SolarWorld AG
SolarWorld AG (SRWRF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SRWRF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Solar Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRWRF | $0.05 | +0.00% | 744.8K | -0.02 | -$2.31 | N/A |
| GCPEF | $0.15 | -6.25% | 4.2B | -5.00 | -$0.03 | N/A |
| XISHY | $8.30 | -0.54% | 3.7B | -276.67 | -$0.03 | +1.09% |
| XNYIF | $0.40 | +0.00% | 3.6B | 20.08 | $0.02 | +1.34% |
| SMTGY | $2.61 | -2.25% | 905.7M | -3.78 | -$0.69 | N/A |
| SMTGF | $26.04 | +0.00% | 903.6M | -3.80 | -$6.85 | +2.00% |
| GRMZF | $11.30 | +0.00% | 261.1M | 21.32 | $0.53 | +4.72% |
| SEHLF | $0.05 | +1.56% | 173.5M | -5.22 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| HYSR | $0.03 | -6.06% | 170.2M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| CSSXF | $0.03 | +0.00% | 75.6M | -3.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SRWRF vs GCPEF Comparison August 2025
SRWRF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRWRF stands at 744.8K. In comparison, GCPEF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SRWRF is priced at $0.05, while GCPEF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GCPEF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, SRWRF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GCPEF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SRWRF is more volatile compared to GCPEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRWRF.Check GCPEF's competition here
SRWRF vs XISHY Comparison August 2025
SRWRF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRWRF stands at 744.8K. In comparison, XISHY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SRWRF is priced at $0.05, while XISHY trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas XISHY's P/E ratio is -276.67. In terms of profitability, SRWRF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XISHY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SRWRF is more volatile compared to XISHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRWRF.Check XISHY's competition here
SRWRF vs XNYIF Comparison August 2025
SRWRF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRWRF stands at 744.8K. In comparison, XNYIF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SRWRF is priced at $0.05, while XNYIF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas XNYIF's P/E ratio is 20.08. In terms of profitability, SRWRF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XNYIF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SRWRF is more volatile compared to XNYIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRWRF.Check XNYIF's competition here
SRWRF vs SMTGY Comparison August 2025
SRWRF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRWRF stands at 744.8K. In comparison, SMTGY has a market cap of 905.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SRWRF is priced at $0.05, while SMTGY trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SMTGY's P/E ratio is -3.78. In terms of profitability, SRWRF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMTGY's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SRWRF is more volatile compared to SMTGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRWRF.Check SMTGY's competition here
SRWRF vs SMTGF Comparison August 2025
SRWRF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRWRF stands at 744.8K. In comparison, SMTGF has a market cap of 903.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SRWRF is priced at $0.05, while SMTGF trades at $26.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SMTGF's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, SRWRF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMTGF's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SRWRF is more volatile compared to SMTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRWRF.Check SMTGF's competition here
SRWRF vs GRMZF Comparison August 2025
SRWRF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRWRF stands at 744.8K. In comparison, GRMZF has a market cap of 261.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SRWRF is priced at $0.05, while GRMZF trades at $11.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GRMZF's P/E ratio is 21.32. In terms of profitability, SRWRF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GRMZF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SRWRF is more volatile compared to GRMZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRWRF.Check GRMZF's competition here
SRWRF vs SEHLF Comparison August 2025
SRWRF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRWRF stands at 744.8K. In comparison, SEHLF has a market cap of 173.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SRWRF is priced at $0.05, while SEHLF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SEHLF's P/E ratio is -5.22. In terms of profitability, SRWRF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEHLF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SRWRF is more volatile compared to SEHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRWRF.Check SEHLF's competition here
SRWRF vs HYSR Comparison August 2025
SRWRF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRWRF stands at 744.8K. In comparison, HYSR has a market cap of 170.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SRWRF is priced at $0.05, while HYSR trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas HYSR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRWRF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HYSR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SRWRF is more volatile compared to HYSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRWRF.Check HYSR's competition here
SRWRF vs CSSXF Comparison August 2025
SRWRF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRWRF stands at 744.8K. In comparison, CSSXF has a market cap of 75.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SRWRF is priced at $0.05, while CSSXF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CSSXF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, SRWRF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSSXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SRWRF is more volatile compared to CSSXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRWRF.Check CSSXF's competition here
SRWRF vs SPRQF Comparison August 2025
SRWRF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRWRF stands at 744.8K. In comparison, SPRQF has a market cap of 62.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SRWRF is priced at $0.05, while SPRQF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SPRQF's P/E ratio is -13.36. In terms of profitability, SRWRF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPRQF's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SRWRF is more volatile compared to SPRQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRWRF.Check SPRQF's competition here
SRWRF vs UGEIF Comparison August 2025
