SMA Solar Technology AG
SMA Solar Technology AG (SMTGF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SMTGF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Solar Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMTGF | $23.73 | -0.00% | 823.5M | -5.04 | -$4.71 | +2.20% |
| GCPEF | $0.17 | +0.00% | 4.8B | -5.67 | -$0.03 | N/A |
| XISHY | $7.67 | -4.10% | 3.5B | 24.75 | $0.31 | +3.34% |
| XNYIF | $0.35 | -20.37% | 3.1B | 17.32 | $0.02 | +3.70% |
| SMTGY | $2.28 | +6.54% | 791.2M | -4.85 | -$0.47 | N/A |
| PXPC | $2.16 | +0.00% | 718.6M | -36.00 | -$0.06 | N/A |
| GRMZF | $11.30 | +0.00% | 261.1M | 21.32 | $0.53 | +1.26% |
| HYSR | $0.04 | +12.45% | 215.2M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| CSSXF | $0.03 | +0.00% | 75.6M | -3.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| SPRQF | $0.56 | +0.00% | 65.5M | -14.00 | -$0.04 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SMTGF vs GCPEF Comparison July 2025
SMTGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMTGF stands at 823.5M. In comparison, GCPEF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMTGF is priced at $23.73, while GCPEF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMTGF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.04, whereas GCPEF's P/E ratio is -5.67. In terms of profitability, SMTGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to GCPEF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMTGF and GCPEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GCPEF's competition here
SMTGF vs XISHY Comparison July 2025
SMTGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMTGF stands at 823.5M. In comparison, XISHY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMTGF is priced at $23.73, while XISHY trades at $7.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMTGF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.04, whereas XISHY's P/E ratio is 24.75. In terms of profitability, SMTGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to XISHY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMTGF is less volatile compared to XISHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMTGF.Check XISHY's competition here
SMTGF vs XNYIF Comparison July 2025
SMTGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMTGF stands at 823.5M. In comparison, XNYIF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMTGF is priced at $23.73, while XNYIF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMTGF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.04, whereas XNYIF's P/E ratio is 17.32. In terms of profitability, SMTGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to XNYIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMTGF is less volatile compared to XNYIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMTGF.Check XNYIF's competition here
SMTGF vs SMTGY Comparison July 2025
SMTGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMTGF stands at 823.5M. In comparison, SMTGY has a market cap of 791.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SMTGF is priced at $23.73, while SMTGY trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMTGF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.04, whereas SMTGY's P/E ratio is -4.85. In terms of profitability, SMTGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to SMTGY's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SMTGF is less volatile compared to SMTGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMTGF.Check SMTGY's competition here
SMTGF vs PXPC Comparison July 2025
SMTGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMTGF stands at 823.5M. In comparison, PXPC has a market cap of 718.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SMTGF is priced at $23.73, while PXPC trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMTGF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.04, whereas PXPC's P/E ratio is -36.00. In terms of profitability, SMTGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to PXPC's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, SMTGF is less volatile compared to PXPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMTGF.Check PXPC's competition here
SMTGF vs GRMZF Comparison July 2025
SMTGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMTGF stands at 823.5M. In comparison, GRMZF has a market cap of 261.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SMTGF is priced at $23.73, while GRMZF trades at $11.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMTGF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.04, whereas GRMZF's P/E ratio is 21.32. In terms of profitability, SMTGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to GRMZF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SMTGF is less volatile compared to GRMZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMTGF.Check GRMZF's competition here
SMTGF vs HYSR Comparison July 2025
SMTGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMTGF stands at 823.5M. In comparison, HYSR has a market cap of 215.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SMTGF is priced at $23.73, while HYSR trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMTGF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.04, whereas HYSR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMTGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to HYSR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SMTGF is less volatile compared to HYSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMTGF.Check HYSR's competition here
SMTGF vs CSSXF Comparison July 2025
SMTGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMTGF stands at 823.5M. In comparison, CSSXF has a market cap of 75.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SMTGF is priced at $23.73, while CSSXF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMTGF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.04, whereas CSSXF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, SMTGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to CSSXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMTGF and CSSXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CSSXF's competition here
SMTGF vs SPRQF Comparison July 2025
SMTGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMTGF stands at 823.5M. In comparison, SPRQF has a market cap of 65.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMTGF is priced at $23.73, while SPRQF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMTGF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.04, whereas SPRQF's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, SMTGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to SPRQF's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SMTGF and SPRQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SPRQF's competition here
SMTGF vs UGEIF Comparison July 2025
SMTGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMTGF stands at 823.5M. In comparison, UGEIF has a market cap of 49.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SMTGF is priced at $23.73, while UGEIF trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMTGF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.04, whereas UGEIF's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, SMTGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to UGEIF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SMTGF and UGEIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UGEIF's competition here
SMTGF vs CVUEF Comparison July 2025
SMTGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMTGF stands at 823.5M. In comparison, CVUEF has a market cap of 39.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SMTGF is priced at $23.73, while CVUEF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMTGF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.04, whereas CVUEF's P/E ratio is -4.77. In terms of profitability, SMTGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to CVUEF's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SMTGF is less volatile compared to CVUEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMTGF.Check CVUEF's competition here
SMTGF vs NEWH Comparison July 2025
SMTGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMTGF stands at 823.5M. In comparison, NEWH has a market cap of 30.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SMTGF is priced at $23.73, while NEWH trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMTGF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.04, whereas NEWH's P/E ratio is -4.34. In terms of profitability, SMTGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to NEWH's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SMTGF is less volatile compared to NEWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMTGF.Check NEWH's competition here
SMTGF vs FLDI Comparison July 2025
SMTGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMTGF stands at 823.5M. In comparison, FLDI has a market cap of 22.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SMTGF is priced at $23.73, while FLDI trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMTGF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.04, whereas FLDI's P/E ratio is -750.00. In terms of profitability, SMTGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to FLDI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMTGF is less volatile compared to FLDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMTGF.Check FLDI's competition here
SMTGF vs CBUTF Comparison July 2025
SMTGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMTGF stands at 823.5M. In comparison, CBUTF has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SMTGF is priced at $23.73, while CBUTF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMTGF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.04, whereas CBUTF's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, SMTGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to CBUTF's ROE of +1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, SMTGF is less volatile compared to CBUTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMTGF.Check CBUTF's competition here
SMTGF vs SEHLF Comparison July 2025
SMTGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMTGF stands at 823.5M. In comparison, SEHLF has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SMTGF is priced at $23.73, while SEHLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMTGF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.04, whereas SEHLF's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, SMTGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to SEHLF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMTGF and SEHLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SEHLF's competition here
SMTGF vs NTCXF Comparison July 2025
SMTGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMTGF stands at 823.5M. In comparison, NTCXF has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SMTGF is priced at $23.73, while NTCXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMTGF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.04, whereas NTCXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMTGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to NTCXF's ROE of +0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, SMTGF is less volatile compared to NTCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMTGF.Check NTCXF's competition here
SMTGF vs SAENF Comparison July 2025
SMTGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMTGF stands at 823.5M. In comparison, SAENF has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SMTGF is priced at $23.73, while SAENF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMTGF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.04, whereas SAENF's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, SMTGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to SAENF's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SMTGF is less volatile compared to SAENF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMTGF.Check SAENF's competition here
SMTGF vs AACTF Comparison July 2025
SMTGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMTGF stands at 823.5M. In comparison, AACTF has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMTGF is priced at $23.73, while AACTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMTGF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.04, whereas AACTF's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, SMTGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to AACTF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SMTGF and AACTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AACTF's competition here
SMTGF vs TSPG Comparison July 2025
SMTGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMTGF stands at 823.5M. In comparison, TSPG has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SMTGF is priced at $23.73, while TSPG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMTGF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.04, whereas TSPG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMTGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to TSPG's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SMTGF is less volatile compared to TSPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMTGF.Check TSPG's competition here
SMTGF vs PTOS Comparison July 2025
SMTGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMTGF stands at 823.5M. In comparison, PTOS has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SMTGF is priced at $23.73, while PTOS trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMTGF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.04, whereas PTOS's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, SMTGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to PTOS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMTGF and PTOS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PTOS's competition here
SMTGF vs QCLSF Comparison July 2025
SMTGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMTGF stands at 823.5M. In comparison, QCLSF has a market cap of 621.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SMTGF is priced at $23.73, while QCLSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMTGF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.04, whereas QCLSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMTGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to QCLSF's ROE of -1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SMTGF is less volatile compared to QCLSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMTGF.Check QCLSF's competition here
SMTGF vs ANTGF Comparison July 2025
SMTGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMTGF stands at 823.5M. In comparison, ANTGF has a market cap of 578K. Regarding current trading prices, SMTGF is priced at $23.73, while ANTGF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMTGF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.04, whereas ANTGF's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, SMTGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to ANTGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SMTGF and ANTGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ANTGF's competition here
SMTGF vs PSWW Comparison July 2025
SMTGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMTGF stands at 823.5M. In comparison, PSWW has a market cap of 158.9K. Regarding current trading prices, SMTGF is priced at $23.73, while PSWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMTGF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.04, whereas PSWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMTGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to PSWW's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SMTGF is less volatile compared to PSWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMTGF.Check PSWW's competition here
SMTGF vs SRWRF Comparison July 2025
SMTGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMTGF stands at 823.5M. In comparison, SRWRF has a market cap of 149K. Regarding current trading prices, SMTGF is priced at $23.73, while SRWRF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMTGF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.04, whereas SRWRF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SMTGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to SRWRF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMTGF is less volatile compared to SRWRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMTGF.Check SRWRF's competition here
SMTGF vs UNSS Comparison July 2025
SMTGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMTGF stands at 823.5M. In comparison, UNSS has a market cap of 60.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SMTGF is priced at $23.73, while UNSS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMTGF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.04, whereas UNSS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMTGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to UNSS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMTGF and UNSS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UNSS's competition here
SMTGF vs SPSO Comparison July 2025
SMTGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMTGF stands at 823.5M. In comparison, SPSO has a market cap of 43.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SMTGF is priced at $23.73, while SPSO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMTGF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.04, whereas SPSO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMTGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to SPSO's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, SMTGF and SPSO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SPSO's competition here
SMTGF vs ABCE Comparison July 2025
SMTGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMTGF stands at 823.5M. In comparison, ABCE has a market cap of 26.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SMTGF is priced at $23.73, while ABCE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMTGF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.04, whereas ABCE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SMTGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to ABCE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMTGF and ABCE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ABCE's competition here
SMTGF vs OPVS Comparison July 2025
SMTGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMTGF stands at 823.5M. In comparison, OPVS has a market cap of 24K. Regarding current trading prices, SMTGF is priced at $23.73, while OPVS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMTGF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.04, whereas OPVS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SMTGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to OPVS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMTGF and OPVS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OPVS's competition here
SMTGF vs CHJI Comparison July 2025
SMTGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMTGF stands at 823.5M. In comparison, CHJI has a market cap of 19.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SMTGF is priced at $23.73, while CHJI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMTGF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.04, whereas CHJI's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, SMTGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to CHJI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMTGF and CHJI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHJI's competition here
SMTGF vs SOEN Comparison July 2025
SMTGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMTGF stands at 823.5M. In comparison, SOEN has a market cap of 18.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SMTGF is priced at $23.73, while SOEN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMTGF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.04, whereas SOEN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SMTGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to SOEN's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SMTGF and SOEN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SOEN's competition here
SMTGF vs SNRS Comparison July 2025
SMTGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMTGF stands at 823.5M. In comparison, SNRS has a market cap of 16.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SMTGF is priced at $23.73, while SNRS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMTGF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.04, whereas SNRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMTGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to SNRS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMTGF and SNRS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SNRS's competition here
SMTGF vs NTAC Comparison July 2025
SMTGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMTGF stands at 823.5M. In comparison, NTAC has a market cap of 12.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SMTGF is priced at $23.73, while NTAC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMTGF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.04, whereas NTAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMTGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to NTAC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SMTGF is less volatile compared to NTAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMTGF.Check NTAC's competition here
SMTGF vs SIRC Comparison July 2025
SMTGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMTGF stands at 823.5M. In comparison, SIRC has a market cap of 11K. Regarding current trading prices, SMTGF is priced at $23.73, while SIRC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMTGF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.04, whereas SIRC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMTGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to SIRC's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, SMTGF and SIRC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SIRC's competition here
SMTGF vs XDSL Comparison July 2025
SMTGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMTGF stands at 823.5M. In comparison, XDSL has a market cap of 8.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SMTGF is priced at $23.73, while XDSL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMTGF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.04, whereas XDSL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMTGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to XDSL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMTGF and XDSL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XDSL's competition here
SMTGF vs MBCI Comparison July 2025
SMTGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMTGF stands at 823.5M. In comparison, MBCI has a market cap of 7K. Regarding current trading prices, SMTGF is priced at $23.73, while MBCI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMTGF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.04, whereas MBCI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SMTGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to MBCI's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SMTGF and MBCI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MBCI's competition here
SMTGF vs SUNWQ Comparison July 2025
SMTGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMTGF stands at 823.5M. In comparison, SUNWQ has a market cap of 5.7K. Regarding current trading prices, SMTGF is priced at $23.73, while SUNWQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMTGF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.04, whereas SUNWQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMTGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to SUNWQ's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SMTGF and SUNWQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SUNWQ's competition here
SMTGF vs VSOLF Comparison July 2025
SMTGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMTGF stands at 823.5M. In comparison, VSOLF has a market cap of 4.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SMTGF is priced at $23.73, while VSOLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMTGF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.04, whereas VSOLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMTGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to VSOLF's ROE of -2.90%. Regarding short-term risk, SMTGF and VSOLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VSOLF's competition here
SMTGF vs APVNF Comparison July 2025
SMTGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMTGF stands at 823.5M. In comparison, APVNF has a market cap of 3.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SMTGF is priced at $23.73, while APVNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMTGF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.04, whereas APVNF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SMTGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to APVNF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, SMTGF is less volatile compared to APVNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMTGF.Check APVNF's competition here
SMTGF vs PPRW Comparison July 2025
SMTGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMTGF stands at 823.5M. In comparison, PPRW has a market cap of 3.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SMTGF is priced at $23.73, while PPRW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMTGF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.04, whereas PPRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMTGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to PPRW's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, SMTGF and PPRW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PPRW's competition here
SMTGF vs GRYG Comparison July 2025
SMTGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMTGF stands at 823.5M. In comparison, GRYG has a market cap of 3K. Regarding current trading prices, SMTGF is priced at $23.73, while GRYG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMTGF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.04, whereas GRYG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMTGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to GRYG's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SMTGF is less volatile compared to GRYG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMTGF.Check GRYG's competition here
SMTGF vs GSLO Comparison July 2025
SMTGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMTGF stands at 823.5M. In comparison, GSLO has a market cap of 851. Regarding current trading prices, SMTGF is priced at $23.73, while GSLO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMTGF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.04, whereas GSLO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMTGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to GSLO's ROE of +20.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMTGF and GSLO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GSLO's competition here
SMTGF vs EDYYF Comparison July 2025
SMTGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMTGF stands at 823.5M. In comparison, EDYYF has a market cap of 750. Regarding current trading prices, SMTGF is priced at $23.73, while EDYYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMTGF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.04, whereas EDYYF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMTGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to EDYYF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SMTGF is less volatile compared to EDYYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMTGF.Check EDYYF's competition here
SMTGF vs EBODF Comparison July 2025
SMTGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMTGF stands at 823.5M. In comparison, EBODF has a market cap of 244. Regarding current trading prices, SMTGF is priced at $23.73, while EBODF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMTGF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.04, whereas EBODF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMTGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to EBODF's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, SMTGF and EBODF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EBODF's competition here
SMTGF vs IXEH Comparison July 2025
SMTGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMTGF stands at 823.5M. In comparison, IXEH has a market cap of 72. Regarding current trading prices, SMTGF is priced at $23.73, while IXEH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMTGF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.04, whereas IXEH's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SMTGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to IXEH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMTGF and IXEH have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IXEH's competition here
SMTGF vs ISUNQ Comparison July 2025
SMTGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMTGF stands at 823.5M. In comparison, ISUNQ has a market cap of 47. Regarding current trading prices, SMTGF is priced at $23.73, while ISUNQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMTGF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.04, whereas ISUNQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMTGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to ISUNQ's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SMTGF and ISUNQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ISUNQ's competition here
SMTGF vs KOVR Comparison July 2025
SMTGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMTGF stands at 823.5M. In comparison, KOVR has a market cap of 44. Regarding current trading prices, SMTGF is priced at $23.73, while KOVR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMTGF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.04, whereas KOVR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMTGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to KOVR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMTGF and KOVR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KOVR's competition here