Sartorius AG
Sartorius AG SSSGY Peers
See (SSSGY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SSSGY | $42.11 | -0.94% | 76.7B | 135.84 | $0.31 | +0.41% |
| SRTOY | $21.39 | +1.91% | 208.1B | 89.13 | $0.24 | +0.31% |
| ESLOF | $277.77 | -0.88% | 126.9B | 47.56 | $5.84 | +1.39% |
| ESLOY | $139.23 | -1.16% | 126.8B | 47.68 | $2.92 | +1.42% |
| MECNY | $88.63 | +100.00% | 107.8B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SOAGY | $48.65 | -1.37% | 76.4B | 156.94 | $0.31 | +0.15% |
| HOCPF | $121.77 | -2.35% | 41.4B | 29.41 | $4.14 | +0.89% |
| HOCPY | $117.60 | -2.86% | 40.5B | 28.54 | $4.12 | +0.44% |
| RSMDF | $23.35 | +6.14% | 28B | 26.24 | $0.89 | +0.86% |
| TRUMF | $18.74 | -4.63% | 27.6B | 34.06 | $0.55 | +0.95% |
Stock Comparison
SSSGY vs SRTOY Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, SRTOY has a market cap of 208.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while SRTOY trades at $21.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas SRTOY's P/E ratio is 89.13. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SRTOY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY and SRTOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSSGY vs ESLOF Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, ESLOF has a market cap of 126.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while ESLOF trades at $277.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas ESLOF's P/E ratio is 47.56. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ESLOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY is less volatile compared to ESLOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSSGY.
SSSGY vs ESLOY Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, ESLOY has a market cap of 126.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while ESLOY trades at $139.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas ESLOY's P/E ratio is 47.68. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ESLOY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY is less volatile compared to ESLOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSSGY.
SSSGY vs MECNY Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, MECNY has a market cap of 107.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while MECNY trades at $88.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas MECNY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MECNY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY and MECNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSSGY vs SOAGY Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, SOAGY has a market cap of 76.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while SOAGY trades at $48.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas SOAGY's P/E ratio is 156.94. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SOAGY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY is less volatile compared to SOAGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSSGY.
SSSGY vs HOCPF Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, HOCPF has a market cap of 41.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while HOCPF trades at $121.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas HOCPF's P/E ratio is 29.41. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HOCPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY is less volatile compared to HOCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSSGY.
SSSGY vs HOCPY Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, HOCPY has a market cap of 40.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while HOCPY trades at $117.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas HOCPY's P/E ratio is 28.54. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HOCPY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY is less volatile compared to HOCPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSSGY.
SSSGY vs RSMDF Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, RSMDF has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while RSMDF trades at $23.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas RSMDF's P/E ratio is 26.24. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RSMDF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY and RSMDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSSGY vs TRUMF Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, TRUMF has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while TRUMF trades at $18.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas TRUMF's P/E ratio is 34.06. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TRUMF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY is less volatile compared to TRUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSSGY.
SSSGY vs TRUMY Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, TRUMY has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while TRUMY trades at $18.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas TRUMY's P/E ratio is 33.31. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TRUMY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY is less volatile compared to TRUMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSSGY.
SSSGY vs CLPBY Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, CLPBY has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while CLPBY trades at $9.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas CLPBY's P/E ratio is 31.10. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CLPBY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY is less volatile compared to CLPBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSSGY.
SSSGY vs CLPBF Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, CLPBF has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while CLPBF trades at $97.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas CLPBF's P/E ratio is 31.67. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CLPBF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY and CLPBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSSGY vs SDMHF Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, SDMHF has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while SDMHF trades at $216.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas SDMHF's P/E ratio is 90.27. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SDMHF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY and SDMHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSSGY vs SAUHY Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, SAUHY has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while SAUHY trades at $12.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas SAUHY's P/E ratio is 36.89. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SAUHY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY is less volatile compared to SAUHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSSGY.
SSSGY vs SAUHF Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, SAUHF has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while SAUHF trades at $128.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas SAUHF's P/E ratio is 37.10. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SAUHF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY is less volatile compared to SAUHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSSGY.
SSSGY vs SARTF Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, SARTF has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while SARTF trades at $212.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas SARTF's P/E ratio is 135.90. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SARTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY and SARTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSSGY vs SUVPF Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, SUVPF has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while SUVPF trades at $259.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas SUVPF's P/E ratio is 167.11. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SUVPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY and SUVPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSSGY vs OCPNF Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, OCPNF has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while OCPNF trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas OCPNF's P/E ratio is 18.75. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OCPNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY and OCPNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSSGY vs FSPKF Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, FSPKF has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while FSPKF trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas FSPKF's P/E ratio is 122.22. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FSPKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY and FSPKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSSGY vs SSMXY Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, SSMXY has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while SSMXY trades at $16.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas SSMXY's P/E ratio is 27.96. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SSMXY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY is less volatile compared to SSMXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSSGY.
SSSGY vs SSMXF Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, SSMXF has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while SSMXF trades at $14.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas SSMXF's P/E ratio is 24.75. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SSMXF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY and SSMXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSSGY vs CNVVY Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, CNVVY has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while CNVVY trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas CNVVY's P/E ratio is 42.42. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CNVVY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY is less volatile compared to CNVVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSSGY.
SSSGY vs CNVVF Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, CNVVF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while CNVVF trades at $3.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas CNVVF's P/E ratio is 34.78. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CNVVF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY and CNVVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSSGY vs CZMWF Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, CZMWF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while CZMWF trades at $65.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas CZMWF's P/E ratio is 32.73. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CZMWF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY and CZMWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSSGY vs YPHDF Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, YPHDF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while YPHDF trades at $417.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas YPHDF's P/E ratio is 53.45. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to YPHDF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY is less volatile compared to YPHDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSSGY.
SSSGY vs CZMWY Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, CZMWY has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while CZMWY trades at $64.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas CZMWY's P/E ratio is 32.24. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CZMWY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY is less volatile compared to CZMWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSSGY.
SSSGY vs FLMNF Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, FLMNF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while FLMNF trades at $62.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas FLMNF's P/E ratio is 30.37. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FLMNF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY and FLMNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSSGY vs FLMNY Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, FLMNY has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while FLMNY trades at $12.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas FLMNY's P/E ratio is 30.29. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FLMNY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY and FLMNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSSGY vs ADDLF Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, ADDLF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while ADDLF trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas ADDLF's P/E ratio is 61.76. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ADDLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY is less volatile compared to ADDLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSSGY.
SSSGY vs AHICF Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, AHICF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while AHICF trades at $16.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas AHICF's P/E ratio is 59.89. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AHICF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY and AHICF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSSGY vs TEVNF Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, TEVNF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while TEVNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas TEVNF's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TEVNF's ROE of +3.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY and TEVNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSSGY vs ANSLY Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, ANSLY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while ANSLY trades at $83.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas ANSLY's P/E ratio is 25.72. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ANSLY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY and ANSLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSSGY vs SHWGF Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, SHWGF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while SHWGF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas SHWGF's P/E ratio is 11.02. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SHWGF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY and SHWGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSSGY vs ANSLF Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, ANSLF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while ANSLF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas ANSLF's P/E ratio is 22.22. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ANSLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY and ANSLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSSGY vs GRRMF Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, GRRMF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while GRRMF trades at $73.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas GRRMF's P/E ratio is 28.60. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GRRMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY and GRRMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSSGY vs TCHBF Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, TCHBF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while TCHBF trades at $200.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas TCHBF's P/E ratio is 31.06. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TCHBF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY and TCHBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSSGY vs TCGGY Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, TCGGY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while TCGGY trades at $34.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas TCGGY's P/E ratio is 26.84. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TCGGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY and TCGGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSSGY vs EKTAY Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, EKTAY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while EKTAY trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas EKTAY's P/E ratio is 86.72. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EKTAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY is less volatile compared to EKTAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSSGY.
SSSGY vs EKTAF Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, EKTAF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while EKTAF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas EKTAF's P/E ratio is 83.33. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EKTAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY and EKTAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSSGY vs BOEUF Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, BOEUF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while BOEUF trades at $25.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas BOEUF's P/E ratio is 135.53. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BOEUF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY and BOEUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSSGY vs NPRRF Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, NPRRF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while NPRRF trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas NPRRF's P/E ratio is 44.74. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NPRRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY and NPRRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSSGY vs TGLVY Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, TGLVY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while TGLVY trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas TGLVY's P/E ratio is 75.86. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TGLVY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY and TGLVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSSGY vs BITGF Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, BITGF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while BITGF trades at $14.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas BITGF's P/E ratio is 45.06. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BITGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY and BITGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSSGY vs PBHDF Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, PBHDF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while PBHDF trades at $19.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas PBHDF's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PBHDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY and PBHDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSSGY vs TDVXF Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, TDVXF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while TDVXF trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas TDVXF's P/E ratio is 65.63. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TDVXF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY and TDVXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSSGY vs KSRBF Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, KSRBF has a market cap of 866.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while KSRBF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas KSRBF's P/E ratio is 4.87. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KSRBF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY is less volatile compared to KSRBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSSGY.
SSSGY vs NNCSF Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, NNCSF has a market cap of 865.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while NNCSF trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas NNCSF's P/E ratio is 95.00. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NNCSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY is less volatile compared to NNCSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSSGY.
SSSGY vs SHWGY Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, SHWGY has a market cap of 788.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while SHWGY trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas SHWGY's P/E ratio is 11.16. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SHWGY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY and SHWGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSSGY vs SPMXF Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, SPMXF has a market cap of 550.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while SPMXF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas SPMXF's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SPMXF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY and SPMXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSSGY vs SAFLF Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, SAFLF has a market cap of 544.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while SAFLF trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas SAFLF's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SAFLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY is less volatile compared to SAFLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSSGY.
SSSGY vs JNDOF Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, JNDOF has a market cap of 531M. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while JNDOF trades at $22.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas JNDOF's P/E ratio is 47.40. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JNDOF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY is less volatile compared to JNDOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSSGY.
SSSGY vs HGYMF Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, HGYMF has a market cap of 510.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while HGYMF trades at $23.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas HGYMF's P/E ratio is 32.86. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HGYMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY is less volatile compared to HGYMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSSGY.
SSSGY vs CLHLF Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, CLHLF has a market cap of 455.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while CLHLF trades at $76.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas CLHLF's P/E ratio is 34.82. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CLHLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY is less volatile compared to CLHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSSGY.
SSSGY vs SAFLY Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, SAFLY has a market cap of 449.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while SAFLY trades at $2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas SAFLY's P/E ratio is 223.00. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SAFLY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY is less volatile compared to SAFLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSSGY.
SSSGY vs GUERF Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, GUERF has a market cap of 281M. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while GUERF trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas GUERF's P/E ratio is 8.19. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GUERF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY and GUERF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSSGY vs TSNLF Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, TSNLF has a market cap of 252.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while TSNLF trades at $5.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas TSNLF's P/E ratio is 33.06. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TSNLF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY is less volatile compared to TSNLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSSGY.
SSSGY vs OPSSF Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, OPSSF has a market cap of 247.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while OPSSF trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas OPSSF's P/E ratio is -26.74. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OPSSF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY is less volatile compared to OPSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSSGY.
SSSGY vs MCDA Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, MCDA has a market cap of 212M. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while MCDA trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas MCDA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MCDA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY is less volatile compared to MCDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSSGY.
SSSGY vs EEOIF Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, EEOIF has a market cap of 63.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while EEOIF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas EEOIF's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EEOIF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY and EEOIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSSGY vs UEEC Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, UEEC has a market cap of 53.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while UEEC trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas UEEC's P/E ratio is -20.82. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UEEC's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY is less volatile compared to UEEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSSGY.
SSSGY vs IMTH Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, IMTH has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while IMTH trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas IMTH's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IMTH's ROE of +2.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY is less volatile compared to IMTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSSGY.
SSSGY vs GVDI Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, GVDI has a market cap of 16.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while GVDI trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas GVDI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GVDI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY is less volatile compared to GVDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSSGY.
SSSGY vs OTCFF Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, OTCFF has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while OTCFF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas OTCFF's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OTCFF's ROE of +18.74%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY is less volatile compared to OTCFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSSGY.
SSSGY vs OJSY Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, OJSY has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while OJSY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas OJSY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OJSY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY is less volatile compared to OJSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSSGY.
SSSGY vs YBGJ Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, YBGJ has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while YBGJ trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas YBGJ's P/E ratio is -3.35. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to YBGJ's ROE of +3.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY is less volatile compared to YBGJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSSGY.
SSSGY vs TUTH Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, TUTH has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while TUTH trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas TUTH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TUTH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY and TUTH have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSSGY vs BLMHF Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, BLMHF has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while BLMHF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas BLMHF's P/E ratio is 1.56. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BLMHF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY and BLMHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSSGY vs CBSC Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, CBSC has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while CBSC trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas CBSC's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CBSC's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY and CBSC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSSGY vs PXMVF Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, PXMVF has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while PXMVF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas PXMVF's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PXMVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY is less volatile compared to PXMVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSSGY.
