Santos Limited
Santos Limited STOSF Peers
See (STOSF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STOSF | $4.98 | +0.00% | 16.1B | 13.11 | $0.38 | +4.71% |
| NSTKF | $22.29 | +0.00% | 66.8B | 9.49 | $2.35 | N/A |
| WOPEF | $15.44 | -1.34% | 29.3B | 8.26 | $1.87 | +7.93% |
| PEXNY | $10.38 | -5.64% | 20.6B | 8.80 | $1.18 | +5.10% |
| RGRLF | $0.26 | -4.19% | 18.8B | -9.95 | -$0.03 | N/A |
| TRMLF | $47.93 | +0.84% | 18.5B | 19.40 | $2.46 | +4.07% |
| DETNF | $26.92 | +0.00% | 17B | 19.12 | $1.41 | N/A |
| IPXHY | $14.03 | +1.45% | 16.7B | 5.73 | $2.44 | +3.03% |
| SSLZY | $5.00 | -0.60% | 16.2B | 13.18 | $0.38 | +1.78% |
| IPXHF | $13.49 | +0.00% | 16.2B | 5.53 | $2.44 | +4.20% |
Stock Comparison
STOSF vs NSTKF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, NSTKF has a market cap of 66.8B. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while NSTKF trades at $22.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas NSTKF's P/E ratio is 9.49. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NSTKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is more volatile compared to NSTKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs WOPEF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, WOPEF has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while WOPEF trades at $15.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas WOPEF's P/E ratio is 8.26. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WOPEF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is less volatile compared to WOPEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs PEXNY Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, PEXNY has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while PEXNY trades at $10.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas PEXNY's P/E ratio is 8.80. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PEXNY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is more volatile compared to PEXNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs RGRLF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, RGRLF has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while RGRLF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas RGRLF's P/E ratio is -9.95. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RGRLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is more volatile compared to RGRLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs TRMLF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, TRMLF has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while TRMLF trades at $47.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas TRMLF's P/E ratio is 19.40. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TRMLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is less volatile compared to TRMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs DETNF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, DETNF has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while DETNF trades at $26.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas DETNF's P/E ratio is 19.12. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DETNF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is more volatile compared to DETNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs IPXHY Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, IPXHY has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while IPXHY trades at $14.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas IPXHY's P/E ratio is 5.73. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IPXHY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is more volatile compared to IPXHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs SSLZY Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, SSLZY has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while SSLZY trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas SSLZY's P/E ratio is 13.18. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SSLZY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is less volatile compared to SSLZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs IPXHF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, IPXHF has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while IPXHF trades at $13.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas IPXHF's P/E ratio is 5.53. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IPXHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is less volatile compared to IPXHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs AETUF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, AETUF has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while AETUF trades at $20.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas AETUF's P/E ratio is 12.73. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AETUF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is less volatile compared to AETUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs NOVKY Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, NOVKY has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while NOVKY trades at $38.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas NOVKY's P/E ratio is 1.60. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NOVKY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is more volatile compared to NOVKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs SPGYF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, SPGYF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while SPGYF trades at $6.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas SPGYF's P/E ratio is 5.91. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SPGYF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is less volatile compared to SPGYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs PTRRY Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, PTRRY has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while PTRRY trades at $7.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas PTRRY's P/E ratio is 3.13. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PTRRY's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is more volatile compared to PTRRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs DKDRF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, DKDRF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while DKDRF trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas DKDRF's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DKDRF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is more volatile compared to DKDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs MEGEF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, MEGEF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while MEGEF trades at $18.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas MEGEF's P/E ratio is 10.88. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MEGEF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is more volatile compared to MEGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs VSOGF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, VSOGF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while VSOGF trades at $47.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas VSOGF's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VSOGF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is less volatile compared to VSOGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs HBRIY Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, HBRIY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while HBRIY trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas HBRIY's P/E ratio is -28.70. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HBRIY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is less volatile compared to HBRIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs PREKF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, PREKF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while PREKF trades at $17.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas PREKF's P/E ratio is 24.90. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PREKF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is less volatile compared to PREKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs PMOIF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, PMOIF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while PMOIF trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas PMOIF's P/E ratio is -27.50. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PMOIF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is more volatile compared to PMOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs DELKY Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, DELKY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while DELKY trades at $20.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas DELKY's P/E ratio is 12.32. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DELKY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is more volatile compared to DELKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs DLKGF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, DLKGF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while DLKGF trades at $196.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas DLKGF's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DLKGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is less volatile compared to DLKGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs OASPW Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, OASPW has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while OASPW trades at $55.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas OASPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OASPW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is more volatile compared to OASPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs PEYUF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, PEYUF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while PEYUF trades at $14.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas PEYUF's P/E ratio is 13.08. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PEYUF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is less volatile compared to PEYUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs EFVIF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, EFVIF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while EFVIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas EFVIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EFVIF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is less volatile compared to EFVIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs PRMRF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, PRMRF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while PRMRF trades at $15.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas PRMRF's P/E ratio is 2.06. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PRMRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is more volatile compared to PRMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs BTEGF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, BTEGF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while BTEGF trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas BTEGF's P/E ratio is 2.95. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BTEGF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is more volatile compared to BTEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs EERGF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, EERGF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while EERGF trades at $11.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas EERGF's P/E ratio is 19.23. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EERGF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is less volatile compared to EERGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs NUVSF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, NUVSF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while NUVSF trades at $10.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas NUVSF's P/E ratio is 7.86. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NUVSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is more volatile compared to NUVSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs ATHOF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, ATHOF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while ATHOF trades at $4.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas ATHOF's P/E ratio is 6.07. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ATHOF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is less volatile compared to ATHOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs PTGIF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, PTGIF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while PTGIF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas PTGIF's P/E ratio is 8.12. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PTGIF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is less volatile compared to PTGIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs BCHEY Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, BCHEY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while BCHEY trades at $17.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas BCHEY's P/E ratio is 33.48. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BCHEY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is less volatile compared to BCHEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs BEPTF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, BEPTF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while BEPTF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas BEPTF's P/E ratio is 28.73. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BEPTF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is less volatile compared to BEPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs IPCFF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, IPCFF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while IPCFF trades at $16.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas IPCFF's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IPCFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is more volatile compared to IPCFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs JPTXF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, JPTXF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while JPTXF trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas JPTXF's P/E ratio is 3.23. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JPTXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is less volatile compared to JPTXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs MEYYY Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, MEYYY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while MEYYY trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas MEYYY's P/E ratio is 4.76. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MEYYY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is less volatile compared to MEYYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs FRHLF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, FRHLF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while FRHLF trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas FRHLF's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FRHLF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is less volatile compared to FRHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs BIREF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, BIREF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while BIREF trades at $5.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas BIREF's P/E ratio is 14.26. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BIREF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is more volatile compared to BIREF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs AAVVF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, AAVVF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while AAVVF trades at $8.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas AAVVF's P/E ratio is -65.69. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AAVVF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is less volatile compared to AAVVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs DTNOF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, DTNOF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while DTNOF trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas DTNOF's P/E ratio is -25.20. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DTNOF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is less volatile compared to DTNOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs CDDRF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, CDDRF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while CDDRF trades at $5.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas CDDRF's P/E ratio is 8.07. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CDDRF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is more volatile compared to CDDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs CRCQW Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, CRCQW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while CRCQW trades at $17.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas CRCQW's P/E ratio is 2.64. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CRCQW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is more volatile compared to CRCQW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs WLLAW Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, WLLAW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while WLLAW trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas WLLAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WLLAW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is less volatile compared to WLLAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs KRNGF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, KRNGF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while KRNGF trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas KRNGF's P/E ratio is 9.19. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KRNGF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is less volatile compared to KRNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs PARXF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, PARXF has a market cap of 990.5M. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while PARXF trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas PARXF's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PARXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is less volatile compared to PARXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs KELTF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, KELTF has a market cap of 985M. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while KELTF trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas KELTF's P/E ratio is 26.05. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KELTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is more volatile compared to KELTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs PQEFF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, PQEFF has a market cap of 974.6M. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while PQEFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas PQEFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PQEFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is more volatile compared to PQEFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs UNEGF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, UNEGF has a market cap of 898.5M. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while UNEGF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas UNEGF's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UNEGF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is less volatile compared to UNEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs SQZZF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, SQZZF has a market cap of 884.3M. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while SQZZF trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas SQZZF's P/E ratio is 9.78. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SQZZF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is more volatile compared to SQZZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs CWEGF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, CWEGF has a market cap of 866.5M. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while CWEGF trades at $5.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas CWEGF's P/E ratio is 17.22. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CWEGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is less volatile compared to CWEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs AOIFF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, AOIFF has a market cap of 837.5M. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while AOIFF trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas AOIFF's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AOIFF's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is less volatile compared to AOIFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs CRLFF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, CRLFF has a market cap of 798.5M. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while CRLFF trades at $4.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas CRLFF's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CRLFF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is more volatile compared to CRLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs BWEFF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, BWEFF has a market cap of 774.2M. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while BWEFF trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas BWEFF's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BWEFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is less volatile compared to BWEFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs KWTEF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, KWTEF has a market cap of 658.3M. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while KWTEF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas KWTEF's P/E ratio is 20.27. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KWTEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is more volatile compared to KWTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs AAGEF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, AAGEF has a market cap of 569.4M. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while AAGEF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas AAGEF's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AAGEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is more volatile compared to AAGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs DALXF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, DALXF has a market cap of 553M. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while DALXF trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas DALXF's P/E ratio is 34.55. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DALXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is more volatile compared to DALXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs GFKSY Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, GFKSY has a market cap of 509.3M. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while GFKSY trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas GFKSY's P/E ratio is 2.05. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GFKSY's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is more volatile compared to GFKSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs GUKYF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, GUKYF has a market cap of 488.3M. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while GUKYF trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas GUKYF's P/E ratio is 75.00. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GUKYF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is less volatile compared to GUKYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs PTALF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, PTALF has a market cap of 446.5M. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while PTALF trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas PTALF's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PTALF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is less volatile compared to PTALF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs ZPTAF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, ZPTAF has a market cap of 444M. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while ZPTAF trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas ZPTAF's P/E ratio is -14.90. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ZPTAF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is more volatile compared to ZPTAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs RCKHF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, RCKHF has a market cap of 443.4M. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while RCKHF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas RCKHF's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RCKHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is more volatile compared to RCKHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs TBNRF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, TBNRF has a market cap of 414M. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while TBNRF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas TBNRF's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TBNRF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is more volatile compared to TBNRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs ATUUF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, ATUUF has a market cap of 400.5M. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while ATUUF trades at $14.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas ATUUF's P/E ratio is -44.15. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ATUUF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is more volatile compared to ATUUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs PTHRF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, PTHRF has a market cap of 388.6M. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while PTHRF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas PTHRF's P/E ratio is -34.00. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PTHRF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is less volatile compared to PTHRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs TUWLF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, TUWLF has a market cap of 387.1M. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while TUWLF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas TUWLF's P/E ratio is 6.62. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TUWLF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is more volatile compared to TUWLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs BKBEF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, BKBEF has a market cap of 384.2M. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while BKBEF trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas BKBEF's P/E ratio is 2.92. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BKBEF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is less volatile compared to BKBEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs SHASF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, SHASF has a market cap of 381.7M. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while SHASF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas SHASF's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHASF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is less volatile compared to SHASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs COPJF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, COPJF has a market cap of 371.2M. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while COPJF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas COPJF's P/E ratio is -4.67. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to COPJF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is less volatile compared to COPJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs FECCF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, FECCF has a market cap of 362.5M. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while FECCF trades at $4.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas FECCF's P/E ratio is 31.27. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FECCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is less volatile compared to FECCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs KRNGY Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, KRNGY has a market cap of 359.8M. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while KRNGY trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas KRNGY's P/E ratio is 6.09. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KRNGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is less volatile compared to KRNGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs PRYGF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, PRYGF has a market cap of 357.5M. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while PRYGF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas PRYGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PRYGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is more volatile compared to PRYGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs PEGIY Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, PEGIY has a market cap of 350.5M. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while PEGIY trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas PEGIY's P/E ratio is 5.27. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PEGIY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is more volatile compared to PEGIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs CEIEF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, CEIEF has a market cap of 331.2M. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while CEIEF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas CEIEF's P/E ratio is -31.16. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CEIEF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is more volatile compared to CEIEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs ENQUF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, ENQUF has a market cap of 324.2M. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while ENQUF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas ENQUF's P/E ratio is 3.49. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ENQUF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is more volatile compared to ENQUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs OILSF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, OILSF has a market cap of 294.7M. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while OILSF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas OILSF's P/E ratio is 2.27. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OILSF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is less volatile compared to OILSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs TUWOY Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, TUWOY has a market cap of 286.4M. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while TUWOY trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas TUWOY's P/E ratio is 4.90. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TUWOY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is less volatile compared to TUWOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs PESAF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, PESAF has a market cap of 257.3M. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while PESAF trades at $2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas PESAF's P/E ratio is 7.55. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PESAF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is less volatile compared to PESAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs EXCE Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, EXCE has a market cap of 248.2M. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while EXCE trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas EXCE's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EXCE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is more volatile compared to EXCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs HZNFF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, HZNFF has a market cap of 211.3M. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while HZNFF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas HZNFF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HZNFF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is less volatile compared to HZNFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs GEGYF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, GEGYF has a market cap of 208.4M. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while GEGYF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas GEGYF's P/E ratio is -3.29. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GEGYF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is more volatile compared to GEGYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs ZNOG Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, ZNOG has a market cap of 200.8M. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while ZNOG trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas ZNOG's P/E ratio is -18.23. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ZNOG's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is less volatile compared to ZNOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs ITEEF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, ITEEF has a market cap of 198.5M. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while ITEEF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas ITEEF's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ITEEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is less volatile compared to ITEEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs EEGUF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, EEGUF has a market cap of 197.5M. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while EEGUF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas EEGUF's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EEGUF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is less volatile compared to EEGUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs SEUSF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, SEUSF has a market cap of 195.7M. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while SEUSF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas SEUSF's P/E ratio is -17.33. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SEUSF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is less volatile compared to SEUSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs CRNZF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, CRNZF has a market cap of 195.5M. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while CRNZF trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas CRNZF's P/E ratio is -17.81. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CRNZF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is less volatile compared to CRNZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs IPOOF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, IPOOF has a market cap of 186.5M. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while IPOOF trades at $6.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas IPOOF's P/E ratio is 15.61. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IPOOF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is less volatile compared to IPOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs PSHIF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, PSHIF has a market cap of 186.3M. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while PSHIF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas PSHIF's P/E ratio is 5.40. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PSHIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is less volatile compared to PSHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs HRCXF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, HRCXF has a market cap of 184M. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while HRCXF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas HRCXF's P/E ratio is 1.69. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HRCXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is more volatile compared to HRCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs ALVOF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, ALVOF has a market cap of 171.9M. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while ALVOF trades at $4.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas ALVOF's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ALVOF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is less volatile compared to ALVOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs RECWF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, RECWF has a market cap of 169.3M. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while RECWF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas RECWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RECWF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is more volatile compared to RECWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs GASXF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, GASXF has a market cap of 168.9M. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while GASXF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas GASXF's P/E ratio is -7.27. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GASXF's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is more volatile compared to GASXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs PIFYF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, PIFYF has a market cap of 167.3M. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while PIFYF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas PIFYF's P/E ratio is -11.66. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PIFYF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is less volatile compared to PIFYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs GEGYY Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, GEGYY has a market cap of 157.8M. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while GEGYY trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas GEGYY's P/E ratio is -2.49. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GEGYY's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is less volatile compared to GEGYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs PNWRF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, PNWRF has a market cap of 155.7M. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while PNWRF trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas PNWRF's P/E ratio is -14.33. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PNWRF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is more volatile compared to PNWRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs KGEIF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, KGEIF has a market cap of 155M. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while KGEIF trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas KGEIF's P/E ratio is 6.30. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KGEIF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is less volatile compared to KGEIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs LNDNF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, LNDNF has a market cap of 148.7M. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while LNDNF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas LNDNF's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LNDNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is less volatile compared to LNDNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs SVNNF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, SVNNF has a market cap of 136.9M. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while SVNNF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas SVNNF's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SVNNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is more volatile compared to SVNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs SLGYF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, SLGYF has a market cap of 135M. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while SLGYF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas SLGYF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SLGYF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is more volatile compared to SLGYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs CVONF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, CVONF has a market cap of 134.2M. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while CVONF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas CVONF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CVONF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is less volatile compared to CVONF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.
STOSF vs RUBLF Comparison
STOSF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STOSF stands at 16.1B. In comparison, RUBLF has a market cap of 133.6M. Regarding current trading prices, STOSF is priced at $4.98, while RUBLF trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STOSF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.11, whereas RUBLF's P/E ratio is 2.48. In terms of profitability, STOSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RUBLF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, STOSF is more volatile compared to RUBLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STOSF.