Southern California Gas Company PFD 6%
Southern California Gas Company PFD 6% (SOCGM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SOCGM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Midstream Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOCGM | $24.41 | -4.27% | 15.9B | N/A | N/A | +6.15% |
| ENBGF | $17.00 | +0.00% | 98.7B | N/A | N/A | +6.98% |
| EBRGF | $14.42 | +0.00% | 98.7B | N/A | N/A | +6.45% |
| EBBNF | $23.70 | +0.00% | 98.7B | 10.68 | $2.22 | +6.18% |
| ENNPF | $17.54 | +0.00% | 98.7B | N/A | N/A | +6.82% |
| EBGEF | $24.38 | +0.00% | 53.2B | 10.99 | $2.22 | +6.85% |
| EBBGF | $24.21 | -0.08% | 52.8B | 10.91 | $2.22 | +6.92% |
| TCANF | $5.39 | +0.00% | 49.6B | 2.12 | $2.54 | +6.47% |
| TNCAF | $13.50 | -1.09% | 48.3B | 5.32 | $2.54 | +7.21% |
| ENBRF | $16.00 | +0.00% | 34.9B | N/A | N/A | +8.00% |
Stock Comparison
SOCGM vs ENBGF Comparison August 2025
SOCGM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, ENBGF has a market cap of 98.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGM is priced at $24.41, while ENBGF trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENBGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SOCGM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ENBGF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGM is more volatile compared to ENBGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGM.Check ENBGF's competition here
SOCGM vs EBRGF Comparison August 2025
SOCGM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, EBRGF has a market cap of 98.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGM is priced at $24.41, while EBRGF trades at $14.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EBRGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SOCGM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EBRGF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGM is more volatile compared to EBRGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGM.Check EBRGF's competition here
SOCGM vs EBBNF Comparison August 2025
SOCGM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, EBBNF has a market cap of 98.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGM is priced at $24.41, while EBBNF trades at $23.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EBBNF's P/E ratio is 10.68. In terms of profitability, SOCGM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EBBNF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGM is more volatile compared to EBBNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGM.Check EBBNF's competition here
SOCGM vs ENNPF Comparison August 2025
SOCGM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, ENNPF has a market cap of 98.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGM is priced at $24.41, while ENNPF trades at $17.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENNPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SOCGM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ENNPF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGM is more volatile compared to ENNPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGM.Check ENNPF's competition here
SOCGM vs EBGEF Comparison August 2025
SOCGM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, EBGEF has a market cap of 53.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGM is priced at $24.41, while EBGEF trades at $24.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EBGEF's P/E ratio is 10.99. In terms of profitability, SOCGM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EBGEF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGM is more volatile compared to EBGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGM.Check EBGEF's competition here
SOCGM vs EBBGF Comparison August 2025
SOCGM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, EBBGF has a market cap of 52.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGM is priced at $24.41, while EBBGF trades at $24.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EBBGF's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, SOCGM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EBBGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGM is more volatile compared to EBBGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGM.Check EBBGF's competition here
SOCGM vs TCANF Comparison August 2025
SOCGM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, TCANF has a market cap of 49.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGM is priced at $24.41, while TCANF trades at $5.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCANF's P/E ratio is 2.12. In terms of profitability, SOCGM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TCANF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGM is more volatile compared to TCANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGM.Check TCANF's competition here
SOCGM vs TNCAF Comparison August 2025
SOCGM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, TNCAF has a market cap of 48.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGM is priced at $24.41, while TNCAF trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TNCAF's P/E ratio is 5.32. In terms of profitability, SOCGM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TNCAF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGM is more volatile compared to TNCAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGM.Check TNCAF's competition here
SOCGM vs ENBRF Comparison August 2025
SOCGM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, ENBRF has a market cap of 34.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGM is priced at $24.41, while ENBRF trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENBRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SOCGM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ENBRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGM is more volatile compared to ENBRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGM.Check ENBRF's competition here
SOCGM vs MPLXP Comparison August 2025
SOCGM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, MPLXP has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGM is priced at $24.41, while MPLXP trades at $33.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MPLXP's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, SOCGM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MPLXP's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGM is more volatile compared to MPLXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGM.Check MPLXP's competition here
SOCGM vs EBRZF Comparison August 2025
SOCGM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, EBRZF has a market cap of 32.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGM is priced at $24.41, while EBRZF trades at $14.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EBRZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SOCGM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EBRZF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGM is more volatile compared to EBRZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGM.Check EBRZF's competition here
SOCGM vs PMMBF Comparison August 2025
SOCGM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, PMMBF has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGM is priced at $24.41, while PMMBF trades at $16.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMMBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SOCGM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PMMBF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGM is less volatile compared to PMMBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGM.Check PMMBF's competition here
SOCGM vs PPLAF Comparison August 2025
SOCGM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, PPLAF has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGM is priced at $24.41, while PPLAF trades at $18.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PPLAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SOCGM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PPLAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGM is more volatile compared to PPLAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGM.Check PPLAF's competition here
SOCGM vs PBNAF Comparison August 2025
SOCGM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, PBNAF has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGM is priced at $24.41, while PBNAF trades at $17.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PBNAF's P/E ratio is 9.94. In terms of profitability, SOCGM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PBNAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGM is more volatile compared to PBNAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGM.Check PBNAF's competition here
SOCGM vs PMBPF Comparison August 2025
SOCGM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, PMBPF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGM is priced at $24.41, while PMBPF trades at $16.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMBPF's P/E ratio is 9.20. In terms of profitability, SOCGM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PMBPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGM is less volatile compared to PMBPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGM.Check PMBPF's competition here
SOCGM vs FRVWY Comparison August 2025
SOCGM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, FRVWY has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGM is priced at $24.41, while FRVWY trades at $25.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRVWY's P/E ratio is 41.29. In terms of profitability, SOCGM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FRVWY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGM is less volatile compared to FRVWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGM.Check FRVWY's competition here
SOCGM vs KEYUF Comparison August 2025
SOCGM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, KEYUF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGM is priced at $24.41, while KEYUF trades at $31.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KEYUF's P/E ratio is 18.11. In terms of profitability, SOCGM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KEYUF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGM is more volatile compared to KEYUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGM.Check KEYUF's competition here
SOCGM vs EQTNP Comparison August 2025
SOCGM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, EQTNP has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGM is priced at $24.41, while EQTNP trades at $22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQTNP's P/E ratio is -6.91. In terms of profitability, SOCGM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EQTNP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGM is less volatile compared to EQTNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGM.Check EQTNP's competition here
SOCGM vs VOPKF Comparison August 2025
SOCGM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, VOPKF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGM is priced at $24.41, while VOPKF trades at $50.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOPKF's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, SOCGM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VOPKF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGM is more volatile compared to VOPKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGM.Check VOPKF's competition here
SOCGM vs VOPKY Comparison August 2025
SOCGM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, VOPKY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGM is priced at $24.41, while VOPKY trades at $46.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOPKY's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, SOCGM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VOPKY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGM is less volatile compared to VOPKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGM.Check VOPKY's competition here
SOCGM vs GBNXF Comparison August 2025
SOCGM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, GBNXF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGM is priced at $24.41, while GBNXF trades at $18.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBNXF's P/E ratio is 25.93. In terms of profitability, SOCGM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GBNXF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGM is less volatile compared to GBNXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGM.Check GBNXF's competition here
SOCGM vs TPZEF Comparison August 2025
SOCGM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, TPZEF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGM is priced at $24.41, while TPZEF trades at $18.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TPZEF's P/E ratio is 61.11. In terms of profitability, SOCGM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TPZEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGM is less volatile compared to TPZEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGM.Check TPZEF's competition here
SOCGM vs SOCGP Comparison August 2025
SOCGM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, SOCGP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGM is priced at $24.41, while SOCGP trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOCGP's P/E ratio is 5.33. In terms of profitability, SOCGM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SOCGP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGM is less volatile compared to SOCGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGM.Check SOCGP's competition here
SOCGM vs FDVWF Comparison August 2025
SOCGM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, FDVWF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGM is priced at $24.41, while FDVWF trades at $103.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FDVWF's P/E ratio is 41.88. In terms of profitability, SOCGM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FDVWF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGM is more volatile compared to FDVWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGM.Check FDVWF's competition here
SOCGM vs SPKOY Comparison August 2025
SOCGM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, SPKOY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGM is priced at $24.41, while SPKOY trades at $24.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPKOY's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, SOCGM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SPKOY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGM is less volatile compared to SPKOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGM.Check SPKOY's competition here
SOCGM vs SNPKF Comparison August 2025
SOCGM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, SNPKF has a market cap of 945.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGM is priced at $24.41, while SNPKF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNPKF's P/E ratio is 5.43. In terms of profitability, SOCGM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SNPKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGM is more volatile compared to SNPKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGM.Check SNPKF's competition here
SOCGM vs OGSRW Comparison August 2025
SOCGM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, OGSRW has a market cap of 88.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGM is priced at $24.41, while OGSRW trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OGSRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SOCGM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OGSRW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGM is less volatile compared to OGSRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGM.Check OGSRW's competition here
SOCGM vs TWMIF Comparison August 2025
SOCGM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, TWMIF has a market cap of 70.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGM is priced at $24.41, while TWMIF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TWMIF's P/E ratio is -2.33. In terms of profitability, SOCGM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TWMIF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGM is more volatile compared to TWMIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGM.Check TWMIF's competition here
SOCGM vs TTNN Comparison August 2025
SOCGM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, TTNN has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGM is priced at $24.41, while TTNN trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTNN's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, SOCGM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TTNN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGM is more volatile compared to TTNN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGM.Check TTNN's competition here
SOCGM vs AVACF Comparison August 2025
SOCGM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, AVACF has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGM is priced at $24.41, while AVACF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVACF's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, SOCGM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AVACF's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGM is more volatile compared to AVACF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGM.Check AVACF's competition here
SOCGM vs MRGE Comparison August 2025
SOCGM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, MRGE has a market cap of 596.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGM is priced at $24.41, while MRGE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRGE's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, SOCGM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MRGE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGM is more volatile compared to MRGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGM.Check MRGE's competition here
SOCGM vs CWPE Comparison August 2025
SOCGM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, CWPE has a market cap of 561.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGM is priced at $24.41, while CWPE trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CWPE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SOCGM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CWPE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGM is less volatile compared to CWPE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGM.Check CWPE's competition here
SOCGM vs GMLPF Comparison August 2025
SOCGM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, GMLPF has a market cap of 63.7K. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGM is priced at $24.41, while GMLPF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMLPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SOCGM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GMLPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGM is less volatile compared to GMLPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGM.Check GMLPF's competition here
SOCGM vs LOGL Comparison August 2025
SOCGM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, LOGL has a market cap of 9.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGM is priced at $24.41, while LOGL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LOGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SOCGM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LOGL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGM is less volatile compared to LOGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGM.Check LOGL's competition here
SOCGM vs FLST Comparison August 2025
SOCGM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, FLST has a market cap of 400. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGM is priced at $24.41, while FLST trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SOCGM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FLST's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGM is less volatile compared to FLST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGM.Check FLST's competition here
SOCGM vs TIDE Comparison August 2025
SOCGM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SOCGM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, TIDE has a market cap of 250. Regarding current trading prices, SOCGM is priced at $24.41, while TIDE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SOCGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIDE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SOCGM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TIDE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SOCGM is more volatile compared to TIDE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SOCGM.Check TIDE's competition here