Siam Makro Public Company Limited

SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.58B. In comparison, AONNY has a market cap of 25.94B. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while AONNY trades at $30.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas AONNY's P/E ratio is 131.65. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AONNY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is more volatile compared to AONNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.

SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.58B. In comparison, SVTMF has a market cap of 19.04B. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while SVTMF trades at $15.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas SVTMF's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SVTMF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is more volatile compared to SVTMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.

SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.58B. In comparison, AONNF has a market cap of 17.78B. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while AONNF trades at $20.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas AONNF's P/E ratio is 103.25. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AONNF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is less volatile compared to AONNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.

SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.58B. In comparison, MAKSY has a market cap of 9.81B. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while MAKSY trades at $9.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas MAKSY's P/E ratio is 15.14. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MAKSY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is more volatile compared to MAKSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.

SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.58B. In comparison, MAKSF has a market cap of 9.71B. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while MAKSF trades at $4.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas MAKSF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MAKSF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is less volatile compared to MAKSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.

SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.58B. In comparison, RYKKY has a market cap of 9.11B. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while RYKKY trades at $34.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas RYKKY's P/E ratio is 25.64. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RYKKY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is more volatile compared to RYKKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.

SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.58B. In comparison, SRGHY has a market cap of 8.49B. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while SRGHY trades at $15.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas SRGHY's P/E ratio is 22.76. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SRGHY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is more volatile compared to SRGHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.

SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.58B. In comparison, SRHGF has a market cap of 8.41B. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while SRHGF trades at $15.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas SRHGF's P/E ratio is 22.24. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SRHGF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is less volatile compared to SRHGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.

SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.58B. In comparison, IMHDF has a market cap of 7.83B. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while IMHDF trades at $21.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas IMHDF's P/E ratio is 19.39. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IMHDF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is more volatile compared to IMHDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.

SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.58B. In comparison, TOKUY has a market cap of 7.20B. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while TOKUY trades at $12.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas TOKUY's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TOKUY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is more volatile compared to TOKUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.

SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.58B. In comparison, RYKKF has a market cap of 6.41B. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while RYKKF trades at $24.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas RYKKF's P/E ratio is 17.90. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RYKKF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is more volatile compared to RYKKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.

SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.58B. In comparison, DDS has a market cap of 5.66B. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while DDS trades at $360.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas DDS's P/E ratio is 9.80. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DDS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is more volatile compared to DDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.

SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.58B. In comparison, TOKUF has a market cap of 5.53B. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while TOKUF trades at $9.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas TOKUF's P/E ratio is 9.92. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TOKUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is less volatile compared to TOKUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.

SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.58B. In comparison, WLWHF has a market cap of 4.10B. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while WLWHF trades at $4.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas WLWHF's P/E ratio is 18.20. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WLWHF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is more volatile compared to WLWHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.

SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.58B. In comparison, JWN has a market cap of 4.08B. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while JWN trades at $24.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas JWN's P/E ratio is 14.02. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JWN's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is more volatile compared to JWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.

SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.58B. In comparison, M has a market cap of 3.24B. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while M trades at $11.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas M's P/E ratio is 5.61. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to M's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is more volatile compared to M. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.

SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.58B. In comparison, INREF has a market cap of 3.17B. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while INREF trades at $29.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas INREF's P/E ratio is 12.67. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to INREF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is more volatile compared to INREF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.

SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.58B. In comparison, LRENY has a market cap of 3.15B. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while LRENY trades at $3.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas LRENY's P/E ratio is 15.55. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LRENY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is more volatile compared to LRENY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.

SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.58B. In comparison, JFROF has a market cap of 2.85B. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while JFROF trades at $11.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas JFROF's P/E ratio is 12.07. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JFROF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is more volatile compared to JFROF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.

SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.58B. In comparison, WLWHY has a market cap of 2.72B. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while WLWHY trades at $3.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas WLWHY's P/E ratio is 16.78. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WLWHY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is more volatile compared to WLWHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.

SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.58B. In comparison, SURRY has a market cap of 2.15B. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while SURRY trades at $2.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas SURRY's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SURRY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is more volatile compared to SURRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.

SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.58B. In comparison, LENTY has a market cap of 2.05B. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while LENTY trades at $1.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas LENTY's P/E ratio is 4.18. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LENTY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is more volatile compared to LENTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.

SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.58B. In comparison, SURRF has a market cap of 2.04B. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while SURRF trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas SURRF's P/E ratio is -10.70. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SURRF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is less volatile compared to SURRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.

SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.58B. In comparison, PMDKY has a market cap of 1.69B. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while PMDKY trades at $20.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas PMDKY's P/E ratio is 15.48. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PMDKY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is less volatile compared to PMDKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.

SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.58B. In comparison, TKSHF has a market cap of 1.68B. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while TKSHF trades at $5.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas TKSHF's P/E ratio is 11.81. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TKSHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is less volatile compared to TKSHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.

SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.58B. In comparison, PGCMF has a market cap of 1.44B. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while PGCMF trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas PGCMF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PGCMF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is less volatile compared to PGCMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.

SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.58B. In comparison, PPASF has a market cap of 1.40B. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while PPASF trades at $1.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas PPASF's P/E ratio is 131.98. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PPASF's ROE of -2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is less volatile compared to PPASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.

SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.58B. In comparison, GDNEF has a market cap of 1.35B. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while GDNEF trades at $0.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas GDNEF's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GDNEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is more volatile compared to GDNEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.

SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.58B. In comparison, PMDKF has a market cap of 1.16B. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while PMDKF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas PMDKF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PMDKF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is less volatile compared to PMDKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.

SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.58B. In comparison, RRETY has a market cap of 1.02B. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while RRETY trades at $6.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas RRETY's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RRETY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is less volatile compared to RRETY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.

SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.58B. In comparison, PKPYY has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while PKPYY trades at $6.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas PKPYY's P/E ratio is -4.15. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PKPYY's ROE of -1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is more volatile compared to PKPYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.

SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.58B. In comparison, LCMRF has a market cap of 840.83M. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while LCMRF trades at $1.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas LCMRF's P/E ratio is 22.70. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LCMRF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is more volatile compared to LCMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.

SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.58B. In comparison, KSS has a market cap of 748.10M. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while KSS trades at $6.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas KSS's P/E ratio is 6.86. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KSS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is less volatile compared to KSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.

SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.58B. In comparison, EXTO has a market cap of 585.66M. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while EXTO trades at $3.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas EXTO's P/E ratio is 90.25. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EXTO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is more volatile compared to EXTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.

SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.58B. In comparison, DDT has a market cap of 416.58M. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while DDT trades at $26.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas DDT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DDT's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is more volatile compared to DDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.

SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.58B. In comparison, CBDBY has a market cap of 233.89M. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while CBDBY trades at $0.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas CBDBY's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CBDBY's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is less volatile compared to CBDBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.

SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.58B. In comparison, CBD has a market cap of 218.06M. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while CBD trades at $0.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas CBD's P/E ratio is -14.83. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CBD's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is more volatile compared to CBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.

SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.58B. In comparison, WHGPF has a market cap of 184.76M. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while WHGPF trades at $0.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas WHGPF's P/E ratio is -26.75. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WHGPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is less volatile compared to WHGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.

SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.58B. In comparison, LHUAF has a market cap of 69.57M. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while LHUAF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas LHUAF's P/E ratio is 0.46. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LHUAF's ROE of +3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is more volatile compared to LHUAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.

SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.58B. In comparison, NWRLY has a market cap of 53.30M. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while NWRLY trades at $0.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas NWRLY's P/E ratio is 26.34. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NWRLY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is more volatile compared to NWRLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.

SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.58B. In comparison, PKSGY has a market cap of 33.37M. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while PKSGY trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas PKSGY's P/E ratio is -1.41. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PKSGY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is more volatile compared to PKSGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.

SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.58B. In comparison, HDVTY has a market cap of 4.27M. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while HDVTY trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas HDVTY's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HDVTY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is more volatile compared to HDVTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.

SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.58B. In comparison, VEST has a market cap of 2.91M. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while VEST trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas VEST's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VEST's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is less volatile compared to VEST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.

SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.58B. In comparison, SRSCQ has a market cap of 101878.00. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while SRSCQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas SRSCQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SRSCQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is less volatile compared to SRSCQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.

SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.58B. In comparison, BONTQ has a market cap of 1786.00. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while BONTQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas BONTQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BONTQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is more volatile compared to BONTQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.

SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.58B. In comparison, LFSYY comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while LFSYY trades at $14.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas LFSYY's P/E ratio is -5.05. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LFSYY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is more volatile compared to LFSYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.

SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.58B. In comparison, LFSYF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while LFSYF trades at $0.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas LFSYF's P/E ratio is -5.23. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LFSYF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is more volatile compared to LFSYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.

SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.58B. In comparison, SHLDQ comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while SHLDQ trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas SHLDQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SHLDQ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is more volatile compared to SHLDQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.