iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF
iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF SPMV.L Peers
See (SPMV.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPMV.L | £102.20 | +0.10% | 1.3B | 23.86 | £4.28 | N/A |
| UC65.L | £59.12 | +0.26% | 5.1T | N/A | N/A | +1.69% |
| UB02.L | £4,371.00 | +0.80% | 3.8T | N/A | N/A | +1.82% |
| IUSA.L | £4,421.50 | +0.44% | 1.3T | N/A | N/A | +1.07% |
| SSAC.L | £7,013.50 | +0.39% | 1.1T | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| EQGB.L | £41,465.00 | -0.61% | 979.2B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SMEA.L | £7,358.00 | +0.34% | 845.8B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| XESX.L | £4,809.00 | +0.33% | 790B | N/A | N/A | +2.72% |
| XESC.L | £7,921.50 | +0.36% | 790B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| MEUD.L | £22,272.50 | +0.24% | 770B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SPMV.L vs UC65.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, UC65.L has a market cap of 5.1T. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while UC65.L trades at £59.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas UC65.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UC65.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is more volatile compared to UC65.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs UB02.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, UB02.L has a market cap of 3.8T. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while UB02.L trades at £4,371.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas UB02.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UB02.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is more volatile compared to UB02.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs IUSA.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IUSA.L has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while IUSA.L trades at £4,421.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas IUSA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is less volatile compared to IUSA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs SSAC.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SSAC.L has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while SSAC.L trades at £7,013.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas SSAC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SSAC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is less volatile compared to SSAC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs EQGB.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, EQGB.L has a market cap of 979.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while EQGB.L trades at £41,465.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas EQGB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EQGB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is less volatile compared to EQGB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs SMEA.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SMEA.L has a market cap of 845.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while SMEA.L trades at £7,358.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas SMEA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMEA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is more volatile compared to SMEA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs XESX.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, XESX.L has a market cap of 790B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while XESX.L trades at £4,809.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas XESX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XESX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is more volatile compared to XESX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs XESC.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, XESC.L has a market cap of 790B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while XESC.L trades at £7,921.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas XESC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XESC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is more volatile compared to XESC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs MEUD.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MEUD.L has a market cap of 770B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while MEUD.L trades at £22,272.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas MEUD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MEUD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is more volatile compared to MEUD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs IITU.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IITU.L has a market cap of 747.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while IITU.L trades at £2,532.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas IITU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IITU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is less volatile compared to IITU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs JPSR.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, JPSR.L has a market cap of 694.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while JPSR.L trades at £1,965.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas JPSR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JPSR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is more volatile compared to JPSR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs UB0D.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, UB0D.L has a market cap of 692.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while UB0D.L trades at £2,164.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas UB0D.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UB0D.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is less volatile compared to UB0D.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs JT13.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, JT13.L has a market cap of 668.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while JT13.L trades at £592.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas JT13.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JT13.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is more volatile compared to JT13.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs CNAL.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CNAL.L has a market cap of 629.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while CNAL.L trades at £11,149.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas CNAL.L's P/E ratio is -10.42. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNAL.L's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is more volatile compared to CNAL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs IWRD.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IWRD.L has a market cap of 548B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while IWRD.L trades at £6,188.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas IWRD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWRD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is less volatile compared to IWRD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs XDAX.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, XDAX.L has a market cap of 541.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while XDAX.L trades at £19,204.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas XDAX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDAX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is more volatile compared to XDAX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs PHGP.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PHGP.L has a market cap of 501B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while PHGP.L trades at £22,941.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas PHGP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHGP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is less volatile compared to PHGP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs GLDA.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GLDA.L has a market cap of 488.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while GLDA.L trades at £9,768.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas GLDA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLDA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is less volatile compared to GLDA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs XMMS.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, XMMS.L has a market cap of 484.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while XMMS.L trades at £4,663.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas XMMS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XMMS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is more volatile compared to XMMS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs MXWS.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MXWS.L has a market cap of 462.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while MXWS.L trades at £9,079.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas MXWS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MXWS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is less volatile compared to MXWS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs XMUS.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, XMUS.L has a market cap of 438.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while XMUS.L trades at £13,189.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas XMUS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XMUS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is less volatile compared to XMUS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs UC44.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, UC44.L has a market cap of 422.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while UC44.L trades at £12,708.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas UC44.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UC44.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is more volatile compared to UC44.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs XMEU.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, XMEU.L has a market cap of 422.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while XMEU.L trades at £8,400.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas XMEU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XMEU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is more volatile compared to XMEU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs CS51.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CS51.L has a market cap of 416.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while CS51.L trades at £17,333.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas CS51.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CS51.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is more volatile compared to CS51.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs EUE.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, EUE.L has a market cap of 373.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while EUE.L trades at £4,698.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas EUE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUE.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is more volatile compared to EUE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs IEEM.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IEEM.L has a market cap of 365.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while IEEM.L trades at £3,428.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas IEEM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEEM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is more volatile compared to IEEM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs UB32.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, UB32.L has a market cap of 350.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while UB32.L trades at £8,719.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas UB32.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UB32.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is more volatile compared to UB32.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs CACX.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CACX.L has a market cap of 340.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while CACX.L trades at £6,618.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas CACX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CACX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is more volatile compared to CACX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs XSX6.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, XSX6.L has a market cap of 306.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while XSX6.L trades at £11,800.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas XSX6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XSX6.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is more volatile compared to XSX6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs SEMA.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SEMA.L has a market cap of 302.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while SEMA.L trades at £3,220.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas SEMA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEMA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is more volatile compared to SEMA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs GBSS.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GBSS.L has a market cap of 297.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while GBSS.L trades at £22,590.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas GBSS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBSS.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is less volatile compared to GBSS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs IWFQ.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IWFQ.L has a market cap of 293.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while IWFQ.L trades at £5,326.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas IWFQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWFQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is less volatile compared to IWFQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs SGBX.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SGBX.L has a market cap of 272.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while SGBX.L trades at £23,585.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas SGBX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGBX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is less volatile compared to SGBX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs IWFV.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IWFV.L has a market cap of 270.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while IWFV.L trades at £3,610.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas IWFV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWFV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is less volatile compared to IWFV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs ISPY.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ISPY.L has a market cap of 251.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while ISPY.L trades at £2,355.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas ISPY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ISPY.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is less volatile compared to ISPY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs CEA1.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CEA1.L has a market cap of 233.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while CEA1.L trades at £14,636.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas CEA1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CEA1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is more volatile compared to CEA1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs RBTX.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RBTX.L has a market cap of 222.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while RBTX.L trades at £1,069.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas RBTX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RBTX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is less volatile compared to RBTX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs JRDE.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, JRDE.L has a market cap of 222.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while JRDE.L trades at £3,691.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas JRDE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JRDE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is more volatile compared to JRDE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs JERE.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, JERE.L has a market cap of 222.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while JERE.L trades at £3,930.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas JERE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JERE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is more volatile compared to JERE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs CPJ1.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CPJ1.L has a market cap of 222.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while CPJ1.L trades at £15,171.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas CPJ1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CPJ1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is more volatile compared to CPJ1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs SUES.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SUES.L has a market cap of 217.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while SUES.L trades at £596.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas SUES.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SUES.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is more volatile compared to SUES.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs PHSP.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PHSP.L has a market cap of 207.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while PHSP.L trades at £2,435.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas PHSP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHSP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is less volatile compared to PHSP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs IUQF.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IUQF.L has a market cap of 201.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while IUQF.L trades at £1,111.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas IUQF.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUQF.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is less volatile compared to IUQF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs HMEF.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HMEF.L has a market cap of 197.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while HMEF.L trades at £872.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas HMEF.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HMEF.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is more volatile compared to HMEF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs IWFM.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IWFM.L has a market cap of 194.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while IWFM.L trades at £6,562.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas IWFM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWFM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is more volatile compared to IWFM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs XDEV.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, XDEV.L has a market cap of 182.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while XDEV.L trades at £3,714.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas XDEV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDEV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is less volatile compared to XDEV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs SOYU.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SOYU.L has a market cap of 178B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while SOYU.L trades at £306.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas SOYU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOYU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is more volatile compared to SOYU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs CEUR.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CEUR.L has a market cap of 171B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while CEUR.L trades at £31,135.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas CEUR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CEUR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is more volatile compared to CEUR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs UIFS.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, UIFS.L has a market cap of 168.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while UIFS.L trades at £1,102.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas UIFS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UIFS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is less volatile compared to UIFS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs XXSC.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, XXSC.L has a market cap of 164.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while XXSC.L trades at £5,484.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas XXSC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XXSC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is more volatile compared to XXSC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs SPGP.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SPGP.L has a market cap of 160.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while SPGP.L trades at £1,762.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas SPGP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPGP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is less volatile compared to SPGP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs XDEQ.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, XDEQ.L has a market cap of 158.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while XDEQ.L trades at £5,419.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas XDEQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDEQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is less volatile compared to XDEQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs GBSP.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GBSP.L has a market cap of 147.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while GBSP.L trades at £1,716.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas GBSP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBSP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is less volatile compared to GBSP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs PRIR.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PRIR.L has a market cap of 147.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while PRIR.L trades at £1,464.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas PRIR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRIR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is more volatile compared to PRIR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs IEFV.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IEFV.L has a market cap of 141.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while IEFV.L trades at £865.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas IEFV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEFV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is more volatile compared to IEFV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs CU1.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CU1.L has a market cap of 141.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while CU1.L trades at £45,592.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas CU1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CU1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is more volatile compared to CU1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs ISP6.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ISP6.L has a market cap of 139.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while ISP6.L trades at £6,451.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas ISP6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ISP6.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is less volatile compared to ISP6.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs WATL.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, WATL.L has a market cap of 135.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while WATL.L trades at £5,804.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas WATL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WATL.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is more volatile compared to WATL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs IPRP.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IPRP.L has a market cap of 135.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while IPRP.L trades at £2,687.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas IPRP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IPRP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is less volatile compared to IPRP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs XZEU.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, XZEU.L has a market cap of 132.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while XZEU.L trades at £2,835.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas XZEU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XZEU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is more volatile compared to XZEU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs GILS.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GILS.L has a market cap of 131.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while GILS.L trades at £10,116.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas GILS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GILS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is more volatile compared to GILS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs CUS1.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CUS1.L has a market cap of 129.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while CUS1.L trades at £38,052.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas CUS1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CUS1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is less volatile compared to CUS1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs XCX6.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, XCX6.L has a market cap of 128.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while XCX6.L trades at £1,315.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas XCX6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XCX6.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is more volatile compared to XCX6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs UC79.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, UC79.L has a market cap of 123B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while UC79.L trades at £1,110.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas UC79.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UC79.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is more volatile compared to UC79.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs 0GWB.IL Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0GWB.IL has a market cap of 120.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while 0GWB.IL trades at £492.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas 0GWB.IL's P/E ratio is 15.96. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0GWB.IL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is more volatile compared to 0GWB.IL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs INFL.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, INFL.L has a market cap of 120.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while INFL.L trades at £9,631.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas INFL.L's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INFL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is less volatile compared to INFL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs CG1.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CG1.L has a market cap of 119.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while CG1.L trades at £36,332.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas CG1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CG1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is more volatile compared to CG1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs SP5G.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SP5G.L has a market cap of 117.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while SP5G.L trades at £202.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas SP5G.L's P/E ratio is 63.22. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SP5G.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is more volatile compared to SP5G.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs CB5.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CB5.L has a market cap of 115.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while CB5.L trades at £3,897.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas CB5.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CB5.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is less volatile compared to CB5.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs CSPX.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CSPX.L has a market cap of 115B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while CSPX.L trades at £638.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas CSPX.L's P/E ratio is 26.35. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSPX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is less volatile compared to CSPX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs XRSG.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, XRSG.L has a market cap of 114.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while XRSG.L trades at £23,074.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas XRSG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XRSG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is less volatile compared to XRSG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs IGSG.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IGSG.L has a market cap of 110.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while IGSG.L trades at £5,892.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas IGSG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGSG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is more volatile compared to IGSG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs SPES.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SPES.L has a market cap of 108.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while SPES.L trades at £4,188.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas SPES.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPES.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is less volatile compared to SPES.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs H50E.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, H50E.L has a market cap of 108.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while H50E.L trades at £4,888.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas H50E.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to H50E.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is less volatile compared to H50E.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs IJPN.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IJPN.L has a market cap of 108B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while IJPN.L trades at £1,388.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas IJPN.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IJPN.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is more volatile compared to IJPN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs IEUX.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IEUX.L has a market cap of 107.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while IEUX.L trades at £4,100.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas IEUX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEUX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is more volatile compared to IEUX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs SPEX.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SPEX.L has a market cap of 107.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while SPEX.L trades at £4,423.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas SPEX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPEX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is less volatile compared to SPEX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs XDEM.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, XDEM.L has a market cap of 107.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while XDEM.L trades at £5,521.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas XDEM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDEM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is more volatile compared to XDEM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs JRDM.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, JRDM.L has a market cap of 107.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while JRDM.L trades at £2,323.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas JRDM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JRDM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is more volatile compared to JRDM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs PRIC.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PRIC.L has a market cap of 107B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while PRIC.L trades at £1,599.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas PRIC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRIC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is more volatile compared to PRIC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs RIEG.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RIEG.L has a market cap of 106.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while RIEG.L trades at £1,448.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas RIEG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RIEG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is more volatile compared to RIEG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs IWDA.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IWDA.L has a market cap of 104.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while IWDA.L trades at £114.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas IWDA.L's P/E ratio is 23.00. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWDA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is less volatile compared to IWDA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs DAXX.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DAXX.L has a market cap of 102.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while DAXX.L trades at £18,713.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas DAXX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DAXX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is more volatile compared to DAXX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs IMV.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IMV.L has a market cap of 101.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while IMV.L trades at £5,783.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas IMV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IMV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is more volatile compared to IMV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs CSCA.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CSCA.L has a market cap of 96.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while CSCA.L trades at £17,106.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas CSCA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSCA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is more volatile compared to CSCA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs TRXS.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TRXS.L has a market cap of 95.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while TRXS.L trades at £3,354.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas TRXS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TRXS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is less volatile compared to TRXS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs MTIX.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MTIX.L has a market cap of 93B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while MTIX.L trades at £14,034.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas MTIX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MTIX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is more volatile compared to MTIX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs PRIJ.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PRIJ.L has a market cap of 92.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while PRIJ.L trades at £2,396.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas PRIJ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRIJ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L and PRIJ.L have similar daily volatility (0.71).
SPMV.L vs IUKD.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IUKD.L has a market cap of 91.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while IUKD.L trades at £843.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas IUKD.L's P/E ratio is 15.12. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUKD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is more volatile compared to IUKD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs UB45.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, UB45.L has a market cap of 91.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while UB45.L trades at £6,121.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas UB45.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UB45.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is more volatile compared to UB45.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs XDN0.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, XDN0.L has a market cap of 90.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while XDN0.L trades at £4,270.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas XDN0.L's P/E ratio is 18.18. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDN0.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is more volatile compared to XDN0.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs WQDS.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, WQDS.L has a market cap of 89B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while WQDS.L trades at £547.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas WQDS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WQDS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is less volatile compared to WQDS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs EQDS.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, EQDS.L has a market cap of 88.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while EQDS.L trades at £546.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas EQDS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EQDS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is more volatile compared to EQDS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs COMM.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, COMM.L has a market cap of 87.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while COMM.L trades at £541.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas COMM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to COMM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is less volatile compared to COMM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs XLKQ.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, XLKQ.L has a market cap of 87.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while XLKQ.L trades at £51,995.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas XLKQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XLKQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is less volatile compared to XLKQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs CSP1.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CSP1.L has a market cap of 85B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while CSP1.L trades at £47,197.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas CSP1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSP1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is less volatile compared to CSP1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs CRPX.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CRPX.L has a market cap of 84.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while CRPX.L trades at £12,860.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas CRPX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CRPX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is more volatile compared to CRPX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs XDEB.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, XDEB.L has a market cap of 83.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while XDEB.L trades at £3,603.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas XDEB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDEB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is more volatile compared to XDEB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L vs IGUS.L Comparison
SPMV.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMV.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IGUS.L has a market cap of 83.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMV.L is priced at £102.20, while IGUS.L trades at £13,666.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMV.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.86, whereas IGUS.L's P/E ratio is 26.03. In terms of profitability, SPMV.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGUS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMV.L is less volatile compared to IGUS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMV.L.