Spark New Zealand Limited
Spark New Zealand Limited SPKKY Peers
See (SPKKY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPKKY | $6.67 | +1.06% | 2.5B | 12.83 | $0.52 | +8.24% |
| AXTLF | $0.01 | -90.70% | 3.2T | -1.03 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| DTEGF | $38.14 | -1.40% | 186.9B | 13.72 | $2.78 | +3.00% |
| DTEGY | $37.96 | +0.77% | 186.8B | 13.65 | $2.78 | +2.98% |
| NTTYY | $27.82 | +3.11% | 92.1B | 13.18 | $2.11 | +1.17% |
| NPPXF | $1.11 | +1.84% | 91.4B | 12.28 | $0.09 | +3.22% |
| CUCSY | $13.06 | +8.29% | 88.9B | 7.42 | $1.76 | +5.79% |
| SFTBF | $52.81 | -0.49% | 75.9B | 9.67 | $5.46 | +0.57% |
| SFTBY | $26.10 | -1.08% | 74.6B | 9.56 | $2.73 | +0.19% |
| SFBQF | $1.56 | +1.28% | 74.2B | 19.50 | $0.08 | +3.78% |
Stock Comparison
SPKKY vs AXTLF Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AXTLF has a market cap of 3.2T. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while AXTLF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas AXTLF's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AXTLF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is less volatile compared to AXTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs DTEGF Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, DTEGF has a market cap of 186.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while DTEGF trades at $38.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas DTEGF's P/E ratio is 13.72. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DTEGF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to DTEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs DTEGY Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, DTEGY has a market cap of 186.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while DTEGY trades at $37.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas DTEGY's P/E ratio is 13.65. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DTEGY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to DTEGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs NTTYY Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, NTTYY has a market cap of 92.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while NTTYY trades at $27.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas NTTYY's P/E ratio is 13.18. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NTTYY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is less volatile compared to NTTYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs NPPXF Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, NPPXF has a market cap of 91.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while NPPXF trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas NPPXF's P/E ratio is 12.28. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NPPXF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to NPPXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs CUCSY Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CUCSY has a market cap of 88.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while CUCSY trades at $13.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas CUCSY's P/E ratio is 7.42. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CUCSY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is less volatile compared to CUCSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs SFTBF Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SFTBF has a market cap of 75.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while SFTBF trades at $52.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas SFTBF's P/E ratio is 9.67. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SFTBF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to SFTBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs SFTBY Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SFTBY has a market cap of 74.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while SFTBY trades at $26.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas SFTBY's P/E ratio is 9.56. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SFTBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is less volatile compared to SFTBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs SFBQF Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SFBQF has a market cap of 74.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while SFBQF trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas SFBQF's P/E ratio is 19.50. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SFBQF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to SFBQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs AMXVF Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AMXVF has a market cap of 73.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while AMXVF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas AMXVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AMXVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is less volatile compared to AMXVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs KDDIY Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, KDDIY has a market cap of 69.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while KDDIY trades at $17.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas KDDIY's P/E ratio is 14.52. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KDDIY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is less volatile compared to KDDIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs AMOVF Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AMOVF has a market cap of 66.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while AMOVF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas AMOVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AMOVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to AMOVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs KDDIF Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, KDDIF has a market cap of 58.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while KDDIF trades at $15.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas KDDIF's P/E ratio is 12.94. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KDDIF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to KDDIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs AARTY Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AARTY has a market cap of 55.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while AARTY trades at $15.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas AARTY's P/E ratio is 25.12. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AARTY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to AARTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs CLLNY Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CLLNY has a market cap of 54B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while CLLNY trades at $19.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas CLLNY's P/E ratio is -478.75. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CLLNY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to CLLNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs SGAPY Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SGAPY has a market cap of 49B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while SGAPY trades at $29.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas SGAPY's P/E ratio is 16.06. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SGAPY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to SGAPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs SNGNF Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SNGNF has a market cap of 47.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while SNGNF trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas SNGNF's P/E ratio is 15.21. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SNGNF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to SNGNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs FNCTF Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, FNCTF has a market cap of 39.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while FNCTF trades at $14.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas FNCTF's P/E ratio is 17.62. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FNCTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to FNCTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs SWZCF Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SWZCF has a market cap of 35.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while SWZCF trades at $693.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas SWZCF's P/E ratio is 20.45. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SWZCF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to SWZCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs SCMWY Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SCMWY has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while SCMWY trades at $68.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas SCMWY's P/E ratio is 20.26. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SCMWY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to SCMWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs TLGPY Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TLGPY has a market cap of 35.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while TLGPY trades at $15.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas TLGPY's P/E ratio is 32.77. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TLGPY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to TLGPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs TTRAF Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TTRAF has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while TTRAF trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas TTRAF's P/E ratio is 33.33. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TTRAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to TTRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs VODPF Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, VODPF has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while VODPF trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas VODPF's P/E ratio is -6.17. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VODPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to VODPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs AVIKF Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AVIKF has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while AVIKF trades at $7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas AVIKF's P/E ratio is 25.03. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AVIKF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to AVIKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs CTOWY Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CTOWY has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while CTOWY trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas CTOWY's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CTOWY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to CTOWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs TEFOF Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TEFOF has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while TEFOF trades at $4.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas TEFOF's P/E ratio is -45.60. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TEFOF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is less volatile compared to TEFOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs AVIFY Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AVIFY has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while AVIFY trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas AVIFY's P/E ratio is 22.63. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AVIFY's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to AVIFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs CHWRF Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CHWRF has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while CHWRF trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas CHWRF's P/E ratio is 16.44. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CHWRF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to CHWRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs BTGOF Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BTGOF has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while BTGOF trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas BTGOF's P/E ratio is 16.79. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BTGOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to BTGOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs TELNF Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TELNF has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while TELNF trades at $15.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas TELNF's P/E ratio is 23.46. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TELNF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to TELNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs TELNY Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TELNY has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while TELNY trades at $15.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas TELNY's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TELNY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to TELNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs KKPNY Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, KKPNY has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while KKPNY trades at $4.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas KKPNY's P/E ratio is 20.74. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KKPNY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to KKPNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs KKPNF Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, KKPNF has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while KKPNF trades at $4.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas KKPNF's P/E ratio is 20.28. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KKPNF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is less volatile compared to KKPNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs TLKMF Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TLKMF has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while TLKMF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas TLKMF's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TLKMF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to TLKMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs AVIVF Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AVIVF has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while AVIVF trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas AVIVF's P/E ratio is 18.34. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AVIVF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to AVIVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs ELMUY Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ELMUY has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while ELMUY trades at $25.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas ELMUY's P/E ratio is 19.88. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ELMUY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to ELMUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs HLTOY Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, HLTOY has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while HLTOY trades at $9.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas HLTOY's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HLTOY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to HLTOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs TLSNY Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TLSNY has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while TLSNY trades at $7.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas TLSNY's P/E ratio is 29.50. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TLSNY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to TLSNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs VDMCY Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, VDMCY has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while VDMCY trades at $7.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas VDMCY's P/E ratio is 16.43. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VDMCY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is less volatile compared to VDMCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs SJRWF Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SJRWF has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while SJRWF trades at $30.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas SJRWF's P/E ratio is 18.87. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SJRWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to SJRWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs RCIAF Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, RCIAF has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while RCIAF trades at $28.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas RCIAF's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RCIAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to RCIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs LBRDB Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, LBRDB has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while LBRDB trades at $100.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas LBRDB's P/E ratio is 16.01. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LBRDB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to LBRDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs VODAF Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, VODAF has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while VODAF trades at $7.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas VODAF's P/E ratio is 17.44. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VODAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is less volatile compared to VODAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs TLSNF Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TLSNF has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while TLSNF trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas TLSNF's P/E ratio is 25.38. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TLSNF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to TLSNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs MTNOF Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, MTNOF has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while MTNOF trades at $7.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas MTNOF's P/E ratio is -23.83. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MTNOF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to MTNOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs MTNOY Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, MTNOY has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while MTNOY trades at $6.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas MTNOY's P/E ratio is -23.22. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MTNOY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to MTNOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs HKTTY Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, HKTTY has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while HKTTY trades at $16.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas HKTTY's P/E ratio is 19.19. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HKTTY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to HKTTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs BCPPF Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BCPPF has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while BCPPF trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas BCPPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BCPPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is less volatile compared to BCPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs TELDY Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TELDY has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while TELDY trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas TELDY's P/E ratio is 7.81. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TELDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is less volatile compared to TELDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs BCEPF Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BCEPF has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while BCEPF trades at $12.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas BCEPF's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BCEPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to BCEPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs BECEF Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BECEF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while BECEF trades at $11.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas BECEF's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BECEF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to BECEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs TLTZY Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TLTZY has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while TLTZY trades at $7.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas TLTZY's P/E ratio is 25.55. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TLTZY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is less volatile compared to TLTZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs TIAIY Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TIAIY has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while TIAIY trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas TIAIY's P/E ratio is -25.42. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TIAIY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is less volatile compared to TIAIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs BCEXF Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BCEXF has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while BCEXF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas BCEXF's P/E ratio is 4.01. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BCEXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to BCEXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs TIAOF Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TIAOF has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while TIAOF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas TIAOF's P/E ratio is -21.10. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TIAOF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to TIAOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs DIGBF Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, DIGBF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while DIGBF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas DIGBF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DIGBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to DIGBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs TIAJF Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TIAJF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while TIAJF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas TIAJF's P/E ratio is -22.00. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TIAJF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to TIAJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs FRTAY Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, FRTAY has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while FRTAY trades at $17.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas FRTAY's P/E ratio is 12.32. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FRTAY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to FRTAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs ELMUF Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ELMUF has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while ELMUF trades at $49.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas ELMUF's P/E ratio is 19.42. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ELMUF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to ELMUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs SHNUF Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SHNUF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while SHNUF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas SHNUF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SHNUF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is less volatile compared to SHNUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs HKTTF Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, HKTTF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while HKTTF trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas HKTTF's P/E ratio is 10.64. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HKTTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to HKTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs SOBKY Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SOBKY has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while SOBKY trades at $15.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas SOBKY's P/E ratio is 20.42. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SOBKY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to SOBKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs TELDF Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TELDF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while TELDF trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas TELDF's P/E ratio is 19.75. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TELDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to TELDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs TLTZF Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TLTZF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while TLTZF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas TLTZF's P/E ratio is 17.24. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TLTZF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to TLTZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs QBCRF Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, QBCRF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while QBCRF trades at $28.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas QBCRF's P/E ratio is 11.77. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to QBCRF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to QBCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs MYTEF Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, MYTEF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while MYTEF trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas MYTEF's P/E ratio is 16.50. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MYTEF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to MYTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs HLTOF Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, HLTOF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while HLTOF trades at $15.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas HLTOF's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HLTOF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to HLTOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs QBCAF Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, QBCAF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while QBCAF trades at $26.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas QBCAF's P/E ratio is 11.05. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to QBCAF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to QBCAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs TCPFF Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TCPFF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while TCPFF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas TCPFF's P/E ratio is -16.25. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TCPFF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is less volatile compared to TCPFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs MAXSF Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, MAXSF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while MAXSF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas MAXSF's P/E ratio is 23.67. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MAXSF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to MAXSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs PCCWY Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PCCWY has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while PCCWY trades at $6.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas PCCWY's P/E ratio is -134.60. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PCCWY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to PCCWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs PCWLF Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PCWLF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while PCWLF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas PCWLF's P/E ratio is -66.59. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PCWLF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to PCWLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs TKAGY Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TKAGY has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while TKAGY trades at $15.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas TKAGY's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TKAGY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to TKAGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs PHTCF Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PHTCF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while PHTCF trades at $22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas PHTCF's P/E ratio is 8.62. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PHTCF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to PHTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs AAFRF Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AAFRF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while AAFRF trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas AAFRF's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AAFRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is less volatile compared to AAFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs TRKNY Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TRKNY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while TRKNY trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas TRKNY's P/E ratio is 18.13. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TRKNY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is less volatile compared to TRKNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs FRTAF Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, FRTAF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while FRTAF trades at $40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas FRTAF's P/E ratio is 14.04. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FRTAF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to FRTAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs GTMEY Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, GTMEY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while GTMEY trades at $32.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas GTMEY's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GTMEY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to GTMEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs BZQIF Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BZQIF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while BZQIF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas BZQIF's P/E ratio is 15.50. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BZQIF's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to BZQIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs TCMFF Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TCMFF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while TCMFF trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas TCMFF's P/E ratio is 99.50. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TCMFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to TCMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs BZQIY Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BZQIY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while BZQIY trades at $7.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas BZQIY's P/E ratio is 13.82. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BZQIY's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to BZQIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs AXXTF Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AXXTF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while AXXTF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas AXXTF's P/E ratio is 14.93. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AXXTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to AXXTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs PTITF Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PTITF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while PTITF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas PTITF's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PTITF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to PTITF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs CUCSF Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CUCSF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while CUCSF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas CUCSF's P/E ratio is 7.90. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CUCSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to CUCSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs TFAOF Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TFAOF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while TFAOF trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas TFAOF's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TFAOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to TFAOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs IIJIF Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, IIJIF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while IIJIF trades at $20.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas IIJIF's P/E ratio is 25.95. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IIJIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is less volatile compared to IIJIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs IIJIY Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, IIJIY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while IIJIY trades at $38.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas IIJIY's P/E ratio is 24.36. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IIJIY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to IIJIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs UDIRF Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, UDIRF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while UDIRF trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas UDIRF's P/E ratio is -55.71. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UDIRF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to UDIRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs MICCF Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, MICCF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while MICCF trades at $18.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas MICCF's P/E ratio is 70.96. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MICCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to MICCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs TACYY Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TACYY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while TACYY trades at $6.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas TACYY's P/E ratio is 32.18. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TACYY's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to TACYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs TRKNF Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TRKNF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while TRKNF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas TRKNF's P/E ratio is 39.93. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TRKNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to TRKNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs TLGHY Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TLGHY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while TLGHY trades at $11.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas TLGHY's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TLGHY's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to TLGHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs BGAOY Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BGAOY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while BGAOY trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas BGAOY's P/E ratio is 4.91. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BGAOY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to BGAOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs PTTWF Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PTTWF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while PTTWF trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas PTTWF's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PTTWF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is less volatile compared to PTTWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs GMOYF Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, GMOYF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while GMOYF trades at $25.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas GMOYF's P/E ratio is 28.69. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GMOYF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to GMOYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs BGAOF Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BGAOF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while BGAOF trades at $7.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas BGAOF's P/E ratio is 4.25. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BGAOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to BGAOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs CHRUF Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CHRUF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while CHRUF trades at $5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas CHRUF's P/E ratio is -540.00. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CHRUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is less volatile compared to CHRUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs SMNUF Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SMNUF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while SMNUF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas SMNUF's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SMNUF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to SMNUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.
SPKKY vs CHRYY Comparison
SPKKY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPKKY stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CHRYY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPKKY is priced at $6.67, while CHRYY trades at $23.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.83, whereas CHRYY's P/E ratio is -397.08. In terms of profitability, SPKKY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CHRYY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SPKKY is more volatile compared to CHRYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPKKY.