Supreme Plc
Supreme Plc SUP.L Peers
See (SUP.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUP.L | £200.00 | N/A | 234.6M | 10.00 | £0.20 | +2.50% |
| 0NX2.L | £27.51 | -0.48% | 58.6B | 12.23 | £2.25 | +1.53% |
| 0HF7.L | £178.24 | -0.63% | 41.2B | 39.79 | £4.48 | +0.82% |
| 0L2T.L | £25.50 | -5.56% | 7.7B | N/A | N/A | +0.47% |
| 0RQH.L | £43.00 | -2.38% | 7.6B | 15.41 | £2.79 | +3.25% |
| 0G9R.L | £165.20 | N/A | 1.4B | -103.64 | -£1.59 | N/A |
| SMS.L | £954.00 | +0.21% | 1.3B | 86.73 | £0.11 | +0.87% |
| 0REY.L | £159.98 | N/A | 998M | 43.93 | £3.64 | N/A |
| 0R1J.L | £18.11 | N/A | 988.4M | -18.71 | -£0.97 | N/A |
| VLX.L | £306.00 | +0.49% | 562.5M | 18.00 | £0.17 | +1.10% |
Stock Comparison
SUP.L vs 0NX2.L Comparison
SUP.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP.L stands at 234.6M. In comparison, 0NX2.L has a market cap of 58.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SUP.L is priced at £200.00, while 0NX2.L trades at £27.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas 0NX2.L's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, SUP.L's ROE is +0.39%, compared to 0NX2.L's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP.L is more volatile compared to 0NX2.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.L.
SUP.L vs 0HF7.L Comparison
SUP.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP.L stands at 234.6M. In comparison, 0HF7.L has a market cap of 41.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SUP.L is priced at £200.00, while 0HF7.L trades at £178.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas 0HF7.L's P/E ratio is 39.79. In terms of profitability, SUP.L's ROE is +0.39%, compared to 0HF7.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP.L is more volatile compared to 0HF7.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.L.
SUP.L vs 0L2T.L Comparison
SUP.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP.L stands at 234.6M. In comparison, 0L2T.L has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SUP.L is priced at £200.00, while 0L2T.L trades at £25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas 0L2T.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUP.L's ROE is +0.39%, compared to 0L2T.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP.L is more volatile compared to 0L2T.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.L.
SUP.L vs 0RQH.L Comparison
SUP.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP.L stands at 234.6M. In comparison, 0RQH.L has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SUP.L is priced at £200.00, while 0RQH.L trades at £43.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas 0RQH.L's P/E ratio is 15.41. In terms of profitability, SUP.L's ROE is +0.39%, compared to 0RQH.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP.L is more volatile compared to 0RQH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.L.
SUP.L vs 0G9R.L Comparison
SUP.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP.L stands at 234.6M. In comparison, 0G9R.L has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SUP.L is priced at £200.00, while 0G9R.L trades at £165.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas 0G9R.L's P/E ratio is -103.64. In terms of profitability, SUP.L's ROE is +0.39%, compared to 0G9R.L's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP.L is less volatile compared to 0G9R.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.L.
SUP.L vs SMS.L Comparison
SUP.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP.L stands at 234.6M. In comparison, SMS.L has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SUP.L is priced at £200.00, while SMS.L trades at £954.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas SMS.L's P/E ratio is 86.73. In terms of profitability, SUP.L's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SMS.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP.L is more volatile compared to SMS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.L.
SUP.L vs 0REY.L Comparison
SUP.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP.L stands at 234.6M. In comparison, 0REY.L has a market cap of 998M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP.L is priced at £200.00, while 0REY.L trades at £159.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas 0REY.L's P/E ratio is 43.93. In terms of profitability, SUP.L's ROE is +0.39%, compared to 0REY.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP.L is more volatile compared to 0REY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.L.
SUP.L vs 0R1J.L Comparison
SUP.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP.L stands at 234.6M. In comparison, 0R1J.L has a market cap of 988.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP.L is priced at £200.00, while 0R1J.L trades at £18.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas 0R1J.L's P/E ratio is -18.71. In terms of profitability, SUP.L's ROE is +0.39%, compared to 0R1J.L's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP.L is less volatile compared to 0R1J.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.L.
SUP.L vs VLX.L Comparison
SUP.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP.L stands at 234.6M. In comparison, VLX.L has a market cap of 562.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP.L is priced at £200.00, while VLX.L trades at £306.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas VLX.L's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, SUP.L's ROE is +0.39%, compared to VLX.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP.L is less volatile compared to VLX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.L.
SUP.L vs TFW.L Comparison
SUP.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP.L stands at 234.6M. In comparison, TFW.L has a market cap of 352.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP.L is priced at £200.00, while TFW.L trades at £302.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas TFW.L's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, SUP.L's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TFW.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP.L is less volatile compared to TFW.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.L.
SUP.L vs 0QJY.L Comparison
SUP.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP.L stands at 234.6M. In comparison, 0QJY.L has a market cap of 314M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP.L is priced at £200.00, while 0QJY.L trades at £498.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas 0QJY.L's P/E ratio is -185.34. In terms of profitability, SUP.L's ROE is +0.39%, compared to 0QJY.L's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP.L is more volatile compared to 0QJY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.L.
SUP.L vs 0QPV.L Comparison
SUP.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP.L stands at 234.6M. In comparison, 0QPV.L has a market cap of 294.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP.L is priced at £200.00, while 0QPV.L trades at £0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas 0QPV.L's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, SUP.L's ROE is +0.39%, compared to 0QPV.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP.L is more volatile compared to 0QPV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.L.
SUP.L vs 0A60.L Comparison
SUP.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP.L stands at 234.6M. In comparison, 0A60.L has a market cap of 254.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP.L is priced at £200.00, while 0A60.L trades at £7.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas 0A60.L's P/E ratio is -24.93. In terms of profitability, SUP.L's ROE is +0.39%, compared to 0A60.L's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP.L is less volatile compared to 0A60.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.L.
SUP.L vs XPP.L Comparison
SUP.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP.L stands at 234.6M. In comparison, XPP.L has a market cap of 239.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP.L is priced at £200.00, while XPP.L trades at £857.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas XPP.L's P/E ratio is -20.90. In terms of profitability, SUP.L's ROE is +0.39%, compared to XPP.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP.L is less volatile compared to XPP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.L.
SUP.L vs 0QP6.L Comparison
SUP.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP.L stands at 234.6M. In comparison, 0QP6.L has a market cap of 225.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP.L is priced at £200.00, while 0QP6.L trades at £0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas 0QP6.L's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, SUP.L's ROE is +0.39%, compared to 0QP6.L's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP.L is less volatile compared to 0QP6.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.L.
SUP.L vs LUCE.L Comparison
SUP.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP.L stands at 234.6M. In comparison, LUCE.L has a market cap of 219.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP.L is priced at £200.00, while LUCE.L trades at £143.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas LUCE.L's P/E ratio is 15.96. In terms of profitability, SUP.L's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LUCE.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP.L is less volatile compared to LUCE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.L.
SUP.L vs 0MJH.L Comparison
SUP.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP.L stands at 234.6M. In comparison, 0MJH.L has a market cap of 202.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP.L is priced at £200.00, while 0MJH.L trades at £4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas 0MJH.L's P/E ratio is 3.24. In terms of profitability, SUP.L's ROE is +0.39%, compared to 0MJH.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP.L is less volatile compared to 0MJH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.L.
SUP.L vs 0QL5.L Comparison
SUP.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP.L stands at 234.6M. In comparison, 0QL5.L has a market cap of 157.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP.L is priced at £200.00, while 0QL5.L trades at £214.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas 0QL5.L's P/E ratio is 7.54. In terms of profitability, SUP.L's ROE is +0.39%, compared to 0QL5.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP.L is less volatile compared to 0QL5.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.L.
SUP.L vs CWR.L Comparison
SUP.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP.L stands at 234.6M. In comparison, CWR.L has a market cap of 154.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP.L is priced at £200.00, while CWR.L trades at £79.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas CWR.L's P/E ratio is -5.31. In terms of profitability, SUP.L's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CWR.L's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP.L is less volatile compared to CWR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.L.
SUP.L vs AFC.L Comparison
SUP.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP.L stands at 234.6M. In comparison, AFC.L has a market cap of 136.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP.L is priced at £200.00, while AFC.L trades at £15.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas AFC.L's P/E ratio is -7.99. In terms of profitability, SUP.L's ROE is +0.39%, compared to AFC.L's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP.L is less volatile compared to AFC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.L.
