Spectra7 Microsystems Inc.
Spectra7 Microsystems Inc. SPVNF Peers
See (SPVNF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPVNF | $0.01 | -34.15% | 1.1M | -0.05 | -$0.10 | N/A |
| ASMLF | $744.33 | -0.38% | 292.7B | 29.93 | $24.87 | +0.94% |
| SLEGF | $188.10 | +300.00% | 72.3B | 376.19 | $0.50 | N/A |
| TOELY | $78.55 | -0.70% | 72B | 19.21 | $4.09 | +0.81% |
| IFNNF | $41.00 | +5.26% | 53.3B | 37.96 | $1.08 | +0.90% |
| IFNNY | $40.89 | +4.52% | 53.1B | 37.86 | $1.08 | +0.60% |
| RNECY | $6.32 | +1.61% | 45.4B | 19.75 | $0.32 | +0.88% |
| ATEYY | $51.87 | +0.02% | 38.1B | 34.81 | $1.49 | +0.35% |
| ADTTF | $47.90 | N/A | 35.1B | 32.15 | $1.49 | +0.55% |
| ASMIY | $560.00 | +0.89% | 27.5B | 50.27 | $11.14 | +0.60% |
Stock Comparison
SPVNF vs ASMLF Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, ASMLF has a market cap of 292.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while ASMLF trades at $744.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ASMLF's P/E ratio is 29.93. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to ASMLF's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to ASMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs SLEGF Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, SLEGF has a market cap of 72.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while SLEGF trades at $188.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SLEGF's P/E ratio is 376.19. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to SLEGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to SLEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs TOELY Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, TOELY has a market cap of 72B. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while TOELY trades at $78.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas TOELY's P/E ratio is 19.21. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to TOELY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to TOELY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs IFNNF Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, IFNNF has a market cap of 53.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while IFNNF trades at $41.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas IFNNF's P/E ratio is 37.96. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to IFNNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to IFNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs IFNNY Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, IFNNY has a market cap of 53.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while IFNNY trades at $40.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas IFNNY's P/E ratio is 37.86. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to IFNNY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to IFNNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs RNECY Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, RNECY has a market cap of 45.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while RNECY trades at $6.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas RNECY's P/E ratio is 19.75. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to RNECY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to RNECY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs ATEYY Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, ATEYY has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while ATEYY trades at $51.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ATEYY's P/E ratio is 34.81. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to ATEYY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to ATEYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs ADTTF Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, ADTTF has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while ADTTF trades at $47.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ADTTF's P/E ratio is 32.15. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to ADTTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to ADTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs ASMIY Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, ASMIY has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while ASMIY trades at $560.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ASMIY's P/E ratio is 50.27. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to ASMIY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to ASMIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs ASMXF Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, ASMXF has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while ASMXF trades at $551.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ASMXF's P/E ratio is 50.16. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to ASMXF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to ASMXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs STMEF Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, STMEF has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while STMEF trades at $28.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas STMEF's P/E ratio is 24.08. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to STMEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to STMEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs DSCSY Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, DSCSY has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while DSCSY trades at $22.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas DSCSY's P/E ratio is 29.17. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to DSCSY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to DSCSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs RNECF Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, RNECF has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while RNECF trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas RNECF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to RNECF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to RNECF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs DISPF Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, DISPF has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while DISPF trades at $181.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas DISPF's P/E ratio is 23.09. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to DISPF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to DISPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs HHUSF Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, HHUSF has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while HHUSF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas HHUSF's P/E ratio is 166.67. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to HHUSF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to HHUSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs BESVF Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, BESVF has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while BESVF trades at $123.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BESVF's P/E ratio is 48.93. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to BESVF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to BESVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs BESIY Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, BESIY has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while BESIY trades at $118.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BESIY's P/E ratio is 46.25. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to BESIY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to BESIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs LSRCY Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, LSRCY has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while LSRCY trades at $19.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas LSRCY's P/E ratio is 18.05. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to LSRCY's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to LSRCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs LSRCF Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, LSRCF has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while LSRCF trades at $88.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas LSRCF's P/E ratio is 16.35. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to LSRCF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to LSRCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs DINRF Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, DINRF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while DINRF trades at $63.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas DINRF's P/E ratio is 12.67. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to DINRF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to DINRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs ROHCY Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, ROHCY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while ROHCY trades at $11.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ROHCY's P/E ratio is -12.60. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to ROHCY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to ROHCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs ASMVF Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, ASMVF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while ASMVF trades at $9.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ASMVF's P/E ratio is 84.28. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to ASMVF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to ASMVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs ROHCF Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, ROHCF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while ROHCF trades at $9.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ROHCF's P/E ratio is -10.01. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to ROHCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to ROHCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs NDCVF Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, NDCVF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while NDCVF trades at $13.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas NDCVF's P/E ratio is -220.33. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to NDCVF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to NDCVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs SUMCF Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, SUMCF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while SUMCF trades at $6.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SUMCF's P/E ratio is 19.08. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to SUMCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to SUMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs MLXSF Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, MLXSF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while MLXSF trades at $59.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MLXSF's P/E ratio is 14.71. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to MLXSF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to MLXSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs SUOPY Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, SUOPY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while SUOPY trades at $13.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SUOPY's P/E ratio is 18.59. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to SUOPY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to SUOPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs NRSDY Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, NRSDY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while NRSDY trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas NRSDY's P/E ratio is -192.50. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to NRSDY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to NRSDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs SLOIF Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, SLOIF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while SLOIF trades at $60.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SLOIF's P/E ratio is 20.92. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to SLOIF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to SLOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs AMSSY Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, AMSSY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while AMSSY trades at $4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas AMSSY's P/E ratio is -5.34. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to AMSSY's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to AMSSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs SLOIY Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, SLOIY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while SLOIY trades at $24.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SLOIY's P/E ratio is 16.82. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to SLOIY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to SLOIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs AIXXF Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, AIXXF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while AIXXF trades at $13.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas AIXXF's P/E ratio is 13.99. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to AIXXF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to AIXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs AWEVF Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, AWEVF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while AWEVF trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas AWEVF's P/E ratio is -32.75. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to AWEVF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to AWEVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs OXINF Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, OXINF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while OXINF trades at $24.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas OXINF's P/E ratio is 20.44. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to OXINF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to OXINF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs AIIXY Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, AIIXY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while AIIXY trades at $25.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas AIIXY's P/E ratio is 12.75. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to AIIXY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to AIIXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs SSLLF Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, SSLLF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while SSLLF trades at $46.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SSLLF's P/E ratio is 31.13. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to SSLLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to SSLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs FUJXF Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, FUJXF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while FUJXF trades at $14.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas FUJXF's P/E ratio is 16.55. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to FUJXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to FUJXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs SANJF Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, SANJF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while SANJF trades at $42.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SANJF's P/E ratio is 3.84. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to SANJF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to SANJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs ASMVY Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, ASMVY has a market cap of 964.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while ASMVY trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ASMVY's P/E ratio is 65.16. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to ASMVY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to ASMVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs AUKUF Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, AUKUF has a market cap of 890.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while AUKUF trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas AUKUF's P/E ratio is -5.03. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to AUKUF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to AUKUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs SESMF Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, SESMF has a market cap of 865M. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while SESMF trades at $45.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SESMF's P/E ratio is 13.47. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to SESMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to SESMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs XFABF Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, XFABF has a market cap of 816.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while XFABF trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas XFABF's P/E ratio is 13.30. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to XFABF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to XFABF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs PVLYL Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, PVLYL has a market cap of 691.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while PVLYL trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas PVLYL's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to PVLYL's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to PVLYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs SILXF Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, SILXF has a market cap of 562.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while SILXF trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SILXF's P/E ratio is -29.54. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to SILXF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to SILXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs SILXY Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, SILXY has a market cap of 524.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while SILXY trades at $11.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SILXY's P/E ratio is -26.21. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to SILXY's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to SILXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs MITNF Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, MITNF has a market cap of 507.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while MITNF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MITNF's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to MITNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to MITNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs SFDMY Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, SFDMY has a market cap of 409.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while SFDMY trades at $43.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SFDMY's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to SFDMY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to SFDMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs THPTF Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, THPTF has a market cap of 363.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while THPTF trades at $19.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas THPTF's P/E ratio is 31.85. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to THPTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to THPTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs BRCHF Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, BRCHF has a market cap of 292.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while BRCHF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BRCHF's P/E ratio is -14.50. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to BRCHF's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to BRCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs WBTNF Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, WBTNF has a market cap of 228.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while WBTNF trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas WBTNF's P/E ratio is -8.46. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to WBTNF's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to WBTNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs QNCCF Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, QNCCF has a market cap of 208.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while QNCCF trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas QNCCF's P/E ratio is -36.33. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to QNCCF's ROE of -2.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to QNCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs NLST Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, NLST has a market cap of 196.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while NLST trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas NLST's P/E ratio is -4.21. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to NLST's ROE of +6.56%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to NLST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs MCRNF Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, MCRNF has a market cap of 166.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while MCRNF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MCRNF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to MCRNF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to MCRNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs IQEPY Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, IQEPY has a market cap of 139.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while IQEPY trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas IQEPY's P/E ratio is -5.07. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to IQEPY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to IQEPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs IQEPF Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, IQEPF has a market cap of 139.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while IQEPF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas IQEPF's P/E ratio is -2.87. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to IQEPF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to IQEPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs RNWEF Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, RNWEF has a market cap of 117.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while RNWEF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas RNWEF's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to RNWEF's ROE of +4.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to RNWEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs FRDSF Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, FRDSF has a market cap of 107.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while FRDSF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas FRDSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to FRDSF's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to FRDSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs PAGDF Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, PAGDF has a market cap of 67.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while PAGDF trades at $33.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas PAGDF's P/E ratio is -56.40. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to PAGDF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to PAGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs BUGLF Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, BUGLF has a market cap of 62.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while BUGLF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BUGLF's P/E ratio is -3.10. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to BUGLF's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to BUGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs ARRXF Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, ARRXF has a market cap of 57.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while ARRXF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ARRXF's P/E ratio is -11.25. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to ARRXF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to ARRXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs MYBUF Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, MYBUF has a market cap of 48.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while MYBUF trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MYBUF's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to MYBUF's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is less volatile compared to MYBUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs PRKR Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, PRKR has a market cap of 46M. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while PRKR trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas PRKR's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to PRKR's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to PRKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs RNWEY Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, RNWEY has a market cap of 42.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while RNWEY trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas RNWEY's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to RNWEY's ROE of +4.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to RNWEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs OBDCF Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, OBDCF has a market cap of 34.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while OBDCF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas OBDCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to OBDCF's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to OBDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs SODI Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, SODI has a market cap of 31.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while SODI trades at $15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SODI's P/E ratio is 39.10. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to SODI's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to SODI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs NNOCF Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, NNOCF has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while NNOCF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas NNOCF's P/E ratio is -7.59. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to NNOCF's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to NNOCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs CYBL Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, CYBL has a market cap of 28.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while CYBL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CYBL's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to CYBL's ROE of -23.71%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to CYBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs NXTBF Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, NXTBF has a market cap of 26.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while NXTBF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas NXTBF's P/E ratio is -11.59. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to NXTBF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to NXTBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs MMTIF Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, MMTIF has a market cap of 25.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while MMTIF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MMTIF's P/E ratio is -4.35. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to MMTIF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to MMTIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs SCIA Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, SCIA has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while SCIA trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SCIA's P/E ratio is 12.29. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to SCIA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to SCIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs WSKEF Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, WSKEF has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while WSKEF trades at $2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas WSKEF's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to WSKEF's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is less volatile compared to WSKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs GUER Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, GUER has a market cap of 12.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while GUER trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas GUER's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to GUER's ROE of -3.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to GUER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs BCHPY Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, BCHPY has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while BCHPY trades at $6.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BCHPY's P/E ratio is -12.22. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to BCHPY's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to BCHPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs PSFT Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, PSFT has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while PSFT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas PSFT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to PSFT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to PSFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs RBCN Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, RBCN has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while RBCN trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas RBCN's P/E ratio is -8.54. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to RBCN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to RBCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs MTNX Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, MTNX has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while MTNX trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MTNX's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to MTNX's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is less volatile compared to MTNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs ITCJ Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, ITCJ has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while ITCJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ITCJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to ITCJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is less volatile compared to ITCJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs MANZF Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, MANZF has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while MANZF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MANZF's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to MANZF's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to MANZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs NMGC Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, NMGC has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while NMGC trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas NMGC's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to NMGC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to NMGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs STRI Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, STRI has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while STRI trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas STRI's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to STRI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to STRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs ODII Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, ODII has a market cap of 292K. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while ODII trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ODII's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to ODII's ROE of +1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to ODII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs CXCQ Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, CXCQ has a market cap of 255K. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while CXCQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CXCQ's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to CXCQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is less volatile compared to CXCQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs STRB Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, STRB has a market cap of 122.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while STRB trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas STRB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to STRB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is less volatile compared to STRB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs GSTX Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, GSTX has a market cap of 113.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while GSTX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas GSTX's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to GSTX's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to GSTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs HSCO Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, HSCO has a market cap of 400. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while HSCO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas HSCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to HSCO's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is less volatile compared to HSCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs SRII Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, SRII has a market cap of 350. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while SRII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SRII's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to SRII's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to SRII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.
SPVNF vs TXCCQ Comparison
SPVNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPVNF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, TXCCQ has a market cap of 47. Regarding current trading prices, SPVNF is priced at $0.01, while TXCCQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas TXCCQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPVNF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to TXCCQ's ROE of -2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, SPVNF is more volatile compared to TXCCQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPVNF.