iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF
iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF (SUB) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SUB) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Bonds Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUB | $106.65 | +0.04% | 9.9B | N/A | N/A | +2.24% |
| VBMPX | $9.60 | +0.00% | 359.8B | N/A | N/A | +3.81% |
| VBMFX | $9.60 | +0.00% | 359.8B | N/A | N/A | +3.68% |
| VBTIX | $9.60 | +0.00% | 359.8B | N/A | N/A | +3.78% |
| VBTLX | $9.60 | +0.00% | 359.8B | N/A | N/A | +3.80% |
| BND | $73.21 | +0.12% | 359.4B | N/A | N/A | +3.78% |
| VTBNX | $9.47 | +0.00% | 317.3B | N/A | N/A | +3.87% |
| BNDX | $49.31 | +0.12% | 106.3B | N/A | N/A | +4.32% |
| VTABX | $19.72 | +0.20% | 105.9B | N/A | N/A | +4.30% |
| VTIFX | $29.59 | +0.17% | 105.9B | N/A | N/A | +4.33% |
Stock Comparison
SUB vs VBMPX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, VBMPX has a market cap of 359.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while VBMPX trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VBMPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to VBMPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to VBMPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check VBMPX's competition here
SUB vs VBMFX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, VBMFX has a market cap of 359.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while VBMFX trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VBMFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to VBMFX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to VBMFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check VBMFX's competition here
SUB vs VBTIX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, VBTIX has a market cap of 359.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while VBTIX trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VBTIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to VBTIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to VBTIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check VBTIX's competition here
SUB vs VBTLX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, VBTLX has a market cap of 359.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while VBTLX trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VBTLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to VBTLX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to VBTLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check VBTLX's competition here
SUB vs BND Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, BND has a market cap of 359.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while BND trades at $73.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to BND's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is less volatile compared to BND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check BND's competition here
SUB vs VTBNX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, VTBNX has a market cap of 317.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while VTBNX trades at $9.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTBNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to VTBNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to VTBNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check VTBNX's competition here
SUB vs BNDX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, BNDX has a market cap of 106.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while BNDX trades at $49.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to BNDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is less volatile compared to BNDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check BNDX's competition here
SUB vs VTABX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, VTABX has a market cap of 105.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while VTABX trades at $19.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTABX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to VTABX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to VTABX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check VTABX's competition here
SUB vs VTIFX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, VTIFX has a market cap of 105.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while VTIFX trades at $29.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTIFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to VTIFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to VTIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check VTIFX's competition here
SUB vs BFAFX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, BFAFX has a market cap of 94B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while BFAFX trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BFAFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to BFAFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to BFAFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check BFAFX's competition here
SUB vs FXNAX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, FXNAX has a market cap of 64.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while FXNAX trades at $10.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FXNAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to FXNAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to FXNAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check FXNAX's competition here
SUB vs VBIRX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, VBIRX has a market cap of 64.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while VBIRX trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VBIRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to VBIRX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to VBIRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check VBIRX's competition here
SUB vs VICSX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, VICSX has a market cap of 57B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while VICSX trades at $22.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VICSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to VICSX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to VICSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check VICSX's competition here
SUB vs VCIT Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, VCIT has a market cap of 56.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while VCIT trades at $82.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VCIT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to VCIT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is less volatile compared to VCIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check VCIT's competition here
SUB vs BAGIX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, BAGIX has a market cap of 53.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while BAGIX trades at $9.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BAGIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to BAGIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to BAGIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check BAGIX's competition here
SUB vs BAGSX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, BAGSX has a market cap of 53.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while BAGSX trades at $10.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BAGSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to BAGSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to BAGSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check BAGSX's competition here
SUB vs WOBDX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, WOBDX has a market cap of 49.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while WOBDX trades at $10.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WOBDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to WOBDX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to WOBDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check WOBDX's competition here
SUB vs JCBZX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, JCBZX has a market cap of 49.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while JCBZX trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JCBZX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to JCBZX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to JCBZX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check JCBZX's competition here
SUB vs SGOV Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, SGOV has a market cap of 49.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while SGOV trades at $100.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to SGOV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to SGOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check SGOV's competition here
SUB vs TLT Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, TLT has a market cap of 47.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while TLT trades at $86.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLT's P/E ratio is -6.82. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to TLT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is less volatile compared to TLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check TLT's competition here
SUB vs VBILX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, VBILX has a market cap of 45.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while VBILX trades at $10.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VBILX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to VBILX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to VBILX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check VBILX's competition here
SUB vs BIV Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, BIV has a market cap of 45B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while BIV trades at $76.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to BIV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is less volatile compared to BIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check BIV's competition here
SUB vs VSCSX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, VSCSX has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while VSCSX trades at $21.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSCSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to VSCSX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to VSCSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check VSCSX's competition here
SUB vs VCSH Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, VCSH has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while VCSH trades at $79.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VCSH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to VCSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is less volatile compared to VCSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check VCSH's competition here
SUB vs VTEAX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, VTEAX has a market cap of 40.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while VTEAX trades at $19.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTEAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to VTEAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to VTEAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check VTEAX's competition here
SUB vs FTBFX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, FTBFX has a market cap of 39.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while FTBFX trades at $9.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTBFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to FTBFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to FTBFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check FTBFX's competition here
SUB vs BCOIX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, BCOIX has a market cap of 38.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while BCOIX trades at $10.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCOIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to BCOIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to BCOIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check BCOIX's competition here
SUB vs BCOSX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, BCOSX has a market cap of 38.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while BCOSX trades at $10.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCOSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to BCOSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to BCOSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check BCOSX's competition here
SUB vs IEF Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, IEF has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while IEF trades at $94.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEF's P/E ratio is -22.15. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to IEF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is less volatile compared to IEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check IEF's competition here
SUB vs IUSB Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, IUSB has a market cap of 33B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while IUSB trades at $46.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSB's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to IUSB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is less volatile compared to IUSB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check IUSB's competition here
SUB vs MWTRX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, MWTRX has a market cap of 32.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while MWTRX trades at $9.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MWTRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to MWTRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to MWTRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check MWTRX's competition here
SUB vs MWTIX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, MWTIX has a market cap of 32.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while MWTIX trades at $9.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MWTIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to MWTIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to MWTIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check MWTIX's competition here
SUB vs MWTSX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, MWTSX has a market cap of 32.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while MWTSX trades at $8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MWTSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to MWTSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to MWTSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check MWTSX's competition here
SUB vs LQD Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, LQD has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while LQD trades at $109.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LQD's P/E ratio is 32.89. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to LQD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is less volatile compared to LQD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check LQD's competition here
SUB vs DLTNX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, DLTNX has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while DLTNX trades at $8.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DLTNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to DLTNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to DLTNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check DLTNX's competition here
SUB vs DBLTX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, DBLTX has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while DBLTX trades at $8.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBLTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to DBLTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to DBLTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check DBLTX's competition here
SUB vs GIBRX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, GIBRX has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while GIBRX trades at $23.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIBRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to GIBRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to GIBRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check GIBRX's competition here
SUB vs GIBIX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, GIBIX has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while GIBIX trades at $23.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIBIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to GIBIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to GIBIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check GIBIX's competition here
SUB vs GIBAX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, GIBAX has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while GIBAX trades at $23.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIBAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to GIBAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to GIBAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check GIBAX's competition here
SUB vs GIBCX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, GIBCX has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while GIBCX trades at $23.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIBCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to GIBCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to GIBCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check GIBCX's competition here
SUB vs GIBLX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, GIBLX has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while GIBLX trades at $23.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIBLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to GIBLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to GIBLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check GIBLX's competition here
SUB vs PTRQX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, PTRQX has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while PTRQX trades at $11.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTRQX's P/E ratio is 60.49. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to PTRQX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to PTRQX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check PTRQX's competition here
SUB vs PDBZX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, PDBZX has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while PDBZX trades at $11.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PDBZX's P/E ratio is 60.49. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to PDBZX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to PDBZX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check PDBZX's competition here
SUB vs IBFFX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, IBFFX has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while IBFFX trades at $12.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBFFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to IBFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to IBFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check IBFFX's competition here
SUB vs JBFRX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, JBFRX has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while JBFRX trades at $13.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JBFRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to JBFRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to JBFRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check JBFRX's competition here
SUB vs JHBIX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, JHBIX has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while JHBIX trades at $13.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JHBIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to JHBIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to JHBIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check JHBIX's competition here
SUB vs JHNBX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, JHNBX has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while JHNBX trades at $13.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JHNBX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to JHNBX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to JHNBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check JHNBX's competition here
SUB vs USHY Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, USHY has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while USHY trades at $37.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USHY's P/E ratio is 10.98. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to USHY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is less volatile compared to USHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check USHY's competition here
SUB vs AFTFX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, AFTFX has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while AFTFX trades at $12.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFTFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to AFTFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to AFTFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check AFTFX's competition here
SUB vs NHMCX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, NHMCX has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while NHMCX trades at $18.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NHMCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to NHMCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to NHMCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check NHMCX's competition here
SUB vs IGSB Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, IGSB has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while IGSB trades at $52.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGSB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to IGSB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to IGSB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check IGSB's competition here
SUB vs LBNVX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, LBNVX has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while LBNVX trades at $7.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBNVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to LBNVX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to LBNVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check LBNVX's competition here
SUB vs SHV Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, SHV has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while SHV trades at $110.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to SHV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to SHV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check SHV's competition here
SUB vs ANBEX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, ANBEX has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while ANBEX trades at $9.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANBEX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to ANBEX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to ANBEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check ANBEX's competition here
SUB vs FBND Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, FBND has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while FBND trades at $45.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FBND's P/E ratio is 9.02. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to FBND's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is less volatile compared to FBND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check FBND's competition here
SUB vs HYG Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, HYG has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while HYG trades at $80.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYG's P/E ratio is 11.06. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to HYG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is less volatile compared to HYG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check HYG's competition here
SUB vs PFBPX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, PFBPX has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while PFBPX trades at $9.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PFBPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to PFBPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to PFBPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check PFBPX's competition here
SUB vs PFORX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, PFORX has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while PFORX trades at $9.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PFORX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to PFORX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to PFORX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check PFORX's competition here
SUB vs PFOAX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, PFOAX has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while PFOAX trades at $9.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PFOAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to PFOAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to PFOAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check PFOAX's competition here
SUB vs FTRBX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, FTRBX has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while FTRBX trades at $9.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTRBX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to FTRBX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to FTRBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check FTRBX's competition here
SUB vs VCORX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, VCORX has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while VCORX trades at $8.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VCORX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to VCORX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to VCORX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check VCORX's competition here
SUB vs VCOBX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, VCOBX has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while VCOBX trades at $17.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VCOBX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to VCOBX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to VCOBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check VCOBX's competition here
SUB vs VUBFX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, VUBFX has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while VUBFX trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUBFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to VUBFX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to VUBFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check VUBFX's competition here
SUB vs USIG Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, USIG has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while USIG trades at $51.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to USIG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is less volatile compared to USIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check USIG's competition here
SUB vs BFIFX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, BFIFX has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while BFIFX trades at $9.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BFIFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to BFIFX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to BFIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check BFIFX's competition here
SUB vs LUBAX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, LUBAX has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while LUBAX trades at $10.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LUBAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to LUBAX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to LUBAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check LUBAX's competition here
SUB vs NHMRX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, NHMRX has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while NHMRX trades at $13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NHMRX's P/E ratio is 51.05. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to NHMRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to NHMRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check NHMRX's competition here
SUB vs NHMFX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, NHMFX has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while NHMFX trades at $13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NHMFX's P/E ratio is 51.02. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to NHMFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to NHMFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check NHMFX's competition here
SUB vs NHMAX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, NHMAX has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while NHMAX trades at $13.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NHMAX's P/E ratio is 51.02. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to NHMAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to NHMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check NHMAX's competition here
SUB vs NHCCX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, NHCCX has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while NHCCX trades at $13.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NHCCX's P/E ratio is 51.05. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to NHCCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to NHCCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check NHCCX's competition here
SUB vs VBLTX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, VBLTX has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while VBLTX trades at $15.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VBLTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to VBLTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to VBLTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check VBLTX's competition here
SUB vs TLH Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, TLH has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while TLH trades at $100.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to TLH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is less volatile compared to TLH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check TLH's competition here
SUB vs BIMSX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, BIMSX has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while BIMSX trades at $11.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIMSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to BIMSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to BIMSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check BIMSX's competition here
SUB vs BSBIX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, BSBIX has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while BSBIX trades at $9.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BSBIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to BSBIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to BSBIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check BSBIX's competition here
SUB vs BSBSX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, BSBSX has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while BSBSX trades at $9.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BSBSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to BSBSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to BSBSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check BSBSX's competition here
SUB vs VLTCX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, VLTCX has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while VLTCX trades at $20.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLTCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to VLTCX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to VLTCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check VLTCX's competition here
SUB vs VCLT Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, VCLT has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while VCLT trades at $75.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VCLT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to VCLT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is less volatile compared to VCLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check VCLT's competition here
SUB vs FBNDX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, FBNDX has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while FBNDX trades at $7.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FBNDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to FBNDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to FBNDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check FBNDX's competition here
SUB vs FIKQX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, FIKQX has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while FIKQX trades at $7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIKQX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to FIKQX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to FIKQX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check FIKQX's competition here
SUB vs FIPDX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, FIPDX has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while FIPDX trades at $9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIPDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to FIPDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to FIPDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check FIPDX's competition here
SUB vs RCWAX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, RCWAX has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while RCWAX trades at $16.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RCWAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to RCWAX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to RCWAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check RCWAX's competition here
SUB vs WBFFX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, WBFFX has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while WBFFX trades at $16.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WBFFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to WBFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to WBFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check WBFFX's competition here
SUB vs SPIB Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, SPIB has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while SPIB trades at $33.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPIB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to SPIB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is less volatile compared to SPIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check SPIB's competition here
SUB vs WIPIX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, WIPIX has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while WIPIX trades at $11.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WIPIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to WIPIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to WIPIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check WIPIX's competition here
SUB vs STYAX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, STYAX has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while STYAX trades at $11.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STYAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to STYAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to STYAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check STYAX's competition here
SUB vs IIBZX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, IIBZX has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while IIBZX trades at $8.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IIBZX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to IIBZX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to IIBZX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check IIBZX's competition here
SUB vs IICIX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, IICIX has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while IICIX trades at $8.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IICIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to IICIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to IICIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check IICIX's competition here
SUB vs IIBAX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, IIBAX has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while IIBAX trades at $8.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IIBAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to IIBAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to IIBAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check IIBAX's competition here
SUB vs PTIAX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, PTIAX has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while PTIAX trades at $19.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTIAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to PTIAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to PTIAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check PTIAX's competition here
SUB vs BUBSX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, BUBSX has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while BUBSX trades at $10.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BUBSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to BUBSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to BUBSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check BUBSX's competition here
SUB vs TRBFX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, TRBFX has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while TRBFX trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRBFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to TRBFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to TRBFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check TRBFX's competition here
SUB vs SCHI Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, SCHI has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while SCHI trades at $22.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCHI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to SCHI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is less volatile compared to SCHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check SCHI's competition here
SUB vs FLOT Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, FLOT has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while FLOT trades at $51.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLOT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to FLOT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to FLOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check FLOT's competition here
SUB vs FUTBX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, FUTBX has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while FUTBX trades at $8.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUTBX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to FUTBX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to FUTBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check FUTBX's competition here
SUB vs SPAB Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, SPAB has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while SPAB trades at $25.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPAB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to SPAB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is less volatile compared to SPAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check SPAB's competition here
SUB vs SPHY Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, SPHY has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while SPHY trades at $23.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPHY's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to SPHY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to SPHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check SPHY's competition here
SUB vs JNK Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, JNK has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while JNK trades at $97.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JNK's P/E ratio is 20.32. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to JNK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to JNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check JNK's competition here
SUB vs SCHZ Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, SCHZ has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while SCHZ trades at $23.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCHZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to SCHZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is less volatile compared to SCHZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check SCHZ's competition here
SUB vs VBLAX Comparison July 2025
SUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUB stands at 9.9B. In comparison, VBLAX has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SUB is priced at $106.65, while VBLAX trades at $10.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VBLAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUB's ROE is N/A, compared to VBLAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUB is more volatile compared to VBLAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUB.Check VBLAX's competition here