Southern California Gas Company PFD SER A 6%
Southern California Gas Company PFD SER A 6% (SOCGP) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SOCGP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Midstream Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOCGP | $24.50 | -2.00% | 2.2B | 5.33 | $4.59 | +6.31% |
| EBRGF | $14.42 | +0.00% | 98.7B | N/A | N/A | +6.45% |
| ENBGF | $17.00 | +0.00% | 98.7B | N/A | N/A | +6.98% |
| EBBNF | $23.70 | +0.00% | 98.7B | 10.68 | $2.22 | +6.18% |
| ENNPF | $17.54 | +0.00% | 98.7B | N/A | N/A | +6.82% |
| EBGEF | $24.38 | +0.00% | 53.2B | 10.99 | $2.22 | +6.85% |
| EBBGF | $24.21 | -0.08% | 52.8B | 10.91 | $2.22 | +6.92% |
| TCANF | $5.39 | +0.00% | 49.6B | 2.12 | $2.54 | +6.47% |
| TNCAF | $13.50 | -1.09% | 48.3B | 5.32 | $2.54 | +7.21% |
| ENBRF | $16.00 | +0.00% | 34.9B | N/A | N/A | +8.00% |
Stock Comparison
SOCGP vs EBRGF Comparison August 2025
SOCGP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGP stands at 2.2B. In comparison, EBRGF has a market cap of 98.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGP is priced at $24.50, while EBRGF trades at $14.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGP currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas EBRGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SOCGP's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EBRGF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGP is less volatile compared to EBRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGP.Check EBRGF's competition here
SOCGP vs ENBGF Comparison August 2025
SOCGP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGP stands at 2.2B. In comparison, ENBGF has a market cap of 98.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGP is priced at $24.50, while ENBGF trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGP currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas ENBGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SOCGP's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ENBGF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGP is more volatile compared to ENBGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGP.Check ENBGF's competition here
SOCGP vs EBBNF Comparison August 2025
SOCGP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGP stands at 2.2B. In comparison, EBBNF has a market cap of 98.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGP is priced at $24.50, while EBBNF trades at $23.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGP currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas EBBNF's P/E ratio is 10.68. In terms of profitability, SOCGP's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EBBNF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGP is more volatile compared to EBBNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGP.Check EBBNF's competition here
SOCGP vs ENNPF Comparison August 2025
SOCGP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGP stands at 2.2B. In comparison, ENNPF has a market cap of 98.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGP is priced at $24.50, while ENNPF trades at $17.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGP currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas ENNPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SOCGP's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ENNPF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGP is more volatile compared to ENNPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGP.Check ENNPF's competition here
SOCGP vs EBGEF Comparison August 2025
SOCGP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGP stands at 2.2B. In comparison, EBGEF has a market cap of 53.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGP is priced at $24.50, while EBGEF trades at $24.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGP currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas EBGEF's P/E ratio is 10.99. In terms of profitability, SOCGP's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EBGEF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGP is more volatile compared to EBGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGP.Check EBGEF's competition here
SOCGP vs EBBGF Comparison August 2025
SOCGP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGP stands at 2.2B. In comparison, EBBGF has a market cap of 52.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGP is priced at $24.50, while EBBGF trades at $24.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGP currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas EBBGF's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, SOCGP's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EBBGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGP is more volatile compared to EBBGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGP.Check EBBGF's competition here
SOCGP vs TCANF Comparison August 2025
SOCGP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGP stands at 2.2B. In comparison, TCANF has a market cap of 49.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGP is priced at $24.50, while TCANF trades at $5.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGP currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas TCANF's P/E ratio is 2.12. In terms of profitability, SOCGP's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TCANF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGP is more volatile compared to TCANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGP.Check TCANF's competition here
SOCGP vs TNCAF Comparison August 2025
SOCGP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGP stands at 2.2B. In comparison, TNCAF has a market cap of 48.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGP is priced at $24.50, while TNCAF trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGP currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas TNCAF's P/E ratio is 5.32. In terms of profitability, SOCGP's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TNCAF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGP is more volatile compared to TNCAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGP.Check TNCAF's competition here
SOCGP vs ENBRF Comparison August 2025
SOCGP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGP stands at 2.2B. In comparison, ENBRF has a market cap of 34.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGP is priced at $24.50, while ENBRF trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGP currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas ENBRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SOCGP's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ENBRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGP is more volatile compared to ENBRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGP.Check ENBRF's competition here
SOCGP vs MPLXP Comparison August 2025
SOCGP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGP stands at 2.2B. In comparison, MPLXP has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGP is priced at $24.50, while MPLXP trades at $33.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGP currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas MPLXP's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, SOCGP's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MPLXP's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGP is more volatile compared to MPLXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGP.Check MPLXP's competition here
SOCGP vs EBRZF Comparison August 2025
SOCGP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGP stands at 2.2B. In comparison, EBRZF has a market cap of 32.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGP is priced at $24.50, while EBRZF trades at $14.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGP currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas EBRZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SOCGP's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EBRZF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGP is more volatile compared to EBRZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGP.Check EBRZF's competition here
SOCGP vs PMMBF Comparison August 2025
SOCGP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGP stands at 2.2B. In comparison, PMMBF has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGP is priced at $24.50, while PMMBF trades at $16.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGP currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas PMMBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SOCGP's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PMMBF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGP is less volatile compared to PMMBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGP.Check PMMBF's competition here
SOCGP vs SOCGM Comparison August 2025
SOCGP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGP stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SOCGM has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGP is priced at $24.50, while SOCGM trades at $24.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGP currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas SOCGM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SOCGP's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SOCGM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGP is more volatile compared to SOCGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGP.Check SOCGM's competition here
SOCGP vs PPLAF Comparison August 2025
SOCGP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGP stands at 2.2B. In comparison, PPLAF has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGP is priced at $24.50, while PPLAF trades at $18.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGP currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas PPLAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SOCGP's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PPLAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGP is more volatile compared to PPLAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGP.Check PPLAF's competition here
SOCGP vs PBNAF Comparison August 2025
SOCGP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGP stands at 2.2B. In comparison, PBNAF has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGP is priced at $24.50, while PBNAF trades at $17.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGP currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas PBNAF's P/E ratio is 9.94. In terms of profitability, SOCGP's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PBNAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGP is less volatile compared to PBNAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGP.Check PBNAF's competition here
SOCGP vs PMBPF Comparison August 2025
SOCGP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGP stands at 2.2B. In comparison, PMBPF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGP is priced at $24.50, while PMBPF trades at $16.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGP currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas PMBPF's P/E ratio is 9.20. In terms of profitability, SOCGP's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PMBPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGP is less volatile compared to PMBPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGP.Check PMBPF's competition here
SOCGP vs FRVWY Comparison August 2025
SOCGP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGP stands at 2.2B. In comparison, FRVWY has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGP is priced at $24.50, while FRVWY trades at $25.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGP currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas FRVWY's P/E ratio is 41.29. In terms of profitability, SOCGP's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FRVWY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGP is less volatile compared to FRVWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGP.Check FRVWY's competition here
SOCGP vs KEYUF Comparison August 2025
SOCGP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGP stands at 2.2B. In comparison, KEYUF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGP is priced at $24.50, while KEYUF trades at $31.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGP currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas KEYUF's P/E ratio is 18.11. In terms of profitability, SOCGP's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KEYUF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGP is more volatile compared to KEYUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGP.Check KEYUF's competition here
SOCGP vs EQTNP Comparison August 2025
SOCGP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGP stands at 2.2B. In comparison, EQTNP has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGP is priced at $24.50, while EQTNP trades at $22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGP currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas EQTNP's P/E ratio is -6.91. In terms of profitability, SOCGP's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EQTNP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGP is more volatile compared to EQTNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGP.Check EQTNP's competition here
SOCGP vs VOPKF Comparison August 2025
SOCGP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGP stands at 2.2B. In comparison, VOPKF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGP is priced at $24.50, while VOPKF trades at $50.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGP currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas VOPKF's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, SOCGP's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VOPKF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGP is more volatile compared to VOPKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGP.Check VOPKF's competition here
SOCGP vs VOPKY Comparison August 2025
SOCGP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGP stands at 2.2B. In comparison, VOPKY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGP is priced at $24.50, while VOPKY trades at $46.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGP currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas VOPKY's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, SOCGP's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VOPKY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGP is less volatile compared to VOPKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGP.Check VOPKY's competition here
SOCGP vs GBNXF Comparison August 2025
SOCGP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGP stands at 2.2B. In comparison, GBNXF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGP is priced at $24.50, while GBNXF trades at $18.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGP currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas GBNXF's P/E ratio is 25.93. In terms of profitability, SOCGP's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GBNXF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGP is more volatile compared to GBNXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGP.Check GBNXF's competition here
SOCGP vs TPZEF Comparison August 2025
SOCGP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGP stands at 2.2B. In comparison, TPZEF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGP is priced at $24.50, while TPZEF trades at $18.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGP currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas TPZEF's P/E ratio is 61.11. In terms of profitability, SOCGP's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TPZEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGP is more volatile compared to TPZEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGP.Check TPZEF's competition here
SOCGP vs FDVWF Comparison August 2025
SOCGP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGP stands at 2.2B. In comparison, FDVWF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGP is priced at $24.50, while FDVWF trades at $103.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGP currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas FDVWF's P/E ratio is 41.88. In terms of profitability, SOCGP's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FDVWF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGP is more volatile compared to FDVWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGP.Check FDVWF's competition here
SOCGP vs SPKOY Comparison August 2025
SOCGP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGP stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SPKOY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGP is priced at $24.50, while SPKOY trades at $24.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGP currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas SPKOY's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, SOCGP's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SPKOY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGP is more volatile compared to SPKOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGP.Check SPKOY's competition here
SOCGP vs SNPKF Comparison August 2025
SOCGP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGP stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SNPKF has a market cap of 945.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGP is priced at $24.50, while SNPKF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGP currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas SNPKF's P/E ratio is 5.43. In terms of profitability, SOCGP's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SNPKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGP is more volatile compared to SNPKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGP.Check SNPKF's competition here
SOCGP vs OGSRW Comparison August 2025
SOCGP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGP stands at 2.2B. In comparison, OGSRW has a market cap of 88.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGP is priced at $24.50, while OGSRW trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGP currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas OGSRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SOCGP's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OGSRW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGP is less volatile compared to OGSRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGP.Check OGSRW's competition here
SOCGP vs TWMIF Comparison August 2025
SOCGP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGP stands at 2.2B. In comparison, TWMIF has a market cap of 70.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGP is priced at $24.50, while TWMIF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGP currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas TWMIF's P/E ratio is -2.33. In terms of profitability, SOCGP's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TWMIF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGP is more volatile compared to TWMIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGP.Check TWMIF's competition here
SOCGP vs TTNN Comparison August 2025
SOCGP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGP stands at 2.2B. In comparison, TTNN has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGP is priced at $24.50, while TTNN trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGP currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas TTNN's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, SOCGP's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TTNN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGP is more volatile compared to TTNN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGP.Check TTNN's competition here
SOCGP vs AVACF Comparison August 2025
SOCGP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGP stands at 2.2B. In comparison, AVACF has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGP is priced at $24.50, while AVACF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGP currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas AVACF's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, SOCGP's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AVACF's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGP is more volatile compared to AVACF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGP.Check AVACF's competition here
SOCGP vs MRGE Comparison August 2025
SOCGP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGP stands at 2.2B. In comparison, MRGE has a market cap of 596.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGP is priced at $24.50, while MRGE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGP currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas MRGE's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, SOCGP's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MRGE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGP is more volatile compared to MRGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGP.Check MRGE's competition here
SOCGP vs CWPE Comparison August 2025
SOCGP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGP stands at 2.2B. In comparison, CWPE has a market cap of 561.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGP is priced at $24.50, while CWPE trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGP currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas CWPE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SOCGP's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CWPE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGP is less volatile compared to CWPE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGP.Check CWPE's competition here
SOCGP vs GMLPF Comparison August 2025
SOCGP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGP stands at 2.2B. In comparison, GMLPF has a market cap of 63.7K. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGP is priced at $24.50, while GMLPF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGP currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas GMLPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SOCGP's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GMLPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGP is less volatile compared to GMLPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGP.Check GMLPF's competition here
SOCGP vs LOGL Comparison August 2025
SOCGP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGP stands at 2.2B. In comparison, LOGL has a market cap of 9.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGP is priced at $24.50, while LOGL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGP currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas LOGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SOCGP's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LOGL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGP is less volatile compared to LOGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGP.Check LOGL's competition here
SOCGP vs FLST Comparison August 2025
SOCGP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGP stands at 2.2B. In comparison, FLST has a market cap of 400. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGP is priced at $24.50, while FLST trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGP currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas FLST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SOCGP's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FLST's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGP is less volatile compared to FLST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGP.Check FLST's competition here
SOCGP vs TIDE Comparison August 2025
SOCGP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGP stands at 2.2B. In comparison, TIDE has a market cap of 250. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGP is priced at $24.50, while TIDE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGP currently has a P/E ratio of 5.33, whereas TIDE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SOCGP's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TIDE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGP is more volatile compared to TIDE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGP.Check TIDE's competition here