Spectrum Group International, Inc.
Spectrum Group International, Inc. SPGZ Peers
See (SPGZ) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPGZ | $21,500.00 | +27.22% | 62.4M | 15.75 | $1,365.25 | N/A |
| GLHD | $3.40 | +3399900.10% | 1.3T | 680.00 | $0.01 | N/A |
| BABAF | $14.63 | +4.35% | 280.2B | 15.73 | $0.93 | +1.39% |
| MPNGY | $36.24 | +4.95% | 111.6B | 23.08 | $1.57 | N/A |
| MPNGF | $17.25 | -0.66% | 105.4B | 22.12 | $0.78 | N/A |
| ANCTF | $53.55 | +1.25% | 50.8B | 19.69 | $2.72 | +0.99% |
| JDCMF | $17.25 | -1.43% | 44.6B | 8.41 | $2.05 | +2.90% |
| YAHOY | $7.28 | -0.21% | 26.2B | 25.09 | $0.29 | N/A |
| RKUNY | $5.61 | -1.15% | 12.1B | -9.04 | -$0.62 | N/A |
| RKUNF | $5.29 | -11.54% | 11.4B | -8.53 | -$0.62 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SPGZ vs GLHD Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, GLHD has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while GLHD trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas GLHD's P/E ratio is 680.00. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GLHD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and GLHD has daily volatility of 147.65.
SPGZ vs BABAF Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, BABAF has a market cap of 280.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while BABAF trades at $14.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas BABAF's P/E ratio is 15.73. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BABAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and BABAF has daily volatility of 1.72.
SPGZ vs MPNGY Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, MPNGY has a market cap of 111.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while MPNGY trades at $36.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas MPNGY's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MPNGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and MPNGY has daily volatility of 2.15.
SPGZ vs MPNGF Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, MPNGF has a market cap of 105.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while MPNGF trades at $17.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas MPNGF's P/E ratio is 22.12. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MPNGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and MPNGF has daily volatility of 1.09.
SPGZ vs ANCTF Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, ANCTF has a market cap of 50.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while ANCTF trades at $53.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas ANCTF's P/E ratio is 19.69. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ANCTF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and ANCTF has daily volatility of 0.86.
SPGZ vs JDCMF Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, JDCMF has a market cap of 44.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while JDCMF trades at $17.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas JDCMF's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JDCMF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and JDCMF has daily volatility of 0.00.
SPGZ vs YAHOY Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, YAHOY has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while YAHOY trades at $7.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas YAHOY's P/E ratio is 25.09. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to YAHOY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and YAHOY has daily volatility of 4.20.
SPGZ vs RKUNY Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, RKUNY has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while RKUNY trades at $5.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas RKUNY's P/E ratio is -9.04. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RKUNY's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and RKUNY has daily volatility of 0.71.
SPGZ vs RKUNF Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, RKUNF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while RKUNF trades at $5.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas RKUNF's P/E ratio is -8.53. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RKUNF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and RKUNF has daily volatility of 0.00.
SPGZ vs NCLTY Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, NCLTY has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while NCLTY trades at $9.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas NCLTY's P/E ratio is 21.21. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NCLTY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and NCLTY has daily volatility of 0.60.
SPGZ vs SNROF Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, SNROF has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while SNROF trades at $46.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas SNROF's P/E ratio is 39.91. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SNROF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and SNROF has daily volatility of 0.00.
SPGZ vs NCLTF Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, NCLTF has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while NCLTF trades at $97.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas NCLTF's P/E ratio is 20.74. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NCLTF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and NCLTF has daily volatility of 3.41.
SPGZ vs MONOY Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, MONOY has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while MONOY trades at $20.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas MONOY's P/E ratio is 52.41. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MONOY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and MONOY has daily volatility of 0.59.
SPGZ vs SRTTY Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, SRTTY has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while SRTTY trades at $10.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas SRTTY's P/E ratio is 31.30. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SRTTY's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and SRTTY has daily volatility of 8.32.
SPGZ vs SATLF Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, SATLF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while SATLF trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas SATLF's P/E ratio is 30.86. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SATLF's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and SATLF has daily volatility of 0.00.
SPGZ vs ZLNDY Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, ZLNDY has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while ZLNDY trades at $17.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas ZLNDY's P/E ratio is 30.28. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ZLNDY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and ZLNDY has daily volatility of 0.85.
SPGZ vs HKTGF Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, HKTGF has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while HKTGF trades at $207.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas HKTGF's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HKTGF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and HKTGF has daily volatility of 0.00.
SPGZ vs ZLDSF Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, ZLDSF has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while ZLDSF trades at $34.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas ZLDSF's P/E ratio is 29.91. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ZLDSF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and ZLDSF has daily volatility of 0.00.
SPGZ vs DLVHF Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, DLVHF has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while DLVHF trades at $28.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas DLVHF's P/E ratio is -3.06. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DLVHF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and DLVHF has daily volatility of 2.06.
SPGZ vs DFRYF Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, DFRYF has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while DFRYF trades at $55.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas DFRYF's P/E ratio is 67.33. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DFRYF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and DFRYF has daily volatility of 0.00.
SPGZ vs DELHY Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, DELHY has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while DELHY trades at $2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas DELHY's P/E ratio is -2.83. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DELHY's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and DELHY has daily volatility of 1.84.
SPGZ vs DUFRY Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, DUFRY has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while DUFRY trades at $5.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas DUFRY's P/E ratio is 67.63. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DUFRY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and DUFRY has daily volatility of 1.48.
SPGZ vs PETRY Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, PETRY has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while PETRY trades at $6.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas PETRY's P/E ratio is 3.46. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PETRY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and PETRY has daily volatility of 14.09.
SPGZ vs MTTRY Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, MTTRY has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while MTTRY trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas MTTRY's P/E ratio is -29.99. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MTTRY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and MTTRY has daily volatility of 0.00.
SPGZ vs CDNTF Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, CDNTF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while CDNTF trades at $183.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas CDNTF's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CDNTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and CDNTF has daily volatility of 0.00.
SPGZ vs CDNAF Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, CDNAF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while CDNAF trades at $128.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas CDNAF's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CDNAF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and CDNAF has daily volatility of 0.19.
SPGZ vs ELPQF Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, ELPQF has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while ELPQF trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas ELPQF's P/E ratio is 5.67. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ELPQF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and ELPQF has daily volatility of 1.02.
SPGZ vs ALEGF Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, ALEGF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while ALEGF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas ALEGF's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ALEGF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and ALEGF has daily volatility of 22.22.
SPGZ vs JDDSF Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, JDDSF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while JDDSF trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas JDDSF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JDDSF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and JDDSF has daily volatility of 18.60.
SPGZ vs MONOF Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, MONOF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while MONOF trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas MONOF's P/E ratio is 29.49. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MONOF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and MONOF has daily volatility of 2.66.
SPGZ vs JDSPY Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, JDSPY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while JDSPY trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas JDSPY's P/E ratio is 8.08. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JDSPY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and JDSPY has daily volatility of 4.65.
SPGZ vs SAXJY Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, SAXJY has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while SAXJY trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas SAXJY's P/E ratio is 12.75. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SAXJY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and SAXJY has daily volatility of 16.77.
SPGZ vs JTKWY Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, JTKWY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while JTKWY trades at $4.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas JTKWY's P/E ratio is -7.98. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JTKWY's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and JTKWY has daily volatility of 0.46.
SPGZ vs TKAYF Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, TKAYF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while TKAYF trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas TKAYF's P/E ratio is -8.06. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TKAYF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and TKAYF has daily volatility of 0.00.
SPGZ vs JUMSY Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, JUMSY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while JUMSY trades at $31.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas JUMSY's P/E ratio is 11.65. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JUMSY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and JUMSY has daily volatility of 1.28.
SPGZ vs HNORY Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, HNORY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while HNORY trades at $16.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas HNORY's P/E ratio is 15.18. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HNORY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and HNORY has daily volatility of 0.00.
SPGZ vs SDIPF Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, SDIPF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while SDIPF trades at $9.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas SDIPF's P/E ratio is 10.12. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SDIPF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and SDIPF has daily volatility of 18.40.
SPGZ vs ZLPSF Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, ZLPSF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while ZLPSF trades at $536.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas ZLPSF's P/E ratio is -623.70. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ZLPSF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and ZLPSF has daily volatility of 91.36.
SPGZ vs JUMSF Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, JUMSF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while JUMSF trades at $27.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas JUMSF's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JUMSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and JUMSF has daily volatility of 0.00.
SPGZ vs CNVAF Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, CNVAF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while CNVAF trades at $10.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas CNVAF's P/E ratio is -34.68. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CNVAF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and CNVAF has daily volatility of 200.00.
SPGZ vs ZOPLY Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, ZOPLY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while ZOPLY trades at $122.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas ZOPLY's P/E ratio is -210.38. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ZOPLY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and ZOPLY has daily volatility of 0.00.
SPGZ vs DROOF Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, DROOF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while DROOF trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas DROOF's P/E ratio is 59.35. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DROOF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and DROOF has daily volatility of 0.00.
SPGZ vs DNLMY Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, DNLMY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while DNLMY trades at $15.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas DNLMY's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DNLMY's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and DNLMY has daily volatility of 0.00.
SPGZ vs JBHIF Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, JBHIF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while JBHIF trades at $28.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas JBHIF's P/E ratio is 10.46. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JBHIF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and JBHIF has daily volatility of 34.43.
SPGZ vs MRCIF Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, MRCIF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while MRCIF trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas MRCIF's P/E ratio is 25.37. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MRCIF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and MRCIF has daily volatility of 0.00.
SPGZ vs MCARY Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, MCARY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while MCARY trades at $8.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas MCARY's P/E ratio is 24.50. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MCARY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and MCARY has daily volatility of 2.31.
SPGZ vs FHNGY Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, FHNGY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while FHNGY trades at $7.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas FHNGY's P/E ratio is 14.65. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FHNGY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and FHNGY has daily volatility of 0.00.
SPGZ vs YMDAF Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, YMDAF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while YMDAF trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas YMDAF's P/E ratio is 11.92. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to YMDAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and YMDAF has daily volatility of 7.01.
SPGZ vs GRUPF Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, GRUPF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while GRUPF trades at $66.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas GRUPF's P/E ratio is 15.90. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GRUPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and GRUPF has daily volatility of 0.00.
SPGZ vs DSITF Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, DSITF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while DSITF trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas DSITF's P/E ratio is 23.67. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DSITF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and DSITF has daily volatility of 0.00.
SPGZ vs PAHGF Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, PAHGF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while PAHGF trades at $3.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas PAHGF's P/E ratio is 15.52. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PAHGF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and PAHGF has daily volatility of 0.00.
SPGZ vs MIZUF Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, MIZUF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while MIZUF trades at $21.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas MIZUF's P/E ratio is 5.23. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MIZUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and MIZUF has daily volatility of 0.00.
SPGZ vs MTAGF Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, MTAGF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while MTAGF trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas MTAGF's P/E ratio is 19.41. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MTAGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and MTAGF has daily volatility of 0.60.
SPGZ vs BTOOY Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, BTOOY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while BTOOY trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas BTOOY's P/E ratio is -23.63. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BTOOY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and BTOOY has daily volatility of 0.00.
SPGZ vs WHTPF Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, WHTPF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while WHTPF trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas WHTPF's P/E ratio is 200.67. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WHTPF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and WHTPF has daily volatility of 0.00.
SPGZ vs GPGNF Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, GPGNF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while GPGNF trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas GPGNF's P/E ratio is 16.11. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GPGNF's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and GPGNF has daily volatility of 0.00.
SPGZ vs LEFUF Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, LEFUF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while LEFUF trades at $20.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas LEFUF's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LEFUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and LEFUF has daily volatility of 0.05.
SPGZ vs MGLUY Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, MGLUY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while MGLUY trades at $6.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas MGLUY's P/E ratio is 16.66. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MGLUY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and MGLUY has daily volatility of 0.00.
SPGZ vs MKRMF Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, MKRMF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while MKRMF trades at $235.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas MKRMF's P/E ratio is -136.63. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MKRMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and MKRMF has daily volatility of 0.00.
SPGZ vs SCCAF Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, SCCAF has a market cap of 875M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while SCCAF trades at $25.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas SCCAF's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SCCAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and SCCAF has daily volatility of 0.00.
SPGZ vs ACEHF Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, ACEHF has a market cap of 763.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while ACEHF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas ACEHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ACEHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and ACEHF has daily volatility of 0.00.
SPGZ vs FNXTF Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, FNXTF has a market cap of 750.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while FNXTF trades at $56.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas FNXTF's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FNXTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and FNXTF has daily volatility of 0.36.
SPGZ vs HWGC Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, HWGC has a market cap of 596.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while HWGC trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas HWGC's P/E ratio is 100.00. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HWGC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and HWGC has daily volatility of 0.00.
SPGZ vs THGHY Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, THGHY has a market cap of 591.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while THGHY trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas THGHY's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to THGHY's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and THGHY has daily volatility of 0.00.
SPGZ vs ASOMF Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, ASOMF has a market cap of 584M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while ASOMF trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas ASOMF's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ASOMF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and ASOMF has daily volatility of 0.00.
SPGZ vs THGPF Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, THGPF has a market cap of 535M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while THGPF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas THGPF's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to THGPF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and THGPF has daily volatility of 0.00.
SPGZ vs XXLLY Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, XXLLY has a market cap of 520.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while XXLLY trades at $7.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas XXLLY's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to XXLLY's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and XXLLY has daily volatility of 5.56.
SPGZ vs ASOMY Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, ASOMY has a market cap of 508.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while ASOMY trades at $4.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas ASOMY's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ASOMY's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and ASOMY has daily volatility of 0.00.
SPGZ vs HLFDY Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, HLFDY has a market cap of 470.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while HLFDY trades at $4.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas HLFDY's P/E ratio is 13.90. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HLFDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and HLFDY has daily volatility of 0.23.
SPGZ vs CRFCF Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, CRFCF has a market cap of 412.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while CRFCF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas CRFCF's P/E ratio is 6.56. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CRFCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and CRFCF has daily volatility of 0.00.
SPGZ vs KGGNF Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, KGGNF has a market cap of 397.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while KGGNF trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas KGGNF's P/E ratio is 100.00. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KGGNF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and KGGNF has daily volatility of 10.65.
SPGZ vs BHOOY Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, BHOOY has a market cap of 370.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while BHOOY trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas BHOOY's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BHOOY's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and BHOOY has daily volatility of 0.00.
SPGZ vs HLFDF Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, HLFDF has a market cap of 364.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while HLFDF trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas HLFDF's P/E ratio is 11.13. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HLFDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and HLFDF has daily volatility of 0.00.
SPGZ vs KTYCF Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, KTYCF has a market cap of 332.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while KTYCF trades at $10.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas KTYCF's P/E ratio is 104.00. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KTYCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and KTYCF has daily volatility of 5.13.
SPGZ vs BHHOF Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, BHHOF has a market cap of 302.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while BHHOF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas BHHOF's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BHHOF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and BHHOF has daily volatility of 0.00.
SPGZ vs SSILF Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, SSILF has a market cap of 265M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while SSILF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas SSILF's P/E ratio is 8.54. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SSILF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and SSILF has daily volatility of 0.00.
SPGZ vs NBRNF Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, NBRNF has a market cap of 251.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while NBRNF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas NBRNF's P/E ratio is 53.84. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NBRNF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and NBRNF has daily volatility of 0.61.
SPGZ vs HMAGF Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, HMAGF has a market cap of 246.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while HMAGF trades at $7.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas HMAGF's P/E ratio is -4.68. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HMAGF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and HMAGF has daily volatility of 0.00.
SPGZ vs YUMSF Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, YUMSF has a market cap of 187.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while YUMSF trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas YUMSF's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to YUMSF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and YUMSF has daily volatility of 4.88.
SPGZ vs BNNNF Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, BNNNF has a market cap of 173.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while BNNNF trades at $13.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas BNNNF's P/E ratio is 14.24. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BNNNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and BNNNF has daily volatility of 37.62.
SPGZ vs HKTVY Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, HKTVY has a market cap of 163.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while HKTVY trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas HKTVY's P/E ratio is -18.55. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HKTVY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and HKTVY has daily volatility of 0.00.
SPGZ vs WCRS Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, WCRS has a market cap of 129.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while WCRS trades at $14.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas WCRS's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WCRS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and WCRS has daily volatility of 16.79.
SPGZ vs RDBBY Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, RDBBY has a market cap of 129.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while RDBBY trades at $4.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas RDBBY's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RDBBY's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and RDBBY has daily volatility of 4.33.
SPGZ vs GMELF Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, GMELF has a market cap of 118.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while GMELF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas GMELF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GMELF's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and GMELF has daily volatility of 0.00.
SPGZ vs AHAHF Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, AHAHF has a market cap of 116.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while AHAHF trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas AHAHF's P/E ratio is -160.00. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AHAHF's ROE of +5.53%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and AHAHF has daily volatility of 196.81.
SPGZ vs IGDFF Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, IGDFF has a market cap of 78.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while IGDFF trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas IGDFF's P/E ratio is 5.07. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IGDFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and IGDFF has daily volatility of 0.00.
SPGZ vs MHCRF Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, MHCRF has a market cap of 64.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while MHCRF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas MHCRF's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MHCRF's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and MHCRF has daily volatility of 0.00.
SPGZ vs ADBGF Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, ADBGF has a market cap of 61.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while ADBGF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas ADBGF's P/E ratio is 65.00. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ADBGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and ADBGF has daily volatility of 0.00.
SPGZ vs ALLGF Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, ALLGF has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while ALLGF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas ALLGF's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ALLGF's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and ALLGF has daily volatility of 0.00.
SPGZ vs IDGBF Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, IDGBF has a market cap of 50.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while IDGBF trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas IDGBF's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IDGBF's ROE of -12.64%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and IDGBF has daily volatility of 0.00.
SPGZ vs PXHI Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, PXHI has a market cap of 49.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while PXHI trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas PXHI's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PXHI's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and PXHI has daily volatility of 0.00.
SPGZ vs TWRKF Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, TWRKF has a market cap of 40.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while TWRKF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas TWRKF's P/E ratio is 0.13. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TWRKF's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and TWRKF has daily volatility of 0.00.
SPGZ vs ARTZF Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, ARTZF has a market cap of 38.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while ARTZF trades at $6.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas ARTZF's P/E ratio is -44.53. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ARTZF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and ARTZF has daily volatility of 27.95.
SPGZ vs RDBBF Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, RDBBF has a market cap of 36.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while RDBBF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas RDBBF's P/E ratio is -3.25. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RDBBF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and RDBBF has daily volatility of 8.00.
SPGZ vs FDIT Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, FDIT has a market cap of 30.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while FDIT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas FDIT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FDIT's ROE of -4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and FDIT has daily volatility of 0.00.
SPGZ vs RLAB Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, RLAB has a market cap of 17.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while RLAB trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas RLAB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RLAB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and RLAB has daily volatility of 61.68.
SPGZ vs BWTL Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, BWTL has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while BWTL trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas BWTL's P/E ratio is -23.82. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BWTL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and BWTL has daily volatility of 0.00.
SPGZ vs AVDWF Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, AVDWF has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while AVDWF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas AVDWF's P/E ratio is 62.50. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AVDWF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and AVDWF has daily volatility of 47.52.
SPGZ vs WINH Comparison
SPGZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGZ stands at 62.4M. In comparison, WINH has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGZ is priced at $21,500.00, while WINH trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGZ currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas WINH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPGZ's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WINH's ROE of -2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A and WINH has daily volatility of 0.00.