Sixty Six Oilfield Services, Inc.
Sixty Six Oilfield Services, Inc. SSOF Peers
See (SSOF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SSOF | $0.00 | +0.00% | 139956.00 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| TNRSF | $17.05 | N/A | 18.58B | 10.40 | $1.64 | +3.93% |
| CHOLF | $0.77 | -18.95% | 6.75B | 7.70 | $0.10 | +3.83% |
| THNPY | $36.11 | +2.64% | 6.43B | 14.80 | $2.44 | +1.71% |
| THNPF | $34.97 | N/A | 6.11B | 14.27 | $2.45 | +1.77% |
| GZPZF | $147.38 | N/A | 5.46B | 13.90 | $10.60 | +3.98% |
| SUBCY | $16.70 | +1.09% | 5.01B | 26.09 | $0.64 | +1.68% |
| WYGPY | $8.94 | +0.56% | 4.73B | 19.43 | $0.46 | +3.30% |
| ACGYF | $15.93 | -0.44% | 4.71B | 24.89 | $0.64 | +0.17% |
| SAPMF | $2.37 | +30.94% | 4.64B | 13.94 | $0.17 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SSOF vs TNRSF Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, TNRSF has a market cap of 18.58B. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while TNRSF trades at $17.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TNRSF's P/E ratio is 10.40. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TNRSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF is less volatile compared to TNRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSOF.
SSOF vs CHOLF Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, CHOLF has a market cap of 6.75B. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while CHOLF trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHOLF's P/E ratio is 7.70. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CHOLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF is less volatile compared to CHOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSOF.
SSOF vs THNPY Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, THNPY has a market cap of 6.43B. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while THNPY trades at $36.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THNPY's P/E ratio is 14.80. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to THNPY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF is less volatile compared to THNPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSOF.
SSOF vs THNPF Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, THNPF has a market cap of 6.11B. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while THNPF trades at $34.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THNPF's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to THNPF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF and THNPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSOF vs GZPZF Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, GZPZF has a market cap of 5.46B. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while GZPZF trades at $147.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GZPZF's P/E ratio is 13.90. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GZPZF's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF is less volatile compared to GZPZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSOF.
SSOF vs SUBCY Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, SUBCY has a market cap of 5.01B. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while SUBCY trades at $16.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUBCY's P/E ratio is 26.09. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SUBCY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF is less volatile compared to SUBCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSOF.
SSOF vs WYGPY Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, WYGPY has a market cap of 4.73B. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while WYGPY trades at $8.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WYGPY's P/E ratio is 19.43. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WYGPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF and WYGPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSOF vs ACGYF Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, ACGYF has a market cap of 4.71B. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while ACGYF trades at $15.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACGYF's P/E ratio is 24.89. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ACGYF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF is less volatile compared to ACGYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSOF.
SSOF vs SAPMF Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, SAPMF has a market cap of 4.64B. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while SAPMF trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAPMF's P/E ratio is 13.94. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SAPMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF is less volatile compared to SAPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSOF.
SSOF vs AKRYY Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, AKRYY has a market cap of 4.34B. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while AKRYY trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AKRYY's P/E ratio is 8.49. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AKRYY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF is less volatile compared to AKRYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSOF.
SSOF vs WYGPF Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, WYGPF has a market cap of 3.77B. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while WYGPF trades at $7.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WYGPF's P/E ratio is 15.48. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WYGPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF is less volatile compared to WYGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSOF.
SSOF vs SBFFF Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, SBFFF has a market cap of 3.66B. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while SBFFF trades at $21.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBFFF's P/E ratio is 25.48. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SBFFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF is less volatile compared to SBFFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSOF.
SSOF vs SBFFY Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, SBFFY has a market cap of 3.37B. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while SBFFY trades at $19.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBFFY's P/E ratio is 23.46. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SBFFY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF is less volatile compared to SBFFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSOF.
SSOF vs TRRVF Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, TRRVF has a market cap of 2.42B. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while TRRVF trades at $124.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRRVF's P/E ratio is 45.76. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TRRVF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF is less volatile compared to TRRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSOF.
SSOF vs TGSNF Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, TGSNF has a market cap of 1.63B. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while TGSNF trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TGSNF's P/E ratio is 14.56. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TGSNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF and TGSNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSOF vs CIMEF Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, CIMEF has a market cap of 1.49B. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while CIMEF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIMEF's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CIMEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF is less volatile compared to CIMEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSOF.
SSOF vs AKRTF Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, AKRTF has a market cap of 1.33B. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while AKRTF trades at $2.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AKRTF's P/E ratio is 5.23. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AKRTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF is less volatile compared to AKRTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSOF.
SSOF vs MDIKF Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, MDIKF has a market cap of 1.25B. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while MDIKF trades at $18.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDIKF's P/E ratio is 6.22. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MDIKF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF is less volatile compared to MDIKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSOF.
SSOF vs GZPZY Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, GZPZY has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while GZPZY trades at $29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GZPZY's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GZPZY's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF is less volatile compared to GZPZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSOF.
SSOF vs CESDF Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, CESDF has a market cap of 1.02B. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while CESDF trades at $4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CESDF's P/E ratio is 8.23. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CESDF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF is less volatile compared to CESDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSOF.
SSOF vs PGEJF Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, PGEJF has a market cap of 859.02M. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while PGEJF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PGEJF's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PGEJF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF and PGEJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSOF vs SAWLF Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, SAWLF has a market cap of 797.99M. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while SAWLF trades at $11.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAWLF's P/E ratio is -19.54. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SAWLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF is less volatile compared to SAWLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSOF.
SSOF vs PSYTF Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, PSYTF has a market cap of 670.40M. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while PSYTF trades at $8.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSYTF's P/E ratio is 12.79. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSYTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF is less volatile compared to PSYTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSOF.
SSOF vs TOLWF Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, TOLWF has a market cap of 597.70M. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while TOLWF trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOLWF's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TOLWF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF is less volatile compared to TOLWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSOF.
SSOF vs HNTIY Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, HNTIY has a market cap of 585.25M. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while HNTIY trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HNTIY's P/E ratio is -20.61. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HNTIY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF and HNTIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSOF vs SBOEF Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, SBOEF has a market cap of 527.47M. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while SBOEF trades at $33.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBOEF's P/E ratio is 9.27. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SBOEF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF is less volatile compared to SBOEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSOF.
SSOF vs HNTIF Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, HNTIF has a market cap of 520.57M. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while HNTIF trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HNTIF's P/E ratio is -18.33. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HNTIF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF is less volatile compared to HNTIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSOF.
SSOF vs ATONF Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, ATONF has a market cap of 411.67M. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while ATONF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATONF's P/E ratio is 13.90. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ATONF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF is less volatile compared to ATONF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSOF.
SSOF vs ATONY Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, ATONY has a market cap of 381.86M. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while ATONY trades at $25.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATONY's P/E ratio is 11.21. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ATONY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF is less volatile compared to ATONY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSOF.
SSOF vs CGGYY Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, CGGYY has a market cap of 324.63M. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while CGGYY trades at $41.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGGYY's P/E ratio is 43.44. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CGGYY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF is less volatile compared to CGGYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSOF.
SSOF vs AKKVF Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, AKKVF has a market cap of 299.40M. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while AKKVF trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AKKVF's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AKKVF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF is less volatile compared to AKKVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSOF.
SSOF vs TOTZF Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, TOTZF has a market cap of 280.15M. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while TOTZF trades at $7.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOTZF's P/E ratio is 6.69. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TOTZF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF is less volatile compared to TOTZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSOF.
SSOF vs SHANF Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, SHANF has a market cap of 270.25M. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while SHANF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHANF's P/E ratio is -3.25. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SHANF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF is less volatile compared to SHANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSOF.
SSOF vs DDHLF Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, DDHLF has a market cap of 234.30M. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while DDHLF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DDHLF's P/E ratio is 8.29. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DDHLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF and DDHLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSOF vs BLYFF Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, BLYFF has a market cap of 233.71M. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while BLYFF trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLYFF's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BLYFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF and BLYFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSOF vs PDER Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, PDER has a market cap of 211.71M. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while PDER trades at $322.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PDER's P/E ratio is 13.31. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PDER's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF is less volatile compared to PDER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSOF.
SSOF vs CFWFF Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, CFWFF has a market cap of 207.85M. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while CFWFF trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFWFF's P/E ratio is 34.57. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CFWFF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF is less volatile compared to CFWFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSOF.
SSOF vs SNVVF Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, SNVVF has a market cap of 200.83M. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while SNVVF trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNVVF's P/E ratio is 279.00. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SNVVF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF and SNVVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSOF vs JUTOY Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, JUTOY has a market cap of 177.43M. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while JUTOY trades at $20.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JUTOY's P/E ratio is 3.33. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JUTOY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF is less volatile compared to JUTOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSOF.
SSOF vs PKDC Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, PKDC has a market cap of 165.49M. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while PKDC trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PKDC's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PKDC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF and PKDC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSOF vs WFTSF Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, WFTSF has a market cap of 149.64M. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while WFTSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WFTSF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WFTSF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF is less volatile compared to WFTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSOF.
SSOF vs POFCY Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, POFCY has a market cap of 125.30M. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while POFCY trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POFCY's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to POFCY's ROE of +1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF is less volatile compared to POFCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSOF.
SSOF vs SCEYF Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, SCEYF has a market cap of 121.03M. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while SCEYF trades at $8.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCEYF's P/E ratio is 5.42. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SCEYF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF is less volatile compared to SCEYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSOF.
SSOF vs ETOLF Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, ETOLF has a market cap of 95.36M. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while ETOLF trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ETOLF's P/E ratio is 24.60. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ETOLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF and ETOLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSOF vs PLSDF Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, PLSDF has a market cap of 92.45M. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while PLSDF trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLSDF's P/E ratio is 9.10. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PLSDF's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF and PLSDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSOF vs QSEP Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, QSEP has a market cap of 90.75M. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while QSEP trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QSEP's P/E ratio is -19.90. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QSEP's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF is less volatile compared to QSEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSOF.
SSOF vs PRSEF Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, PRSEF has a market cap of 88.45M. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while PRSEF trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRSEF's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRSEF's ROE of -4.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF is less volatile compared to PRSEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSOF.
SSOF vs MCCRF Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, MCCRF has a market cap of 68.49M. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while MCCRF trades at $2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCCRF's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MCCRF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF is less volatile compared to MCCRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSOF.
SSOF vs CAWLF Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, CAWLF has a market cap of 65.31M. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while CAWLF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAWLF's P/E ratio is 2.10. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CAWLF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF and CAWLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSOF vs GWTI Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, GWTI has a market cap of 36.31M. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while GWTI trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GWTI's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GWTI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF and GWTI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSOF vs EEYUF Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, EEYUF has a market cap of 35.77M. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while EEYUF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EEYUF's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EEYUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF is less volatile compared to EEYUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSOF.
SSOF vs POFCF Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, POFCF has a market cap of 31.53M. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while POFCF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POFCF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to POFCF's ROE of +1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF is less volatile compared to POFCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSOF.
SSOF vs QDRSF Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, QDRSF has a market cap of 28.20M. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while QDRSF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QDRSF's P/E ratio is -6.33. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QDRSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF and QDRSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSOF vs KLNG Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, KLNG has a market cap of 26.51M. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while KLNG trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KLNG's P/E ratio is 10.19. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KLNG's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF is less volatile compared to KLNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSOF.
SSOF vs BWTX Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, BWTX has a market cap of 21.26M. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while BWTX trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BWTX's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BWTX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF is less volatile compared to BWTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSOF.
SSOF vs NSFDF Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, NSFDF has a market cap of 20.35M. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while NSFDF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSFDF's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NSFDF's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF and NSFDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSOF vs WEIIF Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, WEIIF has a market cap of 15.58M. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while WEIIF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WEIIF's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WEIIF's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF and WEIIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSOF vs ENGT Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, ENGT has a market cap of 13.24M. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while ENGT trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENGT's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ENGT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF is less volatile compared to ENGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSOF.
SSOF vs FOYJ Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, FOYJ has a market cap of 12.31M. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while FOYJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FOYJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FOYJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF is less volatile compared to FOYJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSOF.
SSOF vs HGHAF Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, HGHAF has a market cap of 7.62M. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while HGHAF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HGHAF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HGHAF's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF and HGHAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSOF vs CGPVF Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, CGPVF has a market cap of 7.02M. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while CGPVF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGPVF's P/E ratio is 1.03. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CGPVF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF is less volatile compared to CGPVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSOF.
SSOF vs TAGP Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, TAGP has a market cap of 6.86M. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while TAGP trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TAGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TAGP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF and TAGP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSOF vs BRYFF Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, BRYFF has a market cap of 5.29M. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while BRYFF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRYFF's P/E ratio is -1.82. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BRYFF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF is less volatile compared to BRYFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSOF.
SSOF vs OXFCF Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, OXFCF has a market cap of 4.96M. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while OXFCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OXFCF's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OXFCF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF and OXFCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSOF vs CTNR Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, CTNR has a market cap of 2.63M. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while CTNR trades at $5.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTNR's P/E ratio is 64.38. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CTNR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF is less volatile compared to CTNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSOF.
SSOF vs TXLZF Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, TXLZF has a market cap of 2.48M. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while TXLZF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TXLZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TXLZF's ROE of -4.57%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF is less volatile compared to TXLZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSOF.
SSOF vs NWPIF Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, NWPIF has a market cap of 2.04M. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while NWPIF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NWPIF's P/E ratio is 1.85. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NWPIF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF and NWPIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSOF vs GLFH Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, GLFH has a market cap of 1.22M. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while GLFH trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLFH's P/E ratio is -37.50. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLFH's ROE of -12.85%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF is less volatile compared to GLFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSOF.
