China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation
China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation (SNPMF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SNPMF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Integrated Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNPMF | $0.66 | -4.81% | 120B | 17.50 | $0.04 | +4.54% |
| PCCYF | $1.17 | -1.68% | 296.2B | 10.04 | $0.12 | +5.38% |
| RYDAF | $38.57 | -1.23% | 227.9B | 13.38 | $3.00 | +3.66% |
| TTFNF | $77.88 | +0.06% | 173.4B | 12.58 | $6.19 | +4.90% |
| BPAQF | $6.28 | +1.95% | 97.3B | 63.30 | $0.10 | +5.18% |
| OMVKY | $16.36 | +0.64% | 85.6B | 23.11 | $0.71 | +8.04% |
| STOHF | $27.50 | +0.00% | 68.6B | 14.18 | $1.94 | +5.35% |
| RNFTF | $4.08 | +0.00% | 64.8B | 2.65 | $1.54 | N/A |
| EIPAF | $22.13 | +6.65% | 62.7B | 21.97 | $0.97 | +5.43% |
| LUKOY | $6.96 | -42.00% | 49B | 0.40 | $17.46 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SNPMF vs PCCYF Comparison February 2026
SNPMF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNPMF stands at 120B. In comparison, PCCYF has a market cap of 296.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SNPMF is priced at $0.66, while PCCYF trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas PCCYF's P/E ratio is 10.04. In terms of profitability, SNPMF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PCCYF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SNPMF is more volatile compared to PCCYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNPMF.Check PCCYF's competition here
SNPMF vs RYDAF Comparison February 2026
SNPMF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNPMF stands at 120B. In comparison, RYDAF has a market cap of 227.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SNPMF is priced at $0.66, while RYDAF trades at $38.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas RYDAF's P/E ratio is 13.38. In terms of profitability, SNPMF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RYDAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SNPMF is less volatile compared to RYDAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNPMF.Check RYDAF's competition here
SNPMF vs TTFNF Comparison February 2026
SNPMF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNPMF stands at 120B. In comparison, TTFNF has a market cap of 173.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SNPMF is priced at $0.66, while TTFNF trades at $77.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas TTFNF's P/E ratio is 12.58. In terms of profitability, SNPMF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TTFNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SNPMF is more volatile compared to TTFNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNPMF.Check TTFNF's competition here
SNPMF vs BPAQF Comparison February 2026
SNPMF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNPMF stands at 120B. In comparison, BPAQF has a market cap of 97.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SNPMF is priced at $0.66, while BPAQF trades at $6.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas BPAQF's P/E ratio is 63.30. In terms of profitability, SNPMF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BPAQF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SNPMF is more volatile compared to BPAQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNPMF.Check BPAQF's competition here
SNPMF vs OMVKY Comparison February 2026
SNPMF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNPMF stands at 120B. In comparison, OMVKY has a market cap of 85.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SNPMF is priced at $0.66, while OMVKY trades at $16.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas OMVKY's P/E ratio is 23.11. In terms of profitability, SNPMF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OMVKY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SNPMF is more volatile compared to OMVKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNPMF.Check OMVKY's competition here
SNPMF vs STOHF Comparison February 2026
SNPMF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNPMF stands at 120B. In comparison, STOHF has a market cap of 68.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SNPMF is priced at $0.66, while STOHF trades at $27.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas STOHF's P/E ratio is 14.18. In terms of profitability, SNPMF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to STOHF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SNPMF is more volatile compared to STOHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNPMF.Check STOHF's competition here
SNPMF vs RNFTF Comparison February 2026
SNPMF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNPMF stands at 120B. In comparison, RNFTF has a market cap of 64.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SNPMF is priced at $0.66, while RNFTF trades at $4.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas RNFTF's P/E ratio is 2.65. In terms of profitability, SNPMF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RNFTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SNPMF is more volatile compared to RNFTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNPMF.Check RNFTF's competition here
SNPMF vs EIPAF Comparison February 2026
SNPMF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNPMF stands at 120B. In comparison, EIPAF has a market cap of 62.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SNPMF is priced at $0.66, while EIPAF trades at $22.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas EIPAF's P/E ratio is 21.97. In terms of profitability, SNPMF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EIPAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SNPMF is more volatile compared to EIPAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNPMF.Check EIPAF's competition here
SNPMF vs LUKOY Comparison February 2026
SNPMF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNPMF stands at 120B. In comparison, LUKOY has a market cap of 49B. Regarding current trading prices, SNPMF is priced at $0.66, while LUKOY trades at $6.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas LUKOY's P/E ratio is 0.40. In terms of profitability, SNPMF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LUKOY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SNPMF is less volatile compared to LUKOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNPMF.Check LUKOY's competition here
SNPMF vs PUTRY Comparison February 2026
SNPMF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNPMF stands at 120B. In comparison, PUTRY has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SNPMF is priced at $0.66, while PUTRY trades at $5.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas PUTRY's P/E ratio is 15.61. In terms of profitability, SNPMF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PUTRY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SNPMF is more volatile compared to PUTRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNPMF.Check PUTRY's competition here
SNPMF vs PSKOF Comparison February 2026
SNPMF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNPMF stands at 120B. In comparison, PSKOF has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SNPMF is priced at $0.66, while PSKOF trades at $31.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas PSKOF's P/E ratio is 20.10. In terms of profitability, SNPMF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PSKOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SNPMF is more volatile compared to PSKOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNPMF.Check PSKOF's competition here
SNPMF vs PETFF Comparison February 2026
SNPMF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNPMF stands at 120B. In comparison, PETFF has a market cap of 33.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SNPMF is priced at $0.66, while PETFF trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas PETFF's P/E ratio is 16.63. In terms of profitability, SNPMF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PETFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SNPMF is more volatile compared to PETFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNPMF.Check PETFF's competition here
SNPMF vs GLPEY Comparison February 2026
SNPMF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNPMF stands at 120B. In comparison, GLPEY has a market cap of 32.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SNPMF is priced at $0.66, while GLPEY trades at $10.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas GLPEY's P/E ratio is 13.14. In terms of profitability, SNPMF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GLPEY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SNPMF is more volatile compared to GLPEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNPMF.Check GLPEY's competition here
SNPMF vs REPYY Comparison February 2026
SNPMF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNPMF stands at 120B. In comparison, REPYY has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SNPMF is priced at $0.66, while REPYY trades at $21.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas REPYY's P/E ratio is 19.23. In terms of profitability, SNPMF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to REPYY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SNPMF is more volatile compared to REPYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNPMF.Check REPYY's competition here
SNPMF vs PUTRF Comparison February 2026
SNPMF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNPMF stands at 120B. In comparison, PUTRF has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SNPMF is priced at $0.66, while PUTRF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas PUTRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNPMF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PUTRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SNPMF is more volatile compared to PUTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNPMF.Check PUTRF's competition here
SNPMF vs REPYF Comparison February 2026
SNPMF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNPMF stands at 120B. In comparison, REPYF has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, SNPMF is priced at $0.66, while REPYF trades at $19.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas REPYF's P/E ratio is 17.62. In terms of profitability, SNPMF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to REPYF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SNPMF is more volatile compared to REPYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNPMF.Check REPYF's competition here
SNPMF vs OMVJF Comparison February 2026
SNPMF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNPMF stands at 120B. In comparison, OMVJF has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SNPMF is priced at $0.66, while OMVJF trades at $59.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas OMVJF's P/E ratio is 20.80. In terms of profitability, SNPMF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OMVJF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SNPMF is more volatile compared to OMVJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNPMF.Check OMVJF's competition here
SNPMF vs GLPEF Comparison February 2026
SNPMF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNPMF stands at 120B. In comparison, GLPEF has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SNPMF is priced at $0.66, while GLPEF trades at $21.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas GLPEF's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, SNPMF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GLPEF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SNPMF is more volatile compared to GLPEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNPMF.Check GLPEF's competition here
SNPMF vs OGFGF Comparison February 2026
SNPMF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNPMF stands at 120B. In comparison, OGFGF has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SNPMF is priced at $0.66, while OGFGF trades at $7.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas OGFGF's P/E ratio is 14.17. In terms of profitability, SNPMF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OGFGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SNPMF is more volatile compared to OGFGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNPMF.Check OGFGF's competition here
SNPMF vs OGFGY Comparison February 2026
SNPMF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNPMF stands at 120B. In comparison, OGFGY has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SNPMF is priced at $0.66, while OGFGY trades at $7.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas OGFGY's P/E ratio is 18.98. In terms of profitability, SNPMF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OGFGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SNPMF is more volatile compared to OGFGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNPMF.Check OGFGY's competition here
SNPMF vs MGYOY Comparison February 2026
SNPMF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNPMF stands at 120B. In comparison, MGYOY has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SNPMF is priced at $0.66, while MGYOY trades at $5.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas MGYOY's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, SNPMF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MGYOY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SNPMF is less volatile compared to MGYOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNPMF.Check MGYOY's competition here
SNPMF vs ZNOGW Comparison February 2026
SNPMF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNPMF stands at 120B. In comparison, ZNOGW has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SNPMF is priced at $0.66, while ZNOGW trades at $4.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas ZNOGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNPMF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ZNOGW's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SNPMF is more volatile compared to ZNOGW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNPMF.Check ZNOGW's competition here
SNPMF vs OAOFY Comparison February 2026
SNPMF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNPMF stands at 120B. In comparison, OAOFY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SNPMF is priced at $0.66, while OAOFY trades at $9.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas OAOFY's P/E ratio is 1.17. In terms of profitability, SNPMF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OAOFY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SNPMF is more volatile compared to OAOFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNPMF.Check OAOFY's competition here
SNPMF vs SLTQY Comparison February 2026
SNPMF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNPMF stands at 120B. In comparison, SLTQY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SNPMF is priced at $0.66, while SLTQY trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas SLTQY's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, SNPMF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SLTQY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SNPMF is less volatile compared to SLTQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNPMF.Check SLTQY's competition here
SNPMF vs HLPMF Comparison February 2026
SNPMF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNPMF stands at 120B. In comparison, HLPMF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SNPMF is priced at $0.66, while HLPMF trades at $10.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas HLPMF's P/E ratio is 15.30. In terms of profitability, SNPMF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HLPMF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SNPMF is more volatile compared to HLPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNPMF.Check HLPMF's competition here
SNPMF vs ISRMF Comparison February 2026
SNPMF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNPMF stands at 120B. In comparison, ISRMF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SNPMF is priced at $0.66, while ISRMF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas ISRMF's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, SNPMF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ISRMF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SNPMF is more volatile compared to ISRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNPMF.Check ISRMF's competition here
SNPMF vs RTEXF Comparison February 2026
SNPMF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNPMF stands at 120B. In comparison, RTEXF has a market cap of 393.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SNPMF is priced at $0.66, while RTEXF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas RTEXF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, SNPMF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RTEXF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SNPMF is more volatile compared to RTEXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNPMF.Check RTEXF's competition here
SNPMF vs WDGJY Comparison February 2026
SNPMF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNPMF stands at 120B. In comparison, WDGJY has a market cap of 345.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SNPMF is priced at $0.66, while WDGJY trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas WDGJY's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, SNPMF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WDGJY's ROE of -4.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SNPMF is more volatile compared to WDGJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNPMF.Check WDGJY's competition here
SNPMF vs UNTC Comparison February 2026
SNPMF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNPMF stands at 120B. In comparison, UNTC has a market cap of 325.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SNPMF is priced at $0.66, while UNTC trades at $32.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas UNTC's P/E ratio is 4.90. In terms of profitability, SNPMF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to UNTC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SNPMF is more volatile compared to UNTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNPMF.Check UNTC's competition here
SNPMF vs WDGJF Comparison February 2026
SNPMF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNPMF stands at 120B. In comparison, WDGJF has a market cap of 241.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SNPMF is priced at $0.66, while WDGJF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas WDGJF's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, SNPMF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WDGJF's ROE of -4.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SNPMF is more volatile compared to WDGJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNPMF.Check WDGJF's competition here
SNPMF vs PXPEF Comparison February 2026
SNPMF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNPMF stands at 120B. In comparison, PXPEF has a market cap of 85M. Regarding current trading prices, SNPMF is priced at $0.66, while PXPEF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas PXPEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNPMF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PXPEF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SNPMF is more volatile compared to PXPEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNPMF.Check PXPEF's competition here
SNPMF vs SEGYY Comparison February 2026
SNPMF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNPMF stands at 120B. In comparison, SEGYY has a market cap of 33.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SNPMF is priced at $0.66, while SEGYY trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas SEGYY's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, SNPMF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SEGYY's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SNPMF is more volatile compared to SEGYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNPMF.Check SEGYY's competition here
SNPMF vs UNTCW Comparison February 2026
SNPMF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNPMF stands at 120B. In comparison, UNTCW has a market cap of 26.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SNPMF is priced at $0.66, while UNTCW trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas UNTCW's P/E ratio is 0.51. In terms of profitability, SNPMF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to UNTCW's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SNPMF is less volatile compared to UNTCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNPMF.Check UNTCW's competition here
SNPMF vs ECTM Comparison February 2026
SNPMF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNPMF stands at 120B. In comparison, ECTM has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SNPMF is priced at $0.66, while ECTM trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas ECTM's P/E ratio is 5.36. In terms of profitability, SNPMF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ECTM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SNPMF is more volatile compared to ECTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNPMF.Check ECTM's competition here
SNPMF vs OKMN Comparison February 2026
SNPMF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNPMF stands at 120B. In comparison, OKMN has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, SNPMF is priced at $0.66, while OKMN trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas OKMN's P/E ratio is -5.56. In terms of profitability, SNPMF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OKMN's ROE of +1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SNPMF is more volatile compared to OKMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNPMF.Check OKMN's competition here
SNPMF vs GRGUF Comparison February 2026
SNPMF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNPMF stands at 120B. In comparison, GRGUF has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SNPMF is priced at $0.66, while GRGUF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas GRGUF's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, SNPMF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GRGUF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SNPMF is more volatile compared to GRGUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNPMF.Check GRGUF's competition here
SNPMF vs PEMC Comparison February 2026
SNPMF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNPMF stands at 120B. In comparison, PEMC has a market cap of 966.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SNPMF is priced at $0.66, while PEMC trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas PEMC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNPMF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PEMC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SNPMF is more volatile compared to PEMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNPMF.Check PEMC's competition here
SNPMF vs POGS Comparison February 2026
SNPMF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNPMF stands at 120B. In comparison, POGS has a market cap of 920.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SNPMF is priced at $0.66, while POGS trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas POGS's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, SNPMF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to POGS's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, SNPMF is more volatile compared to POGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNPMF.Check POGS's competition here
SNPMF vs AEDC Comparison February 2026
SNPMF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNPMF stands at 120B. In comparison, AEDC has a market cap of 204.7K. Regarding current trading prices, SNPMF is priced at $0.66, while AEDC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas AEDC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SNPMF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AEDC's ROE of -1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, SNPMF is more volatile compared to AEDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNPMF.Check AEDC's competition here
SNPMF vs TRNX Comparison February 2026
SNPMF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNPMF stands at 120B. In comparison, TRNX has a market cap of 188.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SNPMF is priced at $0.66, while TRNX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas TRNX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SNPMF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TRNX's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, SNPMF is more volatile compared to TRNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNPMF.Check TRNX's competition here
SNPMF vs RRRI Comparison February 2026
SNPMF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNPMF stands at 120B. In comparison, RRRI has a market cap of 22K. Regarding current trading prices, SNPMF is priced at $0.66, while RRRI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas RRRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNPMF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RRRI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SNPMF is more volatile compared to RRRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNPMF.Check RRRI's competition here
SNPMF vs SNVP Comparison February 2026
SNPMF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNPMF stands at 120B. In comparison, SNVP has a market cap of 20.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SNPMF is priced at $0.66, while SNVP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas SNVP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNPMF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SNVP's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SNPMF is more volatile compared to SNVP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNPMF.Check SNVP's competition here
SNPMF vs FRMC Comparison February 2026
SNPMF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNPMF stands at 120B. In comparison, FRMC has a market cap of 19.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SNPMF is priced at $0.66, while FRMC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas FRMC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNPMF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FRMC's ROE of +15.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SNPMF is more volatile compared to FRMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNPMF.Check FRMC's competition here
SNPMF vs PGAS Comparison February 2026
SNPMF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNPMF stands at 120B. In comparison, PGAS has a market cap of 3.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SNPMF is priced at $0.66, while PGAS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas PGAS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SNPMF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PGAS's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, SNPMF is more volatile compared to PGAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNPMF.Check PGAS's competition here
SNPMF vs BNXR Comparison February 2026
SNPMF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNPMF stands at 120B. In comparison, BNXR has a market cap of 2.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SNPMF is priced at $0.66, while BNXR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas BNXR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNPMF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BNXR's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SNPMF is more volatile compared to BNXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNPMF.Check BNXR's competition here
SNPMF vs AMNE Comparison February 2026
SNPMF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNPMF stands at 120B. In comparison, AMNE has a market cap of 2.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SNPMF is priced at $0.66, while AMNE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas AMNE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNPMF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AMNE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SNPMF is more volatile compared to AMNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNPMF.Check AMNE's competition here
SNPMF vs NUSPQ Comparison February 2026
SNPMF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNPMF stands at 120B. In comparison, NUSPQ has a market cap of 1.9K. Regarding current trading prices, SNPMF is priced at $0.66, while NUSPQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas NUSPQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SNPMF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NUSPQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SNPMF is less volatile compared to NUSPQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNPMF.Check NUSPQ's competition here
SNPMF vs SNPTY Comparison February 2026
SNPMF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNPMF stands at 120B. In comparison, SNPTY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SNPMF is priced at $0.66, while SNPTY trades at $46.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas SNPTY's P/E ratio is 5.81. In terms of profitability, SNPMF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SNPTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SNPMF is less volatile compared to SNPTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNPMF.Check SNPTY's competition here
SNPMF vs SGTZY Comparison February 2026
SNPMF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNPMF stands at 120B. In comparison, SGTZY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SNPMF is priced at $0.66, while SGTZY trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas SGTZY's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, SNPMF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SGTZY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SNPMF is more volatile compared to SGTZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNPMF.Check SGTZY's competition here
SNPMF vs OJSCY Comparison February 2026
SNPMF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNPMF stands at 120B. In comparison, OJSCY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SNPMF is priced at $0.66, while OJSCY trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas OJSCY's P/E ratio is 1.95. In terms of profitability, SNPMF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OJSCY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SNPMF is more volatile compared to OJSCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNPMF.Check OJSCY's competition here
SNPMF vs POGWY Comparison February 2026
SNPMF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNPMF stands at 120B. In comparison, POGWY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SNPMF is priced at $0.66, while POGWY trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas POGWY's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, SNPMF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to POGWY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SNPMF is more volatile compared to POGWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNPMF.Check POGWY's competition here
SNPMF vs VCOGF Comparison February 2026
SNPMF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNPMF stands at 120B. In comparison, VCOGF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SNPMF is priced at $0.66, while VCOGF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas VCOGF's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, SNPMF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VCOGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SNPMF is more volatile compared to VCOGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNPMF.Check VCOGF's competition here