StrikePoint Gold Inc.
StrikePoint Gold Inc. STKXF Peers
See (STKXF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STKXF | $0.10 | +17.65% | 4.16M | -0.83 | -$0.12 | N/A |
| BHPLF | $25.00 | +3.07% | 126.88B | 11.16 | $2.24 | +4.96% |
| RTNTF | $76.57 | -2.55% | 106.06B | 10.83 | $7.07 | +3.07% |
| RTPPF | $61.75 | +0.97% | 105.76B | 8.73 | $7.07 | +6.51% |
| GLCNF | $3.68 | +3.23% | 44.22B | -28.31 | -$0.13 | +3.10% |
| GLNCY | $7.26 | +1.83% | 44.10B | -27.92 | -$0.26 | +2.96% |
| GMBXF | $5.40 | -0.07% | 42.01B | 11.73 | $0.46 | +2.29% |
| NGLOY | $14.90 | +4.71% | 36.16B | -11.73 | -$1.27 | +2.14% |
| AAUKF | $29.61 | +6.86% | 35.93B | -11.70 | -$2.53 | +2.12% |
| FSUMF | $10.50 | -1.87% | 32.28B | 8.27 | $1.27 | +8.43% |
Stock Comparison
STKXF vs BHPLF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, BHPLF has a market cap of 126.88B. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while BHPLF trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas BHPLF's P/E ratio is 11.16. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to BHPLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to BHPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs RTNTF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 106.06B. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while RTNTF trades at $76.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to RTNTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs RTPPF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 105.76B. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while RTPPF trades at $61.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 8.73. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to RTPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs GLCNF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 44.22B. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while GLCNF trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is -28.31. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to GLCNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to GLCNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs GLNCY Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, GLNCY has a market cap of 44.10B. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while GLNCY trades at $7.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas GLNCY's P/E ratio is -27.92. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to GLNCY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to GLNCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs GMBXF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 42.01B. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while GMBXF trades at $5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 11.73. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs NGLOY Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 36.16B. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while NGLOY trades at $14.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -11.73. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs AAUKF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 35.93B. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while AAUKF trades at $29.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -11.70. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to AAUKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs FSUMF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, FSUMF has a market cap of 32.28B. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while FSUMF trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas FSUMF's P/E ratio is 8.27. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to FSUMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to FSUMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs FSUGY Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, FSUGY has a market cap of 30.88B. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while FSUGY trades at $20.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas FSUGY's P/E ratio is 7.94. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to FSUGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to FSUGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs CMCLF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 20.18B. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while CMCLF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to CMCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs TCKRF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 16.65B. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while TCKRF trades at $33.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 676.80. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to TCKRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs IVPAF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 12.71B. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while IVPAF trades at $9.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 29.37. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs BOLIF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.48B. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to BOLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs BDNNY Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 9.33B. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while BDNNY trades at $65.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 7.87. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs JXMNF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, JXMNF has a market cap of 8.78B. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while JXMNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas JXMNF's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to JXMNF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is less volatile compared to JXMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs SHTLF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 8.76B. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while SHTLF trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is -39.00. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to SHTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs IPOAF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, IPOAF has a market cap of 8.74B. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while IPOAF trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas IPOAF's P/E ratio is 29.33. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to IPOAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to IPOAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs ABML Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.69B. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while ABML trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is less volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs SMMYY Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 6.22B. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while SMMYY trades at $5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 56.50. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs STMNF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 5.23B. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while STMNF trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 46.34. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to STMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs PUTKF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 5.08B. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while PUTKF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to PUTKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs LYSDY Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 4.92B. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while LYSDY trades at $5.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 131.50. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs LYSCF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 4.88B. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while LYSCF trades at $5.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 130.50. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs PUTKY Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 4.83B. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while PUTKY trades at $26.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 4.37. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs NILSY Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.62B. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while NILSY trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to NILSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs PAEKY Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 4.23B. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while PAEKY trades at $17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 19.15. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to PAEKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs MALRY Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 3.03B. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while MALRY trades at $15.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is -3.84. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to MALRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to MALRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs MALRF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 3.03B. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while MALRF trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is -3.86. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to MALRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is less volatile compared to MALRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs FLMMF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 2.99B. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs PILBF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 2.92B. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while PILBF trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -90.60. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to PILBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs CHZQ Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, CHZQ has a market cap of 2.66B. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while CHZQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas CHZQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to CHZQ's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to CHZQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs NGXXF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 2.25B. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while NGXXF trades at $10.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -38.89. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs PTNDY Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 2.22B. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while PTNDY trades at $10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 29.19. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to PTNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs MIMTF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 2.07B. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while MIMTF trades at $15.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to MIMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs PTNDF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 2.00B. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while PTNDF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to PTNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs AZZVF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 1.97B. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to AZZVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs AFBOF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 1.81B. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while AFBOF trades at $9.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 10.07. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is less volatile compared to AFBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs DWMNF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 1.80B. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while DWMNF trades at $30.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 9.65. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to DWMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs IIDDY Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 1.78B. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while IIDDY trades at $4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to IIDDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to IIDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs NICMF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 1.78B. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while NICMF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -10.25. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to NICMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs IPGDF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 1.78B. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while IPGDF trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to IPGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to IPGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs SOUHY Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 1.76B. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while SOUHY trades at $9.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is -37.42. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs ERMAF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.57B. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while ERMAF trades at $54.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is 97.79. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to ERMAF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to ERMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs ERMAY Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.56B. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while ERMAY trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is 90.83. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to ERMAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to ERMAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs DETRF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.29B. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while DETRF trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 14.29. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to DETRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs ILKAY Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while ILKAY trades at $13.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is 7.91. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to ILKAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to ILKAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs ADTLF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while ADTLF trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -14.26. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to ADTLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to ADTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs AZRMF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to AZRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs ADMLF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while ADMLF trades at $3.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -13.87. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to ADMLF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs ILKAF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while ILKAF trades at $2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is 7.11. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to ILKAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to ILKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs BQSSF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 1.05B. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while BQSSF trades at $2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -63.00. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to BQSSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs FMCXF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 946.92M. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while FMCXF trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -56.12. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs ATUSF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 922.62M. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while ATUSF trades at $19.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 12.94. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs STTSY Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 918.42M. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while STTSY trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to STTSY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to STTSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs LINRF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 899.86M. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while LINRF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -37.07. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to LINRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs AUSDF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 876.35M. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while AUSDF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 15.73. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is less volatile compared to AUSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs AFMJF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 867.82M. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while AFMJF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs JMXXF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, JMXXF has a market cap of 862.86M. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while JMXXF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas JMXXF's P/E ratio is 44.00. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to JMXXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is less volatile compared to JMXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs TAOFF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, TAOFF has a market cap of 705.35M. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while TAOFF trades at $2.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas TAOFF's P/E ratio is -22.10. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to TAOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is less volatile compared to TAOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs AMVMF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, AMVMF has a market cap of 693.79M. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while AMVMF trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas AMVMF's P/E ratio is -56.58. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to AMVMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to AMVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs MFRVF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 604.58M. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while MFRVF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to MFRVF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is less volatile compared to MFRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs VULNF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 598.33M. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while VULNF trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -10.58. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to VULNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs CTJHF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, CTJHF has a market cap of 596.40M. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while CTJHF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas CTJHF's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to CTJHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is less volatile compared to CTJHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs MJDLF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 500.89M. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while MJDLF trades at $6.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 20.40. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to MJDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs ALMTF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 499.37M. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while ALMTF trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -14.55. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs TTNNF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 492.10M. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while TTNNF trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to TTNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs OSTTF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 490.16M. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while OSTTF trades at $13.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is less volatile compared to OSTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs MCRZF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.46M. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs BIRNF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 433.13M. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while BIRNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to BIRNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs REEMF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, REEMF has a market cap of 401.55M. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while REEMF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas REEMF's P/E ratio is -25.93. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to REEMF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to REEMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs MCHHF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 390.80M. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while MCHHF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 18.51. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to MCHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs LLLAF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, LLLAF has a market cap of 389.26M. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while LLLAF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas LLLAF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to LLLAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is less volatile compared to LLLAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs FGOVF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 388.50M. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while FGOVF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -73.45. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs NQMIY Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.42M. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to NQMIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs PXMFF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, PXMFF has a market cap of 379.33M. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while PXMFF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas PXMFF's P/E ratio is 3.28. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to PXMFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is less volatile compared to PXMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs MNXMF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 359.66M. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while MNXMF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -62.61. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to MNXMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs CTJHY Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, CTJHY has a market cap of 351.63M. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while CTJHY trades at $8.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas CTJHY's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to CTJHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to CTJHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs ERLFF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 342.21M. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while ERLFF trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -33.00. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to ERLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs KMRPF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, KMRPF has a market cap of 335.16M. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while KMRPF trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas KMRPF's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to KMRPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to KMRPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs MLYF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, MLYF has a market cap of 329.28M. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while MLYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas MLYF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to MLYF's ROE of +5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is less volatile compared to MLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs AUMTF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, AUMTF has a market cap of 313.13M. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while AUMTF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas AUMTF's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to AUMTF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is less volatile compared to AUMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs SLGGF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 300.11M. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while SLGGF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to SLGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs MLXEF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 298.45M. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while MLXEF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to MLXEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs ARAFF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 295.72M. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while ARAFF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to ARAFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs LTSRF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, LTSRF has a market cap of 291.48M. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while LTSRF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas LTSRF's P/E ratio is -12.30. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to LTSRF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to LTSRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs SVMLF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, SVMLF has a market cap of 278.18M. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while SVMLF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas SVMLF's P/E ratio is -14.33. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to SVMLF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to SVMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs FWEDF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 274.92M. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while FWEDF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -9.99. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs CGMLF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 268.43M. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while CGMLF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -17.25. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to CGMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs LRSRF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, LRSRF has a market cap of 260.54M. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while LRSRF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas LRSRF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to LRSRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is less volatile compared to LRSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs STQNF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, STQNF has a market cap of 251.56M. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while STQNF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas STQNF's P/E ratio is -17.20. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to STQNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to STQNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs PMETF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, PMETF has a market cap of 249.86M. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while PMETF trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas PMETF's P/E ratio is -53.00. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to PMETF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to PMETF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs ERDCF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, ERDCF has a market cap of 241.88M. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while ERDCF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas ERDCF's P/E ratio is -66.63. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to ERDCF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to ERDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs SRHYY Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, SRHYY has a market cap of 239.72M. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while SRHYY trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas SRHYY's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to SRHYY's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to SRHYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs RXRLF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, RXRLF has a market cap of 238.68M. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while RXRLF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas RXRLF's P/E ratio is -29.90. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to RXRLF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is less volatile compared to RXRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs LTHHF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, LTHHF has a market cap of 238.10M. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while LTHHF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas LTHHF's P/E ratio is -16.02. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to LTHHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to LTHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs BSRUF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, BSRUF has a market cap of 237.84M. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while BSRUF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas BSRUF's P/E ratio is -5.09. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to BSRUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to BSRUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs PTTMF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, PTTMF has a market cap of 234.60M. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while PTTMF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas PTTMF's P/E ratio is 3.15. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to PTTMF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is less volatile compared to PTTMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.
STKXF vs CILLF Comparison
STKXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STKXF stands at 4.16M. In comparison, CILLF has a market cap of 232.44M. Regarding current trading prices, STKXF is priced at $0.10, while CILLF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STKXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas CILLF's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, STKXF's ROE is -3.08%, compared to CILLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, STKXF is more volatile compared to CILLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STKXF.