Sompo Holdings, Inc.
Sompo Holdings, Inc. SMPNY Peers
See (SMPNY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMPNY | $14.96 | -2.35% | 55.6B | 10.18 | $1.47 | N/A |
| TKOMF | $43.61 | +2.59% | 83.9B | 11.63 | $3.75 | +2.65% |
| TKOMY | $40.56 | -1.43% | 78B | 11.27 | $3.60 | +1.00% |
| PINXF | $0.72 | +4.55% | 48.8B | 5.52 | $0.13 | +4.26% |
| PPCCY | $47.35 | -1.08% | 42.2B | 9.30 | $5.09 | +0.71% |
| PPCCF | $1.89 | -5.97% | 42B | 9.45 | $0.20 | +0.72% |
| IFTPF | $20.47 | N/A | 40.6B | N/A | N/A | +7.90% |
| IFCZF | $225.30 | -2.07% | 40.2B | 24.87 | $9.06 | +1.62% |
| FRFHF | $1,775.00 | +0.28% | 40.2B | 10.29 | $172.49 | +0.85% |
| FAXXF | $16.15 | -6.32% | 39.2B | 0.16 | $99.31 | +7.21% |
Stock Comparison
SMPNY vs TKOMF Comparison
SMPNY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMPNY stands at 55.6B. In comparison, TKOMF has a market cap of 83.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMPNY is priced at $14.96, while TKOMF trades at $43.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.18, whereas TKOMF's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, SMPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TKOMF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SMPNY is more volatile compared to TKOMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMPNY.
SMPNY vs TKOMY Comparison
SMPNY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMPNY stands at 55.6B. In comparison, TKOMY has a market cap of 78B. Regarding current trading prices, SMPNY is priced at $14.96, while TKOMY trades at $40.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.18, whereas TKOMY's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, SMPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TKOMY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SMPNY is more volatile compared to TKOMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMPNY.
SMPNY vs PINXF Comparison
SMPNY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMPNY stands at 55.6B. In comparison, PINXF has a market cap of 48.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMPNY is priced at $14.96, while PINXF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.18, whereas PINXF's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, SMPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PINXF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SMPNY is more volatile compared to PINXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMPNY.
SMPNY vs PPCCY Comparison
SMPNY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMPNY stands at 55.6B. In comparison, PPCCY has a market cap of 42.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMPNY is priced at $14.96, while PPCCY trades at $47.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.18, whereas PPCCY's P/E ratio is 9.30. In terms of profitability, SMPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PPCCY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMPNY is more volatile compared to PPCCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMPNY.
SMPNY vs PPCCF Comparison
SMPNY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMPNY stands at 55.6B. In comparison, PPCCF has a market cap of 42B. Regarding current trading prices, SMPNY is priced at $14.96, while PPCCF trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.18, whereas PPCCF's P/E ratio is 9.45. In terms of profitability, SMPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PPCCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMPNY is more volatile compared to PPCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMPNY.
SMPNY vs IFTPF Comparison
SMPNY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMPNY stands at 55.6B. In comparison, IFTPF has a market cap of 40.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMPNY is priced at $14.96, while IFTPF trades at $20.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.18, whereas IFTPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IFTPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SMPNY is more volatile compared to IFTPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMPNY.
SMPNY vs IFCZF Comparison
SMPNY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMPNY stands at 55.6B. In comparison, IFCZF has a market cap of 40.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMPNY is priced at $14.96, while IFCZF trades at $225.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.18, whereas IFCZF's P/E ratio is 24.87. In terms of profitability, SMPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IFCZF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SMPNY is more volatile compared to IFCZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMPNY.
SMPNY vs FRFHF Comparison
SMPNY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMPNY stands at 55.6B. In comparison, FRFHF has a market cap of 40.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMPNY is priced at $14.96, while FRFHF trades at $1,775.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.18, whereas FRFHF's P/E ratio is 10.29. In terms of profitability, SMPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FRFHF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SMPNY is more volatile compared to FRFHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMPNY.
SMPNY vs FAXXF Comparison
SMPNY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMPNY stands at 55.6B. In comparison, FAXXF has a market cap of 39.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMPNY is priced at $14.96, while FAXXF trades at $16.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.18, whereas FAXXF's P/E ratio is 0.16. In terms of profitability, SMPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FAXXF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SMPNY is more volatile compared to FAXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMPNY.
SMPNY vs FRFFF Comparison
SMPNY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMPNY stands at 55.6B. In comparison, FRFFF has a market cap of 39B. Regarding current trading prices, SMPNY is priced at $14.96, while FRFFF trades at $17.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.18, whereas FRFFF's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, SMPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FRFFF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SMPNY is more volatile compared to FRFFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMPNY.
SMPNY vs FRFXF Comparison
SMPNY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMPNY stands at 55.6B. In comparison, FRFXF has a market cap of 38.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMPNY is priced at $14.96, while FRFXF trades at $16.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.18, whereas FRFXF's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, SMPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FRFXF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SMPNY is more volatile compared to FRFXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMPNY.
SMPNY vs PINXY Comparison
SMPNY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMPNY stands at 55.6B. In comparison, PINXY has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMPNY is priced at $14.96, while PINXY trades at $9.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.18, whereas PINXY's P/E ratio is 3.83. In terms of profitability, SMPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PINXY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SMPNY is more volatile compared to PINXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMPNY.
SMPNY vs MSADF Comparison
SMPNY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMPNY stands at 55.6B. In comparison, MSADF has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMPNY is priced at $14.96, while MSADF trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.18, whereas MSADF's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, SMPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MSADF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMPNY is more volatile compared to MSADF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMPNY.
SMPNY vs MSADY Comparison
SMPNY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMPNY stands at 55.6B. In comparison, MSADY has a market cap of 33.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMPNY is priced at $14.96, while MSADY trades at $22.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.18, whereas MSADY's P/E ratio is 7.35. In terms of profitability, SMPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MSADY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMPNY is more volatile compared to MSADY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMPNY.
SMPNY vs NHOLF Comparison
SMPNY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMPNY stands at 55.6B. In comparison, NHOLF has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMPNY is priced at $14.96, while NHOLF trades at $28.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.18, whereas NHOLF's P/E ratio is 9.43. In terms of profitability, SMPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NHOLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMPNY is more volatile compared to NHOLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMPNY.
SMPNY vs QBIEY Comparison
SMPNY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMPNY stands at 55.6B. In comparison, QBIEY has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMPNY is priced at $14.96, while QBIEY trades at $14.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.18, whereas QBIEY's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, SMPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to QBIEY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SMPNY is less volatile compared to QBIEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMPNY.
SMPNY vs INTAF Comparison
SMPNY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMPNY stands at 55.6B. In comparison, INTAF has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMPNY is priced at $14.96, while INTAF trades at $116.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.18, whereas INTAF's P/E ratio is 13.09. In terms of profitability, SMPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to INTAF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SMPNY is less volatile compared to INTAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMPNY.
SMPNY vs QBEIF Comparison
SMPNY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMPNY stands at 55.6B. In comparison, QBEIF has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMPNY is priced at $14.96, while QBEIF trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.18, whereas QBEIF's P/E ratio is 11.34. In terms of profitability, SMPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to QBEIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMPNY is more volatile compared to QBEIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMPNY.
SMPNY vs FRFGF Comparison
SMPNY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMPNY stands at 55.6B. In comparison, FRFGF has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, SMPNY is priced at $14.96, while FRFGF trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.18, whereas FRFGF's P/E ratio is 0.16. In terms of profitability, SMPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FRFGF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SMPNY is more volatile compared to FRFGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMPNY.
SMPNY vs FXFLF Comparison
SMPNY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMPNY stands at 55.6B. In comparison, FXFLF has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMPNY is priced at $14.96, while FXFLF trades at $16.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.18, whereas FXFLF's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, SMPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FXFLF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SMPNY is more volatile compared to FXFLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMPNY.
SMPNY vs SNMYF Comparison
SMPNY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMPNY stands at 55.6B. In comparison, SNMYF has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMPNY is priced at $14.96, while SNMYF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.18, whereas SNMYF's P/E ratio is 21.74. In terms of profitability, SMPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SNMYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMPNY is more volatile compared to SNMYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMPNY.
SMPNY vs SNMCY Comparison
SMPNY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMPNY stands at 55.6B. In comparison, SNMCY has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMPNY is priced at $14.96, while SNMCY trades at $13.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.18, whereas SNMCY's P/E ratio is 19.59. In terms of profitability, SMPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SNMCY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMPNY is more volatile compared to SNMCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMPNY.
SMPNY vs AMIGY Comparison
SMPNY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMPNY stands at 55.6B. In comparison, AMIGY has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMPNY is priced at $14.96, while AMIGY trades at $45.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.18, whereas AMIGY's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, SMPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AMIGY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SMPNY is more volatile compared to AMIGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMPNY.
SMPNY vs AMIGF Comparison
SMPNY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMPNY stands at 55.6B. In comparison, AMIGF has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMPNY is priced at $14.96, while AMIGF trades at $44.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.18, whereas AMIGF's P/E ratio is 15.31. In terms of profitability, SMPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AMIGF's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SMPNY is more volatile compared to AMIGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMPNY.
SMPNY vs IAUGY Comparison
SMPNY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMPNY stands at 55.6B. In comparison, IAUGY has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMPNY is priced at $14.96, while IAUGY trades at $27.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.18, whereas IAUGY's P/E ratio is 16.26. In terms of profitability, SMPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IAUGY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SMPNY is more volatile compared to IAUGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMPNY.
SMPNY vs PZAKY Comparison
SMPNY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMPNY stands at 55.6B. In comparison, PZAKY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMPNY is priced at $14.96, while PZAKY trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.18, whereas PZAKY's P/E ratio is 8.07. In terms of profitability, SMPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PZAKY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SMPNY is more volatile compared to PZAKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMPNY.
SMPNY vs PWZYF Comparison
SMPNY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMPNY stands at 55.6B. In comparison, PWZYF has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMPNY is priced at $14.96, while PWZYF trades at $11.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.18, whereas PWZYF's P/E ratio is 7.88. In terms of profitability, SMPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PWZYF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SMPNY is more volatile compared to PWZYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMPNY.
SMPNY vs IAUGF Comparison
SMPNY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMPNY stands at 55.6B. In comparison, IAUGF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMPNY is priced at $14.96, while IAUGF trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.18, whereas IAUGF's P/E ratio is 12.12. In terms of profitability, SMPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IAUGF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SMPNY is more volatile compared to IAUGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMPNY.
SMPNY vs BZLYF Comparison
SMPNY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMPNY stands at 55.6B. In comparison, BZLYF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMPNY is priced at $14.96, while BZLYF trades at $12.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.18, whereas BZLYF's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, SMPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BZLYF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SMPNY is more volatile compared to BZLYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMPNY.
SMPNY vs HCXLF Comparison
SMPNY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMPNY stands at 55.6B. In comparison, HCXLF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMPNY is priced at $14.96, while HCXLF trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.18, whereas HCXLF's P/E ratio is 8.81. In terms of profitability, SMPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HCXLF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SMPNY is more volatile compared to HCXLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMPNY.
SMPNY vs HCXLY Comparison
SMPNY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMPNY stands at 55.6B. In comparison, HCXLY has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMPNY is priced at $14.96, while HCXLY trades at $33.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.18, whereas HCXLY's P/E ratio is 9.47. In terms of profitability, SMPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HCXLY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SMPNY is more volatile compared to HCXLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMPNY.
SMPNY vs IFZZF Comparison
SMPNY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMPNY stands at 55.6B. In comparison, IFZZF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMPNY is priced at $14.96, while IFZZF trades at $20.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.18, whereas IFZZF's P/E ratio is 2.36. In terms of profitability, SMPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IFZZF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SMPNY is more volatile compared to IFZZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMPNY.
SMPNY vs ZZHGF Comparison
SMPNY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMPNY stands at 55.6B. In comparison, ZZHGF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMPNY is priced at $14.96, while ZZHGF trades at $2.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.18, whereas ZZHGF's P/E ratio is 41.83. In terms of profitability, SMPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ZZHGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMPNY is more volatile compared to ZZHGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMPNY.
SMPNY vs INFFF Comparison
SMPNY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMPNY stands at 55.6B. In comparison, INFFF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMPNY is priced at $14.96, while INFFF trades at $18.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.18, whereas INFFF's P/E ratio is 2.11. In terms of profitability, SMPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to INFFF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SMPNY is more volatile compared to INFFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMPNY.
SMPNY vs AFSIC Comparison
SMPNY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMPNY stands at 55.6B. In comparison, AFSIC has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMPNY is priced at $14.96, while AFSIC trades at $15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.18, whereas AFSIC's P/E ratio is 15.61. In terms of profitability, SMPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AFSIC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMPNY is more volatile compared to AFSIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMPNY.
SMPNY vs QUCOF Comparison
SMPNY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMPNY stands at 55.6B. In comparison, QUCOF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMPNY is priced at $14.96, while QUCOF trades at $7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.18, whereas QUCOF's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, SMPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to QUCOF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SMPNY is more volatile compared to QUCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMPNY.
SMPNY vs AFSIB Comparison
SMPNY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMPNY stands at 55.6B. In comparison, AFSIB has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMPNY is priced at $14.96, while AFSIB trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.18, whereas AFSIB's P/E ratio is 14.84. In terms of profitability, SMPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AFSIB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMPNY is more volatile compared to AFSIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMPNY.
SMPNY vs AFSIP Comparison
SMPNY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMPNY stands at 55.6B. In comparison, AFSIP has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMPNY is priced at $14.96, while AFSIP trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.18, whereas AFSIP's P/E ratio is 14.84. In terms of profitability, SMPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AFSIP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMPNY is more volatile compared to AFSIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMPNY.
SMPNY vs AFSIN Comparison
SMPNY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMPNY stands at 55.6B. In comparison, AFSIN has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMPNY is priced at $14.96, while AFSIN trades at $13.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.18, whereas AFSIN's P/E ratio is 14.23. In terms of profitability, SMPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AFSIN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMPNY is more volatile compared to AFSIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMPNY.
SMPNY vs AFSIM Comparison
SMPNY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMPNY stands at 55.6B. In comparison, AFSIM has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMPNY is priced at $14.96, while AFSIM trades at $13.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.18, whereas AFSIM's P/E ratio is 14.19. In terms of profitability, SMPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AFSIM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMPNY is less volatile compared to AFSIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMPNY.
SMPNY vs AFSIA Comparison
SMPNY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMPNY stands at 55.6B. In comparison, AFSIA has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMPNY is priced at $14.96, while AFSIA trades at $13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.18, whereas AFSIA's P/E ratio is 13.92. In terms of profitability, SMPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AFSIA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMPNY is more volatile compared to AFSIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMPNY.
SMPNY vs ZZHGY Comparison
SMPNY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMPNY stands at 55.6B. In comparison, ZZHGY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMPNY is priced at $14.96, while ZZHGY trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.18, whereas ZZHGY's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, SMPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ZZHGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMPNY is more volatile compared to ZZHGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMPNY.
SMPNY vs LNDAF Comparison
SMPNY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMPNY stands at 55.6B. In comparison, LNDAF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMPNY is priced at $14.96, while LNDAF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.18, whereas LNDAF's P/E ratio is 22.14. In terms of profitability, SMPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LNDAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMPNY is more volatile compared to LNDAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMPNY.
SMPNY vs DIISY Comparison
SMPNY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMPNY stands at 55.6B. In comparison, DIISY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMPNY is priced at $14.96, while DIISY trades at $16.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.18, whereas DIISY's P/E ratio is 27.10. In terms of profitability, SMPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DIISY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMPNY is more volatile compared to DIISY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMPNY.
SMPNY vs FFHPF Comparison
SMPNY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMPNY stands at 55.6B. In comparison, FFHPF has a market cap of 396.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SMPNY is priced at $14.96, while FFHPF trades at $17.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.18, whereas FFHPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FFHPF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SMPNY is more volatile compared to FFHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMPNY.
SMPNY vs FXFHF Comparison
SMPNY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMPNY stands at 55.6B. In comparison, FXFHF has a market cap of 388M. Regarding current trading prices, SMPNY is priced at $14.96, while FXFHF trades at $17.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.18, whereas FXFHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FXFHF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SMPNY is less volatile compared to FXFHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMPNY.
SMPNY vs FAXRF Comparison
SMPNY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMPNY stands at 55.6B. In comparison, FAXRF has a market cap of 305.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SMPNY is priced at $14.96, while FAXRF trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.18, whereas FAXRF's P/E ratio is 0.14. In terms of profitability, SMPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FAXRF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SMPNY is less volatile compared to FAXRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMPNY.
SMPNY vs EGFHF Comparison
SMPNY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMPNY stands at 55.6B. In comparison, EGFHF has a market cap of 44.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SMPNY is priced at $14.96, while EGFHF trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.18, whereas EGFHF's P/E ratio is 10.07. In terms of profitability, SMPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EGFHF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMPNY is more volatile compared to EGFHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMPNY.
SMPNY vs FIGP Comparison
SMPNY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMPNY stands at 55.6B. In comparison, FIGP has a market cap of 21.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMPNY is priced at $14.96, while FIGP trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.18, whereas FIGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FIGP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMPNY is less volatile compared to FIGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMPNY.
SMPNY vs SBBG Comparison
SMPNY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMPNY stands at 55.6B. In comparison, SBBG has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SMPNY is priced at $14.96, while SBBG trades at $405.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.18, whereas SBBG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SBBG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMPNY is less volatile compared to SBBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMPNY.
SMPNY vs SGYI Comparison
SMPNY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMPNY stands at 55.6B. In comparison, SGYI has a market cap of 6.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SMPNY is priced at $14.96, while SGYI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.18, whereas SGYI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SGYI's ROE of +40.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SMPNY is more volatile compared to SGYI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMPNY.
SMPNY vs AFHIF Comparison
SMPNY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMPNY stands at 55.6B. In comparison, AFHIF has a market cap of 1.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SMPNY is priced at $14.96, while AFHIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.18, whereas AFHIF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SMPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AFHIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMPNY is less volatile compared to AFHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMPNY.
SMPNY vs MAJCQ Comparison
SMPNY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMPNY stands at 55.6B. In comparison, MAJCQ has a market cap of 19. Regarding current trading prices, SMPNY is priced at $14.96, while MAJCQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.18, whereas MAJCQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MAJCQ's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SMPNY is more volatile compared to MAJCQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMPNY.
SMPNY vs FNHCQ Comparison
SMPNY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMPNY stands at 55.6B. In comparison, FNHCQ has a market cap of 18. Regarding current trading prices, SMPNY is priced at $14.96, while FNHCQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.18, whereas FNHCQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SMPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FNHCQ's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, SMPNY is more volatile compared to FNHCQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMPNY.
SMPNY vs AFHIQ Comparison
SMPNY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMPNY stands at 55.6B. In comparison, AFHIQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SMPNY is priced at $14.96, while AFHIQ trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.18, whereas AFHIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AFHIQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMPNY is less volatile compared to AFHIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMPNY.