Sulzer Ltd
Sulzer Ltd (SULZF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SULZF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SULZF | $219.84 | +16.45% | 7.4B | 21.41 | $10.27 | +2.73% |
| RCIT | $2,262.50 | -0.06% | 295.8B | -226250.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| SMAWF | $278.67 | -3.89% | 229.8B | 25.77 | $11.31 | +2.23% |
| SIEGY | $141.90 | -1.71% | 221.9B | 25.17 | $5.65 | +1.60% |
| SBGSF | $305.01 | -1.31% | 172B | 32.04 | $9.55 | +0.92% |
| SBGSY | $61.10 | -1.10% | 171.8B | 31.94 | $1.91 | +1.35% |
| SMERY | $194.65 | -1.15% | 168.6B | 76.63 | $2.54 | N/A |
| SMEGF | $194.50 | -0.22% | 167.6B | 76.86 | $2.55 | N/A |
| SMNEY | $193.96 | +6.37% | 165.9B | 101.55 | $1.91 | N/A |
| WRTBY | $8.80 | +0.43% | 127.5B | 34.68 | $0.25 | +0.73% |
Stock Comparison
SULZF vs RCIT Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, RCIT has a market cap of 295.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while RCIT trades at $2,262.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas RCIT's P/E ratio is -226250.00. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RCIT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to RCIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check RCIT's competition here
SULZF vs SMAWF Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, SMAWF has a market cap of 229.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while SMAWF trades at $278.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas SMAWF's P/E ratio is 25.77. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SMAWF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to SMAWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check SMAWF's competition here
SULZF vs SIEGY Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, SIEGY has a market cap of 221.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while SIEGY trades at $141.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas SIEGY's P/E ratio is 25.17. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SIEGY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to SIEGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check SIEGY's competition here
SULZF vs SBGSF Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, SBGSF has a market cap of 172B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while SBGSF trades at $305.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas SBGSF's P/E ratio is 32.04. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SBGSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to SBGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check SBGSF's competition here
SULZF vs SBGSY Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, SBGSY has a market cap of 171.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while SBGSY trades at $61.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas SBGSY's P/E ratio is 31.94. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SBGSY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to SBGSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check SBGSY's competition here
SULZF vs SMERY Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, SMERY has a market cap of 168.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while SMERY trades at $194.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas SMERY's P/E ratio is 76.63. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SMERY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to SMERY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check SMERY's competition here
SULZF vs SMEGF Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, SMEGF has a market cap of 167.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while SMEGF trades at $194.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas SMEGF's P/E ratio is 76.86. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SMEGF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to SMEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check SMEGF's competition here
SULZF vs SMNEY Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, SMNEY has a market cap of 165.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while SMNEY trades at $193.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas SMNEY's P/E ratio is 101.55. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SMNEY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to SMNEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check SMNEY's competition here
SULZF vs WRTBY Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, WRTBY has a market cap of 127.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while WRTBY trades at $8.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas WRTBY's P/E ratio is 34.68. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WRTBY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to WRTBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check WRTBY's competition here
SULZF vs MHVYF Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, MHVYF has a market cap of 107.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while MHVYF trades at $32.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas MHVYF's P/E ratio is 60.40. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MHVYF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to MHVYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check MHVYF's competition here
SULZF vs ATLPF Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, ATLPF has a market cap of 107.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while ATLPF trades at $22.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas ATLPF's P/E ratio is 36.08. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ATLPF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and ATLPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ATLPF's competition here
SULZF vs ATLKY Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, ATLKY has a market cap of 104.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while ATLKY trades at $21.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas ATLKY's P/E ratio is 35.20. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ATLKY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to ATLKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check ATLKY's competition here
SULZF vs ATLCY Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, ATLCY has a market cap of 98.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while ATLCY trades at $18.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas ATLCY's P/E ratio is 30.36. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ATLCY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to ATLCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check ATLCY's competition here
SULZF vs ATLFF Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, ATLFF has a market cap of 85.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while ATLFF trades at $16.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas ATLFF's P/E ratio is 26.26. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ATLFF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to ATLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check ATLFF's competition here
SULZF vs KNYJY Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, KNYJY has a market cap of 77.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while KNYJY trades at $37.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas KNYJY's P/E ratio is 33.38. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KNYJY's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to KNYJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check KNYJY's competition here
SULZF vs AMDLY Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, AMDLY has a market cap of 76.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while AMDLY trades at $47.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas AMDLY's P/E ratio is 20.96. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AMDLY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and AMDLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AMDLY's competition here
SULZF vs SDVKF Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, SDVKF has a market cap of 53.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while SDVKF trades at $42.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas SDVKF's P/E ratio is 32.52. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SDVKF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and SDVKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SDVKF's competition here
SULZF vs SDVKY Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, SDVKY has a market cap of 53.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while SDVKY trades at $42.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas SDVKY's P/E ratio is 32.41. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SDVKY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to SDVKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check SDVKY's competition here
SULZF vs SHLAF Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, SHLAF has a market cap of 44.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while SHLAF trades at $410.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas SHLAF's P/E ratio is 34.02. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SHLAF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and SHLAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHLAF's competition here
SULZF vs WEGZY Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, WEGZY has a market cap of 43.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while WEGZY trades at $10.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas WEGZY's P/E ratio is 34.23. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WEGZY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to WEGZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check WEGZY's competition here
SULZF vs SHLRF Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, SHLRF has a market cap of 42.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while SHLRF trades at $362.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas SHLRF's P/E ratio is 29.92. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SHLRF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and SHLRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHLRF's competition here
SULZF vs FANUF Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, FANUF has a market cap of 39B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while FANUF trades at $39.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas FANUF's P/E ratio is 37.95. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FANUF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to FANUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check FANUF's competition here
SULZF vs FANUY Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, FANUY has a market cap of 38.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while FANUY trades at $20.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas FANUY's P/E ratio is 37.73. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FANUY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to FANUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check FANUY's competition here
SULZF vs KNYJF Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, KNYJF has a market cap of 36.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while KNYJF trades at $70.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas KNYJF's P/E ratio is 31.76. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KNYJF's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and KNYJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KNYJF's competition here
SULZF vs WEICF Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, WEICF has a market cap of 36.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while WEICF trades at $4.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas WEICF's P/E ratio is 20.78. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WEICF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to WEICF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check WEICF's competition here
SULZF vs SMCAY Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, SMCAY has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while SMCAY trades at $24.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas SMCAY's P/E ratio is 30.12. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SMCAY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to SMCAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check SMCAY's competition here
SULZF vs IHICY Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, IHICY has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while IHICY trades at $28.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas IHICY's P/E ratio is 35.92. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IHICY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to IHICY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check IHICY's competition here
SULZF vs SMECF Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, SMECF has a market cap of 30.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while SMECF trades at $477.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas SMECF's P/E ratio is 29.50. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SMECF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to SMECF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check SMECF's competition here
SULZF vs IHICF Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, IHICF has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while IHICF trades at $27.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas IHICF's P/E ratio is 35.44. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IHICF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and IHICF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IHICF's competition here
SULZF vs WRTBF Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, WRTBF has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while WRTBF trades at $43.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas WRTBF's P/E ratio is 34.52. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WRTBF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to WRTBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check WRTBF's competition here
SULZF vs VWSYF Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, VWSYF has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while VWSYF trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas VWSYF's P/E ratio is 27.47. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VWSYF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to VWSYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check VWSYF's competition here
SULZF vs VWDRY Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, VWDRY has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while VWDRY trades at $8.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas VWDRY's P/E ratio is 27.57. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VWDRY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to VWDRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check VWDRY's competition here
SULZF vs ALFVY Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, ALFVY has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while ALFVY trades at $58.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas ALFVY's P/E ratio is 26.01. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ALFVY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to ALFVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check ALFVY's competition here
SULZF vs ALFVF Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, ALFVF has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while ALFVF trades at $58.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas ALFVF's P/E ratio is 25.89. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ALFVF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and ALFVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALFVF's competition here
SULZF vs VACNY Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, VACNY has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while VACNY trades at $67.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas VACNY's P/E ratio is 69.03. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VACNY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to VACNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check VACNY's competition here
SULZF vs KWHIY Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, KWHIY has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while KWHIY trades at $46.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas KWHIY's P/E ratio is 30.85. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KWHIY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to KWHIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check KWHIY's competition here
SULZF vs KWHIF Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, KWHIF has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while KWHIF trades at $109.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas KWHIF's P/E ratio is 29.16. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KWHIF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to KWHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check KWHIF's competition here
SULZF vs EBCOF Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, EBCOF has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while EBCOF trades at $38.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas EBCOF's P/E ratio is 34.93. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EBCOF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to EBCOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check EBCOF's competition here
SULZF vs EBCOY Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, EBCOY has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while EBCOY trades at $18.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas EBCOY's P/E ratio is 33.67. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EBCOY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to EBCOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check EBCOY's competition here
SULZF vs NNDNF Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, NNDNF has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while NNDNF trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas NNDNF's P/E ratio is 20.90. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NNDNF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and NNDNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NNDNF's competition here
SULZF vs DAIUF Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, DAIUF has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while DAIUF trades at $41.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas DAIUF's P/E ratio is 31.24. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DAIUF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to DAIUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check DAIUF's competition here
SULZF vs DFKCY Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, DFKCY has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while DFKCY trades at $20.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas DFKCY's P/E ratio is 31.02. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DFKCY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to DFKCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check DFKCY's competition here
SULZF vs NJDCY Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, NJDCY has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while NJDCY trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas NJDCY's P/E ratio is 19.06. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NJDCY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to NJDCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check NJDCY's competition here
SULZF vs DNGFF Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, DNGFF has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while DNGFF trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas DNGFF's P/E ratio is 28.33. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DNGFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and DNGFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DNGFF's competition here
SULZF vs WEICY Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, WEICY has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while WEICY trades at $11.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas WEICY's P/E ratio is 15.86. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WEICY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and WEICY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WEICY's competition here
SULZF vs VTTGF Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, VTTGF has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while VTTGF trades at $463.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas VTTGF's P/E ratio is 48.06. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VTTGF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to VTTGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check VTTGF's competition here
SULZF vs GCTAF Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, GCTAF has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while GCTAF trades at $14.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas GCTAF's P/E ratio is -7.05. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GCTAF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and GCTAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GCTAF's competition here
SULZF vs GCTAY Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, GCTAY has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while GCTAY trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas GCTAY's P/E ratio is -8.99. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GCTAY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to GCTAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check GCTAY's competition here
SULZF vs GEAGF Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, GEAGF has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while GEAGF trades at $77.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas GEAGF's P/E ratio is 25.85. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GEAGF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and GEAGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GEAGF's competition here
SULZF vs WEGRY Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, WEGRY has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while WEGRY trades at $23.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas WEGRY's P/E ratio is 29.54. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WEGRY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to WEGRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check WEGRY's competition here
SULZF vs WEIGF Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, WEIGF has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while WEIGF trades at $46.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas WEIGF's P/E ratio is 28.44. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WEIGF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to WEIGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check WEIGF's competition here
SULZF vs MLSPF Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, MLSPF has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while MLSPF trades at $9.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas MLSPF's P/E ratio is 28.71. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MLSPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to MLSPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check MLSPF's competition here
SULZF vs SMGZY Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, SMGZY has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while SMGZY trades at $37.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas SMGZY's P/E ratio is 33.93. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SMGZY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to SMGZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check SMGZY's competition here
SULZF vs SMGKF Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, SMGKF has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while SMGKF trades at $35.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas SMGKF's P/E ratio is 33.20. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SMGKF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and SMGKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SMGKF's competition here
SULZF vs RTLLF Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, RTLLF has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while RTLLF trades at $869.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas RTLLF's P/E ratio is 32.65. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RTLLF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to RTLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check RTLLF's competition here
SULZF vs NRDXF Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, NRDXF has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while NRDXF trades at $40.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas NRDXF's P/E ratio is 75.91. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NRDXF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and NRDXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NRDXF's competition here
SULZF vs NRXXY Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, NRXXY has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while NRXXY trades at $20.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas NRXXY's P/E ratio is 75.56. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NRXXY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and NRXXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NRXXY's competition here
SULZF vs SIELF Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, SIELF has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while SIELF trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas SIELF's P/E ratio is 60.78. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SIELF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to SIELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check SIELF's competition here
SULZF vs RATIY Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, RATIY has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while RATIY trades at $40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas RATIY's P/E ratio is 30.08. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RATIY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and RATIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RATIY's competition here
SULZF vs YOKEY Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, YOKEY has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while YOKEY trades at $69.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas YOKEY's P/E ratio is 23.91. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to YOKEY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and YOKEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YOKEY's competition here
SULZF vs TBABF Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, TBABF has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while TBABF trades at $37.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas TBABF's P/E ratio is 23.21. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TBABF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to TBABF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check TBABF's competition here
SULZF vs YOKEF Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, YOKEF has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while YOKEF trades at $33.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas YOKEF's P/E ratio is 23.15. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to YOKEF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to YOKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check YOKEF's competition here
SULZF vs IMIAF Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, IMIAF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while IMIAF trades at $34.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas IMIAF's P/E ratio is 26.77. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IMIAF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and IMIAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IMIAF's competition here
SULZF vs XJNGF Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, XJNGF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while XJNGF trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas XJNGF's P/E ratio is 20.70. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to XJNGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to XJNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check XJNGF's competition here
SULZF vs SPXSY Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, SPXSY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while SPXSY trades at $52.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas SPXSY's P/E ratio is 35.31. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SPXSY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to SPXSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check SPXSY's competition here
SULZF vs SPXSF Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, SPXSF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while SPXSF trades at $105.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas SPXSF's P/E ratio is 35.39. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SPXSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to SPXSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check SPXSF's competition here
SULZF vs NGKIF Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, NGKIF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while NGKIF trades at $23.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas NGKIF's P/E ratio is 20.50. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NGKIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and NGKIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NGKIF's competition here
SULZF vs VLMTY Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, VLMTY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while VLMTY trades at $33.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas VLMTY's P/E ratio is 18.83. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VLMTY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to VLMTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check VLMTY's competition here
SULZF vs FCHRF Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, FCHRF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while FCHRF trades at $75.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas FCHRF's P/E ratio is 20.22. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FCHRF's ROE of +1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to FCHRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check FCHRF's competition here
SULZF vs VOYJF Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, VOYJF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while VOYJF trades at $32.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas VOYJF's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VOYJF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and VOYJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VOYJF's competition here
SULZF vs FLUIF Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, FLUIF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while FLUIF trades at $30.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas FLUIF's P/E ratio is 27.01. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FLUIF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to FLUIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check FLUIF's competition here
SULZF vs AMDWF Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, AMDWF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while AMDWF trades at $16.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas AMDWF's P/E ratio is 24.31. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AMDWF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and AMDWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AMDWF's competition here
SULZF vs FLIDF Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, FLIDF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while FLIDF trades at $93.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas FLIDF's P/E ratio is 24.56. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FLIDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and FLIDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FLIDF's competition here
SULZF vs FLIDY Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, FLIDY has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while FLIDY trades at $9.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas FLIDY's P/E ratio is 23.82. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FLIDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to FLIDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check FLIDY's competition here
SULZF vs JPSWY Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, JPSWY has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while JPSWY trades at $34.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas JPSWY's P/E ratio is 34.03. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JPSWY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to JPSWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check JPSWY's competition here
SULZF vs HSHIF Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, HSHIF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while HSHIF trades at $34.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas HSHIF's P/E ratio is 19.32. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HSHIF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to HSHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check HSHIF's competition here
SULZF vs HSHZY Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, HSHZY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while HSHZY trades at $8.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas HSHZY's P/E ratio is 18.53. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HSHZY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to HSHZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check HSHZY's competition here
SULZF vs BCHHF Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, BCHHF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while BCHHF trades at $444.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas BCHHF's P/E ratio is 15.48. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BCHHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and BCHHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BCHHF's competition here
