SMS Co., Ltd.
SMS Co., Ltd. (SMSZF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SMSZF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Medical - Healthcare Information Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMSZF | $8.56 | +0.00% | 705.3M | 17.83 | $0.48 | +2.22% |
| PMCUF | $200.91 | +1.98% | 21B | 282.97 | $0.71 | +0.15% |
| MTHRY | $7.71 | -1.97% | 10.5B | 38.60 | $0.20 | N/A |
| MTHRF | $13.77 | +0.00% | 9.3B | 34.42 | $0.40 | +1.02% |
| PANHF | $2.10 | +0.00% | 4.5B | 210.00 | $0.01 | +59.36% |
| PIAHY | $4.25 | +0.00% | 2.4B | 141.67 | $0.03 | +116.97% |
| CMPVF | $23.75 | -0.44% | 1.2B | 40.95 | $0.58 | +0.49% |
| CMPUY | $23.00 | -7.26% | 1.2B | 38.98 | $0.59 | N/A |
| CRWRF | $32.40 | +0.00% | 1.1B | 77.14 | $0.42 | +1.17% |
| RSLBF | $28.41 | -7.61% | 973.9M | 48.15 | $0.59 | +1.11% |
Stock Comparison
SMSZF vs PMCUF Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, PMCUF has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while PMCUF trades at $200.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas PMCUF's P/E ratio is 282.97. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PMCUF's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to PMCUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check PMCUF's competition here
SMSZF vs MTHRY Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, MTHRY has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while MTHRY trades at $7.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas MTHRY's P/E ratio is 38.60. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MTHRY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to MTHRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check MTHRY's competition here
SMSZF vs MTHRF Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, MTHRF has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while MTHRF trades at $13.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas MTHRF's P/E ratio is 34.42. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MTHRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to MTHRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check MTHRF's competition here
SMSZF vs PANHF Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, PANHF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while PANHF trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas PANHF's P/E ratio is 210.00. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PANHF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is less volatile compared to PANHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check PANHF's competition here
SMSZF vs PIAHY Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, PIAHY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while PIAHY trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas PIAHY's P/E ratio is 141.67. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PIAHY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to PIAHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check PIAHY's competition here
SMSZF vs CMPVF Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, CMPVF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while CMPVF trades at $23.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas CMPVF's P/E ratio is 40.95. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CMPVF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to CMPVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check CMPVF's competition here
SMSZF vs CMPUY Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, CMPUY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while CMPUY trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas CMPUY's P/E ratio is 38.98. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CMPUY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to CMPUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check CMPUY's competition here
SMSZF vs CRWRF Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, CRWRF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while CRWRF trades at $32.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas CRWRF's P/E ratio is 77.14. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CRWRF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to CRWRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check CRWRF's competition here
SMSZF vs RSLBF Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, RSLBF has a market cap of 973.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while RSLBF trades at $28.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas RSLBF's P/E ratio is 48.15. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RSLBF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to RSLBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check RSLBF's competition here
SMSZF vs VHIBF Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, VHIBF has a market cap of 546.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while VHIBF trades at $9.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas VHIBF's P/E ratio is 165.44. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VHIBF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to VHIBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check VHIBF's competition here
SMSZF vs SUSRF Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, SUSRF has a market cap of 533.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while SUSRF trades at $10.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas SUSRF's P/E ratio is 36.03. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SUSRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to SUSRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check SUSRF's competition here
SMSZF vs KSIOF Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, KSIOF has a market cap of 390.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while KSIOF trades at $4.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas KSIOF's P/E ratio is 411.00. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KSIOF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to KSIOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check KSIOF's competition here
SMSZF vs SMDCF Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, SMDCF has a market cap of 280.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while SMDCF trades at $17.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas SMDCF's P/E ratio is -17.32. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SMDCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to SMDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check SMDCF's competition here
SMSZF vs DLHTF Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, DLHTF has a market cap of 254.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while DLHTF trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas DLHTF's P/E ratio is -17.24. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DLHTF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to DLHTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check DLHTF's competition here
SMSZF vs COGZF Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, COGZF has a market cap of 199M. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while COGZF trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas COGZF's P/E ratio is 29.25. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to COGZF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to COGZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check COGZF's competition here
SMSZF vs VPAHF Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, VPAHF has a market cap of 188.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while VPAHF trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas VPAHF's P/E ratio is -37.00. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VPAHF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to VPAHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check VPAHF's competition here
SMSZF vs BNVIF Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, BNVIF has a market cap of 170.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while BNVIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas BNVIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BNVIF's ROE of -4.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is less volatile compared to BNVIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check BNVIF's competition here
SMSZF vs ACMLF Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, ACMLF has a market cap of 150.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while ACMLF trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas ACMLF's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ACMLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is less volatile compared to ACMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check ACMLF's competition here
SMSZF vs ONVVF Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, ONVVF has a market cap of 122.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while ONVVF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas ONVVF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ONVVF's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to ONVVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check ONVVF's competition here
SMSZF vs CSAMF Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, CSAMF has a market cap of 98.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while CSAMF trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas CSAMF's P/E ratio is -9.64. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CSAMF's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to CSAMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check CSAMF's competition here
SMSZF vs RQHTF Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, RQHTF has a market cap of 85.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while RQHTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas RQHTF's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RQHTF's ROE of -2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is less volatile compared to RQHTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check RQHTF's competition here
SMSZF vs MDPEF Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, MDPEF has a market cap of 61.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while MDPEF trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas MDPEF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MDPEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is less volatile compared to MDPEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check MDPEF's competition here
SMSZF vs HITC Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, HITC has a market cap of 52.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while HITC trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas HITC's P/E ratio is -14.75. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HITC's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to HITC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check HITC's competition here
SMSZF vs TREIF Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, TREIF has a market cap of 33.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while TREIF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas TREIF's P/E ratio is -3.19. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TREIF's ROE of -9.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to TREIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check TREIF's competition here
SMSZF vs RTNXF Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, RTNXF has a market cap of 22.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while RTNXF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas RTNXF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RTNXF's ROE of +1.94%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is less volatile compared to RTNXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check RTNXF's competition here
SMSZF vs VASO Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, VASO has a market cap of 21.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while VASO trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas VASO's P/E ratio is 12.28. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VASO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to VASO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check VASO's competition here
SMSZF vs HDSLF Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, HDSLF has a market cap of 21.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while HDSLF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas HDSLF's P/E ratio is -3.22. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HDSLF's ROE of -1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to HDSLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check HDSLF's competition here
SMSZF vs DGNOF Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, DGNOF has a market cap of 19M. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while DGNOF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas DGNOF's P/E ratio is -4.67. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DGNOF's ROE of +4.77%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to DGNOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check DGNOF's competition here
SMSZF vs THKKF Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, THKKF has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while THKKF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas THKKF's P/E ratio is -1.51. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to THKKF's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to THKKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check THKKF's competition here
SMSZF vs MDBIF Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, MDBIF has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while MDBIF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas MDBIF's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MDBIF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is less volatile compared to MDBIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check MDBIF's competition here
SMSZF vs MNNDF Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, MNNDF has a market cap of 14.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while MNNDF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas MNNDF's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MNNDF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to MNNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check MNNDF's competition here
SMSZF vs PBSV Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, PBSV has a market cap of 13.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while PBSV trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas PBSV's P/E ratio is -60.00. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PBSV's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to PBSV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check PBSV's competition here
SMSZF vs UDOCF Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, UDOCF has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while UDOCF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas UDOCF's P/E ratio is -2.21. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UDOCF's ROE of +6.57%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to UDOCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check UDOCF's competition here
SMSZF vs CRVW Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, CRVW has a market cap of 11.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while CRVW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas CRVW's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CRVW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is less volatile compared to CRVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check CRVW's competition here
SMSZF vs CDXFF Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, CDXFF has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while CDXFF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas CDXFF's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CDXFF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to CDXFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check CDXFF's competition here
SMSZF vs HSCHF Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, HSCHF has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while HSCHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas HSCHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HSCHF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to HSCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check HSCHF's competition here
SMSZF vs VYND Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, VYND has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while VYND trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas VYND's P/E ratio is -49.99. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VYND's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to VYND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check VYND's competition here
SMSZF vs HBCNF Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, HBCNF has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while HBCNF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas HBCNF's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HBCNF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to HBCNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check HBCNF's competition here
SMSZF vs CMHSF Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, CMHSF has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while CMHSF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas CMHSF's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CMHSF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to CMHSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check CMHSF's competition here
SMSZF vs SPLTF Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, SPLTF has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while SPLTF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas SPLTF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SPLTF's ROE of -6.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is less volatile compared to SPLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check SPLTF's competition here
SMSZF vs EMOR Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, EMOR has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while EMOR trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas EMOR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EMOR's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is less volatile compared to EMOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check EMOR's competition here
SMSZF vs CRBKF Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, CRBKF has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while CRBKF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas CRBKF's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CRBKF's ROE of +68.80%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to CRBKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check CRBKF's competition here
SMSZF vs DOCRF Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, DOCRF has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while DOCRF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas DOCRF's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DOCRF's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to DOCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check DOCRF's competition here
SMSZF vs AIMLF Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, AIMLF has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while AIMLF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas AIMLF's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AIMLF's ROE of -11.81%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to AIMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check AIMLF's competition here
SMSZF vs CMPD Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, CMPD has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while CMPD trades at $4.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas CMPD's P/E ratio is -16.89. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CMPD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to CMPD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check CMPD's competition here
SMSZF vs CSOC Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, CSOC has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while CSOC trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas CSOC's P/E ratio is 0.29. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CSOC's ROE of -2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to CSOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check CSOC's competition here
SMSZF vs CNONF Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, CNONF has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while CNONF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas CNONF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CNONF's ROE of +1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is less volatile compared to CNONF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check CNONF's competition here
SMSZF vs RYAHF Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, RYAHF has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while RYAHF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas RYAHF's P/E ratio is 0.25. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RYAHF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to RYAHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check RYAHF's competition here
SMSZF vs IQAIF Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, IQAIF has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while IQAIF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas IQAIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IQAIF's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to IQAIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check IQAIF's competition here
SMSZF vs CBDS Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, CBDS has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while CBDS trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas CBDS's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CBDS's ROE of +1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to CBDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check CBDS's competition here
SMSZF vs EBYH Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, EBYH has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while EBYH trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas EBYH's P/E ratio is -5.35. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EBYH's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to EBYH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check EBYH's competition here
SMSZF vs MITI Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, MITI has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while MITI trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas MITI's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MITI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is less volatile compared to MITI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check MITI's competition here
SMSZF vs CTVEF Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, CTVEF has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while CTVEF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas CTVEF's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CTVEF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to CTVEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check CTVEF's competition here
SMSZF vs DTRK Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, DTRK has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while DTRK trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas DTRK's P/E ratio is -3.27. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DTRK's ROE of -9.79%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to DTRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check DTRK's competition here
SMSZF vs PPJE Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, PPJE has a market cap of 920.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while PPJE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas PPJE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PPJE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is less volatile compared to PPJE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check PPJE's competition here
SMSZF vs MDXL Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, MDXL has a market cap of 801K. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while MDXL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas MDXL's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MDXL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to MDXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check MDXL's competition here
SMSZF vs LVCE Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, LVCE has a market cap of 782.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while LVCE trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas LVCE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LVCE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to LVCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check LVCE's competition here
SMSZF vs EKGGF Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, EKGGF has a market cap of 772.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while EKGGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas EKGGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EKGGF's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is less volatile compared to EKGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check EKGGF's competition here
SMSZF vs EVAHF Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, EVAHF has a market cap of 685.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while EVAHF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas EVAHF's P/E ratio is -1.97. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EVAHF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to EVAHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check EVAHF's competition here
SMSZF vs NEWUF Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, NEWUF has a market cap of 625.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while NEWUF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas NEWUF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NEWUF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to NEWUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check NEWUF's competition here
SMSZF vs MDNWF Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, MDNWF has a market cap of 517.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while MDNWF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas MDNWF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MDNWF's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is less volatile compared to MDNWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check MDNWF's competition here
SMSZF vs MDRM Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, MDRM has a market cap of 510.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while MDRM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas MDRM's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MDRM's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to MDRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check MDRM's competition here
SMSZF vs NDATF Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, NDATF has a market cap of 450.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while NDATF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas NDATF's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NDATF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to NDATF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check NDATF's competition here
SMSZF vs ACHKF Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, ACHKF has a market cap of 377.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while ACHKF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas ACHKF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ACHKF's ROE of +2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to ACHKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check ACHKF's competition here
SMSZF vs TSTTF Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, TSTTF has a market cap of 332.9K. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while TSTTF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas TSTTF's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TSTTF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is less volatile compared to TSTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check TSTTF's competition here
SMSZF vs NHIQ Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, NHIQ has a market cap of 329.7K. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while NHIQ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas NHIQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NHIQ's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to NHIQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check NHIQ's competition here
SMSZF vs LFCOF Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, LFCOF has a market cap of 282K. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while LFCOF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas LFCOF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LFCOF's ROE of +8.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is less volatile compared to LFCOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check LFCOF's competition here
SMSZF vs EWLL Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, EWLL has a market cap of 185.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while EWLL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas EWLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EWLL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is less volatile compared to EWLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check EWLL's competition here
SMSZF vs DSOL Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, DSOL has a market cap of 177.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while DSOL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas DSOL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DSOL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to DSOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check DSOL's competition here
SMSZF vs ALDNF Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, ALDNF has a market cap of 160.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while ALDNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas ALDNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ALDNF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to ALDNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check ALDNF's competition here
SMSZF vs USPS Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, USPS has a market cap of 158.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while USPS trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas USPS's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to USPS's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to USPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check USPS's competition here
SMSZF vs EMYSF Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, EMYSF has a market cap of 151.7K. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while EMYSF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas EMYSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EMYSF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is less volatile compared to EMYSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check EMYSF's competition here
SMSZF vs PASO Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, PASO has a market cap of 74.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while PASO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas PASO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PASO's ROE of +6.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to PASO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check PASO's competition here
SMSZF vs REFG Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, REFG has a market cap of 60.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while REFG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas REFG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to REFG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to REFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check REFG's competition here
SMSZF vs HDVY Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, HDVY has a market cap of 41.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while HDVY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas HDVY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HDVY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to HDVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check HDVY's competition here
SMSZF vs RVRC Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, RVRC has a market cap of 40.7K. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while RVRC trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas RVRC's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RVRC's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to RVRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check RVRC's competition here
SMSZF vs IGRW Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, IGRW has a market cap of 39.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while IGRW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas IGRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IGRW's ROE of -2.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is less volatile compared to IGRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check IGRW's competition here
SMSZF vs WMGR Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, WMGR has a market cap of 36.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while WMGR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas WMGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WMGR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to WMGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check WMGR's competition here
SMSZF vs SSYNF Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, SSYNF has a market cap of 33.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while SSYNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas SSYNF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SSYNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to SSYNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check SSYNF's competition here
SMSZF vs SOFE Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, SOFE has a market cap of 31K. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while SOFE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas SOFE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SOFE's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to SOFE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check SOFE's competition here
SMSZF vs TTBLF Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, TTBLF has a market cap of 26.7K. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while TTBLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas TTBLF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TTBLF's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is less volatile compared to TTBLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check TTBLF's competition here
SMSZF vs NHEL Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, NHEL has a market cap of 16.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while NHEL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas NHEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NHEL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to NHEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check NHEL's competition here
SMSZF vs FDBH Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, FDBH has a market cap of 15K. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while FDBH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas FDBH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FDBH's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to FDBH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check FDBH's competition here
SMSZF vs ORHB Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, ORHB has a market cap of 12.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while ORHB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas ORHB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ORHB's ROE of +1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to ORHB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check ORHB's competition here
SMSZF vs HLTT Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, HLTT has a market cap of 10.7K. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while HLTT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas HLTT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HLTT's ROE of +1789941.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to HLTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check HLTT's competition here
SMSZF vs CGNSF Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, CGNSF has a market cap of 9K. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while CGNSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas CGNSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CGNSF's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is less volatile compared to CGNSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check CGNSF's competition here
SMSZF vs MOSTQ Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, MOSTQ has a market cap of 8.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while MOSTQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas MOSTQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MOSTQ's ROE of +2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to MOSTQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check MOSTQ's competition here
SMSZF vs ACNV Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, ACNV has a market cap of 8.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while ACNV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas ACNV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ACNV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to ACNV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check ACNV's competition here
SMSZF vs AHGIF Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, AHGIF has a market cap of 7.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while AHGIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas AHGIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AHGIF's ROE of -2.79%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is less volatile compared to AHGIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check AHGIF's competition here
SMSZF vs ICCO Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, ICCO has a market cap of 4K. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while ICCO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas ICCO's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ICCO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is less volatile compared to ICCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check ICCO's competition here
SMSZF vs NMXS Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, NMXS has a market cap of 3.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while NMXS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas NMXS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NMXS's ROE of -2.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to NMXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check NMXS's competition here
SMSZF vs BBLNF Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, BBLNF has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while BBLNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas BBLNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BBLNF's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to BBLNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check BBLNF's competition here
SMSZF vs ETAOF Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, ETAOF has a market cap of 1.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while ETAOF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas ETAOF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ETAOF's ROE of -13.69%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to ETAOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check ETAOF's competition here
SMSZF vs PCYS Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, PCYS has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while PCYS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas PCYS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PCYS's ROE of -2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is less volatile compared to PCYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check PCYS's competition here
SMSZF vs OLMM Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, OLMM has a market cap of 1K. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while OLMM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas OLMM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OLMM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is less volatile compared to OLMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check OLMM's competition here
SMSZF vs LGBI Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, LGBI has a market cap of 50. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while LGBI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas LGBI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LGBI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is less volatile compared to LGBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check LGBI's competition here
SMSZF vs APYI Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, APYI has a market cap of 34. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while APYI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas APYI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to APYI's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to APYI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check APYI's competition here
SMSZF vs WTEQF Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, WTEQF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while WTEQF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas WTEQF's P/E ratio is 1.78. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WTEQF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to WTEQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check WTEQF's competition here
SMSZF vs VMCS Comparison August 2025
SMSZF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSZF stands at 705.3M. In comparison, VMCS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SMSZF is priced at $8.56, while VMCS trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSZF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas VMCS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMSZF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VMCS's ROE of +3.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSZF is more volatile compared to VMCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSZF.Check VMCS's competition here