SigmaRoc plc

SRC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CRH.L has a market cap of 49.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC.L is priced at £114.00, while CRH.L trades at £7,228.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 58.50, whereas CRH.L's P/E ratio is 20.64. In terms of profitability, SRC.L's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CRH.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC.L is more volatile compared to CRH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.L.Check CRH.L's competition here

SRC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0LRK.L has a market cap of 37.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC.L is priced at £114.00, while 0LRK.L trades at £280.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 58.50, whereas 0LRK.L's P/E ratio is 62.30. In terms of profitability, SRC.L's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0LRK.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC.L is more volatile compared to 0LRK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.L.Check 0LRK.L's competition here

SRC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0JZ0.L has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC.L is priced at £114.00, while 0JZ0.L trades at £604.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 58.50, whereas 0JZ0.L's P/E ratio is 57.40. In terms of profitability, SRC.L's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0JZ0.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC.L is more volatile compared to 0JZ0.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.L.Check 0JZ0.L's competition here

SRC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0QKY.L has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC.L is priced at £114.00, while 0QKY.L trades at £41.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 58.50, whereas 0QKY.L's P/E ratio is 11.18. In terms of profitability, SRC.L's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0QKY.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC.L is more volatile compared to 0QKY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.L.Check 0QKY.L's competition here

SRC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0QQ2.L has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC.L is priced at £114.00, while 0QQ2.L trades at £495.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 58.50, whereas 0QQ2.L's P/E ratio is 23.70. In terms of profitability, SRC.L's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0QQ2.L's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC.L is more volatile compared to 0QQ2.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.L.Check 0QQ2.L's competition here

SRC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0JZ1.L has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC.L is priced at £114.00, while 0JZ1.L trades at £70.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 58.50, whereas 0JZ1.L's P/E ratio is 30.94. In terms of profitability, SRC.L's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0JZ1.L's ROE of -4.56%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC.L is more volatile compared to 0JZ1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.L.Check 0JZ1.L's competition here

SRC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0Y5C.L has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC.L is priced at £114.00, while 0Y5C.L trades at £165.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 58.50, whereas 0Y5C.L's P/E ratio is 31.91. In terms of profitability, SRC.L's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0Y5C.L's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC.L is more volatile compared to 0Y5C.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.L.Check 0Y5C.L's competition here

SRC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0RH9.L has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC.L is priced at £114.00, while 0RH9.L trades at £182.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 58.50, whereas 0RH9.L's P/E ratio is 15.38. In terms of profitability, SRC.L's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0RH9.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC.L is more volatile compared to 0RH9.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.L.Check 0RH9.L's competition here

SRC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0M6J.L has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC.L is priced at £114.00, while 0M6J.L trades at £108.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 58.50, whereas 0M6J.L's P/E ratio is 5.62. In terms of profitability, SRC.L's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0M6J.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC.L is more volatile compared to 0M6J.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.L.Check 0M6J.L's competition here

SRC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BREE.L has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC.L is priced at £114.00, while BREE.L trades at £363.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 58.50, whereas BREE.L's P/E ratio is 14.08. In terms of profitability, SRC.L's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BREE.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC.L is more volatile compared to BREE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.L.Check BREE.L's competition here

SRC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0R6S.L has a market cap of 789.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC.L is priced at £114.00, while 0R6S.L trades at £72.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 58.50, whereas 0R6S.L's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, SRC.L's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0R6S.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC.L is more volatile compared to 0R6S.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.L.Check 0R6S.L's competition here

SRC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, JHDA.L has a market cap of 655.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC.L is priced at £114.00, while JHDA.L trades at £75.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 58.50, whereas JHDA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRC.L's ROE is +0.03%, compared to JHDA.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC.L is more volatile compared to JHDA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.L.Check JHDA.L's competition here

SRC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IBST.L has a market cap of 584.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC.L is priced at £114.00, while IBST.L trades at £147.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 58.50, whereas IBST.L's P/E ratio is 37.05. In terms of profitability, SRC.L's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IBST.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC.L is more volatile compared to IBST.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.L.Check IBST.L's competition here

SRC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MSLH.L has a market cap of 510.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC.L is priced at £114.00, while MSLH.L trades at £203.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 58.50, whereas MSLH.L's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, SRC.L's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MSLH.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC.L is less volatile compared to MSLH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.L.Check MSLH.L's competition here

SRC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FORT.L has a market cap of 419.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC.L is priced at £114.00, while FORT.L trades at £197.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 58.50, whereas FORT.L's P/E ratio is 28.43. In terms of profitability, SRC.L's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FORT.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC.L is less volatile compared to FORT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.L.Check FORT.L's competition here

SRC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MBH.L has a market cap of 101.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC.L is priced at £114.00, while MBH.L trades at £107.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 58.50, whereas MBH.L's P/E ratio is 18.33. In terms of profitability, SRC.L's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MBH.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC.L is more volatile compared to MBH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.L.Check MBH.L's competition here

SRC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, STCM.L has a market cap of 35M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC.L is priced at £114.00, while STCM.L trades at £16.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 58.50, whereas STCM.L's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, SRC.L's ROE is +0.03%, compared to STCM.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC.L is less volatile compared to STCM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.L.Check STCM.L's competition here

SRC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0P000147QB.L has a market cap of 12.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC.L is priced at £114.00, while 0P000147QB.L trades at £99.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 58.50, whereas 0P000147QB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRC.L's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0P000147QB.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC.L is more volatile compared to 0P000147QB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.L.Check 0P000147QB.L's competition here

SRC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PU12.L has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC.L is priced at £114.00, while PU12.L trades at £24.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 58.50, whereas PU12.L's P/E ratio is 1.41. In terms of profitability, SRC.L's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PU12.L's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC.L is less volatile compared to PU12.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.L.Check PU12.L's competition here

SRC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ECOB.L has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC.L is priced at £114.00, while ECOB.L trades at £3.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 58.50, whereas ECOB.L's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, SRC.L's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ECOB.L's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC.L is less volatile compared to ECOB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.L.Check ECOB.L's competition here

SRC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 97GM.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SRC.L is priced at £114.00, while 97GM.L trades at £0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 58.50, whereas 97GM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRC.L's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 97GM.L's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC.L is more volatile compared to 97GM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.L.Check 97GM.L's competition here