STEP Energy Services Ltd.
STEP Energy Services Ltd. (STEP.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (STEP.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STEP.TO | CA$5.49 | -0.18% | 400.1M | -49.91 | -CA$0.11 | N/A |
| CEU.TO | CA$18.41 | -0.73% | 3.9B | 20.01 | CA$0.92 | +0.99% |
| EFX.TO | CA$29.10 | +1.75% | 3.5B | 40.42 | CA$0.72 | +0.55% |
| TVK.TO | CA$132.23 | -1.25% | 2.9B | 31.41 | CA$4.21 | +0.57% |
| TCW.TO | CA$7.31 | -1.75% | 1.5B | 12.82 | CA$0.57 | +2.95% |
| SCL.TO | CA$16.57 | +1.04% | 1.2B | 552.33 | CA$0.03 | N/A |
| PSI.TO | CA$13.24 | +0.00% | 1B | 19.47 | CA$0.68 | +3.94% |
| TOT.TO | CA$22.70 | -1.48% | 827.1M | 11.64 | CA$1.95 | +1.84% |
| MATR.TO | CA$9.10 | +2.36% | 558.3M | 19.78 | CA$0.46 | N/A |
| NOA.TO | CA$18.77 | +3.47% | 545.7M | 16.46 | CA$1.14 | +2.58% |
Stock Comparison
STEP.TO vs CEU.TO Comparison April 2026
STEP.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STEP.TO stands at 400.1M. In comparison, CEU.TO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, STEP.TO is priced at CA$5.49, while CEU.TO trades at CA$18.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STEP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -49.91, whereas CEU.TO's P/E ratio is 20.01. In terms of profitability, STEP.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CEU.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, STEP.TO is less volatile compared to CEU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STEP.TO.Check CEU.TO's competition here
STEP.TO vs EFX.TO Comparison April 2026
STEP.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STEP.TO stands at 400.1M. In comparison, EFX.TO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, STEP.TO is priced at CA$5.49, while EFX.TO trades at CA$29.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STEP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -49.91, whereas EFX.TO's P/E ratio is 40.42. In terms of profitability, STEP.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EFX.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, STEP.TO is less volatile compared to EFX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STEP.TO.Check EFX.TO's competition here
STEP.TO vs TVK.TO Comparison April 2026
STEP.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STEP.TO stands at 400.1M. In comparison, TVK.TO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, STEP.TO is priced at CA$5.49, while TVK.TO trades at CA$132.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STEP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -49.91, whereas TVK.TO's P/E ratio is 31.41. In terms of profitability, STEP.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TVK.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, STEP.TO is less volatile compared to TVK.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STEP.TO.Check TVK.TO's competition here
STEP.TO vs TCW.TO Comparison April 2026
STEP.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STEP.TO stands at 400.1M. In comparison, TCW.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, STEP.TO is priced at CA$5.49, while TCW.TO trades at CA$7.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STEP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -49.91, whereas TCW.TO's P/E ratio is 12.82. In terms of profitability, STEP.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TCW.TO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, STEP.TO is less volatile compared to TCW.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STEP.TO.Check TCW.TO's competition here
STEP.TO vs SCL.TO Comparison April 2026
STEP.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STEP.TO stands at 400.1M. In comparison, SCL.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, STEP.TO is priced at CA$5.49, while SCL.TO trades at CA$16.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STEP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -49.91, whereas SCL.TO's P/E ratio is 552.33. In terms of profitability, STEP.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SCL.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, STEP.TO is less volatile compared to SCL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STEP.TO.Check SCL.TO's competition here
STEP.TO vs PSI.TO Comparison April 2026
STEP.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STEP.TO stands at 400.1M. In comparison, PSI.TO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, STEP.TO is priced at CA$5.49, while PSI.TO trades at CA$13.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STEP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -49.91, whereas PSI.TO's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, STEP.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PSI.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, STEP.TO is less volatile compared to PSI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STEP.TO.Check PSI.TO's competition here
STEP.TO vs TOT.TO Comparison April 2026
STEP.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STEP.TO stands at 400.1M. In comparison, TOT.TO has a market cap of 827.1M. Regarding current trading prices, STEP.TO is priced at CA$5.49, while TOT.TO trades at CA$22.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STEP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -49.91, whereas TOT.TO's P/E ratio is 11.64. In terms of profitability, STEP.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TOT.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, STEP.TO is less volatile compared to TOT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STEP.TO.Check TOT.TO's competition here
STEP.TO vs MATR.TO Comparison April 2026
STEP.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STEP.TO stands at 400.1M. In comparison, MATR.TO has a market cap of 558.3M. Regarding current trading prices, STEP.TO is priced at CA$5.49, while MATR.TO trades at CA$9.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STEP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -49.91, whereas MATR.TO's P/E ratio is 19.78. In terms of profitability, STEP.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MATR.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, STEP.TO is less volatile compared to MATR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STEP.TO.Check MATR.TO's competition here
STEP.TO vs NOA.TO Comparison April 2026
STEP.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STEP.TO stands at 400.1M. In comparison, NOA.TO has a market cap of 545.7M. Regarding current trading prices, STEP.TO is priced at CA$5.49, while NOA.TO trades at CA$18.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STEP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -49.91, whereas NOA.TO's P/E ratio is 16.46. In terms of profitability, STEP.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NOA.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, STEP.TO is less volatile compared to NOA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STEP.TO.Check NOA.TO's competition here
STEP.TO vs CFW.TO Comparison April 2026
STEP.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STEP.TO stands at 400.1M. In comparison, CFW.TO has a market cap of 541.8M. Regarding current trading prices, STEP.TO is priced at CA$5.49, while CFW.TO trades at CA$6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STEP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -49.91, whereas CFW.TO's P/E ratio is 13.65. In terms of profitability, STEP.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CFW.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, STEP.TO is less volatile compared to CFW.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STEP.TO.Check CFW.TO's competition here
STEP.TO vs PSD.TO Comparison April 2026
STEP.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STEP.TO stands at 400.1M. In comparison, PSD.TO has a market cap of 201.3M. Regarding current trading prices, STEP.TO is priced at CA$5.49, while PSD.TO trades at CA$3.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STEP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -49.91, whereas PSD.TO's P/E ratio is 8.63. In terms of profitability, STEP.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PSD.TO's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, STEP.TO is less volatile compared to PSD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STEP.TO.Check PSD.TO's competition here
STEP.TO vs SHLE.TO Comparison April 2026
STEP.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STEP.TO stands at 400.1M. In comparison, SHLE.TO has a market cap of 194.4M. Regarding current trading prices, STEP.TO is priced at CA$5.49, while SHLE.TO trades at CA$14.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STEP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -49.91, whereas SHLE.TO's P/E ratio is 5.99. In terms of profitability, STEP.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SHLE.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, STEP.TO is less volatile compared to SHLE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STEP.TO.Check SHLE.TO's competition here
STEP.TO vs FLNT.TO Comparison April 2026
STEP.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STEP.TO stands at 400.1M. In comparison, FLNT.TO has a market cap of 165M. Regarding current trading prices, STEP.TO is priced at CA$5.49, while FLNT.TO trades at CA$1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STEP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -49.91, whereas FLNT.TO's P/E ratio is 1.61. In terms of profitability, STEP.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FLNT.TO's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, STEP.TO is more volatile compared to FLNT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STEP.TO.Check FLNT.TO's competition here
STEP.TO vs E.TO Comparison April 2026
STEP.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STEP.TO stands at 400.1M. In comparison, E.TO has a market cap of 99.7M. Regarding current trading prices, STEP.TO is priced at CA$5.49, while E.TO trades at CA$1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STEP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -49.91, whereas E.TO's P/E ratio is 30.50. In terms of profitability, STEP.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to E.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, STEP.TO is less volatile compared to E.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STEP.TO.Check E.TO's competition here
STEP.TO vs MCB.TO Comparison April 2026
STEP.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STEP.TO stands at 400.1M. In comparison, MCB.TO has a market cap of 67.1M. Regarding current trading prices, STEP.TO is priced at CA$5.49, while MCB.TO trades at CA$2.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STEP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -49.91, whereas MCB.TO's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, STEP.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MCB.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, STEP.TO is less volatile compared to MCB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STEP.TO.Check MCB.TO's competition here
STEP.TO vs ESN.TO Comparison April 2026
STEP.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STEP.TO stands at 400.1M. In comparison, ESN.TO has a market cap of 49.6M. Regarding current trading prices, STEP.TO is priced at CA$5.49, while ESN.TO trades at CA$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STEP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -49.91, whereas ESN.TO's P/E ratio is 39.50. In terms of profitability, STEP.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ESN.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, STEP.TO is more volatile compared to ESN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STEP.TO.Check ESN.TO's competition here
STEP.TO vs SFD.TO Comparison April 2026
STEP.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STEP.TO stands at 400.1M. In comparison, SFD.TO has a market cap of 45.4M. Regarding current trading prices, STEP.TO is priced at CA$5.49, while SFD.TO trades at CA$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STEP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -49.91, whereas SFD.TO's P/E ratio is -7.80. In terms of profitability, STEP.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SFD.TO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, STEP.TO is more volatile compared to SFD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STEP.TO.Check SFD.TO's competition here
STEP.TO vs HWO.TO Comparison April 2026
STEP.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STEP.TO stands at 400.1M. In comparison, HWO.TO has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, STEP.TO is priced at CA$5.49, while HWO.TO trades at CA$0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STEP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -49.91, whereas HWO.TO's P/E ratio is -43.00. In terms of profitability, STEP.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HWO.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, STEP.TO is less volatile compared to HWO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STEP.TO.Check HWO.TO's competition here
STEP.TO vs BRY.TO Comparison April 2026
STEP.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STEP.TO stands at 400.1M. In comparison, BRY.TO has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, STEP.TO is priced at CA$5.49, while BRY.TO trades at CA$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STEP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -49.91, whereas BRY.TO's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, STEP.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BRY.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, STEP.TO is less volatile compared to BRY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STEP.TO.Check BRY.TO's competition here
STEP.TO vs CSM.TO Comparison April 2026
STEP.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STEP.TO stands at 400.1M. In comparison, CSM.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, STEP.TO is priced at CA$5.49, while CSM.TO trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STEP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -49.91, whereas CSM.TO's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, STEP.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CSM.TO's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, STEP.TO is less volatile compared to CSM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STEP.TO.Check CSM.TO's competition here
STEP.TO vs HE.TO Comparison April 2026
STEP.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STEP.TO stands at 400.1M. In comparison, HE.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, STEP.TO is priced at CA$5.49, while HE.TO trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STEP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -49.91, whereas HE.TO's P/E ratio is 0.18. In terms of profitability, STEP.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HE.TO's ROE of -102.61%. Regarding short-term risk, STEP.TO is more volatile compared to HE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STEP.TO.Check HE.TO's competition here