B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while INAA.L trades at $8,240.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas INAA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to INAA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to INAA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs IDVY.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, IDVY.L has a market cap of 77.97B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while IDVY.L trades at $1,859.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas IDVY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to IDVY.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to IDVY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs HMCH.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, HMCH.L has a market cap of 77.79B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while HMCH.L trades at $558.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas HMCH.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to HMCH.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to HMCH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs EQSG.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, EQSG.L has a market cap of 77.42B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while EQSG.L trades at $4,978.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas EQSG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to EQSG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to EQSG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs SWDA.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, SWDA.L has a market cap of 77.34B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while SWDA.L trades at $8,448.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas SWDA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SWDA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to SWDA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.
SUPP.L vs GLDW.L Comparison
SUPP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPP.L stands at 131.76M. In comparison, GLDW.L has a market cap of 75.96B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPP.L is priced at $14.60, while GLDW.L trades at $24,066.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPP.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas GLDW.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPP.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to GLDW.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPP.L is less volatile compared to GLDW.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPP.L.