Sosandar Plc
Sosandar Plc SOS.L Peers
See (SOS.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOS.L | £8.75 | -0.97% | 21.7M | 8.75 | £0.01 | N/A |
| 0R1O.IL | £204.70 | -0.80% | 2.2T | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 0JVQ.L | £225.16 | -1.60% | 126.2B | 18.29 | £12.31 | +2.04% |
| 0K0E.L | £2,480.79 | -3.81% | 125.8B | 679.48 | £3.65 | N/A |
| 0KAB.L | £1,390.00 | +1.90% | 79.2B | 44.48 | £31.25 | N/A |
| 0HJL.L | £3,717.00 | -0.05% | 62.2B | 32.81 | £113.30 | N/A |
| 0KXO.L | £143.07 | +0.76% | 47B | 31.79 | £4.50 | +1.05% |
| 0LD8.L | £96.90 | +3.03% | 44B | 8.00 | £12.11 | +4.62% |
| 0R3D.L | £72.74 | +0.08% | 33.5B | 18.45 | £3.94 | +1.42% |
| 0IC7.L | £113.46 | -0.36% | 25B | 11.63 | £9.75 | +2.08% |
Stock Comparison
SOS.L vs 0R1O.IL Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, 0R1O.IL has a market cap of 2.2T. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while 0R1O.IL trades at £204.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas 0R1O.IL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0R1O.IL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is more volatile compared to 0R1O.IL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs 0JVQ.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, 0JVQ.L has a market cap of 126.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while 0JVQ.L trades at £225.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas 0JVQ.L's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0JVQ.L's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is more volatile compared to 0JVQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs 0K0E.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, 0K0E.L has a market cap of 125.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while 0K0E.L trades at £2,480.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas 0K0E.L's P/E ratio is 679.48. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0K0E.L's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is less volatile compared to 0K0E.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs 0KAB.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, 0KAB.L has a market cap of 79.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while 0KAB.L trades at £1,390.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas 0KAB.L's P/E ratio is 44.48. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0KAB.L's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is more volatile compared to 0KAB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs 0HJL.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, 0HJL.L has a market cap of 62.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while 0HJL.L trades at £3,717.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas 0HJL.L's P/E ratio is 32.81. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0HJL.L's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is more volatile compared to 0HJL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs 0KXO.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, 0KXO.L has a market cap of 47B. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while 0KXO.L trades at £143.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas 0KXO.L's P/E ratio is 31.79. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0KXO.L's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is more volatile compared to 0KXO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs 0LD8.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, 0LD8.L has a market cap of 44B. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while 0LD8.L trades at £96.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas 0LD8.L's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0LD8.L's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is more volatile compared to 0LD8.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs 0R3D.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, 0R3D.L has a market cap of 33.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while 0R3D.L trades at £72.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas 0R3D.L's P/E ratio is 18.45. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0R3D.L's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is more volatile compared to 0R3D.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs 0IC7.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, 0IC7.L has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while 0IC7.L trades at £113.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas 0IC7.L's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0IC7.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is more volatile compared to 0IC7.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs 0LIB.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, 0LIB.L has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while 0LIB.L trades at £464.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas 0LIB.L's P/E ratio is 23.05. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0LIB.L's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is more volatile compared to 0LIB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs 0IC8.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, 0IC8.L has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while 0IC8.L trades at £94.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas 0IC8.L's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0IC8.L's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is more volatile compared to 0IC8.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs 0LXC.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, 0LXC.L has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while 0LXC.L trades at £159.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas 0LXC.L's P/E ratio is 10.35. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0LXC.L's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is more volatile compared to 0LXC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs 0IUX.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, 0IUX.L has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while 0IUX.L trades at £125.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas 0IUX.L's P/E ratio is 19.45. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0IUX.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is more volatile compared to 0IUX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs 0R18.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, 0R18.L has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while 0R18.L trades at £72.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas 0R18.L's P/E ratio is 8.01. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0R18.L's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is more volatile compared to 0R18.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs 0HTQ.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, 0HTQ.L has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while 0HTQ.L trades at £65.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas 0HTQ.L's P/E ratio is 9.46. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0HTQ.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is more volatile compared to 0HTQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs 0QVE.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, 0QVE.L has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while 0QVE.L trades at £575.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas 0QVE.L's P/E ratio is 129.13. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0QVE.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is more volatile compared to 0QVE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs 0IPD.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, 0IPD.L has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while 0IPD.L trades at £125.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas 0IPD.L's P/E ratio is 26.97. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0IPD.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is more volatile compared to 0IPD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs 0IIW.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, 0IIW.L has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while 0IIW.L trades at £64.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas 0IIW.L's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0IIW.L's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is more volatile compared to 0IIW.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs 0RCW.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, 0RCW.L has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while 0RCW.L trades at £151.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas 0RCW.L's P/E ratio is 15.78. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0RCW.L's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is more volatile compared to 0RCW.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs 0JSC.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, 0JSC.L has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while 0JSC.L trades at £26.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas 0JSC.L's P/E ratio is 5.77. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0JSC.L's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is more volatile compared to 0JSC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs 0SOM.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, 0SOM.L has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while 0SOM.L trades at £25.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas 0SOM.L's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0SOM.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is more volatile compared to 0SOM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs JD.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, JD.L has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while JD.L trades at £80.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas JD.L's P/E ratio is 8.06. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JD.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is more volatile compared to JD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs 0R32.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, 0R32.L has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while 0R32.L trades at £82.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas 0R32.L's P/E ratio is 23.95. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0R32.L's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is more volatile compared to 0R32.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs DFIB.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, DFIB.L has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while DFIB.L trades at £9.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas DFIB.L's P/E ratio is -50.94. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DFIB.L's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is more volatile compared to DFIB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs 0KTF.