STWC Holdings, Inc.
STWC Holdings, Inc. (STWC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (STWC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Consulting Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STWC | $0.00 | +39900.00% | 35.4K | N/A | -$0.40 | N/A |
| EXPGF | $34.57 | -0.26% | 31.6B | 23.36 | $1.48 | +1.84% |
| EXPGY | $34.05 | -2.94% | 31.2B | 23.05 | $1.48 | +1.85% |
| SGSOF | $121.87 | -2.50% | 23.5B | 29.80 | $4.09 | +2.97% |
| SGSOY | $12.13 | +0.25% | 23.4B | 26.98 | $0.45 | +3.18% |
| BVVBY | $64.60 | -1.07% | 14.3B | 18.79 | $3.44 | +3.28% |
| BVRDF | $32.23 | -2.75% | 14.3B | 18.74 | $1.72 | +3.29% |
| CPBLF | $16.10 | +0.00% | 8.2B | 42.37 | $0.38 | +1.69% |
| BYCRF | $42.33 | +0.00% | 6.4B | 28.41 | $1.49 | +1.39% |
| DKSHF | $70.01 | +0.00% | 4.5B | 17.95 | $3.90 | +3.81% |
Stock Comparison
STWC vs EXPGF Comparison February 2026
STWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STWC stands at 35.4K. In comparison, EXPGF has a market cap of 31.6B. Regarding current trading prices, STWC is priced at $0.00, while EXPGF trades at $34.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXPGF's P/E ratio is 23.36. In terms of profitability, STWC's ROE is +2.23%, compared to EXPGF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, STWC is more volatile compared to EXPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STWC.Check EXPGF's competition here
STWC vs EXPGY Comparison February 2026
STWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STWC stands at 35.4K. In comparison, EXPGY has a market cap of 31.2B. Regarding current trading prices, STWC is priced at $0.00, while EXPGY trades at $34.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXPGY's P/E ratio is 23.05. In terms of profitability, STWC's ROE is +2.23%, compared to EXPGY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, STWC is more volatile compared to EXPGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STWC.Check EXPGY's competition here
STWC vs SGSOF Comparison February 2026
STWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STWC stands at 35.4K. In comparison, SGSOF has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, STWC is priced at $0.00, while SGSOF trades at $121.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGSOF's P/E ratio is 29.80. In terms of profitability, STWC's ROE is +2.23%, compared to SGSOF's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, STWC is more volatile compared to SGSOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STWC.Check SGSOF's competition here
STWC vs SGSOY Comparison February 2026
STWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STWC stands at 35.4K. In comparison, SGSOY has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, STWC is priced at $0.00, while SGSOY trades at $12.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGSOY's P/E ratio is 26.98. In terms of profitability, STWC's ROE is +2.23%, compared to SGSOY's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, STWC is more volatile compared to SGSOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STWC.Check SGSOY's competition here
STWC vs BVVBY Comparison February 2026
STWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STWC stands at 35.4K. In comparison, BVVBY has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, STWC is priced at $0.00, while BVVBY trades at $64.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BVVBY's P/E ratio is 18.79. In terms of profitability, STWC's ROE is +2.23%, compared to BVVBY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, STWC is more volatile compared to BVVBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STWC.Check BVVBY's competition here
STWC vs BVRDF Comparison February 2026
STWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STWC stands at 35.4K. In comparison, BVRDF has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, STWC is priced at $0.00, while BVRDF trades at $32.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BVRDF's P/E ratio is 18.74. In terms of profitability, STWC's ROE is +2.23%, compared to BVRDF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, STWC is more volatile compared to BVRDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STWC.Check BVRDF's competition here
STWC vs CPBLF Comparison February 2026
STWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STWC stands at 35.4K. In comparison, CPBLF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, STWC is priced at $0.00, while CPBLF trades at $16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPBLF's P/E ratio is 42.37. In terms of profitability, STWC's ROE is +2.23%, compared to CPBLF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, STWC is more volatile compared to CPBLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STWC.Check CPBLF's competition here
STWC vs BYCRF Comparison February 2026
STWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STWC stands at 35.4K. In comparison, BYCRF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, STWC is priced at $0.00, while BYCRF trades at $42.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BYCRF's P/E ratio is 28.41. In terms of profitability, STWC's ROE is +2.23%, compared to BYCRF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, STWC is more volatile compared to BYCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STWC.Check BYCRF's competition here
STWC vs DKSHF Comparison February 2026
STWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STWC stands at 35.4K. In comparison, DKSHF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, STWC is priced at $0.00, while DKSHF trades at $70.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DKSHF's P/E ratio is 17.95. In terms of profitability, STWC's ROE is +2.23%, compared to DKSHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, STWC is more volatile compared to DKSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STWC.Check DKSHF's competition here
STWC vs WPFH Comparison February 2026
STWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STWC stands at 35.4K. In comparison, WPFH has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, STWC is priced at $0.00, while WPFH trades at $6.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WPFH's P/E ratio is -4.86. In terms of profitability, STWC's ROE is +2.23%, compared to WPFH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STWC is more volatile compared to WPFH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STWC.Check WPFH's competition here
STWC vs IPSOF Comparison February 2026
STWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STWC stands at 35.4K. In comparison, IPSOF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, STWC is priced at $0.00, while IPSOF trades at $37.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPSOF's P/E ratio is 7.67. In terms of profitability, STWC's ROE is +2.23%, compared to IPSOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, STWC is more volatile compared to IPSOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STWC.Check IPSOF's competition here
STWC vs BGPBF Comparison February 2026
STWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STWC stands at 35.4K. In comparison, BGPBF has a market cap of 433M. Regarding current trading prices, STWC is priced at $0.00, while BGPBF trades at $23.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BGPBF's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, STWC's ROE is +2.23%, compared to BGPBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, STWC is more volatile compared to BGPBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STWC.Check BGPBF's competition here
STWC vs AYAG Comparison February 2026
STWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STWC stands at 35.4K. In comparison, AYAG has a market cap of 423M. Regarding current trading prices, STWC is priced at $0.00, while AYAG trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AYAG's P/E ratio is 4.29. In terms of profitability, STWC's ROE is +2.23%, compared to AYAG's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, STWC is more volatile compared to AYAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STWC.Check AYAG's competition here
STWC vs RCDOF Comparison February 2026
STWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STWC stands at 35.4K. In comparison, RCDOF has a market cap of 170.6M. Regarding current trading prices, STWC is priced at $0.00, while RCDOF trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RCDOF's P/E ratio is -274.20. In terms of profitability, STWC's ROE is +2.23%, compared to RCDOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STWC is more volatile compared to RCDOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STWC.Check RCDOF's competition here
STWC vs GLCP Comparison February 2026
STWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STWC stands at 35.4K. In comparison, GLCP has a market cap of 154.4M. Regarding current trading prices, STWC is priced at $0.00, while GLCP trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STWC's ROE is +2.23%, compared to GLCP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STWC is more volatile compared to GLCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STWC.Check GLCP's competition here
STWC vs EUBG Comparison February 2026
STWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STWC stands at 35.4K. In comparison, EUBG has a market cap of 124M. Regarding current trading prices, STWC is priced at $0.00, while EUBG trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUBG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STWC's ROE is +2.23%, compared to EUBG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, STWC is more volatile compared to EUBG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STWC.Check EUBG's competition here
STWC vs FLCX Comparison February 2026
STWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STWC stands at 35.4K. In comparison, FLCX has a market cap of 74.5M. Regarding current trading prices, STWC is priced at $0.00, while FLCX trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLCX's P/E ratio is 3.13. In terms of profitability, STWC's ROE is +2.23%, compared to FLCX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, STWC is more volatile compared to FLCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STWC.Check FLCX's competition here
STWC vs KMNCF Comparison February 2026
STWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STWC stands at 35.4K. In comparison, KMNCF has a market cap of 70.7M. Regarding current trading prices, STWC is priced at $0.00, while KMNCF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KMNCF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, STWC's ROE is +2.23%, compared to KMNCF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, STWC is more volatile compared to KMNCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STWC.Check KMNCF's competition here
STWC vs MANOF Comparison February 2026
STWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STWC stands at 35.4K. In comparison, MANOF has a market cap of 33.3M. Regarding current trading prices, STWC is priced at $0.00, while MANOF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MANOF's P/E ratio is 38.00. In terms of profitability, STWC's ROE is +2.23%, compared to MANOF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, STWC is more volatile compared to MANOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STWC.Check MANOF's competition here
STWC vs GPLS Comparison February 2026
STWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STWC stands at 35.4K. In comparison, GPLS has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, STWC is priced at $0.00, while GPLS trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPLS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STWC's ROE is +2.23%, compared to GPLS's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, STWC is more volatile compared to GPLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STWC.Check GPLS's competition here
STWC vs DFCO Comparison February 2026
STWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STWC stands at 35.4K. In comparison, DFCO has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, STWC is priced at $0.00, while DFCO trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFCO's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, STWC's ROE is +2.23%, compared to DFCO's ROE of +1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, STWC is more volatile compared to DFCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STWC.Check DFCO's competition here
STWC vs AIMH Comparison February 2026
STWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STWC stands at 35.4K. In comparison, AIMH has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, STWC is priced at $0.00, while AIMH trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIMH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STWC's ROE is +2.23%, compared to AIMH's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, STWC is more volatile compared to AIMH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STWC.Check AIMH's competition here
STWC vs GTVH Comparison February 2026
STWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STWC stands at 35.4K. In comparison, GTVH has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, STWC is priced at $0.00, while GTVH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTVH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STWC's ROE is +2.23%, compared to GTVH's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, STWC is more volatile compared to GTVH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STWC.Check GTVH's competition here
STWC vs VIZC Comparison February 2026
STWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STWC stands at 35.4K. In comparison, VIZC has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, STWC is priced at $0.00, while VIZC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIZC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STWC's ROE is +2.23%, compared to VIZC's ROE of +2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, STWC is more volatile compared to VIZC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STWC.Check VIZC's competition here
STWC vs BLDV Comparison February 2026
STWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STWC stands at 35.4K. In comparison, BLDV has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, STWC is priced at $0.00, while BLDV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLDV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STWC's ROE is +2.23%, compared to BLDV's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, STWC is more volatile compared to BLDV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STWC.Check BLDV's competition here
STWC vs INTO Comparison February 2026
STWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STWC stands at 35.4K. In comparison, INTO has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, STWC is priced at $0.00, while INTO trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STWC's ROE is +2.23%, compared to INTO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, STWC is more volatile compared to INTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STWC.Check INTO's competition here
STWC vs QPRC Comparison February 2026
STWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STWC stands at 35.4K. In comparison, QPRC has a market cap of 710.8K. Regarding current trading prices, STWC is priced at $0.00, while QPRC trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QPRC's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, STWC's ROE is +2.23%, compared to QPRC's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, STWC is more volatile compared to QPRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STWC.Check QPRC's competition here
STWC vs ADHC Comparison February 2026
STWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STWC stands at 35.4K. In comparison, ADHC has a market cap of 620.3K. Regarding current trading prices, STWC is priced at $0.00, while ADHC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADHC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STWC's ROE is +2.23%, compared to ADHC's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, STWC is more volatile compared to ADHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STWC.Check ADHC's competition here
STWC vs ENCC Comparison February 2026
STWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STWC stands at 35.4K. In comparison, ENCC has a market cap of 594.4K. Regarding current trading prices, STWC is priced at $0.00, while ENCC trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENCC's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, STWC's ROE is +2.23%, compared to ENCC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STWC is more volatile compared to ENCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STWC.Check ENCC's competition here
STWC vs AERS Comparison February 2026
STWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STWC stands at 35.4K. In comparison, AERS has a market cap of 539.5K. Regarding current trading prices, STWC is priced at $0.00, while AERS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AERS's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, STWC's ROE is +2.23%, compared to AERS's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, STWC is more volatile compared to AERS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STWC.Check AERS's competition here
STWC vs SGDH Comparison February 2026
STWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STWC stands at 35.4K. In comparison, SGDH has a market cap of 245.4K. Regarding current trading prices, STWC is priced at $0.00, while SGDH trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGDH's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, STWC's ROE is +2.23%, compared to SGDH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STWC is more volatile compared to SGDH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STWC.Check SGDH's competition here
STWC vs DCAC Comparison February 2026
STWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STWC stands at 35.4K. In comparison, DCAC has a market cap of 174.1K. Regarding current trading prices, STWC is priced at $0.00, while DCAC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DCAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STWC's ROE is +2.23%, compared to DCAC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, STWC is more volatile compared to DCAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STWC.Check DCAC's competition here
STWC vs MRDH Comparison February 2026
STWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STWC stands at 35.4K. In comparison, MRDH has a market cap of 172.8K. Regarding current trading prices, STWC is priced at $0.00, while MRDH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRDH's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, STWC's ROE is +2.23%, compared to MRDH's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, STWC is more volatile compared to MRDH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STWC.Check MRDH's competition here
STWC vs LGBS Comparison February 2026
STWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STWC stands at 35.4K. In comparison, LGBS has a market cap of 140.4K. Regarding current trading prices, STWC is priced at $0.00, while LGBS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LGBS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STWC's ROE is +2.23%, compared to LGBS's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, STWC is more volatile compared to LGBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STWC.Check LGBS's competition here
STWC vs PCHK Comparison February 2026
STWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STWC stands at 35.4K. In comparison, PCHK has a market cap of 120K. Regarding current trading prices, STWC is priced at $0.00, while PCHK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCHK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STWC's ROE is +2.23%, compared to PCHK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, STWC is more volatile compared to PCHK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STWC.Check PCHK's competition here
STWC vs SYNJ Comparison February 2026
STWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STWC stands at 35.4K. In comparison, SYNJ has a market cap of 101.9K. Regarding current trading prices, STWC is priced at $0.00, while SYNJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYNJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STWC's ROE is +2.23%, compared to SYNJ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STWC is more volatile compared to SYNJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STWC.Check SYNJ's competition here
STWC vs DEQI Comparison February 2026
STWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STWC stands at 35.4K. In comparison, DEQI has a market cap of 92.8K. Regarding current trading prices, STWC is priced at $0.00, while DEQI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DEQI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STWC's ROE is +2.23%, compared to DEQI's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, STWC is more volatile compared to DEQI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STWC.Check DEQI's competition here
STWC vs MSYN Comparison February 2026
STWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STWC stands at 35.4K. In comparison, MSYN has a market cap of 87.5K. Regarding current trading prices, STWC is priced at $0.00, while MSYN trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSYN's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, STWC's ROE is +2.23%, compared to MSYN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STWC is more volatile compared to MSYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STWC.Check MSYN's competition here
STWC vs ITEC Comparison February 2026
STWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STWC stands at 35.4K. In comparison, ITEC has a market cap of 72K. Regarding current trading prices, STWC is priced at $0.00, while ITEC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITEC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STWC's ROE is +2.23%, compared to ITEC's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, STWC is more volatile compared to ITEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STWC.Check ITEC's competition here
STWC vs CSLI Comparison February 2026
STWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STWC stands at 35.4K. In comparison, CSLI has a market cap of 64.9K. Regarding current trading prices, STWC is priced at $0.00, while CSLI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSLI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, STWC's ROE is +2.23%, compared to CSLI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, STWC is more volatile compared to CSLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STWC.Check CSLI's competition here
STWC vs AMMJ Comparison February 2026
STWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STWC stands at 35.4K. In comparison, AMMJ has a market cap of 55.7K. Regarding current trading prices, STWC is priced at $0.00, while AMMJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMMJ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, STWC's ROE is +2.23%, compared to AMMJ's ROE of -3.91%. Regarding short-term risk, STWC is more volatile compared to AMMJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STWC.Check AMMJ's competition here
STWC vs FUGI Comparison February 2026
STWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STWC stands at 35.4K. In comparison, FUGI has a market cap of 24.3K. Regarding current trading prices, STWC is priced at $0.00, while FUGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUGI's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, STWC's ROE is +2.23%, compared to FUGI's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, STWC is more volatile compared to FUGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STWC.Check FUGI's competition here
STWC vs HDST Comparison February 2026
STWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STWC stands at 35.4K. In comparison, HDST has a market cap of 141. Regarding current trading prices, STWC is priced at $0.00, while HDST trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HDST's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, STWC's ROE is +2.23%, compared to HDST's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, STWC is more volatile compared to HDST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STWC.Check HDST's competition here
STWC vs GLSEF Comparison February 2026
STWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STWC stands at 35.4K. In comparison, GLSEF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, STWC is priced at $0.00, while GLSEF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLSEF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, STWC's ROE is +2.23%, compared to GLSEF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, STWC is more volatile compared to GLSEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STWC.Check GLSEF's competition here
STWC vs ISAT Comparison February 2026
STWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STWC stands at 35.4K. In comparison, ISAT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, STWC is priced at $0.00, while ISAT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISAT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STWC's ROE is +2.23%, compared to ISAT's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, STWC is more volatile compared to ISAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STWC.Check ISAT's competition here
STWC vs RPSGF Comparison February 2026
STWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STWC stands at 35.4K. In comparison, RPSGF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, STWC is priced at $0.00, while RPSGF trades at $2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RPSGF's P/E ratio is 62.25. In terms of profitability, STWC's ROE is +2.23%, compared to RPSGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, STWC is more volatile compared to RPSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STWC.Check RPSGF's competition here