Spacefy Inc.
Spacefy Inc. (SPFYF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SPFYF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Internet Content & Information Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPFYF | $0.01 | -13.22% | 571.8K | 1.05 | $0.01 | N/A |
| TCEHY | $70.20 | +3.46% | 640.6B | 24.69 | $2.85 | +0.86% |
| TCTZF | $70.42 | +5.39% | 639.6B | 24.62 | $2.86 | +0.85% |
| PROSY | $11.48 | +2.07% | 131.7B | 11.15 | $1.03 | +0.20% |
| PROSF | $60.00 | +2.32% | 131.2B | 11.63 | $5.16 | +0.19% |
| NPSNY | $62.13 | +3.09% | 50.9B | 10.34 | $6.02 | +0.23% |
| NAPRF | $275.00 | -12.46% | 44.6B | 9.14 | $30.10 | +0.21% |
| KUASF | $9.50 | +0.00% | 41.1B | 19.79 | $0.48 | N/A |
| KSHTY | $1.80 | +0.00% | 40.9B | 18.00 | $0.10 | N/A |
| BAIDF | $10.86 | -1.27% | 30.5B | 8.55 | $1.27 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SPFYF vs TCEHY Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, TCEHY has a market cap of 640.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while TCEHY trades at $70.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas TCEHY's P/E ratio is 24.69. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TCEHY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF is less volatile compared to TCEHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPFYF.Check TCEHY's competition here
SPFYF vs TCTZF Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, TCTZF has a market cap of 639.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while TCTZF trades at $70.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas TCTZF's P/E ratio is 24.62. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TCTZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF is less volatile compared to TCTZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPFYF.Check TCTZF's competition here
SPFYF vs PROSY Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, PROSY has a market cap of 131.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while PROSY trades at $11.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas PROSY's P/E ratio is 11.15. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PROSY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF is less volatile compared to PROSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPFYF.Check PROSY's competition here
SPFYF vs PROSF Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, PROSF has a market cap of 131.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while PROSF trades at $60.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas PROSF's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PROSF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF and PROSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PROSF's competition here
SPFYF vs NPSNY Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, NPSNY has a market cap of 50.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while NPSNY trades at $62.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas NPSNY's P/E ratio is 10.34. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NPSNY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF is less volatile compared to NPSNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPFYF.Check NPSNY's competition here
SPFYF vs NAPRF Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, NAPRF has a market cap of 44.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while NAPRF trades at $275.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas NAPRF's P/E ratio is 9.14. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NAPRF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF and NAPRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NAPRF's competition here
SPFYF vs KUASF Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, KUASF has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while KUASF trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas KUASF's P/E ratio is 19.79. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KUASF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF is less volatile compared to KUASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPFYF.Check KUASF's competition here
SPFYF vs KSHTY Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, KSHTY has a market cap of 40.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while KSHTY trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas KSHTY's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KSHTY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF is less volatile compared to KSHTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPFYF.Check KSHTY's competition here
SPFYF vs BAIDF Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, BAIDF has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while BAIDF trades at $10.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas BAIDF's P/E ratio is 8.55. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAIDF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF and BAIDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BAIDF's competition here
SPFYF vs YAHOF Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, YAHOF has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while YAHOF trades at $3.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas YAHOF's P/E ratio is 26.65. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to YAHOF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF and YAHOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YAHOF's competition here
SPFYF vs RPGRY Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, RPGRY has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while RPGRY trades at $40.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas RPGRY's P/E ratio is 54.37. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RPGRY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF is less volatile compared to RPGRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPFYF.Check RPGRY's competition here
SPFYF vs RPGRF Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, RPGRF has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while RPGRF trades at $161.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas RPGRF's P/E ratio is 53.79. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RPGRF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF and RPGRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RPGRF's competition here
SPFYF vs NHNCF Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, NHNCF has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while NHNCF trades at $115.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas NHNCF's P/E ratio is 23.37. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NHNCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF is less volatile compared to NHNCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPFYF.Check NHNCF's competition here
SPFYF vs ADEVF Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, ADEVF has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while ADEVF trades at $11.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas ADEVF's P/E ratio is -80.57. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ADEVF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF and ADEVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ADEVF's competition here
SPFYF vs ADEVY Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, ADEVY has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while ADEVY trades at $4.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas ADEVY's P/E ratio is -66.57. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ADEVY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF and ADEVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ADEVY's competition here
SPFYF vs ATDRF Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, ATDRF has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while ATDRF trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas ATDRF's P/E ratio is 27.03. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ATDRF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF is less volatile compared to ATDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPFYF.Check ATDRF's competition here
SPFYF vs ATDRY Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, ATDRY has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while ATDRY trades at $2.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas ATDRY's P/E ratio is 27.30. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ATDRY's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF is less volatile compared to ATDRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPFYF.Check ATDRY's competition here
SPFYF vs CSXXY Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, CSXXY has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while CSXXY trades at $48.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas CSXXY's P/E ratio is 54.84. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CSXXY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF is less volatile compared to CSXXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPFYF.Check CSXXY's competition here
SPFYF vs RTMVY Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, RTMVY has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while RTMVY trades at $21.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas RTMVY's P/E ratio is 31.56. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RTMVY's ROE of +2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF is less volatile compared to RTMVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPFYF.Check RTMVY's competition here
SPFYF vs RTMVF Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, RTMVF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while RTMVF trades at $8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas RTMVF's P/E ratio is 26.97. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RTMVF's ROE of +2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF and RTMVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RTMVF's competition here
SPFYF vs SKLTF Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, SKLTF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while SKLTF trades at $13.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas SKLTF's P/E ratio is 166.50. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SKLTF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF is less volatile compared to SKLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPFYF.Check SKLTF's competition here
SPFYF vs KKKUF Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, KKKUF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while KKKUF trades at $17.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas KKKUF's P/E ratio is 25.37. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KKKUF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF and KKKUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KKKUF's competition here
SPFYF vs CHLLF Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, CHLLF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while CHLLF trades at $2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas CHLLF's P/E ratio is -99.00. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CHLLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF and CHLLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHLLF's competition here
SPFYF vs HMNTY Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, HMNTY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while HMNTY trades at $29.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas HMNTY's P/E ratio is 48.43. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HMNTY's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF and HMNTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HMNTY's competition here
SPFYF vs OOOOF Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, OOOOF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while OOOOF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas OOOOF's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OOOOF's ROE of +12.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF is less volatile compared to OOOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPFYF.Check OOOOF's competition here
SPFYF vs DHGAF Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, DHGAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while DHGAF trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas DHGAF's P/E ratio is 50.80. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DHGAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF is less volatile compared to DHGAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPFYF.Check DHGAF's competition here
SPFYF vs MEIUF Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, MEIUF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while MEIUF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas MEIUF's P/E ratio is 11.58. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MEIUF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF is less volatile compared to MEIUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPFYF.Check MEIUF's competition here
SPFYF vs WNWSF Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, WNWSF has a market cap of 668.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while WNWSF trades at $30.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas WNWSF's P/E ratio is 44.37. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WNWSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF and WNWSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WNWSF's competition here
SPFYF vs MLRYY Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, MLRYY has a market cap of 524M. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while MLRYY trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas MLRYY's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MLRYY's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF and MLRYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MLRYY's competition here
SPFYF vs XINXF Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, XINXF has a market cap of 431.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while XINXF trades at $76.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas XINXF's P/E ratio is 30.48. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to XINXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF and XINXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XINXF's competition here
SPFYF vs ZGXNF Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, ZGXNF has a market cap of 427.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while ZGXNF trades at $4.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas ZGXNF's P/E ratio is 16.65. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZGXNF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF is less volatile compared to ZGXNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPFYF.Check ZGXNF's competition here
SPFYF vs ADBMF Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, ADBMF has a market cap of 371.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while ADBMF trades at $22.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas ADBMF's P/E ratio is 56.74. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ADBMF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF and ADBMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ADBMF's competition here
SPFYF vs FRRGF Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, FRRGF has a market cap of 239.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while FRRGF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas FRRGF's P/E ratio is -27.50. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FRRGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF and FRRGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FRRGF's competition here
SPFYF vs VYGPF Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, VYGPF has a market cap of 232M. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while VYGPF trades at $9.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas VYGPF's P/E ratio is 458.50. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VYGPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF is less volatile compared to VYGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPFYF.Check VYGPF's competition here
SPFYF vs MECVF Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, MECVF has a market cap of 186.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while MECVF trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas MECVF's P/E ratio is -17.71. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MECVF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF and MECVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MECVF's competition here
SPFYF vs NXCLF Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, NXCLF has a market cap of 160.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while NXCLF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas NXCLF's P/E ratio is -2.72. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NXCLF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF and NXCLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NXCLF's competition here
SPFYF vs UUMMF Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, UUMMF has a market cap of 152.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while UUMMF trades at $7.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas UUMMF's P/E ratio is 40.52. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UUMMF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF and UUMMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UUMMF's competition here
SPFYF vs HYPPF Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, HYPPF has a market cap of 132.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while HYPPF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas HYPPF's P/E ratio is 6.47. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HYPPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF is less volatile compared to HYPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPFYF.Check HYPPF's competition here
SPFYF vs OPNDF Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, OPNDF has a market cap of 121M. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while OPNDF trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas OPNDF's P/E ratio is -130.00. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OPNDF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF and OPNDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OPNDF's competition here
SPFYF vs ZMDTF Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, ZMDTF has a market cap of 102.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while ZMDTF trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas ZMDTF's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZMDTF's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF is less volatile compared to ZMDTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPFYF.Check ZMDTF's competition here
SPFYF vs RSTN Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, RSTN has a market cap of 84.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while RSTN trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas RSTN's P/E ratio is -10.16. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RSTN's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF is less volatile compared to RSTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPFYF.Check RSTN's competition here
SPFYF vs CKPDY Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, CKPDY has a market cap of 84.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while CKPDY trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas CKPDY's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CKPDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF is less volatile compared to CKPDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPFYF.Check CKPDY's competition here
SPFYF vs CPADF Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, CPADF has a market cap of 80.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while CPADF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas CPADF's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CPADF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF is less volatile compared to CPADF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPFYF.Check CPADF's competition here
SPFYF vs MSEZ Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, MSEZ has a market cap of 55.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while MSEZ trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas MSEZ's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MSEZ's ROE of +9.87%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF and MSEZ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MSEZ's competition here
SPFYF vs TGRVF Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, TGRVF has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while TGRVF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas TGRVF's P/E ratio is 4.73. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TGRVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF is less volatile compared to TGRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPFYF.Check TGRVF's competition here
SPFYF vs PXSTF Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, PXSTF has a market cap of 49.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while PXSTF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas PXSTF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PXSTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF is less volatile compared to PXSTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPFYF.Check PXSTF's competition here
SPFYF vs BBUZ Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, BBUZ has a market cap of 34.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while BBUZ trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas BBUZ's P/E ratio is -4.85. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BBUZ's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF is less volatile compared to BBUZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPFYF.Check BBUZ's competition here
SPFYF vs RDLYF Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, RDLYF has a market cap of 30.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while RDLYF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas RDLYF's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RDLYF's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF and RDLYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RDLYF's competition here
SPFYF vs SABOF Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, SABOF has a market cap of 19.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while SABOF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas SABOF's P/E ratio is -39.00. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SABOF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF and SABOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SABOF's competition here
SPFYF vs PRSNF Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, PRSNF has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while PRSNF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas PRSNF's P/E ratio is -4.04. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PRSNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF is less volatile compared to PRSNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPFYF.Check PRSNF's competition here
SPFYF vs NIROF Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, NIROF has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while NIROF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas NIROF's P/E ratio is -1.55. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NIROF's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF and NIROF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NIROF's competition here
SPFYF vs EGLXF Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, EGLXF has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while EGLXF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas EGLXF's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EGLXF's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF is less volatile compared to EGLXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPFYF.Check EGLXF's competition here
SPFYF vs BMTM Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, BMTM has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while BMTM trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas BMTM's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BMTM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF is less volatile compared to BMTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPFYF.Check BMTM's competition here
SPFYF vs GIFX Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, GIFX has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while GIFX trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas GIFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GIFX's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF is less volatile compared to GIFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPFYF.Check GIFX's competition here
SPFYF vs BBTVF Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, BBTVF has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while BBTVF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas BBTVF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BBTVF's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF is less volatile compared to BBTVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPFYF.Check BBTVF's competition here
SPFYF vs SFUNY Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, SFUNY has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while SFUNY trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas SFUNY's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SFUNY's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF and SFUNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SFUNY's competition here
SPFYF vs NUGL Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, NUGL has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while NUGL trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas NUGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NUGL's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF is less volatile compared to NUGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPFYF.Check NUGL's competition here
SPFYF vs CRTDW Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, CRTDW has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while CRTDW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas CRTDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CRTDW's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF and CRTDW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CRTDW's competition here
SPFYF vs YOOIF Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, YOOIF has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while YOOIF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas YOOIF's P/E ratio is 4.50. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to YOOIF's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF and YOOIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YOOIF's competition here
SPFYF vs FMHS Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, FMHS has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while FMHS trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas FMHS's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FMHS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF is less volatile compared to FMHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPFYF.Check FMHS's competition here
SPFYF vs LBUY Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, LBUY has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while LBUY trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas LBUY's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LBUY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF is less volatile compared to LBUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPFYF.Check LBUY's competition here
SPFYF vs MRPT Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, MRPT has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while MRPT trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas MRPT's P/E ratio is -8.40. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MRPT's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF is less volatile compared to MRPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPFYF.Check MRPT's competition here
SPFYF vs SEEK Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, SEEK has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while SEEK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas SEEK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SEEK's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF is less volatile compared to SEEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPFYF.Check SEEK's competition here
SPFYF vs QQQFF Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, QQQFF has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while QQQFF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas QQQFF's P/E ratio is -2.11. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to QQQFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF and QQQFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QQQFF's competition here
SPFYF vs GOGY Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, GOGY has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while GOGY trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas GOGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GOGY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF is less volatile compared to GOGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPFYF.Check GOGY's competition here
SPFYF vs LTCP Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, LTCP has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while LTCP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas LTCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LTCP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF and LTCP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LTCP's competition here
SPFYF vs APMLF Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, APMLF has a market cap of 928K. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while APMLF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas APMLF's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to APMLF's ROE of +36.79%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF and APMLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check APMLF's competition here
SPFYF vs MRNJ Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, MRNJ has a market cap of 762.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while MRNJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas MRNJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MRNJ's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF is less volatile compared to MRNJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPFYF.Check MRNJ's competition here
SPFYF vs YITD Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, YITD has a market cap of 608.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while YITD trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas YITD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to YITD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF is less volatile compared to YITD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPFYF.Check YITD's competition here
SPFYF vs CYAP Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, CYAP has a market cap of 598.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while CYAP trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas CYAP's P/E ratio is -5.87. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CYAP's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF and CYAP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CYAP's competition here
SPFYF vs ILIM Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, ILIM has a market cap of 513.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while ILIM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas ILIM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ILIM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF is less volatile compared to ILIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPFYF.Check ILIM's competition here
SPFYF vs VMSI Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, VMSI has a market cap of 506.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while VMSI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas VMSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VMSI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF and VMSI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VMSI's competition here
SPFYF vs RBDC Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, RBDC has a market cap of 505.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while RBDC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas RBDC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RBDC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF is less volatile compared to RBDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPFYF.Check RBDC's competition here
SPFYF vs LKST Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, LKST has a market cap of 247.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while LKST trades at $4.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas LKST's P/E ratio is -7.47. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LKST's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF is less volatile compared to LKST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPFYF.Check LKST's competition here
SPFYF vs DGTHF Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, DGTHF has a market cap of 217.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while DGTHF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas DGTHF's P/E ratio is 0.08. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DGTHF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF and DGTHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DGTHF's competition here
SPFYF vs ZONX Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, ZONX has a market cap of 151K. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while ZONX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas ZONX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZONX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF and ZONX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZONX's competition here
SPFYF vs RAIO Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, RAIO has a market cap of 140.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while RAIO trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas RAIO's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RAIO's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF is less volatile compared to RAIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPFYF.Check RAIO's competition here
SPFYF vs KIWB Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, KIWB has a market cap of 137.7K. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while KIWB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas KIWB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KIWB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF is less volatile compared to KIWB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPFYF.Check KIWB's competition here
SPFYF vs QTTOY Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, QTTOY has a market cap of 78.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while QTTOY trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas QTTOY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to QTTOY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF and QTTOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QTTOY's competition here
SPFYF vs OTTV Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, OTTV has a market cap of 47.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while OTTV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas OTTV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OTTV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF and OTTV have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OTTV's competition here
SPFYF vs LHGI Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, LHGI has a market cap of 41.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while LHGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas LHGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LHGI's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF and LHGI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LHGI's competition here
SPFYF vs SLNM Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, SLNM has a market cap of 31.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while SLNM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas SLNM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SLNM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF is less volatile compared to SLNM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPFYF.Check SLNM's competition here
SPFYF vs HUTN Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, HUTN has a market cap of 26.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while HUTN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas HUTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HUTN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF and HUTN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HUTN's competition here
SPFYF vs ABBY Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, ABBY has a market cap of 12K. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while ABBY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas ABBY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ABBY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF is less volatile compared to ABBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPFYF.Check ABBY's competition here
SPFYF vs REDFY Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, REDFY has a market cap of 10.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while REDFY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas REDFY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to REDFY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF and REDFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check REDFY's competition here
SPFYF vs RWRDP Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, RWRDP has a market cap of 10K. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while RWRDP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas RWRDP's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RWRDP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF and RWRDP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RWRDP's competition here
SPFYF vs DELCF Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, DELCF has a market cap of 8.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while DELCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas DELCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DELCF's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF and DELCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DELCF's competition here
SPFYF vs FRFR Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, FRFR has a market cap of 8.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while FRFR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas FRFR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FRFR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF is less volatile compared to FRFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPFYF.Check FRFR's competition here
SPFYF vs BTIM Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, BTIM has a market cap of 6K. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while BTIM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas BTIM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BTIM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF and BTIM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BTIM's competition here
SPFYF vs PIKL Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, PIKL has a market cap of 5.7K. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while PIKL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas PIKL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PIKL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF and PIKL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PIKL's competition here
SPFYF vs ISHM Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, ISHM has a market cap of 5.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while ISHM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas ISHM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ISHM's ROE of -9.54%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF and ISHM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ISHM's competition here
SPFYF vs SHGY Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, SHGY has a market cap of 5K. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while SHGY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas SHGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SHGY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF and SHGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHGY's competition here
SPFYF vs MDAW Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, MDAW has a market cap of 5K. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while MDAW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas MDAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MDAW's ROE of +7.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF and MDAW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MDAW's competition here
SPFYF vs LOCM Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, LOCM has a market cap of 4.9K. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while LOCM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas LOCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LOCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF and LOCM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LOCM's competition here
SPFYF vs ROII Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, ROII has a market cap of 3.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while ROII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas ROII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ROII's ROE of +2.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF and ROII have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ROII's competition here
SPFYF vs LOVLQ Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, LOVLQ has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while LOVLQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas LOVLQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LOVLQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF is less volatile compared to LOVLQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPFYF.Check LOVLQ's competition here
SPFYF vs ZZLL Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, ZZLL has a market cap of 2K. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while ZZLL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas ZZLL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZZLL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF is less volatile compared to ZZLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPFYF.Check ZZLL's competition here
SPFYF vs DATI Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, DATI has a market cap of 1.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while DATI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas DATI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DATI's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF and DATI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DATI's competition here
SPFYF vs INTH Comparison August 2025
SPFYF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPFYF stands at 571.8K. In comparison, INTH has a market cap of 824. Regarding current trading prices, SPFYF is priced at $0.01, while INTH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPFYF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.05, whereas INTH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPFYF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INTH's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SPFYF is less volatile compared to INTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPFYF.Check INTH's competition here