Sulzer Ltd
Sulzer Ltd (SULZF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SULZF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SULZF | $177.32 | +0.00% | 6B | 18.41 | $9.63 | +2.90% |
| SIEGY | $134.16 | +0.60% | 210.2B | 23.26 | $5.77 | +1.49% |
| SMAWF | $265.55 | -1.03% | 208.4B | 23.01 | $11.54 | +2.05% |
| SBGSF | $282.25 | -3.01% | 160.6B | 30.86 | $9.25 | +1.02% |
| SBGSY | $55.71 | -0.61% | 157B | 30.30 | $1.84 | +1.50% |
| RCIT | $2,218.54 | +55463400.00% | 138.1B | -221854.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| SMNEY | $114.93 | +0.76% | 91.3B | 459.08 | $0.25 | N/A |
| SMEGF | $111.63 | -2.93% | 88.8B | 465.14 | $0.24 | N/A |
| WRTBY | $5.77 | +7.25% | 84.9B | 26.23 | $0.22 | +1.41% |
| MHVYF | $24.60 | +0.88% | 83.9B | 51.02 | $0.49 | +0.62% |
Stock Comparison
SULZF vs SIEGY Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, SIEGY has a market cap of 210.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while SIEGY trades at $134.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas SIEGY's P/E ratio is 23.26. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SIEGY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to SIEGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check SIEGY's competition here
SULZF vs SMAWF Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, SMAWF has a market cap of 208.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while SMAWF trades at $265.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas SMAWF's P/E ratio is 23.01. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SMAWF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to SMAWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check SMAWF's competition here
SULZF vs SBGSF Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, SBGSF has a market cap of 160.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while SBGSF trades at $282.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas SBGSF's P/E ratio is 30.86. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SBGSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to SBGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check SBGSF's competition here
SULZF vs SBGSY Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, SBGSY has a market cap of 157B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while SBGSY trades at $55.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas SBGSY's P/E ratio is 30.30. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SBGSY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to SBGSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check SBGSY's competition here
SULZF vs RCIT Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, RCIT has a market cap of 138.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while RCIT trades at $2,218.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas RCIT's P/E ratio is -221854.00. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RCIT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to RCIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check RCIT's competition here
SULZF vs SMNEY Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, SMNEY has a market cap of 91.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while SMNEY trades at $114.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas SMNEY's P/E ratio is 459.08. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SMNEY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to SMNEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check SMNEY's competition here
SULZF vs SMEGF Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, SMEGF has a market cap of 88.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while SMEGF trades at $111.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas SMEGF's P/E ratio is 465.14. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SMEGF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to SMEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check SMEGF's competition here
SULZF vs WRTBY Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, WRTBY has a market cap of 84.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while WRTBY trades at $5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas WRTBY's P/E ratio is 26.23. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WRTBY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and WRTBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WRTBY's competition here
SULZF vs MHVYF Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, MHVYF has a market cap of 83.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while MHVYF trades at $24.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas MHVYF's P/E ratio is 51.02. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MHVYF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to MHVYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check MHVYF's competition here
SULZF vs ATLPF Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, ATLPF has a market cap of 75.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while ATLPF trades at $16.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas ATLPF's P/E ratio is 26.87. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ATLPF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to ATLPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check ATLPF's competition here
SULZF vs ATLFF Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, ATLFF has a market cap of 75.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while ATLFF trades at $14.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas ATLFF's P/E ratio is 23.84. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ATLFF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to ATLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check ATLFF's competition here
SULZF vs ATLKY Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, ATLKY has a market cap of 75.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while ATLKY trades at $15.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas ATLKY's P/E ratio is 26.62. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ATLKY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to ATLKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check ATLKY's competition here
SULZF vs ATLCY Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, ATLCY has a market cap of 73.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while ATLCY trades at $14.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas ATLCY's P/E ratio is 23.65. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ATLCY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to ATLCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check ATLCY's competition here
SULZF vs KNYJY Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, KNYJY has a market cap of 65.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while KNYJY trades at $31.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas KNYJY's P/E ratio is 28.62. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KNYJY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to KNYJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check KNYJY's competition here
SULZF vs SHLAF Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, SHLAF has a market cap of 39B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while SHLAF trades at $369.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas SHLAF's P/E ratio is 32.20. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SHLAF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and SHLAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHLAF's competition here
SULZF vs SHLRF Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, SHLRF has a market cap of 39B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while SHLRF trades at $358.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas SHLRF's P/E ratio is 31.20. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SHLRF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and SHLRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHLRF's competition here
SULZF vs SDVKY Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, SDVKY has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while SDVKY trades at $25.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas SDVKY's P/E ratio is 21.31. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SDVKY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to SDVKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check SDVKY's competition here
SULZF vs KNYJF Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, KNYJF has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while KNYJF trades at $61.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas KNYJF's P/E ratio is 27.74. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KNYJF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to KNYJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check KNYJF's competition here
SULZF vs SDVKF Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, SDVKF has a market cap of 31B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while SDVKF trades at $24.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas SDVKF's P/E ratio is 20.43. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SDVKF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and SDVKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SDVKF's competition here
SULZF vs FANUY Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, FANUY has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while FANUY trades at $15.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas FANUY's P/E ratio is 28.12. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FANUY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to FANUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check FANUY's competition here
SULZF vs FANUF Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, FANUF has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while FANUF trades at $30.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas FANUF's P/E ratio is 28.32. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FANUF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and FANUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FANUF's competition here
SULZF vs WEGZY Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, WEGZY has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while WEGZY trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas WEGZY's P/E ratio is 23.93. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WEGZY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to WEGZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check WEGZY's competition here
SULZF vs SMECF Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, SMECF has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while SMECF trades at $366.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas SMECF's P/E ratio is 22.94. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SMECF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to SMECF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check SMECF's competition here
SULZF vs SMCAY Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, SMCAY has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while SMCAY trades at $18.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas SMCAY's P/E ratio is 22.10. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SMCAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to SMCAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check SMCAY's competition here
SULZF vs NNDNF Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, NNDNF has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while NNDNF trades at $20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas NNDNF's P/E ratio is 20.40. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NNDNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to NNDNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check NNDNF's competition here
SULZF vs NJDCY Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, NJDCY has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while NJDCY trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas NJDCY's P/E ratio is 20.04. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NJDCY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to NJDCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check NJDCY's competition here
SULZF vs VWDRY Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, VWDRY has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while VWDRY trades at $6.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas VWDRY's P/E ratio is 29.73. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VWDRY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to VWDRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check VWDRY's competition here
SULZF vs VWSYF Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, VWSYF has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while VWSYF trades at $19.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas VWSYF's P/E ratio is 30.13. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VWSYF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to VWSYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check VWSYF's competition here
SULZF vs WEICF Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, WEICF has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while WEICF trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas WEICF's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WEICF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to WEICF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check WEICF's competition here
SULZF vs ALFVY Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, ALFVY has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while ALFVY trades at $44.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas ALFVY's P/E ratio is 21.92. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ALFVY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to ALFVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check ALFVY's competition here
SULZF vs IHICY Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, IHICY has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while IHICY trades at $27.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas IHICY's P/E ratio is 21.44. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IHICY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to IHICY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check IHICY's competition here
SULZF vs ALFVF Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, ALFVF has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while ALFVF trades at $38.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas ALFVF's P/E ratio is 19.80. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ALFVF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and ALFVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALFVF's competition here
SULZF vs IHICF Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, IHICF has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while IHICF trades at $99.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas IHICF's P/E ratio is 19.64. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IHICF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to IHICF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check IHICF's competition here
SULZF vs WEICY Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, WEICY has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while WEICY trades at $11.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas WEICY's P/E ratio is 15.86. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WEICY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and WEICY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WEICY's competition here
SULZF vs WRTBF Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, WRTBF has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while WRTBF trades at $22.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas WRTBF's P/E ratio is 19.96. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WRTBF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and WRTBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WRTBF's competition here
SULZF vs SIELF Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, SIELF has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while SIELF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas SIELF's P/E ratio is 36.85. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SIELF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and SIELF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SIELF's competition here
SULZF vs GCTAF Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, GCTAF has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while GCTAF trades at $14.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas GCTAF's P/E ratio is -7.05. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GCTAF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and GCTAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GCTAF's competition here
SULZF vs GCTAY Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, GCTAY has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while GCTAY trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas GCTAY's P/E ratio is -8.99. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GCTAY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to GCTAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check GCTAY's competition here
SULZF vs KWHIY Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, KWHIY has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while KWHIY trades at $29.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas KWHIY's P/E ratio is 20.61. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KWHIY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to KWHIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check KWHIY's competition here
SULZF vs KWHIF Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, KWHIF has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while KWHIF trades at $73.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas KWHIF's P/E ratio is 20.45. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KWHIF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and KWHIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KWHIF's competition here
SULZF vs VTTGF Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, VTTGF has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while VTTGF trades at $378.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas VTTGF's P/E ratio is 42.56. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VTTGF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and VTTGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VTTGF's competition here
SULZF vs VACNY Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, VACNY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while VACNY trades at $36.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas VACNY's P/E ratio is 40.85. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VACNY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to VACNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check VACNY's competition here
SULZF vs GEAGF Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, GEAGF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while GEAGF trades at $68.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas GEAGF's P/E ratio is 24.19. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GEAGF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and GEAGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GEAGF's competition here
SULZF vs RATIY Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, RATIY has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while RATIY trades at $46.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas RATIY's P/E ratio is 37.12. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RATIY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and RATIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RATIY's competition here
SULZF vs SMGZY Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, SMGZY has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while SMGZY trades at $31.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas SMGZY's P/E ratio is 26.43. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SMGZY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to SMGZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check SMGZY's competition here
SULZF vs DAIUF Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, DAIUF has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while DAIUF trades at $27.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas DAIUF's P/E ratio is 25.95. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DAIUF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and DAIUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DAIUF's competition here
SULZF vs SMGKF Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, SMGKF has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while SMGKF trades at $30.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas SMGKF's P/E ratio is 25.73. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SMGKF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and SMGKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SMGKF's competition here
SULZF vs RTLLF Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, RTLLF has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while RTLLF trades at $851.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas RTLLF's P/E ratio is 33.12. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RTLLF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to RTLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check RTLLF's competition here
SULZF vs DFKCY Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, DFKCY has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while DFKCY trades at $12.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas DFKCY's P/E ratio is 24.47. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DFKCY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to DFKCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check DFKCY's competition here
SULZF vs WEIGF Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, WEIGF has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while WEIGF trades at $36.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas WEIGF's P/E ratio is 22.32. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WEIGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and WEIGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WEIGF's competition here
SULZF vs WEGRY Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, WEGRY has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while WEGRY trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas WEGRY's P/E ratio is 21.78. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WEGRY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and WEGRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WEGRY's competition here
SULZF vs JPSWY Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, JPSWY has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while JPSWY trades at $31.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas JPSWY's P/E ratio is 37.47. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JPSWY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to JPSWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check JPSWY's competition here
SULZF vs MLSPF Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, MLSPF has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while MLSPF trades at $7.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas MLSPF's P/E ratio is -141.62. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MLSPF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to MLSPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check MLSPF's competition here
SULZF vs EBCOY Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, EBCOY has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while EBCOY trades at $9.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas EBCOY's P/E ratio is 17.83. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EBCOY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to EBCOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check EBCOY's competition here
SULZF vs TBABF Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, TBABF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while TBABF trades at $37.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas TBABF's P/E ratio is 23.06. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TBABF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and TBABF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TBABF's competition here
SULZF vs IMIAF Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, IMIAF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while IMIAF trades at $29.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas IMIAF's P/E ratio is 22.75. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IMIAF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and IMIAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IMIAF's competition here
SULZF vs VOYJF Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, VOYJF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while VOYJF trades at $35.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas VOYJF's P/E ratio is 21.61. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VOYJF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and VOYJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VOYJF's competition here
SULZF vs FCHRF Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, FCHRF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while FCHRF trades at $77.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas FCHRF's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FCHRF's ROE of +3.54%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to FCHRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check FCHRF's competition here
SULZF vs YOKEY Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, YOKEY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while YOKEY trades at $48.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas YOKEY's P/E ratio is 17.71. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to YOKEY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and YOKEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YOKEY's competition here
SULZF vs SPXSY Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, SPXSY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while SPXSY trades at $41.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas SPXSY's P/E ratio is 24.08. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SPXSY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to SPXSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check SPXSY's competition here
SULZF vs SPXSF Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, SPXSF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while SPXSF trades at $82.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas SPXSF's P/E ratio is 23.77. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SPXSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to SPXSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check SPXSF's competition here
SULZF vs VLMTY Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, VLMTY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while VLMTY trades at $32.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas VLMTY's P/E ratio is 20.25. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VLMTY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and VLMTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VLMTY's competition here
SULZF vs EBCOF Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, EBCOF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while EBCOF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas EBCOF's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EBCOF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and EBCOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EBCOF's competition here
SULZF vs XJNGF Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, XJNGF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while XJNGF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas XJNGF's P/E ratio is 13.14. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to XJNGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and XJNGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XJNGF's competition here
SULZF vs NRXXY Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, NRXXY has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while NRXXY trades at $11.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas NRXXY's P/E ratio is 138.75. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NRXXY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and NRXXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NRXXY's competition here
SULZF vs NRDXF Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, NRDXF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while NRDXF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas NRDXF's P/E ratio is 147.00. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NRDXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and NRDXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NRDXF's competition here
SULZF vs HAIIF Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, HAIIF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while HAIIF trades at $3.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas HAIIF's P/E ratio is 14.68. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HAIIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and HAIIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HAIIF's competition here
SULZF vs FLUIF Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, FLUIF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while FLUIF trades at $27.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas FLUIF's P/E ratio is 29.35. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FLUIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to FLUIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check FLUIF's competition here
SULZF vs BCHHF Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, BCHHF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while BCHHF trades at $495.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas BCHHF's P/E ratio is 17.76. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BCHHF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and BCHHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BCHHF's competition here
SULZF vs HSHZY Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, HSHZY has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while HSHZY trades at $8.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas HSHZY's P/E ratio is 19.39. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HSHZY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to HSHZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check HSHZY's competition here
SULZF vs YOKEF Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, YOKEF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while YOKEF trades at $19.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas YOKEF's P/E ratio is 16.19. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to YOKEF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and YOKEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YOKEF's competition here
SULZF vs YMATF Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, YMATF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while YMATF trades at $8.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas YMATF's P/E ratio is 16.89. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to YMATF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and YMATF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YMATF's competition here
SULZF vs HSHIF Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, HSHIF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while HSHIF trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas HSHIF's P/E ratio is 21.71. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HSHIF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to HSHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check HSHIF's competition here
SULZF vs DNGFF Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, DNGFF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while DNGFF trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas DNGFF's P/E ratio is 7.33. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DNGFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and DNGFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DNGFF's competition here
SULZF vs SFSLF Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, SFSLF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while SFSLF trades at $112.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas SFSLF's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SFSLF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and SFSLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SFSLF's competition here
SULZF vs KRNNF Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, KRNNF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while KRNNF trades at $134.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas KRNNF's P/E ratio is 16.28. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KRNNF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and KRNNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KRNNF's competition here
SULZF vs ATSAF Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, ATSAF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while ATSAF trades at $44.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas ATSAF's P/E ratio is 37.82. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ATSAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and ATSAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ATSAF's competition here
SULZF vs JGHAF Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, JGHAF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while JGHAF trades at $44.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas JGHAF's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JGHAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to JGHAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check JGHAF's competition here
SULZF vs AALBF Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, AALBF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while AALBF trades at $36.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas AALBF's P/E ratio is 22.90. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AALBF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and AALBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AALBF's competition here
SULZF vs NGKIF Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, NGKIF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while NGKIF trades at $12.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas NGKIF's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NGKIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and NGKIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NGKIF's competition here
SULZF vs FLIDF Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, FLIDF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while FLIDF trades at $62.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas FLIDF's P/E ratio is 19.33. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FLIDF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to FLIDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check FLIDF's competition here
SULZF vs MRRLF Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, MRRLF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while MRRLF trades at $4.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas MRRLF's P/E ratio is 235.50. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MRRLF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to MRRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check MRRLF's competition here
SULZF vs MICLF Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, MICLF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while MICLF trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas MICLF's P/E ratio is 22.91. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MICLF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and MICLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MICLF's competition here
SULZF vs FLIDY Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, FLIDY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while FLIDY trades at $6.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas FLIDY's P/E ratio is 18.97. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FLIDY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and FLIDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FLIDY's competition here
SULZF vs FJTCY Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, FJTCY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while FJTCY trades at $43.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas FJTCY's P/E ratio is 34.52. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FJTCY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to FJTCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check FJTCY's competition here
SULZF vs CYJBF Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, CYJBF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while CYJBF trades at $51.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas CYJBF's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CYJBF's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to CYJBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check CYJBF's competition here
SULZF vs RTOXF Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, RTOXF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while RTOXF trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas RTOXF's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RTOXF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and RTOXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RTOXF's competition here
SULZF vs THKLY Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, THKLY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while THKLY trades at $14.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas THKLY's P/E ratio is 58.65. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to THKLY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to THKLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check THKLY's competition here
SULZF vs KUKAF Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, KUKAF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while KUKAF trades at $77.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas KUKAF's P/E ratio is 35.44. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KUKAF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and KUKAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KUKAF's competition here
SULZF vs AMDWF Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, AMDWF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while AMDWF trades at $9.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas AMDWF's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AMDWF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to AMDWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check AMDWF's competition here
SULZF vs KRDXF Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, KRDXF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while KRDXF trades at $386.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas KRDXF's P/E ratio is 31.62. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KRDXF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and KRDXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KRDXF's competition here
SULZF vs SOHVF Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, SOHVF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while SOHVF trades at $23.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas SOHVF's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SOHVF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and SOHVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SOHVF's competition here
SULZF vs THKLF Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, THKLF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while THKLF trades at $21.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas THKLF's P/E ratio is 29.56. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to THKLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to THKLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check THKLF's competition here
SULZF vs SOHVY Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, SOHVY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while SOHVY trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas SOHVY's P/E ratio is 535.00. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SOHVY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF is less volatile compared to SOHVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULZF.Check SOHVY's competition here
SULZF vs MIURF Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, MIURF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while MIURF trades at $20.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas MIURF's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MIURF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and MIURF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MIURF's competition here
SULZF vs JGHHY Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, JGHHY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while JGHHY trades at $4.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas JGHHY's P/E ratio is 9.98. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JGHHY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and JGHHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JGHHY's competition here
SULZF vs SUZRY Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, SUZRY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while SUZRY trades at $13.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas SUZRY's P/E ratio is 73.22. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SUZRY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and SUZRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SUZRY's competition here
SULZF vs MLSYY Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, MLSYY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while MLSYY trades at $5.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas MLSYY's P/E ratio is -3.05. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MLSYY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and MLSYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MLSYY's competition here
SULZF vs IRRHF Comparison July 2025
SULZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULZF stands at 6B. In comparison, IRRHF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SULZF is priced at $177.32, while IRRHF trades at $2,389.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.41, whereas IRRHF's P/E ratio is 25.25. In terms of profitability, SULZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IRRHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SULZF and IRRHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IRRHF's competition here