Sound Energy plc
Sound Energy plc SOU.L Peers
See (SOU.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOU.L | $0.85 | +1.76% | 17.69M | -0.14 | -$0.06 | N/A |
| WDS.L | $1,260.00 | N/A | 23.92B | 16.36 | $0.77 | +4.63% |
| NVTK.IL | $70.50 | N/A | 21.14B | 3.67 | $19.21 | N/A |
| 0HTF.L | $599.99 | +1.07% | 15.90B | -16.38 | -$36.63 | N/A |
| 0V1L.L | $104.50 | +0.90% | 12.61B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 0HVD.L | $13.49 | +0.45% | 9.45B | N/A | N/A | +5.26% |
| HBR.L | $177.40 | -0.45% | 2.54B | -22.17 | -$0.08 | +10.01% |
| ITH.L | $141.20 | +1.58% | 2.34B | 14.12 | $0.10 | +18.76% |
| ENOG.L | $944.50 | +0.27% | 1.74B | 19.28 | $0.49 | +4.78% |
| SEPL.L | $198.60 | +0.30% | 1.17B | 9.03 | $0.22 | +1.25% |
Stock Comparison
SOU.L vs WDS.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, WDS.L has a market cap of 23.92B. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while WDS.L trades at $1,260.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas WDS.L's P/E ratio is 16.36. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to WDS.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is more volatile compared to WDS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs NVTK.IL Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, NVTK.IL has a market cap of 21.14B. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while NVTK.IL trades at $70.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas NVTK.IL's P/E ratio is 3.67. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to NVTK.IL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is more volatile compared to NVTK.IL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs 0HTF.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, 0HTF.L has a market cap of 15.90B. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while 0HTF.L trades at $599.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas 0HTF.L's P/E ratio is -16.38. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to 0HTF.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is more volatile compared to 0HTF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs 0V1L.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, 0V1L.L has a market cap of 12.61B. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while 0V1L.L trades at $104.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas 0V1L.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to 0V1L.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is more volatile compared to 0V1L.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs 0HVD.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, 0HVD.L has a market cap of 9.45B. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while 0HVD.L trades at $13.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas 0HVD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to 0HVD.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is more volatile compared to 0HVD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs HBR.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, HBR.L has a market cap of 2.54B. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while HBR.L trades at $177.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas HBR.L's P/E ratio is -22.17. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to HBR.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is more volatile compared to HBR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs ITH.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, ITH.L has a market cap of 2.34B. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while ITH.L trades at $141.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas ITH.L's P/E ratio is 14.12. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to ITH.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is more volatile compared to ITH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs ENOG.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, ENOG.L has a market cap of 1.74B. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while ENOG.L trades at $944.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas ENOG.L's P/E ratio is 19.28. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to ENOG.L's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is more volatile compared to ENOG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs SEPL.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, SEPL.L has a market cap of 1.17B. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while SEPL.L trades at $198.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas SEPL.L's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to SEPL.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is more volatile compared to SEPL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs DEC.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, DEC.L has a market cap of 749.01M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while DEC.L trades at $1,019.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas DEC.L's P/E ratio is -7.38. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to DEC.L's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is more volatile compared to DEC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs KOS.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, KOS.L has a market cap of 633.36M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while KOS.L trades at $132.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas KOS.L's P/E ratio is -66.25. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to KOS.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is more volatile compared to KOS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs SQZ.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, SQZ.L has a market cap of 576.96M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while SQZ.L trades at $146.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas SQZ.L's P/E ratio is 8.64. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to SQZ.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is more volatile compared to SQZ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs PANR.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, PANR.L has a market cap of 484.63M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while PANR.L trades at $42.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas PANR.L's P/E ratio is -42.40. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to PANR.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is less volatile compared to PANR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs SAVE.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, SAVE.L has a market cap of 422.79M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while SAVE.L trades at $26.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas SAVE.L's P/E ratio is -26.25. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to SAVE.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is more volatile compared to SAVE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs 0MDP.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, 0MDP.L has a market cap of 366.55M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while 0MDP.L trades at $6.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas 0MDP.L's P/E ratio is 4.06. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to 0MDP.L's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is more volatile compared to 0MDP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs RKH.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, RKH.L has a market cap of 357.32M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while RKH.L trades at $55.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas RKH.L's P/E ratio is 27.80. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to RKH.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is more volatile compared to RKH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs GKP.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, GKP.L has a market cap of 336.79M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while GKP.L trades at $155.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas GKP.L's P/E ratio is 77.60. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to GKP.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is more volatile compared to GKP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs PTAL.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, PTAL.L has a market cap of 295.48M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while PTAL.L trades at $32.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas PTAL.L's P/E ratio is 4.03. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to PTAL.L's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is more volatile compared to PTAL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs EGY.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, EGY.L has a market cap of 290.69M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while EGY.L trades at $280.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas EGY.L's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to EGY.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is more volatile compared to EGY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs ENQ.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, ENQ.L has a market cap of 228.29M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while ENQ.L trades at $12.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas ENQ.L's P/E ratio is 3.07. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to ENQ.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is more volatile compared to ENQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs TLW.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, TLW.L has a market cap of 213.29M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while TLW.L trades at $14.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas TLW.L's P/E ratio is 4.87. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to TLW.L's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is more volatile compared to TLW.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs HUR.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, HUR.L has a market cap of 155.17M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while HUR.L trades at $7.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas HUR.L's P/E ratio is 1.95. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to HUR.L's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is more volatile compared to HUR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs I3E.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, I3E.L has a market cap of 153.19M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while I3E.L trades at $12.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas I3E.L's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to I3E.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is more volatile compared to I3E.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs GENL.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, GENL.L has a market cap of 150.33M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while GENL.L trades at $54.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas GENL.L's P/E ratio is -3.21. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to GENL.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is more volatile compared to GENL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs CNE.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, CNE.L has a market cap of 147.81M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while CNE.L trades at $215.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas CNE.L's P/E ratio is -17.96. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to CNE.L's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is less volatile compared to CNE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs GTE.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, GTE.L has a market cap of 134.25M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while GTE.L trades at $380.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas GTE.L's P/E ratio is -11.52. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to GTE.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is more volatile compared to GTE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs KIST.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, KIST.L has a market cap of 116.84M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while KIST.L trades at $141.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas KIST.L's P/E ratio is -2.94. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to KIST.L's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is more volatile compared to KIST.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs JSE.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, JSE.L has a market cap of 108.22M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while JSE.L trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas JSE.L's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to JSE.L's ROE of -2.58%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is more volatile compared to JSE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs AET.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, AET.L has a market cap of 93.85M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while AET.L trades at $41.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas AET.L's P/E ratio is 2.59. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to AET.L's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is less volatile compared to AET.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs PHAR.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, PHAR.L has a market cap of 81.54M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while PHAR.L trades at $19.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas PHAR.L's P/E ratio is 4.95. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to PHAR.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is more volatile compared to PHAR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs BCE.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, BCE.L has a market cap of 75.90M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while BCE.L trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas BCE.L's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to BCE.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is less volatile compared to BCE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs SLE.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, SLE.L has a market cap of 74.24M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while SLE.L trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas SLE.L's P/E ratio is 4.13. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to SLE.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is more volatile compared to SLE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs ZPHR.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, ZPHR.L has a market cap of 73.53M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while ZPHR.L trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas ZPHR.L's P/E ratio is 4.20. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to ZPHR.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is less volatile compared to ZPHR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs ENW.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, ENW.L has a market cap of 64.13M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while ENW.L trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas ENW.L's P/E ratio is 3.33. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to ENW.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is less volatile compared to ENW.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs CASP.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, CASP.L has a market cap of 61.21M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while CASP.L trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas CASP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to CASP.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is more volatile compared to CASP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs FOG.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, FOG.L has a market cap of 59.89M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while FOG.L trades at $5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas FOG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to FOG.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is more volatile compared to FOG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs WEN.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, WEN.L has a market cap of 58.56M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while WEN.L trades at $32.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas WEN.L's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to WEN.L's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SOU.L has daily volatility of 7.68 and WEN.L has daily volatility of N/A.
SOU.L vs BOR.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, BOR.L has a market cap of 54.85M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while BOR.L trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas BOR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to BOR.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is less volatile compared to BOR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs AXL.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, AXL.L has a market cap of 48.60M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while AXL.L trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas AXL.L's P/E ratio is 4.25. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to AXL.L's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is more volatile compared to AXL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs TXP.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, TXP.L has a market cap of 44.93M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while TXP.L trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas TXP.L's P/E ratio is -4.75. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to TXP.L's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is more volatile compared to TXP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs AEX.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, AEX.L has a market cap of 42.19M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while AEX.L trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas AEX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to AEX.L's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is less volatile compared to AEX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs JOG.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, JOG.L has a market cap of 36.91M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while JOG.L trades at $113.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas JOG.L's P/E ratio is -7.06. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to JOG.L's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is more volatile compared to JOG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs VLU.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, VLU.L has a market cap of 34.67M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while VLU.L trades at $35.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas VLU.L's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to VLU.L's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is more volatile compared to VLU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs ZEN.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, ZEN.L has a market cap of 30.24M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while ZEN.L trades at $10.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas ZEN.L's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to ZEN.L's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is less volatile compared to ZEN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs MATD.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, MATD.L has a market cap of 28.94M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while MATD.L trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas MATD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to MATD.L's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is less volatile compared to MATD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs ECO.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, ECO.L has a market cap of 27.74M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while ECO.L trades at $8.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas ECO.L's P/E ratio is -1.76. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to ECO.L's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is more volatile compared to ECO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs TRIN.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, TRIN.L has a market cap of 26.37M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while TRIN.L trades at $68.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas TRIN.L's P/E ratio is -7.56. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to TRIN.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is more volatile compared to TRIN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs EDR.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, EDR.L has a market cap of 24.88M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while EDR.L trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas EDR.L's P/E ratio is 4.40. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to EDR.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SOU.L has daily volatility of 7.68 and EDR.L has daily volatility of N/A.
SOU.L vs PXEN.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, PXEN.L has a market cap of 21.74M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while PXEN.L trades at $5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas PXEN.L's P/E ratio is 1.80. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to PXEN.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is more volatile compared to PXEN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs PRD.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, PRD.L has a market cap of 21.65M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while PRD.L trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas PRD.L's P/E ratio is -3.25. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to PRD.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is less volatile compared to PRD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs BOIL.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, BOIL.L has a market cap of 21.57M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while BOIL.L trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas BOIL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to BOIL.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is less volatile compared to BOIL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs CEG.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, CEG.L has a market cap of 20.82M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while CEG.L trades at $8.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas CEG.L's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to CEG.L's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is less volatile compared to CEG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs IGAS.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, IGAS.L has a market cap of 18.97M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while IGAS.L trades at $14.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas IGAS.L's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to IGAS.L's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is more volatile compared to IGAS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs CHAR.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, CHAR.L has a market cap of 18.42M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while CHAR.L trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas CHAR.L's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to CHAR.L's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is less volatile compared to CHAR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs PMG.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, PMG.L has a market cap of 15.84M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while PMG.L trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas PMG.L's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to PMG.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is more volatile compared to PMG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs CAD.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, CAD.L has a market cap of 12.56M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while CAD.L trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas CAD.L's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to CAD.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is less volatile compared to CAD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs UPL.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, UPL.L has a market cap of 12.43M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while UPL.L trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas UPL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to UPL.L's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is more volatile compared to UPL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs 88E.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, 88E.L has a market cap of 11.45M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while 88E.L trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas 88E.L's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to 88E.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is less volatile compared to 88E.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs TLOU.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, TLOU.L has a market cap of 10.96M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while TLOU.L trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas TLOU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to TLOU.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is less volatile compared to TLOU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs INDI.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, INDI.L has a market cap of 10.52M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while INDI.L trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas INDI.L's P/E ratio is 1.92. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to INDI.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is more volatile compared to INDI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs SOUC.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, SOUC.L has a market cap of 10.50M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while SOUC.L trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas SOUC.L's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to SOUC.L's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is more volatile compared to SOUC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs ANGS.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, ANGS.L has a market cap of 10.47M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while ANGS.L trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas ANGS.L's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to ANGS.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is more volatile compared to ANGS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs LBE.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, LBE.L has a market cap of 10.28M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while LBE.L trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas LBE.L's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to LBE.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is more volatile compared to LBE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs UJO.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, UJO.L has a market cap of 9.86M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while UJO.L trades at $9.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas UJO.L's P/E ratio is 9.25. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to UJO.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is more volatile compared to UJO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs PPP.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, PPP.L has a market cap of 9.58M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while PPP.L trades at $9.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas PPP.L's P/E ratio is -9.55. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to PPP.L's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is more volatile compared to PPP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs MSMN.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, MSMN.L has a market cap of 8.91M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while MSMN.L trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas MSMN.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to MSMN.L's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is less volatile compared to MSMN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs ORCA.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, ORCA.L has a market cap of 7.90M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while ORCA.L trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas ORCA.L's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to ORCA.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is more volatile compared to ORCA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs BLOE.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, BLOE.L has a market cap of 7.69M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while BLOE.L trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas BLOE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to BLOE.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is less volatile compared to BLOE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs TRP.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, TRP.L has a market cap of 7.62M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while TRP.L trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas TRP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to TRP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is more volatile compared to TRP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs EOG.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, EOG.L has a market cap of 6.95M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while EOG.L trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas EOG.L's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to EOG.L's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is less volatile compared to EOG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs DELT.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, DELT.L has a market cap of 6.05M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while DELT.L trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas DELT.L's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to DELT.L's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is less volatile compared to DELT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs GBP.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, GBP.L has a market cap of 5.91M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while GBP.L trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas GBP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to GBP.L's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is less volatile compared to GBP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs NOG.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, NOG.L has a market cap of 5.86M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while NOG.L trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas NOG.L's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to NOG.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is more volatile compared to NOG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs CORO.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, CORO.L has a market cap of 5.53M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while CORO.L trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas CORO.L's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to CORO.L's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is more volatile compared to CORO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs IOG.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, IOG.L has a market cap of 4.99M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while IOG.L trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas IOG.L's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to IOG.L's ROE of -1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SOU.L has daily volatility of 7.68 and IOG.L has daily volatility of N/A.
SOU.L vs SENX.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, SENX.L has a market cap of 4.99M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while SENX.L trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas SENX.L's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to SENX.L's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is more volatile compared to SENX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs BLVN.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, BLVN.L has a market cap of 4.71M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while BLVN.L trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas BLVN.L's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to BLVN.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is less volatile compared to BLVN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs RBD.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, RBD.L has a market cap of 4.69M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while RBD.L trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas RBD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to RBD.L's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is less volatile compared to RBD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs GEEC.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, GEEC.L has a market cap of 4.17M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while GEEC.L trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas GEEC.L's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to GEEC.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is more volatile compared to GEEC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs SYN.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, SYN.L has a market cap of 3.04M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while SYN.L trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas SYN.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to SYN.L's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is more volatile compared to SYN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs AST.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, AST.L has a market cap of 2.79M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while AST.L trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas AST.L's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to AST.L's ROE of +4.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is more volatile compared to AST.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs CLON.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, CLON.L has a market cap of 2.58M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while CLON.L trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas CLON.L's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to CLON.L's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is less volatile compared to CLON.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs UOG.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, UOG.L has a market cap of 2.54M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while UOG.L trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas UOG.L's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to UOG.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is less volatile compared to UOG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs WCAT.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, WCAT.L has a market cap of 2.49M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while WCAT.L trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas WCAT.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to WCAT.L's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is more volatile compared to WCAT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs PET.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, PET.L has a market cap of 2.28M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while PET.L trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas PET.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to PET.L's ROE of +1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is more volatile compared to PET.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs COPL.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, COPL.L has a market cap of 2.11M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while COPL.L trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas COPL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to COPL.L's ROE of -1.92%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is more volatile compared to COPL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs SCIR.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, SCIR.L has a market cap of 2.03M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while SCIR.L trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas SCIR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to SCIR.L's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is less volatile compared to SCIR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs TOM.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, TOM.L has a market cap of 1.93M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while TOM.L trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas TOM.L's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to TOM.L's ROE of -2.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is less volatile compared to TOM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs UKOG.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, UKOG.L has a market cap of 1.69M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while UKOG.L trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas UKOG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to UKOG.L's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is less volatile compared to UKOG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs STA.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, STA.L has a market cap of 1.58M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while STA.L trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas STA.L's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to STA.L's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is more volatile compared to STA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs ADME.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, ADME.L has a market cap of 1.44M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while ADME.L trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas ADME.L's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to ADME.L's ROE of -5.84%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is less volatile compared to ADME.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs LOGP.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, LOGP.L has a market cap of 1.30M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while LOGP.L trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas LOGP.L's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to LOGP.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is more volatile compared to LOGP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs NTOG.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, NTOG.L has a market cap of 1.22M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while NTOG.L trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas NTOG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to NTOG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is more volatile compared to NTOG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs EME.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, EME.L has a market cap of 1.03M. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while EME.L trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas EME.L's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to EME.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is less volatile compared to EME.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs MEN.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, MEN.L has a market cap of 990256.00. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while MEN.L trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas MEN.L's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to MEN.L's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is less volatile compared to MEN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs PTR.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, PTR.L has a market cap of 857432.00. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while PTR.L trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas PTR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to PTR.L's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is more volatile compared to PTR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs ARG.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, ARG.L has a market cap of 822993.00. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while ARG.L trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas ARG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to ARG.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SOU.L has daily volatility of 7.68 and ARG.L has daily volatility of N/A.
SOU.L vs WTE.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, WTE.L has a market cap of 576204.00. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while WTE.L trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas WTE.L's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to WTE.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is more volatile compared to WTE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.
SOU.L vs SDX.L Comparison
SOU.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOU.L stands at 17.69M. In comparison, SDX.L has a market cap of 531864.00. Regarding current trading prices, SOU.L is priced at $0.85, while SDX.L trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOU.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas SDX.L's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, SOU.L's ROE is -8.25%, compared to SDX.L's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, SOU.L is less volatile compared to SDX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOU.L.