Sula Vineyards Limited
Sula Vineyards Limited (SULA.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SULA.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SULA.NS | ₹162.69 | -0.93% | 13.4B | 44.39 | ₹3.57 | +2.27% |
| MCDOWELL-N.NS | ₹1,391.30 | -0.44% | 1T | 70.13 | ₹19.84 | +1.01% |
| UNITDSPR.NS | ₹1,268.20 | +1.55% | 909B | 51.58 | ₹24.23 | +1.12% |
| RADICO.BO | ₹2,793.00 | +1.13% | 364.1B | 70.54 | ₹38.55 | +0.15% |
| RADICO.NS | ₹2,792.70 | +1.10% | 363.8B | 66.91 | ₹40.61 | +0.15% |
| ABDL.NS | ₹509.40 | +11.43% | 130.5B | 48.70 | ₹9.58 | +0.77% |
| TI.BO | ₹428.65 | -1.31% | 85.2B | 73.73 | ₹5.73 | +0.24% |
| TI.NS | ₹428.55 | -1.29% | 85.2B | 74.08 | ₹5.70 | +0.24% |
| PICCADIL.NS | ₹570.05 | +1.18% | 54.9B | 38.46 | ₹14.48 | N/A |
| GLOBUSSPR.NS | ₹935.40 | -2.69% | 27.1B | 35.54 | ₹26.29 | +0.30% |
Stock Comparison
SULA.NS vs MCDOWELL-N.NS Comparison April 2026
SULA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULA.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, MCDOWELL-N.NS has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, SULA.NS is priced at ₹162.69, while MCDOWELL-N.NS trades at ₹1,391.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.39, whereas MCDOWELL-N.NS's P/E ratio is 70.13. In terms of profitability, SULA.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MCDOWELL-N.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SULA.NS is more volatile compared to MCDOWELL-N.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULA.NS.Check MCDOWELL-N.NS's competition here
SULA.NS vs UNITDSPR.NS Comparison April 2026
SULA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULA.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, UNITDSPR.NS has a market cap of 909B. Regarding current trading prices, SULA.NS is priced at ₹162.69, while UNITDSPR.NS trades at ₹1,268.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.39, whereas UNITDSPR.NS's P/E ratio is 51.58. In terms of profitability, SULA.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UNITDSPR.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SULA.NS is more volatile compared to UNITDSPR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULA.NS.Check UNITDSPR.NS's competition here
SULA.NS vs RADICO.BO Comparison April 2026
SULA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULA.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, RADICO.BO has a market cap of 364.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SULA.NS is priced at ₹162.69, while RADICO.BO trades at ₹2,793.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.39, whereas RADICO.BO's P/E ratio is 70.54. In terms of profitability, SULA.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RADICO.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SULA.NS is more volatile compared to RADICO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULA.NS.Check RADICO.BO's competition here
SULA.NS vs RADICO.NS Comparison April 2026
SULA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULA.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, RADICO.NS has a market cap of 363.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SULA.NS is priced at ₹162.69, while RADICO.NS trades at ₹2,792.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.39, whereas RADICO.NS's P/E ratio is 66.91. In terms of profitability, SULA.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RADICO.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SULA.NS is more volatile compared to RADICO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULA.NS.Check RADICO.NS's competition here
SULA.NS vs ABDL.NS Comparison April 2026
SULA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULA.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, ABDL.NS has a market cap of 130.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SULA.NS is priced at ₹162.69, while ABDL.NS trades at ₹509.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.39, whereas ABDL.NS's P/E ratio is 48.70. In terms of profitability, SULA.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ABDL.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SULA.NS is less volatile compared to ABDL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULA.NS.Check ABDL.NS's competition here
SULA.NS vs TI.BO Comparison April 2026
SULA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULA.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, TI.BO has a market cap of 85.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SULA.NS is priced at ₹162.69, while TI.BO trades at ₹428.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.39, whereas TI.BO's P/E ratio is 73.73. In terms of profitability, SULA.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TI.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SULA.NS is more volatile compared to TI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULA.NS.Check TI.BO's competition here
SULA.NS vs TI.NS Comparison April 2026
SULA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULA.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, TI.NS has a market cap of 85.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SULA.NS is priced at ₹162.69, while TI.NS trades at ₹428.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.39, whereas TI.NS's P/E ratio is 74.08. In terms of profitability, SULA.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TI.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SULA.NS is more volatile compared to TI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULA.NS.Check TI.NS's competition here
SULA.NS vs PICCADIL.NS Comparison April 2026
SULA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULA.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, PICCADIL.NS has a market cap of 54.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SULA.NS is priced at ₹162.69, while PICCADIL.NS trades at ₹570.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.39, whereas PICCADIL.NS's P/E ratio is 38.46. In terms of profitability, SULA.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PICCADIL.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SULA.NS is less volatile compared to PICCADIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULA.NS.Check PICCADIL.NS's competition here
SULA.NS vs GLOBUSSPR.NS Comparison April 2026
SULA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULA.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, GLOBUSSPR.NS has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SULA.NS is priced at ₹162.69, while GLOBUSSPR.NS trades at ₹935.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.39, whereas GLOBUSSPR.NS's P/E ratio is 35.54. In terms of profitability, SULA.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GLOBUSSPR.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SULA.NS is more volatile compared to GLOBUSSPR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULA.NS.Check GLOBUSSPR.NS's competition here
SULA.NS vs GLOBUSSPR.BO Comparison April 2026
SULA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULA.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, GLOBUSSPR.BO has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, SULA.NS is priced at ₹162.69, while GLOBUSSPR.BO trades at ₹935.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.39, whereas GLOBUSSPR.BO's P/E ratio is 35.44. In terms of profitability, SULA.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GLOBUSSPR.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SULA.NS is more volatile compared to GLOBUSSPR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULA.NS.Check GLOBUSSPR.BO's competition here
SULA.NS vs GMBREW.BO Comparison April 2026
SULA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULA.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, GMBREW.BO has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SULA.NS is priced at ₹162.69, while GMBREW.BO trades at ₹993.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.39, whereas GMBREW.BO's P/E ratio is 13.98. In terms of profitability, SULA.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GMBREW.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SULA.NS is more volatile compared to GMBREW.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULA.NS.Check GMBREW.BO's competition here
SULA.NS vs GMBREW.NS Comparison April 2026
SULA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULA.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, GMBREW.NS has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SULA.NS is priced at ₹162.69, while GMBREW.NS trades at ₹993.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.39, whereas GMBREW.NS's P/E ratio is 13.96. In terms of profitability, SULA.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GMBREW.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SULA.NS is more volatile compared to GMBREW.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULA.NS.Check GMBREW.NS's competition here
SULA.NS vs ASALCBR.NS Comparison April 2026
SULA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULA.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, ASALCBR.NS has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SULA.NS is priced at ₹162.69, while ASALCBR.NS trades at ₹882.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.39, whereas ASALCBR.NS's P/E ratio is 18.03. In terms of profitability, SULA.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ASALCBR.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SULA.NS is less volatile compared to ASALCBR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULA.NS.Check ASALCBR.NS's competition here
SULA.NS vs ASALCBR.BO Comparison April 2026
SULA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULA.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, ASALCBR.BO has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SULA.NS is priced at ₹162.69, while ASALCBR.BO trades at ₹881.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.39, whereas ASALCBR.BO's P/E ratio is 18.03. In terms of profitability, SULA.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ASALCBR.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SULA.NS is less volatile compared to ASALCBR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULA.NS.Check ASALCBR.BO's competition here
SULA.NS vs SULA.BO Comparison April 2026
SULA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULA.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, SULA.BO has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SULA.NS is priced at ₹162.69, while SULA.BO trades at ₹162.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.39, whereas SULA.BO's P/E ratio is 44.40. In terms of profitability, SULA.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SULA.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SULA.NS is less volatile compared to SULA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULA.NS.Check SULA.BO's competition here
SULA.NS vs BCLIND.BO Comparison April 2026
SULA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULA.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, BCLIND.BO has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SULA.NS is priced at ₹162.69, while BCLIND.BO trades at ₹32.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.39, whereas BCLIND.BO's P/E ratio is 8.03. In terms of profitability, SULA.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BCLIND.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SULA.NS is more volatile compared to BCLIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULA.NS.Check BCLIND.BO's competition here
SULA.NS vs IFBAGRO.BO Comparison April 2026
SULA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULA.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, IFBAGRO.BO has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SULA.NS is priced at ₹162.69, while IFBAGRO.BO trades at ₹860.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.39, whereas IFBAGRO.BO's P/E ratio is 17.16. In terms of profitability, SULA.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IFBAGRO.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SULA.NS is less volatile compared to IFBAGRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULA.NS.Check IFBAGRO.BO's competition here
SULA.NS vs IFBAGRO.NS Comparison April 2026
SULA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULA.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, IFBAGRO.NS has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SULA.NS is priced at ₹162.69, while IFBAGRO.NS trades at ₹861.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.39, whereas IFBAGRO.NS's P/E ratio is 17.12. In terms of profitability, SULA.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IFBAGRO.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SULA.NS is less volatile compared to IFBAGRO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULA.NS.Check IFBAGRO.NS's competition here
SULA.NS vs RKDL.BO Comparison April 2026
SULA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULA.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, RKDL.BO has a market cap of 495.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SULA.NS is priced at ₹162.69, while RKDL.BO trades at ₹21.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.39, whereas RKDL.BO's P/E ratio is 412.80. In terms of profitability, SULA.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RKDL.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SULA.NS is less volatile compared to RKDL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULA.NS.Check RKDL.BO's competition here
SULA.NS vs RKDL.NS Comparison April 2026
SULA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULA.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, RKDL.NS has a market cap of 492.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SULA.NS is priced at ₹162.69, while RKDL.NS trades at ₹21.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.39, whereas RKDL.NS's P/E ratio is 410.40. In terms of profitability, SULA.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RKDL.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SULA.NS is less volatile compared to RKDL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULA.NS.Check RKDL.NS's competition here
SULA.NS vs PIONDIST.NS Comparison April 2026
SULA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SULA.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, PIONDIST.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SULA.NS is priced at ₹162.69, while PIONDIST.NS trades at ₹183.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SULA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.39, whereas PIONDIST.NS's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, SULA.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PIONDIST.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SULA.NS is more volatile compared to PIONDIST.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SULA.NS.Check PIONDIST.NS's competition here