SSSGY vs RSCF Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, RSCF has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while RSCF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas RSCF's P/E ratio is -5.34. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RSCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY is less volatile compared to RSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSSGY.
SSSGY vs ECIA Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, ECIA has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while ECIA trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas ECIA's P/E ratio is -7.68. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ECIA's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY is less volatile compared to ECIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSSGY.
SSSGY vs NSTGQ Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, NSTGQ has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while NSTGQ trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas NSTGQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NSTGQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY is less volatile compared to NSTGQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSSGY.
SSSGY vs REMI Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, REMI has a market cap of 419.9K. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while REMI trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas REMI's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to REMI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY and REMI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSSGY vs PDMI Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, PDMI has a market cap of 324.9K. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while PDMI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas PDMI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PDMI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY and PDMI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSSGY vs WHSI Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, WHSI has a market cap of 182.7K. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while WHSI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas WHSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WHSI's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY and WHSI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSSGY vs QTXB Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, QTXB has a market cap of 118K. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while QTXB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas QTXB's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to QTXB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY is less volatile compared to QTXB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSSGY.
SSSGY vs CEOS Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, CEOS has a market cap of 88.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while CEOS trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas CEOS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CEOS's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY is less volatile compared to CEOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSSGY.
SSSGY vs SVSO Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, SVSO has a market cap of 63.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while SVSO trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas SVSO's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SVSO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY is less volatile compared to SVSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSSGY.
SSSGY vs SDCCQ Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, SDCCQ has a market cap of 40.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while SDCCQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas SDCCQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SDCCQ's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY and SDCCQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSSGY vs LANZ Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, LANZ has a market cap of 27.7K. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while LANZ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas LANZ's P/E ratio is 1.00. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LANZ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY and LANZ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSSGY vs GMVDF Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, GMVDF has a market cap of 26K. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while GMVDF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas GMVDF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GMVDF's ROE of +3.68%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY and GMVDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSSGY vs VSMD Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, VSMD has a market cap of 22.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while VSMD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas VSMD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VSMD's ROE of +3.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY is less volatile compared to VSMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSSGY.
SSSGY vs ASFX Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, ASFX has a market cap of 17.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while ASFX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas ASFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ASFX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY and ASFX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSSGY vs MDIT Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, MDIT has a market cap of 17.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while MDIT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas MDIT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MDIT's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY is less volatile compared to MDIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSSGY.
SSSGY vs INND Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, INND has a market cap of 14.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while INND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas INND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to INND's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY is less volatile compared to INND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSSGY.
SSSGY vs LFPI Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, LFPI has a market cap of 10.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while LFPI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas LFPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LFPI's ROE of -4.85%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY is less volatile compared to LFPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSSGY.
SSSGY vs SECI Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, SECI has a market cap of 9.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while SECI trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas SECI's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SECI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY is less volatile compared to SECI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSSGY.
SSSGY vs DGEN Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, DGEN has a market cap of 3.9K. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while DGEN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas DGEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DGEN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY and DGEN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSSGY vs BLFE Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, BLFE has a market cap of 1.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while BLFE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas BLFE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BLFE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY and BLFE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSSGY vs SEYE Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, SEYE has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while SEYE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas SEYE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SEYE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY and SEYE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSSGY vs ADLI Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, ADLI has a market cap of 1K. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while ADLI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas ADLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ADLI's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY is less volatile compared to ADLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSSGY.
SSSGY vs HRAL Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, HRAL has a market cap of 396. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while HRAL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas HRAL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HRAL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY is less volatile compared to HRAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSSGY.
SSSGY vs MICRD Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, MICRD has a market cap of 317. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while MICRD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas MICRD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MICRD's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY and MICRD have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSSGY vs RGBOQ Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, RGBOQ has a market cap of 97. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while RGBOQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas RGBOQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RGBOQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY and RGBOQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSSGY vs BGMD Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, BGMD has a market cap of 11. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while BGMD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas BGMD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BGMD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY and BGMD have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSSGY vs VTEQ Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, VTEQ has a market cap of 1. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while VTEQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas VTEQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VTEQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY and VTEQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSSGY vs OCPNY Comparison
SSSGY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSSGY stands at 76.7B. In comparison, OCPNY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SSSGY is priced at $42.11, while OCPNY trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 135.84, whereas OCPNY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSSGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OCPNY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SSSGY and OCPNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).