SRWRF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRWRF stands at 744.8K. In comparison, UGEIF has a market cap of 49.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SRWRF is priced at $0.05, while UGEIF trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas UGEIF's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, SRWRF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UGEIF's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SRWRF is more volatile compared to UGEIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRWRF.Check UGEIF's competition here
SRWRF vs CVUEF Comparison August 2025
SRWRF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRWRF stands at 744.8K. In comparison, CVUEF has a market cap of 42.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SRWRF is priced at $0.05, while CVUEF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CVUEF's P/E ratio is -5.09. In terms of profitability, SRWRF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CVUEF's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SRWRF is more volatile compared to CVUEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRWRF.Check CVUEF's competition here
SRWRF vs FLDI Comparison August 2025
SRWRF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRWRF stands at 744.8K. In comparison, FLDI has a market cap of 22.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SRWRF is priced at $0.05, while FLDI trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas FLDI's P/E ratio is -750.00. In terms of profitability, SRWRF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLDI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SRWRF is more volatile compared to FLDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRWRF.Check FLDI's competition here
SRWRF vs PXPC Comparison August 2025
SRWRF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRWRF stands at 744.8K. In comparison, PXPC has a market cap of 21.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SRWRF is priced at $0.05, while PXPC trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PXPC's P/E ratio is -46.43. In terms of profitability, SRWRF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PXPC's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, SRWRF is less volatile compared to PXPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRWRF.Check PXPC's competition here
SRWRF vs NEWH Comparison August 2025
SRWRF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRWRF stands at 744.8K. In comparison, NEWH has a market cap of 19.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SRWRF is priced at $0.05, while NEWH trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NEWH's P/E ratio is -2.68. In terms of profitability, SRWRF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NEWH's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SRWRF is more volatile compared to NEWH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRWRF.Check NEWH's competition here
SRWRF vs CBUTF Comparison August 2025
SRWRF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRWRF stands at 744.8K. In comparison, CBUTF has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SRWRF is priced at $0.05, while CBUTF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CBUTF's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, SRWRF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CBUTF's ROE of +1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, SRWRF is more volatile compared to CBUTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRWRF.Check CBUTF's competition here
SRWRF vs NTCXF Comparison August 2025
SRWRF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRWRF stands at 744.8K. In comparison, NTCXF has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SRWRF is priced at $0.05, while NTCXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NTCXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRWRF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NTCXF's ROE of +0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, SRWRF is more volatile compared to NTCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRWRF.Check NTCXF's competition here
SRWRF vs SAENF Comparison August 2025
SRWRF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRWRF stands at 744.8K. In comparison, SAENF has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SRWRF is priced at $0.05, while SAENF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SAENF's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, SRWRF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SAENF's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SRWRF is more volatile compared to SAENF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRWRF.Check SAENF's competition here
SRWRF vs AACTF Comparison August 2025
SRWRF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRWRF stands at 744.8K. In comparison, AACTF has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SRWRF is priced at $0.05, while AACTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AACTF's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, SRWRF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AACTF's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, SRWRF is more volatile compared to AACTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRWRF.Check AACTF's competition here
SRWRF vs TSPG Comparison August 2025
SRWRF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRWRF stands at 744.8K. In comparison, TSPG has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SRWRF is priced at $0.05, while TSPG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TSPG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRWRF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TSPG's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SRWRF is more volatile compared to TSPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRWRF.Check TSPG's competition here
SRWRF vs PTOS Comparison August 2025
SRWRF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRWRF stands at 744.8K. In comparison, PTOS has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SRWRF is priced at $0.05, while PTOS trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PTOS's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, SRWRF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PTOS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SRWRF is more volatile compared to PTOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRWRF.Check PTOS's competition here
SRWRF vs SIRC Comparison August 2025
SRWRF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRWRF stands at 744.8K. In comparison, SIRC has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SRWRF is priced at $0.05, while SIRC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SIRC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRWRF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SIRC's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SRWRF is more volatile compared to SIRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRWRF.Check SIRC's competition here
SRWRF vs QCLSF Comparison August 2025
SRWRF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRWRF stands at 744.8K. In comparison, QCLSF has a market cap of 722.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SRWRF is priced at $0.05, while QCLSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas QCLSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRWRF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QCLSF's ROE of -1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SRWRF is more volatile compared to QCLSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRWRF.Check QCLSF's competition here
SRWRF vs ANTGF Comparison August 2025
SRWRF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRWRF stands at 744.8K. In comparison, ANTGF has a market cap of 578K. Regarding current trading prices, SRWRF is priced at $0.05, while ANTGF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ANTGF's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, SRWRF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ANTGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SRWRF is more volatile compared to ANTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRWRF.Check ANTGF's competition here
SRWRF vs PSWW Comparison August 2025
SRWRF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRWRF stands at 744.8K. In comparison, PSWW has a market cap of 158.9K. Regarding current trading prices, SRWRF is priced at $0.05, while PSWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PSWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRWRF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSWW's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SRWRF is less volatile compared to PSWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRWRF.Check PSWW's competition here
SRWRF vs UNSS Comparison August 2025
SRWRF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRWRF stands at 744.8K. In comparison, UNSS has a market cap of 60.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SRWRF is priced at $0.05, while UNSS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas UNSS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRWRF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UNSS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SRWRF is more volatile compared to UNSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRWRF.Check UNSS's competition here
SRWRF vs SPSO Comparison August 2025
SRWRF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRWRF stands at 744.8K. In comparison, SPSO has a market cap of 43.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SRWRF is priced at $0.05, while SPSO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SPSO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRWRF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPSO's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, SRWRF is more volatile compared to SPSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRWRF.Check SPSO's competition here
SRWRF vs ABCE Comparison August 2025
SRWRF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRWRF stands at 744.8K. In comparison, ABCE has a market cap of 26.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SRWRF is priced at $0.05, while ABCE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ABCE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SRWRF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ABCE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SRWRF is more volatile compared to ABCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRWRF.Check ABCE's competition here
SRWRF vs OPVS Comparison August 2025
SRWRF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRWRF stands at 744.8K. In comparison, OPVS has a market cap of 24K. Regarding current trading prices, SRWRF is priced at $0.05, while OPVS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas OPVS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SRWRF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OPVS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SRWRF is more volatile compared to OPVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRWRF.Check OPVS's competition here
SRWRF vs CHJI Comparison August 2025
SRWRF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRWRF stands at 744.8K. In comparison, CHJI has a market cap of 19.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SRWRF is priced at $0.05, while CHJI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CHJI's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, SRWRF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CHJI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SRWRF is less volatile compared to CHJI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRWRF.Check CHJI's competition here
SRWRF vs SOEN Comparison August 2025
SRWRF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRWRF stands at 744.8K. In comparison, SOEN has a market cap of 18.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SRWRF is priced at $0.05, while SOEN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SOEN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SRWRF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOEN's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SRWRF is more volatile compared to SOEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRWRF.Check SOEN's competition here
SRWRF vs SNRS Comparison August 2025
SRWRF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRWRF stands at 744.8K. In comparison, SNRS has a market cap of 16.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SRWRF is priced at $0.05, while SNRS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SNRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRWRF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SNRS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SRWRF is more volatile compared to SNRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRWRF.Check SNRS's competition here
SRWRF vs NTAC Comparison August 2025
SRWRF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRWRF stands at 744.8K. In comparison, NTAC has a market cap of 12.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SRWRF is priced at $0.05, while NTAC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NTAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRWRF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NTAC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SRWRF is more volatile compared to NTAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRWRF.Check NTAC's competition here
SRWRF vs XDSL Comparison August 2025
SRWRF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRWRF stands at 744.8K. In comparison, XDSL has a market cap of 8.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SRWRF is priced at $0.05, while XDSL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas XDSL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRWRF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDSL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SRWRF is more volatile compared to XDSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRWRF.Check XDSL's competition here
SRWRF vs MBCI Comparison August 2025
SRWRF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRWRF stands at 744.8K. In comparison, MBCI has a market cap of 7K. Regarding current trading prices, SRWRF is priced at $0.05, while MBCI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MBCI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SRWRF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MBCI's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SRWRF is more volatile compared to MBCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRWRF.Check MBCI's competition here
SRWRF vs SUNWQ Comparison August 2025
SRWRF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRWRF stands at 744.8K. In comparison, SUNWQ has a market cap of 5.7K. Regarding current trading prices, SRWRF is priced at $0.05, while SUNWQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SUNWQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRWRF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SUNWQ's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SRWRF is more volatile compared to SUNWQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRWRF.Check SUNWQ's competition here
SRWRF vs VSOLF Comparison August 2025
SRWRF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRWRF stands at 744.8K. In comparison, VSOLF has a market cap of 4.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SRWRF is priced at $0.05, while VSOLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas VSOLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRWRF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSOLF's ROE of -2.90%. Regarding short-term risk, SRWRF is more volatile compared to VSOLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRWRF.Check VSOLF's competition here
SRWRF vs APVNF Comparison August 2025
SRWRF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRWRF stands at 744.8K. In comparison, APVNF has a market cap of 3.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SRWRF is priced at $0.05, while APVNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas APVNF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SRWRF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to APVNF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, SRWRF is more volatile compared to APVNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRWRF.Check APVNF's competition here
SRWRF vs PPRW Comparison August 2025
SRWRF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRWRF stands at 744.8K. In comparison, PPRW has a market cap of 3.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SRWRF is priced at $0.05, while PPRW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PPRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRWRF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PPRW's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, SRWRF is more volatile compared to PPRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRWRF.Check PPRW's competition here
SRWRF vs GRYG Comparison August 2025
SRWRF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRWRF stands at 744.8K. In comparison, GRYG has a market cap of 3K. Regarding current trading prices, SRWRF is priced at $0.05, while GRYG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GRYG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRWRF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GRYG's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SRWRF is more volatile compared to GRYG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRWRF.Check GRYG's competition here
SRWRF vs EDYYF Comparison August 2025
SRWRF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRWRF stands at 744.8K. In comparison, EDYYF has a market cap of 750. Regarding current trading prices, SRWRF is priced at $0.05, while EDYYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas EDYYF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRWRF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EDYYF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SRWRF is more volatile compared to EDYYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRWRF.Check EDYYF's competition here
SRWRF vs EBODF Comparison August 2025
SRWRF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRWRF stands at 744.8K. In comparison, EBODF has a market cap of 244. Regarding current trading prices, SRWRF is priced at $0.05, while EBODF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas EBODF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRWRF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EBODF's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, SRWRF is less volatile compared to EBODF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRWRF.Check EBODF's competition here
SRWRF vs KOVR Comparison August 2025
SRWRF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRWRF stands at 744.8K. In comparison, KOVR has a market cap of 87. Regarding current trading prices, SRWRF is priced at $0.05, while KOVR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas KOVR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRWRF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KOVR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SRWRF is more volatile compared to KOVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRWRF.Check KOVR's competition here
SRWRF vs IXEH Comparison August 2025
SRWRF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRWRF stands at 744.8K. In comparison, IXEH has a market cap of 72. Regarding current trading prices, SRWRF is priced at $0.05, while IXEH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas IXEH's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SRWRF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IXEH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SRWRF is more volatile compared to IXEH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRWRF.Check IXEH's competition here
SRWRF vs GSLO Comparison August 2025
SRWRF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRWRF stands at 744.8K. In comparison, GSLO has a market cap of 65. Regarding current trading prices, SRWRF is priced at $0.05, while GSLO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GSLO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRWRF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GSLO's ROE of +20.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SRWRF is more volatile compared to GSLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRWRF.Check GSLO's competition here
SRWRF vs ISUNQ Comparison August 2025
SRWRF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRWRF stands at 744.8K. In comparison, ISUNQ has a market cap of 47. Regarding current trading prices, SRWRF is priced at $0.05, while ISUNQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRWRF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ISUNQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRWRF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ISUNQ's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SRWRF is more volatile compared to ISUNQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRWRF.Check ISUNQ's competition here