Sonagi, S.G.P.S., S.A.
Sonagi, S.G.P.S., S.A. (SNG.LS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SNG.LS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNG.LS | €1.17 | +0.00% | 11.7M | -7.31 | -€0.16 | N/A |
| SHUR.BR | €34.85 | -1.13% | 3.5B | 8.48 | €4.11 | +2.83% |
| VGP.BR | €92.60 | -0.32% | 2.5B | 8.80 | €10.52 | +3.55% |
| ATRS.AS | €3.00 | +0.00% | 1.2B | -18.75 | -€0.16 | N/A |
| ORIA.PA | €169.00 | +0.00% | 408M | 13.61 | €12.42 | +2.13% |
| INCLU.BR | €17.10 | +0.59% | 130.3M | 6.53 | €2.62 | +4.82% |
| TEXF.BR | €34.20 | -0.58% | 125.4M | 16.85 | €2.03 | +5.11% |
| CROS.PA | €10.80 | +0.00% | 114.8M | 21.18 | €0.51 | N/A |
| SPEL.PA | €9.90 | +0.00% | 104.4M | 15.47 | €0.64 | N/A |
| MLVIN.PA | €4.60 | +0.00% | 91M | 65.71 | €0.07 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SNG.LS vs SHUR.BR Comparison July 2025
SNG.LS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNG.LS stands at 11.7M. In comparison, SHUR.BR has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SNG.LS is priced at €1.17, while SHUR.BR trades at €34.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNG.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.31, whereas SHUR.BR's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, SNG.LS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SHUR.BR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SNG.LS is more volatile compared to SHUR.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNG.LS.Check SHUR.BR's competition here
SNG.LS vs VGP.BR Comparison July 2025
SNG.LS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNG.LS stands at 11.7M. In comparison, VGP.BR has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SNG.LS is priced at €1.17, while VGP.BR trades at €92.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNG.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.31, whereas VGP.BR's P/E ratio is 8.80. In terms of profitability, SNG.LS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to VGP.BR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SNG.LS is more volatile compared to VGP.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNG.LS.Check VGP.BR's competition here
SNG.LS vs ATRS.AS Comparison July 2025
SNG.LS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNG.LS stands at 11.7M. In comparison, ATRS.AS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SNG.LS is priced at €1.17, while ATRS.AS trades at €3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNG.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.31, whereas ATRS.AS's P/E ratio is -18.75. In terms of profitability, SNG.LS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ATRS.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SNG.LS is less volatile compared to ATRS.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNG.LS.Check ATRS.AS's competition here
SNG.LS vs ORIA.PA Comparison July 2025
SNG.LS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNG.LS stands at 11.7M. In comparison, ORIA.PA has a market cap of 408M. Regarding current trading prices, SNG.LS is priced at €1.17, while ORIA.PA trades at €169.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNG.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.31, whereas ORIA.PA's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, SNG.LS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ORIA.PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SNG.LS is more volatile compared to ORIA.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNG.LS.Check ORIA.PA's competition here
SNG.LS vs INCLU.BR Comparison July 2025
SNG.LS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNG.LS stands at 11.7M. In comparison, INCLU.BR has a market cap of 130.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SNG.LS is priced at €1.17, while INCLU.BR trades at €17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNG.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.31, whereas INCLU.BR's P/E ratio is 6.53. In terms of profitability, SNG.LS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to INCLU.BR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SNG.LS is more volatile compared to INCLU.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNG.LS.Check INCLU.BR's competition here
SNG.LS vs TEXF.BR Comparison July 2025
SNG.LS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNG.LS stands at 11.7M. In comparison, TEXF.BR has a market cap of 125.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SNG.LS is priced at €1.17, while TEXF.BR trades at €34.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNG.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.31, whereas TEXF.BR's P/E ratio is 16.85. In terms of profitability, SNG.LS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to TEXF.BR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SNG.LS is less volatile compared to TEXF.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNG.LS.Check TEXF.BR's competition here
SNG.LS vs CROS.PA Comparison July 2025
SNG.LS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNG.LS stands at 11.7M. In comparison, CROS.PA has a market cap of 114.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SNG.LS is priced at €1.17, while CROS.PA trades at €10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNG.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.31, whereas CROS.PA's P/E ratio is 21.18. In terms of profitability, SNG.LS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CROS.PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SNG.LS is more volatile compared to CROS.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNG.LS.Check CROS.PA's competition here
SNG.LS vs SPEL.PA Comparison July 2025
SNG.LS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNG.LS stands at 11.7M. In comparison, SPEL.PA has a market cap of 104.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SNG.LS is priced at €1.17, while SPEL.PA trades at €9.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNG.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.31, whereas SPEL.PA's P/E ratio is 15.47. In terms of profitability, SNG.LS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SPEL.PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SNG.LS is more volatile compared to SPEL.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNG.LS.Check SPEL.PA's competition here
SNG.LS vs MLVIN.PA Comparison July 2025
SNG.LS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNG.LS stands at 11.7M. In comparison, MLVIN.PA has a market cap of 91M. Regarding current trading prices, SNG.LS is priced at €1.17, while MLVIN.PA trades at €4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNG.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.31, whereas MLVIN.PA's P/E ratio is 65.71. In terms of profitability, SNG.LS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to MLVIN.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SNG.LS is more volatile compared to MLVIN.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNG.LS.Check MLVIN.PA's competition here
SNG.LS vs MLPAP.PA Comparison July 2025
SNG.LS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNG.LS stands at 11.7M. In comparison, MLPAP.PA has a market cap of 65.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SNG.LS is priced at €1.17, while MLPAP.PA trades at €1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNG.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.31, whereas MLPAP.PA's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, SNG.LS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to MLPAP.PA's ROE of +1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SNG.LS is more volatile compared to MLPAP.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNG.LS.Check MLPAP.PA's competition here
SNG.LS vs ARTE.PA Comparison July 2025
SNG.LS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNG.LS stands at 11.7M. In comparison, ARTE.PA has a market cap of 58.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SNG.LS is priced at €1.17, while ARTE.PA trades at €12.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNG.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.31, whereas ARTE.PA's P/E ratio is -20.33. In terms of profitability, SNG.LS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ARTE.PA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SNG.LS is more volatile compared to ARTE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNG.LS.Check ARTE.PA's competition here
SNG.LS vs MLMAQ.PA Comparison July 2025
SNG.LS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNG.LS stands at 11.7M. In comparison, MLMAQ.PA has a market cap of 48.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SNG.LS is priced at €1.17, while MLMAQ.PA trades at €8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNG.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.31, whereas MLMAQ.PA's P/E ratio is 75.45. In terms of profitability, SNG.LS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to MLMAQ.PA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SNG.LS is more volatile compared to MLMAQ.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNG.LS.Check MLMAQ.PA's competition here
SNG.LS vs BEVER.AS Comparison July 2025
SNG.LS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNG.LS stands at 11.7M. In comparison, BEVER.AS has a market cap of 46.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SNG.LS is priced at €1.17, while BEVER.AS trades at €2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNG.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.31, whereas BEVER.AS's P/E ratio is -9.33. In terms of profitability, SNG.LS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to BEVER.AS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SNG.LS is more volatile compared to BEVER.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNG.LS.Check BEVER.AS's competition here
SNG.LS vs ACCB.BR Comparison July 2025
SNG.LS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNG.LS stands at 11.7M. In comparison, ACCB.BR has a market cap of 36.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SNG.LS is priced at €1.17, while ACCB.BR trades at €0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNG.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.31, whereas ACCB.BR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNG.LS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ACCB.BR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SNG.LS is more volatile compared to ACCB.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNG.LS.Check ACCB.BR's competition here
SNG.LS vs BEAB.BR Comparison July 2025
SNG.LS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNG.LS stands at 11.7M. In comparison, BEAB.BR has a market cap of 24.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SNG.LS is priced at €1.17, while BEAB.BR trades at €1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNG.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.31, whereas BEAB.BR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNG.LS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to BEAB.BR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SNG.LS is more volatile compared to BEAB.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNG.LS.Check BEAB.BR's competition here
SNG.LS vs MLWRC.PA Comparison July 2025
SNG.LS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNG.LS stands at 11.7M. In comparison, MLWRC.PA has a market cap of 22.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SNG.LS is priced at €1.17, while MLWRC.PA trades at €3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNG.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.31, whereas MLWRC.PA's P/E ratio is 3.37. In terms of profitability, SNG.LS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to MLWRC.PA's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SNG.LS is more volatile compared to MLWRC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNG.LS.Check MLWRC.PA's competition here
SNG.LS vs ALSAS.PA Comparison July 2025
SNG.LS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNG.LS stands at 11.7M. In comparison, ALSAS.PA has a market cap of 21.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SNG.LS is priced at €1.17, while ALSAS.PA trades at €6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNG.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.31, whereas ALSAS.PA's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, SNG.LS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ALSAS.PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SNG.LS is more volatile compared to ALSAS.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNG.LS.Check ALSAS.PA's competition here
SNG.LS vs TAYN.PA Comparison July 2025
SNG.LS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNG.LS stands at 11.7M. In comparison, TAYN.PA has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SNG.LS is priced at €1.17, while TAYN.PA trades at €2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNG.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.31, whereas TAYN.PA's P/E ratio is 36.67. In terms of profitability, SNG.LS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to TAYN.PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SNG.LS is more volatile compared to TAYN.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNG.LS.Check TAYN.PA's competition here
SNG.LS vs MLPRI.PA Comparison July 2025
SNG.LS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNG.LS stands at 11.7M. In comparison, MLPRI.PA has a market cap of 19.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SNG.LS is priced at €1.17, while MLPRI.PA trades at €22.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNG.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.31, whereas MLPRI.PA's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, SNG.LS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to MLPRI.PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SNG.LS is more volatile compared to MLPRI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNG.LS.Check MLPRI.PA's competition here
SNG.LS vs MCC.BR Comparison July 2025
SNG.LS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNG.LS stands at 11.7M. In comparison, MCC.BR has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SNG.LS is priced at €1.17, while MCC.BR trades at €460.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNG.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.31, whereas MCC.BR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNG.LS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to MCC.BR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SNG.LS is more volatile compared to MCC.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNG.LS.Check MCC.BR's competition here
SNG.LS vs EBPF.PA Comparison July 2025
SNG.LS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNG.LS stands at 11.7M. In comparison, EBPF.PA has a market cap of 17.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SNG.LS is priced at €1.17, while EBPF.PA trades at €193.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNG.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.31, whereas EBPF.PA's P/E ratio is 4840.00. In terms of profitability, SNG.LS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to EBPF.PA's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SNG.LS is more volatile compared to EBPF.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNG.LS.Check EBPF.PA's competition here
SNG.LS vs IMMOU.BR Comparison July 2025
SNG.LS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNG.LS stands at 11.7M. In comparison, IMMOU.BR has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SNG.LS is priced at €1.17, while IMMOU.BR trades at €37.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNG.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.31, whereas IMMOU.BR's P/E ratio is 22.42. In terms of profitability, SNG.LS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to IMMOU.BR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SNG.LS is more volatile compared to IMMOU.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNG.LS.Check IMMOU.BR's competition here
SNG.LS vs DIEG.BR Comparison July 2025
SNG.LS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNG.LS stands at 11.7M. In comparison, DIEG.BR has a market cap of 13.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SNG.LS is priced at €1.17, while DIEG.BR trades at €110.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNG.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.31, whereas DIEG.BR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNG.LS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to DIEG.BR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SNG.LS is more volatile compared to DIEG.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNG.LS.Check DIEG.BR's competition here
SNG.LS vs FIPP.PA Comparison July 2025
SNG.LS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNG.LS stands at 11.7M. In comparison, FIPP.PA has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SNG.LS is priced at €1.17, while FIPP.PA trades at €0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNG.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.31, whereas FIPP.PA's P/E ratio is -2.90. In terms of profitability, SNG.LS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to FIPP.PA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SNG.LS is less volatile compared to FIPP.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNG.LS.Check FIPP.PA's competition here
SNG.LS vs ZEN.BR Comparison July 2025
SNG.LS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNG.LS stands at 11.7M. In comparison, ZEN.BR has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SNG.LS is priced at €1.17, while ZEN.BR trades at €212.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNG.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.31, whereas ZEN.BR's P/E ratio is 1247.06. In terms of profitability, SNG.LS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ZEN.BR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SNG.LS is more volatile compared to ZEN.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNG.LS.Check ZEN.BR's competition here
SNG.LS vs MLVIE.PA Comparison July 2025
SNG.LS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNG.LS stands at 11.7M. In comparison, MLVIE.PA has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SNG.LS is priced at €1.17, while MLVIE.PA trades at €115.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNG.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.31, whereas MLVIE.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNG.LS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to MLVIE.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SNG.LS is less volatile compared to MLVIE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNG.LS.Check MLVIE.PA's competition here
SNG.LS vs EFI.PA Comparison July 2025
SNG.LS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNG.LS stands at 11.7M. In comparison, EFI.PA has a market cap of 13M. Regarding current trading prices, SNG.LS is priced at €1.17, while EFI.PA trades at €0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNG.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.31, whereas EFI.PA's P/E ratio is -9.60. In terms of profitability, SNG.LS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to EFI.PA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SNG.LS is more volatile compared to EFI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNG.LS.Check EFI.PA's competition here
SNG.LS vs BERR.PA Comparison July 2025
SNG.LS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNG.LS stands at 11.7M. In comparison, BERR.PA has a market cap of 12.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SNG.LS is priced at €1.17, while BERR.PA trades at €11.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNG.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.31, whereas BERR.PA's P/E ratio is 1.64. In terms of profitability, SNG.LS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to BERR.PA's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SNG.LS is less volatile compared to BERR.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNG.LS.Check BERR.PA's competition here
SNG.LS vs ALEUA.PA Comparison July 2025
SNG.LS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNG.LS stands at 11.7M. In comparison, ALEUA.PA has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SNG.LS is priced at €1.17, while ALEUA.PA trades at €1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNG.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.31, whereas ALEUA.PA's P/E ratio is 0.76. In terms of profitability, SNG.LS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ALEUA.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SNG.LS is more volatile compared to ALEUA.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNG.LS.Check ALEUA.PA's competition here
SNG.LS vs COUR.PA Comparison July 2025
SNG.LS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNG.LS stands at 11.7M. In comparison, COUR.PA has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SNG.LS is priced at €1.17, while COUR.PA trades at €121.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNG.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.31, whereas COUR.PA's P/E ratio is -25.21. In terms of profitability, SNG.LS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to COUR.PA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SNG.LS is more volatile compared to COUR.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNG.LS.Check COUR.PA's competition here
SNG.LS vs ALREA.PA Comparison July 2025
SNG.LS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNG.LS stands at 11.7M. In comparison, ALREA.PA has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SNG.LS is priced at €1.17, while ALREA.PA trades at €1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNG.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.31, whereas ALREA.PA's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, SNG.LS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ALREA.PA's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SNG.LS is less volatile compared to ALREA.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNG.LS.Check ALREA.PA's competition here
SNG.LS vs ALNOR.LS Comparison July 2025
SNG.LS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNG.LS stands at 11.7M. In comparison, ALNOR.LS has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SNG.LS is priced at €1.17, while ALNOR.LS trades at €0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNG.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.31, whereas ALNOR.LS's P/E ratio is 2.28. In terms of profitability, SNG.LS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ALNOR.LS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SNG.LS is more volatile compared to ALNOR.LS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNG.LS.Check ALNOR.LS's competition here
SNG.LS vs MLNEU.BR Comparison July 2025
SNG.LS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNG.LS stands at 11.7M. In comparison, MLNEU.BR has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SNG.LS is priced at €1.17, while MLNEU.BR trades at €10.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNG.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.31, whereas MLNEU.BR's P/E ratio is -18.57. In terms of profitability, SNG.LS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to MLNEU.BR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SNG.LS is more volatile compared to MLNEU.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNG.LS.Check MLNEU.BR's competition here
SNG.LS vs BAS.BR Comparison July 2025
SNG.LS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNG.LS stands at 11.7M. In comparison, BAS.BR has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SNG.LS is priced at €1.17, while BAS.BR trades at €27.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNG.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.31, whereas BAS.BR's P/E ratio is -19.58. In terms of profitability, SNG.LS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to BAS.BR's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SNG.LS is less volatile compared to BAS.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNG.LS.Check BAS.BR's competition here
SNG.LS vs SOFT.BR Comparison July 2025
SNG.LS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNG.LS stands at 11.7M. In comparison, SOFT.BR has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SNG.LS is priced at €1.17, while SOFT.BR trades at €0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNG.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.31, whereas SOFT.BR's P/E ratio is -7.25. In terms of profitability, SNG.LS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SOFT.BR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SNG.LS is more volatile compared to SOFT.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNG.LS.Check SOFT.BR's competition here
SNG.LS vs CARP.PA Comparison July 2025
SNG.LS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNG.LS stands at 11.7M. In comparison, CARP.PA has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, SNG.LS is priced at €1.17, while CARP.PA trades at €6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNG.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.31, whereas CARP.PA's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, SNG.LS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CARP.PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SNG.LS is less volatile compared to CARP.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNG.LS.Check CARP.PA's competition here
SNG.LS vs EURS.PA Comparison July 2025
SNG.LS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNG.LS stands at 11.7M. In comparison, EURS.PA has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SNG.LS is priced at €1.17, while EURS.PA trades at €0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNG.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.31, whereas EURS.PA's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SNG.LS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to EURS.PA's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SNG.LS is more volatile compared to EURS.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNG.LS.Check EURS.PA's competition here
SNG.LS vs MLIPP.PA Comparison July 2025
SNG.LS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNG.LS stands at 11.7M. In comparison, MLIPP.PA has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SNG.LS is priced at €1.17, while MLIPP.PA trades at €45.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNG.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.31, whereas MLIPP.PA's P/E ratio is -11.34. In terms of profitability, SNG.LS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to MLIPP.PA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SNG.LS is more volatile compared to MLIPP.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNG.LS.Check MLIPP.PA's competition here
SNG.LS vs ANT.BR Comparison July 2025
SNG.LS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNG.LS stands at 11.7M. In comparison, ANT.BR has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SNG.LS is priced at €1.17, while ANT.BR trades at €7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNG.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.31, whereas ANT.BR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNG.LS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ANT.BR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SNG.LS is more volatile compared to ANT.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNG.LS.Check ANT.BR's competition here
SNG.LS vs MLALV.PA Comparison July 2025
SNG.LS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNG.LS stands at 11.7M. In comparison, MLALV.PA has a market cap of 947.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SNG.LS is priced at €1.17, while MLALV.PA trades at €0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNG.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.31, whereas MLALV.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNG.LS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to MLALV.PA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SNG.LS is more volatile compared to MLALV.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNG.LS.Check MLALV.PA's competition here
SNG.LS vs MLFTI.PA Comparison July 2025
SNG.LS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNG.LS stands at 11.7M. In comparison, MLFTI.PA has a market cap of 877.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SNG.LS is priced at €1.17, while MLFTI.PA trades at €0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNG.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.31, whereas MLFTI.PA's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, SNG.LS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to MLFTI.PA's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SNG.LS is more volatile compared to MLFTI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNG.LS.Check MLFTI.PA's competition here
SNG.LS vs CFI.PA Comparison July 2025
SNG.LS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNG.LS stands at 11.7M. In comparison, CFI.PA has a market cap of 651.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SNG.LS is priced at €1.17, while CFI.PA trades at €0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNG.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.31, whereas CFI.PA's P/E ratio is -10.56. In terms of profitability, SNG.LS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CFI.PA's ROE of -7.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SNG.LS is more volatile compared to CFI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNG.LS.Check CFI.PA's competition here
SNG.LS vs ALIMO.PA Comparison July 2025
SNG.LS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNG.LS stands at 11.7M. In comparison, ALIMO.PA has a market cap of 376.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SNG.LS is priced at €1.17, while ALIMO.PA trades at €0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNG.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.31, whereas ALIMO.PA's P/E ratio is -14.20. In terms of profitability, SNG.LS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ALIMO.PA's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SNG.LS is more volatile compared to ALIMO.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNG.LS.Check ALIMO.PA's competition here
SNG.LS vs ALADO.PA Comparison July 2025
SNG.LS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNG.LS stands at 11.7M. In comparison, ALADO.PA has a market cap of 326.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SNG.LS is priced at €1.17, while ALADO.PA trades at €0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNG.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.31, whereas ALADO.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNG.LS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ALADO.PA's ROE of -25.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SNG.LS is less volatile compared to ALADO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNG.LS.Check ALADO.PA's competition here
SNG.LS vs DISL.BR Comparison July 2025
SNG.LS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNG.LS stands at 11.7M. In comparison, DISL.BR has a market cap of 257.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SNG.LS is priced at €1.17, while DISL.BR trades at €206.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNG.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.31, whereas DISL.BR's P/E ratio is 29.94. In terms of profitability, SNG.LS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to DISL.BR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SNG.LS is more volatile compared to DISL.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNG.LS.Check DISL.BR's competition here
SNG.LS vs GENK.BR Comparison July 2025
SNG.LS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNG.LS stands at 11.7M. In comparison, GENK.BR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SNG.LS is priced at €1.17, while GENK.BR trades at €8.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNG.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.31, whereas GENK.BR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNG.LS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to GENK.BR's ROE of -18.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SNG.LS is more volatile compared to GENK.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNG.LS.Check GENK.BR's competition here
SNG.LS vs ML350.PA Comparison July 2025
SNG.LS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNG.LS stands at 11.7M. In comparison, ML350.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SNG.LS is priced at €1.17, while ML350.PA trades at €0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNG.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.31, whereas ML350.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNG.LS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ML350.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SNG.LS is more volatile compared to ML350.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNG.LS.Check ML350.PA's competition here