SUP.L vs IKA.L Comparison
SUP.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP.L stands at 234.6M. In comparison, IKA.L has a market cap of 63.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP.L is priced at £200.00, while IKA.L trades at £35.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas IKA.L's P/E ratio is -17.50. In terms of profitability, SUP.L's ROE is +0.39%, compared to IKA.L's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP.L is less volatile compared to IKA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.L.
SUP.L vs 0O27.L Comparison
SUP.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP.L stands at 234.6M. In comparison, 0O27.L has a market cap of 62.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP.L is priced at £200.00, while 0O27.L trades at £10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas 0O27.L's P/E ratio is -15.07. In terms of profitability, SUP.L's ROE is +0.39%, compared to 0O27.L's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP.L is more volatile compared to 0O27.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.L.
SUP.L vs DWHA.L Comparison
SUP.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP.L stands at 234.6M. In comparison, DWHA.L has a market cap of 53.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP.L is priced at £200.00, while DWHA.L trades at £542.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas DWHA.L's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, SUP.L's ROE is +0.39%, compared to DWHA.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP.L is more volatile compared to DWHA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.L.
SUP.L vs DWHT.L Comparison
SUP.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP.L stands at 234.6M. In comparison, DWHT.L has a market cap of 53.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP.L is priced at £200.00, while DWHT.L trades at £880.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas DWHT.L's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, SUP.L's ROE is +0.39%, compared to DWHT.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP.L is more volatile compared to DWHT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.L.
SUP.L vs 0GYQ.L Comparison
SUP.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP.L stands at 234.6M. In comparison, 0GYQ.L has a market cap of 51.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP.L is priced at £200.00, while 0GYQ.L trades at £75.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas 0GYQ.L's P/E ratio is 28.19. In terms of profitability, SUP.L's ROE is +0.39%, compared to 0GYQ.L's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP.L is less volatile compared to 0GYQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.L.
SUP.L vs DIA.L Comparison
SUP.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP.L stands at 234.6M. In comparison, DIA.L has a market cap of 49.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP.L is priced at £200.00, while DIA.L trades at £124.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas DIA.L's P/E ratio is -4.29. In terms of profitability, SUP.L's ROE is +0.39%, compared to DIA.L's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP.L is more volatile compared to DIA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.L.
SUP.L vs GELN.L Comparison
SUP.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP.L stands at 234.6M. In comparison, GELN.L has a market cap of 28.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP.L is priced at £200.00, while GELN.L trades at £19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas GELN.L's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, SUP.L's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GELN.L's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP.L is less volatile compared to GELN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.L.
SUP.L vs EAAS.L Comparison
SUP.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP.L stands at 234.6M. In comparison, EAAS.L has a market cap of 19.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP.L is priced at £200.00, while EAAS.L trades at £4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas EAAS.L's P/E ratio is -4.95. In terms of profitability, SUP.L's ROE is +0.39%, compared to EAAS.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP.L is less volatile compared to EAAS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.L.
SUP.L vs LPA.L Comparison
SUP.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP.L stands at 234.6M. In comparison, LPA.L has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP.L is priced at £200.00, while LPA.L trades at £51.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas LPA.L's P/E ratio is -25.50. In terms of profitability, SUP.L's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LPA.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP.L is less volatile compared to LPA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.L.
SUP.L vs PPS.L Comparison
SUP.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP.L stands at 234.6M. In comparison, PPS.L has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP.L is priced at £200.00, while PPS.L trades at £0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas PPS.L's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, SUP.L's ROE is +0.39%, compared to PPS.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP.L is less volatile compared to PPS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.L.
SUP.L vs DGI.L Comparison
SUP.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP.L stands at 234.6M. In comparison, DGI.L has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP.L is priced at £200.00, while DGI.L trades at £0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas DGI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUP.L's ROE is +0.39%, compared to DGI.L's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP.L is less volatile compared to DGI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.L.
SUP.L vs AMTE.L Comparison
SUP.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP.L stands at 234.6M. In comparison, AMTE.L has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP.L is priced at £200.00, while AMTE.L trades at £0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas AMTE.L's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SUP.L's ROE is +0.39%, compared to AMTE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP.L is more volatile compared to AMTE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.L.
SUP.L vs MEL.L Comparison
SUP.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP.L stands at 234.6M. In comparison, MEL.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SUP.L is priced at £200.00, while MEL.L trades at £1,424.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas MEL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUP.L's ROE is +0.39%, compared to MEL.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP.L is more volatile compared to MEL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.L.