Snipp Interactive Inc.
Snipp Interactive Inc. SNIPF Peers
See (SNIPF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Advertising Agencies Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNIPF | $0.06 | -3.33% | 16.59M | -5.80 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| PUBGY | $27.23 | -0.06% | 27.31B | 14.72 | $1.85 | +2.98% |
| PGPEF | $107.00 | N/A | 26.83B | 14.60 | $7.33 | N/A |
| WPPGF | $8.07 | -3.70% | 8.71B | 12.23 | $0.66 | +6.29% |
| DNTUY | $21.49 | -0.61% | 5.62B | -4.25 | -$5.05 | +2.99% |
| HKUOY | $14.66 | -2.40% | 5.39B | 11.28 | $1.30 | N/A |
| DNTUF | $19.31 | N/A | 5.01B | -3.82 | -$5.05 | +2.26% |
| CYGIY | $4.81 | N/A | 4.87B | 32.07 | $0.15 | N/A |
| CYAGF | $8.08 | +0.00% | 4.09B | 27.86 | $0.29 | +1.39% |
| JCDXF | $17.40 | N/A | 3.72B | 12.79 | $1.36 | +3.55% |
Stock Comparison
SNIPF vs PUBGY Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, PUBGY has a market cap of 27.31B. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while PUBGY trades at $27.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas PUBGY's P/E ratio is 14.72. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to PUBGY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to PUBGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.
SNIPF vs PGPEF Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, PGPEF has a market cap of 26.83B. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while PGPEF trades at $107.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas PGPEF's P/E ratio is 14.60. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to PGPEF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to PGPEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.
SNIPF vs WPPGF Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, WPPGF has a market cap of 8.71B. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while WPPGF trades at $8.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas WPPGF's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to WPPGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to WPPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.
SNIPF vs DNTUY Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, DNTUY has a market cap of 5.62B. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while DNTUY trades at $21.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas DNTUY's P/E ratio is -4.25. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to DNTUY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to DNTUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.
SNIPF vs HKUOY Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, HKUOY has a market cap of 5.39B. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while HKUOY trades at $14.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas HKUOY's P/E ratio is 11.28. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to HKUOY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to HKUOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.
SNIPF vs DNTUF Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, DNTUF has a market cap of 5.01B. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while DNTUF trades at $19.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas DNTUF's P/E ratio is -3.82. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to DNTUF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to DNTUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.
SNIPF vs CYGIY Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, CYGIY has a market cap of 4.87B. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while CYGIY trades at $4.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas CYGIY's P/E ratio is 32.07. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to CYGIY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to CYGIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.
SNIPF vs CYAGF Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, CYAGF has a market cap of 4.09B. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while CYAGF trades at $8.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas CYAGF's P/E ratio is 27.86. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to CYAGF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to CYAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.
SNIPF vs JCDXF Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, JCDXF has a market cap of 3.72B. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while JCDXF trades at $17.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas JCDXF's P/E ratio is 12.79. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to JCDXF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to JCDXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.
SNIPF vs JCDXY Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, JCDXY has a market cap of 3.39B. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while JCDXY trades at $7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas JCDXY's P/E ratio is 11.66. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to JCDXY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and JCDXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SNIPF vs HKUOF Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, HKUOF has a market cap of 3.08B. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while HKUOF trades at $8.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas HKUOF's P/E ratio is 12.68. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to HKUOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and HKUOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SNIPF vs SOTDF Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, SOTDF has a market cap of 2.77B. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while SOTDF trades at $49.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas SOTDF's P/E ratio is 18.93. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SOTDF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to SOTDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.
SNIPF vs AIAPF Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, AIAPF has a market cap of 1.53B. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while AIAPF trades at $7.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas AIAPF's P/E ratio is 45.88. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to AIAPF's ROE of +1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to AIAPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.
SNIPF vs FRRFF Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, FRRFF has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while FRRFF trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas FRRFF's P/E ratio is 10.12. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to FRRFF's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to FRRFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.
SNIPF vs SPIDY Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, SPIDY has a market cap of 487.81M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while SPIDY trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas SPIDY's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SPIDY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and SPIDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SNIPF vs YUGVF Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, YUGVF has a market cap of 487.04M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while YUGVF trades at $4.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas YUGVF's P/E ratio is 416.00. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to YUGVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to YUGVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.
SNIPF vs NXFNF Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, NXFNF has a market cap of 437.81M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while NXFNF trades at $4.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas NXFNF's P/E ratio is 8.51. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to NXFNF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to NXFNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.
SNIPF vs MCCLF Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, MCCLF has a market cap of 322.25M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while MCCLF trades at $8.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas MCCLF's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to MCCLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and MCCLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SNIPF vs TTTPF Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, TTTPF has a market cap of 282.56M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while TTTPF trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas TTTPF's P/E ratio is 45.22. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to TTTPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to TTTPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.
SNIPF vs PTMEY Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, PTMEY has a market cap of 276.45M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while PTMEY trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas PTMEY's P/E ratio is 4.35. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to PTMEY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to PTMEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.
SNIPF vs PROM Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, PROM has a market cap of 237.51M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while PROM trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas PROM's P/E ratio is 2.07. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to PROM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and PROM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SNIPF vs SCPPF Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, SCPPF has a market cap of 221.15M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while SCPPF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas SCPPF's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SCPPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to SCPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.
SNIPF vs KLTI Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, KLTI has a market cap of 148.22M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while KLTI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas KLTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to KLTI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and KLTI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SNIPF vs VCCLF Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, VCCLF has a market cap of 140.98M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while VCCLF trades at $6.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas VCCLF's P/E ratio is 7.08. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to VCCLF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to VCCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.
SNIPF vs PCOFF Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, PCOFF has a market cap of 125.14M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while PCOFF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas PCOFF's P/E ratio is 2.50. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to PCOFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to PCOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.
SNIPF vs EDHL Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, EDHL has a market cap of 111.03M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while EDHL trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas EDHL's P/E ratio is 419.00. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to EDHL's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to EDHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.
SNIPF vs GTNLF Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, GTNLF has a market cap of 74.68M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while GTNLF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas GTNLF's P/E ratio is 37.00. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to GTNLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and GTNLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SNIPF vs CAUUF Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, CAUUF has a market cap of 65.08M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while CAUUF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas CAUUF's P/E ratio is 11.04. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to CAUUF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and CAUUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SNIPF vs OPESF Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, OPESF has a market cap of 54.93M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while OPESF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas OPESF's P/E ratio is -3.53. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to OPESF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to OPESF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.
SNIPF vs CYPXF Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, CYPXF has a market cap of 52.75M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while CYPXF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas CYPXF's P/E ratio is -18.95. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to CYPXF's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to CYPXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.
SNIPF vs GMGZ Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, GMGZ has a market cap of 34.04M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while GMGZ trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas GMGZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to GMGZ's ROE of -30.97%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to GMGZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.
SNIPF vs NHLPF Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, NHLPF has a market cap of 31.33M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while NHLPF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas NHLPF's P/E ratio is 32.67. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to NHLPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to NHLPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.
SNIPF vs EZOO Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, EZOO has a market cap of 29.63M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while EZOO trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas EZOO's P/E ratio is -24.70. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to EZOO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to EZOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.
SNIPF vs IFUS Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, IFUS has a market cap of 27.47M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while IFUS trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas IFUS's P/E ratio is -4.08. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to IFUS's ROE of +2.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to IFUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.
SNIPF vs CNFN Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, CNFN has a market cap of 24.84M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while CNFN trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas CNFN's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to CNFN's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to CNFN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.
SNIPF vs ACHN Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, ACHN has a market cap of 23.73M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while ACHN trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas ACHN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ACHN's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to ACHN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.
SNIPF vs SPTY Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, SPTY has a market cap of 8.17M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while SPTY trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas SPTY's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SPTY's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to SPTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.
SNIPF vs AATV Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, AATV has a market cap of 7.68M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while AATV trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas AATV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to AATV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to AATV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.
SNIPF vs TGNT Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, TGNT has a market cap of 6.97M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while TGNT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas TGNT's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to TGNT's ROE of +1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to TGNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.
SNIPF vs INEOF Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, INEOF has a market cap of 5.56M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while INEOF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas INEOF's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to INEOF's ROE of +2.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and INEOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SNIPF vs UCPA Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, UCPA has a market cap of 4.59M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while UCPA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas UCPA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to UCPA's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to UCPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.
SNIPF vs VYBE Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, VYBE has a market cap of 3.55M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while VYBE trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas VYBE's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to VYBE's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and VYBE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SNIPF vs MMDDF Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, MMDDF has a market cap of 1.65M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while MMDDF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas MMDDF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to MMDDF's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and MMDDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SNIPF vs BYOC Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, BYOC has a market cap of 1.64M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while BYOC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas BYOC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to BYOC's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and BYOC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SNIPF vs CMGR Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, CMGR has a market cap of 1.64M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while CMGR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas CMGR's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to CMGR's ROE of +241.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and CMGR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SNIPF vs DBMM Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, DBMM has a market cap of 1.38M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while DBMM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas DBMM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to DBMM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to DBMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.
SNIPF vs FBOP Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, FBOP has a market cap of 1.17M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while FBOP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas FBOP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to FBOP's ROE of -4.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to FBOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.
SNIPF vs MMND Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, MMND has a market cap of 1.03M. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while MMND trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas MMND's P/E ratio is 2.99. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to MMND's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and MMND have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SNIPF vs CEENF Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, CEENF has a market cap of 985860.00. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while CEENF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas CEENF's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to CEENF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and CEENF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SNIPF vs PVSP Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, PVSP has a market cap of 944503.00. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while PVSP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas PVSP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to PVSP's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to PVSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.
SNIPF vs LIGA Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, LIGA has a market cap of 687791.00. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while LIGA trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas LIGA's P/E ratio is 1.69. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to LIGA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and LIGA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SNIPF vs CMGO Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, CMGO has a market cap of 526406.00. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while CMGO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas CMGO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to CMGO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and CMGO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SNIPF vs DMSL Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, DMSL has a market cap of 484189.00. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while DMSL trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas DMSL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to DMSL's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to DMSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.
SNIPF vs SNPW Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, SNPW has a market cap of 392627.00. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while SNPW trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas SNPW's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SNPW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to SNPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.
SNIPF vs GOOLF Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, GOOLF has a market cap of 339833.00. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while GOOLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas GOOLF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to GOOLF's ROE of +3.96%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to GOOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.
SNIPF vs ATXMF Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, ATXMF has a market cap of 271460.00. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while ATXMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas ATXMF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ATXMF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and ATXMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SNIPF vs WWIO Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, WWIO has a market cap of 138998.00. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while WWIO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas WWIO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to WWIO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to WWIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.
SNIPF vs ACTL Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, ACTL has a market cap of 76834.00. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while ACTL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas ACTL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ACTL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to ACTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.
SNIPF vs NXMR Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, NXMR has a market cap of 37413.00. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while NXMR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas NXMR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to NXMR's ROE of -3.86%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and NXMR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SNIPF vs TRBO Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, TRBO has a market cap of 34888.00. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while TRBO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas TRBO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to TRBO's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and TRBO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SNIPF vs ITKH Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, ITKH has a market cap of 23315.00. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while ITKH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas ITKH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ITKH's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and ITKH have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SNIPF vs PRKI Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, PRKI has a market cap of 22720.00. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while PRKI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas PRKI's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to PRKI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and PRKI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SNIPF vs NBDR Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, NBDR has a market cap of 20969.00. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while NBDR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas NBDR's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to NBDR's ROE of -4.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and NBDR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SNIPF vs EPGC Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, EPGC has a market cap of 18377.00. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while EPGC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas EPGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to EPGC's ROE of +10.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to EPGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.
SNIPF vs PSYC Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, PSYC has a market cap of 17080.00. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while PSYC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas PSYC's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to PSYC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to PSYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.
SNIPF vs RFII Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, RFII has a market cap of 15108.00. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while RFII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas RFII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to RFII's ROE of -1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to RFII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.
SNIPF vs GBXI Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, GBXI has a market cap of 14086.00. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while GBXI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas GBXI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to GBXI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and GBXI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SNIPF vs NWCN Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, NWCN has a market cap of 12544.00. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while NWCN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas NWCN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to NWCN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to NWCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.
SNIPF vs CYGT Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, CYGT has a market cap of 8450.00. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while CYGT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas CYGT's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to CYGT's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and CYGT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SNIPF vs ISML Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, ISML has a market cap of 4260.00. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while ISML trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas ISML's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ISML's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and ISML have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SNIPF vs WGEE Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, WGEE has a market cap of 3864.00. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while WGEE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas WGEE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to WGEE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to WGEE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.
SNIPF vs GTRL Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, GTRL has a market cap of 3456.00. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while GTRL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas GTRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to GTRL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to GTRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.
SNIPF vs BXNG Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, BXNG has a market cap of 2361.00. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while BXNG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas BXNG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to BXNG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and BXNG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SNIPF vs BWAV Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, BWAV has a market cap of 585.00. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while BWAV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas BWAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to BWAV's ROE of -3.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to BWAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.
SNIPF vs ADST Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, ADST has a market cap of 204.00. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while ADST trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas ADST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ADST's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to ADST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.
SNIPF vs LOGX Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, LOGX has a market cap of 68.00. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while LOGX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas LOGX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to LOGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and LOGX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SNIPF vs VPSN Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, VPSN has a market cap of 1.00. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while VPSN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas VPSN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to VPSN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to VPSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.
SNIPF vs ADTY Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, ADTY has a market cap of N/A. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while ADTY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas ADTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ADTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and ADTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SNIPF vs MYRY Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, MYRY has a market cap of N/A. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while MYRY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas MYRY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to MYRY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF and MYRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SNIPF vs LTMP Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, LTMP has a market cap of N/A. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while LTMP trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas LTMP's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to LTMP's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to LTMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.
SNIPF vs ZULU Comparison
SNIPF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNIPF stands at 16.59M. In comparison, ZULU has a market cap of N/A. Regarding current trading prices, SNIPF is priced at $0.06, while ZULU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNIPF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas ZULU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNIPF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ZULU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SNIPF is less volatile compared to ZULU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNIPF.