Sopra Steria Group SA
Sopra Steria Group SA SOP.PA Peers
See (SOP.PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Information Technology Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOP.PA | $193.80 | +0.88% | 3.80B | 12.74 | $15.21 | +2.40% |
| IBMA.BR | $145.00 | -0.24% | 132.10B | 61.70 | $2.35 | N/A |
| CAP.PA | $155.90 | +0.48% | 26.50B | 16.46 | $9.47 | +2.18% |
| ATE.PA | $76.30 | +0.93% | 2.65B | 14.34 | $5.32 | +1.97% |
| WAVE.PA | $52.70 | +3.13% | 1.29B | 19.81 | $2.66 | +0.72% |
| NRO.PA | $47.30 | -0.11% | 1.15B | 21.90 | $2.16 | +2.54% |
| ATO.PA | $42.00 | N/A | 799.51M | 0.14 | $310.00 | N/A |
| SNC.LS | $2.44 | -1.59% | 746.08M | 40.67 | $0.06 | +2.87% |
| AUB.PA | $44.00 | -1.12% | 562.68M | 15.02 | $2.93 | +4.55% |
| ORDI.AS | $5.70 | +0.35% | 513.09M | 23.75 | $0.24 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SOP.PA vs IBMA.BR Comparison
SOP.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOP.PA stands at 3.80B. In comparison, IBMA.BR has a market cap of 132.10B. Regarding current trading prices, SOP.PA is priced at $193.80, while IBMA.BR trades at $145.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas IBMA.BR's P/E ratio is 61.70. In terms of profitability, SOP.PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IBMA.BR's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SOP.PA is less volatile compared to IBMA.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOP.PA.
SOP.PA vs CAP.PA Comparison
SOP.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOP.PA stands at 3.80B. In comparison, CAP.PA has a market cap of 26.50B. Regarding current trading prices, SOP.PA is priced at $193.80, while CAP.PA trades at $155.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas CAP.PA's P/E ratio is 16.46. In terms of profitability, SOP.PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CAP.PA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SOP.PA is less volatile compared to CAP.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOP.PA.
SOP.PA vs ATE.PA Comparison
SOP.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOP.PA stands at 3.80B. In comparison, ATE.PA has a market cap of 2.65B. Regarding current trading prices, SOP.PA is priced at $193.80, while ATE.PA trades at $76.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas ATE.PA's P/E ratio is 14.34. In terms of profitability, SOP.PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ATE.PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SOP.PA is less volatile compared to ATE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOP.PA.
SOP.PA vs WAVE.PA Comparison
SOP.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOP.PA stands at 3.80B. In comparison, WAVE.PA has a market cap of 1.29B. Regarding current trading prices, SOP.PA is priced at $193.80, while WAVE.PA trades at $52.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas WAVE.PA's P/E ratio is 19.81. In terms of profitability, SOP.PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WAVE.PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SOP.PA is less volatile compared to WAVE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOP.PA.
SOP.PA vs NRO.PA Comparison
SOP.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOP.PA stands at 3.80B. In comparison, NRO.PA has a market cap of 1.15B. Regarding current trading prices, SOP.PA is priced at $193.80, while NRO.PA trades at $47.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas NRO.PA's P/E ratio is 21.90. In terms of profitability, SOP.PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NRO.PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SOP.PA is less volatile compared to NRO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOP.PA.
SOP.PA vs ATO.PA Comparison
SOP.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOP.PA stands at 3.80B. In comparison, ATO.PA has a market cap of 799.51M. Regarding current trading prices, SOP.PA is priced at $193.80, while ATO.PA trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas ATO.PA's P/E ratio is 0.14. In terms of profitability, SOP.PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ATO.PA's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SOP.PA is less volatile compared to ATO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOP.PA.
SOP.PA vs SNC.LS Comparison
SOP.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOP.PA stands at 3.80B. In comparison, SNC.LS has a market cap of 746.08M. Regarding current trading prices, SOP.PA is priced at $193.80, while SNC.LS trades at $2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas SNC.LS's P/E ratio is 40.67. In terms of profitability, SOP.PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SNC.LS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SOP.PA is more volatile compared to SNC.LS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOP.PA.
SOP.PA vs AUB.PA Comparison
SOP.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOP.PA stands at 3.80B. In comparison, AUB.PA has a market cap of 562.68M. Regarding current trading prices, SOP.PA is priced at $193.80, while AUB.PA trades at $44.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas AUB.PA's P/E ratio is 15.02. In terms of profitability, SOP.PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AUB.PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SOP.PA is less volatile compared to AUB.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOP.PA.
SOP.PA vs ORDI.AS Comparison
SOP.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOP.PA stands at 3.80B. In comparison, ORDI.AS has a market cap of 513.09M. Regarding current trading prices, SOP.PA is priced at $193.80, while ORDI.AS trades at $5.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas ORDI.AS's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, SOP.PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ORDI.AS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SOP.PA is more volatile compared to ORDI.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOP.PA.
SOP.PA vs GYQ.IR Comparison
SOP.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOP.PA stands at 3.80B. In comparison, GYQ.IR has a market cap of 500.53M. Regarding current trading prices, SOP.PA is priced at $193.80, while GYQ.IR trades at $21.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas GYQ.IR's P/E ratio is -22.55. In terms of profitability, SOP.PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GYQ.IR's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SOP.PA is more volatile compared to GYQ.IR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOP.PA.
SOP.PA vs NEDAP.AS Comparison
SOP.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOP.PA stands at 3.80B. In comparison, NEDAP.AS has a market cap of 428.91M. Regarding current trading prices, SOP.PA is priced at $193.80, while NEDAP.AS trades at $65.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas NEDAP.AS's P/E ratio is 23.09. In terms of profitability, SOP.PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NEDAP.AS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SOP.PA is less volatile compared to NEDAP.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOP.PA.
SOP.PA vs INF.PA Comparison
SOP.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOP.PA stands at 3.80B. In comparison, INF.PA has a market cap of 308.32M. Regarding current trading prices, SOP.PA is priced at $193.80, while INF.PA trades at $44.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas INF.PA's P/E ratio is 18.49. In terms of profitability, SOP.PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to INF.PA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SOP.PA is less volatile compared to INF.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOP.PA.
SOP.PA vs NBA.LS Comparison
SOP.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOP.PA stands at 3.80B. In comparison, NBA.LS has a market cap of 280.83M. Regarding current trading prices, SOP.PA is priced at $193.80, while NBA.LS trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas NBA.LS's P/E ratio is 47.06. In terms of profitability, SOP.PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NBA.LS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SOP.PA is less volatile compared to NBA.LS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOP.PA.
SOP.PA vs ECONB.BR Comparison
SOP.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOP.PA stands at 3.80B. In comparison, ECONB.BR has a market cap of 252.30M. Regarding current trading prices, SOP.PA is priced at $193.80, while ECONB.BR trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas ECONB.BR's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, SOP.PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ECONB.BR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SOP.PA is less volatile compared to ECONB.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOP.PA.
SOP.PA vs SQI.PA Comparison
SOP.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOP.PA stands at 3.80B. In comparison, SQI.PA has a market cap of 251.60M. Regarding current trading prices, SOP.PA is priced at $193.80, while SQI.PA trades at $54.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas SQI.PA's P/E ratio is 55.10. In terms of profitability, SOP.PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SQI.PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SOP.PA is more volatile compared to SQI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOP.PA.
SOP.PA vs S30.PA Comparison
SOP.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOP.PA stands at 3.80B. In comparison, S30.PA has a market cap of 171.40M. Regarding current trading prices, SOP.PA is priced at $193.80, while S30.PA trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas S30.PA's P/E ratio is -10.67. In terms of profitability, SOP.PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to S30.PA's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SOP.PA is less volatile compared to S30.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOP.PA.
SOP.PA vs MLCHE.PA Comparison
SOP.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOP.PA stands at 3.80B. In comparison, MLCHE.PA has a market cap of 146.05M. Regarding current trading prices, SOP.PA is priced at $193.80, while MLCHE.PA trades at $63.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas MLCHE.PA's P/E ratio is 17.07. In terms of profitability, SOP.PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MLCHE.PA's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SOP.PA is more volatile compared to MLCHE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOP.PA.
SOP.PA vs MLCNT.PA Comparison
SOP.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOP.PA stands at 3.80B. In comparison, MLCNT.PA has a market cap of 145.28M. Regarding current trading prices, SOP.PA is priced at $193.80, while MLCNT.PA trades at $66.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas MLCNT.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SOP.PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MLCNT.PA's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SOP.PA is less volatile compared to MLCNT.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOP.PA.
SOP.PA vs ALKEY.PA Comparison
SOP.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOP.PA stands at 3.80B. In comparison, ALKEY.PA has a market cap of 118.02M. Regarding current trading prices, SOP.PA is priced at $193.80, while ALKEY.PA trades at $7.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas ALKEY.PA's P/E ratio is 148.48. In terms of profitability, SOP.PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ALKEY.PA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SOP.PA is more volatile compared to ALKEY.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOP.PA.
SOP.PA vs ALMIC.PA Comparison
SOP.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOP.PA stands at 3.80B. In comparison, ALMIC.PA has a market cap of 84.07M. Regarding current trading prices, SOP.PA is priced at $193.80, while ALMIC.PA trades at $3.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas ALMIC.PA's P/E ratio is 312.00. In terms of profitability, SOP.PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ALMIC.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SOP.PA is more volatile compared to ALMIC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOP.PA.
SOP.PA vs GLINT.LS Comparison
SOP.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOP.PA stands at 3.80B. In comparison, GLINT.LS has a market cap of 51.73M. Regarding current trading prices, SOP.PA is priced at $193.80, while GLINT.LS trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas GLINT.LS's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, SOP.PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GLINT.LS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SOP.PA is more volatile compared to GLINT.LS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOP.PA.
SOP.PA vs ALMII.PA Comparison
SOP.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOP.PA stands at 3.80B. In comparison, ALMII.PA has a market cap of 48.69M. Regarding current trading prices, SOP.PA is priced at $193.80, while ALMII.PA trades at $8.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas ALMII.PA's P/E ratio is 23.44. In terms of profitability, SOP.PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ALMII.PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SOP.PA is more volatile compared to ALMII.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOP.PA.
SOP.PA vs CTAC.AS Comparison
SOP.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOP.PA stands at 3.80B. In comparison, CTAC.AS has a market cap of 47.26M. Regarding current trading prices, SOP.PA is priced at $193.80, while CTAC.AS trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas CTAC.AS's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, SOP.PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CTAC.AS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SOP.PA is more volatile compared to CTAC.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOP.PA.
SOP.PA vs AMUND.AS Comparison
SOP.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOP.PA stands at 3.80B. In comparison, AMUND.AS has a market cap of 45.89M. Regarding current trading prices, SOP.PA is priced at $193.80, while AMUND.AS trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas AMUND.AS's P/E ratio is -59.00. In terms of profitability, SOP.PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AMUND.AS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SOP.PA is more volatile compared to AMUND.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOP.PA.
SOP.PA vs ALITL.PA Comparison
SOP.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOP.PA stands at 3.80B. In comparison, ALITL.PA has a market cap of 43.64M. Regarding current trading prices, SOP.PA is priced at $193.80, while ALITL.PA trades at $25.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas ALITL.PA's P/E ratio is 10.76. In terms of profitability, SOP.PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ALITL.PA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SOP.PA is more volatile compared to ALITL.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOP.PA.
SOP.PA vs ALHIT.PA Comparison
SOP.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOP.PA stands at 3.80B. In comparison, ALHIT.PA has a market cap of 25.64M. Regarding current trading prices, SOP.PA is priced at $193.80, while ALHIT.PA trades at $15.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas ALHIT.PA's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, SOP.PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ALHIT.PA's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SOP.PA is more volatile compared to ALHIT.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOP.PA.
SOP.PA vs MLLOI.PA Comparison
SOP.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOP.PA stands at 3.80B. In comparison, MLLOI.PA has a market cap of 5.71M. Regarding current trading prices, SOP.PA is priced at $193.80, while MLLOI.PA trades at $15.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas MLLOI.PA's P/E ratio is -26.96. In terms of profitability, SOP.PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MLLOI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SOP.PA is more volatile compared to MLLOI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOP.PA.
SOP.PA vs FPG.PA Comparison
SOP.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOP.PA stands at 3.80B. In comparison, FPG.PA has a market cap of 2.10M. Regarding current trading prices, SOP.PA is priced at $193.80, while FPG.PA trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas FPG.PA's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, SOP.PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FPG.PA's ROE of -8.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SOP.PA is more volatile compared to FPG.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOP.PA.
SOP.PA vs RED.LS Comparison
SOP.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOP.PA stands at 3.80B. In comparison, RED.LS has a market cap of 1.01M. Regarding current trading prices, SOP.PA is priced at $193.80, while RED.LS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas RED.LS's P/E ratio is 0.30. In terms of profitability, SOP.PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RED.LS's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SOP.PA is less volatile compared to RED.LS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOP.PA.