SSOF vs SKPO Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, SKPO has a market cap of 1.08M. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while SKPO trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKPO's P/E ratio is -2.75. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SKPO's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF is less volatile compared to SKPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSOF.
SSOF vs IRIG Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, IRIG has a market cap of 440500.00. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while IRIG trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IRIG's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IRIG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF is less volatile compared to IRIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSOF.
SSOF vs SMGI Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, SMGI has a market cap of 307821.00. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while SMGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMGI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMGI's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF and SMGI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSOF vs CSSV Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, CSSV has a market cap of 210630.00. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while CSSV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSSV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSSV's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF and CSSV have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSOF vs FSEI Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, FSEI has a market cap of 145052.00. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while FSEI trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSEI's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSEI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF is less volatile compared to FSEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSOF.
SSOF vs IESCF Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, IESCF has a market cap of 137338.00. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while IESCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IESCF's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IESCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF and IESCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSOF vs PKDCW Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, PKDCW has a market cap of 71676.00. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while PKDCW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PKDCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PKDCW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF is less volatile compared to PKDCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSOF.
SSOF vs GPTC Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, GPTC has a market cap of 67658.00. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while GPTC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPTC's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GPTC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF is less volatile compared to GPTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSOF.
SSOF vs WWNG Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, WWNG has a market cap of 28641.00. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while WWNG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WWNG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WWNG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF is less volatile compared to WWNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSOF.
SSOF vs USEI Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, USEI has a market cap of 26308.00. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while USEI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USEI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USEI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF is less volatile compared to USEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSOF.
SSOF vs CPYJ Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, CPYJ has a market cap of 24400.00. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while CPYJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPYJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CPYJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF is less volatile compared to CPYJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSOF.
SSOF vs SGUJ Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, SGUJ has a market cap of 15982.00. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while SGUJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGUJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGUJ's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF and SGUJ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSOF vs TEGR Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, TEGR has a market cap of 12651.00. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while TEGR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TEGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TEGR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF and TEGR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSOF vs AURI Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, AURI has a market cap of 9105.00. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while AURI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AURI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AURI's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF and AURI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSOF vs RTSO Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, RTSO has a market cap of 6667.00. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while RTSO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RTSO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RTSO's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF and RTSO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSOF vs SUBB Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, SUBB has a market cap of 6004.00. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while SUBB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUBB's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SUBB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF is less volatile compared to SUBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSOF.
SSOF vs TXGE Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, TXGE has a market cap of 5653.00. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while TXGE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TXGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TXGE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF and TXGE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSOF vs LNDT Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, LNDT has a market cap of 3645.00. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while LNDT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNDT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LNDT's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF and LNDT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSOF vs CTBG Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, CTBG has a market cap of 3126.00. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while CTBG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTBG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CTBG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF and CTBG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSOF vs BMMCF Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, BMMCF has a market cap of 2905.00. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while BMMCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BMMCF's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BMMCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF is less volatile compared to BMMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSOF.
SSOF vs PTOG Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, PTOG has a market cap of 2524.00. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while PTOG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTOG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PTOG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF is less volatile compared to PTOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSOF.
SSOF vs AMCF Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, AMCF has a market cap of 1026.00. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while AMCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMCF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF is less volatile compared to AMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSOF.
SSOF vs CDVIQ Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, CDVIQ has a market cap of 986.00. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while CDVIQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDVIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CDVIQ's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF is less volatile compared to CDVIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSOF.
SSOF vs POOSF Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, POOSF has a market cap of 811.00. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while POOSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POOSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to POOSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF is less volatile compared to POOSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSOF.
SSOF vs EHYD Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, EHYD has a market cap of 603.00. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while EHYD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EHYD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EHYD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF and EHYD have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSOF vs NNYR Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, NNYR has a market cap of 234.00. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while NNYR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NNYR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NNYR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF and NNYR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSOF vs SYNE Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, SYNE has a market cap of 158.00. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while SYNE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYNE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SYNE's ROE of -59.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF is less volatile compared to SYNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSOF.
SSOF vs ALRY Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, ALRY has a market cap of 117.00. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while ALRY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALRY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ALRY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF and ALRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSOF vs ISYX Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, ISYX has a market cap of 102.00. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while ISYX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISYX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ISYX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF and ISYX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SSOF vs CHMR Comparison
SSOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSOF stands at 139956.00. In comparison, CHMR has a market cap of 66.00. Regarding current trading prices, SSOF is priced at $0.00, while CHMR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHMR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSOF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CHMR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SSOF and CHMR have similar daily volatility (0.00).