SULZF vs YMATF Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, YMATF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while YMATF trades at $8.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas YMATF's P/E ratio is 16.81. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to YMATF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to YMATF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check YMATF's competition here
SULZF vs SOHVY Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, SOHVY has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while SOHVY trades at $9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas SOHVY's P/E ratio is 1.07. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SOHVY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and SOHVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SOHVY's competition here
SULZF vs HAIIF Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, HAIIF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while HAIIF trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas HAIIF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HAIIF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and HAIIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HAIIF's competition here
SULZF vs SFSLF Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, SFSLF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while SFSLF trades at $112.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas SFSLF's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SFSLF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and SFSLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SFSLF's competition here
SULZF vs AALBF Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, AALBF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while AALBF trades at $40.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas AALBF's P/E ratio is 24.98. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AALBF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and AALBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AALBF's competition here
SULZF vs KRNNF Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, KRNNF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while KRNNF trades at $134.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas KRNNF's P/E ratio is 16.28. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KRNNF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and KRNNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KRNNF's competition here
SULZF vs CYJBF Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, CYJBF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while CYJBF trades at $64.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas CYJBF's P/E ratio is 24.62. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CYJBF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to CYJBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check CYJBF's competition here
SULZF vs MICLF Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, MICLF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while MICLF trades at $21.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas MICLF's P/E ratio is 23.73. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MICLF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to MICLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check MICLF's competition here
SULZF vs ATSAF Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, ATSAF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while ATSAF trades at $44.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas ATSAF's P/E ratio is 37.82. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ATSAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and ATSAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ATSAF's competition here
SULZF vs RTOXF Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, RTOXF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while RTOXF trades at $4.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas RTOXF's P/E ratio is 30.47. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RTOXF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and RTOXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RTOXF's competition here
SULZF vs CYJBY Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, CYJBY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while CYJBY trades at $29.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas CYJBY's P/E ratio is 21.08. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CYJBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to CYJBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check CYJBY's competition here
SULZF vs NCTKY Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, NCTKY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while NCTKY trades at $15.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas NCTKY's P/E ratio is 46.80. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NCTKY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to NCTKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check NCTKY's competition here
SULZF vs THKLY Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, THKLY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while THKLY trades at $16.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas THKLY's P/E ratio is 55.86. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to THKLY's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to THKLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check THKLY's competition here
SULZF vs SOHVF Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, SOHVF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while SOHVF trades at $29.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas SOHVF's P/E ratio is 0.85. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SOHVF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to SOHVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check SOHVF's competition here
SULZF vs MRRLF Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, MRRLF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while MRRLF trades at $4.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas MRRLF's P/E ratio is 235.50. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MRRLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to MRRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check MRRLF's competition here
SULZF vs THKLF Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, THKLF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while THKLF trades at $31.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas THKLF's P/E ratio is 53.20. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to THKLF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to THKLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check THKLF's competition here
SULZF vs JGHAF Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, JGHAF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while JGHAF trades at $33.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas JGHAF's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JGHAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to JGHAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check JGHAF's competition here
SULZF vs NCTKF Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, NCTKF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while NCTKF trades at $27.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas NCTKF's P/E ratio is 42.14. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NCTKF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and NCTKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NCTKF's competition here
SULZF vs KUKAF Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, KUKAF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while KUKAF trades at $77.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas KUKAF's P/E ratio is 35.44. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KUKAF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and KUKAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KUKAF's competition here
SULZF vs FJTCY Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, FJTCY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while FJTCY trades at $35.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas FJTCY's P/E ratio is 28.10. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FJTCY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and FJTCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FJTCY's competition here
SULZF vs HSYDF Comparison February 2026
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 7.4B. In comparison, HSYDF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $219.84, while HSYDF trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.41, whereas HSYDF's P/E ratio is 91.77. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HSYDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to HSYDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check HSYDF's competition here