Siam Makro Public Company Limited
Siam Makro Public Company Limited SMKUY Peers
See (SMKUY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Department Stores Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMKUY | $1.00 | +0.00% | 10.6B | 50.00 | $0.02 | +1.56% |
| AONNY | $32.14 | +0.91% | 27.7B | 139.72 | $0.23 | +0.60% |
| AONNF | $27.63 | +0.00% | 25.3B | 120.13 | $0.23 | +0.98% |
| SVTMF | $15.54 | +0.00% | 19.1B | 12.74 | $1.22 | +1.50% |
| RYKKY | $48.42 | +8.52% | 12.8B | 36.41 | $1.33 | +0.42% |
| RYKKF | $38.35 | +0.00% | 10.2B | 29.05 | $1.32 | +0.36% |
| MAKSY | $9.44 | -0.21% | 9.6B | 24.92 | $0.38 | +1.01% |
| MAKSF | $4.54 | -7.35% | 9.2B | 23.89 | $0.19 | +1.05% |
| SRGHY | $15.57 | +0.19% | 8.4B | 21.93 | $0.71 | +2.19% |
| IMHDF | $21.52 | +0.00% | 7.9B | 19.39 | $1.11 | +1.71% |
Stock Comparison
SMKUY vs AONNY Comparison
SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.6B. In comparison, AONNY has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while AONNY trades at $32.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas AONNY's P/E ratio is 139.72. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AONNY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is more volatile compared to AONNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.
SMKUY vs AONNF Comparison
SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.6B. In comparison, AONNF has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while AONNF trades at $27.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas AONNF's P/E ratio is 120.13. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AONNF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is less volatile compared to AONNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.
SMKUY vs SVTMF Comparison
SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.6B. In comparison, SVTMF has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while SVTMF trades at $15.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas SVTMF's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SVTMF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is more volatile compared to SVTMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.
SMKUY vs RYKKY Comparison
SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.6B. In comparison, RYKKY has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while RYKKY trades at $48.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas RYKKY's P/E ratio is 36.41. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RYKKY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is more volatile compared to RYKKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.
SMKUY vs RYKKF Comparison
SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.6B. In comparison, RYKKF has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while RYKKF trades at $38.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas RYKKF's P/E ratio is 29.05. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RYKKF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is less volatile compared to RYKKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.
SMKUY vs MAKSY Comparison
SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.6B. In comparison, MAKSY has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while MAKSY trades at $9.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas MAKSY's P/E ratio is 24.92. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MAKSY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is more volatile compared to MAKSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.
SMKUY vs MAKSF Comparison
SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.6B. In comparison, MAKSF has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while MAKSF trades at $4.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas MAKSF's P/E ratio is 23.89. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MAKSF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is less volatile compared to MAKSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.
SMKUY vs SRGHY Comparison
SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.6B. In comparison, SRGHY has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while SRGHY trades at $15.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas SRGHY's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SRGHY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is more volatile compared to SRGHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.
SMKUY vs IMHDF Comparison
SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.6B. In comparison, IMHDF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while IMHDF trades at $21.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas IMHDF's P/E ratio is 19.39. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IMHDF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is more volatile compared to IMHDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.
SMKUY vs SRHGF Comparison
SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.6B. In comparison, SRHGF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while SRHGF trades at $13.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas SRHGF's P/E ratio is 19.37. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SRHGF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is more volatile compared to SRHGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.
SMKUY vs TOKUF Comparison
SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.6B. In comparison, TOKUF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while TOKUF trades at $9.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas TOKUF's P/E ratio is 9.92. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TOKUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is less volatile compared to TOKUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.
SMKUY vs TOKUY Comparison
SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.6B. In comparison, TOKUY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while TOKUY trades at $9.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas TOKUY's P/E ratio is 20.54. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TOKUY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is less volatile compared to TOKUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.
SMKUY vs WLWHF Comparison
SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.6B. In comparison, WLWHF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while WLWHF trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas WLWHF's P/E ratio is 18.20. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WLWHF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is more volatile compared to WLWHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.
SMKUY vs LRENY Comparison
SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.6B. In comparison, LRENY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while LRENY trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas LRENY's P/E ratio is 15.55. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LRENY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is more volatile compared to LRENY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.
SMKUY vs INREF Comparison
SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.6B. In comparison, INREF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while INREF trades at $26.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas INREF's P/E ratio is 11.04. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to INREF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is less volatile compared to INREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.
SMKUY vs SURRF Comparison
SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.6B. In comparison, SURRF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while SURRF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas SURRF's P/E ratio is 30.20. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SURRF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is less volatile compared to SURRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.
SMKUY vs SURRY Comparison
SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.6B. In comparison, SURRY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while SURRY trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas SURRY's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SURRY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is more volatile compared to SURRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.
SMKUY vs JFROF Comparison
SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.6B. In comparison, JFROF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while JFROF trades at $11.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas JFROF's P/E ratio is 12.07. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JFROF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is more volatile compared to JFROF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.
SMKUY vs WLWHY Comparison
SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.6B. In comparison, WLWHY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while WLWHY trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas WLWHY's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WLWHY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is more volatile compared to WLWHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.
SMKUY vs PGCMF Comparison
SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.6B. In comparison, PGCMF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while PGCMF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas PGCMF's P/E ratio is 9.83. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PGCMF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is more volatile compared to PGCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.
SMKUY vs PMDKY Comparison
SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.6B. In comparison, PMDKY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while PMDKY trades at $20.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas PMDKY's P/E ratio is 15.48. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PMDKY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is less volatile compared to PMDKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.
SMKUY vs TKSHF Comparison
SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.6B. In comparison, TKSHF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while TKSHF trades at $5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas TKSHF's P/E ratio is 11.81. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TKSHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is less volatile compared to TKSHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.
SMKUY vs GDNEF Comparison
SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.6B. In comparison, GDNEF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while GDNEF trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas GDNEF's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GDNEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is more volatile compared to GDNEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.
SMKUY vs PMDKF Comparison
SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.6B. In comparison, PMDKF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while PMDKF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas PMDKF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PMDKF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is less volatile compared to PMDKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.
SMKUY vs PKPYY Comparison
SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.6B. In comparison, PKPYY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while PKPYY trades at $6.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas PKPYY's P/E ratio is -4.15. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PKPYY's ROE of -1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is more volatile compared to PKPYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.
SMKUY vs PPASF Comparison
SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.6B. In comparison, PPASF has a market cap of 971M. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while PPASF trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas PPASF's P/E ratio is 131.98. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PPASF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is less volatile compared to PPASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.
SMKUY vs LCMRF Comparison
SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.6B. In comparison, LCMRF has a market cap of 849.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while LCMRF trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas LCMRF's P/E ratio is 22.70. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LCMRF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is more volatile compared to LCMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.
SMKUY vs RRETY Comparison
SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.6B. In comparison, RRETY has a market cap of 756.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while RRETY trades at $6.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas RRETY's P/E ratio is 8.47. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RRETY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is more volatile compared to RRETY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.
SMKUY vs LENTY Comparison
SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.6B. In comparison, LENTY has a market cap of 534.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while LENTY trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas LENTY's P/E ratio is 4.18. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LENTY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is more volatile compared to LENTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.
SMKUY vs CBDBY Comparison
SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.6B. In comparison, CBDBY has a market cap of 282.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while CBDBY trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas CBDBY's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CBDBY's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is less volatile compared to CBDBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.
SMKUY vs WHGPF Comparison
SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.6B. In comparison, WHGPF has a market cap of 184.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while WHGPF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas WHGPF's P/E ratio is -26.75. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WHGPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is less volatile compared to WHGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.
SMKUY vs LHUAF Comparison
SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.6B. In comparison, LHUAF has a market cap of 74.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while LHUAF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas LHUAF's P/E ratio is 0.50. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LHUAF's ROE of +3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is more volatile compared to LHUAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.
SMKUY vs NWRLY Comparison
SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.6B. In comparison, NWRLY has a market cap of 53.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while NWRLY trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas NWRLY's P/E ratio is 26.34. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NWRLY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is more volatile compared to NWRLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.
SMKUY vs PKSGY Comparison
SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.6B. In comparison, PKSGY has a market cap of 24.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while PKSGY trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas PKSGY's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PKSGY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is less volatile compared to PKSGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.
SMKUY vs VEST Comparison
SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.6B. In comparison, VEST has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while VEST trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas VEST's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VEST's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is more volatile compared to VEST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.
SMKUY vs HDVTY Comparison
SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.6B. In comparison, HDVTY has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while HDVTY trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas HDVTY's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HDVTY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is more volatile compared to HDVTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.
SMKUY vs SRSCQ Comparison
SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.6B. In comparison, SRSCQ has a market cap of 101.9K. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while SRSCQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas SRSCQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SRSCQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is less volatile compared to SRSCQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.
SMKUY vs BONTQ Comparison
SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.6B. In comparison, BONTQ has a market cap of 1.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while BONTQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas BONTQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BONTQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is more volatile compared to BONTQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.
SMKUY vs LFSYF Comparison
SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.6B. In comparison, LFSYF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while LFSYF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas LFSYF's P/E ratio is -5.23. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LFSYF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is more volatile compared to LFSYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.
SMKUY vs SHLDQ Comparison
SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.6B. In comparison, SHLDQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while SHLDQ trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas SHLDQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SHLDQ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is more volatile compared to SHLDQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.
SMKUY vs LFSYY Comparison
SMKUY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMKUY stands at 10.6B. In comparison, LFSYY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SMKUY is priced at $1.00, while LFSYY trades at $14.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMKUY currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas LFSYY's P/E ratio is -5.05. In terms of profitability, SMKUY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LFSYY's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, SMKUY is more volatile compared to LFSYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMKUY.