Simon Property Group Acquisition Holdings, Inc.
Simon Property Group Acquisition Holdings, Inc. SPGSW Peers
See (SPGSW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Shell Companies Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPGSW | $0.00 | N/A | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| QMIS | $0.25 | N/A | 30.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| GSHN | $22.70 | +2.71% | 9.3B | -2270.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| KATX | $1.05 | N/A | 1.9B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| CCYC | $11.25 | N/A | 1.7B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ZSYC | $2.00 | -9.09% | 1B | -2.12 | -$0.95 | N/A |
| PBAJ | $5.00 | N/A | 1B | 14.29 | $0.35 | N/A |
| WCHS | $6.60 | +31.74% | 700.7M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| WPCBF | $0.00 | +100.00% | 700.3M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| NOTR | $13.00 | N/A | 570.9M | -433.33 | -$0.03 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SPGSW vs QMIS Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, QMIS has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while QMIS trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QMIS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to QMIS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW and QMIS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPGSW vs GSHN Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, GSHN has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while GSHN trades at $22.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSHN's P/E ratio is -2270.00. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GSHN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW and GSHN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPGSW vs KATX Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, KATX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while KATX trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KATX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KATX's ROE of +1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW is less volatile compared to KATX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPGSW.
SPGSW vs CCYC Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, CCYC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while CCYC trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCYC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CCYC's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW and CCYC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPGSW vs ZSYC Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, ZSYC has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while ZSYC trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZSYC's P/E ratio is -2.12. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ZSYC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW is less volatile compared to ZSYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPGSW.
SPGSW vs PBAJ Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, PBAJ has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while PBAJ trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PBAJ's P/E ratio is 14.29. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PBAJ's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW and PBAJ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPGSW vs WCHS Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, WCHS has a market cap of 700.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while WCHS trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WCHS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WCHS's ROE of +0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW and WCHS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPGSW vs WPCBF Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, WPCBF has a market cap of 700.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while WPCBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WPCBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WPCBF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW and WPCBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPGSW vs NOTR Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, NOTR has a market cap of 570.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while NOTR trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOTR's P/E ratio is -433.33. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NOTR's ROE of -65.90%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW is less volatile compared to NOTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPGSW.
SPGSW vs DVTC Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, DVTC has a market cap of 490.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while DVTC trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DVTC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DVTC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW is less volatile compared to DVTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPGSW.
SPGSW vs FZRO Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, FZRO has a market cap of 346.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while FZRO trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FZRO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FZRO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW and FZRO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPGSW vs RGLG Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, RGLG has a market cap of 342.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while RGLG trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGLG's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RGLG's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW is less volatile compared to RGLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPGSW.
SPGSW vs CINV Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, CINV has a market cap of 338.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while CINV trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CINV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CINV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW and CINV have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPGSW vs AMRR Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, AMRR has a market cap of 250.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while AMRR trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMRR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AMRR's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW and AMRR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPGSW vs BTOW Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, BTOW has a market cap of 192.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while BTOW trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTOW's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BTOW's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW and BTOW have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPGSW vs KAST Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, KAST has a market cap of 164.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while KAST trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KAST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KAST's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW is less volatile compared to KAST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPGSW.
SPGSW vs SCGX Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, SCGX has a market cap of 146.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while SCGX trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCGX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SCGX's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW and SCGX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPGSW vs RMGCF Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, RMGCF has a market cap of 125.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while RMGCF trades at $9.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RMGCF's P/E ratio is -20.04. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RMGCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW and RMGCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPGSW vs AOAO Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, AOAO has a market cap of 118.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while AOAO trades at $10.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AOAO's P/E ratio is -11.07. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AOAO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW and AOAO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPGSW vs TGLO Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, TGLO has a market cap of 110.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while TGLO trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TGLO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TGLO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW is less volatile compared to TGLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPGSW.
SPGSW vs TRFE Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, TRFE has a market cap of 101M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while TRFE trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRFE's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TRFE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW and TRFE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPGSW vs NMTT Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, NMTT has a market cap of 90.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while NMTT trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NMTT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NMTT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW and NMTT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPGSW vs ATAQF Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, ATAQF has a market cap of 82.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while ATAQF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATAQF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ATAQF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW is less volatile compared to ATAQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPGSW.
SPGSW vs WWHC Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, WWHC has a market cap of 80.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while WWHC trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WWHC's P/E ratio is -2.11. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WWHC's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW and WWHC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPGSW vs CHAAW Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, CHAAW has a market cap of 77.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while CHAAW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHAAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CHAAW's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW and CHAAW have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPGSW vs CMCAF Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, CMCAF has a market cap of 76.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while CMCAF trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMCAF's P/E ratio is 60.00. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CMCAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW and CMCAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPGSW vs XITO Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, XITO has a market cap of 76M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while XITO trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XITO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to XITO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW is less volatile compared to XITO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPGSW.
SPGSW vs CREEF Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, CREEF has a market cap of 75M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while CREEF trades at $10.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CREEF's P/E ratio is 36.47. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CREEF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW is less volatile compared to CREEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPGSW.
SPGSW vs WAYS Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, WAYS has a market cap of 69.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while WAYS trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WAYS's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WAYS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW is less volatile compared to WAYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPGSW.
SPGSW vs CAHO Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, CAHO has a market cap of 66.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while CAHO trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAHO's P/E ratio is -179.00. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CAHO's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW and CAHO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPGSW vs ACBD Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, ACBD has a market cap of 60M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while ACBD trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACBD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ACBD's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW is less volatile compared to ACBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPGSW.
SPGSW vs SSHT Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, SSHT has a market cap of 58.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while SSHT trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSHT's P/E ratio is -17.66. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SSHT's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW and SSHT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPGSW vs PTCP Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, PTCP has a market cap of 56.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while PTCP trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTCP's P/E ratio is -27.78. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PTCP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW and PTCP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPGSW vs AASP Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, AASP has a market cap of 56.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while AASP trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AASP's P/E ratio is -19.83. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AASP's ROE of -2.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW is less volatile compared to AASP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPGSW.
SPGSW vs ATMS Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, ATMS has a market cap of 55.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while ATMS trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATMS's P/E ratio is -8.30. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ATMS's ROE of +1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW and ATMS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPGSW vs MDWK Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, MDWK has a market cap of 50.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while MDWK trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDWK's P/E ratio is -22.90. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MDWK's ROE of -1.94%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW is less volatile compared to MDWK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPGSW.
SPGSW vs AVNI Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, AVNI has a market cap of 48.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while AVNI trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVNI's P/E ratio is -45.00. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AVNI's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW and AVNI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPGSW vs JMTM Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, JMTM has a market cap of 48M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while JMTM trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JMTM's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JMTM's ROE of +4.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW is less volatile compared to JMTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPGSW.
SPGSW vs KWACW Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, KWACW has a market cap of 46.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while KWACW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KWACW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KWACW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW and KWACW have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPGSW vs KWAC Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, KWAC has a market cap of 46.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while KWAC trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KWAC's P/E ratio is -23.75. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KWAC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW and KWAC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPGSW vs FDHC Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, FDHC has a market cap of 37.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while FDHC trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FDHC's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FDHC's ROE of -2.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW is less volatile compared to FDHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPGSW.
SPGSW vs WBQNL Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, WBQNL has a market cap of 37.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while WBQNL trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WBQNL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WBQNL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW and WBQNL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPGSW vs AWCA Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, AWCA has a market cap of 36.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while AWCA trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AWCA's P/E ratio is -9.47. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AWCA's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW is less volatile compared to AWCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPGSW.
SPGSW vs GWIN Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, GWIN has a market cap of 36.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while GWIN trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GWIN's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GWIN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW and GWIN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPGSW vs CNXX Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, CNXX has a market cap of 34.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while CNXX trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNXX's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CNXX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW and CNXX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPGSW vs XTPT Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, XTPT has a market cap of 31.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while XTPT trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XTPT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to XTPT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW is less volatile compared to XTPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPGSW.
SPGSW vs CNWHF Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, CNWHF has a market cap of 31.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while CNWHF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNWHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CNWHF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW is less volatile compared to CNWHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPGSW.
SPGSW vs OOGI Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, OOGI has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while OOGI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OOGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OOGI's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW is less volatile compared to OOGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPGSW.
SPGSW vs IDIG Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, IDIG has a market cap of 26.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while IDIG trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IDIG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW and IDIG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPGSW vs XCPT Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, XCPT has a market cap of 25M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while XCPT trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XCPT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to XCPT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW is less volatile compared to XCPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPGSW.
SPGSW vs NPFC Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, NPFC has a market cap of 23.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while NPFC trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPFC's P/E ratio is -17.86. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NPFC's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW and NPFC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPGSW vs CBBB Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, CBBB has a market cap of 22.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while CBBB trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBBB's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CBBB's ROE of +10.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW is less volatile compared to CBBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPGSW.
SPGSW vs ADCV Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, ADCV has a market cap of 22M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while ADCV trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADCV's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ADCV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW and ADCV have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPGSW vs EVTK Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, EVTK has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while EVTK trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVTK's P/E ratio is -510.00. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EVTK's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW is less volatile compared to EVTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPGSW.
SPGSW vs AGSS Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, AGSS has a market cap of 19.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while AGSS trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGSS's P/E ratio is -6.97. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AGSS's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW and AGSS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPGSW vs FWFW Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, FWFW has a market cap of 18M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while FWFW trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FWFW's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FWFW's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW and FWFW have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPGSW vs WRPT Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, WRPT has a market cap of 15.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while WRPT trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRPT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WRPT's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW and WRPT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPGSW vs GTVI Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, GTVI has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while GTVI trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTVI's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GTVI's ROE of +1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW and GTVI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPGSW vs BOREF Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, BOREF has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while BOREF trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOREF's P/E ratio is -33.33. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BOREF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW and BOREF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPGSW vs UGHB Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, UGHB has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while UGHB trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UGHB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UGHB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW is less volatile compared to UGHB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPGSW.
SPGSW vs STLY Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, STLY has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while STLY trades at $6.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STLY's P/E ratio is -33.44. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STLY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW and STLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPGSW vs ELLH Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, ELLH has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while ELLH trades at $18.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELLH's P/E ratio is -5.45. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ELLH's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW and ELLH have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPGSW vs ECGR Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, ECGR has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while ECGR trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECGR's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ECGR's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW is less volatile compared to ECGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPGSW.
SPGSW vs USBL Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, USBL has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while USBL trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USBL's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to USBL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW is less volatile compared to USBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPGSW.
SPGSW vs ITRX Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, ITRX has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while ITRX trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITRX's P/E ratio is -3.81. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ITRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW and ITRX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPGSW vs TCRI Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, TCRI has a market cap of 11.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while TCRI trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCRI's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TCRI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW and TCRI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPGSW vs PSCO Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, PSCO has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while PSCO trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSCO's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PSCO's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW is less volatile compared to PSCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPGSW.
SPGSW vs NIHL Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, NIHL has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while NIHL trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NIHL's P/E ratio is -2.03. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NIHL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW is less volatile compared to NIHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPGSW.
SPGSW vs AZRH Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, AZRH has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while AZRH trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AZRH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AZRH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW is less volatile compared to AZRH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPGSW.
SPGSW vs BDCM Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, BDCM has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while BDCM trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BDCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BDCM's ROE of +20.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW and BDCM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPGSW vs SLTN Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, SLTN has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while SLTN trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLTN's P/E ratio is -31.33. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SLTN's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW and SLTN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPGSW vs PCMC Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, PCMC has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while PCMC trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCMC's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PCMC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW is less volatile compared to PCMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPGSW.
SPGSW vs LWLW Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, LWLW has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while LWLW trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LWLW's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LWLW's ROE of -5.84%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW and LWLW have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPGSW vs FUNR Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, FUNR has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while FUNR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUNR's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FUNR's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW is less volatile compared to FUNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPGSW.
SPGSW vs GIPL Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, GIPL has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while GIPL trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIPL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GIPL's ROE of +3391.68%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW is less volatile compared to GIPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPGSW.
SPGSW vs ADIA Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, ADIA has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while ADIA trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADIA's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ADIA's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW is less volatile compared to ADIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPGSW.
SPGSW vs GFOO Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, GFOO has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while GFOO trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GFOO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GFOO's ROE of +42.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW is less volatile compared to GFOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPGSW.
SPGSW vs NGRC Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, NGRC has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while NGRC trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NGRC's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NGRC's ROE of +1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW and NGRC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPGSW vs CAVG Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, CAVG has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while CAVG trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAVG's P/E ratio is -4.27. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CAVG's ROE of +1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW is less volatile compared to CAVG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPGSW.
SPGSW vs SITS Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, SITS has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while SITS trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SITS's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SITS's ROE of -3.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW and SITS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPGSW vs LRGR Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, LRGR has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while LRGR trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LRGR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LRGR's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW is less volatile compared to LRGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPGSW.
SPGSW vs NRCD Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, NRCD has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while NRCD trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NRCD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NRCD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW and NRCD have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPGSW vs ASNB Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, ASNB has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while ASNB trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASNB's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ASNB's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW is less volatile compared to ASNB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPGSW.
SPGSW vs FSTJ Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, FSTJ has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while FSTJ trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSTJ's P/E ratio is -60.00. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FSTJ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW and FSTJ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPGSW vs PVRS Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, PVRS has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while PVRS trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PVRS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PVRS's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW is less volatile compared to PVRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPGSW.
SPGSW vs ARAT Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, ARAT has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while ARAT trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARAT's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ARAT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW and ARAT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPGSW vs MTRI Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, MTRI has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while MTRI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTRI's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MTRI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW is less volatile compared to MTRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPGSW.
SPGSW vs WNFT Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, WNFT has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while WNFT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WNFT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WNFT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW is less volatile compared to WNFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPGSW.
SPGSW vs SMPP Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, SMPP has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while SMPP trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMPP's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SMPP's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW is less volatile compared to SMPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPGSW.
SPGSW vs HKBT Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, HKBT has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while HKBT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKBT's P/E ratio is 0.23. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HKBT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW is less volatile compared to HKBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPGSW.
SPGSW vs XSVT Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, XSVT has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while XSVT trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XSVT's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to XSVT's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW and XSVT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPGSW vs AVVH Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, AVVH has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while AVVH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVVH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AVVH's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW is less volatile compared to AVVH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPGSW.
SPGSW vs GDVM Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, GDVM has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while GDVM trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDVM's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GDVM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW is less volatile compared to GDVM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPGSW.
SPGSW vs ENGA Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, ENGA has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while ENGA trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENGA's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ENGA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW and ENGA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPGSW vs CRVH Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, CRVH has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while CRVH trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRVH's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CRVH's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW and CRVH have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPGSW vs HBIE Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, HBIE has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while HBIE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HBIE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HBIE's ROE of -7.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW and HBIE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPGSW vs SMEV Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, SMEV has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while SMEV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMEV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SMEV's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW is less volatile compared to SMEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPGSW.
SPGSW vs ATMH Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, ATMH has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while ATMH trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATMH's P/E ratio is -7.40. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ATMH's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW and ATMH have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SPGSW vs IWSH Comparison
SPGSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPGSW stands at 0. In comparison, IWSH has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SPGSW is priced at $0.00, while IWSH trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPGSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWSH's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, SPGSW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IWSH's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SPGSW and IWSH have similar daily volatility (0.00).