Snipp Interactive Inc.
Snipp Interactive Inc. (SNIPF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SNIPF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Advertising Agencies Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNIPF | $0.05 | -4.26% | 12.9M | -4.50 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| PGPEF | $109.96 | +0.00% | 27.6B | 13.87 | $7.93 | +3.61% |
| PUBGY | $22.90 | -3.09% | 23B | 11.58 | $1.98 | +3.30% |
| WPPGF | $5.88 | +3.74% | 6.3B | 8.78 | $0.67 | +8.57% |
| DNTUF | $22.79 | +17.66% | 5.9B | -4.56 | -$5.00 | +3.96% |
| DNTUY | $20.03 | -1.18% | 5.3B | -4.08 | -$4.96 | +3.22% |
| CYGIY | $5.25 | +0.00% | 5.3B | 37.50 | $0.14 | N/A |
| CYAGF | $8.08 | +0.00% | 4.1B | 27.86 | $0.29 | +1.39% |
| JCDXY | $8.87 | +0.00% | 3.8B | 12.49 | $0.71 | +3.51% |
| JCDXF | $17.25 | +0.00% | 3.7B | 12.15 | $1.42 | +3.59% |
Stock Comparison
SNIPF vs PGPEF Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, PGPEF has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while PGPEF trades at $109.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas PGPEF's P/E ratio is 13.87. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PGPEF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and PGPEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PGPEF's competition here
SNIPF vs PUBGY Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, PUBGY has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while PUBGY trades at $22.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas PUBGY's P/E ratio is 11.58. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PUBGY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to PUBGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.Check PUBGY's competition here
SNIPF vs WPPGF Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, WPPGF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while WPPGF trades at $5.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas WPPGF's P/E ratio is 8.78. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to WPPGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and WPPGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WPPGF's competition here
SNIPF vs DNTUF Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, DNTUF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while DNTUF trades at $22.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas DNTUF's P/E ratio is -4.56. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DNTUF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and DNTUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DNTUF's competition here
SNIPF vs DNTUY Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, DNTUY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while DNTUY trades at $20.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas DNTUY's P/E ratio is -4.08. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DNTUY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to DNTUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.Check DNTUY's competition here
SNIPF vs CYGIY Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, CYGIY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while CYGIY trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas CYGIY's P/E ratio is 37.50. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CYGIY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to CYGIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.Check CYGIY's competition here
SNIPF vs CYAGF Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, CYAGF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while CYAGF trades at $8.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas CYAGF's P/E ratio is 27.86. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CYAGF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to CYAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.Check CYAGF's competition here
SNIPF vs JCDXY Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, JCDXY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while JCDXY trades at $8.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas JCDXY's P/E ratio is 12.49. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to JCDXY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and JCDXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JCDXY's competition here
SNIPF vs JCDXF Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, JCDXF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while JCDXF trades at $17.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas JCDXF's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to JCDXF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and JCDXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JCDXF's competition here
SNIPF vs SOTDF Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, SOTDF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while SOTDF trades at $60.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas SOTDF's P/E ratio is 20.84. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SOTDF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and SOTDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SOTDF's competition here
SNIPF vs HKUOY Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, HKUOY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while HKUOY trades at $15.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas HKUOY's P/E ratio is 39.92. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HKUOY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to HKUOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.Check HKUOY's competition here
SNIPF vs HKUOF Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, HKUOF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while HKUOF trades at $7.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas HKUOF's P/E ratio is 35.10. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HKUOF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to HKUOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.Check HKUOF's competition here
SNIPF vs AIAPF Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, AIAPF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while AIAPF trades at $7.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas AIAPF's P/E ratio is 45.88. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AIAPF's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to AIAPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.Check AIAPF's competition here
SNIPF vs FRRFF Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, FRRFF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while FRRFF trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas FRRFF's P/E ratio is 10.12. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FRRFF's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to FRRFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.Check FRRFF's competition here
SNIPF vs YUGVF Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, YUGVF has a market cap of 527M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while YUGVF trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas YUGVF's P/E ratio is 450.00. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to YUGVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to YUGVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.Check YUGVF's competition here
SNIPF vs SPIDY Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, SPIDY has a market cap of 441.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while SPIDY trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas SPIDY's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SPIDY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and SPIDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SPIDY's competition here
SNIPF vs NXFNF Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, NXFNF has a market cap of 437.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while NXFNF trades at $4.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas NXFNF's P/E ratio is 8.51. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NXFNF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to NXFNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.Check NXFNF's competition here
SNIPF vs MCCLF Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, MCCLF has a market cap of 322.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while MCCLF trades at $8.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas MCCLF's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MCCLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and MCCLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MCCLF's competition here
SNIPF vs TTTPF Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, TTTPF has a market cap of 282.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while TTTPF trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas TTTPF's P/E ratio is 45.22. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TTTPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to TTTPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.Check TTTPF's competition here
SNIPF vs PROM Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, PROM has a market cap of 237.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while PROM trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas PROM's P/E ratio is 2.07. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PROM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and PROM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PROM's competition here
SNIPF vs PTMEY Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, PTMEY has a market cap of 211.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while PTMEY trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas PTMEY's P/E ratio is 3.56. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PTMEY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and PTMEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PTMEY's competition here
SNIPF vs SCPPF Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, SCPPF has a market cap of 195.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while SCPPF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas SCPPF's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SCPPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to SCPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.Check SCPPF's competition here
SNIPF vs CNFN Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, CNFN has a market cap of 184.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while CNFN trades at $2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas CNFN's P/E ratio is -27.87. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CNFN's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to CNFN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.Check CNFN's competition here
SNIPF vs KLTI Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, KLTI has a market cap of 148.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while KLTI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas KLTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to KLTI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and KLTI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KLTI's competition here
SNIPF vs VCCLF Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, VCCLF has a market cap of 141.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while VCCLF trades at $6.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas VCCLF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to VCCLF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to VCCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.Check VCCLF's competition here
SNIPF vs PCOFF Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, PCOFF has a market cap of 126.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while PCOFF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas PCOFF's P/E ratio is 2.50. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PCOFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to PCOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.Check PCOFF's competition here
SNIPF vs OPESF Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, OPESF has a market cap of 86.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while OPESF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas OPESF's P/E ratio is -5.53. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to OPESF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to OPESF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.Check OPESF's competition here
SNIPF vs GTNLF Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, GTNLF has a market cap of 74.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while GTNLF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas GTNLF's P/E ratio is 37.00. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GTNLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and GTNLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GTNLF's competition here
SNIPF vs CAUUF Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, CAUUF has a market cap of 63.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while CAUUF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas CAUUF's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CAUUF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to CAUUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.Check CAUUF's competition here
SNIPF vs NHLPF Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, NHLPF has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while NHLPF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas NHLPF's P/E ratio is 32.67. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NHLPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to NHLPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.Check NHLPF's competition here
SNIPF vs EZOO Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, EZOO has a market cap of 29.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while EZOO trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas EZOO's P/E ratio is -24.70. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to EZOO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to EZOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.Check EZOO's competition here
SNIPF vs IFUS Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, IFUS has a market cap of 25.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while IFUS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas IFUS's P/E ratio is -3.74. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to IFUS's ROE of +2.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to IFUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.Check IFUS's competition here
SNIPF vs ACHN Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, ACHN has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while ACHN trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas ACHN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ACHN's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to ACHN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.Check ACHN's competition here
SNIPF vs GMGZ Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, GMGZ has a market cap of 21M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while GMGZ trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas GMGZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GMGZ's ROE of -30.97%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and GMGZ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GMGZ's competition here
SNIPF vs AATV Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, AATV has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while AATV trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas AATV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AATV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to AATV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.Check AATV's competition here
SNIPF vs INEOF Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, INEOF has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while INEOF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas INEOF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to INEOF's ROE of +2.87%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to INEOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.Check INEOF's competition here
SNIPF vs TGNT Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, TGNT has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while TGNT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas TGNT's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TGNT's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to TGNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.Check TGNT's competition here
SNIPF vs UCPA Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, UCPA has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while UCPA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas UCPA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to UCPA's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to UCPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.Check UCPA's competition here
SNIPF vs SPTY Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, SPTY has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while SPTY trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas SPTY's P/E ratio is -5.35. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SPTY's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and SPTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SPTY's competition here
SNIPF vs VYBE Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, VYBE has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while VYBE trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas VYBE's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to VYBE's ROE of +3.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and VYBE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VYBE's competition here
SNIPF vs MMDDF Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, MMDDF has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while MMDDF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas MMDDF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MMDDF's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and MMDDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MMDDF's competition here
SNIPF vs CMGR Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, CMGR has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while CMGR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas CMGR's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CMGR's ROE of +241.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and CMGR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CMGR's competition here
SNIPF vs DBMM Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, DBMM has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while DBMM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas DBMM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DBMM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to DBMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.Check DBMM's competition here
SNIPF vs FBOP Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, FBOP has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while FBOP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas FBOP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FBOP's ROE of -4.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to FBOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.Check FBOP's competition here
SNIPF vs MMND Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, MMND has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while MMND trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas MMND's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MMND's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to MMND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.Check MMND's competition here
SNIPF vs CEENF Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, CEENF has a market cap of 985.9K. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while CEENF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas CEENF's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CEENF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and CEENF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CEENF's competition here
SNIPF vs ATXMF Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, ATXMF has a market cap of 963.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while ATXMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas ATXMF's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ATXMF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to ATXMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.Check ATXMF's competition here
SNIPF vs BYOC Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, BYOC has a market cap of 820K. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while BYOC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas BYOC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BYOC's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to BYOC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.Check BYOC's competition here
SNIPF vs LIGA Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, LIGA has a market cap of 674.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while LIGA trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas LIGA's P/E ratio is 1.66. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LIGA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to LIGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.Check LIGA's competition here
SNIPF vs PVSP Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, PVSP has a market cap of 566.7K. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while PVSP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas PVSP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PVSP's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to PVSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.Check PVSP's competition here
SNIPF vs DMSL Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, DMSL has a market cap of 484.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while DMSL trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas DMSL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DMSL's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to DMSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.Check DMSL's competition here
SNIPF vs GOOLF Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, GOOLF has a market cap of 342.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while GOOLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas GOOLF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GOOLF's ROE of +3.96%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to GOOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.Check GOOLF's competition here
SNIPF vs CMGO Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, CMGO has a market cap of 307.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while CMGO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas CMGO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CMGO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and CMGO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CMGO's competition here
SNIPF vs CYPXF Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, CYPXF has a market cap of 174K. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while CYPXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas CYPXF's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CYPXF's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to CYPXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.Check CYPXF's competition here
SNIPF vs WWIO Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, WWIO has a market cap of 139K. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while WWIO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas WWIO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to WWIO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to WWIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.Check WWIO's competition here
SNIPF vs ACTL Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, ACTL has a market cap of 76.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while ACTL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas ACTL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ACTL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to ACTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.Check ACTL's competition here
SNIPF vs GBXI Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, GBXI has a market cap of 59.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while GBXI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas GBXI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GBXI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and GBXI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GBXI's competition here
SNIPF vs NWCN Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, NWCN has a market cap of 50.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while NWCN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas NWCN's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NWCN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to NWCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.Check NWCN's competition here
SNIPF vs NXMR Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, NXMR has a market cap of 37.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while NXMR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas NXMR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NXMR's ROE of -3.86%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and NXMR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NXMR's competition here
SNIPF vs TRBO Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, TRBO has a market cap of 34.9K. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while TRBO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas TRBO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TRBO's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and TRBO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TRBO's competition here
SNIPF vs SNPW Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, SNPW has a market cap of 28.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while SNPW trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas SNPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SNPW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and SNPW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SNPW's competition here
SNIPF vs ITKH Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, ITKH has a market cap of 23.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while ITKH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas ITKH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ITKH's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and ITKH have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ITKH's competition here
SNIPF vs PRKI Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, PRKI has a market cap of 22.7K. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while PRKI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas PRKI's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PRKI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and PRKI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PRKI's competition here
SNIPF vs NBDR Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, NBDR has a market cap of 21K. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while NBDR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas NBDR's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NBDR's ROE of -4.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and NBDR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NBDR's competition here
SNIPF vs EPGC Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, EPGC has a market cap of 18.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while EPGC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas EPGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to EPGC's ROE of +10.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to EPGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.Check EPGC's competition here
SNIPF vs RFII Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, RFII has a market cap of 15.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while RFII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas RFII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RFII's ROE of -1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and RFII have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RFII's competition here
SNIPF vs PSYC Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, PSYC has a market cap of 8.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while PSYC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas PSYC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PSYC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to PSYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.Check PSYC's competition here
SNIPF vs CYGT Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, CYGT has a market cap of 8.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while CYGT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas CYGT's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CYGT's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and CYGT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CYGT's competition here
SNIPF vs BWAV Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, BWAV has a market cap of 7K. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while BWAV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas BWAV's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BWAV's ROE of -3.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to BWAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.Check BWAV's competition here
SNIPF vs ISML Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, ISML has a market cap of 4.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while ISML trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas ISML's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ISML's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and ISML have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ISML's competition here
SNIPF vs WGEE Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, WGEE has a market cap of 3.9K. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while WGEE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas WGEE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to WGEE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to WGEE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.Check WGEE's competition here
SNIPF vs BXNG Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, BXNG has a market cap of 2.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while BXNG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas BXNG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BXNG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and BXNG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BXNG's competition here
SNIPF vs GTRL Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, GTRL has a market cap of 230. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while GTRL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas GTRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GTRL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and GTRL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GTRL's competition here
SNIPF vs ADST Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, ADST has a market cap of 204. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while ADST trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas ADST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ADST's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to ADST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.Check ADST's competition here
SNIPF vs LOGX Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, LOGX has a market cap of 68. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while LOGX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas LOGX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LOGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and LOGX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LOGX's competition here
SNIPF vs VPSN Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, VPSN has a market cap of 1. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while VPSN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas VPSN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to VPSN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to VPSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.Check VPSN's competition here
SNIPF vs MYRY Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, MYRY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while MYRY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas MYRY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MYRY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and MYRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MYRY's competition here
SNIPF vs ADTY Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, ADTY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while ADTY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas ADTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ADTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and ADTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ADTY's competition here
SNIPF vs ZULU Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, ZULU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while ZULU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas ZULU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ZULU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and ZULU have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZULU's competition here
SNIPF vs LTMP Comparison July 2025
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 12.9M. In comparison, LTMP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.05, while LTMP trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas LTMP's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LTMP's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to LTMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.Check LTMP's competition here