Siemens Healthineers AG
Siemens Healthineers AG SMMNY Peers
See (SMMNY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Medical - Devices Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMMNY | $27.77 | +0.11% | 124B | 25.84 | $1.07 | +1.07% |
| SEMHF | $55.08 | +0.15% | 62.7B | 26.12 | $2.14 | +1.77% |
| RYLPF | $24.37 | +2.79% | 23.1B | 81.22 | $0.30 | +3.90% |
| SONVY | $59.94 | +0.39% | 18B | 27.29 | $2.21 | +1.05% |
| SONVF | $301.20 | +0.00% | 17.9B | 27.29 | $11.03 | +1.74% |
| SNNUF | $15.58 | +7.23% | 13.6B | 33.15 | $0.47 | +2.41% |
| CHEOY | $99.09 | +0.46% | 13.1B | 54.45 | $1.84 | +1.43% |
| CHEOF | $185.50 | -2.78% | 12.1B | 50.54 | $3.67 | +1.49% |
| WILYY | $21.31 | +0.00% | 9.2B | 21.09 | $1.02 | N/A |
| WILLF | $41.75 | +15.17% | 8.6B | 20.37 | $2.05 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SMMNY vs SEMHF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, SEMHF has a market cap of 62.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while SEMHF trades at $55.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas SEMHF's P/E ratio is 26.12. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SEMHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to SEMHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs RYLPF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, RYLPF has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while RYLPF trades at $24.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas RYLPF's P/E ratio is 81.22. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RYLPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to RYLPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs SONVY Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, SONVY has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while SONVY trades at $59.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas SONVY's P/E ratio is 27.29. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SONVY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to SONVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs SONVF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, SONVF has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while SONVF trades at $301.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas SONVF's P/E ratio is 27.29. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SONVF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to SONVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs SNNUF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, SNNUF has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while SNNUF trades at $15.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas SNNUF's P/E ratio is 33.15. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SNNUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to SNNUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs CHEOY Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, CHEOY has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while CHEOY trades at $99.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas CHEOY's P/E ratio is 54.45. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CHEOY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to CHEOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs CHEOF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, CHEOF has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while CHEOF trades at $185.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas CHEOF's P/E ratio is 50.54. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CHEOF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to CHEOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs WILYY Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, WILYY has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while WILYY trades at $21.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas WILYY's P/E ratio is 21.09. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WILYY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to WILYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs WILLF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, WILLF has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while WILLF trades at $41.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas WILLF's P/E ratio is 20.37. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WILLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to WILLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs GNGBY Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, GNGBY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while GNGBY trades at $20.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas GNGBY's P/E ratio is 35.46. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GNGBY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to GNGBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs GNGBF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, GNGBF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while GNGBF trades at $18.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas GNGBF's P/E ratio is 33.02. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GNGBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to GNGBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs NHNKY Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, NHNKY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while NHNKY trades at $11.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas NHNKY's P/E ratio is 22.85. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NHNKY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to NHNKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs AMBBY Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, AMBBY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while AMBBY trades at $15.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas AMBBY's P/E ratio is 74.57. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AMBBY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to AMBBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs AMBFF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, AMBFF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while AMBFF trades at $15.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas AMBFF's P/E ratio is 73.33. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AMBFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to AMBFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs NHNKF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, NHNKF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while NHNKF trades at $15.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas NHNKF's P/E ratio is 41.86. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NHNKF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to NHNKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs GNNDY Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, GNNDY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while GNNDY trades at $48.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas GNNDY's P/E ratio is 18.54. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GNNDY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to GNNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs OSSFF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, OSSFF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while OSSFF trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas OSSFF's P/E ratio is 30.00. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OSSFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to OSSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs STSEY Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, STSEY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while STSEY trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas STSEY's P/E ratio is 39.41. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STSEY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to STSEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs VTRLY Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, VTRLY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while VTRLY trades at $14.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas VTRLY's P/E ratio is 38.21. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VTRLY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to VTRLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs MCRPF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, MCRPF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while MCRPF trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas MCRPF's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MCRPF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to MCRPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs GGNDF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, GGNDF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while GGNDF trades at $14.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas GGNDF's P/E ratio is 14.26. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GGNDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to GGNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs DWRKF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, DWRKF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while DWRKF trades at $543.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas DWRKF's P/E ratio is 75.94. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DWRKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to DWRKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs OSSUY Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, OSSUY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while OSSUY trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas OSSUY's P/E ratio is 23.53. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OSSUY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to OSSUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs MEDGF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, MEDGF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while MEDGF trades at $83.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas MEDGF's P/E ratio is 33.30. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MEDGF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to MEDGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs DRWKF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, DRWKF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while DRWKF trades at $67.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas DRWKF's P/E ratio is 9.97. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DRWKF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to DRWKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs DGWPF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, DGWPF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while DGWPF trades at $57.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas DGWPF's P/E ratio is 7.81. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DGWPF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to DGWPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs ELEAF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, ELEAF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while ELEAF trades at $12.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas ELEAF's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ELEAF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to ELEAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs XVIPF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, XVIPF has a market cap of 948.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while XVIPF trades at $30.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas XVIPF's P/E ratio is 65.43. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to XVIPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to XVIPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs LFTSF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, LFTSF has a market cap of 858.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while LFTSF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas LFTSF's P/E ratio is 19.50. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LFTSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to LFTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs MDRSF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, MDRSF has a market cap of 639.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while MDRSF trades at $66.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas MDRSF's P/E ratio is 151.47. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MDRSF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to MDRSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs CLVSF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, CLVSF has a market cap of 556.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while CLVSF trades at $19.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas CLVSF's P/E ratio is 38.25. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CLVSF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to CLVSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs CALZF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, CALZF has a market cap of 531.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while CALZF trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas CALZF's P/E ratio is 77.00. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CALZF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to CALZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs AVMR Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, AVMR has a market cap of 494.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while AVMR trades at $9.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas AVMR's P/E ratio is -18.34. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AVMR's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to AVMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs IOBCF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, IOBCF has a market cap of 414.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while IOBCF trades at $13.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas IOBCF's P/E ratio is 39.31. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IOBCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to IOBCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs HYBT Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, HYBT has a market cap of 361.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while HYBT trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas HYBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HYBT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to HYBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs EAPIF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, EAPIF has a market cap of 349.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while EAPIF trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas EAPIF's P/E ratio is -2.28. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EAPIF's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to EAPIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs CSSPF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, CSSPF has a market cap of 271.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while CSSPF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas CSSPF's P/E ratio is 65.00. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CSSPF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to CSSPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs CLLKF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, CLLKF has a market cap of 262.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while CLLKF trades at $3.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas CLLKF's P/E ratio is -8.44. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CLLKF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to CLLKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs CYBQY Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, CYBQY has a market cap of 257.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while CYBQY trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas CYBQY's P/E ratio is -50.50. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CYBQY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to CYBQY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs HTLZF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, HTLZF has a market cap of 245.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while HTLZF trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas HTLZF's P/E ratio is -159.01. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HTLZF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to HTLZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs BCCOY Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, BCCOY has a market cap of 221M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while BCCOY trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas BCCOY's P/E ratio is -7.27. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCCOY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to BCCOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs IMPZY Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, IMPZY has a market cap of 199.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while IMPZY trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas IMPZY's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IMPZY's ROE of -2.86%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to IMPZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs DMTRF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, DMTRF has a market cap of 193.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while DMTRF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas DMTRF's P/E ratio is -9.86. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DMTRF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to DMTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs DTXMF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, DTXMF has a market cap of 180.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while DTXMF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas DTXMF's P/E ratio is -9.52. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DTXMF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to DTXMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs CYBQF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, CYBQF has a market cap of 173.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while CYBQF trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas CYBQF's P/E ratio is -65.00. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CYBQF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to CYBQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs BRNHF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, BRNHF has a market cap of 161.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while BRNHF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas BRNHF's P/E ratio is -5.12. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BRNHF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to BRNHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs PXMBF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, PXMBF has a market cap of 154.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while PXMBF trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas PXMBF's P/E ratio is 29.17. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PXMBF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to PXMBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs EKDHF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, EKDHF has a market cap of 152.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while EKDHF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas EKDHF's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EKDHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to EKDHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs BRSYF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, BRSYF has a market cap of 128.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while BRSYF trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas BRSYF's P/E ratio is 30.91. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BRSYF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to BRSYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs VMTHF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, VMTHF has a market cap of 125.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while VMTHF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas VMTHF's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VMTHF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to VMTHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs AMEUF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, AMEUF has a market cap of 120.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while AMEUF trades at $5.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas AMEUF's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AMEUF's ROE of -5.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to AMEUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs AVHHL Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, AVHHL has a market cap of 115.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while AVHHL trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas AVHHL's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AVHHL's ROE of -3.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to AVHHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs FDMDF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, FDMDF has a market cap of 106.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while FDMDF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas FDMDF's P/E ratio is -3.26. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FDMDF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to FDMDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs JMDMF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, JMDMF has a market cap of 104.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while JMDMF trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas JMDMF's P/E ratio is -27.83. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JMDMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to JMDMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs SOMNF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, SOMNF has a market cap of 92.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while SOMNF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas SOMNF's P/E ratio is -14.20. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SOMNF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to SOMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs RSHUF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, RSHUF has a market cap of 91.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while RSHUF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas RSHUF's P/E ratio is -5.81. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RSHUF's ROE of -2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to RSHUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs SNZZF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, SNZZF has a market cap of 86.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while SNZZF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas SNZZF's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SNZZF's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to SNZZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs CKMTF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, CKMTF has a market cap of 85.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while CKMTF trades at $12.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas CKMTF's P/E ratio is -3.32. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CKMTF's ROE of +2.58%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to CKMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs IPDQF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, IPDQF has a market cap of 66.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while IPDQF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas IPDQF's P/E ratio is -3.30. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IPDQF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to IPDQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs BLOZF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, BLOZF has a market cap of 53.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while BLOZF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas BLOZF's P/E ratio is -23.37. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BLOZF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to BLOZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs RDGL Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, RDGL has a market cap of 52.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while RDGL trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas RDGL's P/E ratio is -11.57. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RDGL's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to RDGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs TLTFF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, TLTFF has a market cap of 41.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while TLTFF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas TLTFF's P/E ratio is -16.58. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TLTFF's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to TLTFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs NVYTF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, NVYTF has a market cap of 38.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while NVYTF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas NVYTF's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NVYTF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to NVYTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs ELXMF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, ELXMF has a market cap of 28.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while ELXMF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas ELXMF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ELXMF's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to ELXMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs MKEAF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, MKEAF has a market cap of 25.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while MKEAF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas MKEAF's P/E ratio is -4.11. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MKEAF's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to MKEAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs PLLWF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, PLLWF has a market cap of 24.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while PLLWF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas PLLWF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PLLWF's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to PLLWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs KBBTF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, KBBTF has a market cap of 24.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while KBBTF trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas KBBTF's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KBBTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to KBBTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs POSC Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, POSC has a market cap of 22.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while POSC trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas POSC's P/E ratio is 0.37. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to POSC's ROE of +9.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to POSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs EMITF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, EMITF has a market cap of 22.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while EMITF trades at $2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas EMITF's P/E ratio is -14.36. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EMITF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to EMITF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs MDXHF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, MDXHF has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while MDXHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas MDXHF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MDXHF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to MDXHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs ASAPF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, ASAPF has a market cap of 18.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while ASAPF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas ASAPF's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASAPF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to ASAPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs VPTDF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, VPTDF has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while VPTDF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas VPTDF's P/E ratio is -5.55. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VPTDF's ROE of +2.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to VPTDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs GTHP Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, GTHP has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while GTHP trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas GTHP's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GTHP's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to GTHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs DIZTF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, DIZTF has a market cap of 18M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while DIZTF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas DIZTF's P/E ratio is -11.16. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DIZTF's ROE of -2.82%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to DIZTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs PYNKF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, PYNKF has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while PYNKF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas PYNKF's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PYNKF's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to PYNKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs RMSL Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, RMSL has a market cap of 14.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while RMSL trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas RMSL's P/E ratio is 0.93. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RMSL's ROE of -2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to RMSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs TMDIF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, TMDIF has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while TMDIF trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas TMDIF's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TMDIF's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to TMDIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs IMEXF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, IMEXF has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while IMEXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas IMEXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IMEXF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to IMEXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs ATBPF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, ATBPF has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while ATBPF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas ATBPF's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ATBPF's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to ATBPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs LXXGF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, LXXGF has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while LXXGF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas LXXGF's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LXXGF's ROE of -1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to LXXGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs ALRTF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, ALRTF has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while ALRTF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas ALRTF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALRTF's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to ALRTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs NGMDF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, NGMDF has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while NGMDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas NGMDF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NGMDF's ROE of +1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to NGMDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs QLIS Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, QLIS has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while QLIS trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas QLIS's P/E ratio is 2.22. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to QLIS's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to QLIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs RHNMF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, RHNMF has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while RHNMF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas RHNMF's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RHNMF's ROE of +15.91%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to RHNMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs FZMD Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, FZMD has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while FZMD trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas FZMD's P/E ratio is 1.40. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FZMD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to FZMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs VYCO Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, VYCO has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while VYCO trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas VYCO's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VYCO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to VYCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs IRME Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, IRME has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while IRME trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas IRME's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IRME's ROE of +11.77%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to IRME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs TBRIF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, TBRIF has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while TBRIF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas TBRIF's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TBRIF's ROE of -2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to TBRIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs LBLTF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, LBLTF has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while LBLTF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas LBLTF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LBLTF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to LBLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs ADMT Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, ADMT has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while ADMT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas ADMT's P/E ratio is -5.97. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ADMT's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to ADMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs NUMD Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, NUMD has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while NUMD trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas NUMD's P/E ratio is 4.71. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NUMD's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to NUMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs BIEL Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, BIEL has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while BIEL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas BIEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BIEL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to BIEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs VANIW Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, VANIW has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while VANIW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas VANIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VANIW's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to VANIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs PMEDF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, PMEDF has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while PMEDF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas PMEDF's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PMEDF's ROE of +1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to PMEDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs ODYY Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, ODYY has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while ODYY trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas ODYY's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ODYY's ROE of +5.81%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to ODYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs ESMC Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, ESMC has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while ESMC trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas ESMC's P/E ratio is 6.47. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ESMC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to ESMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs USAQ Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, USAQ has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while USAQ trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas USAQ's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USAQ's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to USAQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs KLYG Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, KLYG has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while KLYG trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas KLYG's P/E ratio is -11.50. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KLYG's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to KLYG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs CYDX Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 124B. In comparison, CYDX has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $27.77, while CYDX trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas CYDX's P/E ratio is 0.33. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CYDX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to CYDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.