Shimano Inc.
Shimano Inc. SMNNY Peers
See (SMNNY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Leisure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMNNY | $14.46 | +0.00% | 12.4B | 29.46 | $0.48 | N/A |
| NCBDY | $17.91 | +0.00% | 45.8B | 19.71 | $0.89 | +0.75% |
| OLCLF | $23.00 | +0.00% | 38.9B | 45.65 | $0.52 | +0.23% |
| OLCLY | $22.97 | -0.01% | 36.4B | 42.66 | $0.52 | +0.35% |
| CUKPF | $25.19 | +13.78% | 36.3B | 16.25 | $1.55 | N/A |
| ANPDY | $300.82 | +0.00% | 33.8B | 16.09 | $18.82 | +2.49% |
| ANPDF | $11.65 | +0.00% | 32.3B | 15.53 | $0.75 | +2.60% |
| NCBDF | $32.20 | +0.00% | 21.7B | 19.04 | $1.79 | +1.40% |
| SHMDF | $149.32 | +0.00% | 13B | 30.97 | $4.82 | +1.39% |
| GMWKF | $223.00 | +0.00% | 7.5B | 31.88 | $7.12 | +2.89% |
Stock Comparison
SMNNY vs NCBDY Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, NCBDY has a market cap of 45.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while NCBDY trades at $17.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas NCBDY's P/E ratio is 19.71. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NCBDY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to NCBDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs OLCLF Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, OLCLF has a market cap of 38.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while OLCLF trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas OLCLF's P/E ratio is 45.65. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OLCLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to OLCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs OLCLY Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, OLCLY has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while OLCLY trades at $22.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas OLCLY's P/E ratio is 42.66. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OLCLY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is less volatile compared to OLCLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs CUKPF Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, CUKPF has a market cap of 36.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while CUKPF trades at $25.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas CUKPF's P/E ratio is 16.25. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CUKPF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is less volatile compared to CUKPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs ANPDY Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, ANPDY has a market cap of 33.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while ANPDY trades at $300.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas ANPDY's P/E ratio is 16.09. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ANPDY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is less volatile compared to ANPDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs ANPDF Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, ANPDF has a market cap of 32.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while ANPDF trades at $11.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas ANPDF's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ANPDF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to ANPDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs NCBDF Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, NCBDF has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while NCBDF trades at $32.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas NCBDF's P/E ratio is 19.04. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NCBDF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to NCBDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs SHMDF Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, SHMDF has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while SHMDF trades at $149.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas SHMDF's P/E ratio is 30.97. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHMDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to SHMDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs GMWKF Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, GMWKF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while GMWKF trades at $223.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas GMWKF's P/E ratio is 31.88. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GMWKF's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is less volatile compared to GMWKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs THUPY Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, THUPY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while THUPY trades at $13.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas THUPY's P/E ratio is 26.26. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to THUPY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to THUPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs LNNGY Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, LNNGY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while LNNGY trades at $54.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas LNNGY's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LNNGY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is less volatile compared to LNNGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs LNNGF Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, LNNGF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while LNNGF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas LNNGF's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LNNGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to LNNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs NINOF Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, NINOF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while NINOF trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas NINOF's P/E ratio is 90.83. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NINOF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to NINOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs YAMCF Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, YAMCF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while YAMCF trades at $7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas YAMCF's P/E ratio is 37.89. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to YAMCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to YAMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs NINOY Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, NINOY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while NINOY trades at $10.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas NINOY's P/E ratio is 82.50. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NINOY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is less volatile compared to NINOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs YAMCY Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, YAMCY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while YAMCY trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas YAMCY's P/E ratio is 37.05. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to YAMCY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to YAMCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs THLPF Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, THLPF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while THLPF trades at $32.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas THLPF's P/E ratio is 26.17. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to THLPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to THLPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs TCCHF Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, TCCHF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while TCCHF trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas TCCHF's P/E ratio is 27.45. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TCCHF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to TCCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs TOMYY Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, TOMYY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while TOMYY trades at $29.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas TOMYY's P/E ratio is 20.39. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TOMYY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to TOMYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs SNMSF Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, SNMSF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while SNMSF trades at $16.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas SNMSF's P/E ratio is 15.92. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SNMSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to SNMSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs RNDOF Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, RNDOF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while RNDOF trades at $9.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas RNDOF's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RNDOF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to RNDOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs YONXF Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, YONXF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while YONXF trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas YONXF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to YONXF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to YONXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs BSFFF Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, BSFFF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while BSFFF trades at $22.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas BSFFF's P/E ratio is 147.43. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BSFFF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to BSFFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs DTCGF Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, DTCGF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while DTCGF trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas DTCGF's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DTCGF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to DTCGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs MPZAF Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, MPZAF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while MPZAF trades at $44.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas MPZAF's P/E ratio is 75.59. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MPZAF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to MPZAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs CLPIF Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, CLPIF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while CLPIF trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas CLPIF's P/E ratio is 9.20. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CLPIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to CLPIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs HRVFF Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, HRVFF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while HRVFF trades at $58.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas HRVFF's P/E ratio is 35.33. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HRVFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to HRVFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs HISJF Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, HISJF has a market cap of 978.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while HISJF trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas HISJF's P/E ratio is -54.54. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HISJF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to HISJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs DRMMF Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, DRMMF has a market cap of 850.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while DRMMF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas DRMMF's P/E ratio is 3.33. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DRMMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to DRMMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs TNIEF Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, TNIEF has a market cap of 760.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while TNIEF trades at $6.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas TNIEF's P/E ratio is 55.58. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TNIEF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to TNIEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs MPZAY Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, MPZAY has a market cap of 758.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while MPZAY trades at $14.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas MPZAY's P/E ratio is 33.30. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MPZAY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to MPZAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs BTEAF Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, BTEAF has a market cap of 740.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while BTEAF trades at $9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas BTEAF's P/E ratio is 21.40. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BTEAF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to BTEAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs CTVIF Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, CTVIF has a market cap of 725.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while CTVIF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas CTVIF's P/E ratio is 13.10. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CTVIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to CTVIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs VVCHF Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, VVCHF has a market cap of 669M. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while VVCHF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas VVCHF's P/E ratio is 6.71. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VVCHF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to VVCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs UETMF Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, UETMF has a market cap of 622.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while UETMF trades at $7.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas UETMF's P/E ratio is -3.39. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UETMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to UETMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs SHOFF Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, SHOFF has a market cap of 549.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while SHOFF trades at $10.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas SHOFF's P/E ratio is 6.19. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHOFF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to SHOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs CLKXF Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, CLKXF has a market cap of 422.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while CLKXF trades at $17.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas CLKXF's P/E ratio is 13.75. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CLKXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to CLKXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs OQLGF Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, OQLGF has a market cap of 376.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while OQLGF trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas OQLGF's P/E ratio is -4.26. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OQLGF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to OQLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs GYYMF Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, GYYMF has a market cap of 352.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while GYYMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas GYYMF's P/E ratio is 66.67. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GYYMF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to GYYMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs GBBYF Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, GBBYF has a market cap of 288.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while GBBYF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas GBBYF's P/E ratio is 5.76. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GBBYF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to GBBYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs FOCIF Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, FOCIF has a market cap of 146.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while FOCIF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas FOCIF's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FOCIF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to FOCIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs PYHOF Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, PYHOF has a market cap of 134.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while PYHOF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas PYHOF's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PYHOF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to PYHOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs RPNMF Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, RPNMF has a market cap of 111.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while RPNMF trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas RPNMF's P/E ratio is -26.00. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RPNMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to RPNMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs CGROF Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, CGROF has a market cap of 92.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while CGROF trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas CGROF's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CGROF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to CGROF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs KICK Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, KICK has a market cap of 85.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while KICK trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas KICK's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KICK's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to KICK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs BOLL Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, BOLL has a market cap of 74M. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while BOLL trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas BOLL's P/E ratio is 0.33. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BOLL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to BOLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs PMTYF Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, PMTYF has a market cap of 59M. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while PMTYF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas PMTYF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PMTYF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to PMTYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs GFIZF Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, GFIZF has a market cap of 45M. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while GFIZF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas GFIZF's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GFIZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to GFIZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs CNLFF Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, CNLFF has a market cap of 39.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while CNLFF trades at $2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas CNLFF's P/E ratio is -7.62. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNLFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to CNLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs PRKA Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, PRKA has a market cap of 26.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while PRKA trades at $35.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas PRKA's P/E ratio is 47.30. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PRKA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to PRKA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs KENS Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, KENS has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while KENS trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas KENS's P/E ratio is -26.80. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KENS's ROE of +5.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to KENS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs DSHK Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, DSHK has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while DSHK trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas DSHK's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DSHK's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is less volatile compared to DSHK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs PFFEF Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, PFFEF has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while PFFEF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas PFFEF's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PFFEF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to PFFEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs VIRA Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, VIRA has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while VIRA trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas VIRA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VIRA's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to VIRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs TOYRF Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, TOYRF has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while TOYRF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas TOYRF's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TOYRF's ROE of +1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to TOYRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs BWMG Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, BWMG has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while BWMG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas BWMG's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BWMG's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to BWMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs GTHKF Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, GTHKF has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while GTHKF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas GTHKF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GTHKF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to GTHKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs QRSM Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, QRSM has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while QRSM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas QRSM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to QRSM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to QRSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs BTDG Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, BTDG has a market cap of 789.9K. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while BTDG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas BTDG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BTDG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is less volatile compared to BTDG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs BFXXQ Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, BFXXQ has a market cap of 351.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while BFXXQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas BFXXQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BFXXQ's ROE of +15.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to BFXXQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs SPQS Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, SPQS has a market cap of 342.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while SPQS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas SPQS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SPQS's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is less volatile compared to SPQS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs MSET Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, MSET has a market cap of 304K. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while MSET trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas MSET's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MSET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to MSET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs TRBX Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, TRBX has a market cap of 162.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while TRBX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas TRBX's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TRBX's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to TRBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs VMHG Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, VMHG has a market cap of 160K. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while VMHG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas VMHG's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VMHG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is less volatile compared to VMHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs XFTB Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, XFTB has a market cap of 103.9K. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while XFTB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas XFTB's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to XFTB's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to XFTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs VTMB Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, VTMB has a market cap of 78.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while VTMB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas VTMB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VTMB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to VTMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs ECMH Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, ECMH has a market cap of 69.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while ECMH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas ECMH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ECMH's ROE of -78.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to ECMH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs DAAT Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, DAAT has a market cap of 57.7K. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while DAAT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas DAAT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DAAT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to DAAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs ALTD Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, ALTD has a market cap of 49.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while ALTD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas ALTD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ALTD's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to ALTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs OMWS Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, OMWS has a market cap of 46.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while OMWS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas OMWS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OMWS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to OMWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs JMIH Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, JMIH has a market cap of 10K. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while JMIH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas JMIH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JMIH's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to JMIH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs GLFN Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, GLFN has a market cap of 2.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while GLFN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas GLFN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GLFN's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to GLFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs LCLP Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, LCLP has a market cap of 1.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while LCLP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas LCLP's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LCLP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to LCLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs ROCLF Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, ROCLF has a market cap of 1.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while ROCLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas ROCLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ROCLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to ROCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs PRXIQ Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, PRXIQ has a market cap of 793. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while PRXIQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas PRXIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PRXIQ's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to PRXIQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs BYDC Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, BYDC has a market cap of 201. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while BYDC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas BYDC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BYDC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to BYDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs FTFY Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, FTFY has a market cap of 3. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while FTFY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas FTFY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FTFY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to FTFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs WMGPF Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, WMGPF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while WMGPF trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas WMGPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WMGPF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to WMGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs TVPC Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, TVPC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while TVPC trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas TVPC's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TVPC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to TVPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs CLUBQ Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, CLUBQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while CLUBQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas CLUBQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CLUBQ's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to CLUBQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.
SMNNY vs CLVFA Comparison
SMNNY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMNNY stands at 12.4B. In comparison, CLVFA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SMNNY is priced at $14.46, while CLVFA trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMNNY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.46, whereas CLVFA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMNNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CLVFA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMNNY is more volatile compared to CLVFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMNNY.