Suic Worldwide Holdings Ltd.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, IBM has a market cap of 231.64B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while IBM trades at $249.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas IBM's P/E ratio is 42.68. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to IBM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to IBM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, ACN has a market cap of 192.63B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while ACN trades at $307.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas ACN's P/E ratio is 25.39. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ACN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to ACN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, FISV has a market cap of 116.20B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while FISV trades at $114.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas FISV's P/E ratio is 29.67. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FISV's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to FISV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, FI has a market cap of 102.83B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while FI trades at $185.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas FI's P/E ratio is 32.88. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to FI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, INFY has a market cap of 74.00B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while INFY trades at $17.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas INFY's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to INFY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to INFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, FJTSY has a market cap of 39.08B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while FJTSY trades at $21.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas FJTSY's P/E ratio is 27.84. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FJTSY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to FJTSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, FJTSF has a market cap of 38.87B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while FJTSF trades at $21.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas FJTSF's P/E ratio is 27.68. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FJTSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to FJTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, CTSH has a market cap of 38.40B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while CTSH trades at $77.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas CTSH's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CTSH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to CTSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, IT has a market cap of 32.89B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while IT trades at $426.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas IT's P/E ratio is 26.67. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to IT's ROE of +1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to IT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, NIPNF has a market cap of 32.52B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while NIPNF trades at $24.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas NIPNF's P/E ratio is 26.52. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NIPNF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to NIPNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, WIT has a market cap of 30.34B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while WIT trades at $2.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas WIT's P/E ratio is 19.33. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to WIT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to WIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, NTDTY has a market cap of 29.08B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while NTDTY trades at $20.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas NTDTY's P/E ratio is 28.41. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NTDTY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to NTDTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, NTTDF has a market cap of 28.39B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while NTTDF trades at $20.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas NTTDF's P/E ratio is 27.74. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NTTDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to NTTDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, CAPMF has a market cap of 27.50B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while CAPMF trades at $161.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas CAPMF's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CAPMF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to CAPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, CGEMY has a market cap of 27.28B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while CGEMY trades at $32.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas CGEMY's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CGEMY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to CGEMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, BR has a market cap of 27.17B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while BR trades at $232.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas BR's P/E ratio is 34.86. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, GIB has a market cap of 23.62B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while GIB trades at $105.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas GIB's P/E ratio is 19.84. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GIB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to GIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, NURAF has a market cap of 22.73B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while NURAF trades at $39.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas NURAF's P/E ratio is 34.85. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NURAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to NURAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, NRILY has a market cap of 22.01B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while NRILY trades at $38.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas NRILY's P/E ratio is 33.75. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NRILY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to NRILY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, CDW has a market cap of 21.85B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while CDW trades at $165.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas CDW's P/E ratio is 20.81. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CDW's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to CDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, LDOS has a market cap of 18.97B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while LDOS trades at $147.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas LDOS's P/E ratio is 16.04. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to LDOS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to LDOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, AUROW has a market cap of 15.03B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while AUROW trades at $1.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas AUROW's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AUROW's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to AUROW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, WIZEY has a market cap of 14.39B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while WIZEY trades at $14.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas WIZEY's P/E ratio is 25.53. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to WIZEY's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to WIZEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, WPLCF has a market cap of 13.89B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while WPLCF trades at $13.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas WPLCF's P/E ratio is 24.64. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to WPLCF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to WPLCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, AUR has a market cap of 13.75B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while AUR trades at $7.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas AUR's P/E ratio is -16.91. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AUR's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to AUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, JKHY has a market cap of 12.56B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while JKHY trades at $172.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas JKHY's P/E ratio is 31.04. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to JKHY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to JKHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, CACI has a market cap of 10.16B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while CACI trades at $461.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas CACI's P/E ratio is 21.70. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CACI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to CACI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, EPAM has a market cap of 9.01B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while EPAM trades at $159.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas EPAM's P/E ratio is 20.30. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to EPAM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to EPAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, G has a market cap of 8.66B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while G trades at $49.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas G's P/E ratio is 17.38. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to G's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to G. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, KD has a market cap of 7.80B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while KD trades at $33.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas KD's P/E ratio is 57.81. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to KD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to KD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, EXLS has a market cap of 7.57B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while EXLS trades at $46.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas EXLS's P/E ratio is 35.26. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to EXLS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to EXLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, DLB has a market cap of 7.20B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while DLB trades at $74.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas DLB's P/E ratio is 28.31. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DLB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to DLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, WAY has a market cap of 7.09B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while WAY trades at $40.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas WAY's P/E ratio is -315.19. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to WAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to WAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, TISNF has a market cap of 6.85B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while TISNF trades at $29.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas TISNF's P/E ratio is 19.39. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TISNF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to TISNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, DTATF has a market cap of 6.75B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while DTATF trades at $43.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas DTATF's P/E ratio is 362.92. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DTATF's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to DTATF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, ISMAF has a market cap of 5.87B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while ISMAF trades at $33.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas ISMAF's P/E ratio is 18.64. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ISMAF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to ISMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, RPYTF has a market cap of 5.80B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while RPYTF trades at $155.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas RPYTF's P/E ratio is 23.99. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to RPYTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to RPYTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, SAIC has a market cap of 5.55B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while SAIC trades at $117.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas SAIC's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SAIC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to SAIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, DUSXF has a market cap of 5.53B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while DUSXF trades at $12.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas DUSXF's P/E ratio is 27.17. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DUSXF's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to DUSXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, BECTY has a market cap of 5.39B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while BECTY trades at $8.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas BECTY's P/E ratio is 19.45. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BECTY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to BECTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, GDS has a market cap of 5.38B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while GDS trades at $27.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas GDS's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GDS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to GDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, GLOB has a market cap of 5.19B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while GLOB trades at $117.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas GLOB's P/E ratio is 31.68. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GLOB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to GLOB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, BHTLF has a market cap of 4.74B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while BHTLF trades at $37.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas BHTLF's P/E ratio is 17.02. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BHTLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to BHTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, PAY has a market cap of 4.37B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while PAY trades at $34.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas PAY's P/E ratio is 97.63. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to PAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, INGM has a market cap of 4.33B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while INGM trades at $18.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas INGM's P/E ratio is 15.62. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to INGM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to INGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, AEXAY has a market cap of 4.28B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while AEXAY trades at $9.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas AEXAY's P/E ratio is 0.13. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AEXAY's ROE of +5.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to AEXAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, TSYHF has a market cap of 4.11B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while TSYHF trades at $1.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas TSYHF's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TSYHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to TSYHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, TSYHY has a market cap of 4.11B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while TSYHY trades at $14.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas TSYHY's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TSYHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to TSYHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, SPSAF has a market cap of 3.91B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while SPSAF trades at $199.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas SPSAF's P/E ratio is 11.58. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SPSAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to SPSAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, NCR has a market cap of 3.82B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while NCR trades at $27.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas NCR's P/E ratio is 49.24. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NCR's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to NCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, CNXC has a market cap of 3.22B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while CNXC trades at $50.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas CNXC's P/E ratio is 13.05. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CNXC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to CNXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, CD has a market cap of 3.10B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while CD trades at $8.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas CD's P/E ratio is 26.41. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to CD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, ISMAY has a market cap of 3.00B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while ISMAY trades at $17.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas ISMAY's P/E ratio is 19.20. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ISMAY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to ISMAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, CTLPP has a market cap of 2.92B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while CTLPP trades at $40.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas CTLPP's P/E ratio is 1333.33. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CTLPP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to CTLPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, CLVT has a market cap of 2.92B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while CLVT trades at $4.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas CLVT's P/E ratio is -4.41. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CLVT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to CLVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, DXC has a market cap of 2.88B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while DXC trades at $15.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas DXC's P/E ratio is -52.93. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DXC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to DXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, AI has a market cap of 2.84B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while AI trades at $22.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas AI's P/E ratio is -9.87. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AI's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to AI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, NWITY has a market cap of 2.78B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while NWITY trades at $5.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas NWITY's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NWITY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to NWITY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, PRFT has a market cap of 2.67B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while PRFT trades at $75.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas PRFT's P/E ratio is 36.34. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PRFT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to PRFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, NWKLF has a market cap of 2.62B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while NWKLF trades at $4.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas NWKLF's P/E ratio is 32.73. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NWKLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to NWKLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, WNS has a market cap of 2.60B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while WNS trades at $59.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas WNS's P/E ratio is 16.08. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to WNS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to WNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, NSSXF has a market cap of 2.58B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while NSSXF trades at $14.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas NSSXF's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NSSXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to NSSXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, ASGN has a market cap of 2.29B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while ASGN trades at $52.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas ASGN's P/E ratio is 50.59. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ASGN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to ASGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, SLNTY has a market cap of 2.16B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while SLNTY trades at $16.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas SLNTY's P/E ratio is 45.43. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SLNTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to SLNTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, NTCYF has a market cap of 1.99B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while NTCYF trades at $42.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas NTCYF's P/E ratio is 27.47. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NTCYF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to NTCYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, CFTLF has a market cap of 1.97B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while CFTLF trades at $0.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas CFTLF's P/E ratio is 27.03. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CFTLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to CFTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, NDTAF has a market cap of 1.93B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while NDTAF trades at $30.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas NDTAF's P/E ratio is -5.54. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NDTAF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to NDTAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, ATEAY has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while ATEAY trades at $6.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas ATEAY's P/E ratio is 21.63. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ATEAY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to ATEAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, LZMH has a market cap of 1.52B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while LZMH trades at $9.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas LZMH's P/E ratio is -999.00. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to LZMH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to LZMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, HLTEF has a market cap of 1.47B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while HLTEF trades at $64.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas HLTEF's P/E ratio is 22.15. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HLTEF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to HLTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, NYAX has a market cap of 1.46B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while NYAX trades at $40.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas NYAX's P/E ratio is -250.00. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NYAX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to NYAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, TWKS has a market cap of 1.45B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while TWKS trades at $4.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas TWKS's P/E ratio is -12.08. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TWKS's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to TWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, NCRRP has a market cap of 1.41B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while NCRRP trades at $1,100.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas NCRRP's P/E ratio is 941.02. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NCRRP's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to NCRRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, ATAZF has a market cap of 1.35B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while ATAZF trades at $12.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas ATAZF's P/E ratio is 19.29. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ATAZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to ATAZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, NABL has a market cap of 1.35B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while NABL trades at $7.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas NABL's P/E ratio is 44.75. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NABL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to NABL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, FORTY has a market cap of 1.33B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while FORTY trades at $87.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas FORTY's P/E ratio is 17.30. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FORTY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to FORTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, DLGEF has a market cap of 1.33B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while DLGEF trades at $29.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas DLGEF's P/E ratio is 33.01. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DLGEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to DLGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, TASK has a market cap of 1.24B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while TASK trades at $13.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas TASK's P/E ratio is 27.56. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TASK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to TASK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, INOD has a market cap of 1.23B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while INOD trades at $38.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas INOD's P/E ratio is 43.46. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to INOD's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to INOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, VYX has a market cap of 1.22B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while VYX trades at $8.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas VYX's P/E ratio is -5.87. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to VYX's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to VYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, FLYW has a market cap of 1.17B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while FLYW trades at $9.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas FLYW's P/E ratio is 486.00. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FLYW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to FLYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, APLD has a market cap of 1.16B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while APLD trades at $5.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas APLD's P/E ratio is -3.52. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to APLD's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to APLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, GDYN has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while GDYN trades at $13.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas GDYN's P/E ratio is 103.62. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GDYN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to GDYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, CCCMF has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while CCCMF trades at $35.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas CCCMF's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CCCMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to CCCMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, BBAI-WT has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while BBAI-WT trades at $0.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas BBAI-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BBAI-WT's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to BBAI-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, CRAYF has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while CRAYF trades at $11.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas CRAYF's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CRAYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to CRAYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, PSFE-WT has a market cap of 966.31M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while PSFE-WT trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas PSFE-WT's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PSFE-WT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to PSFE-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, NGRRF has a market cap of 956.40M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while NGRRF trades at $71.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas NGRRF's P/E ratio is 15.57. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NGRRF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to NGRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, SESPF has a market cap of 954.36M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while SESPF trades at $61.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas SESPF's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SESPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to SESPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, KSUEF has a market cap of 943.64M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while KSUEF trades at $32.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas KSUEF's P/E ratio is 14.99. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to KSUEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to KSUEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, KAHTY has a market cap of 936.71M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while KAHTY trades at $1.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas KAHTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to KAHTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to KAHTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, BBAI has a market cap of 927.94M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while BBAI trades at $3.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas BBAI's P/E ratio is -3.78. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BBAI's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to BBAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, PSFE has a market cap of 906.02M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while PSFE trades at $15.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas PSFE's P/E ratio is 42.42. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PSFE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to PSFE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, DTSOF has a market cap of 875.89M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while DTSOF trades at $24.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas DTSOF's P/E ratio is 17.52. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DTSOF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to DTSOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, ADSGF has a market cap of 835.11M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while ADSGF trades at $130.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas ADSGF's P/E ratio is 245.36. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ADSGF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to ADSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, CTSDF has a market cap of 814.12M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while CTSDF trades at $4.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas CTSDF's P/E ratio is -6.64. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CTSDF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to CTSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, AEXAF has a market cap of 773.81M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while AEXAF trades at $40.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas AEXAF's P/E ratio is 0.12. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AEXAF's ROE of +5.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to AEXAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, TRCLF has a market cap of 764.07M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while TRCLF trades at $20.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas TRCLF's P/E ratio is 9.76. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TRCLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to TRCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, CLVT-PA has a market cap of 755.51M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while CLVT-PA trades at $4.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas CLVT-PA's P/E ratio is -7.93. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CLVT-PA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to CLVT-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, HCKT has a market cap of 737.07M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while HCKT trades at $26.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas HCKT's P/E ratio is 25.39. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HCKT's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to HCKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, MGIC has a market cap of 672.66M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while MGIC trades at $13.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas MGIC's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MGIC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to MGIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, XRX has a market cap of 643.99M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while XRX trades at $5.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas XRX's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to XRX's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to XRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, CTLP has a market cap of 593.04M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while CTLP trades at $8.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas CTLP's P/E ratio is 42.74. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CTLP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to CTLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, DCHIF has a market cap of 551.03M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while DCHIF trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas DCHIF's P/E ratio is -18.50. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DCHIF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to DCHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, FDRVF has a market cap of 538.27M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while FDRVF trades at $24.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas FDRVF's P/E ratio is -22.97. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FDRVF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to FDRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, FDDMF has a market cap of 508.35M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while FDDMF trades at $4.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas FDDMF's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FDDMF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to FDDMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, GBDMF has a market cap of 488.93M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while GBDMF trades at $3.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas GBDMF's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GBDMF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to GBDMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, CMTUF has a market cap of 470.68M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while CMTUF trades at $14.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas CMTUF's P/E ratio is 23.43. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CMTUF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to CMTUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, DTTLY has a market cap of 347.49M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while DTTLY trades at $5.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas DTTLY's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DTTLY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to DTTLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, UIS has a market cap of 346.81M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while UIS trades at $4.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas UIS's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to UIS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to UIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, IBEX has a market cap of 340.09M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while IBEX trades at $25.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas IBEX's P/E ratio is 12.16. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to IBEX's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to IBEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, CNDT has a market cap of 338.22M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while CNDT trades at $2.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas CNDT's P/E ratio is 0.94. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CNDT's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to CNDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, VNET has a market cap of 311.49M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while VNET trades at $6.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas VNET's P/E ratio is 348.00. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to VNET's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to VNET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, SLUNF has a market cap of 304.15M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while SLUNF trades at $2.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas SLUNF's P/E ratio is -12.35. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SLUNF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to SLUNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, DMRC has a market cap of 296.07M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while DMRC trades at $13.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas DMRC's P/E ratio is -7.51. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DMRC's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to DMRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, SVPLF has a market cap of 279.77M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while SVPLF trades at $1.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas SVPLF's P/E ratio is -10.77. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SVPLF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to SVPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, CEJOF has a market cap of 264.48M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while CEJOF trades at $6.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas CEJOF's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CEJOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to CEJOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, CSYJF has a market cap of 262.72M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while CSYJF trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas CSYJF's P/E ratio is 12.40. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CSYJF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to CSYJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, SSCC has a market cap of 244.19M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while SSCC trades at $2.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas SSCC's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SSCC's ROE of -7.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to SSCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, CSYJY has a market cap of 240.18M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while CSYJY trades at $3.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas CSYJY's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CSYJY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to CSYJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, FCCN has a market cap of 230.18M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while FCCN trades at $3.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas FCCN's P/E ratio is -68.00. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FCCN's ROE of +20.64%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to FCCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, ITFRF has a market cap of 229.02M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while ITFRF trades at $8.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas ITFRF's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ITFRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to ITFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, EMCHF has a market cap of 226.38M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while EMCHF trades at $0.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas EMCHF's P/E ratio is 29.64. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to EMCHF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to EMCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, APMRF has a market cap of 224.50M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while APMRF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas APMRF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to APMRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to APMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, TLS has a market cap of 198.41M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while TLS trades at $2.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas TLS's P/E ratio is -3.63. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TLS's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to TLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, III has a market cap of 186.75M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while III trades at $3.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas III's P/E ratio is 64.50. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to III's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to III. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, PHLT has a market cap of 186.37M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while PHLT trades at $2.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas PHLT's P/E ratio is -18.31. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PHLT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to PHLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, TTEC has a market cap of 182.13M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while TTEC trades at $3.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas TTEC's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TTEC's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to TTEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, SRT has a market cap of 178.33M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while SRT trades at $4.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas SRT's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SRT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to SRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, TSSI has a market cap of 171.95M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while TSSI trades at $6.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas TSSI's P/E ratio is 28.63. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TSSI's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to TSSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, CTG has a market cap of 168.99M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while CTG trades at $10.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas CTG's P/E ratio is 350.00. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CTG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC and CTG have similar daily volatility (0.10).

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, ALVNF has a market cap of 167.69M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while ALVNF trades at $1.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas ALVNF's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ALVNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to ALVNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, CSPI has a market cap of 163.22M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while CSPI trades at $16.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas CSPI's P/E ratio is 826.00. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CSPI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to CSPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, LHSW has a market cap of 158.60M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while LHSW trades at $3.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas LHSW's P/E ratio is 61.00. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to LHSW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to LHSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, BULLZ has a market cap of 158.16M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while BULLZ trades at $3.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas BULLZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BULLZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to BULLZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, APPEF has a market cap of 157.84M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while APPEF trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas APPEF's P/E ratio is -6.64. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to APPEF's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to APPEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, GSDT has a market cap of 141.49M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while GSDT trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas GSDT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GSDT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to GSDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, APXYY has a market cap of 138.47M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while APXYY trades at $0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas APXYY's P/E ratio is -6.55. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to APXYY's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to APXYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, ULPRF has a market cap of 136.98M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while ULPRF trades at $24.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas ULPRF's P/E ratio is 19.15. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ULPRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to ULPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, ALYAF has a market cap of 129.10M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while ALYAF trades at $1.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas ALYAF's P/E ratio is -43.33. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ALYAF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to ALYAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, ALYA has a market cap of 110.31M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while ALYA trades at $1.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas ALYA's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ALYA's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to ALYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, QUISF has a market cap of 108.14M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while QUISF trades at $0.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas QUISF's P/E ratio is -19.51. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to QUISF's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to QUISF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, CNGFF has a market cap of 103.03M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while CNGFF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas CNGFF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CNGFF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to CNGFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, NOTE-WT has a market cap of 101.82M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while NOTE-WT trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas NOTE-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NOTE-WT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to NOTE-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, QSCGF has a market cap of 99.16M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while QSCGF trades at $0.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas QSCGF's P/E ratio is -15.92. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to QSCGF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to QSCGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, NOTE has a market cap of 97.63M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while NOTE trades at $0.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas NOTE's P/E ratio is 9.02. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NOTE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to NOTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, DCHIY has a market cap of 88.35M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while DCHIY trades at $1.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas DCHIY's P/E ratio is -12.36. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DCHIY's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to DCHIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, CTM has a market cap of 78.14M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while CTM trades at $0.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas CTM's P/E ratio is -5.11. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CTM's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to CTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, SAIH has a market cap of 66.67M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while SAIH trades at $6.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas SAIH's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SAIH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to SAIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, KDCXF has a market cap of 64.54M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while KDCXF trades at $1.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas KDCXF's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to KDCXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to KDCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, DVLT has a market cap of 59.59M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while DVLT trades at $0.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas DVLT's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DVLT's ROE of -2.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to DVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, EAXR has a market cap of 56.67M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while EAXR trades at $0.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas EAXR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to EAXR's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to EAXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, HLEO has a market cap of 56.32M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while HLEO trades at $5.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas HLEO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HLEO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to HLEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, VEEA has a market cap of 55.75M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while VEEA trades at $1.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas VEEA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to VEEA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to VEEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, SDHIU has a market cap of 54.00M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while SDHIU trades at $10.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas SDHIU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SDHIU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to SDHIU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, CXGEF has a market cap of 53.53M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while CXGEF trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas CXGEF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CXGEF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to CXGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, WYY has a market cap of 49.70M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while WYY trades at $5.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas WYY's P/E ratio is -24.19. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to WYY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to WYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, GMM has a market cap of 45.38M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while GMM trades at $2.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas GMM's P/E ratio is 0.41. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GMM's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to GMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, USIO has a market cap of 41.10M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while USIO trades at $1.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas USIO's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to USIO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to USIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, SEBFF has a market cap of 38.12M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while SEBFF trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas SEBFF's P/E ratio is -5.43. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SEBFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to SEBFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, MASK has a market cap of 36.18M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while MASK trades at $3.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas MASK's P/E ratio is 23.07. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MASK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to MASK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, GLE has a market cap of 32.02M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while GLE trades at $1.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas GLE's P/E ratio is 87.50. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GLE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to GLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, SNELF has a market cap of 28.58M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while SNELF trades at $5.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas SNELF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SNELF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to SNELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, BTCM has a market cap of 27.76M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while BTCM trades at $1.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas BTCM's P/E ratio is -1.74. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BTCM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to BTCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, CLPS has a market cap of 26.75M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while CLPS trades at $0.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas CLPS's P/E ratio is -24.02. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CLPS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to CLPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, DTST has a market cap of 25.33M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while DTST trades at $3.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas DTST's P/E ratio is 51.00. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DTST's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to DTST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, BNXAF has a market cap of 25.18M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while BNXAF trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas BNXAF's P/E ratio is -19.87. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BNXAF's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to BNXAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, MLBEF has a market cap of 25.06M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while MLBEF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas MLBEF's P/E ratio is -1.68. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MLBEF's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to MLBEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, ARBB has a market cap of 17.98M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while ARBB trades at $0.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas ARBB's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ARBB's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to ARBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, SPOFF has a market cap of 15.85M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while SPOFF trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas SPOFF's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SPOFF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to SPOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, CYCU has a market cap of 14.46M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while CYCU trades at $0.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas CYCU's P/E ratio is 4.60. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CYCU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to CYCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, JDZG has a market cap of 14.18M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while JDZG trades at $0.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas JDZG's P/E ratio is 19.27. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to JDZG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to JDZG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, POSAF has a market cap of 11.57M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while POSAF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas POSAF's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to POSAF's ROE of -2.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to POSAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, SGLB has a market cap of 11.31M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while SGLB trades at $1.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas SGLB's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SGLB's ROE of +43.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to SGLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, KTHGF has a market cap of 11.25M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while KTHGF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas KTHGF's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to KTHGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to KTHGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, XTMIF has a market cap of 8.13M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while XTMIF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas XTMIF's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to XTMIF's ROE of +1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to XTMIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, BRQSF has a market cap of 6.41M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while BRQSF trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas BRQSF's P/E ratio is 0.48. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BRQSF's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to BRQSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, KNRLF has a market cap of 6.22M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while KNRLF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas KNRLF's P/E ratio is 0.74. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to KNRLF's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to KNRLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, FUUN has a market cap of 5.36M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while FUUN trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas FUUN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FUUN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to FUUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, DCSX has a market cap of 5.19M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while DCSX trades at $2.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas DCSX's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DCSX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to DCSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, CPIHF has a market cap of 3.94M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while CPIHF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas CPIHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CPIHF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to CPIHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, SASI has a market cap of 3.89M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while SASI trades at $4.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas SASI's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SASI's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to SASI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, DRGV has a market cap of 3.68M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while DRGV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas DRGV's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DRGV's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to DRGV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, NOSUF has a market cap of 3.04M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while NOSUF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas NOSUF's P/E ratio is -3.40. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NOSUF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to NOSUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, VSSSF has a market cap of 2.95M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while VSSSF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas VSSSF's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to VSSSF's ROE of +25.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to VSSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, VEEAW has a market cap of 2.78M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while VEEAW trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas VEEAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to VEEAW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to VEEAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, SEAV has a market cap of 2.78M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while SEAV trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas SEAV's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SEAV's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to SEAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, SKTCF has a market cap of 2.75M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while SKTCF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas SKTCF's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SKTCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to SKTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, CRCW has a market cap of 2.27M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while CRCW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas CRCW's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CRCW's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to CRCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, SNOIF has a market cap of 2.17M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while SNOIF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas SNOIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SNOIF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to SNOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, DTSTW has a market cap of 2.13M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while DTSTW trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas DTSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DTSTW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to DTSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, WAVD has a market cap of 2.13M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while WAVD trades at $3.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas WAVD's P/E ratio is -1.58. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to WAVD's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to WAVD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, MOBIF has a market cap of 1.92M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while MOBIF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas MOBIF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MOBIF's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to MOBIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, CATG has a market cap of 1.91M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while CATG trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas CATG's P/E ratio is 1.52. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CATG's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to CATG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, TDTH has a market cap of 1.73M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while TDTH trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas TDTH's P/E ratio is -1.82. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TDTH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to TDTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, GTCH has a market cap of 1.68M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while GTCH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas GTCH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GTCH's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to GTCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, DTMXF has a market cap of 1.67M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while DTMXF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas DTMXF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DTMXF's ROE of -5.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to DTMXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, MOOIF has a market cap of 1.55M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while MOOIF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas MOOIF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MOOIF's ROE of +18.83%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to MOOIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, SFWJ has a market cap of 1.49M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while SFWJ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas SFWJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SFWJ's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to SFWJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, CYCUW has a market cap of 1.48M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while CYCUW trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas CYCUW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CYCUW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to CYCUW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, SSFT has a market cap of 1.37M. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while SSFT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas SSFT's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SSFT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to SSFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, JFU has a market cap of 853564.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while JFU trades at $1.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas JFU's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to JFU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to JFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, VEII has a market cap of 696013.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while VEII trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas VEII's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to VEII's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to VEII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, NFTFF has a market cap of 685285.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while NFTFF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas NFTFF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NFTFF's ROE of -2.58%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to NFTFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, SDVI has a market cap of 674664.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while SDVI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas SDVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SDVI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to SDVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, AGILQ has a market cap of 581689.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while AGILQ trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas AGILQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AGILQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to AGILQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, UTRX has a market cap of 489638.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while UTRX trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas UTRX's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to UTRX's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to UTRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, TRIRW has a market cap of 397925.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while TRIRW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas TRIRW's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TRIRW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to TRIRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, WYLDF has a market cap of 340019.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while WYLDF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas WYLDF's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to WYLDF's ROE of +6.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to WYLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, ESYL has a market cap of 317805.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while ESYL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas ESYL's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ESYL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to ESYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, HMNY has a market cap of 300139.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while HMNY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas HMNY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HMNY's ROE of +11.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to HMNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, SLLN has a market cap of 272904.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while SLLN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas SLLN's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SLLN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to SLLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, ROKK has a market cap of 272428.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while ROKK trades at $0.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas ROKK's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ROKK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to ROKK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, DYNE has a market cap of 232936.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while DYNE trades at $11.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas DYNE's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DYNE's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to DYNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, DIGAF has a market cap of 168217.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while DIGAF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas DIGAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DIGAF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to DIGAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, CBRI has a market cap of 163292.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while CBRI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas CBRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CBRI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to CBRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, SAIHW has a market cap of 139970.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while SAIHW trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas SAIHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SAIHW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to SAIHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, ZWBC has a market cap of 134886.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while ZWBC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas ZWBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ZWBC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to ZWBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, APQT has a market cap of 108108.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while APQT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas APQT's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to APQT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to APQT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, HUBV has a market cap of 101820.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while HUBV trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas HUBV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HUBV's ROE of -4.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to HUBV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, CLTS has a market cap of 99989.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while CLTS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas CLTS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CLTS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to CLTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, ICLD has a market cap of 95702.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while ICLD trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas ICLD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ICLD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to ICLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, ADGL has a market cap of 95638.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while ADGL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas ADGL's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ADGL's ROE of -4.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to ADGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, ALYI has a market cap of 93379.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while ALYI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas ALYI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ALYI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to ALYI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, RCMH has a market cap of 84453.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while RCMH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas RCMH's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to RCMH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to RCMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, IPSI has a market cap of 73897.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while IPSI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas IPSI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to IPSI's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to IPSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, XALL has a market cap of 57390.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while XALL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas XALL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to XALL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to XALL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, DVRNF has a market cap of 54091.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while DVRNF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas DVRNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DVRNF's ROE of +2.78%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to DVRNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, WCIG has a market cap of 49979.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while WCIG trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas WCIG's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to WCIG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to WCIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, RGGI has a market cap of 45979.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while RGGI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas RGGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to RGGI's ROE of +2.69%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to RGGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, INIX has a market cap of 40485.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while INIX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas INIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to INIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to INIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, GSPH has a market cap of 37091.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while GSPH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas GSPH's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GSPH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to GSPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, YIPI has a market cap of 29790.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while YIPI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas YIPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to YIPI's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to YIPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, HWNI has a market cap of 21137.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while HWNI trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas HWNI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HWNI's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to HWNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, EMRH has a market cap of 10100.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while EMRH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas EMRH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to EMRH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to EMRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, CMPY has a market cap of 6671.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while CMPY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas CMPY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CMPY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to CMPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, TPPPF has a market cap of 6094.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while TPPPF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas TPPPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TPPPF's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to TPPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, FCTI has a market cap of 5522.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while FCTI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas FCTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FCTI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to FCTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, ENHT has a market cap of 5238.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while ENHT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas ENHT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ENHT's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to ENHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, PGFY has a market cap of 5010.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while PGFY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas PGFY's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PGFY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to PGFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, HZHI has a market cap of 4973.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while HZHI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas HZHI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HZHI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to HZHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, NDVNQ has a market cap of 4759.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while NDVNQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas NDVNQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NDVNQ's ROE of +5.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to NDVNQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, DGIF has a market cap of 4340.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while DGIF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas DGIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DGIF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to DGIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, THDS has a market cap of 3713.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while THDS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas THDS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to THDS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to THDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, CCTR has a market cap of 2977.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while CCTR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas CCTR's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CCTR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to CCTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, CKYS has a market cap of 2000.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while CKYS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas CKYS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CKYS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to CKYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, OTFT has a market cap of 1737.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while OTFT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas OTFT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to OTFT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to OTFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, EXCC has a market cap of 1025.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while EXCC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas EXCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to EXCC's ROE of +1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to EXCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, PRZM has a market cap of 1007.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while PRZM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas PRZM's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PRZM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to PRZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, PRLO has a market cap of 730.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while PRLO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas PRLO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PRLO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to PRLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, SCNTQ has a market cap of 661.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while SCNTQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas SCNTQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SCNTQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to SCNTQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, RTNB has a market cap of 610.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while RTNB trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas RTNB's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to RTNB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to RTNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, VBTC has a market cap of 528.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while VBTC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas VBTC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to VBTC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to VBTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, USDC has a market cap of 371.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while USDC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas USDC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to USDC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to USDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, BETSF has a market cap of 312.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while BETSF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas BETSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BETSF's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to BETSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, TSCC has a market cap of 300.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while TSCC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas TSCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TSCC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to TSCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, BTSR has a market cap of 210.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while BTSR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas BTSR's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BTSR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to BTSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, ITTOF has a market cap of 171.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while ITTOF trades at $28.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas ITTOF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ITTOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to ITTOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, ITTOY has a market cap of 150.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while ITTOY trades at $12.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas ITTOY's P/E ratio is 26.60. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ITTOY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to ITTOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, DPFD has a market cap of 114.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while DPFD trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas DPFD's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DPFD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to DPFD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, IMCI has a market cap of 104.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while IMCI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas IMCI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to IMCI's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to IMCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, NONEY has a market cap of 100.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while NONEY trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas NONEY's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NONEY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to NONEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, SEVM has a market cap of 90.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while SEVM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas SEVM's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SEVM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to SEVM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, NONEF has a market cap of 84.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while NONEF trades at $27.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas NONEF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NONEF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to NONEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, ATHC has a market cap of 75.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while ATHC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas ATHC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ATHC's ROE of -6.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to ATHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, NNSCF has a market cap of 46.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while NNSCF trades at $15.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas NNSCF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NNSCF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to NNSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, HYDN has a market cap of 39.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while HYDN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas HYDN's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HYDN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to HYDN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, SFBTF has a market cap of 35.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while SFBTF trades at $17.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas SFBTF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SFBTF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to SFBTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, SYKE comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while SYKE trades at $54.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas SYKE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SYKE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to SYKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, CRGE comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while CRGE trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas CRGE's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CRGE's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to CRGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, PCPJ comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while PCPJ trades at $0.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas PCPJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PCPJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to PCPJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, CCRC comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while CCRC trades at $6.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas CCRC's P/E ratio is 4.79. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CCRC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to CCRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, GDYNW comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while GDYNW trades at $14.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas GDYNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GDYNW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to GDYNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, TRIT comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while TRIT trades at $1.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas TRIT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TRIT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to TRIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, CYXT comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while CYXT trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas CYXT's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CYXT's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to CYXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, CNLK comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while CNLK trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas CNLK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CNLK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to CNLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, FCCND comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while FCCND trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas FCCND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FCCND's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to FCCND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, CSVI comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while CSVI trades at $57.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas CSVI's P/E ratio is 26.47. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CSVI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to CSVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, BLFDF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while BLFDF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas BLFDF's P/E ratio is 2.80. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BLFDF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to BLFDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, AVCT comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while AVCT trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas AVCT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AVCT's ROE of -4.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to AVCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, SREV comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while SREV trades at $1.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas SREV's P/E ratio is -14.42. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SREV's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to SREV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, SWCH comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while SWCH trades at $34.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas SWCH's P/E ratio is 796.51. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SWCH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to SWCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, ACZT comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while ACZT trades at $0.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas ACZT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ACZT's ROE of -70.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to ACZT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, CTEK comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while CTEK trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas CTEK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CTEK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is less volatile compared to CTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.

SUIC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUIC stands at 6.84M. In comparison, REKRW comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SUIC is priced at $0.60, while REKRW trades at $17.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUIC currently has a P/E ratio of -60.00, whereas REKRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUIC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to REKRW's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SUIC is more volatile compared to REKRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUIC.