SnowWorld N.V.
SnowWorld N.V. (SNOW.AS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SNOW.AS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Leisure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNOW.AS | €10.60 | +0.95% | 41.8M | -3.85 | -€2.75 | N/A |
| BFIT.AS | €29.80 | +2.76% | 1.9B | 133.82 | €0.22 | N/A |
| CDA.PA | €24.40 | +4.05% | 1.2B | 11.29 | €2.09 | +4.66% |
| BEN.PA | €6.96 | +2.81% | 542.4M | -24.98 | -€0.27 | +3.26% |
| OLG.PA | €2.08 | -2.35% | 361.7M | -4.24 | -€0.49 | N/A |
| MLCMB.PA | €250.00 | -6.02% | 239.5M | 12.38 | €21.49 | +3.20% |
| ALRFG.PA | €4.42 | -2.64% | 122.8M | 22.50 | €0.20 | +2.00% |
| ALPDX.PA | €11.80 | -0.84% | 105.9M | 17.88 | €0.66 | +5.59% |
| SMAR.BR | €26.40 | +0.00% | 91.8M | 19.13 | €1.38 | N/A |
| ABEO.PA | €8.10 | +2.27% | 66.7M | 7.75 | €1.04 | +4.09% |
Stock Comparison
SNOW.AS vs BFIT.AS Comparison April 2026
SNOW.AS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNOW.AS stands at 41.8M. In comparison, BFIT.AS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SNOW.AS is priced at €10.60, while BFIT.AS trades at €29.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNOW.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas BFIT.AS's P/E ratio is 133.82. In terms of profitability, SNOW.AS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to BFIT.AS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SNOW.AS is more volatile compared to BFIT.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNOW.AS.Check BFIT.AS's competition here
SNOW.AS vs CDA.PA Comparison April 2026
SNOW.AS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNOW.AS stands at 41.8M. In comparison, CDA.PA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SNOW.AS is priced at €10.60, while CDA.PA trades at €24.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNOW.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas CDA.PA's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, SNOW.AS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to CDA.PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SNOW.AS is more volatile compared to CDA.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNOW.AS.Check CDA.PA's competition here
SNOW.AS vs BEN.PA Comparison April 2026
SNOW.AS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNOW.AS stands at 41.8M. In comparison, BEN.PA has a market cap of 542.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SNOW.AS is priced at €10.60, while BEN.PA trades at €6.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNOW.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas BEN.PA's P/E ratio is -24.98. In terms of profitability, SNOW.AS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to BEN.PA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SNOW.AS is more volatile compared to BEN.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNOW.AS.Check BEN.PA's competition here
SNOW.AS vs OLG.PA Comparison April 2026
SNOW.AS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNOW.AS stands at 41.8M. In comparison, OLG.PA has a market cap of 361.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SNOW.AS is priced at €10.60, while OLG.PA trades at €2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNOW.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas OLG.PA's P/E ratio is -4.24. In terms of profitability, SNOW.AS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to OLG.PA's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SNOW.AS is more volatile compared to OLG.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNOW.AS.Check OLG.PA's competition here
SNOW.AS vs MLCMB.PA Comparison April 2026
SNOW.AS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNOW.AS stands at 41.8M. In comparison, MLCMB.PA has a market cap of 239.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SNOW.AS is priced at €10.60, while MLCMB.PA trades at €250.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNOW.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas MLCMB.PA's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, SNOW.AS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to MLCMB.PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SNOW.AS is more volatile compared to MLCMB.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNOW.AS.Check MLCMB.PA's competition here
SNOW.AS vs ALRFG.PA Comparison April 2026
SNOW.AS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNOW.AS stands at 41.8M. In comparison, ALRFG.PA has a market cap of 122.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SNOW.AS is priced at €10.60, while ALRFG.PA trades at €4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNOW.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas ALRFG.PA's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, SNOW.AS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to ALRFG.PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SNOW.AS is more volatile compared to ALRFG.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNOW.AS.Check ALRFG.PA's competition here
SNOW.AS vs ALPDX.PA Comparison April 2026
SNOW.AS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNOW.AS stands at 41.8M. In comparison, ALPDX.PA has a market cap of 105.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SNOW.AS is priced at €10.60, while ALPDX.PA trades at €11.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNOW.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas ALPDX.PA's P/E ratio is 17.88. In terms of profitability, SNOW.AS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to ALPDX.PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SNOW.AS is more volatile compared to ALPDX.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNOW.AS.Check ALPDX.PA's competition here
SNOW.AS vs SMAR.BR Comparison April 2026
SNOW.AS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNOW.AS stands at 41.8M. In comparison, SMAR.BR has a market cap of 91.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SNOW.AS is priced at €10.60, while SMAR.BR trades at €26.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNOW.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas SMAR.BR's P/E ratio is 19.13. In terms of profitability, SNOW.AS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to SMAR.BR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SNOW.AS is more volatile compared to SMAR.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNOW.AS.Check SMAR.BR's competition here
SNOW.AS vs ABEO.PA Comparison April 2026
SNOW.AS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNOW.AS stands at 41.8M. In comparison, ABEO.PA has a market cap of 66.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SNOW.AS is priced at €10.60, while ABEO.PA trades at €8.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNOW.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas ABEO.PA's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, SNOW.AS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to ABEO.PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SNOW.AS is more volatile compared to ABEO.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNOW.AS.Check ABEO.PA's competition here
SNOW.AS vs ALMND.PA Comparison April 2026
SNOW.AS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNOW.AS stands at 41.8M. In comparison, ALMND.PA has a market cap of 63.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SNOW.AS is priced at €10.60, while ALMND.PA trades at €0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNOW.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas ALMND.PA's P/E ratio is 0.59. In terms of profitability, SNOW.AS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to ALMND.PA's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SNOW.AS is more volatile compared to ALMND.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNOW.AS.Check ALMND.PA's competition here
SNOW.AS vs MLIFS.PA Comparison April 2026
SNOW.AS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNOW.AS stands at 41.8M. In comparison, MLIFS.PA has a market cap of 56.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SNOW.AS is priced at €10.60, while MLIFS.PA trades at €7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNOW.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas MLIFS.PA's P/E ratio is -700.00. In terms of profitability, SNOW.AS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to MLIFS.PA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SNOW.AS is more volatile compared to MLIFS.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNOW.AS.Check MLIFS.PA's competition here
SNOW.AS vs ALLEX.PA Comparison April 2026
SNOW.AS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNOW.AS stands at 41.8M. In comparison, ALLEX.PA has a market cap of 38.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SNOW.AS is priced at €10.60, while ALLEX.PA trades at €5.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNOW.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas ALLEX.PA's P/E ratio is 5.58. In terms of profitability, SNOW.AS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to ALLEX.PA's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SNOW.AS is less volatile compared to ALLEX.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNOW.AS.Check ALLEX.PA's competition here
SNOW.AS vs ALCYB.PA Comparison April 2026
SNOW.AS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNOW.AS stands at 41.8M. In comparison, ALCYB.PA has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SNOW.AS is priced at €10.60, while ALCYB.PA trades at €0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNOW.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas ALCYB.PA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SNOW.AS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to ALCYB.PA's ROE of -5.84%. Regarding short-term risk, SNOW.AS is less volatile compared to ALCYB.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNOW.AS.Check ALCYB.PA's competition here
SNOW.AS vs GREV.PA Comparison April 2026
SNOW.AS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNOW.AS stands at 41.8M. In comparison, GREV.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SNOW.AS is priced at €10.60, while GREV.PA trades at €66.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNOW.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas GREV.PA's P/E ratio is -8.74. In terms of profitability, SNOW.AS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to GREV.PA's ROE of -49.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SNOW.AS is more volatile compared to GREV.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNOW.AS.Check GREV.PA's competition here
SNOW.AS vs CYBBT.PA Comparison April 2026
SNOW.AS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNOW.AS stands at 41.8M. In comparison, CYBBT.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SNOW.AS is priced at €10.60, while CYBBT.PA trades at €0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNOW.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas CYBBT.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNOW.AS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to CYBBT.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SNOW.AS is more volatile compared to CYBBT.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNOW.AS.Check CYBBT.PA's competition here
SNOW.AS vs ACCEL.AS Comparison April 2026
SNOW.AS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNOW.AS stands at 41.8M. In comparison, ACCEL.AS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SNOW.AS is priced at €10.60, while ACCEL.AS trades at €57.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNOW.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.85, whereas ACCEL.AS's P/E ratio is 22.13. In terms of profitability, SNOW.AS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to ACCEL.AS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SNOW.AS is more volatile compared to ACCEL.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNOW.AS.Check ACCEL.AS's competition here