Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust PLC
Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust PLC SMT.L Peers
See (SMT.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMT.L | £1,006.50 | +0.35% | 11.8B | 10.59 | £0.95 | +0.42% |
| UC65.L | £58.97 | -0.69% | 5.1T | N/A | N/A | +1.70% |
| UB02.L | £4,336.50 | -0.94% | 3.7T | N/A | N/A | +1.84% |
| IUSA.L | £4,402.25 | +0.10% | 1.3T | N/A | N/A | +1.08% |
| SSAC.L | £6,986.50 | +0.08% | 1T | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| EQGB.L | £41,717.50 | +0.82% | 985.1B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SMEA.L | £7,333.00 | +0.20% | 847.1B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| XESX.L | £4,793.25 | +0.16% | 793.1B | N/A | N/A | +2.73% |
| XESC.L | £7,893.00 | +0.04% | 792.8B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| MEUD.L | £22,220.00 | +0.20% | 768.2B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SMT.L vs UC65.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, UC65.L has a market cap of 5.1T. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while UC65.L trades at £58.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas UC65.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UC65.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to UC65.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs UB02.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, UB02.L has a market cap of 3.7T. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while UB02.L trades at £4,336.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas UB02.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UB02.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to UB02.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs IUSA.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, IUSA.L has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while IUSA.L trades at £4,402.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas IUSA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IUSA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to IUSA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs SSAC.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, SSAC.L has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while SSAC.L trades at £6,986.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas SSAC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SSAC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to SSAC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs EQGB.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, EQGB.L has a market cap of 985.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while EQGB.L trades at £41,717.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas EQGB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EQGB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is less volatile compared to EQGB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs SMEA.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, SMEA.L has a market cap of 847.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while SMEA.L trades at £7,333.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas SMEA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SMEA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to SMEA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs XESX.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, XESX.L has a market cap of 793.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while XESX.L trades at £4,793.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas XESX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XESX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to XESX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs XESC.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, XESC.L has a market cap of 792.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while XESC.L trades at £7,893.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas XESC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XESC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to XESC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs MEUD.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, MEUD.L has a market cap of 768.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while MEUD.L trades at £22,220.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas MEUD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MEUD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to MEUD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs IITU.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, IITU.L has a market cap of 748.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while IITU.L trades at £2,534.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas IITU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IITU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to IITU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs JPSR.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, JPSR.L has a market cap of 690.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while JPSR.L trades at £1,953.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas JPSR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JPSR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to JPSR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs UB0D.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, UB0D.L has a market cap of 684.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while UB0D.L trades at £2,140.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas UB0D.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UB0D.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to UB0D.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs JT13.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, JT13.L has a market cap of 673.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while JT13.L trades at £595.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas JT13.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JT13.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to JT13.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs CNAL.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, CNAL.L has a market cap of 628.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while CNAL.L trades at £11,125.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas CNAL.L's P/E ratio is -10.40. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CNAL.L's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to CNAL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs IWRD.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, IWRD.L has a market cap of 545.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while IWRD.L trades at £6,162.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas IWRD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IWRD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to IWRD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs XDAX.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, XDAX.L has a market cap of 544.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while XDAX.L trades at £19,208.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas XDAX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XDAX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to XDAX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs PHGP.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, PHGP.L has a market cap of 503.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while PHGP.L trades at £23,040.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas PHGP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PHGP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to PHGP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs GLDA.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, GLDA.L has a market cap of 490.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while GLDA.L trades at £9,812.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas GLDA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GLDA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to GLDA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs XMMS.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, XMMS.L has a market cap of 484.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while XMMS.L trades at £4,653.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas XMMS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XMMS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to XMMS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs MXWS.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, MXWS.L has a market cap of 460.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while MXWS.L trades at £9,043.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas MXWS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MXWS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to MXWS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs XMUS.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, XMUS.L has a market cap of 436.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while XMUS.L trades at £13,127.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas XMUS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XMUS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to XMUS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs UC44.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, UC44.L has a market cap of 422B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while UC44.L trades at £12,679.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas UC44.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UC44.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to UC44.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs XMEU.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, XMEU.L has a market cap of 421.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while XMEU.L trades at £8,379.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas XMEU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XMEU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to XMEU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs CS51.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, CS51.L has a market cap of 415.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while CS51.L trades at £17,276.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas CS51.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CS51.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to CS51.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs EUE.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, EUE.L has a market cap of 371.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while EUE.L trades at £4,676.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas EUE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EUE.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to EUE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs IEEM.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, IEEM.L has a market cap of 370.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while IEEM.L trades at £3,418.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas IEEM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IEEM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to IEEM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs UB32.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, UB32.L has a market cap of 349.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while UB32.L trades at £8,696.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas UB32.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UB32.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to UB32.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs CACX.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, CACX.L has a market cap of 340.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while CACX.L trades at £6,607.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas CACX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CACX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to CACX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs SEMA.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, SEMA.L has a market cap of 305.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while SEMA.L trades at £3,213.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas SEMA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SEMA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to SEMA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs XSX6.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, XSX6.L has a market cap of 305.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while XSX6.L trades at £11,772.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas XSX6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XSX6.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to XSX6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs GBSS.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, GBSS.L has a market cap of 298.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while GBSS.L trades at £22,641.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas GBSS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GBSS.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to GBSS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs IWFQ.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, IWFQ.L has a market cap of 292B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while IWFQ.L trades at £5,299.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas IWFQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IWFQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to IWFQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs SGBX.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, SGBX.L has a market cap of 273.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while SGBX.L trades at £23,681.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas SGBX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SGBX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to SGBX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs IWFV.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, IWFV.L has a market cap of 268.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while IWFV.L trades at £3,583.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas IWFV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IWFV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to IWFV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs ISPY.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, ISPY.L has a market cap of 251.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while ISPY.L trades at £2,354.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas ISPY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ISPY.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is less volatile compared to ISPY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs CEA1.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, CEA1.L has a market cap of 236.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while CEA1.L trades at £14,601.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas CEA1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CEA1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to CEA1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs RBTX.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, RBTX.L has a market cap of 226.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while RBTX.L trades at £1,064.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas RBTX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RBTX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to RBTX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs JERE.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, JERE.L has a market cap of 223B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while JERE.L trades at £3,916.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas JERE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JERE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to JERE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs JRDE.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, JRDE.L has a market cap of 222.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while JRDE.L trades at £3,674.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas JRDE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JRDE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to JRDE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs CPJ1.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, CPJ1.L has a market cap of 222.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while CPJ1.L trades at £15,172.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas CPJ1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CPJ1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to CPJ1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs SUES.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, SUES.L has a market cap of 220.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while SUES.L trades at £595.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas SUES.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SUES.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to SUES.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs PHSP.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, PHSP.L has a market cap of 204.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while PHSP.L trades at £2,402.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas PHSP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PHSP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is less volatile compared to PHSP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs IUQF.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, IUQF.L has a market cap of 201.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while IUQF.L trades at £1,106.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas IUQF.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IUQF.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to IUQF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs HMEF.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, HMEF.L has a market cap of 197.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while HMEF.L trades at £870.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas HMEF.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HMEF.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to HMEF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs IWFM.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, IWFM.L has a market cap of 194.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while IWFM.L trades at £6,557.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas IWFM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IWFM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to IWFM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs XDEV.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, XDEV.L has a market cap of 181.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while XDEV.L trades at £3,683.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas XDEV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XDEV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to XDEV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs SOYU.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, SOYU.L has a market cap of 178B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while SOYU.L trades at £306.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas SOYU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SOYU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to SOYU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs CEUR.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, CEUR.L has a market cap of 170.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while CEUR.L trades at £31,022.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas CEUR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CEUR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to CEUR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs UIFS.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, UIFS.L has a market cap of 165.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while UIFS.L trades at £1,089.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas UIFS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UIFS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to UIFS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs XXSC.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, XXSC.L has a market cap of 164.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while XXSC.L trades at £5,478.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas XXSC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XXSC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to XXSC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs SPGP.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, SPGP.L has a market cap of 163.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while SPGP.L trades at £1,791.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas SPGP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SPGP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is less volatile compared to SPGP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs XDEQ.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, XDEQ.L has a market cap of 157.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while XDEQ.L trades at £5,391.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas XDEQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XDEQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to XDEQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs GBSP.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, GBSP.L has a market cap of 148.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while GBSP.L trades at £1,728.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas GBSP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GBSP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to GBSP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs PRIR.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, PRIR.L has a market cap of 147.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while PRIR.L trades at £1,460.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas PRIR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PRIR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to PRIR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs IEFV.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, IEFV.L has a market cap of 141.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while IEFV.L trades at £861.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas IEFV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IEFV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to IEFV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs CU1.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, CU1.L has a market cap of 140.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while CU1.L trades at £45,397.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas CU1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CU1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to CU1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs ISP6.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, ISP6.L has a market cap of 137.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while ISP6.L trades at £6,374.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas ISP6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ISP6.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to ISP6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs WATL.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, WATL.L has a market cap of 135.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while WATL.L trades at £5,788.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas WATL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WATL.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to WATL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs IPRP.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, IPRP.L has a market cap of 133.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while IPRP.L trades at £2,684.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas IPRP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IPRP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to IPRP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs GILS.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, GILS.L has a market cap of 132B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while GILS.L trades at £10,118.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas GILS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GILS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to GILS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs XZEU.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, XZEU.L has a market cap of 131.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while XZEU.L trades at £2,824.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas XZEU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XZEU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to XZEU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs XCX6.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, XCX6.L has a market cap of 129.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while XCX6.L trades at £1,320.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas XCX6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XCX6.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to XCX6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs CUS1.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, CUS1.L has a market cap of 128.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while CUS1.L trades at £37,702.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas CUS1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CUS1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to CUS1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs UC79.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, UC79.L has a market cap of 122.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while UC79.L trades at £1,107.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas UC79.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UC79.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to UC79.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs 0GWB.IL Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, 0GWB.IL has a market cap of 120.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while 0GWB.IL trades at £492.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas 0GWB.IL's P/E ratio is 15.96. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0GWB.IL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to 0GWB.IL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs INFL.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, INFL.L has a market cap of 120.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while INFL.L trades at £9,631.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas INFL.L's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to INFL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is less volatile compared to INFL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs CG1.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, CG1.L has a market cap of 119.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while CG1.L trades at £36,385.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas CG1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CG1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to CG1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs SP5G.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, SP5G.L has a market cap of 117.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while SP5G.L trades at £203.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas SP5G.L's P/E ratio is 63.29. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SP5G.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to SP5G.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs CSPX.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, CSPX.L has a market cap of 115B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while CSPX.L trades at £638.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas CSPX.L's P/E ratio is 26.35. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CSPX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to CSPX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs CB5.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, CB5.L has a market cap of 114.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while CB5.L trades at £3,870.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas CB5.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CB5.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to CB5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs XRSG.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, XRSG.L has a market cap of 112.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while XRSG.L trades at £22,765.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas XRSG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XRSG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to XRSG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs IGSG.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, IGSG.L has a market cap of 109.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while IGSG.L trades at £5,852.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas IGSG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IGSG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to IGSG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs H50E.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, H50E.L has a market cap of 108.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while H50E.L trades at £4,874.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas H50E.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to H50E.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to H50E.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs SPEX.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, SPEX.L has a market cap of 107.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while SPEX.L trades at £4,397.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas SPEX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SPEX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to SPEX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs SPES.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, SPES.L has a market cap of 107.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while SPES.L trades at £4,156.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas SPES.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SPES.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to SPES.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs IEUX.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, IEUX.L has a market cap of 107.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while IEUX.L trades at £4,087.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas IEUX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IEUX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to IEUX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs XDEM.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, XDEM.L has a market cap of 107.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while XDEM.L trades at £5,520.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas XDEM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XDEM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to XDEM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs IJPN.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, IJPN.L has a market cap of 107.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while IJPN.L trades at £1,378.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas IJPN.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IJPN.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to IJPN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs PRIC.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, PRIC.L has a market cap of 106.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while PRIC.L trades at £1,596.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas PRIC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PRIC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to PRIC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs JRDM.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, JRDM.L has a market cap of 106.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while JRDM.L trades at £2,316.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas JRDM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JRDM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to JRDM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs RIEG.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, RIEG.L has a market cap of 106.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while RIEG.L trades at £1,442.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas RIEG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RIEG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to RIEG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs IWDA.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, IWDA.L has a market cap of 105B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while IWDA.L trades at £114.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas IWDA.L's P/E ratio is 23.02. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IWDA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to IWDA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs DAXX.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, DAXX.L has a market cap of 102.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while DAXX.L trades at £18,748.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas DAXX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DAXX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to DAXX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs IMV.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, IMV.L has a market cap of 101.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while IMV.L trades at £5,779.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas IMV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IMV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to IMV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs CSCA.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, CSCA.L has a market cap of 97.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while CSCA.L trades at £17,049.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas CSCA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CSCA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to CSCA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs TRXS.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, TRXS.L has a market cap of 96.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while TRXS.L trades at £3,374.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas TRXS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TRXS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to TRXS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs MTIX.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, MTIX.L has a market cap of 92.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while MTIX.L trades at £13,979.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas MTIX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MTIX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to MTIX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs PRIJ.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, PRIJ.L has a market cap of 92.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while PRIJ.L trades at £2,378.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas PRIJ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PRIJ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to PRIJ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs UB45.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, UB45.L has a market cap of 90.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while UB45.L trades at £6,085.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas UB45.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UB45.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to UB45.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs IUKD.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, IUKD.L has a market cap of 90.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while IUKD.L trades at £839.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas IUKD.L's P/E ratio is 15.05. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IUKD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to IUKD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs XDN0.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, XDN0.L has a market cap of 90.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while XDN0.L trades at £4,239.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas XDN0.L's P/E ratio is 18.05. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XDN0.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to XDN0.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs WQDS.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, WQDS.L has a market cap of 88.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while WQDS.L trades at £545.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas WQDS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WQDS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to WQDS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs EQDS.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, EQDS.L has a market cap of 88.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while EQDS.L trades at £544.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas EQDS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EQDS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to EQDS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs XLKQ.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, XLKQ.L has a market cap of 87.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while XLKQ.L trades at £51,995.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas XLKQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XLKQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to XLKQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs COMM.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, COMM.L has a market cap of 87B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while COMM.L trades at £537.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas COMM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to COMM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to COMM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs CRPX.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, CRPX.L has a market cap of 84.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while CRPX.L trades at £12,838.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas CRPX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CRPX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to CRPX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs CSP1.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, CSP1.L has a market cap of 84.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while CSP1.L trades at £47,025.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas CSP1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CSP1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to CSP1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs IGUS.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, IGUS.L has a market cap of 84.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while IGUS.L trades at £13,670.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas IGUS.L's P/E ratio is 26.03. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IGUS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to IGUS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.
SMT.L vs XDEB.L Comparison
SMT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMT.L stands at 11.8B. In comparison, XDEB.L has a market cap of 82.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMT.L is priced at £1,006.50, while XDEB.L trades at £3,581.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.59, whereas XDEB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMT.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XDEB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMT.L is more volatile compared to XDEB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMT.L.