Siemens Healthineers AG
Siemens Healthineers AG SMMNY Peers
See (SMMNY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Medical - Devices Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMMNY | $26.84 | +0.45% | 120.6B | 24.84 | $1.08 | +1.10% |
| SEMHF | $54.03 | -1.77% | 60.6B | 24.78 | $2.18 | +1.83% |
| RYLPF | $23.85 | +0.01% | 22.6B | 79.49 | $0.30 | +3.98% |
| SONVY | $58.51 | +1.49% | 17.4B | 25.55 | $2.29 | +1.08% |
| SONVF | $284.75 | -3.04% | 17B | 25.24 | $11.28 | +1.84% |
| CHEOY | $99.85 | +0.08% | 13.1B | 54.27 | $1.84 | +1.40% |
| SNNUF | $14.75 | +0.00% | 12.9B | 31.38 | $0.47 | +2.54% |
| CHEOF | $193.04 | -7.06% | 12.6B | 52.60 | $3.67 | +1.44% |
| WILYY | $20.19 | +0.00% | 9B | 19.41 | $1.04 | N/A |
| WILLF | $42.17 | +1.01% | 8.7B | 20.08 | $2.10 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SMMNY vs SEMHF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, SEMHF has a market cap of 60.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while SEMHF trades at $54.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas SEMHF's P/E ratio is 24.78. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SEMHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to SEMHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs RYLPF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, RYLPF has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while RYLPF trades at $23.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas RYLPF's P/E ratio is 79.49. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RYLPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to RYLPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs SONVY Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, SONVY has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while SONVY trades at $58.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas SONVY's P/E ratio is 25.55. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SONVY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to SONVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs SONVF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, SONVF has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while SONVF trades at $284.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas SONVF's P/E ratio is 25.24. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SONVF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to SONVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs CHEOY Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, CHEOY has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while CHEOY trades at $99.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas CHEOY's P/E ratio is 54.27. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CHEOY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to CHEOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs SNNUF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, SNNUF has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while SNNUF trades at $14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas SNNUF's P/E ratio is 31.38. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SNNUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to SNNUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs CHEOF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, CHEOF has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while CHEOF trades at $193.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas CHEOF's P/E ratio is 52.60. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CHEOF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to CHEOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs WILYY Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, WILYY has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while WILYY trades at $20.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas WILYY's P/E ratio is 19.41. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WILYY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to WILYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs WILLF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, WILLF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while WILLF trades at $42.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas WILLF's P/E ratio is 20.08. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WILLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to WILLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs GNGBY Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, GNGBY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while GNGBY trades at $19.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas GNGBY's P/E ratio is 35.20. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GNGBY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to GNGBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs GNGBF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, GNGBF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while GNGBF trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas GNGBF's P/E ratio is 37.50. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GNGBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to GNGBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs AMBBY Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, AMBBY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while AMBBY trades at $15.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas AMBBY's P/E ratio is 70.05. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AMBBY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to AMBBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs AMBFF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, AMBFF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while AMBFF trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas AMBFF's P/E ratio is 69.09. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AMBFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to AMBFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs NHNKY Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, NHNKY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while NHNKY trades at $12.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas NHNKY's P/E ratio is 21.34. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NHNKY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to NHNKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs NHNKF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, NHNKF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while NHNKF trades at $15.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas NHNKF's P/E ratio is 41.86. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NHNKF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to NHNKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs GNNDY Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, GNNDY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while GNNDY trades at $46.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas GNNDY's P/E ratio is 17.87. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GNNDY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to GNNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs MCRPF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, MCRPF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while MCRPF trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas MCRPF's P/E ratio is -9.92. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MCRPF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to MCRPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs GGNDF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, GGNDF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while GGNDF trades at $14.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas GGNDF's P/E ratio is 16.72. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GGNDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to GGNDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs STSEY Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, STSEY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while STSEY trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas STSEY's P/E ratio is 39.41. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STSEY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to STSEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs VTRLY Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, VTRLY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while VTRLY trades at $14.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas VTRLY's P/E ratio is 44.06. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VTRLY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to VTRLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs OSSFF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, OSSFF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while OSSFF trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas OSSFF's P/E ratio is 24.41. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OSSFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to OSSFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs DWRKF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, DWRKF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while DWRKF trades at $543.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas DWRKF's P/E ratio is 75.94. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DWRKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to DWRKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs OSSUY Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, OSSUY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while OSSUY trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas OSSUY's P/E ratio is 23.53. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OSSUY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to OSSUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs MEDGF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, MEDGF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while MEDGF trades at $83.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas MEDGF's P/E ratio is 33.30. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MEDGF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to MEDGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs DRWKF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, DRWKF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while DRWKF trades at $67.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas DRWKF's P/E ratio is 9.40. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DRWKF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to DRWKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs DGWPF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, DGWPF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while DGWPF trades at $57.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas DGWPF's P/E ratio is 8.02. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DGWPF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to DGWPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs LFTSF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, LFTSF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while LFTSF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas LFTSF's P/E ratio is 23.35. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LFTSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to LFTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs ELEAF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, ELEAF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while ELEAF trades at $12.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas ELEAF's P/E ratio is 14.55. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ELEAF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to ELEAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs MDRSF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, MDRSF has a market cap of 828.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while MDRSF trades at $66.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas MDRSF's P/E ratio is 196.12. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MDRSF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to MDRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs XVIPF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, XVIPF has a market cap of 693M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while XVIPF trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas XVIPF's P/E ratio is 48.89. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to XVIPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to XVIPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs CALZF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, CALZF has a market cap of 525M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while CALZF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas CALZF's P/E ratio is 76.00. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CALZF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to CALZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs AVMR Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, AVMR has a market cap of 494.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while AVMR trades at $9.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas AVMR's P/E ratio is -18.34. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AVMR's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to AVMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs CLVSF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, CLVSF has a market cap of 459.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while CLVSF trades at $19.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas CLVSF's P/E ratio is 31.61. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CLVSF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to CLVSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs IOBCF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, IOBCF has a market cap of 414.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while IOBCF trades at $14.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas IOBCF's P/E ratio is 39.31. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IOBCF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to IOBCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs CSSPF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, CSSPF has a market cap of 384M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while CSSPF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas CSSPF's P/E ratio is 92.00. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CSSPF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to CSSPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs HYBT Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, HYBT has a market cap of 361.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while HYBT trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas HYBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HYBT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to HYBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs EAPIF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, EAPIF has a market cap of 347.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while EAPIF trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas EAPIF's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EAPIF's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to EAPIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs CYBQY Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, CYBQY has a market cap of 335.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while CYBQY trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas CYBQY's P/E ratio is -70.50. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CYBQY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to CYBQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs BRSYF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, BRSYF has a market cap of 256.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while BRSYF trades at $6.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas BRSYF's P/E ratio is 61.64. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BRSYF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to BRSYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs CLLKF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, CLLKF has a market cap of 245.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while CLLKF trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas CLLKF's P/E ratio is -7.89. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CLLKF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to CLLKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs HTLZF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, HTLZF has a market cap of 245.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while HTLZF trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas HTLZF's P/E ratio is -159.01. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HTLZF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to HTLZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs BCCOY Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, BCCOY has a market cap of 221M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while BCCOY trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas BCCOY's P/E ratio is -7.27. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCCOY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to BCCOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs IMPZY Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, IMPZY has a market cap of 199.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while IMPZY trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas IMPZY's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IMPZY's ROE of -2.86%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to IMPZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs PXMBF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, PXMBF has a market cap of 184.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while PXMBF trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas PXMBF's P/E ratio is 29.17. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PXMBF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to PXMBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs DTXMF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, DTXMF has a market cap of 180.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while DTXMF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas DTXMF's P/E ratio is -9.52. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DTXMF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to DTXMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs CYBQF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, CYBQF has a market cap of 163.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while CYBQF trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas CYBQF's P/E ratio is -61.25. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CYBQF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to CYBQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs EKDHF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, EKDHF has a market cap of 157.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while EKDHF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas EKDHF's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EKDHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to EKDHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs AVHHL Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, AVHHL has a market cap of 137.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while AVHHL trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas AVHHL's P/E ratio is -3.07. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AVHHL's ROE of -3.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to AVHHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs AMEUF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, AMEUF has a market cap of 120.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while AMEUF trades at $5.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas AMEUF's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AMEUF's ROE of -5.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to AMEUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs VMTHF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, VMTHF has a market cap of 110M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while VMTHF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas VMTHF's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VMTHF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to VMTHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs JMDMF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, JMDMF has a market cap of 104.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while JMDMF trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas JMDMF's P/E ratio is -27.83. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JMDMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to JMDMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs IPDQF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, IPDQF has a market cap of 104.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while IPDQF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas IPDQF's P/E ratio is -5.14. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IPDQF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to IPDQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs RSHUF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, RSHUF has a market cap of 91.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while RSHUF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas RSHUF's P/E ratio is -5.81. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RSHUF's ROE of -2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to RSHUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs SOMNF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, SOMNF has a market cap of 90.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while SOMNF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas SOMNF's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SOMNF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to SOMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs SNZZF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, SNZZF has a market cap of 89.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while SNZZF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas SNZZF's P/E ratio is -5.69. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SNZZF's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to SNZZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs CKMTF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, CKMTF has a market cap of 85.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while CKMTF trades at $12.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas CKMTF's P/E ratio is -3.32. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CKMTF's ROE of +2.58%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to CKMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs DMTRF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, DMTRF has a market cap of 76.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while DMTRF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas DMTRF's P/E ratio is -9.86. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DMTRF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to DMTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs FDMDF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, FDMDF has a market cap of 75.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while FDMDF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas FDMDF's P/E ratio is -2.03. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FDMDF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to FDMDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs RDGL Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, RDGL has a market cap of 62.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while RDGL trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas RDGL's P/E ratio is -13.70. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RDGL's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to RDGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs BLOZF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, BLOZF has a market cap of 53M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while BLOZF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas BLOZF's P/E ratio is -23.00. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BLOZF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to BLOZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs BRNHF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, BRNHF has a market cap of 42.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while BRNHF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas BRNHF's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BRNHF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to BRNHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs NVYTF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, NVYTF has a market cap of 38.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while NVYTF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas NVYTF's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NVYTF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to NVYTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs TLTFF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, TLTFF has a market cap of 35.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while TLTFF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas TLTFF's P/E ratio is -14.21. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TLTFF's ROE of -2.57%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to TLTFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs ELXMF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, ELXMF has a market cap of 28.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while ELXMF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas ELXMF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ELXMF's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to ELXMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs MKEAF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, MKEAF has a market cap of 25.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while MKEAF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas MKEAF's P/E ratio is -4.11. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MKEAF's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to MKEAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs EMITF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, EMITF has a market cap of 24.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while EMITF trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas EMITF's P/E ratio is -12.33. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EMITF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to EMITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs KBBTF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, KBBTF has a market cap of 24.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while KBBTF trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas KBBTF's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KBBTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to KBBTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs POSC Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, POSC has a market cap of 21.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while POSC trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas POSC's P/E ratio is 0.37. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to POSC's ROE of +9.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to POSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs MDXHF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, MDXHF has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while MDXHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas MDXHF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MDXHF's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to MDXHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs ASAPF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, ASAPF has a market cap of 19.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while ASAPF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas ASAPF's P/E ratio is -25.30. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASAPF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to ASAPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs GTHP Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, GTHP has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while GTHP trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas GTHP's P/E ratio is -4.70. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GTHP's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to GTHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs PYNKF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, PYNKF has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while PYNKF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas PYNKF's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PYNKF's ROE of -1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to PYNKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs DIZTF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, DIZTF has a market cap of 18M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while DIZTF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas DIZTF's P/E ratio is -11.16. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DIZTF's ROE of -2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to DIZTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs VPTDF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, VPTDF has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while VPTDF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas VPTDF's P/E ratio is -5.32. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VPTDF's ROE of +1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to VPTDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs TMDIF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, TMDIF has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while TMDIF trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas TMDIF's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TMDIF's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to TMDIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs PLLWF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, PLLWF has a market cap of 13.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while PLLWF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas PLLWF's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PLLWF's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to PLLWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs RMSL Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, RMSL has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while RMSL trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas RMSL's P/E ratio is 0.81. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RMSL's ROE of -2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to RMSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs IMEXF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, IMEXF has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while IMEXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas IMEXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IMEXF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to IMEXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs ATBPF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, ATBPF has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while ATBPF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas ATBPF's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ATBPF's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to ATBPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs LXXGF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, LXXGF has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while LXXGF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas LXXGF's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LXXGF's ROE of -1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to LXXGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs NGMDF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, NGMDF has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while NGMDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas NGMDF's P/E ratio is -3.74. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NGMDF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to NGMDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs FZMD Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, FZMD has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while FZMD trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas FZMD's P/E ratio is 2.00. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FZMD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to FZMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs ALRTF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, ALRTF has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while ALRTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas ALRTF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALRTF's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to ALRTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs QLIS Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, QLIS has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while QLIS trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas QLIS's P/E ratio is 2.22. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to QLIS's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to QLIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs RHNMF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, RHNMF has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while RHNMF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas RHNMF's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RHNMF's ROE of +15.91%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to RHNMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs LBLTF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, LBLTF has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while LBLTF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas LBLTF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LBLTF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to LBLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs NUMD Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, NUMD has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while NUMD trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas NUMD's P/E ratio is 4.73. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NUMD's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to NUMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs ADMT Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, ADMT has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while ADMT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas ADMT's P/E ratio is -5.45. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ADMT's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to ADMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs BIEL Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, BIEL has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while BIEL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas BIEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BIEL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to BIEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs ODYY Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, ODYY has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while ODYY trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas ODYY's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ODYY's ROE of +2.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to ODYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs PMEDF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, PMEDF has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while PMEDF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas PMEDF's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PMEDF's ROE of +1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to PMEDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs VANIW Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, VANIW has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while VANIW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas VANIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VANIW's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to VANIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs VYCO Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, VYCO has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while VYCO trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas VYCO's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VYCO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to VYCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs TBRIF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, TBRIF has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while TBRIF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas TBRIF's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TBRIF's ROE of -2.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to TBRIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs ESMC Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, ESMC has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while ESMC trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas ESMC's P/E ratio is 6.87. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ESMC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to ESMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs IRME Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, IRME has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while IRME trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas IRME's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IRME's ROE of +11.77%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to IRME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs USAQ Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, USAQ has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while USAQ trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas USAQ's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USAQ's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to USAQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs UAHC Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, UAHC has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while UAHC trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas UAHC's P/E ratio is 0.57. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UAHC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is more volatile compared to UAHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.
SMMNY vs CRRVF Comparison
SMMNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMMNY stands at 120.6B. In comparison, CRRVF has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMMNY is priced at $26.84, while CRRVF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas CRRVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMMNY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CRRVF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMMNY is less volatile compared to CRRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMMNY.