Spearmint Resources Inc.
Spearmint Resources Inc. SPMTF Peers
See (SPMTF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPMTF | $0.01 | N/A | 2.96M | -1.03 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| BHPLF | $25.00 | +3.07% | 126.88B | 11.16 | $2.24 | +4.96% |
| RTNTF | $76.57 | -2.55% | 106.06B | 10.83 | $7.07 | +3.07% |
| RTPPF | $61.75 | +0.97% | 105.76B | 8.73 | $7.07 | +6.51% |
| GLCNF | $3.68 | +3.23% | 44.22B | -28.31 | -$0.13 | +3.10% |
| GLNCY | $7.26 | +1.83% | 44.10B | -27.92 | -$0.26 | +2.96% |
| GMBXF | $5.40 | -0.07% | 42.01B | 11.73 | $0.46 | +2.29% |
| NGLOY | $14.90 | +4.71% | 36.16B | -11.73 | -$1.27 | +2.14% |
| AAUKF | $29.61 | +6.86% | 35.93B | -11.70 | -$2.53 | +2.12% |
| FSUMF | $10.50 | -1.87% | 32.28B | 8.27 | $1.27 | +8.43% |
Stock Comparison
SPMTF vs BHPLF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, BHPLF has a market cap of 126.88B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while BHPLF trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas BHPLF's P/E ratio is 11.16. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BHPLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to BHPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs RTNTF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 106.06B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while RTNTF trades at $76.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF and RTNTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPMTF vs RTPPF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 105.76B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while RTPPF trades at $61.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 8.73. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF and RTPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPMTF vs GLCNF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 44.22B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while GLCNF trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is -28.31. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to GLCNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to GLCNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs GLNCY Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, GLNCY has a market cap of 44.10B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while GLNCY trades at $7.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas GLNCY's P/E ratio is -27.92. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to GLNCY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to GLNCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs GMBXF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 42.01B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while GMBXF trades at $5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 11.73. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs NGLOY Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 36.16B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while NGLOY trades at $14.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -11.73. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs AAUKF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 35.93B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while AAUKF trades at $29.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -11.70. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to AAUKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs FSUMF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, FSUMF has a market cap of 32.28B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while FSUMF trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas FSUMF's P/E ratio is 8.27. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to FSUMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to FSUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs FSUGY Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, FSUGY has a market cap of 30.88B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while FSUGY trades at $20.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas FSUGY's P/E ratio is 7.94. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to FSUGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to FSUGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs CMCLF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 20.18B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while CMCLF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to CMCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs TCKRF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 16.65B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while TCKRF trades at $33.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 676.80. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to TCKRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs IVPAF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 12.71B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while IVPAF trades at $9.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 29.37. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs BOLIF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.48B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF and BOLIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPMTF vs BDNNY Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 9.33B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while BDNNY trades at $65.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 7.87. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs JXMNF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, JXMNF has a market cap of 8.78B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while JXMNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas JXMNF's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to JXMNF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to JXMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs SHTLF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 8.76B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while SHTLF trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is -39.00. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to SHTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs IPOAF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, IPOAF has a market cap of 8.74B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while IPOAF trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas IPOAF's P/E ratio is 29.33. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to IPOAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to IPOAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs ABML Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.69B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while ABML trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs SMMYY Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 6.22B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while SMMYY trades at $5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 56.50. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs STMNF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 5.23B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while STMNF trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 46.34. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF and STMNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPMTF vs PUTKF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 5.08B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while PUTKF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF and PUTKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPMTF vs LYSDY Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 4.92B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while LYSDY trades at $5.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 131.50. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs LYSCF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 4.88B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while LYSCF trades at $5.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 130.50. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs PUTKY Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 4.83B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while PUTKY trades at $26.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 4.37. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs NILSY Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.62B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while NILSY trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF and NILSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPMTF vs PAEKY Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 4.23B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while PAEKY trades at $17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 19.15. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF and PAEKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPMTF vs MALRY Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 3.03B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while MALRY trades at $15.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is -3.84. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MALRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to MALRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs MALRF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 3.03B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while MALRF trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is -3.86. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MALRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to MALRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs FLMMF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 2.99B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs PILBF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 2.92B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while PILBF trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -90.60. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to PILBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs CHZQ Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, CHZQ has a market cap of 2.66B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while CHZQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas CHZQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CHZQ's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF and CHZQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPMTF vs NGXXF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 2.25B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while NGXXF trades at $10.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -38.89. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs PTNDY Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 2.22B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while PTNDY trades at $10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 29.19. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF and PTNDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPMTF vs MIMTF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 2.07B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while MIMTF trades at $15.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF and MIMTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPMTF vs PTNDF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 2.00B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while PTNDF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF and PTNDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPMTF vs AZZVF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 1.97B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF and AZZVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPMTF vs AFBOF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 1.81B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while AFBOF trades at $9.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 10.07. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to AFBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs DWMNF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 1.80B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while DWMNF trades at $30.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 9.65. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to DWMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs IIDDY Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 1.78B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while IIDDY trades at $4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to IIDDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to IIDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs NICMF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 1.78B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while NICMF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -10.25. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to NICMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs IPGDF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 1.78B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while IPGDF trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to IPGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to IPGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs SOUHY Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 1.76B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while SOUHY trades at $9.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is -37.42. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs ERMAF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.57B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while ERMAF trades at $54.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is 97.79. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ERMAF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to ERMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs ERMAY Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.56B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while ERMAY trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is 90.83. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ERMAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to ERMAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs DETRF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.29B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while DETRF trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 14.29. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to DETRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs ILKAY Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while ILKAY trades at $13.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is 7.91. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ILKAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF and ILKAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPMTF vs ADTLF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while ADTLF trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -14.26. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ADTLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to ADTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs AZRMF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF and AZRMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPMTF vs ADMLF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while ADMLF trades at $3.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -13.87. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ADMLF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs ILKAF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while ILKAF trades at $2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is 7.11. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ILKAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to ILKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs BQSSF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 1.05B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while BQSSF trades at $2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -63.00. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BQSSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs FMCXF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 946.92M. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while FMCXF trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -56.12. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs ATUSF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 922.62M. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while ATUSF trades at $19.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 12.94. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs STTSY Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 918.42M. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while STTSY trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to STTSY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to STTSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs LINRF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 899.86M. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while LINRF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -37.07. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF and LINRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPMTF vs AUSDF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 876.35M. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while AUSDF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 15.73. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to AUSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs AFMJF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 867.82M. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while AFMJF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs JMXXF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, JMXXF has a market cap of 862.86M. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while JMXXF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas JMXXF's P/E ratio is 44.00. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to JMXXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to JMXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs TAOFF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, TAOFF has a market cap of 705.35M. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while TAOFF trades at $2.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas TAOFF's P/E ratio is -22.10. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to TAOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to TAOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs AMVMF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, AMVMF has a market cap of 693.79M. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while AMVMF trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas AMVMF's P/E ratio is -56.58. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AMVMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to AMVMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs MFRVF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 604.58M. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while MFRVF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MFRVF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to MFRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs VULNF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 598.33M. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while VULNF trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -10.58. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF and VULNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPMTF vs CTJHF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, CTJHF has a market cap of 596.40M. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while CTJHF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas CTJHF's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CTJHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to CTJHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs MJDLF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 500.89M. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while MJDLF trades at $6.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 20.40. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to MJDLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs ALMTF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 499.37M. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while ALMTF trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -14.55. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs TTNNF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 492.10M. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while TTNNF trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to TTNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs OSTTF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 490.16M. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while OSTTF trades at $13.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to OSTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs MCRZF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.46M. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs BIRNF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 433.13M. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while BIRNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to BIRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs REEMF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, REEMF has a market cap of 401.55M. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while REEMF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas REEMF's P/E ratio is -25.93. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to REEMF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to REEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs MCHHF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 390.80M. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while MCHHF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 18.51. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF and MCHHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPMTF vs LLLAF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, LLLAF has a market cap of 389.26M. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while LLLAF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas LLLAF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to LLLAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to LLLAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs FGOVF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 388.50M. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while FGOVF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -73.45. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs NQMIY Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.42M. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF and NQMIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPMTF vs PXMFF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, PXMFF has a market cap of 379.33M. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while PXMFF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas PXMFF's P/E ratio is 3.28. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to PXMFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to PXMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs MNXMF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 359.66M. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while MNXMF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -62.61. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF and MNXMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPMTF vs CTJHY Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, CTJHY has a market cap of 351.63M. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while CTJHY trades at $8.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas CTJHY's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CTJHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF and CTJHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPMTF vs ERLFF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 342.21M. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while ERLFF trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -33.00. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to ERLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs KMRPF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, KMRPF has a market cap of 335.16M. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while KMRPF trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas KMRPF's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to KMRPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to KMRPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs MLYF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, MLYF has a market cap of 329.28M. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while MLYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas MLYF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MLYF's ROE of +5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to MLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs AUMTF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, AUMTF has a market cap of 313.13M. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while AUMTF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas AUMTF's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AUMTF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to AUMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs SLGGF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 300.11M. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while SLGGF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF and SLGGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPMTF vs MLXEF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 298.45M. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while MLXEF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to MLXEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs ARAFF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 295.72M. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while ARAFF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF and ARAFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPMTF vs LTSRF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, LTSRF has a market cap of 291.48M. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while LTSRF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas LTSRF's P/E ratio is -12.30. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to LTSRF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to LTSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs SVMLF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, SVMLF has a market cap of 278.18M. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while SVMLF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas SVMLF's P/E ratio is -14.33. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SVMLF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to SVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs FWEDF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 274.92M. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while FWEDF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -9.99. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs CGMLF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 268.43M. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while CGMLF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -17.25. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF and CGMLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPMTF vs LRSRF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, LRSRF has a market cap of 260.54M. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while LRSRF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas LRSRF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to LRSRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to LRSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs STQNF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, STQNF has a market cap of 251.56M. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while STQNF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas STQNF's P/E ratio is -17.20. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to STQNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF and STQNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPMTF vs PMETF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, PMETF has a market cap of 249.86M. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while PMETF trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas PMETF's P/E ratio is -53.00. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to PMETF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to PMETF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs ERDCF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, ERDCF has a market cap of 241.88M. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while ERDCF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas ERDCF's P/E ratio is -66.63. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ERDCF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to ERDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs SRHYY Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, SRHYY has a market cap of 239.72M. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while SRHYY trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas SRHYY's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SRHYY's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF and SRHYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPMTF vs RXRLF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, RXRLF has a market cap of 238.68M. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while RXRLF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas RXRLF's P/E ratio is -29.90. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to RXRLF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to RXRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs LTHHF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, LTHHF has a market cap of 238.10M. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while LTHHF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas LTHHF's P/E ratio is -16.02. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to LTHHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF and LTHHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPMTF vs BSRUF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, BSRUF has a market cap of 237.84M. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while BSRUF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas BSRUF's P/E ratio is -5.09. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BSRUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to BSRUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs PTTMF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, PTTMF has a market cap of 234.60M. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while PTTMF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas PTTMF's P/E ratio is 3.15. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to PTTMF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF is less volatile compared to PTTMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMTF.
SPMTF vs CILLF Comparison
SPMTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPMTF stands at 2.96M. In comparison, CILLF has a market cap of 232.44M. Regarding current trading prices, SPMTF is priced at $0.01, while CILLF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPMTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas CILLF's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, SPMTF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CILLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SPMTF and CILLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).