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, 0KTF.L has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while 0KTF.L trades at £183.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas 0KTF.L's P/E ratio is 6.16. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0KTF.L's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is more volatile compared to 0KTF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs FRAS.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, FRAS.L has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while FRAS.L trades at £728.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas FRAS.L's P/E ratio is 10.12. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FRAS.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is more volatile compared to FRAS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs 0H9G.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, 0H9G.L has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while 0H9G.L trades at £52.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas 0H9G.L's P/E ratio is 5.83. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0H9G.L's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is more volatile compared to 0H9G.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs ROO.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, ROO.L has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while ROO.L trades at £175.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas ROO.L's P/E ratio is 58.57. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ROO.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is more volatile compared to ROO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs DNLM.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, DNLM.L has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while DNLM.L trades at £1,193.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas DNLM.L's P/E ratio is 15.91. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DNLM.L's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is more volatile compared to DNLM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs JET.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, JET.L has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while JET.L trades at £1,134.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas JET.L's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JET.L's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is more volatile compared to JET.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs 0IQK.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, 0IQK.L has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while 0IQK.L trades at £24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas 0IQK.L's P/E ratio is 2.97. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0IQK.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is more volatile compared to 0IQK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs 0HSU.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, 0HSU.L has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while 0HSU.L trades at £17.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas 0HSU.L's P/E ratio is 3.08. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0HSU.L's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is more volatile compared to 0HSU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs 0QK3.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, 0QK3.L has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while 0QK3.L trades at £35.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas 0QK3.L's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0QK3.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is more volatile compared to 0QK3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs SMWH.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, SMWH.L has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while SMWH.L trades at £1,053.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas SMWH.L's P/E ratio is 210.60. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SMWH.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is more volatile compared to SMWH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs CURY.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, CURY.L has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while CURY.L trades at £122.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas CURY.L's P/E ratio is 24.40. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CURY.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is more volatile compared to CURY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs PETS.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, PETS.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while PETS.L trades at £259.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas PETS.L's P/E ratio is 13.63. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PETS.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is less volatile compared to PETS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs 0JRL.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, 0JRL.L has a market cap of 928.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while 0JRL.L trades at £8.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas 0JRL.L's P/E ratio is 1.31. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0JRL.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is more volatile compared to 0JRL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs MOON.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, MOON.L has a market cap of 825.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while MOON.L trades at £249.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas MOON.L's P/E ratio is -41.50. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MOON.L's ROE of +1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is more volatile compared to MOON.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs AO.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, AO.L has a market cap of 575.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while AO.L trades at £101.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas AO.L's P/E ratio is 25.30. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AO.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is more volatile compared to AO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs ASC.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, ASC.L has a market cap of 379M. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while ASC.L trades at £318.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas ASC.L's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ASC.L's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is less volatile compared to ASC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs 0KDU.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, 0KDU.L has a market cap of 377.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while 0KDU.L trades at £6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas 0KDU.L's P/E ratio is 0.82. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0KDU.L's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is less volatile compared to 0KDU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs HFD.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, HFD.L has a market cap of 375.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while HFD.L trades at £172.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas HFD.L's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HFD.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is more volatile compared to HFD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs BOO.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, BOO.L has a market cap of 364.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while BOO.L trades at £26.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas BOO.L's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BOO.L's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is more volatile compared to BOO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs 0RA5.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, 0RA5.L has a market cap of 342.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while 0RA5.L trades at £1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas 0RA5.L's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0RA5.L's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is more volatile compared to 0RA5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs THG.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, THG.L has a market cap of 327.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while THG.L trades at £23.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas THG.L's P/E ratio is -1.81. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to THG.L's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is more volatile compared to THG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs CARD.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, CARD.L has a market cap of 324.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while CARD.L trades at £92.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas CARD.L's P/E ratio is 6.63. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CARD.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is more volatile compared to CARD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs DEBS.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, DEBS.L has a market cap of 313.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while DEBS.L trades at £20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas DEBS.L's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DEBS.L's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is more volatile compared to DEBS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs 0ROF.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, 0ROF.L has a market cap of 229.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while 0ROF.L trades at £11.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas 0ROF.L's P/E ratio is 5.26. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0ROF.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is more volatile compared to 0ROF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs BWNG.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, BWNG.L has a market cap of 185.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while BWNG.L trades at £39.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas BWNG.L's P/E ratio is 39.70. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BWNG.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is more volatile compared to BWNG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs 0OQX.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, 0OQX.L has a market cap of 106.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while 0OQX.L trades at £7.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas 0OQX.L's P/E ratio is -5.34. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0OQX.L's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is more volatile compared to 0OQX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs SCS.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, SCS.L has a market cap of 95.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while SCS.L trades at £270.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas SCS.L's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SCS.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is more volatile compared to SCS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs IGR.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, IGR.L has a market cap of 85.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while IGR.L trades at £88.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas IGR.L's P/E ratio is 7.33. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IGR.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is more volatile compared to IGR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs 0RP3.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, 0RP3.L has a market cap of 80.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while 0RP3.L trades at £2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas 0RP3.L's P/E ratio is 4.04. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0RP3.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is more volatile compared to 0RP3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs MRK.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, MRK.L has a market cap of 61.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while MRK.L trades at £58.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas MRK.L's P/E ratio is -58.50. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MRK.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is more volatile compared to MRK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs PROC.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, PROC.L has a market cap of 38.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while PROC.L trades at £35.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas PROC.L's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PROC.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is less volatile compared to PROC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs ANG.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, ANG.L has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while ANG.L trades at £49.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas ANG.L's P/E ratio is 24.75. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ANG.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is less volatile compared to ANG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs G4M.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, G4M.L has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while G4M.L trades at £150.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas G4M.L's P/E ratio is 30.00. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to G4M.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is less volatile compared to G4M.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs WRKS.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, WRKS.L has a market cap of 28.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while WRKS.L trades at £42.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas WRKS.L's P/E ratio is 2.04. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WRKS.L's ROE of +1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is less volatile compared to WRKS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs HRN.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, HRN.L has a market cap of 26.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while HRN.L trades at £15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas HRN.L's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HRN.L's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is less volatile compared to HRN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs MTC.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, MTC.L has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while MTC.L trades at £2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas MTC.L's P/E ratio is 2.67. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MTC.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is less volatile compared to MTC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs PODP.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, PODP.L has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while PODP.L trades at £6.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas PODP.L's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PODP.L's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is more volatile compared to PODP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs MMAG.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, MMAG.L has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while MMAG.L trades at £8.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas MMAG.L's P/E ratio is -1.28. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MMAG.L's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is more volatile compared to MMAG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs SCHO.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, SCHO.L has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while SCHO.L trades at £44.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas SCHO.L's P/E ratio is 14.67. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SCHO.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is less volatile compared to SCHO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs 0DQK.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, 0DQK.L has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while 0DQK.L trades at £6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas 0DQK.L's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0DQK.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is more volatile compared to 0DQK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs DISP.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, DISP.L has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while DISP.L trades at £0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas DISP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DISP.L's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is more volatile compared to DISP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs UBG.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, UBG.L has a market cap of 488.7K. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while UBG.L trades at £0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas UBG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to UBG.L's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is more volatile compared to UBG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs ITS.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, ITS.L has a market cap of 406.9K. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while ITS.L trades at £0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas ITS.L's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ITS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is more volatile compared to ITS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs 0IJU.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, 0IJU.L has a market cap of 749. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while 0IJU.L trades at £0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas 0IJU.L's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0IJU.L's ROE of +1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is more volatile compared to 0IJU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs MEAL.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, MEAL.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while MEAL.L trades at £1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas MEAL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MEAL.L's ROE of -41.10%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SOS.L has daily volatility of 5.71 and MEAL.L has daily volatility of N/A.
SOS.L vs SGI.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, SGI.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while SGI.L trades at £1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas SGI.L's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SGI.L's ROE of -2.85%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is less volatile compared to SGI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs MADE.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, MADE.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while MADE.L trades at £0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas MADE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MADE.L's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SOS.L has daily volatility of 5.71 and MADE.L has daily volatility of N/A.
SOS.L vs MYSL.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, MYSL.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while MYSL.L trades at £2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas MYSL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MYSL.L's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SOS.L has daily volatility of 5.71 and MYSL.L has daily volatility of N/A.
SOS.L vs DC.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, DC.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while DC.L trades at £137.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas DC.L's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DC.L's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is more volatile compared to DC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs STU.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, STU.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while STU.L trades at £115.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas STU.L's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to STU.L's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is more volatile compared to STU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.
SOS.L vs 0M1U.L Comparison
SOS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOS.L stands at 21.7M. In comparison, 0M1U.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SOS.L is priced at £8.75, while 0M1U.L trades at £72.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.75, whereas 0M1U.L's P/E ratio is 19.42. In terms of profitability, SOS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0M1U.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SOS.L is less volatile compared to 0M1U.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOS.L.